Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

Occult Science - An Outline
GA 13

Chapter III: Sleep And Death

[ 1 ] The essence of man's waking consciousness cannot be penetrated without observing the condition he lives through in sleep; so too, is the riddle of life insoluble without the study of death. People who have no feeling for the importance of supersensible knowledge will find grounds for skepticism in the very fact that it dwells so much on the facts of sleep and death. We can appreciate the motives of this kind of skepticism. For it is not unreasonable to insist that man is here to lead an active life, and that the more he is devoted to this life, the more efficient and creative he will be; to delve into such things as sleep and death can only spring from a tendency to idle dreaming and lead to nothing more than empty figments of the mind.

People may easily regard the refusal to indulge in such “empty figments” as a sign of mental health, and see in the pursuit of these “idle dreamings” something morbid, natural enough to those deficient in vitality and vigor, without ability to do creative work. We should do wrong merely to brush aside this opinion. There is in it a modicum of truth; it is a quarter-truth, and only needs to be complemented by the remaining three quarters. By arguing against it we only kindle the mistrust of those who see the one quarter well enough but are unaware of the other three.

A study of what lies hidden behind sleep and death is only morbid if it produces weakness and aversion from the realities of life. This may be granted without reservation. Admittedly moreover, much that has claimed the title of “Occult Science” in the past or is pursued today under this name, bears an unhealthy stamp, inimical to life. But the true science of the supersensible does not give rise to anything unhealthy of this kind.

The fact is rather this: As a man cannot always be awake, so for the full reality of life he cannot do without what the supersensible provides. Life goes on in sleep; the faculties with which we work and achieve results in waking consciousness derive strength and renewal from what sleep imparts. So too it is with what man is able to observe within the manifest world. The real world is wider than the field of this type of observation. Therefore the knowledge man can gain within the visible domain needs to be fertilized and complemented by all that he can come to know of the invisible. A man who did not ever and again derive from sleep the renewal of his exhausted powers would destroy his life; likewise, a way of thinking which is not made fruitful by the knowledge of hidden worlds must ultimately lead to emptiness and desolation.

So too with “death.” All living things are subject to death, to the end that new life may arise. It is the knowledge of the supersensible which throws clear light on Goethe's well-known saying, “Nature herself invented death, to have abundant life.” As without death there could be no life in the ordinary meaning of the term, so without insight into the supersensible there can be no true knowledge even of the visible world. Our knowledge of the visible must penetrate again and again to the invisible, that it may live and grow. Thus it becomes apparent that the science of the manifest world is awakened to essential life by the science of the supersensible. In its true form, the latter never has a weakening effect. Time and again it brings refreshment and healing into the outer existence which when abandoned to its own resources becomes weak and ill.

[ 2 ] When a man falls asleep the connection between the members of his being undergoes a change. What we see lying there on the bed includes the physical and the etheric body of the sleeper, but not the astral body nor the I or Ego. Inasmuch as the etheric body remains connected with the physical, the vital functions continue during sleep; left to itself alone, the physical body would of necessity disintegrate. It is the thoughts, the mental images, it is pain and pleasure, joy and grief, the power of giving conscious direction to the will, and all other things of this kind, which are blotted out in sleep. Now of all this the astral body is the bearer.

For an unbiased mind there can of course be no question of supposing that the astral body with its pains and pleasures, with its whole world of ideation and volition, is annihilated during sleep. It is still there, only in a different state. If the human I and astral body are not merely to contain pain and pleasure and all the other things above named, but to have conscious perception of them, the astral body must be united with the physical and etheric bodies, as indeed it is in waking life. In sleep it is not so; it has then withdrawn from the physical and the etheric bodies, as indeed it is in waking life. In sleep it is not so; it has then withdrawn from the physical and the etheric and entered into quite another mode of existence than pertains to it when united with them.

It is the task of supersensible science to investigate this other mode of existence. In sleep the astral body vanishes from external observation; supersensible perception must now trace it through the stages of its life, till on awakening it once more takes possession of the physical and the etheric body.

As with all other knowledge of the world's hidden realities, supersensible observation is necessary for the discovery of the spiritual facts concerning sleep; properly states, however, what has thus been discovered is intelligible to unbiased thinking. For the realities of hidden worlds are manifest in their effects. If we perceive how the processes of the sense-world are made intelligible by the information derived from supersensible perceptions, such confirmation by the facts of life is the kind of proof we may expect. Anyone not wishing to apply the methods—later to be described—for the attainment of supersensible perception, can have the following experience. To begin with, he may simply take the statements of supersensible science and apply them to what is manifest within the compass of his experience. He will discover that life becomes clear and intelligible to him in the process. Indeed the more exact and searching his study of the ordinary life he knows, the more will he be held to this conviction.

[ 3 ] Although the astral body during sleep experiences no ideas or thoughts in consciousness, though it is unaware of pain or pleasure or the like, yet it does not remain inactive. On the contrary, it is precisely during sleep that a most vital activity devolves upon it—an activity into which it has to enter again and again in rhythmical succession, when for a time it has been working in unison with the physical and the etheric body. A pendulum, returning to the middle after swinging left, will swing to the right through the very momentum it has gathered on the left. So it s with the astral body and the I or Ego which it bears within it. Having been active in the physical and etheric body for a time, for a succeeding period of time—precisely as an outcome of this activity—they need to live and move and have their being in a body-free condition, in an environment of pure soul and spirit.

As man is constituted in ordinary life, unconsciousness ensues during this body-free condition of the astral body and Ego. Unconsciousness is in effect the antithesis of the state of consciousness evolved in waking life by union with the physical and the etheric bodies, just as the swing of a pendulum to the right is the antithesis of the swing to the left. The need to enter into this unconscious state is felt by the human soul and spirit as tiredness, fatigue. Fatigue itself is the expression of the fact that during sleep the astral body and Ego are making themselves ready for the next waking state, when they will once again be undoing and reversing in the physical and etheric body what has arisen in the latter—through a purely organic and unconscious formative activity—while free from the soul-and-spirit. This unconscious formative activity, and what takes place in man during his conscious life and by virtue of it, are contrasting states which have to alternate in rhythmical succession.1Supplementary Notes section.

[ 4 ] The form and shape, proper to the physical body of man, can only be maintained by means of a human etheric body, which in its turn must be endowed with the appropriate forces by the astral body. The ether-body is the form-giving agent or architect of the physical. But it can only form the physical body aright if it receives from the astral body the necessary guidance and stimulation. In the astral body are the “pattern-forms” or archetypes according to which the etheric body gives the physical its appointed shape.

Now in the waking life the astral body is not imbued with these archetypal patterns for the physical body, or only to a limited extent. For while awake the soul puts its own pictures, its own images, in their place. Turning his senses to the surrounding world, in the very act of perception man forms pictures, mental images of his surroundings. These images are, to begin with, “disturbers of the peace” for those pattern-forms which stimulate the etheric body in its work of building and maintaining the physical. Only if a man were able by his own inner activity to supply his astral body with such pictures as could give to the etheric body the right kind of stimulus, only then would there be no such disturbance. Yet the fact is that this very disturbance plays an essential part in human life, and as an outcome, while a man is awake the archetypal pictures for his etheric body cannot work with their full power. The astral body fulfills its waking function within the physical body; in sleep it works upon the latter from without.

[ 5 ] Just as the physical body—in the supply of nourishment for example—has need of the outer world to which it is akin, a similar thing is also true of the astral body. Imagine a human physical body taken right away from its appropriate surroundings; it would inevitably perish. The physical body's existence is impossible without the entire physical environment. The whole Earth must be as it is, if human physical bodies are to be present on it. In truth, this human body is but a portion of the Earth-planet, and in a wider sense of the whole physical Universe. In this respect it is as the finger is to the human body as a whole. Separate the finger from the hand—it cannot remain a finger; it will shrink and wither. Such too would be the fate of the human body if severed from the body of which it is a member—from the life-conditions with which the Earth provides it. Raise it a sufficient number of miles above the Earth and it will perish, as the finger does when cut off from the hand. As to his physical body, man may be less aware of this fact than with regard to the finger in relation to this body as a whole. But this is merely because the finger cannot walk about the body as man does about the Earth; hence the dependence is more obvious in the one case than in the other.

Even as the physical body is embedded in the physical world to which it belongs, so too the astral body belongs to a world of its own, from which however it is torn away by man's waking life. This may be illustrated by a comparison. Imagine a vessel full of water. Within the mass of water a single drop has no separate existence. But take a little sponge and draw a drop away, thus severing it from the total mass. Something of this kind happens to the human astral body on awakening. During sleep it is in a world of its own kind, a world to which it properly belongs. On awakening, the physical and the etheric body draw it in and fill themselves with it. These two bodies contain the organs whereby the astral body perceives the external world, to attain which perception it has to be detached from its own world. Yet from the latter alone can it derive the archetypal patterns which it needs for the etheric body.

As food and other necessities are received by the physical body from its environment, so do the pictures of the astral body's environment come to it during sleep. The fact is that the astral body is then living, outside the physical and the etheric, in the great Universe—the selfsame Universe out of which the entire man is born. For in that Universe is the source of the creative patterns,--the archetypal pictures to which man owes his form. In his true being he belongs to the great Universe and is in harmony with it. In waking life he detaches himself from the all-embracing harmony, in order to have outer perceptions. In sleep his astral body returns into the harmony of the Universe, whence on awakening he brings sufficient force into his bodies to enable him for a time once more to forgo the sojourn there.

The astral body thus returns to its pristine home during sleep, and on awakening brings with it into life newly strengthened forces. All this finds expression in the refreshment which a healthy sleep affords. As the further exposition of Occult Science will reveal, the home of the astral body is of far wider compass than the more obvious physical environment to which the physical body belongs. While as a physical being man is a member of the Earth, his astral body belongs to worlds wherein other heavenly bodies are contained besides our planet Earth. The astral body therefore, during sleep, enters a Universe to which other worlds than the Earth belong. But this can only be made fully clear in the further course of our explanations.

[ 6 ] Though it should really be superfluous, prevalent habits of materialistic thought render it not unnecessary to set aside a possible misunderstanding in this connection. People adhering to these ways of thought will be inclined to say: “Surely the scientific procedure is to investigate the physical conditions of such a thing as sleep. Though scientists may not yet be agreed as to its precise causation, this much at any rate is certain: physical processes of one kind or another can be assumed to underlie the phenomenon of sleep.” If only it were realized that supersensible science is not at all against such a contention! All that is said from this quarter is readily accepted, just as it will be admitted that for a house to come into physical existence one brick must be laid on the other, and that when the house is finished its form and its stability are explainable by purely mechanical laws. Yet for the house to come into being the thought of the architect was also necessary. This thought will not be discovered by mere investigation of the mechanical and physical laws. Behind the physical laws in terms of which the structure of the house can be explained, there are the thoughts of the creator. So too, behind what physical science and physiology are perfectly right in bringing forward, there are the hidden realities of which the science of the supersensible is telling.

Admittedly, the same comparison is frequently adduced to justify belief in a spiritual background of the world, and one may find it trite. But in these matters the point is not whether a line of thought is familiar, but whether we have given it due weight. We may well be prevented from appreciating the true weight of an idea because ideas derived from a contrary way of thinking have too much influence upon our judgment.

[ 7 ] A midway condition between waking and sleeping is dreaming. Reflecting on our dream-experiences, we are confronted by a world of pictures, iridescent and in manifold confusion, though not without some hint of underlying method. Pictures arise and fade away again, often bewildering in their sequence. Man in his dream-life is released from the laws which bind his waking consciousness to the perceptions of the senses and the logical rules of judgment. Yet in the world of dreams we seem to divine mysterious laws of its own, fascinating and alluring. This is the deeper reason why we are prone to compare with dreaming the play of fancy and creative imagination which our aesthetic and artistic sense delights in.

We need only call to mind a few characteristic dreams to find all this confirmed. A man will dream, for example, that he is chasing away a dog which has been rushing at him. He awakens and finds himself in the unconscious act of pushing away a portion of the bed-clothes which had been weighing on an unaccustomed part of his body and had become oppressive. In such an instance, what does the dream make of the real, sense-perceptible event? To begin with, the life of sleep leaves entirely in the unconscious what the senses would have perceived in waking life. But it holds fast to one essential—the fact that we are wanting to ward something off—and around this it weaves an imaginary sequence of events. In substance these imaginary pictures are like echoes from the waking life of the day-time, echoes selected at random. The dreamer will generally feel that with the same external cause his dream might just as well have conjured up quite other pictures. Only in one way or another they would relate, in this instance, to the sensation of having to ward something off. The dream, therefore, creates symbolic pictures; it is in fact a symbolist. Inner bodily conditions too can be translated into dream-symbols of this kind. A man will dream that a fire is crackling beside him; he sees the very flames. On awakening, he finds that he put on too many bed-clothes and has grown too hot. The feeling of excessive heat comes out symbolically in the picture of the fire.

Experiences of the most dramatic kind can be enacted in a dream. For instance, a man dreams that he is standing near the edge of a cliff and sees a child running towards it. The dream lets him undergo all the tortures of the thought, “What if the child should fail to notice and fall over!” Presently he sees the child fall and hears the dull thud of the body down below. He wakes up and finds that a familiar object, hanging on the wall of the room, has worked loose and made a dull sounds as it fell. A simple enough event—the dream-life turns it into a sequence of dramatic pictures, full of suspense and excitement.

For the present we need not stop to ponder, how and why—in the last example—the instantaneous thud of the falling object gets extended into a whole series of events, seeming to occupy a considerable time. The point is that the dream translates what waking sense-perception would have shown, into scenes and pictures.

[ 8 ] We see from this that when the senses create from their activity, immediately a creative faculty begins to stir in man. It is the same creative faculty which is at work in fully dreamless sleep, there giving rise to the state of soul we were describing as the antithesis of the waking state. For dreamless sleep, the astral body has to be withdrawn both from the etheric body and from the physical. In dreaming, while separated from the physical body—no longer joined to the physical sense-organs—it still remains connected to some extent with the etheric. The very fact that what is going on in the astral body is perceived in pictures, is due to its connection with the etheric body. The moment this connection too is severed, the pictures fade into complete unconsciousness; dreamless sleep ensues.

The arbitrary, often nonsensical character of dream-pictures is due to the fact that the astral body, disconnected as it is from the sense-organs of the physical, cannot relate its pictures to the proper objects and events of the external world. This becomes very evident when we contemplate the kind of dream in which the I, the Ego, is in a sense divided. For instance, one dreams of oneself as a pupil who cannot answer a question the schoolmaster is putting; yet in the very next moment the master himself gives the required answer. Unable to make use of the organs of perception of his physical body, the dreamer cannot relate the two events to himself as to one and the same person. Even to recognize himself as a continuous and coherent I, man therefore needs to be equipped with outer organs of perception. Only if he had attained the faculty to be aware of his own I without the help of such organs of perception, only then would the continuity and oneness of the I still be perceptible to him even outside the physical body. For supersensible consciousness, faculties of this kind must indeed be acquired. The way to do so will be dealt with in a later chapter.

[ 9 ] Not only sleep; death too is due to a change in the mutual connection between the members of man's being. And here once more, what is apparent to supersensible perception can also be seen in its effects within the manifest world. Here once again, unbiased thinking will find the statements of supersensible science confirmed by the facts of external life, though in this instance the impress of the invisible in the visible domain is less in evidence, and it is therefore not so easy to realize the weight and bearing of those realities of outer life which answer to the statements of supersensible science. Here even more than for other things already dealt with in this volume, if the mind is not open to discern the way in which the sense-perceptible domain relates to the supersensible and indicates the latter's presence, it is only too easy to pronounce the findings of Occult Science mere figments of imagination.

[ 10 ] When a man falls asleep, whereas his astral body is released from its connection with the etheric and physical bodies, the latter still remain united. Not so in death. Left to its own unaided forces, the physical body will now inevitably disintegrate. For the etheric body, on the other hand, death brings about a condition in which it never was throughout the whole time between birth and death, save in exceptional circumstances to be mentioned later. For the etheric is now united with its astral body, and the physical body is no longer with them. The fact is that the etheric and astral bodies do not separate immediately after death. They hold together for a time, by virtue of a force which obviously must be there, for otherwise the etheric body could never have freed itself form the physical, to which it is tenaciously attached, as is shown by the fact that in sleep the astral body fails to part them. At death, the force that holds the etheric and astral bodies together becomes at least effective, detaching the etheric from the physical. To begin with therefore, the etheric body after death is united with the astral body. Supersensible observation shows that this their union varies from one individual to another. All we need say at the moment is that it lasts for a short time—for a few days—after which the astral body frees itself from the etheric body also, and goes on its way without it. While the connection of the two persists, man is in a condition consciously to perceive the experiences of his astral body. So long as the physical body was there, the separation of the astral body from the physical in sleep involved the immediate commencement of its work upon the physical body from without, for the renewal of the outworn organs. With the severance of the physical body at death, this work is at an end. But the spiritual forces which were expended on it during sleep are still there and can now serve a different end, namely to make perceptible the processes within the astral body as such.

From a point of view which would restrict scientific observation to the outer aspects of life, it will be said: “These are so many assertions, evident no doubt to those endowed with supersensible perception; men who are not thus endowed have no way of assessing the truth.” Yet this is not so. Even in this domain, remote though it may seem from ordinary sight and thought, what the science of the supersensible observes can be taken hold of, once discovered, by the normal faculties of thought and judgment. One need only ponder with due judgment the manifest and given relationships of human life. The thinking, feeling and willing of man are related to one another, and to his experiences in and with the outer world, in ways that are unintelligible unless the manifest activities and relationships are understood as the expression of an unmanifest. To thoughtful contemplation, what is here manifest remains opaque and untransparent till we are able to interpret the way the way it takes its course within the physical life of man, as an outcome of non-physical realities disclosed by supersensible cognition. Unillumined by the science of the supersensible, it is as though we were in a dark room without a light. Just as we cannot see the physical objects around us until we have a light, so too we cannot explain what goes on in and through the soul-life of man till we have knowledge of the supersensible.

While man is joined to his physical body, the outer world enters his consciousness in images. After the physical body has been laid aside, he becomes aware of the experiences the astral body undergoes when unconnected with the outer world by physical sense-organs. To begin with, the astral body has no essentially new experiences. Its still remaining connection with the etheric body stands in the way of any new experience. But it possesses in an enhanced degree the memory of the past earth-life, which memory the etheric body—being still united with it—makes to appear in a vivid, all-embracing tableau.

Such is the first experience of the human being after death. He sees his past life from birth till death in a vast series of pictures, simultaneously spread out before him. During this earthly life, memory is only present while—in the waking state—man is united with his physical body. Moreover, it is only present to the limited extent the physical body permits. Yet to the soul herself nothing is lost; everything that has ever made an impression on the soul during this life is preserved. If the physical body were but a perfect instrument for the purpose, it would be possible for us at every moment to conjure up before the soul the whole of our past earthly life. At death all hindrance is removed, and while man still retains the ether-body he has a relatively perfect memory. This vanishes, however, in proportion as the ether-body loses the form it had while it indwelt the physical—a form which bears a fundamental likeness to the latter. This also is the reason why the astral body after a time separates from the etheric. For the astral body can only remain united with the etheric while the latter retains the imprint, the form that corresponds to the physical body.

During the life between birth and death a severance of the etheric body from the physical only takes place in exceptional cases and then only for a short duration. When, for example, a man subjects an arm or leg to an unusual pressure, a portion of the etheric body may become separated from the physical. We say then that the limb has “gone to sleep.” The peculiar sensation it gives is in fact due to the severance of the etheric body. (Here too, of course, materialistic thinking can deny the invisible within the visible, maintaining that the effect is merely due to the physical or physiological disturbances induced by the excessive pressure.) In such a case supersensible perception actually sees the corresponding part of the etheric body moving out and away from the physical. Now when a man undergoes an altogether unaccustomed shock or something of that nature, a like severance of the etheric may ensue for a brief space of time over a large proportion of the body. This happens if he is brought very near to death, as on the point of drowning, or when in imminent danger of a fall in mountaineering.

What is related by individuals who have had such experiences comes very near the truth. Supersensible observation confirms it. They tell how at such a moment the whole of their past life appeared before them in a vast tableau of memory. Among the many examples that might be cited, we select one, the author of which—by the whole tenor of his thought—would have rejected as empty fancies what is here said about these matters. Incidentally, when one is taking the first steps in supersensible observation it is always useful to familiarize oneself with the findings of those who think the science of the supersensible fantastic. They are less easily attributed to favorable bias. (Let occult scientists learn as much as they can from those who deem their efforts futile. If the latter do not respond in kind we need not feel discouraged. Supersensible observation does not of course depend on these evidences for the verification of its results, and in adducing them the intention is not to prove, only to illustrate.)

The eminent anthropologist and criminologist Moritz Benedict, a scientist distinguished too in other branches of research, tells in his reminiscences of an experience of his own. Once he was very nearly drowned while bathing. He saw the whole of his past life in memory before him as though in a single picture.

It is no contradiction if others have described quite differently the pictures they experienced on such occasions, to the extent sometimes that there seemed little connection with the events of their past lives. For the pictures that arise during this altogether unaccustomed state of severance from the physical body are often not so easy to elucidate in their relation to the human being's life. None the less, if thoroughly gone into, some such relation will always be discerned. Nor is it valid to object that someone on the point of drowning did not have the experience at all. For the experience is only possible when the etheric body, while severed from the physical, remains united with the astral. It will not occur if the shock brings about a detachment of the etheric from the astral body too, since there will then be complete unconsciousness, just as there is in dreamless sleep.

[ 11 ] Once more, then: gathered together in a great memory-tableau, the past life of man comes before him during the time immediately following his death. Thereafter, the astral body—severed now from the etheric—goes on its further way alone and by itself. It is not difficult to see that in this astral body there will no remain whatever it has made its own by dint of its own activity while living in the physical. The Ego has to some extent elaborated Spirit-Self, Life-Spirit and Spirit-Man. These, in so far as they are evolved, owe their existence to the Ego to the I—not to the organs of the bodies. Now by its very essence the I is the being which needs no outer organs for its perception. No more does it need outer organs to retain what it has once united with itself.

It may perhaps be objected: why, then, in sleep is there no perception of the evolved Spirit-Self, Life-Spirit and Spirit-Man? There is none because from birth until death the Ego is chained to the physical body. In sleep, it is true, it is with the astral body outside the physical. Yet even then it remains in close connection with the latter, for to the physical body the activity of the astral body, closely associated with the Ego, is directed. Bound as it is to the physical throughout earthly life, the Ego is dependent for its perceptions on the outer world of the senses; it cannot yet receive the manifestations of the spiritual in its original and proper form. Such manifestations can only come to the human Ego when released by death from its connection with the physical and etheric bodies. In life, the physical world holds the soul's activities chained to itself; another world can light up for the soul the moment it has been drawn forth, out of the physical body.

Yet there are reasons why even at this juncture man's connection with the external, sense-perceptible world does not altogether cease. Cravings, in effect, persist, maintaining the connection. These are the cravings man engenders for himself through the very fact that he is Ego-conscious—endowed with an Ego, the fourth member of his being. The cravings and desires which spring from the nature of the three lower bodies can only take effect in the outer world; when these bodies are laid aside, these cravings cease. Due as it is to the external body, hunger is naturally silenced when this body is no longer joined to the Ego. When death has taken place, the Ego, if it had now no other cravings than derive from its own spiritual nature, could draw full satisfaction from the spiritual world into which it is then transplanted. But life has given it other cravings besides these. Life has kindled in it a longing for enjoyments which, while only satisfiable by means of physical organs, are not in essence attributable to these organs. Not only the three bodies crave for satisfaction through the physical world; the Ego too finds enjoyments in this world—enjoyments such that in the spiritual world there are no objects to satisfy the longing for them.

Two kinds of wishes are proper to the Ego during earthly life. First are the wishes which, originating as they do in the three bodies, have to be satisfied in and through the bodies; these wishes naturally cease when the bodies disintegrate. Secondly there are the wishes which originate in the spiritual nature of the Ego. So long as the Ego is living in the bodies, these wishes too will find their satisfaction by means of bodily organs. For the unmanifest, the spirit, is at work here too—manifested through the organs of the body. In and with all that they perceive, the outer senses are at the same time receiving a spiritual portion. This spiritual portion is present also after death, though in a different form. Therefore the spiritual that the Ego craves for in the world of the senses is still available to it when these senses are no longer there.

If then a third kind of wish were not added to these two, death would merely signify the passing on from cravings satisfiable by means of bodily senses, to such as find fulfillment in the direct revelations of the spiritual world. But there are wishes of a third kind—wishes which the Ego engenders for itself while living in the sense-world inasmuch as it takes pleasure in this world even where the latter is not making manifest the spirit.

The lowest kinds of enjoyment can be true manifestations of the spirit. The satisfaction food affords to a hungry creature—this too is a manifestation of the spirit. For by the creature's nourishment something is accomplished, without which—in one essential direction—the spiritual itself could not evolve. But the I of man is able to go beyond this due enjoyment. The I can long for the tasty dish, quite apart form the function nourishment fulfils and in the fulfilling of it serves the spirit. The same applies to many other things belonging to the “sensual” world—that is to say, the world of the senses. Desires are thus engendered which would never have occurred in the sense-perceptible world of Nature, had not the I of man entered this world. Nor is it from the spiritual being of the I as such that these desires spring. The natural enjoyments of the senses are needed by the Ego—even as a spiritual being—while living in the body. In and through sense-perceptible Nature the spiritual manifests itself; it is none other than the spirit which the Ego is enjoying when given up to sensual manifestations through which the spirit-light is shining. In the enjoyment of this light it will continue, even when the nature of the outer sense is no longer the medium through which the spiritual light is radiating.

For sensual desires on the other hand, from which the living spirit is absent, there can be no fulfillment in the spiritual world. Therefore when death ensues the possibility of their assuagement is utterly cut off. The enjoyment of tasty food can only be brought about by means of the bodily organs—tongue, palate and the like—used in taking of food. These organs man no longer has when the physical body haw been laid aside. And if the Ego still feels need of such enjoyment, the need must remain satisfied. In so far as the enjoyment is in harmony with the spirit, it will be present only as long as the physical organs are there. But in so far as the human I has fostered it without thereby serving the spirit, the wish for the enjoyment will persist after death, vainly thirsting for satisfaction.

What now goes on in man can only be imagined if we think of one who has to suffer burning thirst in a desert country where no water is to be found. Such is the lot of the human I after death in so far as it harbors unextinguished cravings for the enjoyments of the outer world and has no organs for their satisfaction. Only, if thirst is here to serve as a comparison for the Ego's plight after death, we must imagine it boundlessly enhanced and extended to all the manifold cravings which may still persist, for the assuagement of which there is no possibility whatever.

The next stage through which the Ego passes is that it gradually frees itself from all these bonds of attachment to the outer world. In this respect it has to bring about within itself a purging and a liberation. All the desires the Ego has engendered while living in the body and that have not their rightful home within the spiritual world, must now be extirpated. As a combustible material is seized and burned by fire, so is the world of cravings dissolved and annihilated after death.

Herewith we peer into a world which supersensible wisdom has very properly described as “the consuming fire of the spirit.” This “fire” seizes hold of every craving which is not only sensual—related, that is, to the sense-perceptible world—but is so in such a way that in its essential nature it does not express the spirit. Pictures like these, in terms of which supersensible insight cannot but describe what actually happens after death, may appear terrible and cheerless. Well may it seem appalling that a hope, for the satisfaction of which sensory organs are that a hope, for the satisfaction of which sensory organs are required, must after death give way to utter hopelessness, or that a wish which the physical world alone is able to fulfill, must change into the burning want of fulfillment. Yet one can only think in this way while failing to perceive that all the wishes and cravings, seized upon after death by the “consuming fire,” represent forces which are not wholesome but in a higher sense destructive, inimical to life. These forces cause the Ego to form closer bonds of attachment to the sense-world than are needed in order to receive from this world that which will serve the Ego's progress. Nature—the “world of the senses”—is a manifestation of the hidden spiritual. There is a form in which the spiritual can only become manifest by means of bodily senses, and in this form the Ego would never be able to receive it, were it not to use the senses for the enjoyment of what is spiritual in the garb of Nature. But the Ego becomes estranged from the world's real and true and spiritual content when cravings for sensual enjoyments through which the spirit is no longer speaking. While sensual enjoyment as an expression of the spirit helps to uplift and evolve the Ego, that which does not express the spirit spells its impoverishment and desolation. And though a craving of this latter kind may lead to satisfaction and enjoyment within the sense-world, its emptying and devastating effect upon the I of man is still there. Only that this effect does not become perceptible to the I until after death. While life goes on, the enjoyment consequent on such a craving can beget new wishes of its kind, and man does not become aware that by his own doing he is enveloping him in a consuming fire. The fire that enveloped him already during life is made perceptible to him after death, and in so doing becomes transmuted into its wholesome and beneficial consequences.

When one human being loves another, he is not only attracted by those of the other's features which are directly sensible by physical organs of perception. And yet of these alone can it be said that death will render him unable any longer to perceive them. On the other hand, after death there becomes visible in the beloved the very reality of being for the perception of which the physical organs were but the means. Moreover then the one thing that will mar this perfect visibility will be the persistence of cravings which can only be satisfied by means of physical organs. Nay, if these cravings were not purged, conscious perception of the beloved would not be possible at all after death. Looked at in this light, the terrible and hopeless picture which the after-death events described by supersensible science might at first sight be seeming to convey, gives place to one that is deeply comforting and satisfying.

[ 12 ] In yet another respect our experiences after death are different from those we have in life. During the time of purification, man—in a sense—lives backwards. He goes again through all that he experienced in life, ever since his birth. Starting from the events immediately preceding death, he re-experiences it all in reverse order, back into childhood. And as he does so, there become visible to him all those things in his life which did not truly spring from the spiritual nature of the Ego. These too he now experiences in an inverted way. Say for example that a man dies in his sixtieth year, and that at the age of forty, in an outburst of anger, he caused another person pain in body or in soul. He will experience the event in consciousness again after death, when in his backward journeying through life he arrives at his fortieth year—the moment when it happened. But he will no experience, not the satisfaction he felt in giving vent to his anger, but instead the suffering the other person underwent through his unkindness. The example shows that what is painful in the after-death experience of an event of this kind is due to a craving to which the Ego gave way—a craving which had its origin in the outer material world and in this alone. In truth, by giving vent to such a craving the ego was doing harm not only to the other human being but to itself; only the harm done to itself remained invisible during life. After death the whole world of harmful cravings becomes perceptible to the Ego. The man now feels drawn to every being and to every object by contact with which a craving of this kind was ever kindled in him, so that the craving may be destroyed even as it originated—destroyed in the consuming fire.

