The Fall of the Spirits of Darkness
GA 177
29 September 1917, Dornach
1. The Driving Forces Behind Europe's War
It is a matter of deep satisfaction to me, as I think you know, to be with you again for a while, for this is the place where we are able to create a visible sign of our intentions and of the will to come closer and closer to a true knowledge of the spirit in our studies and in our work in spiritual science.
The quest for knowledge is intimately bound up with the most inward aspect of the human being, and every now and then we must therefore enquire into the essential nature of our will and intent. In the light of the present situation, woeful as it is, it seems the answer to this question must be a negative one. For more than three years we have seen something spread across the world that I need not discuss in detail, at least to begin with, for we are all aware of it and feel it deeply. The events now taking place are the opposite of our own intentions, which have come to expression in this very building.1The ‘visible sign’ was the First Goetheanum, built from 1913 onwards and destroyed by fire on New Year's Eve 1922/23. See H. Biesantz, A. Klingborg, et al., The Goetheanum: Rudolf Steiner's Architectural Impulse. Rudolf Steiner Press, London 1979.
Again and again we must try to see clearly which stream of spiritual development we wish to see taken up by humanity, and today we have to say it is the opposite of the stream which has led to the terrible tragedy of these last years. This is something we may call to mind again and again when we give deep and full consideration to the events now raging all over the world. We may say to ourselves that it appears as if time were drawn out and had become elastic, as if the things we remember from before this madness took hold of the world happened not just years but centuries ago.
There will, of course, be many today—as there always have been—who may be said to sleep through the events of the day, people who are not fully awake to what is going on today. But when those who are awake look back on what went through their minds four or five years ago and left an impression, they will feel more or the less the way one does when one lets the mind dwell on an old book or a work of art that was created hundreds of years ago. Events which meant something to us before this madness came on the world now seem to have happened an infinitely long time ago.
Anyone who was awake—through the science of the spirit—was, of course, able to appreciate what was coming even before these events developed. Many of our friends will remember the almost routine answer I gave to questions asked over and over again after my public lectures from the beginning of this century. The question, you may remember, was: “According to the statistics, the world population is increasing; how does this relate to the idea of repeated earth lives? The increase in population is rapid. How can one reconcile this with the spiritual scientific finding that these are always the same souls?” My answer always had to be: It does look as if the statisticians are right and the world population is increasing; but we have to take a longer view and consider much longer time-spans if we are to do justice to the question. And I would always go on to say that a time may well come, sooner than we may expect, when people discover to their horror that the population can also decrease.
I t is not always possible to give plain and simple answers in anthroposophy. People have not yet reached the point where they are able to take truths in the right way and some things can only be hinted at. Read through the lectures given in Vienna not long before this catastrophe came on our world and you will find the passage where I spoke of the social cancer that is gnawing away at the evolution of humanity.2Rudolf Steiner, The Inner Nature of Man and Life Between Death and a New Birth. Trans. by A. Meuss. Rudolf Steiner Press, Bristol 1993 (GA 153). The passage referred to is in the lecture given on 14 April 1914. This and other things were said in order to indicate what was going to happen in human evolution and to challenge people to reflect. For we need to reflect on these things if we are really and truly to wake up. We need to be awake and alive for the sake of humanity. If anthroposophy is to fulfil its purpose, its prime task must be to rouse people and make them really wake up. Merely knowing what is going on in the physical world, and knowing the laws that human minds are able to perceive as operative in this world, is no more than being asleep in a higher sense. Humanity is only fully awake when people are able to develop notions and ideas of the world of the spirit. This is all around us, just as air and water, the stars, the sun and the moon are all around us. When we are physically asleep we are wholly given up to the internal processes that go on in the body during the night and have no idea of anything in the physical world around us. We are asleep in exactly the same way when we are wholly given up to the physical environment, and to the world and the laws of the intellect, and have no idea of the world of the spirit that is all around us.
Humanity has made great play of its intellectual progress and scientific achievements in the last few centuries and has been particularly insistent on this at the turn of the nineteenth to the twentieth century. Yet, strangely enough, the unconscious and instinctive life was never more to the fore than it is at this time. Up to the present time this instinctive and unconscious element has increasingly taken hold of the human race. Failure to see the spiritual reality and take account of the element of the spirit is ultimately the cause of this terrible world war. Nor can it be said that through these years—years which have turned into centuries for anyone who is awake in them, as I have said—humanity has learned an adequate lesson from the terrible events around us. Sadly, it has to be said that the opposite is the case.
What is the characteristic element to be found day by day, hour by hour, when we take note of what people think, or rather pretend to think and pretend to want? It is that, fundamentally speaking, no one in the world knows what they want, and no one realizes that people's perfectly justifiable aims, whichever form they may take in the minds of individual nations, would be achieved so much better if they did away with these terrible wars in which so much blood is shed. People do not realize that these terrible events with their bloodshed are really not necessary as a means of helping them to achieve their aims.