When in his backward journeying man has attained the moment of his birth, all such cravings having now undergone the cleansing fire, there is no longer anything to hinder his unimpaired devotion to the spiritual world. He enters on a new stage of existence. Just as in death the physical body, and soon after it the etheric body was laid aside, so now there falls away and disintegrates the part of the astral body which is unable to live save in the consciousness of the external, physical world. Therefore for supersensible science there are no less than three corpses—physical, etheric and astral. The point of time at which the astral corpse is shed is given by the fact that the period of purification lasts about a third as long as the past life between birth and death. Why this is so will only be clear at a later stage, when the whole course of human life has been more thoroughly gone into in the light of Occult Science. For supersensible perception there are ever present in man's environment the astral corpses cast aside by those who are passing form the stage of purification on to higher levels of existence. It is analogous to what is obviously true for physical perception: physical corpses come into being where human communities are living.

[ 13 ] After the time of purification an entirely new state of consciousness begins for the I of man. Before death, perceptions came to him from without, for the light of his consciousness to fall upon them. Now, as it were, a world of coming to him—into his consciousness—from within. It is a spiritual world, in which the I is also living between birth and death. Here however, it is veiled in the manifestations of the senses; and only when—turning aside from all outward perceptions—the I becomes aware of itself in the inmost “holy of holies” of its being, what otherwise is shrouded in the veils of sense-perceptible Nature, makes itself known directly and in its pristine form. Like to this inner perception of the I before death, “form within outward” is the manifestation of the spiritual world in its fullness, after death and when the time of purification has been absolved.

This kind of manifestation is indeed already there as soon as the etheric body has been laid aside, but like a darkening cloud the world of cravings obscures it, clinging still to the external world. It is as though a blissful world of purely spiritual consciousness were to be interspersed with black demonic shadows, due to the cravings that are being purged in the consuming fire. Indeed these cravings are now revealed to be no mere shadows but very real beings; this becomes evident to man's Ego as soon as the physical organs are taken from him and he is thereby enabled to perceive what is spiritual. The beings look like distortions and caricatures of what was known to him hitherto by sense-perception. For of this realm of the purging fire, supersensible observation must relate that it is inhabited by beings whose appearance of the spiritual eye can only kindle pain and ghastly horror. Their very joy seems to consist in destruction; their passion is directed to an evil compared to which the evils known to us in the outer world seem insignificant. Whatever man takes with him thither by way of cravings of the kind above defined, appears as nourishment to these beings—nourishment by means of which they constantly renew and reinforce their powers.

The picture we have thus been painting of a world imperceptible to the outer senses may seem less incredible if one will look with open mind at well-known aspects of the animal creation. What, to the eye of the spirit, is a ruthlessly prowling wolf? What is revealing itself in the figure of the wolf as the outer senses see it? Surely it is none other than a soul that lives in cravings and acts out of its cravings. The very form of the wolf may be described as an embodiment of its cravings. Even if man had no organs to perceive this outer form, he would still have to recognize the wolf's existence if the cravings, though invisible, made themselves felt in their effect—if there were on the prowl a power invisible to human eye, yet by whose agency all that the visible wolf is doing were being done.

The beings of the purging fire are not present to the outer senses—only to supersensible consciousness. Their effects however are only too evident, in that they tend to destroy the Ego that gives them nourishment. When right enjoyment is carried to intemperance or to excess these effects are made visible enough.

Nature too, as perceived by the outer senses, would entice the Ego, but only in so far as the enjoyment were true to the Ego's own essential being. An animal is urged by instinct to desire that alone of the outer world for which its three bodies crave. Man has higher forms of enjoyment because he has not only the three bodily members but the fourth, the I—the Ego. If then the Ego craves for forms of satisfaction which serve, not the furtherance or maintenance but the destruction of its own being, such desires can neither be the outcome of the three bodies nor of the Ego's proper nature. They can only be the work of beings whose true shape and form remain hidden from the senses, but who gain access precisely to the higher nature of the Ego and entice it into cravings unfounded in the nature of the senses, yet only satisfiable by its means. In effect, there are beings whose food consists of cravings and passions more evil and pernicious than those of any animal, for they live not in the true nature of the senses but seize the spiritual and drag it down on to the sensual level. Their forms and features are to the spiritual eye more hideous and ghastly than those of the most savage animals. The latter, after all, do but incorporate natural passions, natural desires. The destructiveness of these beings boundlessly exceeds the wildest ravings known to us in the animal world as seen by the outer senses. Supersensible knowledge must in this way extend man's outlook to a world of beings who in a sense are on a lower level than any visible animal, even the most noxious and destructive.

[ 14 ] When after death man has passed through this world, he finds himself face to face with a world of pure spiritual content—a world, moreover, which begets in him only such longings as will find satisfaction in the purely spiritual. But he still distinguishes what appertains to his own I or Ego from what constitutes his environment, which we might also call the “spiritual outer world” for the Ego. Only, once more, his experiences of this environment come to him in the same way in which the inner perception of his own I came to him while living in the body. While in the life between birth and death the environment of man speaks to him through the organs of his bodies, when he has laid all the bodies aside the language of his new environment of man speaks to him through the organs of his bodies, when he has laid all the bodies aside the language of his new environment speaks directly into the inmost “holy of holies” of the I am. Now therefore the whole environment of man is replete with beings alike in kind to his own I, for in effect, only an I has access to an I. Even as minerals, plants and animals, surrounding him in the world of sense, constitute sense-perceptible Nature, so after death man is surrounded by a world composed of spiritual Beings.

Yet he brings with him thither something more—something which in yonder world is not his environment. In effect, he brings with him what his Ego has experienced while living in the sense-world. The sum-total of these his experiences first appeared to him in an all-embracing memory-tableau immediately after death, while the etheric body was still connected with his Ego. The ether-body was then laid aside, but something of the memory-tableau remained as an enduring possession of the Ego. It is as thought an extract, a quintessence, were distilled of all the experiences that had come to the human being between birth and death. This is the thing that endures. It is the spiritual yield, the fruit of life. The yield, once more, is of a purely spiritual nature. It contains all the spiritual content, manifested during life through the outer senses. Spiritual though it is, without man's sojourn in the sense-world it could never have come into existence. After death, the I of man feels this spiritual fruit, culled in the world of the senses, to be his own—his inner world. With this possession he is entering into the spiritual world—a world composed of beings who manifest themselves as an I alone can manifest itself in its own inmost depths. A seed, which is a kind of extract of the whole plant, can only develop when planted in another world—the earthly soil. What the Ego brings with it from the sense-world is like a seed—a seed received into the spiritual world, under whose influences it will now develop.

The science of the supersensible can at most give pictures in attempting to describe what happens in this “Land of Spirits.” Yet the pictures can be true to the reality. Experiencing the facts invisible to the external eye, supersensible consciousness can feel these pictures of them to be true. The spiritual realities can thus be illustrated by comparisons from sense-perceptible Nature. Purely spiritual though they are, they none the less bear a certain likeness to this world of Nature. As in this world a color will appear when the eye receives an influence from the appropriate object, so too in Spirit-land, under the influence of a spiritual Being, the Ego will experience a kind of color. Only the color-experience will come about in the way in which the Ego's own inner self-perception—and this alone—comes about during the life between birth and death. It is not as though light from outside were impinging on him; rather as though another Being directly influenced the Ego of man, impelling him to represent the influence to himself in a color-picture. Thus do all Beings in the spiritual environment of the Ego find expression in a world radiant with color.

Needless to say, since the manner of their origin is so very different, the color-experiences of the spiritual world differ in character from those we enjoy in the world of Nature. The same applies to other kinds of sense-impression which man receives from this world. It is the sounds of the spiritual world which are most like the corresponding impressions of the sense-world. The more man lives his way into the spiritual world, the more does it become for him an inner life and movement, comparable to the sounds and harmonies of sense-perceptible reality. Only he feels the sound, not as approaching an organ of perception from outside, but as a power flowing outward into the world from his own Ego. He feels it as in the sense-world he would feel his own speech or song; yet in the spiritual world he is aware that the sounds, even while proceeding from himself, are in reality the manifestation of other Beings, pouring themselves into the World through him.

There is a yet higher form of manifestation in the Spirit-land, when spiritual sound is enhanced to become the “spiritual Word.” Not only does the surging life and movement of another spiritual Being then pour through the I of man; the Being himself communicates his inmost being to the I. Without the remnant of separation which in the world of the senses even the most intimate companionship must have, two beings live in one-another when the Ego is thus poured through and through by the spiritual Word. In all reality, such is the Ego's companionship with other spiritual beings after death.

Three distinct regions of Spirit-land—the land of Spirits—are apparent to supersensible consciousness. We may compare them with three domains of sense-perceptible Nature. The first is as it were the “solid land” of the spiritual world; the second the “region of oceans and rivers;” the third the “air” or “atmosphere.

Whatever assumes physical form upon Earth and is thus made perceptible to physical organs, is seen in its spiritual essence in the first region of Spirit-land. For example, one may there perceive the power which builds the form of a crystal. Only what there reveals itself is like the antithesis of what appears to the senses in the outer world. The space which is here filled by the rocky material appears to the spiritual eye as a kind of hollow or vacuum; while all around the hollow space is seen the force building the form of the stone. The characteristic color which the stone has in the sense-world is experienced in the spiritual world as its complementary. Seen therefore from Spirit-land, a red stone is experienced with a greenish and a green stone with a reddish hue. Other properties too appear as their antithesis. Even as stones, rocks and geological formations constitute the solid land—the continental region—of the world of Nature, so do the entities we have been describing constitute the “solid land” of the spiritual world.

All that is life in the sense-world is the oceanic region of the spiritual world. To the eye of sense, life appears in its effects—in plants and animals and human beings. To the eye of the spirit, life is a flowing essence, like seas and rivers pervading the Spirit-land. Better still is the comparison with the circulation of the blood in the human body. For while the seas and rivers in external Nature appear as though distributed irregularly, there is a certain regularity in the distribution of the flowing life above all which is experienced as living spiritual sound.

The third region of Spirit-land is the airy sphere or “atmosphere.” All that is feeling and sensation in the outer world is present in the spirit-realm as an all-pervading element, comparable to the air on Earth. We must imagine an ocean of flowing sensation. Sorrow and pain, joy and delight, are wafted in that region as are wind and tempest in the atmosphere of the outer world. Think of a battle being fought on Earth. Not only are there facing one another the figures of the combatants which the outer eye can see. Feelings are pitted against feelings, passions against passions. Pain fills the battlefield no less than the forms of men. All that is there of passion, pain, victorious exultation, exists not only in its outer sense-perceptible effects; the spiritual sense becomes aware of it as a real event in the airy sphere of Spirit-land. Such an event is in the spiritual like a thunderstorm in the physical world. Moreover the perception of such events may be compared to the hearing of words in the physical world. Hence it is said: Even as the air enwraps and permeates the inhabitants of earth, so does the wind of the Spirit—the “wafting of the spiritual Words”—enwrap and permeate the beings and events of Spirit-land.

[ 15 ] Further perceptions are possible in the spiritual world, comparable to the warmth and also to the light of the physical world. Warmth permeates all earthly things and creatures, and it is none other than the world of thoughts which in like manner permeates all things in Spirit-land. Only these thoughts must be conceived as independent living Beings. The thoughts man apprehends within the manifest world are but a shadow of the real thought-being, living in the land of Spirits. One should imagine the thought, such as it is in man, lifted out of him and as an active being endowed with an inner life of its own. Even this is but a feeble illustration of what pervades the fourth region of Spirit-land. Thoughts in the form in which man perceives them in the physical world between birth and death are but a manifestation of the real world of thoughts—the kind of manifestation that is possible by means of bodily organs The thoughts man cultivates—those above all which signify an enrichment of the physical world—originate in this region of Spirit-land. This does not only apply to the ideas of great inventors or men of genius. Fruitful ideas “occur” to every human being—ideas he does not merely borrow from the outer world, but which enable him to work upon this world and change it. While feelings and passions occasioned by the external world belong to the third region of Spirit-land, all that can come to life in the soul of man so that he becomes creative, acting on his environment in such a way as to transform and fertilize it, is manifested in its archetypal being in the fourth region of the spiritual world.

The prevailing element of the fifth region may be likened to the light of the physical world. It is none other than Wisdom, manifested in its pristine, archetypal form. Beings belong to that region who pour Wisdom into their environment, even as the Sun sheds light upon physical creatures. Whatsoever the Wisdom shines upon, is revealed in its true significance for the spiritual world, just as a physical creature reveals its color when the light is shining on it. There are yet higher regions of Spirit-land; we shall refer to them again in later chapters.

Such is the world in which the I of man is steeped after death, with the yield he brings with him from his life in the outer world of sense. This yield, this harvest, is still united with the part of the astral body which was not cast off when the time of purification was over. For, as we saw, only part of the astral body then falls away—namely the part which with its wishes and cravings clung to the physical life even after death. The merging of the Ego into the spiritual world with all that it has gained from the sense-world may be likened to the embedding of a seed into the ripening earth. The seed draws to it the substances and forces of the surrounding soil, so that it may unfold into a new plant. In like manner, development and growth are of the essence of the I of man when planted in the spiritual world.

In what an organ perceives also lies hidden the creative force to which the organ is due. It is the eye that perceives the light, and yet without the light there would be no eye. Creatures that live perpetually in the dark fail to develop organs of sight. Thus the whole bodily man is created out of the hidden forces of what the several members of his bodies are able to perceive. The physical body is built by the forces of the physical world, the ether-body of those of the world of life; the astral body has been formed out of the astral world. Transplanted into Spirit-land, the Ego meets with these creative forces, which remain concealed from physical perception. Spiritual beings who, though unseen, surround man all the time, and who have built his physical body, become perceptible to him in the first region of Spirit-land. While in the physical world he can perceive no more than the outer manifestation of the creative and formative spiritual powers to which his own physical body is due, after death he is in their very midst. They now reveal themselves to him in their original and proper form, previously hidden from him. In like manner, throughout the second region he is amid the creative forces of which his ether-body consists, and in the third there flow towards him the powers of which his astral body is formed and organized. The higher regions too of Spirit-land now pour in upon him the creative powers to which he owes the very form and substance of his life between birth and death.

[ 16 ] These Beings of the spiritual world henceforth collaborate with the fruit of his former life which man himself has brought with him—the fruit which is now about to become the seed. And by this collaboration man is built up anew—built, to being with, as a spiritual being. In sleep the physical and etheric bodies are still there; the astral body and the Ego although outside, are in communication with them. The influences from the spiritual world received by the astral body and the Ego during sleep can only serve to repair the faculties and forces exhausted in the waking hours. But when the physical and the etheric body, and after purification the parts of the astral body which were still chained to the physical world by desire, have been cast off, what flows to the Ego from the spiritual world becomes not only the repairer; henceforth it is the re-creator. And after a lapse of time (as to the length of which we shall have more to say,) the Ego is again invested with an astral body, able to live in an etheric and physical body such as are proper to the human being between birth and death. He can be born again and re-appear in a new earthly life, in which the fruits of his former life have been incorporated.

Till his investment with a new astral body, man is the conscious witness of his own re-creation. And as the Beings of Spirit-land reveal themselves to him not through external organs but from within, like his own inmost I in the act of self-awareness, he can perceive the revelation so long as his attention does not yet incline towards a world of outer percepts. But from the moment when his astral body has been newly formed, he begins again to turn his attention outward. The astral once again demands an external body—physical and etheric—and in so doing turns away form what is manifested purely from within. Hence there now comes an intermediate condition during which man is plunged into unconsciousness. Consciousness will only be able to re-awaken when in the physical world the necessary organs—organs of physical perception—have been developed. During this intermediate time—the spiritual consciousness illumined by purely inner perception having faded—a new etheric body begins to be formed and organized about the astral body. This being done, man is prepared to re-enter into a physical body. Consciously to partake in the last two events—his re-equipment with an etheric and with a physical body—would only be possible for an Ego which by its own spiritual activity had developed the hidden creative forces of these bodies, in other words, Life-Spirit and Spirit-Man. So long as man has not yet reached this stage, Beings more advanced in evolution than himself have to direct the process. Such Beings guide the astral body towards a father and mother, so as to endow it with the appropriate etheric and physical bodies.

Now before the new etheric body has been formed and incorporated with the astral body, an event of great significance is undergone by the human being about to re-enter physical existence. In his preceding life, as we saw, he engendered hindering and disturbing forces, revealed to him during his backward journeying after death. Let us return to the above example. At age forty in his former life, in a sudden upsurge of anger, a man did harm to another. He was confronted after death by the other's suffering, as a force hindering the development of his own Ego. So too with all such occurrences of the preceding life. Now on re-entry into physical life these hindrances to his development confront the I of man. As after death a kind of memory-tableau of the past, he now experiences a pre-vision of his coming life. He sees it in a kind of tableau once again, showing him all the obstacles he must remove if his development is to go forward. What he thus sees becomes the source of active forces which he must carry with him into the coming life. The picture of the suffering he caused his fellow-man becomes a force impelling his Ego, now about to enter earthly life once more, to make good the hurt which he inflicted. Thus does the former life wield a determining influence upon the new; the deeds of the new life are, in a way, caused by the deeds of the old. In this relationship of law and causation between an earlier and a later life we have to recognize the real Law of Destiny—often denoted by a word taken from Oriental Wisdom, the law of “Karma.”

[ 17 ] The building of a new bodily organization is however not the only activity incumbent upon man between death and a new birth. While this is going on he lives outside the physical world. But this world too is going forward in its evolution all the time. In comparatively short periods of time the face of the Earth is changed. What did it look like a few thousand years ago, say in the regions of Middle Europe? When man appears again in a new life, the Earth will as a rule be looking very different from what it did last time. Much will have altered during his absence, and in this changing of the face of the Earth, here once again hidden spiritual forces are at work. These forces issue from the very same spiritual world in which man sojourns after death, and he himself is working in and with them; he too has to cooperate in the necessary transformation of the Earth. So long as he has not yet developed Life-Spirit and Spirit-Man and thus attained clear consciousness of the connection between the spiritual and its physical expression, he can of courser only do this under the guidance of higher Beings. None the less, he participates in the work of transforming the conditions upon Earth, and it is true to say: During the time between death and a new birth human beings are at work transforming the condition of the Earth so that it shall accord with what has been evolving in themselves. Picture a region or locality on Earth such as it was at a given time in the past, and then again—profoundly changed—a long time after; the forces which have wrought the change are in the realm of the dead. Thus are the souls of men still in communication with the Earth even between death and a new birth. Supersensible consciousness sees in all physical existence the outer manifestation of hidden spiritual realities. To physical observation, it is the rays of the Sun, changes of climate and the like which bring about the transformation of the Earth. To supersensible observation, in the light-ray falling from the Sun upon the plants and virtues of the dead are working. We become conscious of how the souls of men are hovering about the plants, changing the earthly soil, and other things of this kind. Man's activity after death is devoted not only to himself—not only to the preparation for his own new earthly life—but he is called to work upon the outer world in a spiritual way, even as in the life between birth and death it is his task to work upon it physically.

[ 18 ] Not only does the life of man in Spirit-land influence and modify the prevailing conditions of the physical world, but conversely too, his life and action in physical existence have their effect in the spiritual. To take one example: there is a bond of love between a mother and her child. The love proceeds from a natural attraction, rooted in forces of sense-perceptible Nature. Yet in course of time it is transformed. The natural grows ever more into a spiritual bond, and this is welded not only for the physical world but for the spiritual.

So too it is with many other relationships of life. Threads that are spun in the physical world by spiritual beings persist in the spiritual world. Friends who were closely united in this life belong together in Spirit-land as well; nay, when their bodies have been laid aside, they are in still more intimate communion. For as pure spirits they are there for each other in the way that was described before; it is from within that spiritual beings manifest themselves to one-another. Moreover, bonds that have once been woven between one human being and another will lead them together again in a new life on Earth. Thus in the deepest sense it is true that we find one-another again after death.

[ 19 ] The cycle of human life from birth till death and thence to a new birth repeats itself periodically. Again and again man returns to the Earth when the fruits gained in a preceding physical life has ripened in Spirit-land. But this is not a repetition without beginning or end. Time was when man advanced from other forms of existence to those here described, and in the future he will pass on to different ones again. We shall gain an idea of these transitions in due course, when in the light of supersensible consciousness we shall be describing the evolution of the World in its relation to Man.

[ 20 ] For outer observation, what does on between death and a new birth is of course still more hidden than the underlying spiritual reality of manifest existence between birth and death. As to this part of the hidden world, sensory observation will only see the corresponding effects when they enter into physical existence. The question is, therefore, whether on entering this life through birth man brings with him any evidence of the events since a preceding death, described by supersensible science. Finding a snail's shell in which no trace of any animal can be detected, we shall admit that the shell was produced by an animal's activity and vital functions. We cannot imagine this form to have been the product of mere inorganic forces. In like manner, if in our contemplation of man's earthly life we find what cannot possibly have had its origin in this present life, we can admit with reason that is may be the outcome of what the science of the supersensible describes, if in fact, a light of explanation thereby falls on the otherwise inexplicable. Here therefore too, wide-awake observation with the senses and the thinking mind can find the visible effects intelligible in the light of invisible causes. A man who looks at life with fully open mind will come to see increasingly that this is right; it will impress itself on him with every new observation. The question only is to find the appropriate point of view in each instance. Where, for example, are the effects to be seen of what the human being underwent during the time of purification described by supersensible science? How do the effects appear of his experiences after purification in a purely spiritual real—once more, according to the researches of spiritual science?

[ 21 ] Riddles enough impress themselves upon our thought whenever we earnestly reflect on human life. We see one man born in misery and need, equipped with scanty talents. By the very circumstances of his birth he seems predestined to a life of hardship and limitation. Another is tended and looked after with every care and solicitude from the first moment of his existence. Brilliant faculties unfold in him; he seems predestined to a fruitful and fully satisfying life. In face of such questions two different ways of thought and feeling can make themselves felt. The one wants strictly to adhere to what is seen by the outer senses and understood by the intellect which takes its data from them. A man of this way of thinking will see no deeper question in the fact that one human being is born to happiness, another to ill fortune. And even if he does not have recourse to the word “chance,” he will not think of looking for a deeper law or causal nexus to which these things might be due. As to the presence or the lack of innate talents, he will insist that these are “inherited” from parents, grandparents and other forebears. He will decline to seek the causes in spiritual experiences the individual himself went through before his birth, whereby he shaped his gifts and talents for himself quite apart from physical heredity.

A man imbued with the other way of thought and feeling will not be satisfied with this. Surely—he will aver—even in the manifest world nothing happens in a given locality and environment without some underlying cause. And though in many instances our science may not yet have found them, we can assume the causes to be there. An alpine flower does not grow in low-lying plains; there is something in its nature belonging to the alpine heights. So too there must be something in a human being, causing him to be born into a given environment. Nor is it adequate to look for causes within the physical world alone. To one who thinks more deeply, undue insistence on these causes is like attempting to explain the fact that one man hit another, not by the feelings of the one who dealt the blow but by the physical mechanism of his hand.

This other way of thinking will feel equally dissatisfied with the attributing of gifts and talents to “heredity” alone. Of course it may be pointed out how talents have been and are sometimes inherited in families. For two and a half centuries musical talents were inherited by members of the Bach family. No less than eight mathematicians of distinction sprang form the Bernoulli family. Though some had very different careers mapped out for them in childhood, again and again the “hereditary” talent drew them into the family profession. It might also be contended that by a detailed study of his ancestry a particular man's talents can be shown to have appeared in one way or another in his forebears, so that he is merely benefiting by the summation of inherited potentialities.

A man whose thinking leans towards the spiritual will certainly not disregard evidences of this kind, and yet for him they cannot be what they are to those who want to base all their explanations on facts accessible to the outer senses. He will point out that inherited potentialities cannot of their own accord add up into a complete and integrated personality, any more than the several metallic parts will of their own accord assemble into the watch. And if objection is made that the conjunction of the parents can surely have brought about the combination, thus as it were taking the watchmaker's place, he will answer: Look but with open vision, how altogether now a thing is the personality of every child we see! This cannot possibly come from the parents, for the simple reason that it is not there in them.

[ 22 ] Unclear thinking may give rise to much confusion here. It is silliest of all when those of the former way of thinking represent those of the latter as disregarding and opposing well-established facts. For it need never occur to them to deny the truth or value of the facts alleged. They too can fully see that a mental or spiritual gift or even bent of mind will be “inherited” in a particular family, or that inherited potentialities, added and combined in a descendant, have produced a man or woman of eminence. Readily will they acquiesce when told that the most eminent name is seldom to be found at the head but generally at the latter end of a line of descent. But it should not be taken amiss when they derive from all those things quite other thoughts than do those who will not go beyond super-sensible data. For to the latter the following answer can be made. Certainly a man bears the stamp of his forebears, for the soul-and-spirit, entering physical existence through birth, derives the bodily element from what heredity provides. But this is to say no more than that an entity naturally bears the features of the medium in which it is immersed! It is a quaint and no doubt a trite comparison, yet to an open mind it is surely apposite: A man who has fallen into the water will be wet, but his wetness is no evidence of his inner nature. No more is a human beings' however obvious investment with some of the characteristics of his forebears evidence as to the origin of those which are uniquely his. Moreover this too may be said: If the most eminent name comes at the end of a line of descent, it shows that the bearer of the name required that very line of blood-relationship to form the body needed in this life for his own individual development and expression. It is no proof of the hereditary character of what he—individually—was. Indeed to healthy logic it proves, if anything, the reverse. For if individual gifts were inherited, they surely would appear at the beginning of a line of descent and be handed down from thence to the individual descendants. That they appear at the end, is evidence that they are not hereditary.

[ 23 ] Now it cannot be denied that many of those who believe in spiritual causes also tend to make confusion worse confounded. They talk too much in vague and general terms. To maintain that a man is the mere sum-total of his inherited characteristics may indeed by like saying that the metallic parts have assembled of their own accord into the watch. Yet it must also be granted that many would-be arguments on behalf of a spiritual world are as though one were to say: “The metallic parts of a watch cannot of themselves join up so as to drive the hands forward; therefore there must be some spiritual entity driving them forward.” As against such a construction, the man who answers: “What do I care for ‘mystical’ being of this kind? I want to know the mechanical construction by means of which the forward movement is in fact produced,” is building on far better ground. The point is not to be vaguely aware that underlying the mechanical contrivance—the watch, in this instance—there is the spiritual entity, the watchmaker. The thing of practical significance is to get to know the thoughts in the mind of the watchmaker—thoughts which preceded the making of the watch. These thoughts are in the mechanism and can be found there.

[ 24 ] Merely to dream and spin fancies about the supersensible can only lead to confusion and is least likely to satisfy opponents. They are quite right in contending that the vague reference to supersensible begins in no way helps one to understand the facts. Many opponents, it is true, will make the same objection to the precise and clear descriptions of spiritual science. But in this case it can be pointed out how the effects of hidden spiritual causes are manifested in external life. It can be said: Assume for once that what is claimed to have been found by spiritual observation is actually true. Assume that after death a man passed through a time of purification, when he experienced in soul how a thing done by him in a preceding life was going to be an evolutionary hindrance. While he had this experience, there grew in him the impulse to make good the consequences of his action. This impulse he brings with him into a new life; the presence of it is a trait in his nature, leading him to the place and situation where the needed opportunity is given. Think of all impulses of this kind, and you have a cause for the particular human environment into which the man was destined to be born.

Or take another assumption. Suppose once more: what spiritual science tells is true. The fruits of a past life on Earth are embodied in the spiritual seed of man. The Spirit-land wherein he sojourns between death and a new earthly life is the realm where these fruits ripen, to re-emerge in the new life transmuted into aptitudes and talents and making him the man his is, so that his present character and being appear as the effect of what was gained in a former life. Take this as a hypothesis and with it candidly look out into life. If it consistent, in the first place, with a healthy recognition of the outer facts—facts accessible to the senses—in their full truth and import. At the same time it makes intelligible ever so many things which, if one had to rely upon the outer facts alone, must remain unintelligible to anyone whose mind and feeling do not incline towards the spiritual world. Above all, it will put an end to that inverted logic, of which a typical instance was the proposition that because the most eminent name occurs at the end of a hereditary tree, therefore the man who bears it must have inherited his gifts. The supersensible facts ascertained by spiritual science makes life intelligible to sound logic and straightforward thinking.

[ 25 ] Still, the conscientious seeker after truth, without experience of his own in the supersensible world yet looking for a deeper understanding of the facts, may have another difficulty at this point, the force of which should be admitted. He may contend: Surely we cannot assume that a thing is true merely because it helps explain the otherwise inexplicable. Needless to say, this objection will not trouble those who know the thing in question by their own supersensible experience. Later on in this book a path will be indicated which one may go along, to learn to know by one's own experience not only the other spiritual facts here described but the law of spiritual causation too. But for those who do not want to take this path, the difficulty remains. Moreover even for those who do, what will now be said in answer to it may be of value. Rightly received and understood, it is indeed the very best way of taking the first step.

Certainly we ought not to assume things of the existence of which we have no other knowledge, merely because they give a satisfying explanation of the otherwise inexplicable. But with the spiritual facts here adduced the case is really different. To assume them has not the mere intellectual consequence of making life intelligible theoretically. When we receive them—even as hypotheses—into our thoughts, we experience far more than this, and different in kind. Think of a man to whom a great misfortune happens, from which he suffers deeply. He can meet the occurrence in either of two ways. He can experience the pain of it, give himself up to this emotion and maybe even succumb to his distress. But he can fact it in a different way, saying to himself: “In reality, it was I who in the past life planted in myself the forces which have now confronted me with this occurrence. I have inflicted it upon myself.” He can now kindle in himself all the feelings which this thought may carry in its train. Of course the thought must be entertained with great earnestness and intensity to have an adequate effect upon his life of feeling. But anyone who manages to do this will make a very significant discover—best illustrated by a comparison. Each of two men, let us suppose, is given a stick of sealing-wax. The one indulges in intellectual reflections upon its “inner nature.” His thoughts may be profound, but if this inner nature is in no way revealed he will very soon be told that they are vain speculation. The other rubs the sealing-wax with a silken cloth and demonstrates how it will attract small bodies. There is a vital difference between the thoughts that passed through the first man's head, giving rise to his philosophical reflections, and those of the second man. The former are without factual consequence, whereas the latter have led to a force of Nature—a real and potent fact—being conjured forth from its hidden state.

Such are the thoughts of one who thinks how in a former life he planted in himself the force that led him into a painful misfortune. The mere idea that this was so kindles in him a real power—a power to meet the event quite differently than he could do without it. It dawns upon him how inherently necessary, how essential was the event which he could otherwise only have looked upon as an unfortunate mischance. With direct insight he will realize: “This thought was right, for it has had the power to reveal to me the real state of affairs.” Inner experiments of this kind, actively repeated, become an ever increasing source of inner strength, and by their fruitful outcome prove their truth. The demonstration grows impressive—ever more so. In spirit and in soul, and physically too, the experience is health-giving—in all respects a positive and beneficial influence upon one's life. A man becomes aware that with such thoughts he takes his proper stand amid the ups and downs of life, whereas if he were only thinking of the single life between birth and death he would be giving himself up to illusions. Knowledge of reincarnation fortifies his inner life.

Admittedly, this intimate and searching proof of the spiritual law of causation can only be gained by each man for himself, in his own inner life. And it is really possible for everyone. No-one who has not gained it for himself can judge of its demonstrative power, while those who have can hardly doubt it any more. We need not be surprised that this is so. For where a thing is so bound up with a man's individuality, his inmost being, it is but natural that it can only be adequately proved by his own inner experience.

This does not mean however that because it answers to an inner experience of the soul the question can only be settled by each man for himself and therefore cannot be the subject-matter of a valid spiritual science. True, everyone must have the experience himself, just as everyone has to perceive for himself the proof of a theorem in mathematics. But the pathway by which the experience is reached, no less than the method of proving the mathematical theorem, is universally valid.

[ 26 ] Apart of course from actual observation in the supersensible, the proof above described is undeniably the only one which by the potency an fertile outcome of its thoughts stands firm in face of every fair and rational approach. Other considerations may be of great significance, and yet in all of them a sincere opponent may find loopholes. One other thought—evident enough to fair-minded insight—does however deserve mention. The very fact of education—that man is educable—goes a long way to prove that in the human child there is a spiritual being clad in a bodily garment and working his way through into life. Compare man with the animal. The characteristic properties and faculties of the animal are apparent from birth onward—a well-defined totality, of which the plan is manifestly given by heredity and then develops by contact with the outer world. See how the chick begins to fulfill the functions of its life as soon as ever it is hatched. How different with man! While he is being educated things which may well have no connection whatever with his heredity meet him and come into relation with his inner life. He proves able to assimilate and make his own the effects of these external influences. As every educator is aware, powers and faculties from the pupil's own inner life must come to meet these influences; if they do not, schooling and education are useless. An educator of sufficient insight will even mark the clear dividing line between the inherited tendencies and those inner faculties of his pupils which ray right through the latter, originating as they do in former lives.

True, in this field we cannot offer proofs as literally “weighty” as are the scientific proofs for which a balance is used in a physical experiment. But we are dealing here with the more intimate realities of life. To a sensitive thinker the kind of evidence just indicated, intangible though it is, has a validity even more cogent than that of tangible and ponderable data.

Animals too can of course be trained to develop special qualities and aptitudes, as though by education. But if we once discern what is essential, this is no valid objection. Quite apart from the fact that transitions between one thing and another are everywhere to be found, the effects of training do not merge into the animal's individual being as in the case of man. We are even told how the skills and aptitudes domestic animals acquire by their association with man or by deliberate training can be inherited. In other words, the effect is not individual but generic. Darwin describes how dogs will “fetch and carry” without previous training and without ever having seen it done. Who would say the same of human education?

[ 27 ] Now there are thinkers who see beyond the mistaken notion that man is outwardly pieced together by mere hereditary forces. They rise to the idea that a spiritual being, an individuality, precedes and helps to form the bodily existence. But many of them are not yet able to realize the fact of repeated lives on Earth, the fruits of earlier lives playing a decisive part during an intermediate spiritual form of existence. We will cite one of these thinkers, Immanuel Hermann Fichte—son of the great philosopher—who in his Anthropolgie (p. 528) sums up his observations as follows:

“The parents are by no means the progenitors in the full sense of the word. What they contribute is the organic material, and not only this; also the intermediate qualities of heart and mind and sensibility, shown in the temperament, in shades of feeling, instinctive tendencies and the like, the common source of all which we found in the imaginative power—Phantasie—using this word in the wider sense already indicated. In all these elements of a man's personality, the mingling and conjunction of the souls of his parents is unmistakable. These we may justly regard as a simple outcome of procreation, the more so since the act of procreation—as we were driven to admit—is an event in the soul-life too. Yet in all this the core and coping-stone of the individuality is not yet contained. For as a deeper penetration shows, even these subtler traits of heart and mind and feeling are but a sheath, an instrument, a vestment to contain the essentially spiritual, ideal potentialities of the man himself. True, they can further—or it may be hinder—these potentialities in their development, but they can never bring them forth out of themselves.”

A little later on (p. 532) Fichte adds:

“As to his archetypal spiritual form each human being pre-exists. Spiritually seen, two human individuals are no more like one another than are two animal species.”

These ideas only go so far as to allow that a spiritual being enters the physical, bodily nature of man to indwell it. But as they ail to attribute the form-giving powers of this being to causes originating in former lives, a fresh spiritual being would have to issue from the Divine Source of all, every time a human personality arose. On this assumption it would not be possible to explain the undoubted relationship between the innate tendencies which work their way outward from a man's inner being, and what comes to meet this inner being from his external, earthly and social environment during the course of his life. The inner being of man, springing for each single one—as it were, new-born—from the Divine Fount, would then confront what is to meet him in the earthly life as a complete stranger. This will only not be the case as indeed we know it is not—if the man's inner being has already been connected with this inner world and is not living in it for the first time. An open-minded teacher and educator can attain this perception: “What I am bringing to my pupil out of the fruits of human life on Earth is to a great extent foreign to his mere hereditary endowment, and yet it somehow touches him as though he had already been a participant—partaking in the work to which the fruits are due.”

Only repeated lives on Earth—taken together with the events in the spiritual realm between, as shown by spiritual science—can give a satisfying explanation of the life of present-day mankind when looked at in an all-round way. We say expressly, “present-day mankind.” Spiritual research reveals that there was a time when the cycle of man's earthly lives first began. Moreover the conditions then obtaining for the entry of his spiritual being into the bodily sheaths differed from those of today. In the next chapters we shall be going back to that primeval state of man, and in so doing it will emerge from the results of spiritual science how he evolved into his present form, in close connection with the evolution of the Earth as such. Then too it will be possible to indicate more fully how the spiritual core of man's being enters from supersensible worlds into the bodily vestments, and how the spiritual law of causation—how human destiny works itself out.

Schlaf und Tod

[ 1 ] Man kann das Wesen des wachen Bewusstseins nicht durchdringen ohne die Beobachtung desjenigen Zustandes, welchen der Mensch während des Schlafens durchlebt; und man kann dem Rätsel des Lebens nicht beikommen, ohne den Tod zu betrachten. Für einen Menschen, in dem kein Gefühl lebt von der Bedeutung der übersinnlichen Erkenntnis, können sich schon daraus Bedenken gegen diese ergeben, wie sie ihre Betrachtungen des Schlafes und des Todes treibt. Diese Erkenntnis kann die Beweggründe würdigen, aus denen solche Bedenken entspringen. Denn es ist nichts Unbegreifliches, wenn jemand sagt, der Mensch sei für das tätige, wirksame Leben da und sein Schaffen beruhe auf der Hingabe an dieses. Und die Vertiefung in Zustände wie Schlaf und Tod könne nur aus dem Sinn für müßige Träumerei entspringen und zu nichts anderem als zu leerer Phantastik führen. Es können leicht Menschen in der Ablehnung einer solchen «Phantastik» den Ausdruck einer gesunden Seele sehen und in der Hingabe an derlei «müßige Träumereien» etwas Krankhaftes, das nur Personen eignen mag, denen es an Lebenskraft und Lebensfreude mangelt und die nicht zum «wahren Schaffen» befähigt sind. Man tut Unrecht, wenn man ein solches Urteil ohne weiteres als unrichtig hinstellt. Denn es hat einen gewissen wahren Kern in sich; es ist eine Viertelwahrheit, die durch die übrigen drei Viertel, welche zu ihr gehören, ergänzt werden muss. Und man macht denjenigen, der das eine Viertel ganz gut einsieht, von den andern drei Vierteln aber nichts ahnt, nur misstrauisch, wenn man das eine richtige Viertel bekämpft. Es muss nämlich unbedingt zugegeben werden, dass eine Betrachtung dessen, was Schlaf und Tod verhüllen, krankhaft ist, wenn sie zu einer Schwächung, zu einer Abkehr vom wahren Leben führt. Und nicht weniger kann man damit einverstanden sein, dass vieles, was sich von jeher in der Welt Geheimwissenschaft genannt hat und was auch gegenwärtig unter diesem Namen getrieben wird, ein ungesundes, lebensfeindliches Gepräge trägt. Aber dieses Ungesunde entspringt durchaus nicht aus wahrer übersinnlicher Erkenntnis. Der wahre Tatbestand ist vielmehr der folgende. Wie der Mensch nicht immer wachen kann, so kann er auch für die wirklichen Verhältnisse des Lebens in seinem ganzen Umfange nicht auskommen ohne das, was ihm das Übersinnliche zu geben vermag. Das Leben dauert fort im Schlafe, und die Kräfte, welche im Wachen arbeiten und schaffen, holen sich ihre Stärke und ihre Erfrischung aus dem, was ihnen der Schlaf gibt. So ist es mit dem, was der Mensch in der offenbaren Welt beobachten kann. Das Gebiet der Welt ist weiter als das Feld dieser Beobachtung. Und was der Mensch im Sichtbaren erkennt, das muss ergänzt und befruchtet werden durch dasjenige, was er über die unsichtbaren Welten zu wissen vermag. Ein Mensch, der sich nicht immer wieder die Stärkung der erschlafften Kräfte aus dem Schlafe holte, müsste sein Leben zur Vernichtung führen; ebenso muss eine Weltbetrachtung zur Verödung führen, die nicht durch die Erkenntnis des Verborgenen befruchtet wird. Und ähnlich ist es mit dem «Tode». Die lebenden Wesen verfallen dem Tode, damit neues Leben entstehen könne. Es ist eben die Erkenntnis des Übersinnlichen, welche klares Licht verbreitet über den schönen Satz Goethes: «Die Natur hat den Tod erfunden, um viel Leben zu haben.» 1«Der Tod ist ihr Kunstgriff, viel Leben zu haben» (Die Natur, Fragment) Wie es kein Leben im gewöhnlichen Sinne geben könnte ohne den Tod, so kann es keine wirkliche Erkenntnis der sichtbaren Welt geben ohne den Einblick in das Übersinnliche. Alles Erkennen des Sichtbaren muss immer wieder und wieder in das Unsichtbare untertauchen, um sich entwickeln zu können. So ist ersichtlich, dass die Wissenschaft vom Übersinnlichen erst das Leben des offenbaren Wissens möglich macht; sie schwächt niemals das Leben, wenn sie in ihrer wahren Gestalt auftaucht; sie stärkt es und macht es immer wieder frisch und gesund, wenn es sich, auf sich selbst angewiesen, schwach und krank gemacht hat.

[ 2 ] Wenn der Mensch in Schlaf versinkt, dann verändert sich der Zusammenhang in seinen Gliedern. Das, was vom schlafenden Menschen auf der Ruhestätte liegt, enthält den physischen Leib- und den Ätherleib, nicht aber den Astralleib und nicht das Ich. Weil der Ätherleib mit dem physischen Leibe im Schlafe verbunden bleibt, deshalb dauern die Lebenswirkungen fort. Denn in dem Augenblicke, wo der physische Leib sich selbst überlassen wäre, müsste er zerfallen. Was aber im Schlafe ausgelöscht ist, das sind die Vorstellungen, das ist Leid und Lust, Freude und Kummer, das ist die Fähigkeit, einen bewussten Willen zu äußern, und ähnliche Tatsachen des Daseins. Von alledem ist aber der Astralleib der Träger. Es kann für ein unbefangenes Urteilen natürlich die Meinung gar nicht in Betracht kommen, dass im Schlafe der Astralleib mit aller Lust und allem Leid, mit der ganzen Vorstellungsund Willenswelt vernichtet sei. Er ist eben in einem andern Zustande vorhanden. Dass das menschliche Ich und der Astralleib nicht nur mit Lust und Leid und all dem andern Genannten erfüllt sei, sondern davon auch eine bewusste Wahrnehmung habe, dazu ist notwendig, dass der Astralleib mit dem physischen Leib und Ätherleib verbunden sei. Im Wachen ist er dieses, im Schlafen ist er es nicht. Er hat sich aus ihm herausgezogen. Er hat eine andere Art des Daseins angenommen als diejenige ist, die ihm während seiner Verbindung mit physischem Leibe und Ätherleibe zukommt. Es ist nun die Aufgabe der Erkenntnis des Übersinnlichen, diese andere Art des Daseins im Astralleibe zu betrachten. Für die Beobachtung in der äußeren Welt entschwindet der Astralleib im Schlafe; die übersinnliche Anschauung hat ihn nun zu verfolgen in seinem Leben, bis er wieder Besitz vom physischen Leibe und Ätherleibe beim Erwachen ergreift. Wie in allen Fällen, in denen es sich um die Erkenntnis der verborgenen Dinge und Vorgänge der Welt handelt, gehört zum Auffinden der wirklichen Tatsachen des Schlafzustandes in ihrer eigenen Gestalt die übersinnliche Beobachtung; wenn aber einmal ausgesprochen ist, was durch diese gefunden werden kann, dann ist dieses für ein wahrhaft unbefangenes Denken ohne weiteres verständlich. Denn die Vorgänge der verborgenen Welt zeigen sich in ihren Wirkungen in der offenbaren. Ersieht man, wie das, was die übersinnliche Betrachtung angibt, die sinnenfälligen Vorgänge verständlich macht, so ist eine solche Bestätigung durch das Leben der Beweis, den man für diese Dinge verlangen kann. Wer nicht die später anzugebenden Mittel zur Erlangung der übersinnlichen Beobachtung gebrauchen will, der kann die folgende Erfahrung machen. Er kann zunächst die Angaben der übersinnlichen Erkenntnis hinnehmen und dann sie auf die offenbaren Dinge seiner Erfahrung anwenden. Er kann auf diese Art finden, dass das Leben dadurch klar und verständlich wird. Und er wird zu dieser Überzeugung um so mehr kommen, je genauer und eingehender er das gewöhnliche Leben betrachtet.

[ 3 ] Wenn auch der Astralleib während des Schlafes keine Vorstellungen erlebt, wenn er auch nicht Lust und Leid und ähnliches erfährt: er bleibt nicht untätig. Ihm obliegt vielmehr gerade im Schlafzustande eine rege Tätigkeit. Es ist eine Tätigkeit, in welche er in rhythmischer Folge immer wieder eintreten muss, wenn er eine Zeitlang in Gemeinschaft mit dem physischen und dem Ätherleib tätig war. Wie ein Uhrpendel, nachdem er nach links ausgeschlagen hat und wieder in die Mittellage zurückgekommen ist, durch die bei diesem Ausschlag gesammelte Kraft nach rechts ausschlagen muss: so müssen der Astralleib und das in seinem Schoße befindliche Ich, nachdem sie einige Zeit in dem physischen und dem Ätherleib tätig waren, durch die Ergebnisse dieser Tätigkeit eine folgende Zeit leibfrei in einer seelisch-geistigen Umwelt ihre Regsamkeit entfalten. Für die gewöhnliche Lebensverfassung des Menschen tritt innerhalb dieses leibfreien Zustandes des Astralleibes und des Ich Bewusstlosigkeit ein, weil diese eben den Gegensatz gegenüber dem im Wachzustande durch Zusammensein mit physischem und Ätherleib entwickelten Bewusstseinszustand darstellt: wie der rechte Pendelausschlag den Gegensatz des linken bildet. Die Notwendigkeit, in diese Bewusstlosigkeit einzutreten, wird von dem Geistig-Seelischen des Menschen als Ermattung empfunden. Aber diese Ermüdung ist der Ausdruck dafür, dass Astralleib und Ich während des Schlafes sich bereit machen, im folgenden Wachzustande am physischen und Ätherleibe wieder zurückzubilden, was in diesen, solange sie frei vom Geistig-Seelischen waren, durch rein organische — unbewusste — Bildetätigkeit entstanden ist. Diese unbewusste Bildetätigkeit und dasjenige, was im Menschenwesen während des Bewusstseins und durch dieses geschieht, sind Gegensätze. Solche Gegensätze, die in rhythmischer Folge sich abwechseln müssen. — Es kann dem physischen Leib die ihm für den Menschen zukommende Form und Gestalt nur durch den menschlichen Ätherleib erhalten werden. Aber diese menschliche Form des physischen Leibes kann nur durch einen solchen Ätherleib erhalten werden, dem seinerseits wieder von dem Astralleibe die entsprechenden Kräfte zugeführt werden. Der Ätherleib ist der Bildner, der Architekt des physischen Leibes. Er kann aber nur im richtigen Sinne bilden, wenn er die Anregung zu der Art, wie er zu bilden hat, von dem Astralleibe erhält. In diesem sind die Vorbilder, nach denen der Ätherleib dem physischen Leibe seine Gestalt gibt. Während des Wachens ist nun der Astralleib nicht mit diesen Vorbildern für den physischen Leib erfüllt oder wenigstens nur bis zu einem bestimmten Grade. Denn während des Wachens setzt die Seele ihre eigenen Bilder an die Stelle dieser Vorbilder. Wenn der Mensch die Sinne auf seine Umgebung richtet, so bildet er sich eben durch die Wahrnehmung in seinen Vorstellungen Bilder, welche die Abbilder der ihn umgebenden Welt sind. Diese Abbilder sind zunächst Störenfriede für diejenigen Bilder, welche den Ätherleib anregen zur Erhaltung des physischen Leibes. Nur dann, wenn der Mensch aus eigener Tätigkeit seinem Astralleibe diejenigen Bilder zuführen könnte, welche dem Ätherleibe die richtige Anregung geben können, dann wäre eine solche Störung nicht vorhanden. Im Menschendasein spielt aber gerade diese Störung eine wichtige Rolle. Und sie drückt sich dadurch aus, dass während des Wachens die Vorbilder für den Ätherleib nicht in ihrer vollen Kraft wirken. Seine Wachleistung vollbringt der Astralleib innerhalb des physischen Leibes; im Schlafe arbeitet er an diesem von außen. b3Der Zusammenhang von Schlaf und Ermüdung wird zumeist nicht in einer durch die Tatsachen geforderten Weise angesehen. Man denkt, der Schlaf trete ein infolge der Ermüdung. Dass diese Vorstellung viel zu einfach ist, kann jedes Einschlafen eines oft gar nicht ermüdeten Menschen beim Anhören einer ihn nicht interessierenden Rede oder bei ähnlicher Gelegenheit zeigen. Wer behaupten will, bei solcher Veranlassung ermüde eben der Mensch, der erklärt doch nach einer Methode, welcher der rechte Erkenntnisernst mangelt. Unbefangene Beobachtung muss denn doch darauf kommen, dass Wachen und Schlafen verschiedene Verhältnisse der Seele zum Leibe darstellen, die im regelmäßigen Lebensverlaufe in rhythmischer Folge wie linker und rechter Pendelausschlag auftreten müssen. Es ergibt sich bei solch unbefangener Beobachtung, dass das Erfülltsein der Seele mit den Eindrücken der Außenwelt in dieser die Begierde erweckt, nach diesem Zustand in einen andern einzutreten, indem sie im Genus der eigenen Leiblichkeit aufgeht. Es wechseln zwei Seelenzustände: Hingegebensein an die Außeneindrücke und Hingegebensein an die eigene Leiblichkeit. In dem ersten Zustande wird unbewusst die Begierde nach dem zweiten erzeugt, der selbst dann im Unbewussten verläuft. Der Ausdruck der Begierde nach dem Genusse der eigenen Leiblichkeit ist die Ermüdung. Man muss also eigentlich sagen: man fühle sich ermüdet, weil man schlafen will, nicht man wolle schlafen, weil man sich ermüdet fühle. Da nun die Menschenseele durch Gewöhnung die im normalen Leben notwendig auftretenden Zustände auch willkürlich in sich hervorrufen kann, so ist es möglich, dass sie, wenn sie sich für einen gegebenen äußeren Eindruck abstumpft, in sich die Begierde hervorruft nach dem Genus der eigenen Leiblichkeit; das heißt, dass sie einschläft, wenn durch die innere Verfassung des Menschen keine Veranlassung dazu ist.

[ 4 ] Wie der physische Leib zum Beispiel in der Zufuhr der Nahrungsmittel die Außenwelt braucht, mit der er gleicher Art ist, so ist etwas Ähnliches auch für den Astralleib der Fall. Man denke sich einen physischen Menschenleib aus der ihn umgebenden Welt entfernt. Er müsste zugrunde gehen. Das zeigt, dass er ohne die ganze physische Umgebung nicht möglich ist. In der Tat muss die ganze Erde eben so sein, wie sie ist, wenn auf ihr physische Menschenleiber vorhanden sein sollen. In Wahrheit ist nämlich dieser ganze Menschenleib nur ein Teil der Erde, ja in weiterem Sinne des ganzen physischen Weltalls. Er verhält sich in dieser Beziehung wie zum Beispiel der Finger einer Hand zu dem ganzen menschlichen Körper. Man trenne den Finger von der Hand, und er kann kein Finger bleiben. Er verdorrt. So auch müsste es dem menschlichen Leibe ergehen, wenn er von demjenigen Leibe entfernt würde, von dem er ein Glied ist; von den Lebensbedingungen, welche ihm die Erde liefert. Man erhebe ihn eine genügende Anzahl von Meilen über die Oberfläche der Erde, und er wird verderben, wie der Finger verdirbt, den man von der Hand abschneidet. Wenn der Mensch gegenüber seinem physischen Leibe diese Tatsache weniger beachtet als gegenüber Finger und Körper, so beruht das lediglich darauf, dass der Finger nicht am Leibe herumspazieren kann wie der Mensch auf der Erde, und dass für jenen daher die Abhängigkeit leichter in die Augen springt.

[ 5 ] Wie nun der physische Leib in die physische Welt eingebettet ist, zu der er gehört, so ist der Astralleib zu der seinigen gehörig. Nur wird er durch das Wachleben aus dieser seiner Welt herausgerissen. Man kann das, was da vorgeht, mit einem Vergleiche sich veranschaulichen. Man denke sich ein Gefäß mit Wasser. Ein Tropfen ist innerhalb dieser ganzen Wassermasse nichts für sich Abgesondertes. Man nehme aber ein kleines Schwämmchen und sauge damit einen Tropfen aus der ganzen Wassermasse heraus. So etwas geht mit dem menschlichen Astralleibe beim Erwachen vor sich. Während des Schlafes ist er in einer mit ihm gleichen Welt. Er bildet etwas in einer gewissen Weise zu dieser Gehöriges. Beim Erwachen saugen ihn der physische Leib und der Ätherleib auf. Sie erfüllen sich mit ihm. Sie enthalten die Organe, durch die er die äußere Welt wahrnimmt. Er aber muss, um zu dieser Wahrnehmung zu kommen, aus seiner Welt sich herausscheiden. Aus dieser seiner Welt aber kann er nur die Vorbilder erhalten, welche er für den Ätherleib braucht. — Wie dem physischen Leibe zum Beispiel die Nahrungsmittel aus seiner Umgebung zukommen, so kommen dem Astralleib während des Schlafzustandes die Bilder der ihn umgebenden Welt zu. Er lebt da in der Tat außerhalb des physischen und des Ätherleibes im Weltall. In demselben Weltall, aus dem heraus der ganze Mensch geboren ist. In diesem Weltall ist die Quelle der Bilder, durch die der Mensch seine Gestalt erhält. Er ist harmonisch diesem Weltall eingegliedert. Und er hebt sich während des Wachens heraus aus dieser umfassenden Harmonie, um zu der äußeren Wahrnehmung zu kommen. Im Schlaf kehrt sein Astralleib in diese Harmonie des Weltalls zurück. Er führt beim Erwachen aus dieser so viel Kraft in seine Leiber ein, dass er das Verweilen in der Harmonie wieder für einige Zeit entbehren kann. Der Astralleib kehrt während des Schlafes in seine Heimat zurück und bringt sich beim Erwachen neugestärkte Kräfte in das Leben mit. Den äußeren Ausdruck findet der Besitz, den der Astralleib beim Erwachen mitbringt, in der Erquickung, welche ein gesunder Schlaf verleiht. Die weiteren Darlegungen der Geheimwissenschaft werden ergeben, dass diese Heimat des Astralleibes umfassender ist als dasjenige, was zum physischen Körper im engeren Sinne von der physischen Umgebung gehört. Während nämlich der Mensch als physisches Wesen ein Glied der Erde ist, gehört sein Astralleib Welten an, in welche noch andere Weltkörper eingebettet sind als unsere Erde. Er tritt dadurch — was, wie gesagt, erst in den weiteren Ausführungen klar werden kann — während des Schlafes in eine Welt ein, zu der andere Welten als die Erde gehören.

[ 6 ] Es sollte überflüssig sein, auf ein leicht sich einstellendes Missverständnis in bezug auf diese Tatsachen hinzuweisen. Es ist aber nicht unnötig in unserer Zeit, in der gewisse materialistische Vorstellungsarten vorhanden sind. Von Seiten, auf denen solche herrschen, kann natürlich gesagt werden, es sei einzig wissenschaftlich, so etwas wie den Schlaf nach seinen physischen Bedingungen zu erforschen. Wenn auch die Gelehrten über die physische Ursache des Schlafes noch nicht einig seien: das eine stehe doch fest, dass man bestimmte physische Vorgänge annehmen müsse, welche dieser Erscheinung zugrunde liegen. Wenn man aber doch anerkennen wollte, dass die übersinnliche Erkenntnis durchaus nicht mit dieser Behauptung im Widerspruch steht! Sie gibt alles zu, was von dieser Seite gesagt wird, wie man zugibt, dass für die physische Entstehung eines Hauses ein Ziegel auf den andern gelegt werden muss, und dass, wenn das Haus fertig ist, aus rein mechanischen Gesetzen seine Form und sein Zusammenhang erklärt werden könne. Aber dass das Haus entsteht, dazu ist der Gedanke des Baumeisters notwendig. Ihn findet man nicht, wenn man lediglich die physischen Gesetze untersucht. — So wie hinter den physischen Gesetzen, welche das Haus erklärlich machen, die Gedanken seines Schöpfers stehen, so hinter dem, was die physische Wissenschaft in durchaus richtiger Weise vorbringt, dasjenige, wovon durch die übersinnliche Erkenntnis gesprochen wird. Gewiss, dieser Vergleich wird oft vorgebracht, wenn von der Rechtfertigung eines geistigen Hintergrundes der Welt die Rede ist. Und man kann ihn trivial finden. Aber in solchen Dingen handelt es sich nicht darum, dass man mit gewissen Begriffen bekannt ist, sondern darum, dass man ihnen zur Begründung einer Sache das richtige Gewicht beilegt. Daran kann man einfach dadurch verhindert sein, dass entgegengesetzte Vorstellungen eine zu große Macht über die Urteilskraft haben, um dieses Gewicht in der richtigen Weise zu empfinden.

[ 7 ] Ein Zwischenzustand zwischen Wachen und Schlafen ist das Träumen. Was die Traumerlebnisse einer sinnigen Betrachtung darbieten, ist das bunte Durcheinanderwogen einer Bilderwelt, das aber doch auch etwas von Regel und Gesetz in sich birgt. Aufsteigen und Abfluten, oft in wirrer Folge, scheint zunächst diese Welt zu zeigen. Losgebunden ist der Mensch in seinem Traumleben von dem Gesetz des wachen Bewusstseins, das ihn kettet an die Wahrnehmung der Sinne und an die Regeln seiner Urteilskraft. Und doch hat der Traum etwas von geheimnisvollen Gesetzen, welche der menschlichen Ahnung reizvoll und anziehend sind und welche die tiefere Ursache davon sind, dass man das schöne Spiel der Phantasie, wie es künstlerischem Empfinden zugrunde liegt, immer gern mit dem «Träumen» vergleicht. Man braucht sich nur an einige kennzeichnende Träume zu erinnern, und man wird das bestätigt finden. Ein Mensch träumt zum Beispiel, dass er einen auf ihn losstürzenden Hund verjage. Er wacht auf und findet sich eben noch dabei, wie er unbewusst einen Teil der Bettdecke von sich abschiebt, die sich an eine ungewohnte Stelle seines Körpers gelegt hat und die ihm deshalb lästig geworden ist. Was macht da das Traumleben aus dem sinnlich wahrnehmbaren Vorgang? Was die Sinne im wachen Zustande wahrnehmen würden, lässt das Schlafleben zunächst völlig im Unbewussten liegen. Es hält aber etwas Wesentliches fest, nämlich die Tatsache, dass der Mensch etwas von sich abwehren will. Und um dieses herum spinnt es einen bildhaften Vorgang. Die Bilder als solche sind Nachklänge aus dem wachen Tagesleben. Die Art, wie sie diesem entnommen sind, hat etwas Willkürliches. Ein jeder hat die Empfindung, dass ihm der Traum bei derselben äußeren Veranlassung auch andere Bilder vorgaukeln könnte. Aber die Empfindung, dass der Mensch etwas abzuwehren hat, drücken sie sinnbildlich aus. Der Traum schafft Sinnbilder; er ist ein Symboliker. Auch innere Vorgänge können sich in solche Traumsymbole wandeln. Ein Mensch träumt, dass ein Feuer neben ihm prasselt; er sieht im Traume die Flammen. Er wacht auf und fühlt, dass er sich zu stark zugedeckt hat und ihm zu warm geworden ist. Das Gefühl zu großer Wärme drückt sich sinnbildlich in dem Bilde aus. Ganz dramatische Erlebnisse können sich im Traume abspielen. Jemand träumt zum Beispiel, er stehe an einem Abgrunde. Er sieht, wie ein Kind heranläuft. Der Traum lässt ihn alle Qualen des Gedankens erleben: wenn das Kind nur nicht unaufmerksam sein möge und in die Tiefe stürze. Er sieht es fallen und hört den dumpfen Aufschlag des Körpers unten. Er wacht auf und vernimmt, dass ein Gegenstand, der an der Wand des Zimmers hing, sich losgelöst hat und bei seinem Auffallen einen dumpfen Ton gegeben hat. Diesen einfachen Vorgang drückt das Traumleben in einem Vorgange aus, der sich in spannenden Bildern abspielt. — Man braucht sich vorläufig gar nicht in Nachdenken darüber einzulassen, wie es komme, dass in dem letzten Beispiele sich der Augenblick des dumpfen Aufschlagens eines Gegenstandes in eine Reihe von Vorgängen auseinanderlegt, die sich durch eine gewisse Zeit auszudehnen scheinen; man braucht nur ins Auge zu fassen, wie der Traum das, was die wache Sinneswahmehmung darbieten würde, in ein Bild verwandelt.