These events have a mysterious background, but if you consider some of the things said in our anthroposophical lectures over the years, even if they have only been touched on lightly, you will find perfectly clear statements, also with reference to the most significant of recent events. Consider also what has been said in these very rooms, especially in the last few years, on the character of the Russian people and the difference between the Russians and the peoples of Western and Central Europe.3Lectures given by Rudolf Steiner on 7, 14 and 15 October 1916, also on 24 September 1916, published in Inner Impulses of Human Evolution (GA 171), trans. revised by G. Church, F. Kozlik and S.C. Easton, Antroposophic Press, Hudson, NY, 1984. You will find that you need the things which have been said here to gain understanding of an event that appears to have come in with such vehemence. It has burst forth as though it were a karmic vengeance, the inner meaning of which is quite clear, though the word ‘vengeance’ must be taken as a technical term and not at all in a moral sense.
Not only the Russian people, but those of Europe and the whole world, will have to reflect for a long time to come on the events in Eastern Europe, events much more mysterious than we are inclined to think. Something has come to the surface which has been preparing for centuries. The new element wanting to take shape is something completely different from what is actually taking shape. Later generations will be able to use the events which will be taking shape in Eastern Europe over the next decades to demonstrate the difference between maya and reality. For you see, the generations of today are taking what is happening now for the real thing, when this is in fact still waiting in the wings, and they are wrong in taking it for real, for something quite different wants to make its appearance.
The people in the West are ill-equipped to understand what wants to come to the surface. Why are they so ill-equipped? Strange as it may seem to people today—not to you but to the ordinary, average individual; being anthroposophists, you are not ordinary, average people of today—the present age is more than any other age demanding the one thing people least want to have: understanding based on the science of the spirit. Strange as it may sound to the ordinary, average people of today—order will not be created from the chaos of the present time until a sufficiently large number of people are prepared to recognize the truths of that science. Such will be the karma of world history.
If people insist that this war is just like the wars of the past and that we'll be making peace just as peace has been made before—let them talk. They are the people who love maya and do not distinguish between truth and deception. Let them make what may seem like ‘peace’—order will only arise from the chaos that fills the world today when insight based on the science of the spirit dawns in human minds. You may feel in your hearts that it will be a long time before such order comes; you may think it will be a long time before people are prepared to let the dawn of such a science arise, and you will be right. You have to accept that it will be a long time before order arises from the chaos. For it will not come until human hearts understand the realm of the spirit. Order can only come when it is understood how this chaos has arisen.
Chaos has arisen because the reality is considered in an unspiritual way and the world of the spirit cannot be ignored with impunity. You may think it is enough to live with thoughts and ideas that are wholly derived from the physical world. It is what people generally think today, though this does not make it true. The most completely and utterly wrong idea humanity has ever had is—to put it simply—that the spirits will put up with being ignored. You may consider it egotistical and selfish on their part, but the terminology is different in their world. Egotism or not, the spirits take their revenge if they are ignored here on earth. This is a law, an iron necessity. One way to characterize the present time is to say that the present human chaos is the revenge of the spirits who have been ignored for too long.
I have often said, both here and elsewhere: A mysterious connection exists between human consciousness and the destructive powers of decline and fall in the universe. Each can, or indeed must, take the place of the other in the following way.
Let us assume there was a time, say during the last twenty or thirty years of the nineteenth century, when people put the same effort into their quest for the things of the spirit as they have put into achieving material knowledge and material actions during those twenty or thirty years. What would have happened if they had endeavoured to recognize the world of the spirit and used this to give a character, a foundation, to the physical world, rather than follow mere instinct and chase after more and more knowledge of a kind that has seen its ultimate triumph in the creation of instruments of murder and found its be-all and end-all in people enriching themselves with nothing but material goods? What would have happened if people had sought to gain spiritual knowledge and spiritual impulses for their activities in the social sphere? It would have meant that the powers of destruction were paid off! If people had been more awake and not asleep in the last decades of the nineteenth century there would have been greater awareness and therefore no need for destruction in the first decades of the twentieth century. Spiritual awareness simply has to be greater than purely sensual and material awareness. If this had been the case during the last decades of the nineteenth century, the powers of destruction would not have had to intervene in the early decades of the twentieth century.
This is brought to realization most insistently, and perhaps most cruelly, to the perceptive mind when you meet many of the dead who have entered the world of the spirit either during the last decades of the nineteenth or the first decades of the twentieth century. Many of them have been caught up in the hustle and bustle and search for material values here on earth and never had the opportunity to let spiritual impulses arouse awareness. Many have gone through the gate of death without even a notion of the thoughts and ideas that point to spiritual impulses. If they had had the opportunity to take in spiritual thoughts and ideas before they went through the gate of death they could have taken these with them. It would have been something they needed after death, but they were not in a position to have it.
Anyone who knows the history of ideas of the last decades of the nineteenth and the first decades of the twentieth century also knows that people actually no longer knew how to use the term ‘spirit’. It has been used to describe all kinds of things, but not the true spirit. Those souls therefore had no opportunity of knowing the spirit whilst here on earth and they have to take the consequences. Having gone through the gate of death and entered the world of the spirit, they are thirsting for—well, what are they thirsting for, these souls who lived in materialism here? They are thirsting for destructive powers in the physical world! Those are the dues and they must be paid.