[ 8 ] Man sieht: sofort, wenn die Sinne ihre Tätigkeit einstellen, so macht sich für den Menschen ein Schöpferisches geltend. Es ist dies dasselbe Schöpferische, welches im vollen traumlosen Schlafe auch vorhanden ist und welches da jenen Seelenzustand darstellt, der als Gegensatz der wachen Seelenverfassung erscheint. Soll dieser traumlose Schlaf eintreten, so muss der Astralleib vom Ätherleib und vom physischen Leibe herausgezogen sein. Er ist während des Träumens vom physischen Leibe insofern getrennt, als er keinen Zusammenhang mehr hat mit dessen Sinnesorganen; er hält aber mit dem Ätherleibe noch einen gewissen Zusammenhang aufrecht. Dass die Vorgänge des Astralleibes in Bildern wahrgenommen werden können, das kommt von diesem seinem Zusammenhang mit dem Ätherleibe. In dem Augenblicke, in dem auch dieser Zusammenhang aufhört, versinken die Bilder in das Dunkel der Bewusstlosigkeit, und der traumlose Schlaf ist da. Das Willkürliche und oft Widersinnige der Traumbilder rührt aber davon her, dass der Astralleib wegen seiner Trennung von den Sinnesorganen des physischen Leibes seine Bilder nicht auf die richtigen Gegenstände und Vorgänge der äußeren Umgebung beziehen kann. Besonders klärend ist für diesen Tatbestand die Betrachtung eines solchen Traumes, in dem sich das Ich gewissermaßen spaltet. Wenn jemandem zum Beispiel träumt, er könne als Schüler eine ihm vom Lehrer vorgelegte Frage nicht beantworten, während sie gleich darauf der Lehrer selbst beantwortet. Weil der Träumende sich der Wahmehmungsorgane seines physischen Leibes nicht bedienen kann, ist er nicht imstande, die beiden Vorgänge auf sich, als denselben Menschen, zu beziehen. Also auch um sich selbst als ein bleibendes Ich zu erkennen, gehört für den Menschen zunächst die Ausrüstung mit äußeren Wahrnehmungsorganen. Nur dann, wenn sich der Mensch die Fähigkeit erworben hätte, auf andere Art als durch solche Wahrnehmungsorgane sich seines Ich bewusst zu werden, wäre auch außer seinem physischen Leibe das bleibende Ich für ihn wahrnehmbar. Solche Fähigkeiten hat das übersinnliche Bewusstsein zu erwerben, und es wird in dieser Schrift von den Mitteln dazu im weiteren die Rede sein.

[ 9 ] Auch der Tod tritt durch nichts anderes ein als durch eine Änderung im Zusammenhange der Glieder des Menschenwesens. Auch dasjenige, was in bezug darauf die übersinnliche Beobachtung ergibt, kann in seinen Wirkungen in der offenbaren Welt gesehen werden; und die unbefangene Urteilskraft wird durch die Betrachtung des äußeren Lebens auch hier die Mitteilungen der übersinnlichen Erkenntnis bestätigt finden. Doch ist für diese Tatsachen der Ausdruck des Unsichtbaren im Sichtbaren weniger offenliegend, und man hat größere Schwierigkeiten, um das Gewicht dessen voll zu empfinden, was in den Vorgängen des äußeren Lebens bestätigend für die Mitteilungen der übersinnlichen Erkenntnis auf diesem Gebiete spricht. Noch näher als für manches in dieser Schrift bereits Besprochene liegt es hier, diese Mitteilungen einfach für Phantasiegebilde zu erklären, wenn man sich der Erkenntnis verschließen will, wie im Sinnenfälligen der deutliche Hinweis auf das Übersinnliche enthalten ist.

[ 10 ] Während sich beim Übergang in den Schlaf der Astralleib nur aus seiner Verbindung mit dem Ätherleib und dem physischen Leibe löst, die letzteren jedoch verbunden bleiben, tritt mit dem Tode die Abtrennung des physischen Leibes vom Ätherleib ein. Der physische Leib bleibt seinen eigenen Kräften überlassen und muss deshalb als Leichnam zerfallen. Für den Ätherleib ist aber nunmehr mit dem Tode ein Zustand eingetreten, in dem er während der Zeit zwischen Geburt und Tod niemals war, bestimmte Ausnahmezustände abgerechnet, von denen noch gesprochen werden soll. Er ist nämlich jetzt mit seinem Astralleib vereinigt, ohne dass der physische Leib dabei ist. Denn nicht unmittelbar nach dem Eintritt des Todes trennen sich Ätherleib und Astralleib. Sie halten eine Zeitlang durch eine Kraft zusammen, von der leicht verständlich ist, dass sie vorhanden sein muss. Wäre sie nämlich nicht vorhanden, so könnte sich der Ätherleib gar nicht aus dem physischen Leibe herauslösen. Denn er wird mit diesem zusammengehalten: das zeigt der Schlaf, wo der Astralleib nicht imstande ist, diese beiden Glieder des Menschen auseinanderzureißen. Diese Kraft tritt beim Tode in Wirksamkeit. Sie löst den Ätherleib aus dem physischen heraus, so dass der erstere jetzt mit dem Astralleib verbunden ist. Die übersinnliche Beobachtung zeigt, dass diese Verbindung für verschiedene Menschen nach dem Tode verschieden ist. Die Dauer bemisst sich nach Tagen. Von dieser Zeitdauer soll hier vorläufig nur mitteilungsweise die Rede sein. — Später löst sich dann der Astralleib auch von seinem Ätherleib heraus und geht ohne diesen seine Wege weiter. Während der Verbindung der beiden Leiber ist der Mensch in einem Zustande, durch den er die Erlebnisse seines Astralleibes wahrnehmen kann. Solange der physische Leib da ist, muss mit der Loslösung des Astralleibes von ihm sogleich die Arbeit von außen beginnen, um die abgenutzten Organe zu erfrischen. Ist der physische Leib abgetrennt, so fällt diese Arbeit weg. Doch die Kraft, welche auf sie verwendet wird, wenn der Mensch schläft, bleibt nach dem Tode, und sie kann jetzt zu anderem verwendet werden. Sie wird nun dazu gebraucht, um die eigenen Vorgänge des Astralleibes wahrnehmbar zu machen. Eine am Äußeren des Lebens haftende Beobachtung mag immerhin sagen: das sind alles Behauptungen, die dem mit übersinnlicher Anschauung Begabten einleuchten; für einen andern Menschen sei aber keine Möglichkeit vorhanden, an ihre Wahrheit heranzudringen. Die Sache ist doch nicht so. Was die übersinnliche Erkenntnis auch auf diesem dem gewöhnlichen Anschauen entlegenen Gebiete beobachtet: es kann von der gewöhnlichen Urteilskraft, nachdem es gefunden ist, erfasst werden. Es muss diese Urteilskraft nur die Lebenszusammenhänge, die im Offenbaren vorliegen, in der rechten Art vor sich hinstellen. Vorstellen, Fühlen und Wollen stehen unter sich und mit den an der Außenwelt von dem Menschen gemachten Erlebnissen in einem solchen Verhältnis, dass sie unverständlich bleiben, wenn die Art ihrer offenbaren Wirksamkeit nicht als Ausdruck einer unoffenbaren genommen wird. Diese offenbare Wirksamkeit hellt sich für das Urteil erst auf, wenn sie in ihrem Verlauf im physischen Menschenleben als Ergebnis dessen angesehen werden kann, was die übersinnliche Erkenntnis für das nicht-physische feststellt. Man befindet sich dieser Wirksamkeit gegenüber ohne die übersinnliche Erkenntnis wie in einem finsteren Zimmer ohne Licht. Wie man die physischen Gegenstände der Umgebung erst im Lichte sieht, so wird, was durch das Seelenleben des Menschen sich abspielt, erst erklärbar durch die übersinnliche Erkenntnis. Während der Verbindung des Menschen mit seinem physischen Leibe tritt die äußere Welt in Abbildern ins Bewusstsein; nach der Ablegung dieses Leibes wird wahrnehmbar, was der Astralleib erlebt, wenn er durch keine physischen Sinnesorgane mit dieser Außenwelt verbunden ist. Neue Erlebnisse hat er zunächst nicht. Die Verbindung mit dem Ätherleibe hindert ihn daran, etwas Neues zu erleben. Was er aber besitzt, das ist die Erinnerung an das vergangene Leben. Diese lässt der noch vorhandene Ätherleib als ein umfassendes, lebensvolles Gemälde erscheinen. Das ist das erste Erlebnis des Menschen nach dem Tode. Er nimmt das Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod als eine vor ihm ausgebreitete Reihe von Bildern wahr. Während dieses Lebens ist die Erinnerung nur im Wachzustand vorhanden, wenn der Mensch mit seinem physischen Leib verbunden ist. Sie ist nur insoweit vorhanden, als dieser Leib dies zulässt. Der Seele geht nichts verloren von dem, was im Leben auf sie Eindruck macht. Wäre der physische Leib dazu ein vollkommenes Werkzeug: es müsste in jedem Augenblicke des Lebens möglich sein, dessen ganze Vergangenheit vor die Seele zu zaubern. Mit dem Tode hört dieses Hindernis auf. Solange der Ätherleib dem Menschen erhalten bleibt, besteht eine gewisse Vollkommenheit der Erinnerung. Sie schwindet aber in dem Maße dahin, in dem der Ätherleib die Form verliert, welche er während seines Aufenthaltes im physischen Leibe gehabt hat und welche dem physischen Leib ähnlich ist. Das ist ja auch der Grund, warum sich der Astralleib vom Ätherleib nach einiger Zeit trennt. Er kann nur so lange mit diesem vereint bleiben, als dessen dem physischen Leib entsprechende Form andauert. — Während des Lebens zwischen Geburt und Tod tritt eine Trennung des Ätherleibes nur in Ausnahmefällen und nur für kurze Zeit ein. Wenn der Mensch zum Beispiel eines seiner Glieder belastet, so kann ein Teil des Ätherleibes aus dem physischen sich abtrennen. Von einem Gliede, bei dem dies der Fall ist, sagt man, es sei «eingeschlafen». Und das eigentümliche Gefühl, das man dann empfindet, rührt von dem Abtrennen des Ätherleibes her. (Natürlich kann eine materialistische Vorstellungsart auch hier wieder das Unsichtbare in dem Sichtbaren leugnen und sagen: das alles rühre nur von der durch den Druck bewirkten physischen Störung her.) Die übersinnliche Beobachtung kann in einem solchen Falle sehen, wie der entsprechende Teil des Ätherleibes aus dem physischen herausrückt. Wenn nun der Mensch einen ganz ungewohnten Schreck oder dergleichen erlebt, so kann für einen großen Teil des Leibes für eine ganz kurze Zeit eine solche Abtrennung des Ätherleibes erfolgen. Es ist das dann der Fall, wenn der Mensch sich durch irgend etwas plötzlich dem Tode nahe sieht, wenn er zum Beispiel am Ertrinken ist oder bei einer Bergpartie ihm ein Absturz droht. Was Leute, die solches erlebt haben, erzählen, das kommt in der Tat der Wahrheit nahe und kann durch übersinnliche Beobachtung bestätigt werden. Sie geben an, dass ihnen in solchen Augenblicken ihr ganzes Leben wie in einem großen Erinnerungsbilde vor die Seele getreten ist. Es mag von vielen Beispielen, die hier angeführt werden könnten, nur auf eines hingewiesen werden, weil es von einem Manne herrührt, für dessen Vorstellungsart alles, was hier über solche Dinge gesagt wird, als eitel Phantasterei erscheinen muss. Es ist nämlich für den, welcher einige Schritte in die übersinnliche Beobachtung tut, immer sehr nützlich, wenn er sich mit den Angaben derjenigen bekannt macht, welche diese Wissenschaft für Phantasterei halten. Solchen Angaben kann nicht so leicht Befangenheit des Beobachters nachgesagt werden. (Die Geheimwissenschafter mögen nur recht viel von denen lernen, welche ihre Bestrebungen für Unsinn halten. Es braucht sie nicht irre zu machen, wenn ihnen von den letzteren in solcher Beziehung keine Gegenliebe entgegengebracht wird. Für die übersinnliche Beobachtung selbst bedarf es allerdings solcher Dinge nicht zur Bewahrheitung ihrer Ergebnisse. Sie will mit diesen Hinweisen auch nicht beweisen, sondern erläutern.) Der ausgezeichnete Kriminalanthropologe und auf vielen anderen Gebieten der Naturforschung bedeutsame Forscher Moritz Benedict erzählt in seinen Lebenserinnerungen den von ihm selbst erlebten Fall, dass er einmal, als er dem Ertrinken in einem Bade nahe war, wie in einem einzigen Bilde sein ganzes Leben in der Erinnerung vor sich gesehen habe. — Wenn andere die bei ähnlicher Gelegenheit erlebten Bilder anders beschreiben, ja sogar so, dass sie mit den Vorgängen ihrer Vergangenheit scheinbar wenig zu tun haben, so widerspricht das dem Gesagten nicht, denn die Bilder, welche in dem ganz ungewohnten Zustande der Abtrennung von dem physischen Leibe entstehen, sind manchmal in ihrer Beziehung zum Leben nicht ohne weiteres erklärlich. Eine richtige Betrachtung wird diese Beziehung aber immer erkennen. Auch ist es kein Einwand, wenn jemand zum Beispiel dem Ertrinken einmal nahe war und das geschilderte Erlebnis nicht gehabt hat. Man muss eben bedenken, dass dieses nur dann eintreten kann, wenn wirklich der Ätherleib von dem physischen getrennt ist und dabei der erstere mit dem Astralleib verbunden bleibt. Wenn durch den Schreck auch eine Lockerung des Ätherleibes und Astralleibes eintritt, dann bleibt das Erlebnis aus, weil dann wie im traumlosen Schlaf völlige Bewusstlosigkeit vorhanden ist.

[ 11 ] In einem Erinnerungsgemälde zusammengefasst erscheint in der ersten Zeit nach dem Tode die erlebte Vergangenheit. Nach der Trennung von dem Ätherleib ist nun der Astralleib für sich allein auf seiner weiteren Wanderung. Es ist unschwer einzusehen, dass in dem Astralleib alles das vorhanden bleibt, was dieser durch seine eigene Tätigkeit während seines Aufenthaltes im physischen Leibe zu seinem Besitz gemacht hat. Das Ich hat bis zu einem gewissen Grade das Geistselbst, den Lebensgeist und den Geistesmenschen herausgearbeitet. Soweit diese entwickelt sind, erhalten sie ihr Dasein nicht von dem, was als Organe in den Leibern vorhanden ist, sondern vom Ich. Und dieses Ich ist ja gerade dasjenige Wesen, welches keiner äußeren Organe zu seiner Wahrnehmung bedarf. Und es braucht auch keine solchen, um im Besitze dessen zu bleiben, was es mit sich selbst vereint hat. Man könnte einwenden: ja warum ist im Schlafe keine Wahrnehmung von diesem entwickelten Geistselbst, Lebensgeist und Geistesmenschen vorhanden? Sie ist deswegen nicht vorhanden, weil das Ich zwischen Geburt und Tod an den physischen Leib gekettet ist. Wenn es auch im Schlafe mit dem Astralleibe sich außerhalb dieses physischen Leibes befindet, so bleibt es doch mit diesem eng verbunden. Denn die Tätigkeit seines Astralleibes ist diesem physischen Leibe zugewandt. Dadurch ist das Ich mit seiner Wahrnehmung an die äußere Sinnenwelt verwiesen, kann somit die Offenbarungen des Geistigen in seiner unmittelbaren Gestalt nicht empfangen. Erst durch den Tod tritt diese Offenbarung an das Ich heran, weil dieses durch ihn frei wird von seiner Verbindung mit physischem und Ätherleib. In dem Augenblicke kann für die Seele eine andere Welt aufleuchten, in dem sie herausgezogen ist aus der physischen Welt, die im Leben ihre Tätigkeit an sich fesselt. — Nun gibt es Gründe, warum auch in diesem Zeitpunkte für den Menschen nicht alle Verbindung mit der äußeren Sinnenwelt aufhört. Es bleiben nämlich gewisse Begierden vorhanden, welche diese Verbindung aufrechterhalten. Es sind Begierden, welche sich der Mensch eben dadurch schafft, dass er sich seines Ich als des vierten Gliedes seiner Wesenheit bewusst ist. Diejenigen Begierden und Wünsche, welche aus der Wesenheit der drei niedrigen Leiber entspringen, können auch nur innerhalb der äußeren Welt wirken; und wenn diese Leiber abgelegt sind, dann hören sie auf. Hunger wird durch den äußeren Leib bewirkt; er schweigt, sobald dieser äußere Leib nicht mehr mit dem Ich verbunden ist. Hätte das Ich nun keine weiteren Begierden als diejenigen, welche seiner eigenen geistigen Wesenheit entstammen, so könnte es mit dem Eintritt des Todes volle Befriedigung aus der geistigen Welt schöpfen, in die es versetzt ist. Aber das Leben hat ihm noch andere Begierden gegeben. Es hat ein Verlangen in ihm entzündet nach Genüssen, die nur durch physische Organe befriedigt werden können, trotzdem sie selbst gar nicht aus dem Wesen dieser Organe selbst herkommen. Nicht nur die drei Leiber verlangen durch die physische Welt ihre Befriedigung, sondern das Ich selbst findet Genüsse innerhalb dieser Welt, für welche in der geistigen Welt überhaupt kein Gegenstand zur Befriedigung vorhanden ist. Zweierlei Wünsche gibt es für das Ich im Leben. Solche, die aus den Leibern herstammen, die also innerhalb der Leiber befriedigt werden müssen, die aber auch mit dem Zerfall der Leiber ihr Ende finden. Dann solche, die aus der geistigen Natur des Ich stammen. Solange das Ich in den Leibern ist, werden auch diese durch die leiblichen Organe befriedigt. Denn in den Offenbarungen der Organe des Leibes wirkt das verborgene Geistige. Und in allem, was die Sinne wahrnehmen, empfangen sie zugleich ein Geistiges. Dieses Geistige ist, wenn auch in anderer Form, auch nach dem Tode vorhanden. Alles, was das Ich von Geistigem innerhalb der Sinnenwelt begehrt, das hat es auch, wenn die Sinne nicht mehr da sind. Käme nun zu diesen zwei Arten von Wünschen nicht noch eine dritte hinzu, es würde der Tod nur einen Übergang bedeuten von Begierden, die durch Sinne befriedigt werden können, zu solchen, welche in der Offenbarung der geistigen Welt ihre Erfüllung finden. Diese dritte Art von Wünschen sind diejenigen, welche sich das Ich während seines Lebens in der Sinnenwelt erzeugt, weil es an ihr Gefallen findet auch insofern, als sich in ihr nicht das Geistige offenbart. — Die niedrigsten Genüsse können Offenbarungen des Geistes sein. Die Befriedigung, welche die Nahrungsaufnahme dem hungernden Wesen gewährt, ist eine Offenbarung des Geistes. Denn durch die Aufnahme von Nahrung wird das zustande gebracht, ohne welches das Geistige in einer gewissen Beziehung nicht seine Entwicklung finden könnte. Das Ich aber kann hinausgehen über den Genus, der durch diese Tatsache notwendig geboten ist. Es kann nach der wohlschmeckenden Speise Verlangen tragen, auch ganz abgesehen von dem Dienste, welcher durch die Nahrungsaufnahme dem Geiste geleistet wird. Dasselbe tritt für andere Dinge der Sinnenwelt ein. Es werden dadurch diejenigen Wünsche erzeugt, die in der Sinnenwelt niemals zum Vorschein gekommen wären, wenn nicht das menschliche Ich in diese eingegliedert worden wäre. Aber auch aus dem geistigen Wesen des Ich entspringen solche Wünsche nicht. Sinnliche Genüsse muss das Ich haben, solange es im Leibe lebt, auch insofern es geistig ist. Denn im Sinnlichen offenbart sich der Geist; und nichts anderes genießt das Ich als den Geist, wenn es sich in der Sinnenwelt dem hingibt, durch das des Geistes Licht hindurchleuchtet. Und es wird im Genusse dieses Lichtes bleiben, auch wenn die Sinnlichkeit nicht mehr das Mittel ist, durch das die Strahlen des Geistes hindurchgehen. Für solche Wünsche aber gibt es keine Erfüllung in der geistigen Welt, für die nicht schon im Sinnlichen der Geist lebt. Tritt der Tod ein, dann ist für diese Wünsche die Möglichkeit des Genusses abgeschnitten. Der Genus an einer wohlschmeckenden Speise kann nur dadurch herbeigeführt werden, dass die physischen Organe da sind, welche bei der Zuführung der Speise gebraucht werden: Gaumen, Zunge usw. Diese hat der Mensch nach Ablegung des physischen Leibes nicht mehr. Wenn aber das Ich noch Bedürfnis nach solchem Genus hat, so muss solches Bedürfnis unbefriedigt bleiben. Sofern dieser Genus dem Geiste entspricht, ist er nur so lange vorhanden, als die physischen Organe da sind. Sofern ihn aber das Ich erzeugt hat, ohne damit dem Geiste zu dienen, bleibt er nach dem Tode als Wunsch, der vergeblich nach Befriedigung dürstet. Was jetzt im Menschen vorgeht, davon lässt sich nur ein Begriff bilden, wenn man sich vorstellt, jemand leide brennenden Durst in einer Gegend, in der weit und breit kein Wasser zu finden ist. So geht es dem Ich, insofern es nach dem Tode die nicht ausgelöschten Begierden nach Genüssen der äußeren Welt hegt und keine Organe hat, sie zu befriedigen. Natürlich muss man den brennenden Durst, der als Vergleich mit dem Zustande des Ich nach dem Tode dient, sich ins Maßlose gesteigert denken und sich vorstellen, dass er ausgedehnt sei auf alle dann noch vorhandenen Begierden, für die jede Möglichkeit der Erfüllung fehlt. Der nächste Zustand des Ich besteht darin, sich frei zu machen von diesem Anziehungsband an die äußere Welt. Das Ich hat in sich eine Läuterung und Befreiung in dieser Beziehung herbeizuführen. Aus ihm muss alles herausgetilgt werden, was an Wünschen von ihm innerhalb des Leibes erzeugt worden ist und was in der geistigen Welt kein Heimatrecht hat. — Wie ein Gegenstand vom Feuer erfasst und verbrannt wird, so wird die geschilderte Begierdenwelt nach dem Tode aufgelöst und zerstört. Es eröffnet sich damit der Ausblick in jene Welt, welche die übersinnliche Erkenntnis als das «verzehrende Feuer des Geistes» bezeichnen kann. Von diesem «Feuer» wird eine Begierde erfasst, welche sinnlicher Art ist, aber dieses so ist, dass das Sinnliche nicht Ausdruck des Geistes ist. Man könnte solche Vorstellungen, wie sie in bezug auf diese Vorgänge die übersinnliche Erkenntnis geben muss, trostlos und furchtbar finden. Erschreckend könnte es erscheinen, dass eine Hoffnung, zu deren Befriedigung sinnliche Organe nötig sind, nach dem Tode sich in Hoffnungslosigkeit, dass ein Wunsch, den nur die physische Welt erfüllen kann, dann in brennende Entbehrung sich wandeln muss. Man kann eine solche Meinung nur so lange haben, als man nicht bedenkt, dass alle Wünsche und Begierden, die nach dem Tode von dem «verzehrenden Feuer» erfasst werden, im höheren Sinne nicht wohltätige, sondern zerstörende Kräfte im Leben darstellen. Durch solche Kräfte knüpft das Ich mit der Sinnenwelt ein festeres Band, als notwendig ist, um aus dieser selben Sinnenwelt alles dasjenige in sich aufzunehmen, was ihm frommt. Diese Sinnenwelt ist eine Offenbarung des hinter ihr verborgenen Geistigen. Das Ich könnte den Geist niemals in der Form genießen, in der er sich nur durch leibliche Sinne offenbaren kann, wenn es diese Sinne nicht benutzen wollte zum Genusse des Geistigen im Sinnlichen. Doch entzieht sich das Ich auch so viel von dem wahren geistigen Wirklichen in der Welt, als es von der Sinnenwelt begehrt, ohne dass der Geist dabei spricht. Wenn der sinnliche Genuss als Ausdruck des Geistes Erhöhung, Entwicklung des Ich bedeutet, so derjenige, der ein solcher Ausdruck nicht ist, Verarmung, Verödung desselben. Wird eine derartige Begierde in der Sinnenwelt befriedigt, so bleibt ihre verödende Wirkung auf das Ich deshalb doch vorhanden. Nur wird vor dem Tode diese zerstörende Wirkung für das Ich nicht sichtbar. Deshalb kann im Leben der Genuss nach solcher Begierde neue gleichartige Wünsche erzeugen. Und der Mensch wird gar nicht gewahr, dass er durch sich selbst sich in ein «verzehrendes Feuer» hüllt. Nach dem Tode wird nur sichtbar, was ihn auch schon im Leben umgibt; und durch das Sichtbarwerden erscheint dieses zugleich in seiner heilsamen, wohltätigen Folge. Wer einen Menschen lieb hat, wird doch nicht allein zu dem an ihm hingezogen, was durch die physischen Organe empfunden werden kann. Nur von diesem aber darf gesagt werden, dass es mit dem Tode der Wahrnehmung entzogen wird. Gerade das aber wird dann sichtbar an dem geliebten Menschen, zu dessen Wahrnehmung die physischen Organe nur das Mittel waren. Ja das einzige, was diese volle Sichtbarkeit hindert, ist dann das Vorhandensein derjenigen Begierde, die nur durch physische Organe befriedigt werden kann. Würde diese Begierde aber nicht ausgetilgt, so könnte die bewusste Wahrnehmung des geliebten Menschen nach dem Tode gar nicht eintreten. So betrachtet, verwandelt sich die Vorstellung des Furchtbaren und Trostlosen, das für den Menschen die Ereignisse nach dem Tode haben könnten, wie sie die übersinnliche Erkenntnis schildern muss, in diejenige des tief Befriedigenden und Trostreichen.

[ 12 ] Die nächsten Erlebnisse nach dem Tode sind nun in noch einer Beziehung durchaus verschieden von denen während des Lebens. Während der Läuterung lebt der Mensch gewissermaßen nach rückwärts. Er macht alles dasjenige noch einmal durch, was er im Leben seit der Geburt erfahren hat. Von den Vorgängen, die dem Tode unmittelbar vorausgingen, beginnt er und erlebt alles nochmals bis zur Kindheit in rückwärtiger Reihenfolge. Und dabei tritt ihm alles geistig vor Augen, was nicht aus der geistigen Natur des Ich während des Lebens entsprungen ist. Nur erlebt er auch dieses alles jetzt in umgekehrter Art. Ein Mensch, der zum Beispiel im sechzigsten Jahre gestorben ist und der aus einer zornigen Aufwallung heraus in seinem vierzigsten Jahre jemand körperlichen oder seelischen Schmerz zugefügt hat, wird dieses Ereignis noch einmal erleben, wenn er bei seiner rückgängigen Daseinswanderung nach dem Tod an der Stelle seines vierzigsten Jahres angelangt ist. Nur erlebt er da nicht die Befriedigung, die ihm im Leben geworden ist durch den Angriff auf den andern, sondern dafür den Schmerz, der durch ihn diesem andern zugefügt worden ist. Aus dem Obigen kann man aber auch zugleich ersehen, dass nur dasjenige von einem solchen Vorgange nach dem Tode als peinvoll wahrgenommen werden kann, was aus einer Begierde des Ich entsprungen ist, die nur der äußeren physischen Welt entstammt. In Wahrheit schädigt das Ich nämlich nicht nur den andern durch die Befriedigung einer solchen Begierde, sondern sich selbst; nur bleibt ihm diese eigene Schädigung während des Lebens unsichtbar. Nach dem Tode aber wird diese ganze schädigende Begierdenwelt dem Ich sichtbar. Und zu jedem Wesen und jedem Dinge fühlt sich dann das Ich hingezogen, an dem solch eine Begierde entzündet worden ist, damit sie im «verzehrenden Feuer» ebenso wieder ausgetilgt werden kann, wie sie entstanden ist. Erst wenn der Mensch bei seiner Rückwärtswanderung in dem Zeitpunkte seiner Geburt angelangt ist, sind alle derartigen Begierden durch das Läuterungsfeuer hindurchgegangen, und nichts hindert ihn von jetzt ab an der vollen Hingabe an die geistige Welt. Er betritt eine neue Daseinsstufe. Wie er im Tode den physischen Leib, bald danach den Ätherleib abgelegt hat, so zerfällt jetzt derjenige Teil des astralischen Leibes, der nur im Bewusstsein der äußeren physischen Welt leben kann. Für die übersinnliche Erkenntnis gibt es somit drei Leichname, den physischen, den ätherischen und den astralischen. Der Zeitpunkt, in dem der letztere von dem Menschen abgeworfen wird, ist dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Zeit der Läuterung etwa das Drittel von derjenigen beträgt, welche zwischen Geburt und Tod verflossen ist. Später, wenn auf Grund der Geheimwissenschaft der menschliche Lebenslauf betrachtet werden wird, kann erst die Ursache deutlich werden, warum dies so ist. Für die übersinnliche Beobachtung sind in der menschlichen Umwelt fortwährend Astralleichname vorhanden, die abgeworfen sind von Menschen, welche aus dem Läuterungszustande in ein höheres Dasein übergehen. Es ist dies genau so, wie für die physische Wahrnehmung dort physische Leichname entstehen, wo Menschen wohnen.

[ 13 ] Nach der Läuterung tritt für das Ich ein völlig neuer Bewusstseinszustand ein. Während ihm vor dem Tode die äußeren Wahrnehmungen zufließen mussten, damit auf sie das Licht des Bewusstseins fallen könne, strömt jetzt gleichsam von innen eine Welt, die zum Bewusstsein gelangt. Auch zwischen Geburt und Tod lebt das Ich in dieser Welt. Nur kleidet sich letztere da in die Offenbarungen der Sinne; und nur da, wo das Ich mit Außerachtlassung aller Sinneswahrnehmung sich selbst in seinem «innersten Allerheiligsten» wahrnimmt, kündigt sich das in unmittelbarer Gestalt an, was sonst nur in dem Schleier des Sinnlichen erscheint. So wie die Wahrnehmung des Ich im Innern vor dem Tode vor sich geht, so von innen heraus offenbart sich die geistige Welt in ihrer Fülle nach dem Tode und nach der Läuterung. Eigentlich ist diese Offenbarung schon sogleich nach dem Ablegen des Ätherleibes da; doch legt sich vor sie hin wie eine verfinsternde Wolke die Welt der Begierden, welche noch der äußeren Welt zugekehrt sind. Es ist da, wie wenn sich in eine selige Welt geistigen Erlebens die schwarzen dämonischen Schatten mischten, welche aus den im «Feuer sich verzehrenden» Begierden entstehen. Ja nicht bloß Schatten, sondern wirkliche Wesenheiten sind jetzt diese Begierden; das zeigt sich sofort, wenn die physischen Organe vom Ich entfernt sind und dieses dadurch wahrnehmen kann, was geistiger Art ist. Als Zerrbilder und Karikaturen dessen erscheinen diese Wesen, was dem Menschen vorher durch die sinnliche Wahrnehmung bekannt geworden ist. Die übersinnliche Beobachtung hat von dieser Welt des Läuterungsfeuers zu sagen, dass sie bewohnt ist von Wesen, deren Aussehen dem geistigen Auge grauenhaft und schmerzerregend sein kann, deren Lust die Vernichtung zu sein scheint und deren Leidenschaft auf ein Böses sich richtet, gegen welches das Böse der Sinnenwelt unbedeutend wirkt. Was der Mensch an den gekennzeichneten Begierden in diese Welt mitbringt, das erscheint für diese Wesenheiten wie eine Nahrung, durch welche ihre Gewalten stets aufs neue Kräftigung und Stärkung erhalten. Das Bild, das so von einer für die Sinne unwahrnehmbaren Welt entworfen wird, kann dem Menschen weniger unglaublich erscheinen, wenn er einmal mit einem unbefangenen Blicke einen Teil der Tierwelt betrachtet. Was ist für den geistigen Blick ein grausam herumziehender Wolf? Was offenbart sich indem, was die Sinne an ihm wahrnehmen? Nichts anderes als eine Seele, die in Begierden lebt und sich durch diese betätigt. Man kann die äußere Gestalt des Wolf es eine Verkörperung dieser Begierden nennen. Und hätte der Mensch keine Organe, um diese Gestalt wahrzunehmen, er müsste das Dasein des entsprechenden Wesens doch anerkennen, wenn sich dessen Begierden unsichtbar in ihren Wirkungen zeigten, wenn also eine für das Auge unsichtbare Gewalt herumschliche, durch welche alles das geschehen könnte, was durch den sichtbaren Wolf geschieht. Nun, die Wesen des Läuterungsfeuers sind zwar nicht für das sinnliche, sondern nur für das übersinnliche Bewusstsein vorhanden; ihre Wirkungen liegen aber offenkundig da: sie bestehen in der Zerstörung des Ich, wenn ihnen dieses Nahrung gibt. Diese Wirkungen werden deutlich sichtbar, wenn sich der begründete Genus zu Unmäßigkeit und Ausschweifung steigert. Denn was den Sinnen wahrnehmbar ist, würde auch das Ich nur insoweit reizen, als der Genus in seiner Wesenheit begründet ist. Das Tier wird nur durch dasjenige in der Außenwelt zum Verlangen getrieben, wonach seine drei Leiber begehren. Der Mensch hat höhere Genüsse, weil zu den drei Leibesgliedern noch das vierte, das Ich, hinzukommt. Wenn aber nun das Ich nach einer solchen Befriedigung verlangt, die seinem Wesen nicht zur Erhaltung und Förderung, sondern zur Zerstörung dient, so kann ein solches Verlangen weder die Wirkung seiner drei Leiber noch diejenige seiner eigenen Natur sein, sondern nur diejenige von Wesenheiten, welche den Sinnen verborgen bleiben ihrer wahren Gestalt nach, die aber gerade an die höhere Natur des Ich sich heranmachen können und es zu Begierden zu reizen vermögen, die nicht mit der Sinnlichkeit zusammenhängen, doch aber nur durch diese befriedigt werden können. Es sind eben Wesen vorhanden, welche Leidenschaften und Begierden zu ihrer Nahrung haben, die von schlimmerer Art als alle tierischen sind, weil sie nicht im Sinnlichen sich ausleben, sondern das Geistige ergreifen und dieses in das sinnliche Feld herunterziehen. Die Gestalten solcher Wesen sind deshalb für den geistigen Blick hässlicher, grauenhafter als die Gestalten der wildesten Tiere, in denen sich doch nur Leidenschaften verkörpern, welche im Sinnlichen begründet sind; und die zerstörenden Kräfte dieser Wesen überragen maßlos alle Zerstörungswut, welche in der sinnlich wahrnehmbaren Tierwelt vorhanden ist. Die übersinnliche Erkenntnis muss auf diese Art den Blick des Menschen weiten als auf eine Welt von Wesen, die in gewisser Beziehung niedriger steht als die sichtbare zerstörungbringende Tierwelt.

[ 14 ] Wenn der Mensch nach dem Tode durch diese Welt hindurchgegangen ist, dann findet er sich einer Welt gegenüber, welche Geistiges enthält und die auch nur ein Verlangen in ihm erzeugt, das im Geistigen seine Befriedigung findet. Aber auch jetzt unterscheidet der Mensch zwischen dem, was zu seinem Ich gehört, und dem, was die Umgebung dieses Ich — man kann auch sagen dessen geistige Außenwelt — bildet. Nur strömt ihm das, was er von dieser Umgebung erlebt, so zu, wie während seines Aufenthaltes im Leibe ihm die Wahrnehmung seines eigenen Ich zuströmt. Während also die Umgebung des Menschen im Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod durch die Organe seiner Leiber zu ihm spricht, dringt nach Ablegung aller Leiber die Sprache der neuen Umgebung unmittelbar in das «innerste Heiligtum» des Ich. Die ganze Umgebung des Menschen ist jetzt erfüllt von Wesenheiten, welche gleicher Art sind mit seinem Ich, denn nur ein Ich hat zu einem Ich den Zutritt. So wie Mineralien, Pflanzen und Tiere den Menschen in der Sinnenwelt umgeben und diese zusammensetzen, so ist er nach dem Tode von einer Welt umgeben, die aus Wesenheiten geistiger Art zusammengesetzt ist. Doch bringt der Mensch etwas, was in ihr nicht seine Umgebung ist, in diese Welt mit; es ist dasjenige, was das Ich innerhalb der Sinnenwelt erlebt hat. Zunächst trat die Summe dieser Erlebnisse unmittelbar nach dem Tode, solange der Ätherleib noch mit dem Ich verbunden war, als ein umfassendes Erinnerungsgemälde auf. Der Ätherleib selbst wird dann zwar abgelegt, aber von dem Erinnerungsgemälde bleibt etwas als unvergänglicher Besitz des Ich zurück. Wie wenn man aus allen Erlebnissen und Erfahrungen, die zwischen Geburt und Tod an den Menschen herangetreten sind, einen Extrakt, einen Auszug machen würde, so nimmt sich das aus, was da zurückbleibt. Es ist dies das geistige Erträgnis des Lebens, die Frucht desselben. Dieses Erträgnis ist geistiger Art. Es enthält alles, was sich Geistiges durch die Sinne offenbart. Aber ohne das Leben in der Sinnenwelt hätte es nicht zustande kommen können. Diese geistige Frucht der Sinnenwelt empfindet nach dem Tode das Ich als das, was jetzt seine eigene, seine Innenwelt ist und womit es die Welt betritt, die aus Wesen besteht, die sich offenbaren, wie nur sein Ich sich selbst in seinem tiefsten Innern offenbaren kann. Wie ein Pflanzenkeim, der ein Extrakt der ganzen Pflanze ist, sich aber nur entfaltet, wenn er in eine andere Welt, in die Erde, versenkt wird, so entfaltet sich jetzt dasjenige, was das Ich aus der Sinnenwelt mitbringt, wie ein Keim, auf den die geistige Umgebung wirkt, die ihn nunmehr aufgenommen hat. Die Wissenschaft des Übersinnlichen kann allerdings nur Bilder geben, wenn sie schildern soll, was in diesem «Geisterland» vorgeht; doch können diese Bilder solche sein, welche dem übersinnlichen Bewusstsein sich als wahre Wirklichkeit darstellen, wenn es die entsprechenden, dem sinnlichen Auge unsichtbaren Ereignisse verfolgt. Was da zu schildern ist, kann durch Vergleiche mit der Sinnenwelt anschaulich gemacht werden. Denn trotzdem es ganz geistiger Art ist, hat es Ähnlichkeit in gewisser Beziehung mit der sinnlichen Welt. Wie zum Beispiel in dieser eine Farbe erscheint, wenn dieser oder jener Gegenstand auf das Auge wirkt, so stellt sich vor das Ich im «Geisterlande» ein Erlebnis wie das durch eine Farbe hin, wenn auf dasselbe ein Wesen wirkt. Nur wird dieses Erlebnis so hervorgebracht, wie innerhalb des Lebens zwischen Geburt und Tod nur die Wahrnehmung des Ich im Innern bewirkt werden kann. Es ist nicht, wie wenn das Licht von außen herein in den Menschen fiele, sondern so, wie wenn ein anderes Wesen unmittelbar auf das Ich wirkte und dieses veranlasste, sich diese Wirkung in einem Farbenbilde vorzustellen. So finden alle Wesen der geistigen Umgebung des Ich in einer farbenstrahlenden Welt ihren Ausdruck. Da sie eine andere Art der Entstehung haben, sind selbstverständlich diese Farbenerlebnisse der geistigen Welt auch von etwas anderem Charakter als die an den sinnlichen Farben. Auch für andere Eindrücke, welche der Mensch von der Sinnenwelt empfängt, muss Ähnliches gesagt werden. Am ähnlichsten den Eindrücken dieser Sinnenwelt sind nun aber die Töne der geistigen Welt. Und je mehr sich der Mensch einlebt in diese Welt, desto mehr wird sie für ihn ein in sich bewegtes Leben, das sich mit den Tönen und ihrer Harmonie in der sinnlichen Wirklichkeit vergleichen lässt. Nun fühlt er die Töne nicht als etwas, das von außen an ein Organ herankommt, sondern wie eine Macht, die durch sein Ich in die Welt hinausströmt. Er fühlt den Ton, wie in der Sinnenwelt sein eigenes Sprechen oder Singen; nur weiß er in der geistigen Welt, dass diese Töne, die aus ihm strömen, zugleich die Kundgebungen anderer Wesenheiten sind, die durch ihn sich in die Welt ergießen. Eine noch höhere Kundgebung im «Geisterland» findet statt, wenn der Ton zum «geistigen Wort» wird. Dann strömt durch das Ich nicht nur das bewegte Leben eines andern geistigen Wesens, sondern ein solches Wesen selbst teilt sein Inneres diesem Ich mit. Und ohne das Trennende, das ein jedes Beisammensein in der Sinnenwelt haben muss, leben dann, wenn das Ich von dem «geistigen Wort» durchströmt wird, zwei Wesen ineinander. Und in dieser Art ist wirklich das Beisammensein von dem Ich mit andern geistigen Wesen nach dem Tode. Vor das übersinnliche Bewusstsein treten drei Gebiete des Geisterlandes, welche sich vergleichen lassen mit drei Teilen der physischen Sinnenwelt. Das erste Gebiet ist gewissermaßen das «feste Land» der geistigen Welt, das zweite das «Meeresund Flussgebiet» und das dritte der «Luftkreis». — Was auf der Erde physische Formen annimmt, so dass es durch physische Organe wahrgenommen werden kann, das wird seiner geistigen Wesenheit nach in dem ersten Gebiet des «Geisterlandes» wahrgenommen. Von einem Kristall zum Beispiel kann da die Kraft wahrgenommen werden, welche seine Form bildet. Nur verhält sich dasjenige, was sich da offenbart, wie ein Gegensatz dessen, was in der Sinnenwelt auftritt. Der Raum, welcher in der letzteren Welt von der Gesteinsmasse ausgefüllt ist, erscheint für den geistigen Blick wie eine Art Hohlraum; aber rings um diesen Hohlraum wird die Kraft gesehen, welche die Form des Steines bildet. Eine Farbe, welche der Stein in der Sinnenwelt hat, erscheint in der geistigen wie das Erlebnis der Gegenfarbe; also ein rot gefärbter Stein ist vom Geisterland aus gesehen wie grünlich, ein grüner wie rötlich erlebt usw. Auch die anderen Eigenschaften erscheinen in ihrem Gegensatze. Wie Steine, Erdmassen und dergleichen das feste Land — das Kontinentalgebiet — der sinnlichen Welt bilden, so setzen die dargestellten Gebilde das «feste Land» der geistigen zusammen. — Alles, was innerhalb der Sinnenwelt Leben ist, das ist Meeresgebiet im Geistigen. Dem sinnlichen Blick erscheint das Leben in seinen Wirkungen bei Pflanzen, Tieren und Menschen. Dem geistigen Auge ist das Leben ein strömendes Wesen, das wie Meere und Flüsse das Geisterland durchsetzt. Besser noch ist der Vergleich mit dem Kreislauf des Blutes im Leibe. Denn während sich die Meere und Flüsse in der Sinnenwelt als unregelmäßig verteilt darstellen, herrscht in der Verteilung des strömenden Lebens im Geisterland eine gewisse Regelmäßigkeit, wie im Blutkreislauf. Eben dieses «strömende Leben» wird gleichzeitig wie ein geistiges Tönen wahrgenommen. — Das dritte Gebiet des Geisterlandes ist dessen «Luftkreis». Was in der Sinnenwelt als Empfindung auftritt, das ist im Geistgebiet so alles durchdringend vorhanden, wie die Luft auf der Erde vorhanden ist. Ein Meer von strömender Empfindung hat man sich da vorzustellen. Leid und Schmerz, Freude und Entzücken strömen in diesem Gebiete wie Wind und Sturm im Luftkreis der sinnlichen Welt. Man denke an eine Schlacht, die auf Erden geschlagen wird. Da stehen einander nicht bloß Gestalten der Menschen gegenüber, die das sinnliche Auge sehen kann, sondern Gefühle stehen gegen Gefühle, Leidenschaften gegen Leidenschaften; Schmerzen erfüllen das Schlachtfeld ebenso wie Menschengestalten. Alles, was da lebt an Leidenschaft, an Schmerz, an Siegesfreude, das ist nicht nur vorhanden, insofern es sich in sinnlich-wahrnehmbaren Wirkungen offenbart; es kommt dem geistigen Sinne zum Bewusstsein als Vorgang des Luftkreises im Geisterland. Ein solches Ereignis ist im Geistigen wie ein Gewitter in der physischen Welt. Und die Wahrnehmung dieser Ereignisse lässt sich vergleichen mit dem Hören der Worte in der physischen Welt. Deshalb sagt man: wie die Luft die Erdenwesen einhüllt und durchdringt, so die «wehenden geistigen Worte» die Wesen und Vorgänge des Geisterlandes.

[ 15 ] Und weitere Wahrnehmungen sind noch möglich in dieser geistigen Welt. Auch das ist hier vorhanden, was sich mit der Wärme und mit dem Lichte der physischen Welt vergleichen lässt. Was wie die Wärme die irdischen Dinge und Wesen alles im Geisterlande durchdringt, das ist die Gedankenwelt selbst. Nur sind die Gedanken da als lebende, selbständige Wesen vorzustellen. Was der Mensch in der offenbaren Welt als Gedanken erfasst, das ist wie ein Schatten dessen, was als Gedankenwesen im Geisterlande lebt. Man denke sich den Gedanken, wie er im Menschen vorhanden ist, herausgehoben aus diesem Menschen und als tätiges, handelndes Wesen mit einem eigenen Innenleben begabt, so hat man eine schwache Verbildlichung dessen, was das vierte Gebiet des Geisterlandes erfüllt. Was der Mensch als Gedanken in seiner physischen Welt zwischen Geburt und Tod wahrnimmt, das ist nur die Offenbarung der Gedankenwelt, so wie sie durch die Werkzeuge der Leiber sich bilden kann. Aber alles, was der Mensch an solchen Gedanken hegt, die eine Bereicherung in der physischen Welt bedeuten, das hat aus diesem Gebiete heraus seinen Ursprung. Man braucht bei solchen Gedanken nicht bloß an die Ideen der großen Erfinder, der genialen Personen. zu denken, sondern man kann bei jedem Menschen sehen, wie er «Einfälle» hat, die er nicht bloß der Außenwelt verdankt, sondern durch die er diese Außenwelt selbst umgestaltet. Soweit Gefühle, Leidenschaften in Betracht kommen, zu denen die Veranlassung in der äußeren Welt liegt, so weit sind diese Gefühle usw. in das dritte Gebiet des Geisterlandes zu versetzen; alles das aber, was in der Menschenseele so leben kann, dass der Mensch ein Schaffender wird, dass er umgestaltend und befruchtend auf seine Umwelt wirkt: das wird in seiner ureigenen, wesenhaften Gestalt offenbar im vierten Felde der geistigen Welt. — Was in der fünften Region vorhanden ist, darf mit dem physischen Licht verglichen werden. Es ist in seiner ureigenen Gestalt sich offenbarende Weisheit. Wesen, welche Weisheit in ihre Umgebung ergießen, wie die Sonne Licht auf physische Wesen, gehören diesem Gebiete an. Was beschienen wird von dieser Weisheit, das zeigt sich in seinem wahren Sinn und seiner Bedeutung für die geistige Welt, wie ein physisches Wesen seine Farbe zeigt, wenn es vom Lichte beschienen wird. — Es gibt noch höhere Gebiete des Geisterlandes; sie werden ihre Darstellung an einer späteren Stelle dieser Schrift finden. In diese Welt wird nach dem Tode das Ich eingesenkt mit dem Erträgnis, das es aus dem sinnlichen Leben mitbringt. Und dieses Erträgnis ist noch vereinigt mit jenem Teile des Astralleibes, der am Ende der Läuterungszeit nicht abgeworfen wird. Es fällt ja nur jener Teil ab, welcher nach dem Tode mit seinen Begierden und Wünschen dem physischen Leben zugewandt war. Die Einsenkung des Ich mit dem, was es aus der sinnlichen Welt sich zugeeignet hat, in die geistige Welt, lässt sich mit dem Einbetten eines Samenkorns in die reifende Erde vergleichen. Wie dieses Samenkorn die Stoffe und Kräfte aus seiner Umgebung heranzieht, um sich zu einer neuen Pflanze zu entfalten, so ist Entfaltung und Wachstum das Wesen des in die geistige Welt eingesenkten Ich. — In demjenigen, was ein Organ wahrnimmt, liegt auch die Kraft verborgen, durch welche dieses Organ selbst gebildet wird. Das Auge nimmt das Licht wahr. Aber ohne das Licht gäbe es kein Auge. Wesen, welche ihr Leben im Finstern zubringen, bilden an sich keine Werkzeuge zum Sehen aus. So aber ist der ganze leibliche Mensch herausgeschaffen aus den verborgenen Kräften dessen, was durch die Glieder der Leiber wahrgenommen wird. Der physische Leib ist durch die Kräfte der physischen Welt, der Ätherleib durch diejenigen der Lebenswelt auferbaut, und der Astralleib ist aus der astralen Welt herausgestaltet. Wenn nun das Ich in das Geisterland versetzt ist, so treten ihm eben jene Kräfte entgegen, die für die physische Wahrnehmung verborgen bleiben. Was im ersten Gebiet des Geisterlandes sichtbar wird, das sind die geistigen Wesenheiten, welche den Menschen immer umgeben und die seinen physischen Leib auch aufgebaut haben. In der physischen Welt nimmt der Mensch also nichts anderes wahr als die Offenbarungen derjenigen geistigen Kräfte, welche seinen eigenen physischen Leib auch gestaltet haben. Nach dem Tode ist er eben mitten unter diesen gestaltenden Kräften selbst, die sich ihm jetzt in ihrer eigenen, vorher verborgenen Gestalt zeigen. Ebenso ist er durch die zweite Region inmitten der Kräfte, aus denen sein Ätherleib besteht; in der dritten Region strömen ihm die Mächte zu, aus denen sein Astralleib herausgegliedert ist. Auch die höheren Gebiete des Geisterlandes lassen ihm jetzt das zufließen, aus dem er im Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod aufgebaut ist.

[ 16 ] Diese Wesenheiten der geistigen Welt wirken nunmehr zusammen mit dem, was der Mensch als Frucht aus dem vorigen Leben mitgebracht hat und was jetzt zum Keime wird. Und durch dieses Zusammenwirken wird der Mensch zunächst als geistiges Wesen aufs neue aufgebaut. Im Schlafe bleiben der physische Leib und der Ätherleib bestehen; der Astralleib und das Ich sind zwar außerhalb dieser beiden, aber noch mit ihnen verbunden. Was diese in solchem Zustande an Einflüssen aus der geistigen Welt empfangen, kann nur dienen, die während des Wachens erschöpften Kräfte wiederherzustellen. Nachdem aber der physische Leib und der Ätherleib abgelegt sind und nach der Läuterungszeit auch jene Teile des Astralleibes, die noch durch ihre Begierden mit der physischen Welt zusammenhängen, wird nun alles, was aus der geistigen Welt dem Ich zuströmt, nicht nur zum Verbesserer, sondern zum Neugestalter. Und nach einer, gewissen Zeit, über welche in späteren Teilen dieser Schrift zu sprechen ist, hat sich um das Ich herum ein Astralleib gegliedert, der wieder in einem solchen Ätherleib und physischen Leib wohnen kann, wie sie dem Menschen zwischen Geburt und Tod eigen sind. Der Mensch kann wieder durch eine Geburt gehen und in einem erneuten Erdendasein erscheinen, das nun in sich eingegliedert hat die Frucht des früheren Lebens. Bis zu der Neugestaltung eines Astralleibes ist der Mensch Zeuge seines Wiederaufbaues. Da sich ihm die Mächte des Geisterlandes nicht durch äußere Organe, sondern von innen aus offenbaren, wie das eigene Ich im Selbstbewusstsein, so kann er diese Offenbarung wahrnehmen, solange sein Sinn noch nicht auf eine äußere Wahrnehmungswelt gerichtet ist. Von dem Augenblicke an, wo der Astralleib neugestaltet ist, kehrt sich dieser Sinn aber nach außen. Der Astralleib verlangt nunmehr wieder einen äußeren Ätherleib und physischen Körper. Er wendet sich damit ab von den Offenbarungen des Innern. Deshalb gibt es jetzt einen Zwischenzustand, in dem der Mensch in Bewusstlosigkeit versinkt. Das Bewusstsein kann erst wieder in der physischen Welt auftauchen, wenn die zur physischen Wahrnehmung notwendigen Organe gebildet sind. In dieser Zeit, in welcher das durch innere Wahrnehmung erleuchtete Bewusstsein aufhört, beginnt sich nun der neue Ätherleib an den Astralleib anzugliedern, und der Mensch kann dann auch wieder in einen physischen Leib einziehen. An diesen beiden Angliederungen könnte sich mit Bewusstsein nur ein solches Ich beteiligen, welches von sich aus die im Ätherleib und physischen Leib verborgen schaffenden Kräfte, den Lebensgeist und den Geistesmenschen, erzeugt hat. Solange der Mensch nicht soweit ist, müssen Wesenheiten, die weiter in ihrer Entwicklung sind als er selbst, diese Angliederung leiten. Der Astralleib wird von solchen Wesenheiten zu einem Elternpaare geleitet, so dass er mit dem entsprechenden Ätherleib und physischen Leibe begabt werden kann. — Bevor die Angliederung des Ätherleibes sich vollzieht, ereignet sich nun etwas außerordentlich Bedeutsames für den wieder ins physische Dasein tretenden Menschen. Dieser hat ja in seinem vorigen Leben störende Mächte geschaffen, die sich bei der Rückwärtswanderung nach dem Tode gezeigt haben. Man nehme das früher erwähnte Beispiel wieder auf. Der Mensch habe aus einer Zornaufwallung heraus in dem vierzigsten Jahre seines vorigen Lebens jemand Schmerz zugefügt. Nach dem Tode trat ihm dieser Schmerz des andern als eine störende Kraft für die Entwicklung des eigenen Ich entgegen. Und so ist es mit allen solchen Vorfällen des vorigen Lebens. Beim Wiedereintritt in das physische Leben stehen nun diese Hindernisse der Entwicklung wieder vor dem Ich. Wie mit dem Eintritte des Todes eine Art Erinnerungsgemälde vor dem menschlichen Ich gestanden hat, so jetzt ein Vorblick auf das kommende Leben. Wieder sieht der Mensch ein solches Gemälde, das jetzt all die Hindernisse zeigt, welche der Mensch hinwegzuräumen hat, wenn seine Entwicklung weitergehen soll. Und das, was er so sieht, wird der Ausgangspunkt von Kräften, welche der Mensch ins neue Leben mitnehmen muss. Das Bild des Schmerzes, den er dem andern zugefügt hat, wird zur Kraft, die das Ich, wenn es nun wieder ins Leben eintritt, antreibt, diesen Schmerz wieder gutzumachen. So wirkt also das vorgängige Leben bestimmend auf das neue. Die Taten dieses neuen Lebens sind durch jene des vorigen in einer gewissen Weise verursacht. Diesen gesetzmäßigen Zusammenhang eines früheren Daseins mit einem späteren hat man als das Gesetz des Schicksals anzusehen; man ist gewohnt geworden, es mit dem aus der morgenländischen Weisheit entlehnten Ausdruck «Karma» zu bezeichnen.

[ 17 ] Der Aufbau eines neuen Leibeszusammenhanges ist jedoch nicht die einzige Tätigkeit, welche dem Menschen zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt obliegt. Während dieser Aufbau geschieht, lebt der Mensch außerhalb der physischen Welt. Diese schreitet aber während dieser Zeit in ihrer Entwicklung weiter. In verhältnismäßig kurzen Zeiträumen ändert die Erde ihr Antlitz. Wie hat es vor einigen Jahrtausenden in den Gebieten ausgesehen, welche gegenwärtig von Deutschland eingenommen werden? Wenn der Mensch in einem neuen Dasein auf der Erde erscheint, sieht diese in der Regel niemals wieder so aus, wie sie zur Zeit seines letzten Lebens ausgesehen hat. Während er von der Erde abwesend war, hat alles mögliche sich geändert. In dieser Änderung des Antlitzes der Erde wirken nun auch verborgene Kräfte. Sie wirken aus derselben Welt heraus, in welcher sich der Mensch nach dem Tode befindet. Und er selbst muss an dieser Umgestaltung der Erde mitwirken. Er kann es nur unter der Anführung von höheren Wesenheiten, solange er sich nicht durch die Erzeugung von Lebensgeist und Geistesmenschen ein klares Bewusstsein über den Zusammenhang zwischen dem Geistigen und dessen Ausdruck im Physischen angeeignet hat. Aber er schafft mit an der Umwandlung der irdischen Verhältnisse. Man kann sagen, die Menschen gestalten während der Zeit vom Tode bis zu einer neuen Geburt die Erde so um, dass deren Verhältnisse zu dem passen, was sich in ihnen selbst entwickelt hat. Wenn wir einen Erdenfleck betrachten in einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt und dann nach langer Zeit wieder in einem völlig veränderten Zustande, so sind die Kräfte, welche diese Veränderung herbeigeführt haben, bei den toten Menschen. In solcher Art stehen diese auch zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt mit der Erde in Verbindung. Das übersinnliche Bewusstsein sieht in allem physischen Dasein die Offenbarung eines verborgenen Geistigen. Für die physische Beobachtung wirkt auf die Umgestaltung der Erde das Licht der Sonne, die Wandelungen des Klimas usw. Für die übersinnliche Beobachtung waltet in dem Lichtstrahl, der von der Sonne auf die Pflanze fällt, die Kraft der toten Menschen. Dieser Beobachtung kommt zum Bewusstsein, wie Menschenseelen die Pflanzen umschweben, wie sie den Erdboden wandeln und ähnliches. Nicht bloß sich selbst, nicht allein der Vorbereitung zu seinem eigenen neuen Erdendasein ist der Mensch nach dem Tode zugewandt. Nein, er ist da berufen, an der äußeren Welt geistig zu schaffen, wie er im Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod physisch zu schaffen berufen ist.

[ 18 ] Es wirkt aber nicht nur das Leben des Menschen vom Geisterlande aus auf die Verhältnisse der physischen Welt ein, sondern umgekehrt auch die Tätigkeit im .physischen Dasein hat ihre Wirkungen in der geistigen Welt. Ein Beispiel kann veranschaulichen, was in dieser Beziehung geschieht. Es besteht ein Band der Liebe zwischen Mutter und Kind. Von der Anziehung zwischen beiden, die in Kräften der Sinnenwelt wurzelt, geht diese Liebe aus. Aber sie wandelt sich im Laufe der Zeiten. Aus dem sinnlichen Bande wird immer mehr ein geistiges. Und dieses geistige Band wird nicht nur für die physische Welt gewoben, sondern auch für das Geisterland. Auch mit andern Verhältnissen ist es so. Was in der physischen Welt durch Geistwesen gesponnen wird, das bleibt in der geistigen Welt bestehen. Freunde, die sich im Leben innig verbunden haben, gehören auch im Geisterlande zusammen; und nach Ablegung der Leiber sind sie noch in einer viel innigeren Gemeinschaft als im physischen Leben. Denn als Geister sind sie so füreinander da, wie das oben bei den Offenbarungen geistiger Wesen an andere durch das Innere beschrieben worden ist. Und ein Band, das zwischen zwei Menschen gewoben worden ist, führt sie auch in einem neuen Leben wieder zusammen. Im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes muss daher von einem Wiederfinden der Menschen nach dem Tode gesprochen werden.

[ 19 ] Was sich einmal mit dem Menschen vollzogen hat, von der Geburt bis zum Tode und von da bis zu einer neuen Geburt, das wiederholt sich. Der Mensch kehrt immer wieder auf die Erde zurück, wenn die Frucht, die er in einem physischen Leben erworben hat, im Geisterlande zur Reife gekommen ist. Doch besteht nicht eine Wiederholung ohne Anfang und Ende, sondern der Mensch ist einmal aus anderen Daseinsformen in solche übergetreten, welche in der gekennzeichneten Art verlaufen, und er wird in der Zukunft zu andern übergehen. Der Ausblick auf diese Übergangsstufen wird sich ergeben, wenn im Sinne des übersinnlichen Bewusstseins im folgenden die Entwicklung des Weltalls im Zusammenhang mit dem Menschen geschildert wird.