There is no easy way of dealing with these things. If we want to know the realities in this sphere, we must acquire a feeling for what the ancient Egyptians called ‘iron necessity’. Terrible as it may be, it was necessary that destruction should spread, for those who had gone through the gate of death were longing for the destructive powers in which they are able to live, seeing they did not receive what was due to them and had been deprived of spiritual impulses while on earth.
Order cannot arise from the chaos until people are ready to give room to such grave truths in their souls and also let these truths enter into the ideas that apply in the world of politics today. And if these truths sound pessimistic to you and make you think that humanity is still a long way from achieving all that is demanded, as I have indicated, you are indeed right. But let this justifiable pessimism become a challenge to be awake and to try, whatever your place in life may be, to awaken souls so that the science of the spirit can send out its impulses. It cannot yet be done to any great extent, but we must have the real, honest desire to make people consciously aware in such a way that they are able to understand this concrete fact: Longings have arisen in the dead in recent times, and those longings are being met with events which are truly horrifying for those of us who are alive here on the physical plane.
Just think how easy it is for some people to present their friends with an image of the region into which human beings enter when they have gone through the gate of death. Consider the unctuous sermons preached in the churches—with politicians now actually following the example of these sermonizers—and the facile notions people have of the world of the spirit, and you simply cannot help realizing how far removed from reality is the facile vanity of many of today's leading figures. Compare the speeches of such leading figures—their lives show that they do anything but lead and that they are guided by all kinds of forces of which they are completely unconscious and which are not the right forces—compare this with what is really needed at the present time, and you will realize the immense gravity of the present situation.
Right next to our physical world lies another, non-physical or spiritual world, and this has never before influenced our world as intensely as it is doing at the present time. People are not aware of this, however; they do not even notice when things get heart-stoppingly fearsome and terrible. Intensely illuminating words are heard in the world today; they should set vast numbers of people thinking. But people never notice, or at least they do not show it if they do.
Some of you will remember that on a number of occasions in the last three years4For example, in The Karma of Materialism. Trans. by R. Everett. Anthroposophie Press, Hudson, NY, and Rudolf Steiner Press, London 1985. I have said that when the history of this ‘world war’ will be written in the future—unfortunately present-day critics have not done so, though it could be done fairly easily—it will be impossible to use the method which has produced the legend, the fairy-tale, or call it what you will, which currently goes by the name of ‘history’. This was produced by ‘scholars’—as the world calls them—sitting in libraries for months, years and decades and studying diplomatic records in order to write their histories. Inevitably a time will come when most of these histories will have to be pulped. In fact, no one will be able to write the history of these last years by such a method unless they are literally off their heads.
The causes of the chaos will not be apparent to the people who have been writing histories until now, but only to people who have a real feeling for what it means when a miserable individual of our time has to face a court and is forced to sum up the condition he was in at the time by flinging down before the world the lamentable statement: ‘First one thing happened, then another, and that was the moment when I went out of my mind!’ It was Suchomlinov who spoke these pitiful words.5Vladimir Alexandrovitch Suchomlinov, 1848–1926, Minister for War at the time when the First World War broke out. Together with Janushkievitch, Chief of General Staff, and Sasonov, Foreign Minister, Suchomlinov played a key role in the fateful mobilization of the Russian army on 29 July 1914, ignoring a direct order from the Tsar to countermand the mobilization at the last minute. After the deposition of the Tsar, Suchomlinov was questioned in court. According to the paper Novoie Vremia, the words he said in court were: ‘On that day I almost went out of my mind.’ Quoted from Suchomlinov, die russische Mobilmachung im Lichte amtlicher Urkunden und der Entlillungen des Prozesses, Berne 1917.
Many people had gone out of their minds at that time, not only Suchomlinov. What kind of moments are these in world events when the only way of describing them is by confessing that one has gone out of one's mind? They are moments when Ahriman and his cohorts gain access to the human race and to human thoughts. For as long as people watch over their conscious minds and their consciousness is not in any way clouded or inactive, neither Ahriman nor Lucifer have access to it. But when it is not fully active and one needs to use the phrase ‘I have gone out of my mind’, that is the moment when Ahriman and his cohorts enter the stage. The things that happen then will not appear in diplomatic records—little of what it says in those records in recent decades makes real sense, by the way. Leaving this aside, the things that have happened in our time and have led to chaos are not merely human actions, but above all the actions of ahrimanic spirits seeking to gain access by reducing human awareness. Some of you know very well that soon after the present catastrophe broke on the world I pointed out that when we speak of the origins of this catastrophe in time to come, we must not do so on the basis of written records; instead we shall have to point to real facts through which ahrimanic spirits gained access to the stage of human events.
These things must be taken in all seriousness; they have to be seen as concrete realities and not merely as abstract formulations. People who do not know anything about it may well laugh when one says that Ahriman gained access to human evolution. They may well laugh at people who say this, but the day will come when world history laughs them to scorn for having laughed at others today.