[ 20 ] Die Vorgänge zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt sind für die äußere sinnliche Beobachtung natürlich noch verborgener als dasjenige, was dem offenbaren Dasein zwischen Geburt und Tod als Geistiges zugrunde liegt. Diese sinnliche Beobachtung kann für diesen Teil der verborgenen Welt die Wirkungen nur da sehen, wo sie ins physische Dasein eintreten. Es muss für sie die Frage sein, ob der Mensch, der durch die Geburt ins Dasein tritt, etwas mitbringt von dem, was die übersinnliche Erkenntnis von Vorgängen zwischen einem vorigen Tode und der Geburt beschreibt. Wenn jemand ein Schneckenhaus findet, in dem nichts von einem Tiere zu merken ist, so wird er doch nur anerkennen, dass dieses Schneckenhaus durch die Tätigkeit eines Tieres entstanden ist, und kann nicht glauben, dass es sich durch bloße physische Kräfte in seiner Form zusammengefügt hat. Ebenso kann jemand, der den Menschen im Leben betrachtet und etwas findet, was aus diesem Leben nicht stammen kann, vernünftigerweise zugeben, dass es von dem stammt, was die Wissenschaft des Übersinnlichen beschreibt, wenn dadurch ein erklärendes Licht auf das sonst Unerklärliche fällt. So könnte auch da die sinnlich-verständige Beobachtung aus den sichtbaren Wirkungen die unsichtbaren Ursachen begreiflich finden. Und wer dies Leben völlig unbefangen betrachtet, dem wird sich auch das mit jeder neuen Beobachtung immer mehr als das Richtige ergeben. Nur handelt es sich darum, den richtigen Gesichtspunkt zu finden, um die Wirkungen im Leben zu beobachten. Wo liegen zum Beispiel die Wirkungen dessen, was die übersinnliche Erkenntnis als Vorgänge der Läuterungszeit schildert? Wie tritt die Wirkung dessen zutage, was der Mensch nach dieser Läuterungszeit im rein geistigen Gebiete, nach den Angaben der geistigen Forschung, erleben soll?

[ 21 ] Rätsel drängen sich jeder ernsten, tiefen Lebensbetrachtung auf diesem Felde genug auf. Man sieht den einen Menschen in Not und Elend geboren, mit nur geringen Begabungen ausgestattet, so dass er durch diese mit seiner Geburt gegebenen Tatsachen zu einem erbärmlichen Dasein vorherbestimmt erscheint. Der andere wird von dem ersten Augenblicke seines Daseins an von sorgenden Händen und Herzen gehegt und gepflegt; es entfalten sich bei ihm glänzende Fähigkeiten; er ist zu einem fruchtbaren, befriedigenden Dasein veranlagt. Zwei entgegengesetzte Gesinnungen können sich gegenüber solchen Fragen geltend machen. Die eine wird an dem haften wollen, was die Sinne wahrnehmen und der an diese Sinne sich haltende Verstand begreifen kann. Darin, dass ein Mensch in das Glück, der andere ins Unglück hineingeboren wird, wird diese Gesinnung keine Frage sehen. Sie wird, wenn sie auch nicht das Wort «Zufall» gebrauchen will, doch nicht daran denken, irgendeinen gesetzmäßigen Zusammenhang anzunehmen, der solches bewirkt. Und in bezug auf die Anlagen, die Begabungen wird eine solche Vorstellungsart sich an das halten, was von Eltern, Voreltern und sonstigen Ahnen «vererbt» ist. Sie wird es ablehnen, die Ursachen in geistigen Vorgängen zu suchen, welche der Mensch selbst vor seiner Geburt — abseits von der Vererbungslinie seiner Ahnen — durchgemacht hat und durch die er sich seine Anlagen und Begabungen gestaltet hat. — Eine andere Gesinnung wird sich durch eine solche Auffassung unbefriedigt fühlen. Sie wird sagen: es geschieht doch auch in der offenbaren Welt nichts an einem bestimmten Orte oder in einer bestimmten Umgebung, ohne dass man Ursachen voraussetzen müsste, warum dies der Fall ist. Mag auch in vielen Fällen der Mensch diese Ursachen noch nicht erforscht haben, vorhanden sind sie. Eine Alpenblume wächst nicht in der Tiefebene. Ihre Natur hat etwas, was sie mit der Alpengegend zusammenbringt. Ebenso muss es in einem Menschen etwas geben, was ihn in eine bestimmte Umgebung hineingeboren werden lässt. Mit Ursachen, die bloß in der physischen Welt liegen, ist es dabei nicht getan. Sie nehmen sich für den tiefer Denkenden so aus, als wenn die Tatsache, dass jemand einem andern einen Schlag versetzt habe, nicht mit den Gefühlen des ersteren, sondern mit dem physischen Mechanismus seiner Hand erklärt werden sollte. — Ebenso unbefriedigt muss sich diese Gesinnung mit aller Erklärung aus der bloßen «Vererbung» bei Anlagen und Begabungen zeigen. Man mag von ihr immerhin sagen: sehet, wie sich bestimmte Anlagen in Familien forterben. In zwei und einem halben Jahrhundert haben sich die musikalischen Anlagen in den Gliedern der Familie Bach vererbt. Aus der Familie Bernoulli sind acht Mathematiker hervorgegangen, die zum Teil in ihrer Kindheit zu ganz anderen Berufen bestimmt waren. Aber die «vererbten» Begabungen haben sie immer zu dem Familienberuf hingetrieben. Man mag ferner darauf verweisen, wie man durch eine genaue Erforschung der Vorfahrenreihe einer Persönlichkeit zeigen könne, dass in der einen oder der anderen Weise sich die Begabung dieser Persönlichkeit bei den Ahnen gezeigt habe und dass sie sich nur als eine Summierung vererbter Anlagen darstellt. — Wer die angedeutete zweite Art der Gesinnung hat, wird solche Tatsachen gewiss nicht außer acht lassen; sie können ihm aber nicht sein, was sie dem sind, der sich nur auf die Vorgänge in der Sinnenwelt bei seinen Erklärungen stützen will. Der erstere wird darauf hinweisen, dass sich ebensowenig die vererbten Anlagen von selbst zur Gesamtpersönlichkeit summieren können, wie sich die Metallteile der Uhr zu dieser von selbst formieren. Und wenn man ihm einwendet, dass ja doch das Zusammenwirken der Eltern die Kombination der Anlagen bewirken könne, also dieses gleichsam an die Stelle des Uhrmachers trete, so wird er erwidern: Sehet mit Unbefangenheit auf das völlig Neue hin, das mit jeder Kindes-Persönlichkeit gegeben ist; dieses kann nicht von den Eltern kommen, einfach deshalb nicht, weil es in diesen nicht vorhanden ist.c4Dass die persönlichen Gaben des Menschen, wenn sie dem Gesetz der bloßen «Vererbung» unterlägen, sich nicht am Ende, sondern am Anfange einer Blutsgemeinschaft zeigen müssten, könnte als Ausspruch natürlich leicht missverstanden werden. Man könnte sagen, ja, sie können sich da doch nicht zeigen, denn sie müssen sich ja eben erst entwickeln. Aber dies ist kein Einwand; denn wenn man beweisen will, dass etwas von einem vorhergehenden vererbt ist, so muss man zeigen, wie sich an dem Nachkommen das wiederfindet, was vorher schon da war. Zeigte sich nun, dass etwas am Anfange einer Blutsgenossenschaft da wäre, was im weiteren Verlaufe wiedergefunden würde, so könnte man von Vererbung sprechen. Man kann es aber nicht, wenn am Ende etwas auftritt, was vorher nicht da war. Die Umkehrung des Satzes oben sollte nur zeigen, dass der Vererbungsgedanke ein unmöglicher ist.

[ 22 ] Ein unklares Denken kann auf diesem Gebiet viel Verwirrung stiften. Am schlimmsten ist es, wenn von den Trägern der ersten Gesinnung diejenigen der letzteren als Gegner dessen hingestellt werden, was doch auf «sichere Tatsachen» sich stützt. Aber es braucht diesen letzteren gar nicht in den Sinn zu kommen, diesen Tatsachen ihre Wahrheit oder ihren Wert abzusprechen. Sie sehen zum Beispiel durchaus auch, dass sich eine bestimmte Geistesanlage, ja Geistesrichtung in einer Familie «forterbt» und dass gewisse Anlagen, in einem Nachkommen summiert und kombiniert, eine bedeutende Persönlichkeit ergeben. Sie vermögen durchaus zuzugeben, wenn man ihnen sagt, dass der bedeutendste Name selten an der Spitze, sondern am Ende einer Blutsgenossenschaft steht. Man sollte es ihnen aber nicht übel vermerken, wenn sie gezwungen sind, daraus ganz andere Gedanken zu bilden als diejenigen, welche nur beim SinnlichTatsächlichen stehenbleiben wollen. Den letzteren kann eben erwidert werden: Gewiss zeigt ein Mensch die Merkmale seiner Vorfahren, denn das Geistig-Seelische, welches durch die Geburt in das physische Dasein tritt, entnimmt seine Leiblichkeit dem, was ihm die Vererbung gibt. Damit ist aber noch nichts gesagt, als dass ein Wesen die Eigentümlichkeiten des Mittels trägt, in das es untergetaucht ist. Es ist gewiss ein sonderbarer — trivialer — Vergleich, aber der Unbefangene wird ihm seine Berechtigung nicht absprechen, wenn gesagt wird: dass ein Menschenwesen sich in die Eigenschaften seiner Vorfahren eingehüllt zeigt, beweist für die Herkunft der persönlichen Eigenschaften dieses Wesens ebensowenig, wie es für die innere Natur eines Menschen etwas beweist, wenn er nass ist, weil er ins Wasser gefallen ist. Und weiter kann gesagt werden: wenn der bedeutendste Name am Ende einer Blutsgenossenschaft steht, so zeigt dies, dass der Träger dieses Namens jene Blutsgenossenschaft brauchte, um sich den Leib zu gestalten, den er für die Entfaltung seiner Gesamtpersönlichkeit notwendig hatte. Es beweist aber gar nichts für die «Vererbung» des Persönlichen selbst: ja es beweist für eine gesunde Logik diese Tatsache das gerade Gegenteil. Wenn sich nämlich die persönlichen Gaben vererbten, so müssten sie am Anfange einer Blutsgenossenschaft stehen und sich dann von hier ausgehend auf die Nachkommen vererben. Da sie aber am Ende stehen, so ist das gerade ein Zeugnis dafür, dass sie sich nicht vererben.

[ 23 ] Nun soll nicht in Abrede gestellt werden, dass auf Seite derjenigen, welche von einer geistigen Verursachung im Leben sprechen, nicht minder zur Verwirrung beigetragen wird. Von ihnen wird oft viel zu sehr im allgemeinen, im unbestimmten geredet. Es ist gewiss mit der Behauptung zu vergleichen: die Metallteile einer Uhr haben sich selbst zu dieser zusammengestellt, wenn gesagt wird: aus den vererbten Merkmalen summiere sich die Persönlichkeit eines Menschen. Aber es muss auch zugegeben werden, dass es mit vielen Behauptungen in bezug auf eine geistige Welt sich nicht anders verhält, als wenn jemand sagte: die Metallteile der Uhr können sich selbst nicht so zusammenfügen, dass durch die Zusammenfügung die Zeiger vorwärtsgeschoben werden, also muss irgend etwas Geistiges da sein, welches dieses Vorwärtsschieben besorgt. Gegenüber einer solchen Behauptung baut allerdings der auf einen weit besseren Grund, welcher sagt: Ach, ich kümmere mich nicht weiter um solche «mystische» Wesen, welche die Zeiger vorwärtsschieben; ich suche die mechanischen Zusammenhänge kennenzulernen, durch welche das Vorwärtsschieben der Zeiger bewirkt wird. Es handelt sich eben gar nicht darum, nur zu wissen, hinter einem Mechanischen, zum Beispiel der Uhr, stehe ein Geistiges (der Uhrmacher), sondern bedeutungsvoll kann es allein sein, die Gedanken kennenzulernen, die im Geiste des Uhrmachers der Verfertigung der Uhr vorangegangen sind. Man kann diese Gedanken im Mechanismus wiederfinden.

[ 24 ] Alles bloße Träumen und Phantasieren von dem Übersinnlichen bringt nur Verwirrung. Denn es ist ungeeignet, die Gegner zu befriedigen. Diese sind ja im Recht, wenn sie sagen, solches Hinweisen auf übersinnliche Wesen im allgemeinen fördert in nichts das Verständnis der Tatsachen. Gewiss, solche Gegner mögen auch gegenüber den bestimmten Angaben der Geisteswissenschaft das gleiche sagen. Dann aber kann hingewiesen werden darauf, wie sich im offenbaren Leben die Wirkungen der verborgenen geistigen Ursachen zeigen. Es kann gesagt werden: man nehme einmal an, es sei richtig, was die Geistesforschung durch Beobachtung festgestellt haben will, dass der Mensch nach seinem Tode eine Läuterungszeit durchgemacht habe und dass er während derselben seelisch erlebt habe, welches Hemmnis in der fortschreitenden Entwicklung eine bestimmte Tat sei, die er in einem vorhergegangenen Leben vollführt hat. Während er dieses erlebt hat, bildete sich in ihm der Trieb, die Folgen dieser Tat zu verbessern. Diesen Trieb bringt er sich für ein neues Leben mit. Und das Vorhandensein dieses Triebes bildet jenen Zug in seinem Wesen, der ihn an einen Platz stellt, von dem aus die Verbesserung möglich ist. Man beachte eine Gesamtheit solcher Triebe, und man hat eine Ursache für die schicksalsgemäße Umgebung, in welche ein Mensch hineingeboren wird. — Ebenso kann es mit einer anderen Annahme gehen. Man setze wieder voraus, es sei richtig, was von der Geisteswissenschaft gesagt wird, die Früchte eines verflossenen Lebens werden dem geistigen Keim des Menschen einverleibt, und das Geisterland, in dem sich dieser zwischen Tod und neuem Leben befindet, sei das Gebiet, in dem diese Früchte reifen, um, zu Anlagen und Fähigkeiten umgestaltet, in einem neuen Leben zu erscheinen und die Persönlichkeit so zu gestalten, dass sie als die Wirkung dessen erscheint, was in einem vorigen Leben gewonnen worden ist. — Wer diese Voraussetzungen macht und mit ihnen unbefangen das Leben betrachtet, dem wird sich zeigen, dass durch sie alles Sinnlich-Tatsächliche in seiner vollen Bedeutung und Wahrheit anerkannt werden kann, dass aber zugleich alles das begreiflich wird, was bei einem bloßen Bauen auf die sinnlichen Tatsachen für denjenigen immer unbegreiflich bleiben muss, dessen Gesinnung nach der geistigen Welt hin gerichtet ist. Und vor allem, es wird jede Unlogik von der Art verschwinden, wie die früher angedeutete eine ist: weil der bedeutendste Name am Ende einer Blutsgenossenschaft steht, müsse der Träger seine Begabung ererbt haben. Das Leben wird logisch begreiflich durch die von der Geisteswissenschaft ermittelten übersinnlichen Tatsachen.

[ 25 ] Der gewissenhafte Wahrheitsucher, der ohne eigene Erfahrung in der übersinnlichen Welt sich zurechtfinden will in den Tatsachen, wird aber auch noch einen gewichtigen Einwand erheben können. Es kann nämlich geltend gemacht werden, dass es unzulässig sei, einfach aus dem Grunde das Dasein irgendwelcher Tatsachen anzunehmen, weil man sich dadurch etwas erklären könne, was sonst unerklärlich ist. Solch ein Einwand ist sicherlich für denjenigen ganz bedeutungslos, welcher die entsprechenden Tatsachen aus der übersinnlichen Erfahrung kennt. Und in den folgenden Teilen dieser Schrift wird der Weg angegeben, der gegangen werden kann, um nicht nur andere geistige Tatsachen, die hier beschrieben werden, sondern auch das Gesetz der geistigen Verursachung als eigenes Erlebnis kennenzulernen. Aber für jeden, welcher diesen Weg nicht antreten will, kann der obige Einwand eine Bedeutung haben. Und dasjenige, was wider ihn gesagt werden kann, ist auch für einen solchen wertvoll, der den angedeuteten Weg selbst zu gehen entschlossen ist. Denn wenn es jemand in der richtigen Art aufnimmt, dann ist es selbst der beste erste Schritt, der auf diesem Wege gemacht werden kann. — Es ist nämlich durchaus wahr; bloß weil man sich etwas dadurch erklären kann, was sonst unerklärlich bleibt, soll man etwas nicht annehmen, von dessen Dasein man sonst kein Wissen hat. Aber in dem Falle mit den angeführten geistigen Tatsachen liegt die Sache doch noch anders. Wenn man sie annimmt, so hat das nicht nur die intellektuelle Folge, dass man durch sie das Leben begreiflich findet, sondern man erlebt durch die Aufnahme dieser Voraussetzungen in seine Gedanken noch etwas ganz anderes. Man denke sich den folgenden Fall: Es widerfährt jemand etwas, das in ihm recht peinliche Empfindungen hervorruft. Er kann sich nun in zweifacher Art dazu stellen. Er kann den Vorfall als etwas erleben, was ihn peinlich berührt, und sich der peinlichen Empfindung hingeben, vielleicht sogar in Schmerz versinken. Er kann sich aber auch anders dazu stellen. Er kann sagen: In Wahrheit habe ich selbst in einem vergangenen Leben in mir die Kraft gebildet, welche mich vor diesen Vorfall gestellt hat; ich habe in Wirklichkeit mir selbst die Sache zugefügt. Und er kann nun alle die Empfindungen in sich erregen, welche ein solcher Gedanke zur Folge haben kann. Selbstverständlich muss der Gedanke mit dem allervollkommensten Ernste und mit aller möglichen Kraft erlebt werden, wenn er eine solche Folge für das Empfindungsund Gefühlsleben haben soll. Wer solches zustande bringt, für den wird sich eine Erfahrung einstellen, welche sich am besten durch einen Vergleich veranschaulichen lässt. Zwei Menschen — so wolle man annehmen — bekämen eine Siegellackstange in die Hand. Der eine stelle intellektuelle Betrachtungen an über die «innere Natur» der Stange. Diese Betrachtungen mögen sehr klug sein; wenn sich diese «innere Natur» durch nichts zeigt, mag ihm ruhig jemand erwidern: das sei Träumerei. Der andere aber reibt den Siegellack mit einem Tuchlappen, und er zeigt dann, dass die Stange kleine Körperchen anzieht. Es ist ein gewichtiger Unterschied zwischen den Gedanken, die durch des ersten Menschen Kopf gegangen sind und ihn zu den Betrachtungen angeregt haben, und denen des zweiten. Des ersten Gedanken haben keine tatsächliche Folge; diejenigen des zweiten aber haben eine Kraft, also etwas Tatsächliches, aus seiner Verborgenheit hervorgelockt. — So ist es nun auch mit den Gedanken eines Menschen, der sich vorstellt, er habe die Kraft, mit einem Ereignis zusammenzukommen, durch ein früheres Leben selbst in sich gepflanzt. Diese bloße Vorstellung regt in ihm eine wirkliche Kraft an, durch die er in einer ganz andern Art dem Ereignis begegnen kann, als wenn er diese Vorstellung nicht hegt. Es geht ihm dadurch ein Licht auf über die notwendige Wesenheit dieses Ereignisses, das er sonst nur als einen Zufall anerkennen könnte. Und er wird unmittelbar einsehen: ich habe den rechten Gedanken gehabt, denn dieser Gedanke hatte die Kraft, die Tatsache mir zu enthüllen. Wiederholt jemand solche innere Vorgänge, so werden sie fortgesetzt zu einem Mittel innerer Kraftzufuhr, und sie erweisen so ihre Richtigkeit durch ihre Fruchtbarkeit. Und diese Richtigkeit zeigt sich, nach und nach, kräftig genug. In geistiger, seelischer und auch physischer Beziehung wirken solche Vorgänge gesundend, ja in jeder Beziehung fördernd auf das Leben ein. Der Mensch wird gewahr, dass er sich dadurch in einer richtigen Art in den Lebenszusammenhang hineinstellt, während er bei Beachtung nur des einen Lebens zwischen Geburt und Tod sich einem Irrwahn hingibt. Der Mensch wird seelisch stärker durch das gekennzeichnete Wissen. — Einen solchen rein inneren Beweis von der geistigen Verursachung kann sich ein jeder allerdings nur selbst in seinem Innenleben verschaffen. Aber es kann ihn auch ein jeder haben. Wer ihn sich nicht verschafft hat, kann seine Beweiskraft allerdings nicht beurteilen. Wer ihn sich verschafft hat, der kann ihn aber auch kaum mehr anzweifeln. Man braucht sich auch gar nicht zu verwundern, dass dies so ist. Denn was so ganz und gar mit demjenigen zusammenhängt, was des Menschen innerste Wesenheit, seine Persönlichkeit ausmacht, von dem ist es nur natürlich, dass es auch nur im innersten Erleben genügend bewiesen werden kann. — Vorbringen kann man dagegen allerdings nicht, dass eine solche Angelegenheit, weil sie solchem inneren Erlebnis entspricht, ein jeder mit sich selbst abmachen müsse, und dass sie nicht Sache einer Geisteswissenschaft sein könne. Gewiss ist, dass ein jeder selbst das Erlebnis haben muss, wie ein jeder selbst den Beweis eines mathematischen Satzes einsehen muss. Aber der Weg, auf dem das Erlebnis erreicht werden kann, ist für alle Menschen gültig, wie die Methode, einen mathematischen Satz zu beweisen, für alle gültig ist.

[ 26 ] Nicht in Abrede soll gestellt werden, dass — von den übersinnlichen Beobachtungen natürlich abgesehen — der eben angeführte Beweis durch die krafthervorbringende Gewalt der entsprechenden Gedanken der einzige ist, der jeder unbefangenen Logik standhält. Alle anderen Erwägungen sind gewiss sehr bedeutsam; aber sie werden doch alle etwas haben, an dem ein Gegner Angriffspunkte finden kann. Wer allerdings sich genug unbefangenen Blick angeeignet hat, der wird schon in der Möglichkeit und Tatsächlichkeit der Erziehung bei dem Menschen etwas finden, was logisch wirkende Beweiskraft dafür hat, dass ein geistiges Wesen sich in der leiblichen Hülle zum Dasein ringt. Er wird das Tier mit dem Menschen vergleichen und sich sagen: bei dem ersteren treten die für dasselbe maßgebenden Eigenschaften und Befähigungen mit der Geburt als etwas in sich Bestimmtes auf, das deutlich zeigt, wie es durch die Vererbung vorgezeichnet ist und sich an der Außenwelt entfaltet. Man sehe, wie das junge Küchlein Lebensverrichtungen von Geburt an in bestimmter Art vollzieht. An den Menschen aber tritt durch die Erziehung mit seinem Innenleben etwas in ein Verhältnis, was ohne alle Beziehung zu einer Vererbung stehen kann. Und er kann in der Lage sein, die Wirkungen solcher äußeren Einflüsse sich anzueignen. Wer erzieht, der weiß, dass solchen Einflüssen vom Innern des Menschen Kräfte entgegenkommen müssen; ist das nicht der Fall, dann ist alle Schulung und Erziehung bedeutungslos. Für den unbefangenen Erzieher stellt sich sogar ganz scharf die Grenze hin zwischen den vererbten Anlagen und jenen inneren Kräften des Menschen, welche durch diese Anlagen hindurchleuchten und welche aus früheren Lebensläufen herrühren. Sicherlich kann man für solche Dinge nicht so «gewichtige» Beweise anführen, wie für gewisse physikalische Tatsachen durch die Waage. Aber dafür sind diese Dinge eben die Intimitäten des Lebens. Und für den, der Sinn dafür hat, sind auch solche nicht handgreifliche Belege beweisend; sogar beweisender als die handgreifliche Wirklichkeit. Dass man ja auch Tiere dressieren kann, sie also gewissermaßen durch Erziehung Eigenschaften und Fähigkeiten annehmen, ist für den, der auf das Wesentliche zu schauen vermag, kein Einwand. Denn abgesehen davon, dass sich in der Welt allerorten Übergänge finden, verschmelzen die Ergebnisse der Dressur bei einem Tiere keineswegs in gleicher Art mit seinem persönlichen Wesen wie beim Menschen. Man betont ja sogar, wie die Fähigkeiten, welche den Haustieren im Zusammenleben mit dem Menschen andressiert werden, sich vererben, das heißt sofort gattungsmäßig, nicht persönlich wirken. Darwin beschreibt, wie Hunde apportieren, ohne dazu angelernt zu sein oder es gesehen zu haben. Wer wollte ein gleiches von der menschlichen Erziehung behaupten?

[ 27 ] Nun gibt es Denker, welche durch ihre Beobachtungen über die Meinung hinauskommen, dass der Mensch durch die rein vererbten Kräfte von außen zusammengefügt sei. Sie erheben sich bis zu dem Gedanken, dass ein geistiges Wesen, eine Individualität, dem leiblichen Dasein vorangehe und dieses gestalte. Aber viele von ihnen finden doch nicht die Möglichkeit, zu begreifen, dass es wiederholte Erdenleben gibt, und dass in dem Zwischendasein zwischen den Leben die Früchte der vorigen mitgestaltende Kräfte sind. Es sei aus der Reihe solcher Denker einer angeführt. Immanuel Hermann Fichte, der Sohn des großen Fichte, führt in seiner «Anthropologie» seine Beobachtungen an, die ihn (Seite 528) zu folgendem zusammenfassenden Urteil bringen: 3Brockhaus, Leipzig 1860 «Die Eltern sind nicht die Erzeuger in vollständigem Sinne: den organischen Stoff bieten sie dar, und nicht bloß diesen, sondern zugleich jenes Mittlere, Sinnlich-Gemütliche, welches sich in Temperament, in eigentümlicher Gemütsfärbung, in bestimmter Spezifikation der Triebe und dergleichen zeigt, als deren gemeinschaftliche Quelle die ‹Phantasie› in jenem weitern, von uns nachgewiesenen Sinn sich ergeben hat. In allen diesen Elementen der Persönlichkeit ist die Mischung und eigentümliche Verbindung der Elternseelen unverkennbar; diese daher für ein bloßes Produkt der Zeugung zu erklären, ist vollkommen begründet, noch dazu, wenn, wofür wir uns entscheiden mussten, die Zeugung als wirklicher Seelenvorgang aufgefasst wird. Aber der eigentliche, schließende Mittelpunkt der Persönlichkeit fehlt hier gerade; denn bei tiefer eindringender Beobachtung ergibt sich, dass auch jene gemütlichen Eigentümlichkeiten nur eine Hülle und ein Werkzeugliches sind, um die eigentlich geistigen idealen Anlagen des Menschen in sich zu fassen, geeignet, sie zu fördern in ihrer Entwicklung oder zu hemmen, keineswegs aber fähig, sie aus sich entstehen zu lassen.» Und weiter wird da gesagt: «Jeder präexistiert nach seiner geistigen Grundgestalt; denn geistig betrachtet gleicht kein Individuum dem andern, sowenig als die eine Tierspezies einer der übrigen» (Seite 532). Diese Gedanken greifen nur so weit, dass sie in die physische Leiblichkeit des Menschen eintreten lassen eine geistige Wesenheit. Da deren gestaltende Kräfte aber nicht aus Ursachen früherer Leben hergeleitet werden, so müsste jedesmal, wenn eine Persönlichkeit ersteht, eine solche geistige Wesenheit aus einem göttlichen Urgrunde hervorgehen. Unter dieser Voraussetzung bestände aber keine Möglichkeit, die Verwandtschaft zu erklären, die ja besteht zwischen den sich aus dem menschlichen Innern herausringenden Anlagen und dem, was von der äußeren irdischen Umgebung im Laufe des Lebens an dieses Innere herandringt. Das menschliche Innere, das für jeden einzelnen Menschen aus einem göttlichen Urgrunde stammte, müsste ganz fremd gegenüberstehen dem, was ihm im irdischen Leben gegenübertritt. Nur dann wird das — wie es ja tatsächlich ist — nicht der Fall sein, wenn dieses menschliche Innere mit dem Äußern bereits verbunden war, wenn es nicht zum ersten Male in diesem lebt. Der unbefangene Erzieher kann klar die Wahrnehmung machen: ich bringe aus den Ergebnissen des Erdenlebens an meinen Zögling etwas heran, was zwar seinen bloß vererbten Eigenschaften fremd ist, was ihn aber doch so anmutet, als ob er bei der Arbeit, aus welcher diese Ergebnisse stammen, schon dabei gewesen wäre. Nur die wiederholten Erdenleben im Zusammenhang mit den von der Geistesforschung dargelegten Tatsachen im geistigen Gebiet zwischen den Erdenleben: nur dies alles kann eine befriedigende Erklärung des allseitig betrachteten Lebens der gegenwärtigen Menschheit geben. — Ausdrücklich wird hier gesagt: der «gegenwärtigen» Menschheit. Denn die geistige Forschung ergibt, dass allerdings einmal der Kreislauf der Erdenleben begonnen hat und dass damals andere Verhältnisse als gegenwärtig für das in die leibliche Hülle eintretende geistige Wesen des Menschen bestanden haben. In den folgenden Kapiteln wird auf diesen urzeitlichen Zustand des Menschenwesens zurückgegangen. Wenn dadurch aus den Ergebnissen der Geisteswissenschaft heraus wird gezeigt worden sein, wie dieses Menschenwesen seine gegenwärtige Gestalt im Zusammenhang mit der Erdentwicklung erhalten hat, wird auch noch genauer darauf hingedeutet werden können, wie der geistige Wesenskern des Menschen aus übersinnlichen Welten in die leiblichen Hüllen eindringt, und wie das geistige Verursachungsgesetz, das «menschliche Schicksal», sich heranbildet.

Sleep and death

[ 1 ] One cannot penetrate the essence of waking consciousness without observing the state through which man passes during sleep; and one cannot come to grips with the riddle of life without considering death. For a man in whom there is no feeling of the importance of supersensible knowledge, objections to it may arise from the way in which it conducts its contemplations of sleep and death. This knowledge can appreciate the motives from which such misgivings arise. For it is nothing incomprehensible when someone says that man exists for the active, effective life and that his work is based on devotion to it. And immersion in states such as sleep and death can only arise from a sense of idle reverie and lead to nothing other than empty fantasy. People can easily see in the rejection of such "fantasy" the expression of a healthy soul and in the devotion to such "idle reveries" something morbid, which may only be suitable for people who lack vitality and joie de vivre and who are not capable of "true creation". It would be wrong to dismiss such a judgment out of hand as incorrect. For it has a certain kernel of truth in it; it is a quarter truth that must be supplemented by the other three quarters that belong to it. And you only make someone who understands one quarter quite well but has no idea about the other three quarters suspicious if you fight against the one correct quarter. It must be admitted that contemplating what sleep and death conceal is pathological if it leads to a weakening, to a turning away from true life. And it is no less true that much of what has always been called secret science in the world and what is currently practiced under this name has an unhealthy, anti-life character. But this unhealthy character does not arise from true supersensible knowledge. The true facts are rather as follows. Just as man cannot always be awake, so he cannot get along with the real conditions of life in its entirety without what the supersensible is able to give him. Life continues in sleep, and the forces that work and create in waking life draw their strength and refreshment from what sleep gives them. So it is with what man can observe in the manifest world. The realm of the world is wider than the field of this observation. And what man recognizes in the visible must be supplemented and fertilized by what he is able to know about the invisible worlds. A person who does not repeatedly draw strength from the slack forces of sleep must lead his life to destruction; likewise, an observation of the world that is not fertilized by the knowledge of the hidden must lead to desolation. And it is similar with "death". Living beings are subject to death so that new life can arise. It is precisely the knowledge of the supersensible that sheds clear light on Goethe's beautiful sentence: "Nature invented death in order to have plenty of life." 1"Death is her artifice to have much life" (Die Natur, Fragment) Just as there could be no life in the ordinary sense without death, so there can be no real knowledge of the visible world without insight into the supersensible. All cognition of the visible must be immersed again and again in the invisible in order to develop. Thus it is evident that the science of the supersensible makes the life of revealed knowledge possible in the first place; it never weakens life when it emerges in its true form; it strengthens it and makes it fresh and healthy again and again when it, dependent on itself, has made itself weak and ill.