We certainly cannot say that the judgments, ideas and notions to be found on the surface in recent years show any degree of maturity. People even failed to understand when eighteen months ago it was pointed out somewhere that something might soon happen of which due note should be taken; it should not be taken lightly. Concrete examples given as an indication of what was likely to happen were never taken in the right way; people were not sufficiently awake in their minds to do so. Now the event has come. And people fail to realize that something is taking root deeply in a certain soil. People are taking it as something which—well, because a certain number of statements take up so many lines, people accept they have a number of statements made in that particular number of lines. They are not at all interested in looking for the roots of such statements, but simply take things at their face value.
I think you know what I mean. You know I am referring to the Papal Note1On 1 August 1917 Pope Benedict XV issued a Peace Note to the governments of the belligerent nations. as something I had seen coming for eighteen months. I have looked around a great deal to see if I might not find someone who has expressed their views on this Note, or asked the kind of question that should have come to mind.
Let us remember that the idea of the state as we know it today has been dawning since the sixteenth century. In some parts of the world peculiar people known as ‘historians’ are speaking of states as something which have existed for I do not know how long. But they know little about real history. The present-day idea of a state is no more than four or five hundred years old and something entirely different existed in earlier times. It is important to know this and be really clear about it. The priestly element, which is to be found in Rome, is indeed older than our modern states. It had its justification in its own day, when it brought about many things in the world. I have tried to find out if people are asking themselves the question: What does it really mean that the modern structures which have developed over four or five centuries cannot find a way of achieving order out of their own resources, and look back to the old priestly element as something to be discussed in the way people generally discuss things today?
It would interest me to know if anyone faced with the question as to whether it is a good idea to skate on ice when it is only one millimetre thick would actually answer in the affirmative. Relative to what we are really dealing with, the concepts on which people base their opinions when a priestly element brings impulses into modern life today are like a one- millimetre layer of ice covering the water. The things people write and say today are like someone skating on ice that is not more than one millimetre in thickness. No one is trying to understand what is happening, no one is prepared to see that what matters is not to take a document and look at the statements it contains, but to know that a statement can mean something totally different, depending on the source from which it comes.
Everywhere today we are faced with the need to warn people in all seriousness to look to the origins, to see how things are related, to look for realities and not to the way things look on the surface. Surely it cannot be that difficult for anyone to admit: I see the way things are, but I do not yet understand them and therefore I will not say anything to interfere. Considering the incredibly superficial level of education, it is not at all surprising when people are able to understand and have an opinion on everything. People find it really difficult to admit that they cannot judge an issue and need to get a basis for their judgement before they give an opinion. In fact, it hardly ever comes to their minds that one has to have a basis on which to form an opinion.
Infinitely much depends on real insight into the driving forces, especially for the immediate future. It has to be realized that the chaos will certainly not be reduced if—speaking hypothetically—the churches were to succeed in establishing even the initial stages of apparent order. The worst error we can fall into would be to say: It does not matter where peace comes from, even if it is from the Pope. The point is, it may actually cause no harm at all to have peace initiated by the Pope; the question is how those who are involved see the issue.
Again and again we need to be really clear in our minds that the present time is literally challenging us every hour, indeed every minute, to wake up. Anthroposophy as a science of the spirit can only be understood by those who are able to grasp that humanity is being asked to make a clear decision. Either the spirit is understood or the chaos continues. A papered-over chaos would be no better than the carnage we have today. If we are unable to come up with anything better than materialism and again materialism, even a heightened materialism, in the next few years, and if it were to happen that the events of the last three years, to which humanity has failed to wake up and take notice, were to lead to a new rush for material goods—many people are longing for this as something that comes with peace—then souls would once again go through the gate of death and thirst for destruction here on earth. There would be no end to the destruction.
All it needs is to get an idea, a feeling, an inner impulse for the need to turn to the things of the spirit! Then we shall progress, depending on the extent to which this is achieved. Anyone who wants to gain a little understanding of the present position, and looks at our time in the light of the serious truths we have been considering, must develop a reasonable degree of feeling for all the terrible, hopelessly commonplace and superficial things that are now being written and said in this world.
Imagine a band of children smashing up all the pots and plates, glasses and everything in the house. The adults who see this happening are considering how to stop it, for the children keep running to the larder and all over the house to find more things to smash. Finally the adults have an idea as to how they can stop it. A number of people who are watching, people who actually consider themselves to be the teachers of these children, find a solution: They take care that everything breakable is collected and smashed to pieces—and that, they think, should put an end to it all! I do not know how many people would not consider those teachers to be fools. This is the kind of situation where people would see the truth. Yet there are people who consider themselves to be wise and who say to the whole world: Carnage must continue until peace comes; everything has to be broken, so there will be nothing left to smash in the world. This is considered wisdom. Go on murdering people for as long as you can and you will stop the murder. This is wisdom!
For anyone who has even a spark of logic it is no longer wisdom when the teacher says to a band of children: To make sure nothing else gets smashed up, I will quickly get people to collect all other breakable objects and smash them; I reckon nothing else will get smashed after that. Why do people call this foolishness and the other thing political foresight? Because people's thinking stops at the very point where it should be most intense, which is where their thoughts relate to great questions of destiny.
We shall continue with this tomorrow, and consider some serious spiritual truths.
Erster Vortrag
Meine lieben Freunde! Sie werden mir glauben, daß es mir eine tiefe Befriedigung ist, wieder einige Zeit hier unter Ihnen sein zu können, an derjenigen Stelle, wo wir ein sichtbares Zeichen unseres Wollens, unseres Strebens aufrichten dürfen, desjenigen Strebens, dem wir uns im Studium und in der Ausübung der Geisteswissenschaft immer mehr und mehr nähern wollen.
Wir werden uns ja, da dieses geisteswissenschaftliche Streben mit dem Innersten, Innerlichsten des Menschen zusammenhängt, von Zeit zu Zeit immer wieder die Frage stellen, welches denn eigentlich der Grundcharakter unseres Wollens ist. Und man möchte sagen, in der Gegenwart ergibt sich aus den Zeitverhältnissen heraus, aus diesen traurigen Zeitverhältnissen heraus, eine deutliche negative Antwort auf die Frage nach dem Grundcharakter unseres Wollens, unseres Strebens. Wir sehen jetzt seit schon mehr als drei Jahren über die Welt hin sich verbreiten etwas, was ja zunächst nicht genauer charakterisiert zu werden braucht. Denn wir fühlen, wir empfinden es alle und wir dürfen sagen: Was jetzt durch die Welt geht, ist der Ausdruck, ist die Folge des Entgegengesetzten von demjenigen, dem unser Wollen und sein äußerliches Zeichen, dieser Bau, gewidmet ist. - Wenn man versucht, sich immer wieder klarzumachen, bei welcher geistigen Entwickelungsströmung wir sehen möchten, daß sie von der Menschheit aufgenommen werde, so müssen wir sagen: Es ist die entgegengesetzte von derjenigen, welche zu den furchtbaren, tragischen Ereignissen der letzten Jahre geführt hat. — Das dürfen wir uns immer wieder und wiederum klarmachen dann, wenn wir mit voller Seele Anteil nehmen an dem, was jetzt die Welt durchflutet, an dem, was jetzt die Welt durchtobt. Wir dürfen uns sagen: Diese Jahre erscheinen uns so, als ob die Zeit wie elastisch auseinandergezogen wäre, als ob dasjenige, an das wir uns erinnern als vor diesem Weltgetobe vorhanden, als ob das nicht Jahre, als ob es Jahrhunderte hinter uns läge.
Es wird ja auch in der Gegenwart viele Menschen geben, wie es zu allen Zeiten solche gegeben hat, die in einer gewissen Beziehung die Zeitereignisse verschlafen, die nicht vollständig wach sind gegenüber diesen Zeitereignissen. Allein solche, die wachen, die werden, wenn sie jetzt zurückblicken auf das, was durch ihre Seele gezogen ist, was Eindruck hervorgerufen hat in diesen Seelen vor vier, fünf Jahren, so empfinden, wie man etwa empfindet, wenn man ein altes Buch, ein altes Kunstwerk, das vor Jahrhunderten entstanden ist, auf seine Seele wirken läßt. Wie in die Entfernung gerückt, in eine weite zeitliche Entfernung gerückt, so sind die Ereignisse, die vor diesem Weltgetobe an uns herangetreten sind.
Wer freilich vor dem Entstehen dieser Ereignisse, jetzt im geisteswissenschaftlichen Sinne, wachend in die Welt hineingesehen hat, der konnte bemerken, was da eigentlich heranstürmt. Und viele unserer Freunde werden sich - ich darf darauf immer wieder aufmerksam machen -, viele unserer Freunde werden sich erinnern an eine, ich darf schon sagen stereotyp gegebene Antwort auf Fragen, die immer wieder nach öffentlichen Vorträgen da und dort aufgetaucht sind. Eine Frage ist ja immer wieder gekommen, wie Sie wissen; es ist diese, daß man gesagt hat: Wie verträgt sich mit der durch die Statistik nachgewiesenen Zunahme der Menschheitsbevölkerung die Lehre von den wiederholten Erdenleben? Die Menschheitsbevölkerung über die Erde hin nimmt so rasch zu. Wie ist damit vereinbar die durch die Geisteswissenschaft festgestellte Tatsache, daß es immer wieder dieselben Seelen sind? -— Und immer wieder mußte ich antworten: Es scheint äußerlich ja durch die Statistik ganz richtig festgestellt zu sein, daß die Bevölkerung der Erde zunimmt, allein man betrachtet nicht genügend lange Zeiträume, wie es nötig wäre, um zu einer solchen Frage wirklich Stellung zu bekommen, man betrachtet viel zu kurze Zeiträume. Und dann sagte ich immer, es könne eine Zeit vielleicht gar nicht so ferne liegen, wo die Menschen mit Grauen erfahren werden, daß es auch eine Abnahme der Bevölkerung gibt. - Seit dem Beginn des Jahrhunderts mußte diese Antwort immer wieder auf solche Fragen gegeben werden.