[ 2 ] When man sinks into sleep, the context in his limbs changes. That which lies in the sleeping person's resting place contains the physical body and the etheric body, but not the astral body and not the ego. Because the etheric body remains connected with the physical body in sleep, the life effects continue. For at the moment when the physical body would be left to itself, it would have to disintegrate. But what is extinguished in sleep is the imagination, suffering and pleasure, joy and sorrow, the ability to express a conscious will, and similar facts of existence. But the astral body is the carrier of all this. For an unbiased judgment, the opinion that in sleep the astral body is destroyed with all pleasure and suffering, with the whole world of imagination and will, is of course out of the question. It is present in a different state. For the human ego and the astral body not only to be filled with pleasure and suffering and all the other things mentioned, but also to have a conscious perception of them, it is necessary for the astral body to be connected with the physical body and the etheric body. In waking it is this, in sleeping it is not. It has pulled itself out of it. It has taken on a different kind of existence than the one it has during its connection with the physical body and etheric body. It is now the task of cognition of the supersensible to observe this other kind of existence in the astral body. For observation in the outer world, the astral body disappears in sleep; the supersensible view now has to follow it in its life until it again takes possession of the physical body and etheric body on awakening. As in all cases in which it is a question of recognizing the hidden things and processes of the world, supersensible observation is necessary in order to find the real facts of the sleep state in their own form; but once it has been expressed what can be found through this, then it is readily comprehensible to a truly unbiased mind. For the processes of the hidden world show themselves in their effects in the revealed world. If one sees how that which is indicated by supersensible observation makes the sensible processes intelligible, then such a confirmation through life is the proof that one can demand for these things. Whoever does not wish to use the means to be indicated later for the attainment of supersensible observation can make the following experience. He can first accept the indications of supersensible knowledge and then apply them to the manifest things of his experience. In this way he can find that life becomes clear and understandable. And he will come to this conviction all the more, the more closely and thoroughly he observes ordinary life.

[ 3 ] Although the astral body does not experience ideas during sleep, even if it does not experience pleasure and suffering and the like, it does not remain inactive. Rather, it is responsible for a lively activity precisely in the state of sleep. It is an activity into which it must enter again and again in rhythmic succession when it has been active for a time in communion with the physical and the etheric body. Just as a clock pendulum, after having swung to the left and returned to its central position, must swing to the right through the force gathered during this swing: so the astral body and the ego in its womb, after having been active for some time in the physical and etheric bodies, must, through the results of this activity, develop their activity for a subsequent time in a soul-spiritual environment without a body. In the ordinary state of human life, unconsciousness occurs within this body-free state of the astral body and the ego, because this represents the opposite of the state of consciousness developed in the waking state through being together with the physical and etheric body: just as the right pendulum swing forms the opposite of the left. The necessity to enter this unconsciousness is felt by the spiritual-soul of the human being as fatigue. But this fatigue is the expression of the fact that during sleep the astral body and the ego prepare themselves, in the following waking state, to re-form in the physical and etheric body what, as long as they were free from the spiritual-soul, has arisen in them through purely organic - unconscious - formative activity. This unconscious formative activity and what happens in the human being during and through consciousness are opposites. Such opposites that must alternate in rhythmic sequence. - The physical body can only be given the form and shape it deserves for the human being through the human etheric body. But this human form of the physical body can only be maintained by such an etheric body, which in turn is supplied with the corresponding forces by the astral body. The etheric body is the molder, the architect of the physical body. However, it can only form in the right sense if it receives the stimulus for the way it has to form from the astral body. In this are the models according to which the etheric body gives its form to the physical body. During waking, the astral body is not filled with these models for the physical body, or at least only to a certain degree. For during waking the soul puts its own images in the place of these models. When man directs his senses towards his surroundings, he forms images in his imagination through perception, which are images of the world around him. These images are initially disturbances for those images that stimulate the etheric body to maintain the physical body. Only if the human being could, through his own activity, supply his astral body with those images that can give the etheric body the right stimulation, then such a disturbance would not exist. But it is precisely this disturbance that plays an important role in human existence. And it expresses itself in the fact that during waking hours the etheric body does not receive the full power of the images. The astral body accomplishes its waking work within the physical body; during sleep it works on the physical body from outside. b3The connection between sleep and fatigue is not usually regarded in the way required by the facts. Sleep is thought to occur as a result of fatigue. The fact that this idea is far too simple can be seen every time a person who is often not tired at all falls asleep while listening to a speech that does not interest him or on a similar occasion. Anyone who wants to claim that a person becomes tired on such occasions is using a method that lacks the proper seriousness of knowledge. Unbiased observation must come to the conclusion that waking and sleeping represent different relations of the soul to the body, which in the regular course of life must occur in rhythmic succession like the left and right swing of a pendulum. Such unbiased observation reveals that the soul's being filled with the impressions of the outside world awakens in it the desire to enter into another state after this one by being absorbed in the genus of its own corporeality. Two states of the soul alternate: Surrender to external impressions and surrender to one's own corporeality. In the first state, the desire for the second is unconsciously generated, which itself then runs in the unconscious. The expression of the desire for the enjoyment of one's own corporeality is fatigue. We must therefore actually say that we feel tired because we want to sleep, not that we want to sleep because we feel tired. Now, since the human soul can, through habituation, also arbitrarily evoke in itself the states that necessarily occur in normal life, it is possible that, when it becomes numb to a given external impression, it evokes in itself the desire for the pleasure of its own corporeality; that is, it falls asleep when there is no reason to do so due to the person's inner constitution.

[ 4 ] For example, just as the physical body needs the outside world, with which it is of the same kind, for the supply of food, something similar is also the case for the astral body. Imagine a physical human body removed from the world around it. It would have to perish. This shows that it is not possible without the whole physical environment. In fact, the whole earth must be just as it is if there are to be physical human bodies on it. In truth, this whole human body is only a part of the earth, indeed in a broader sense of the whole physical universe. In this respect it behaves like, for example, the finger of a hand in relation to the whole human body. Separate the finger from the hand and it cannot remain a finger. It withers away. The same would happen to the human body if it were removed from the body of which it is a part, from the conditions of life which the earth provides. Raise it a sufficient number of miles above the surface of the earth, and it will perish as a finger spoils when it is cut off from the hand. If man pays less attention to this fact in relation to his physical body than to his finger and body, it is merely because the finger cannot walk around on the body as man can on the earth, and for the latter the dependence is therefore more easily apparent.

[ 5 ] Just as the physical body is embedded in the physical world to which it belongs, so the astral body belongs to its own. Only it is torn out of this world through waking life. You can visualize what is going on there with a comparison. Imagine a vessel of water. A drop is nothing separate within this whole mass of water. But take a small sponge and use it to suck a drop out of the whole mass of water. This is what happens to the human astral body on awakening. During sleep it is in a world that is the same as itself. It forms something that belongs to it in a certain way. On awakening, the physical body and the etheric body absorb it. They fill themselves with him. They contain the organs through which he perceives the outer world. But in order to come to this perception, he must separate himself from his world. From this world, however, it can only receive the models it needs for the etheric body. - For example, just as the physical body receives food from its surroundings, so the astral body receives the images of the world around it during the state of sleep. It actually lives outside the physical and etheric body in the universe. In the same universe from which the whole human being is born. In this universe is the source of the images through which man receives his form. He is harmoniously integrated into this universe. And during waking he lifts himself out of this comprehensive harmony in order to come to external perception. During sleep his astral body returns to this harmony of the universe. On awakening from this harmony, it introduces so much power into its bodies that it can again do without dwelling in the harmony for some time. During sleep, the astral body returns to its home and, on awakening, brings newly strengthened forces with it into life. The possession that the astral body brings with it on awakening finds its outward expression in the refreshment that a healthy sleep gives. The further explanations of the secret science will show that this home of the astral body is more comprehensive than that which belongs to the physical body in the narrower sense of the physical environment. While man as a physical being is a member of the earth, his astral body belongs to worlds in which still other world bodies are embedded than our earth. As a result - which, as mentioned, can only become clear in the further explanations - during sleep he enters a world to which worlds other than the earth belong.

[ 6 ] It should be superfluous to point out an easily occurring misunderstanding with regard to these facts. But it is not unnecessary in our time, in which certain materialistic conceptions are present. On the part of those who hold such views, it can of course be said that it is only scientific to investigate something like sleep according to its physical conditions. Even if scholars are not yet agreed on the physical cause of sleep, one thing is certain, namely that certain physical processes must be assumed to underlie this phenomenon. But if only one would recognize that supersensible knowledge does not contradict this assertion! It admits everything that is said from this side, just as one admits that for the physical formation of a house one brick must be laid on top of another, and that when the house is finished, its form and its connection can be explained from purely mechanical laws. But the idea of the master builder is necessary for the house to come into being. It cannot be found by merely examining the physical laws. - Just as behind the physical laws which make the house explainable are the thoughts of its creator, so behind what physical science quite correctly puts forward is that which is spoken of through supersensible knowledge. Certainly, this comparison is often made when we speak of the justification of a spiritual background to the world. And one can find it trivial. But in such matters it is not a question of being familiar with certain concepts, but of attaching the right weight to them to justify something. One can be prevented from doing so simply because opposing ideas have too great a power over the power of judgment to feel this weight in the right way.

[ 7 ] Dreaming is an intermediate state between waking and sleeping. What dream experiences offer to a sensible contemplation is the colorful confusion of a world of images, which nevertheless also contains something of rule and law. Rising and falling, often in a confused sequence, seems at first to show this world. In his dream life, man is unbound by the law of waking consciousness, which chains him to the perception of the senses and to the rules of his power of judgment. And yet the dream has something of mysterious laws which are attractive and appealing to the human imagination and which are the deeper cause of the fact that one always likes to compare the beautiful play of the imagination, as it underlies artistic feeling, with "dreaming". You only have to remember a few characteristic dreams and you will find this confirmed. A person dreams, for example, that he chases away a dog rushing at him. He wakes up and finds himself unconsciously pushing off a part of the comforter that has settled on an unfamiliar part of his body and has therefore become a nuisance. What does dream life make of this sensually perceptible process? What the senses would perceive in the waking state, the sleeping life initially leaves completely unconscious. However, it retains something essential, namely the fact that the person wants to ward something off. And it spins a pictorial process around this. The images as such are echoes from waking daily life. The way in which they are taken from this has something arbitrary about it. Everyone has the feeling that the dream could also conjure up other images for him on the same external occasion. But they express the feeling that man has something to ward off symbolically. The dream creates symbols; it is a symbolizer. Inner processes can also be transformed into such dream symbols. A person dreams that a fire is roaring next to him; he sees the flames in his dream. He wakes up and feels that he has covered himself up too much and has become too warm. The feeling of too much warmth is expressed symbolically in the picture. Very dramatic experiences can take place in dreams. For example, someone dreams that he is standing on a precipice. He sees a child running towards him. The dream makes him experience all the agony of the thought: if only the child would not be inattentive and fall into the depths. He sees it fall and hears the muffled thud of the body below. He wakes up and hears that an object hanging on the wall of the room has come loose and made a muffled sound when it fell. Dream life expresses this simple process in a process that takes place in exciting images. - For the time being, there is no need to ponder how it is that in the last example the moment of the dull impact of an object is broken down into a series of processes that seem to extend over a certain period of time; one need only consider how the dream transforms what the waking sensory perception would present into an image.

[ 8 ] You see: as soon as the senses cease their activity, a creative quality asserts itself for the human being. This is the same creative quality that is also present in full dreamless sleep and which represents that state of the soul that appears as the opposite of the waking state of the soul. If this dreamless sleep is to occur, the astral body must be withdrawn from the etheric body and the physical body. During dreaming it is separated from the physical body in so far as it no longer has any connection with its sense organs; however, it still maintains a certain connection with the etheric body. The fact that the processes of the astral body can be perceived in images comes from its connection with the etheric body. The moment this connection ceases, the images sink into the darkness of unconsciousness, and dreamless sleep is there. However, the arbitrary and often absurd nature of the dream images stems from the fact that the astral body cannot relate its images to the correct objects and processes of the external environment due to its separation from the sensory organs of the physical body. The observation of such a dream, in which the ego splits to a certain extent, is particularly clarifying for this fact. For example, if someone dreams that as a pupil he cannot answer a question put to him by the teacher, while the teacher himself answers it immediately afterwards. Because the dreamer cannot use the organs of perception of his physical body, he is unable to relate the two processes to himself as the same person. Therefore, in order to recognize himself as a permanent self, man must first be equipped with external organs of perception. Only then, if man had acquired the ability to become aware of his ego in a way other than through such organs of perception, would the permanent ego also be perceptible to him outside his physical body. The supersensible consciousness has to acquire such abilities, and the means for this will be discussed further in this paper.

[ 9 ] Death, too, occurs through nothing other than a change in the coherence of the members of the human being. That which is revealed by supersensible observation can also be seen in its effects in the manifest world; and the impartial power of judgment will find the communications of supersensible knowledge confirmed by the observation of external life. But for these facts the expression of the invisible in the visible is less obvious, and one has greater difficulty in fully feeling the weight of what in the processes of external life speaks in confirmation of the communications of supersensible knowledge in this field. It is even more obvious here than for some of the things already discussed in this paper to simply declare these communications to be figments of the imagination, if one wants to close oneself off to the realization of how the sensible contains the clear indication of the supersensible.

[ 10 ] While the astral body only separates from its connection with the etheric body and the physical body during the transition to sleep, but the latter remain connected, the separation of the physical body from the etheric body occurs at death. The physical body is left to its own forces and must therefore disintegrate as a corpse. For the etheric body, however, a state has now occurred at death in which it was never during the time between birth and death, apart from certain exceptional states which will be discussed later. It is now united with its astral body without the physical body being present. For the etheric body and the astral body do not separate immediately after death. They are held together for a time by a force which it is easy to understand must be present. If it were not present, the etheric body could not separate from the physical body. For it is held together with the physical body: this is shown by sleep, where the astral body is unable to tear these two parts of the human being apart. This power comes into effect at death. It separates the etheric body from the physical, so that the former is now connected with the astral body. Psychic observation shows that this connection is different for different people after death. The duration is measured in days. For the time being, this duration will only be mentioned here in passing. - Later, the astral body also separates from its etheric body and goes on its way without it. During the connection of the two bodies, the human being is in a state through which he can perceive the experiences of his astral body. As long as the physical body is there, the work from outside must begin as soon as the astral body is detached from it in order to refresh the worn-out organs. If the physical body is detached, this work ceases. But the power that is used on it when the person is asleep remains after death, and it can now be used for other purposes. It is now used to make the astral body's own processes perceptible. An observer who is attached to the external aspects of life may say that these are all assertions which are plausible to those gifted with supersensible perception, but that there is no possibility for another person to penetrate their truth. This is not the case. Whatever supersensible knowledge observes in this field, which is remote from ordinary vision, can be grasped by ordinary judgment once it has been found. This power of judgment must only place before it in the right way the connections of life which are present in the manifest. Imagination, feeling and volition stand among themselves and with the experiences made by man in the external world in such a relationship that they remain incomprehensible if the nature of their revealed activity is not taken as the expression of an unrevealed one. This revelatory effectiveness only becomes clearer for judgment when it can be seen in its course in physical human life as the result of what supersensible knowledge establishes for the non-physical. Without supersensible knowledge, one finds oneself in the face of this activity as in a dark room without light. Just as the physical objects of the environment can only be seen in the light, so what takes place through the soul life of man can only be explained through supersensible knowledge. While the human being is connected with his physical body, the outer world comes into consciousness in images; after the shedding of this body, what the astral body experiences becomes perceptible when it is not connected with this outer world through any physical sense organs. At first it has no new experiences. The connection with the etheric body prevents it from experiencing anything new. What he does have, however, is the memory of the past life. The etheric body, which is still present, makes this memory appear as a comprehensive, vivid painting. This is man's first experience after death. He perceives life between birth and death as a series of pictures spread out before him. During this life, memory is only present in the waking state, when the human being is connected to his physical body. It is only present to the extent that this body allows it. The soul loses nothing of what makes an impression on it in life. If the physical body were a perfect tool for this purpose, it should be possible at every moment of life to conjure up its entire past before the soul. This obstacle ceases with death. As long as the etheric body remains with the human being, there is a certain perfection of memory. But it disappears to the extent that the etheric body loses the form it had during its stay in the physical body and which is similar to the physical body. This is also the reason why the astral body separates from the etheric body after some time. It can only remain united with it as long as its form corresponding to the physical body lasts. - During life between birth and death, separation of the etheric body only occurs in exceptional cases and only for a short time. For example, if a person strains one of his limbs, a part of the etheric body can separate from the physical body. A limb in which this is the case is said to have "fallen asleep". And the peculiar feeling that one then experiences stems from the separation of the etheric body. (Of course, a materialistic way of thinking can again deny the invisible in the visible and say that all this only comes from the physical disturbance caused by the pressure). In such a case, supersensible observation can see how the corresponding part of the etheric body moves out of the physical body. If a person experiences a very unusual fright or something similar, the etheric body can be separated for a very short time for a large part of the body. This is the case when a person suddenly feels close to death as a result of something, for example when he is drowning or is in danger of falling down a mountain. What people who have experienced such things say is indeed close to the truth and can be confirmed by psychic observation. They say that in such moments their whole life has appeared before their souls as if in a large memory picture. Of the many examples that could be cited here, only one may be referred to, because it comes from a man for whose way of thinking everything that is said here about such things must appear to be vain fantasy. For it is always very useful for those who take a few steps into supersensible observation to acquaint themselves with the statements of those who regard this science as fantasy. Such information cannot so easily be accused of bias on the part of the observer. (The secret scientists may only learn a great deal from those who regard their endeavors as nonsense. They need not be misled if the latter do not show them any sympathy in this respect. Supersensible observation itself, however, does not need such things to prove its results. Nor does it seek to prove, but to explain, with these indications). In his memoirs, Moritz Benedict, an excellent criminal anthropologist and important researcher in many other fields of natural research, recounts a case he himself experienced: once, when he was close to drowning in a bath, he saw his whole life before him in his memory as if in a single image. - If others describe the images experienced on a similar occasion differently, even in such a way that they seem to have little to do with the events of their past, this does not contradict what has been said, for the images that arise in the quite unfamiliar state of separation from the physical body are sometimes not readily explicable in their relationship to life. However, a correct observation will always recognize this relationship. Nor is it an objection if, for example, someone was once close to drowning and did not have the experience described. It must be remembered that this can only occur when the etheric body is really separated from the physical body and the former remains connected to the astral body. If the shock also causes a loosening of the etheric body and astral body, then the experience does not occur, because then there is complete unconsciousness, as in dreamless sleep.

[ 11 ] In the first time after death, the experienced past appears summarized in a memory painting. After the separation from the etheric body, the astral body is now on its own on its further journey. It is not difficult to see that everything remains in the astral body that it has acquired through its own activity during its stay in the physical body. The ego has to a certain extent worked out the spirit self, the life spirit and the spirit man. As far as these are developed, they do not receive their existence from what is present as organs in the bodies, but from the ego. And this ego is precisely the being that does not need any external organs for its perception. Nor does it need such organs in order to remain in possession of what it has united with itself. One could object: why is there no perception of this developed spirit self, life spirit and spirit man in sleep? It is not there because the ego is chained to the physical body between birth and death. Even if it is outside this physical body in sleep with the astral body, it still remains closely connected to it. For the activity of its astral body is turned towards this physical body. This means that the ego's perception is limited to the outer world of the senses and it cannot receive the revelations of the spiritual in its immediate form. Only through death does this revelation come to the ego, because it is freed from its connection with the physical and etheric body. At that moment another world can light up for the soul, in which it is drawn out of the physical world, which in life binds its activity to itself. - Now there are reasons why not all connection with the outer sense world ceases for the human being at this time either. Certain desires remain which maintain this connection. These are desires which man creates for himself precisely because he is aware of his ego as the fourth member of his being. Those cravings and desires which spring from the being of the three lower bodies can also only work within the outer world; and when these bodies are discarded, they cease. Hunger is caused by the outer body; it is silent as soon as this outer body is no longer connected with the ego. If the ego had no other desires than those which originate from its own spiritual being, it could, at the onset of death, draw full satisfaction from the spiritual world into which it has been transferred. But life has given it other desires. It has kindled in it a desire for pleasures that can only be satisfied by physical organs, even though they do not come from the nature of these organs themselves. Not only do the three bodies demand their satisfaction through the physical world, but the ego itself finds pleasures within this world for which there is no object for satisfaction at all in the spiritual world. There are two kinds of desires for the ego in life. Those that stem from the bodies, which must therefore be satisfied within the bodies, but which also come to an end with the disintegration of the bodies. Then there are those that stem from the spiritual nature of the ego. As long as the I is in the bodies, these too will be satisfied by the bodily organs. For the hidden spiritual is at work in the manifestations of the organs of the body. And in everything that the senses perceive, they simultaneously receive a spiritual. This spiritual is also present after death, albeit in a different form. Everything that the ego desires from the spiritual within the sense world, it also has when the senses are no longer there. If these two kinds of desires were not joined by a third, death would only mean a transition from desires that can be satisfied by the senses to those that find their fulfillment in the revelation of the spiritual world. This third kind of desires are those which the ego generates during its life in the sense world, because it finds pleasure in it even in so far as the spiritual is not revealed in it. - The lowest pleasures can be revelations of the spirit. The satisfaction which the intake of food affords the hungry being is a revelation of the spirit. For through the intake of food that is brought about without which the spiritual could not find its development in a certain respect. The ego, however, can go beyond the genus that is necessarily required by this fact. It can crave tasty food, quite apart from the service rendered to the spirit by the intake of food. The same is true of other things in the world of the senses. Desires are thereby generated which would never have appeared in the sense world if the human ego had not been incorporated into it. But such desires do not arise from the spiritual nature of the ego either. The ego must have sensual pleasures as long as it lives in the body, even insofar as it is spiritual. For the spirit reveals itself in the sensual; and the ego enjoys nothing other than the spirit when it surrenders itself in the world of the senses to that through which the light of the spirit shines. And it will remain in the enjoyment of this light, even if sensuality is no longer the means through which the rays of the spirit pass. For such desires, however, there is no fulfillment in the spiritual world for which the spirit does not already live in the sensual. When death occurs, the possibility of enjoyment is cut off for these desires. The enjoyment of tasty food can only be brought about by the presence of the physical organs that are used in the intake of the food: Palate, tongue, etc. The human being no longer has these after discarding the physical body. But if the ego still has a need for such genus, then this need must remain unsatisfied. If this genus corresponds to the spirit, it is only present as long as the physical organs are there. But if the ego has produced it without serving the spirit, it remains after death as a desire that thirsts in vain for satisfaction. We can only form an idea of what is going on in the human being if we imagine someone suffering a burning thirst in an area where there is no water to be found for miles around. This is what happens to the ego when, after death, it harbors unquenched desires for the pleasures of the outer world and has no organs to satisfy them. Of course, the burning thirst, which serves as a comparison with the state of the ego after death, must be thought of as being increased to the extreme and imagined as being extended to all the desires still present at that time, for which there is no possibility of fulfillment. The next state of the ego consists in freeing itself from this bond of attraction to the outer world. The ego must bring about a purification and liberation within itself in this respect. Everything must be eradicated from it that has been generated by it within the body and that has no right of residence in the spiritual world. - Just as an object is seized by fire and burnt, so the world of desires described above is dissolved and destroyed after death. This opens up a view into that world which supersensible knowledge can describe as the "consuming fire of the spirit". This "fire" captures a desire that is sensual in nature, but it is such that the sensual is not an expression of the spirit. One might find such ideas, as supersensible knowledge must give in relation to these processes, bleak and terrible. It might seem frightening that a hope, for the satisfaction of which sensual organs are necessary, must after death turn into hopelessness, that a wish which only the physical world can fulfill must then turn into burning deprivation. One can only hold such an opinion as long as one does not consider that all desires and cravings that are seized by the "consuming fire" after death do not represent benevolent but destructive forces in life in the higher sense. Through such forces, the ego forges a stronger bond with the world of the senses than is necessary in order to absorb from this same world of the senses everything that it desires. This world of the senses is a revelation of the spiritual hidden behind it. The ego could never enjoy the spirit in the form in which it can only reveal itself through bodily senses if it did not want to use these senses for the enjoyment of the spiritual in the sensual. But the ego also withdraws as much of the true spiritual reality in the world as it desires from the world of the senses without the spirit speaking. If sensual pleasure as an expression of the spirit means elevation, development of the ego, then that which is not such an expression means impoverishment, desolation of it. If such a desire is satisfied in the world of the senses, its destructive effect on the ego remains. But this destructive effect is not visible to the ego before death. That is why the indulgence of such desires can generate new desires of the same kind in life. And the person does not even realize that he is wrapping himself in a "consuming fire". After death, only that which already surrounds him in life becomes visible; and by becoming visible, this also appears in its salutary, beneficial consequence. Whoever loves a person is not only drawn to what can be felt through the physical organs. But it can only be said of this that it is withdrawn from perception at death. But this is precisely what becomes visible in the loved one, for whose perception the physical organs were only the means. Indeed, the only thing that prevents this full visibility is the presence of the desire that can only be satisfied by physical organs. But if this desire were not eradicated, the conscious perception of the loved one after death could not occur at all. Seen in this way, the idea of the dreadful and comfortless that events after death could have for man, as they must be described by supersensible knowledge, is transformed into that of the deeply satisfying and comforting.

[ 12 ] The next experiences after death are quite different from those during life in yet another respect. During purification, the human being lives backwards, so to speak. He goes through everything again that he has experienced in life since birth. From the processes that immediately preceded death, he begins and experiences everything again backwards to childhood. And in doing so, everything that did not arise from the spiritual nature of the ego during life comes spiritually before his eyes. Only now he also experiences all this in reverse. For example, a person who has died in his sixtieth year and who has inflicted physical or spiritual pain on someone in his fortieth year out of a surge of anger will experience this event again when he has reached the point of his fortieth year in his return journey through existence after death. The only difference is that he will not experience the satisfaction that he received in life from the attack on the other person, but rather the pain that he inflicted on this other person. From the above, however, it can also be seen at the same time that only that part of such a process can be perceived as painful after death which has arisen from a desire of the ego that originates only in the external physical world. In truth, the ego not only harms the other through the satisfaction of such a desire, but also itself; only this harm remains invisible to it during life. After death, however, this whole world of harmful desires becomes visible to the ego. And the ego then feels drawn to every being and every thing in which such a desire has been kindled, so that it can be extinguished again in the "consuming fire" just as it has arisen. Only when the human being has arrived at the time of his birth during his backward journey have all such desires passed through the purifying fire, and from now on nothing prevents him from fully surrendering to the spiritual world. He enters a new stage of existence. Just as in death he shed the physical body, and soon afterwards the etheric body, so now that part of the astral body which can only live in the consciousness of the outer physical world disintegrates. For supersensible cognition there are thus three corpses, the physical, the etheric and the astral. The time at which the latter is cast off from man is characterized by the fact that the time of purification is about a third of that which elapsed between birth and death. Later, when the course of human life is examined on the basis of the secret science, the reason why this is so will become clear. For supersensible observation, astral corpses are continually present in the human environment, which are cast off by people who pass from the state of purification into a higher existence. This is exactly the same as physical corpses arise for physical perception where people live.

[ 13 ] After purification, the ego enters a completely new state of consciousness. Whereas before death external perceptions had to flow to it so that the light of consciousness could fall on them, now a world flows from within, as it were, which reaches consciousness. The ego also lives in this world between birth and death. Only then does the latter clothe itself in the revelations of the senses; and only where the ego perceives itself in its "innermost sanctum", disregarding all sensory perception, does that which otherwise only appears in the veil of the sensory announce itself in immediate form. Just as the perception of the ego takes place inwardly before death, the spiritual world reveals itself in its fullness from within after death and after purification. Actually, this revelation is already there immediately after the etheric body has been laid aside; but the world of desires, which are still turned towards the outer world, lies before it like a darkening cloud. It is as if the black demonic shadows, which arise from the desires consuming themselves in the "fire", were mixed into a blissful world of spiritual experience. Indeed, these desires are now not mere shadows, but real entities; this becomes immediately apparent when the physical organs are removed from the ego and it can thus perceive what is of a spiritual nature. These beings appear as distorted images and caricatures of what was previously known to man through sensory perception. Supersensible observation has to say of this world of purifying fire that it is inhabited by beings whose appearance can be gruesome and painful to the spiritual eye, whose desire seems to be destruction and whose passion is directed towards an evil against which the evil of the sense world seems insignificant. What man brings into this world in the way of marked desires appears to these entities like nourishment, through which their powers constantly receive new strength and reinforcement. The picture thus formed of a world imperceptible to the senses can appear less incredible to man if he looks at a part of the animal world with an unbiased eye. What is a cruelly prowling wolf to the spiritual gaze? What is revealed by what the senses perceive in it? Nothing other than a soul that lives in desires and acts through them. You can call the wolf's outer form an embodiment of these desires. And if man had no organs to perceive this form, he would still have to recognize the existence of the corresponding being if its desires were invisible in their effects, if a force invisible to the eye were lurking around, through which everything that happens through the visible wolf could happen. Now, the beings of the purifying fire are not present for the sensual, but only for the supersensible consciousness; but their effects are obvious: they consist in the destruction of the ego when this gives them nourishment. These effects become clearly visible when the well-founded pleasure increases to intemperance and debauchery. For what is perceptible to the senses would also only stimulate the ego to the extent that the genus is founded in its essence. The animal is driven to desire only by that in the external world which its three bodies crave. Man has higher pleasures because the fourth, the ego, is added to the three bodily members. If, however, the ego desires such a satisfaction, which does not serve to preserve and further its nature, but to destroy it, then such a desire can be neither the effect of its three bodies nor of its own nature, but only that of entities which remain hidden from the senses according to their true form, but which can approach the higher nature of the ego and stimulate it to desires which are not connected with sensuality, but which can only be satisfied through it. There are beings who have passions and desires as their nourishment which are of a worse kind than all animal ones, because they do not live out their lives in the sensual, but seize the spiritual and drag it down into the sensual field. The forms of such beings are therefore uglier and more horrible to the spiritual eye than the forms of the wildest animals, in which only passions are embodied that are rooted in the sensual; and the destructive powers of these beings far surpass all the destructive rage that exists in the sensually perceptible animal world. In this way, supersensible knowledge must broaden man's view as to a world of beings that is in a certain respect lower than the visible destructive animal world.