Es ist schon einmal so in der Geisteswissenschaft: Man kann nicht klipp und klar auf manche Fragen antworten, weil unsere Zeitgenossenschaft noch nicht so weit ist, die Wahrheiten im richtigen Stile aufzunehmen. Man muß manches andeuten. Wenn Sie nachlesen in den Vorträgen, die nicht lange vor dem Ausbruch dieser furchtbaren Weltkatastrophe in Wien gehalten worden sind, so werden Sie dort die Stelle finden von dem sozialen Karzinom, von der sozialen Krebskrankheit, welche an der Menschheitsentwickelung frißt. Angedeutet werden sollte durch solche und viele ähnliche Dinge, was der Menschheitsentwickelung bevorsteht, und aufgefordert werden sollte durch solche Dinge zum Nachdenken. Denn dieses Nachdenken, das ist es, was uns einzig und allein in wirklichem Sinne wach machen kann. Und waches Leben, wir brauchen es, und die Menschheit braucht es. Und wenn Geisteswissenschaft ihre Aufgabe erfüllen will, so ist vor allen Dingen nötig, daß sie die Anregerin wird zu vollem Wachsein. Denn wissen allein von den Dingen, die sich in der Sinnenwelt abspielen, und von den Gesetzen, die der Verstand durchschauen kann als in der Sinneswelt vorhanden, das heißt denn doch in einem höheren Sinne schlafen. Vollständig wach ist die Menschheit nur dann, wenn sie auch Begriffe, Ideen entwickeln kann von jener geistigen Welt, die ja ebenso um uns herum ist wie Luft und Wasser, wie die Sterne, wie die Sonne und der Mond. Und so wie man schläft, wenn man nur ganz hingegeben ist dem inneren Leibesprozeß in der Nacht und keine Ahnung hat von dem, was ringsherum in der äußeren körperlichen Welt vorhanden ist, so schläft man auch, wenn man nur der äußeren Sinneswelt hingegeben ist und der Verstandeswelt und den Verstandesgesetzen, die in der äußeren Sinneswelt walten, und keine Ahnung hat von dem, was um einen herum ist als geistige Welt.
Es ist merkwürdig, daß gerade in den letzten Jahrhunderten - und am ärgsten um die Wende des 19. zum 20. Jahrhundert — die Menschheit auf ihren geistigen Fortschritt, auf ihre wissenschaftlichen Errungenschaften so sehr pochte und daß im Grunde genommen niemals das unbewußte, instinktive Leben so ausgebreitet war wie in dieser Zeit, daß immer mehr und mehr gegen die Gegenwart herauf das instinktiv Unbewußte die Menschen ergriffen hat. Das NichtSehen dessen, was geistig um uns herum ist, das Nicht-Rechnen mit diesem Geistigen, das ist ja im letzten Grunde die Ursache dieses furchtbaren Weltenkampfes. Und man kann nicht sagen, daß die Menschheit durch die Jahre, die sich, wie ich angedeutet habe, wie Jahrhunderte verlängern für den, der sie wachend durchlebt, man kann nicht sagen, daß die Menschheit schon hinreichend viel gelernt hat von dem, was in so furchtbarer Weise sich abgespielt hat. Man könnte leider sogar das Gegenteil davon sagen.
Was ist denn das eigentlich Charakteristische, das einem jetzt täglich, stündlich auffallen kann, wenn man verfolgt, was heute Menschen denken - besser gesagt, vorgeben zu denken, vorgeben zu wollen -, was ist denn das eigentlich Charakteristische? Das eigentlich Charakteristische ist, daß im Grunde genommen über die Welt hin niemand weiß, was er will, daß niemand darauf kommt, daß dasjenige, was man berechtigterweise wollen könnte - gleichgültig, wie es sich in den einzelnen Köpfen der einzelnen Völker ausmalt -, viel besser erreicht würde, wenn man die furchtbaren, blutigen Ereignisse wegließe, daß diese furchtbaren, blutigen Ereignisse sich abspielen und daß sie eigentlich unnötig sind, unnötig sind zu dem, was gewollt wird.
Allerdings, es walten in diesen Ereignissen geheimnisvolle Zusammenhänge. Aber wenn Sie manches nehmen, was, allerdings auch nur andeutungsweise, im Laufe der Jahre gerade in unseren geisteswissenschaftlichen Vorträgen gesagt worden ist, so werden Sie doch finden, daß auch in bezug auf dasjenige, das sich als Allerbedeutungsvollstes hereingestellt hat in die Ereignisse der letzten Jahre, manches recht klar angedeutet worden ist. Wenn Sie nur nehmen, was auch innerhalb dieser Räume, namentlich in den letzten Jahren, entwickelt worden ist über den Charakter des russischen Volkes und über den Gegensatz dieses russischen Volkes zu den west- und mitteleuropäischen Völkern, dann werden Sie daraufkommen, daß Sie nichts anderes brauchen, als was hier gesagt worden ist, zum Verständnisse desjenigen Ereignisses, das scheinbar so stürmisch in der letzten Zeit eingeschlagen hat, zum Verständnisse dessen, was man gewöhnlich die Russische Revolution jetzt nennt, dieses Ereignisses, das hereingebrochen ist wie eine Vergeltung, aber eine innerlich durchaus absolut verständliche karmische Vergeltung, wobei man dieses Wort als Terminus technicus und gar nicht im moralischen Sinne zu nehmen hat.
Es wird nicht nur die russische, es wird die europäische, wird die Menschheit der ganzen Welt lange, lange nachzudenken haben über die Ereignisse, die sich im Osten Europas viel geheimnisvoller jetzt abspielen, als man eigentlich denkt. Denn was Jahrhunderte lang sich vorbereitet hat, das ist da an die Oberfläche getreten. Und das Neue, das sich gestalten will, es zeigt heute noch ein ganz anderes Gesicht als dasjenige, das sich entwickeln will, das sich herausgestalten will. Spätere Geschlechter werden noch die Möglichkeit haben, den Unterschied zwischen Maja und Wirklichkeit anschaulich zu machen an dem, was sich in den nächsten Jahrzehnten im Osten von Europa gestalten wird. Denn die gegenwärtigen Geschlechter nehmen die Maja eben nicht als Maja hin, sondern als eine Wirklichkeit. Sie nehmen das, was jetzt geschieht, hin als etwas, was schon dasjenige ist, was es werden will. Das ist nicht so. Da will etwas ganz anderes an die Oberfläche.
Und schlecht sind die Westvölker gerüstet zu verstehen, was da an die Oberfläche will. Warum sind sie so schlecht gerüstet? So sonderbar dies aussieht für den Menschen, nicht für Sie, aber für den Normalmenschen der Gegenwart - Sie sind ja alle dadurch, daß Sie zur Anthroposophie gehören, nicht Normalmenschen der Gegenwart —, so sonderbar das für den Normalmenschen aussieht, mehr, unendlich viel mehr als irgendeine andere Zeit erfordert diese gegenwärtige Zeit von den Menschen gerade dasjenige, was diese Menschen am allerwenigsten haben wollen: geisteswissenschaftliches Verständnis. So sonderbar es für den Normalmenschen der Gegenwart eben klingt: Ordnung wird aus dem Chaos der Gegenwart nicht, bevor eine genügend große Anzahl von Menschen sich bequemen wird, die geisteswissenschaftlichen Wahrheiten anzuerkennen. Das wird das weltgeschichtliche Karma sein.
Lassen Sie die Menschen reden, die da glauben, wir haben jetzt einen Krieg, wie frühere Kriege waren, und wir werden nächstens Frieden schließen, wie frühere Frieden geschlossen worden sind; lassen Sie das die Menschen glauben. Das sind die Menschen, die die Maja lieben, das sind die Menschen, die die Wahrheit nicht von der Täuschung unterscheiden. Lassen Sie diese Menschen selbst einen Scheinfrieden vielleicht irgendwie schließen: Ordnung wird aus diesem Chaos, das Jetzt die Welt durchzieht, nur dann, wenn die Morgenröte einer geisteswissenschaftlichen Auffassung die Menschen ergreift. Und wenn Sie etwa in Ihrem Herzen empfinden sollten: Dann wird lange nicht Ordnung werden, dann wird es noch lange dauern - weil Sie vielleicht des Glaubens sind, die Menschen werden sich lange nicht bequemen, eine geisteswissenschaftliche Morgenröte heraufkommen zu lassen -, dann werden Sie Recht haben. Dann glauben Sie aber nur auch, daß lange keine Ordnung werden wird aus diesem Chaos heraus, denn sie wird nicht früher werden, als bis eine geisteswissenschaftliche Auffassung die menschlichen Herzen durchdringt. Alles andere wird Schein sein, alles andere wird scheinbare Ruhe sein, unter der immer neue und neue Feuerflammen sich entzünden werden, denn Ordnung wird aus diesem Chaos erst entstehen, wenn man begreifen wird, woraus dieses Chaos entstanden ist.
Es ist entstanden aus ungeistiger Erfassung der Wirklichkeit Ja, aus ungeistiger Erfassung der Wirklichkeit. Die geistige Welt ignoriert man nicht ungestraft. Man kann glauben, daß man die geistige Welt ungestraft ignorieren kann, man kann glauben, daß man sich in der Welt Begriffen, Vorstellungen hingeben kann, die bloß aus der Sinneswelt entnommen sind, man kann das glauben, und das ist ja der allgemeine Glaube der heutigen Menschheit. Aber wahr ist es nicht. Nein! Der irrigste Glaube, den jemals die Menschheit hat hegen können, das ist der — wenn ich mich trivial ausdrücken darf -, daß die Geister es sich gefallen lassen, ignoriert zu werden. Fassen Sie es meinetwillen auf als einen Egoismus, als eine Selbstsucht der Geister, aber in der geistigen Welt gilt eine andere Terminologie als hier in der sinnlich-physischen Welt. Also fassen Sie es meinetwillen auf als einen Egoismus der Geister, aber die Geister rächen sich, wenn sie ignoriert werden hier. Es ist ein Gesetz, es ist eine eherne Notwendigkeit: Die Geister rächen sich. Und unter den mancherlei Charakteristiken, die man geben kann für die Gegenwart, ist auch diese richtig, daß man sagen kann: Die Rache der Geister dafür, daß man sie so lange ignoriert hat, das ist das gegenwärtige Menschheitschaos.