[ 14 ] When man has passed through this world after death, then he finds himself facing a world which contains spiritual things and which also only produces a desire in him which finds its satisfaction in the spiritual. But even now man distinguishes between that which belongs to his ego and that which forms the environment of this ego - one can also say its spiritual outer world. Only that which he experiences from this environment flows to him in the same way as the perception of his own ego flows to him during his stay in the body. Thus, while man's environment speaks to him through the organs of his bodies in the life between birth and death, the language of the new environment penetrates directly into the "innermost sanctuary" of the ego after all bodies have been laid aside. The entire environment of the human being is now filled with entities that are of the same kind as his ego, for only an ego has access to an ego. Just as minerals, plants and animals surround man in the world of the senses and compose it, so after death he is surrounded by a world composed of entities of a spiritual nature. But man brings something into this world which is not his environment; it is that which the ego has experienced within the sense world. At first the sum of these experiences appeared immediately after death, as long as the etheric body was still connected with the ego, as a comprehensive memory picture. The etheric body itself is then discarded, but something of the memory painting remains as an imperishable possession of the ego. As if one were to make an extract, an excerpt, from all the experiences that have come to the human being between birth and death, so that which remains behind stands out. This is the spiritual endurance of life, the fruit of it. This experience is of a spiritual nature. It contains everything that reveals itself spiritually through the senses. But without life in the sense world it could not have come about. After death, the ego perceives this spiritual fruit of the sense world as that which is now its own, its inner world and with which it enters the world that consists of beings that reveal themselves, as only its ego can reveal itself in its deepest inner being. Just as a plant seed, which is an extract of the whole plant, only unfolds when it is immersed in another world, in the earth, so now that which the ego brings with it from the sense world unfolds like a seed which is acted upon by the spiritual environment which has now received it. The science of the supersensible can, however, only give pictures if it is to describe what is going on in this "spirit-land"; but these pictures can be such as present themselves to the supersensible consciousness as true reality when it follows the corresponding events invisible to the sensuous eye. What is to be described there can be made vivid by comparison with the world of the senses. For although it is entirely spiritual, it has a certain resemblance to the sensory world. Just as, for example, a color appears in the sensory world when this or that object acts on the eye, so an experience like that of a color appears before the ego in the "spirit world" when a being acts on it. Only this experience is brought about in the same way that only the perception of the ego within can be brought about in the life between birth and death. It is not as if the light fell into the human being from outside, but as if another being had a direct effect on the ego and caused it to imagine this effect in a color picture. Thus all beings in the spiritual environment of the ego find their expression in a color-radiating world. Since they have a different kind of origin, these color experiences of the spiritual world are naturally also of a somewhat different character than those of the sensual colors. Similar things must also be said for other impressions which man receives from the sense world. However, the sounds of the spiritual world are most similar to the impressions of the sense world. And the more the human being settles into this world, the more it becomes for him a life moving in itself, which can be compared with the sounds and their harmony in sensory reality. Now he does not feel the sounds as something that comes to an organ from outside, but as a power that flows out into the world through his ego. He feels the sound as he feels his own speaking or singing in the sense world; only in the spiritual world he knows that these sounds that flow out of him are at the same time the manifestations of other entities that pour out into the world through him. An even higher manifestation in the "spirit land" takes place when the sound becomes the "spiritual word". Then not only does the moving life of another spiritual being flow through the ego, but such a being itself communicates its inner being to this ego. And without the separating factor that every togetherness in the sense world must have, two beings live in each other when the "spiritual word" flows through the ego. And this is really the kind of togetherness of the ego with other spiritual beings after death. Before the supersensible consciousness three areas of the spirit world appear, which can be compared with three parts of the physical sense world. The first area is, so to speak, the "solid land" of the spiritual world, the second the "sea and river area" and the third the "circle of air". - What takes on physical form on earth, so that it can be perceived by physical organs, is perceived according to its spiritual essence in the first area of the "spirit land". A crystal, for example, can perceive the force that forms its shape. But what is revealed there behaves like a contrast to what appears in the sense world. The space which in the latter world is filled by the mass of stone appears to the spiritual eye like a kind of cavity; but all around this cavity is seen the force which forms the shape of the stone. A color that the stone has in the sense world appears in the spiritual world as the experience of the opposite color; thus a red-colored stone is seen from the spirit world as greenish, a green one as reddish, and so on. The other qualities also appear in their opposites. Just as stones, earth masses and the like form the solid land - the continental area - of the sensory world, so do the objects depicted compose the "solid land" of the spiritual world. - Everything that is life within the world of the senses is ocean territory in the spiritual. To the sensual eye, life appears in its effects in plants, animals and humans. To the spiritual eye, life is a flowing being that permeates the spirit land like seas and rivers. Better still is the comparison with the circulation of blood in the body. For while the seas and rivers in the world of the senses are irregularly distributed, there is a certain regularity in the distribution of the flowing life in the spirit land, as in the circulation of blood. At the same time, this "flowing life" is perceived as a spiritual sound. - The third area of the spirit land is its "circle of air". What occurs in the sense world as sensation is present in the spirit realm as pervasively as air is present on earth. Imagine a sea of flowing sensation. Sorrow and pain, joy and delight flow in this realm like wind and storm in the air of the sensual world. Think of a battle being fought on earth. There are not only human figures facing each other that the sensual eye can see, but feelings stand against feelings, passions against passions; pain fills the battlefield just as much as human figures. Everything that lives there in passion, in pain, in the joy of victory, is not only present insofar as it manifests itself in sensually perceptible effects; it comes to the consciousness of the spiritual sense as a process of the circle of air in the spirit land. Such an event in the spiritual is like a thunderstorm in the physical world. And the perception of these events can be compared to the hearing of words in the physical world. This is why it is said that just as the air envelops and permeates earthly beings, so the "wafting spiritual words" envelop and permeate the beings and processes of the spirit land.

[ 15 ] And further perceptions are still possible in this spiritual world. That which can be compared to the warmth and light of the physical world is also present here. That which, like warmth, permeates all earthly things and beings in the spirit world is the world of thought itself. Only the thoughts there are to be imagined as living, independent beings. What man grasps as thoughts in the revealed world is like a shadow of what lives as thought beings in the spirit world. Imagine the thought as it exists in man, lifted out of this man and endowed with its own inner life as an active, acting being, and you have a faint visualization of what fills the fourth region of the spirit land. What man perceives as thoughts in his physical world between birth and death is only the revelation of the world of thoughts as it can be formed through the tools of the body. But everything that man harbors in such thoughts that signify an enrichment in the physical world has its origin in this realm. With such thoughts one need not only think of the ideas of the great inventors, the geniuses, but one can see in every human being how he has "ideas" which he does not merely owe to the external world, but through which he transforms this external world himself. As far as feelings and passions come into consideration, to which the cause lies in the outer world, these feelings etc. are to be placed in the third region of the spirit world; but everything that can live in the human soul in such a way that man becomes a creator, that he has a transforming and fertilizing effect on his environment: this is revealed in its very own, essential form in the fourth field of the spiritual world. - What is present in the fifth region can be compared to physical light. It is wisdom revealing itself in its very own form. Beings who pour wisdom into their surroundings, like the sun pours light onto physical beings, belong to this region. What is illuminated by this wisdom shows itself in its true meaning and significance for the spiritual world, just as a physical being shows its color when illuminated by light. - There are still higher regions of the spirit world; they will be described later in this book. After death the ego is immersed in this world with the experience it brings with it from sensual life. And this experience is still united with that part of the astral body which is not cast off at the end of the purification period. Only that part falls away which, with its desires and wishes, was turned towards physical life after death. The sinking of the ego with what it has acquired from the sensual world into the spiritual world can be compared to the embedding of a seed in the ripening earth. Just as this seed draws the substances and forces from its surroundings in order to develop into a new plant, so development and growth is the essence of the ego embedded in the spiritual world. - What an organ perceives also contains the power by which this organ itself is formed. The eye perceives light. But without light there would be no eye. Beings who spend their lives in darkness do not in themselves develop any tools for seeing. Thus, however, the whole physical human being is created out of the hidden powers of what is perceived through the limbs of the bodies. The physical body is built up by the forces of the physical world, the etheric body by those of the living world, and the astral body is formed out of the astral world. When the ego is transported into the spirit world, it is confronted by precisely those forces that remain hidden to physical perception. What becomes visible in the first region of the spirit land are the spiritual entities that always surround the human being and which have also built up his physical body. In the physical world, therefore, man perceives nothing other than the revelations of those spiritual forces which have also formed his own physical body. After death he is in the midst of these formative forces themselves, which now show themselves to him in their own, previously hidden form. Likewise, through the second region he is in the midst of the forces of which his etheric body is composed; in the third region the powers flow towards him from which his astral body is structured. The higher regions of the spirit land now also let flow to him that from which he is built up in life between birth and death.

[ 16 ] These entities of the spiritual world now work together with that which the human being has brought with him as fruit from the previous life and which now becomes a seed. And through this interaction the human being is initially built up anew as a spiritual being. In sleep the physical body and the etheric body remain in existence; the astral body and the ego are indeed outside these two, but still connected with them. The influences they receive from the spiritual world in such a state can only serve to restore the powers that were exhausted during waking. But after the physical body and the etheric body have been discarded, and after the period of purification also those parts of the astral body which are still connected with the physical world through their desires, everything that flows into the ego from the spiritual world now becomes not only an improver but a reshaper. And after a certain time, which will be discussed in later parts of this writing, an astral body has formed around the ego, which can again dwell in an etheric body and a physical body such as are characteristic of the human being between birth and death. The human being can again go through a birth and appear in a renewed earthly existence, which has now incorporated into itself the fruit of the former life. Until the new formation of an astral body, man is witness to his reconstruction. Since the powers of the spirit world do not reveal themselves to him through external organs, but from within, like his own self in self-consciousness, he can perceive this revelation as long as his mind is not yet directed towards an external world of perception. From the moment the astral body is newly formed, however, this sense turns outwards. The astral body now demands an outer etheric body and physical body again. It thus turns away from the revelations of the inner. This is why there is now an intermediate state in which the human being sinks into unconsciousness. Consciousness can only reappear in the physical world when the organs necessary for physical perception have been formed. During this time, when the consciousness enlightened by inner perception ceases, the new etheric body begins to attach itself to the astral body, and the human being can then also move back into a physical body. Only such an ego could participate with consciousness in these two attachments, which has of its own accord generated the creative forces hidden in the etheric body and physical body, the life spirit and the spirit man. As long as the human being is not ready, entities that are further along in their development than he himself must guide this incorporation. The astral body is guided by such beings to a pair of parents so that it can be endowed with the corresponding etheric body and physical body. - Before the incorporation of the etheric body takes place, something extraordinarily significant happens for the human being re-entering physical existence. In his previous life he has created disturbing powers which have manifested themselves during the return journey after death. Take the example mentioned earlier. In the fortieth year of his previous life, out of a surge of anger, man inflicted pain on someone. After death, this pain of the other person confronted him as a disturbing force for the development of his own ego. And so it is with all such incidents of the previous life. On re-entering physical life, these obstacles to development again stand before the ego. Just as with the entrance of death a kind of memory painting stood before the human ego, so now a preview of the life to come. Again the human being sees such a painting, which now shows all the obstacles that the human being has to clear away if his development is to continue. And what he sees in this way becomes the starting point of forces that man must take with him into the new life. The image of the pain that he has inflicted on the other becomes the force that drives the ego, when it re-enters life, to make up for this pain. Thus the previous life has a determining effect on the new one. The deeds of this new life are caused in a certain way by those of the previous one. This lawful connection between a previous existence and a later one is regarded as the law of fate; it has become customary to refer to it with the term "karma", borrowed from Oriental wisdom.

[ 17 ] Building up a new bodily connection is not, however, the only activity incumbent on man between death and a new birth. While this construction is taking place, the human being lives outside the physical world. During this time, however, the physical world continues to develop. The earth changes its face in relatively short periods of time. What did it look like a few millennia ago in the areas currently occupied by Germany? When man appears on earth in a new existence, it generally never looks the same as it did at the time of his last life. While he was absent from the earth, everything possible has changed. Hidden forces are now also at work in this change in the face of the earth. They work from the same world in which the human being finds himself after death. And he himself must participate in this transformation of the earth. He can only do so under the guidance of higher beings as long as he has not acquired a clear awareness of the connection between the spiritual and its expression in the physical through the creation of the spirit of life and spiritual man. But he is involved in the transformation of earthly conditions. It can be said that during the time from death to a new birth, people reshape the earth so that its conditions match what has developed within themselves. If we look at a patch of earth at a certain point in time and then again after a long time in a completely changed state, the forces that have brought about this change are in the dead human beings. They are also in contact with the earth in this way between death and a new birth. The supersensible consciousness sees in all physical existence the revelation of a hidden spiritual. For physical observation, the light of the sun, the changes in the climate, etc. have an effect on the transformation of the earth. For supersensible observation, the ray of light that falls from the sun on the plant is the power of dead people. This observation becomes aware of how human souls hover around the plants, how they walk the earth and the like. Man is not merely turned towards himself, not only towards the preparation for his own new earthly existence after death. No, he is called to create spiritually in the outer world, just as he is called to create physically in the life between birth and death.

[ 18 ] However, it is not only the life of man from the spirit world that affects the conditions of the physical world, but conversely, the activity in the physical existence also has its effects in the spiritual world. An example can illustrate what happens in this relationship. There is a bond of love between mother and child. This love emanates from the attraction between the two, which is rooted in the forces of the sensory world. But it changes over the course of time. The sensual bond becomes more and more spiritual. And this spiritual bond is woven not only for the physical world, but also for the spirit world. It is the same with other relationships. What is woven in the physical world by spiritual beings remains in the spiritual world. Friends who have bonded closely together in life also belong together in the spirit world; and after they have shed their bodies they are in a much closer union than in physical life. For as spirits they are there for each other in the same way as described above in the revelations of spiritual beings to others through the inner being. And a bond that has been woven between two people also brings them together again in a new life. In the truest sense of the word, we must therefore speak of people finding each other again after death.

[ 19 ] What has once taken place with man, from birth to death and from there to a new birth, repeats itself. Man always returns to earth when the fruit he has acquired in a physical life has reached maturity in the spirit world. But there is not a repetition without beginning and end, but man has once passed from other forms of existence into those which proceed in the manner indicated, and he will pass to others in the future. The outlook on these transitional stages will emerge when the development of the universe in connection with man is described below in the sense of supersensible consciousness.

[ 20 ] The processes between death and a new birth are of course even more hidden to external sensory observation than that which underlies the revealed existence between birth and death as spiritual. This sensory observation can only see the effects of this part of the hidden world where they enter physical existence. The question for it must be whether the person who enters into existence through birth brings with him something of what the supersensible knowledge of processes between a previous death and birth describes. If someone finds a snail shell in which nothing of an animal is noticeable, he will only recognize that this snail shell has come into being through the activity of an animal and cannot believe that it has come together in its form through mere physical forces. Likewise, someone who observes man in life and finds something that cannot originate from this life can reasonably admit that it comes from what the science of the supersensible describes, if this sheds an explanatory light on what is otherwise inexplicable. In this way, sensory observation could also find the invisible causes comprehensible from the visible effects. And whoever observes this life with complete impartiality will find that with each new observation it becomes more and more correct. It is only a matter of finding the right point of view to observe the effects in life. Where, for example, are the effects of what supersensible knowledge describes as the processes of the time of purification? How does the effect of what man is supposed to experience after this period of purification in the purely spiritual realm, according to the indications of spiritual research, come to light?

[ 21 ] Enigmas are enough for any serious, profound consideration of life in this field. One person is born in need and misery, endowed with few talents, so that he seems predestined to a miserable existence by the facts of his birth. The other is nurtured and cared for from the first moment of his existence by caring hands and hearts; brilliant abilities develop in him; he is predisposed to a fruitful, satisfying existence. Two opposing attitudes can assert themselves in the face of such questions. The one will want to cling to what the senses can perceive and what the mind, clinging to these senses, can comprehend. This attitude will not see any question in the fact that one person is born into happiness and the other into misfortune. Even if it does not want to use the word "coincidence", it will not think of assuming any lawful connection that causes this. And with regard to dispositions and talents, such a way of thinking will stick to what is "inherited" from parents, foreparents and other ancestors. It will refuse to look for the causes in spiritual processes which the person himself has gone through before his birth - apart from the hereditary line of his ancestors - and through which he has formed his dispositions and talents. - Another mindset will feel unsatisfied by such a view. It will say that nothing happens in a certain place or in a certain environment, even in the revealed world, without having to presuppose causes as to why this is the case. Even if in many cases man has not yet investigated these causes, they do exist. An alpine flower does not grow in the lowlands. There is something in its nature that links it to the Alpine region. In the same way, there must be something in a person that causes him to be born into a certain environment. Causes that merely lie in the physical world are not enough. To the deeper thinker, they appear as if the fact that someone has struck another person a blow should not be explained by the feelings of the former, but by the physical mechanism of his hand. - This attitude must be equally unsatisfied with all explanations based on the mere "heredity" of dispositions and talents. One may at least say of it: see how certain dispositions are passed on in families. In two and a half centuries, musical talents have been passed down through the members of the Bach family. The Bernoulli family produced eight mathematicians, some of whom were destined for completely different professions in their childhood. But their "inherited" talents always drove them towards the family profession. One might also point out how one can show, through precise research into the ancestral line of a personality, that in one way or another the talent of this personality was shown by the ancestors and that it is only a summation of inherited talents. - He who has the second kind of mind indicated will certainly not disregard such facts; but they cannot be to him what they are to him who wants to base his explanations only on the processes in the world of the senses. The former will point out that the inherited dispositions can no more add up to the personality as a whole by themselves than the metal parts of the watch form themselves into the personality. And if it is objected to him that it is after all the interaction of the parents that can bring about the combination of the dispositions, i.e. that this takes the place of the watchmaker, so to speak, he will reply: Look with impartiality at the completely new thing that is given with every child's personality; this cannot come from the parents, simply because it is not present in them. c4That the personal gifts of man, if they were subject to the law of mere "heredity", would have to show themselves not at the end but at the beginning of a blood community, could of course easily be misunderstood as a statement. One could say, yes, they cannot manifest themselves there, because they must first develop. But this is no objection; for if one wants to prove that something is inherited from a previous one, one must show how that which was already there before can be found in the descendant. If it were now shown that something was there at the beginning of a consanguinity which would be found again in the further course, one could speak of inheritance. But it is not possible if something appears at the end that was not there before. The reversal of the sentence above should only show that the idea of inheritance is an impossible one.

[ 22 ] Unclear thinking can cause a lot of confusion in this area. The worst thing is when those of the former mindset portray those of the latter as opponents of what is based on "certain facts". But it need not even occur to the latter to deny the truth or value of these facts. For example, they can certainly see that a certain mental disposition, or even a certain school of thought, is "passed on" in a family and that certain dispositions, when summed up and combined in a descendant, result in a significant personality. They are quite capable of admitting when they are told that the most important name is rarely at the top, but at the bottom of a bloodline. But it should not be held against them if they are forced to form quite different ideas from those who only want to stick to the sensual and factual. The latter can be replied to: Certainly a human being shows the characteristics of his ancestors, for the spiritual-soul, which enters physical existence through birth, takes its corporeality from what heredity gives it. This, however, says nothing more than that a being bears the characteristics of the medium in which it is immersed. It is certainly a strange - trivial - comparison, but the unbiased person will not deny its justification if it is said that the fact that a human being shows itself wrapped in the characteristics of its ancestors proves nothing for the origin of the personal characteristics of this being, just as it proves nothing for the inner nature of a person if he is wet because he has fallen into water. And it can also be said that if the most significant name is at the end of a blood union, this shows that the bearer of this name needed this blood union in order to form the body that he needed for the development of his overall personality. But it proves nothing for the "inheritance" of the personal itself: indeed, for sound logic this fact proves the very opposite. For if the personal gifts were inherited, they would have to stand at the beginning of a consanguinity and then be passed on from there to the descendants. But since they are at the end, this is precisely a testimony to the fact that they are not inherited.

[ 23 ] Now it should not be denied that those who speak of spiritual causation in life contribute no less to confusion. They are often spoken of in far too general, vague terms. It can certainly be compared with the assertion that the metal parts of a watch have assembled themselves to form it, when it is said that a person's personality is made up of inherited characteristics. But it must also be admitted that with many assertions in relation to a spiritual world it is no different than if someone said: the metal parts of the clock cannot assemble themselves in such a way that the hands are pushed forward by the assembly, so there must be something spiritual that takes care of this pushing forward. Compared to such an assertion, however, the person who says: "Oh, I don't care any more about such "mystical" beings that push the hands forward; I am trying to get to know the mechanical connections that cause the hands to move forward. It is not just a matter of knowing that there is a spiritual being (the watchmaker) behind something mechanical, for example the watch, but it can only be meaningful to get to know the thoughts that preceded the production of the watch in the mind of the watchmaker. These thoughts can be found in the mechanism.

[ 24 ] All mere dreaming and fantasizing about the supernatural only leads to confusion. For it is unsuitable to satisfy the opponents. They are right when they say that such references to supernatural beings in general do nothing to promote an understanding of the facts. Certainly, such opponents may also say the same about the specific statements of spiritual science. But then it can be pointed out how the effects of hidden spiritual causes show themselves in manifest life. It can be said that it is true, as spiritual science claims to have established through observation, that a person has undergone a period of purification after death and that during this period he has experienced in his soul the obstacle to his progressive development that was a certain deed he performed in a previous life. While he was experiencing this, the urge to improve the consequences of this act formed in him. He brings this drive with him into a new life. And the presence of this drive forms the trait in his being that places him in a position from which improvement is possible. Consider a totality of such drives, and one has a cause for the fated environment into which a person is born. - The same can be done with another assumption. Let it again be assumed that what is said by spiritual science is correct, that the fruits of a past life are incorporated into the spiritual germ of man, and that the spirit-land in which he finds himself between death and a new life is the region in which these fruits ripen in order to appear in a new life, transformed into dispositions and faculties, and to form the personality in such a way that it appears as the effect of what has been gained in a previous life. - Whoever makes these assumptions and looks at life with them impartially will see that through them everything that is sensual and factual can be recognized in its full meaning and truth, but that at the same time everything becomes comprehensible that must always remain incomprehensible to those whose attitude is directed towards the spiritual world if they rely solely on sensual facts. And above all, every illogicality of the kind indicated earlier will disappear: because the most important name is at the end of a bloodline, the bearer must have inherited his gift. Life becomes logically comprehensible through the supersensible facts ascertained by spiritual science.

[ 25 ] The conscientious seeker of truth, who wants to find his way around the facts without his own experience in the supersensible world, will also be able to raise a weighty objection. It can be argued that it is inadmissible to assume the existence of any facts simply because they can explain something that is otherwise inexplicable. Such an objection is certainly completely meaningless for those who know the relevant facts from supersensible experience. And in the following parts of this writing the path is indicated which can be followed in order to become acquainted not only with other spiritual facts described here, but also with the law of spiritual causation as a personal experience. But for anyone who does not want to take this path, the above objection can have a meaning. And what can be said against it is also valuable for someone who is determined to follow the indicated path himself. For if someone takes it in the right way, then it is itself the best first step that can be taken on this path. - For it is quite true that merely because one can explain by it something which otherwise remains inexplicable, one should not assume something of whose existence one otherwise has no knowledge. But in the case of the spiritual facts mentioned, the matter is still different. If one accepts them, this not only has the intellectual consequence that one finds life comprehensible through them, but one also experiences something quite different through the inclusion of these premises in one's thoughts. Consider the following case: something happens to someone that causes quite embarrassing feelings in him. He can now relate to it in two ways. He can experience the incident as something that embarrasses him and surrender to the embarrassing feeling, perhaps even sink into pain. But he can also face it differently. He can say: In truth, in a past life I myself formed the force within me that put me in front of this incident; I actually inflicted the thing on myself. And he can now arouse all the feelings in himself that such a thought can cause. Naturally, the thought must be experienced with the utmost seriousness and with all possible strength if it is to have such an effect on the emotional and sentimental life. Whoever achieves this will have an experience that can best be illustrated by a comparison. Let us assume that two people are given a sealing wax stick. One of them makes intellectual observations about the "inner nature" of the rod. These reflections may be very clever; if this "inner nature" is not revealed by anything, someone may say to him: that is dreaming. The other, however, rubs the sealing wax with a cloth and then shows that the rod attracts small bodies. There is an important difference between the thoughts that passed through the first man's head and inspired him to make these observations, and those of the second. The thoughts of the first have no actual result; but those of the second have a power, that is, something actual, drawn out of their concealment. - So it is with the thoughts of a man who imagines that he has planted the power to come together with an event in himself through a previous life. This mere imagination stimulates a real power in him, through which he can encounter the event in a completely different way than if he did not harbor this imagination. It sheds light on the necessary nature of this event, which he could otherwise only recognize as a coincidence. And he will immediately realize: I have had the right thought, because this thought had the power to reveal the fact to me. If someone repeats such inner processes, they will continue to become a means of inner power supply, and thus prove their correctness through their fruitfulness. And this rightness shows itself, little by little, strongly enough. In spiritual, mental and also physical terms, such processes have a healthy, indeed in every respect beneficial effect on life. The human being becomes aware that he is thereby placing himself in a correct way in the context of life, whereas if he only pays attention to the one life between birth and death, he is indulging in delusion. The human being becomes stronger in soul through the marked knowledge. - However, everyone can only obtain such purely inner proof of spiritual causation for himself in his inner life. But everyone can have it. However, anyone who has not obtained it cannot judge its probative value. But anyone who has obtained it can hardly doubt it. And there is no need to be surprised that this is the case. For what is so completely connected with that which constitutes man's innermost being, his personality, it is only natural that it can only be sufficiently proven in the innermost experience. - It cannot, however, be argued that such a matter, because it corresponds to such an inner experience, must be settled by each person for himself, and that it cannot be a matter for spiritual science. It is certain that everyone must have the experience himself, just as everyone must realize the proof of a mathematical theorem. But the way in which the experience can be achieved is valid for all people, just as the method of proving a mathematical theorem is valid for all.

[ 26 ] It is not to be denied that - apart from supersensible observations, of course - the proof just given by the power of the corresponding thoughts is the only one that stands up to any unbiased logic. All other considerations are certainly very significant; but they will all have something that an opponent can find points of attack on. However, anyone who has acquired a sufficiently impartial view will find something in the possibility and actuality of man's upbringing that has the logical power to prove that a spiritual being struggles to exist in the bodily shell. He will compare the animal with the human being and say to himself: in the former, the characteristics and abilities that are decisive for it appear at birth as something determined in itself, which clearly shows how it is predetermined by heredity and unfolds in the outside world. We can see how the young chick carries out life's activities in a certain way from birth. Through education, however, the human being enters into a relationship with his inner life that can stand without any relation to heredity. And he can be in a position to appropriate the effects of such external influences. Those who educate know that such influences must be met by forces from within the human being; if this is not the case, then all training and education is meaningless. For the unbiased educator, the boundary between the inherited dispositions and those inner forces of the human being which shine through these dispositions and which stem from earlier life courses is very clear. Certainly, it is not possible to cite such "weighty" evidence for such things as one can for certain physical facts through the scales. But these things are the intimacies of life. And for those who have a sense for them, even such intangible evidence is proof; even more proof than tangible reality. The fact that animals can also be trained, i.e. that they take on characteristics and abilities through education, is no objection for those who are able to look at the essentials. For apart from the fact that transitions can be found everywhere in the world, the results of training do not merge with an animal's personal nature in the same way as they do with humans. It is even emphasized how the abilities that are imparted to domestic animals in living together with humans are inherited, i.e. have an immediate generic, not a personal effect. Darwin describes how dogs retrieve without having been trained or seen to do so. Who would say the same about human education?

[ 27 ] Now there are thinkers who, through their observations, go beyond the opinion that man is put together by purely inherited forces from outside. They rise to the idea that a spiritual being, an individuality, precedes the bodily existence and shapes it. But many of them do not find the possibility to understand that there are repeated earth lives and that in the intermediate existence between the lives the fruits of the previous lives are co-forming forces. One such thinker may be cited from the series. Immanuel Hermann Fichte, the son of the great Fichte, cites his observations in his "Anthropology", which lead him (page 528) to the following summarizing judgment: 3Brockhaus, Leipzig 1860 "The parents are not the producers in a complete sense: they provide the organic material, and not merely this, but at the same time that intermediate, sensual-comfortable, which shows itself in temperament, in peculiar coloring of the mind, in definite specification of the instincts, and the like, as the common source of which the 'imagination' has arisen in that wider sense which we have proved. In all these elements of the personality the mixture and peculiar connection of the parental souls is unmistakable; to declare them therefore to be a mere product of procreation is perfectly justified, still more so if, as we had to decide, procreation is conceived as a real process of the soul. But the actual, concluding center of the personality is missing here; for on deeper observation it becomes apparent that even those comfortable peculiarities are only a shell and a tool to contain the actual spiritual ideal dispositions of man, suitable to promote or hinder them in their development, but by no means capable of letting them arise from themselves." And it goes on to say: "Everyone pre-exists according to his basic spiritual form; for spiritually speaking, no two individuals are alike, any more than one animal species is like another" (page 532). These thoughts only go so far as to allow a spiritual entity to enter into the physical corporeality of the human being. But since its formative powers are not derived from the causes of previous lives, every time a personality arises, such a spiritual entity would have to emerge from a divine origin. Under this assumption, however, there would be no possibility of explaining the relationship that exists between the dispositions that emerge from the human inner being and that which penetrates this inner being from the external earthly environment in the course of life. The human inner being, which for each individual human being originated from a divine source, would have to be completely alien to what it encounters in earthly life. Only then - as is indeed the case - will this not be the case if this human inner being was already connected with the outer world, if it is not living in it for the first time. The unbiased educator can clearly perceive that I am bringing something to my pupil from the results of his life on earth which is alien to his merely inherited qualities, but which nevertheless appears to him as if he had already been present during the work from which these results originate. Only the repeated earth lives in connection with the facts presented by spiritual research in the spiritual realm between the earth lives: only all this can give a satisfactory explanation of the all-round life of present humanity. - It is expressly said here: the "present" humanity. For spiritual research shows that the cycle of earthly lives did indeed once begin and that different conditions existed then than at present for the spiritual being of man entering the bodily shell. In the following chapters we will go back to this primeval state of the human being. When the results of spiritual science will have shown how this human being received its present form in connection with the development of the earth, it will also be possible to indicate more precisely how the spiritual essence of man penetrates from supersensible worlds into the bodily shells, and how the spiritual law of causation, the "human destiny", is formed.