Erinnern Sie sich, wie oft ich hier und an andern Orten gesagt habe: Es ist ein geheimnisvoller Zusammenhang zwischen dem, was menschliches Bewußtsein ist, und den zerstörerischen Kräften des Weltenalls, gerade den Untergangskräften des Weltenalls. Ja, dieser geheimnisvolle Zusammenhang zwischen den zerstörerischen Kräften des Weltenalls und dem Bewußtsein, der besteht; er besteht so, daß das eine als Ersatz für das andere auf der einen Seite dienen kann oder auf der andern Seite dienen muß in der folgenden Art.
Nehmen wir einmal an, ein Zeitalter wäre dagewesen, sagen wir in den letzten zwanzig oder dreißig Jahren des 19. Jahrhunderts, in dem die Menschheit so nach Geistigem gestrebt hätte, wie sie in den letzten zwei bis drei Jahrzehnten des 19. Jahrhunderts nur nach materiellem Wissen und nach materiellen Taten gestrebt hat. Nehmen wir an, am Ende dieses 19. Jahrhunderts hätten die Menschen nach spirituellem Erleben, nach spirituellem Wissen, nach spirituellen Taten gestrebt. Was wäre das gewesen? Was wäre es gewesen, wenn die Menschen gesucht hätten, die geistige Welt zu erkennen und aus der geistigen Welt heraus der physischen Welt einen Charakter, eine Grundlage zu geben, statt daß in den letzten Jahrzehnten des 19. Jahrhunderts die Menschen nur instinktiv immer mehr und mehr nach demjenigen Wissen gejagt haben, welches zuletzt in der Ausgestaltung der Mordwerkzeuge seine größten Triumphe feierte und welches in der menschlichen Bereicherung mit rein materiellen Gütern aufging? Was wäre geschehen, wenn die Menschheit gestrebt hätte, spirituelles Wissen, spirituelle Impulse für das soziale Wirken zu gewinnen? Es wäre eine Abschlagszahlung gewesen für zerstörerische Kräfte! Die Menschen wären wacher gewesen, statt daß sie die letzten Jahrzehnte des 19. Jahrhunderts verschlafen haben. Die Menschen wären wacher gewesen, und die ersten Jahrzehnte des 20. Jahrhunderts hätten nicht die Zerstörung zu bringen brauchen, wenn das Bewußtsein stärker gewesen wäre. Das spirituelle Bewußtsein muß eben stärker sein als das rein sinnlichmaterielle Bewußtsein. Wäre das spirituelle Bewußtsein stärker gewesen in den letzten Jahrzehnten des 19. Jahrhunderts, so hätten nicht die zerstörerischen Kräfte einzugreifen brauchen in den ersten Jahrzehnten des 20. Jahrhunderts.
Am intensivsten, am eindringlichsten — erkenntnistheoretisch -, aber, man möchte sagen auch am grausamsten gewahrt man das, wenn man Bekanntschaft macht mit manchen Toten, die in die geistige Welt eingezogen sind, sei es in den letzten Jahrzehnten des 19. Jahrhunderts, sei es in den ersten Jahrzehnten des 20. Jahrhunderts. Viele Seelen waren darunter, die hier auf diesem Erdenrund innerhalb des Hastens und Treibens und Strebens im Materiellen keine Gelegenheit gehabt haben, ihr Bewußtsein zu erwecken mit spirituellen Impulsen. Viele sind durch die Pforte des Todes gegangen, ohne auch nur eine Ahnung zu bekommen von Begriffen, von Ideen, die spirituelle Impulse andeuten. Wäre hier auf der Erde, bevor diese Seelen durch die Pforte des Todes gegangen sind, für sie die Möglichkeit gewesen, Spirituelles in ihre Vorstellungen, in ihre Begriffe aufzunehmen, sie hätten das mit durch die Pforte des Todes getragen. Das wäre ihnen ein Gut gewesen, das sie brauchen nach dem Tode. Sie haben es nicht haben können.
Wer die Geistesgeschichte, die sogenannte Geistesgeschichte der letzten Jahrzehnte des 19. Jahrhunderts und der ersten Jahrzehnte des 20. Jahrhunderts kennt, der weiß, daß man nicht einmal mehr das Wort Geist anzuwenden gewußt hat auf das Richtige: Man hat es auf alles Mögliche angewendet, nur nicht auf dasjenige, was wirklich Geist ist. So haben die Seelen keine Möglichkeit gehabt, den Geist hier zu kennen. Sie müssen die Abschlagszahlung nehmen. Sie lechzen jetzt, da sie durch die Pforte des Todes eingetreten sind in die geistige Welt, sie lechzen - ja, wonach lechzen sie, diese Seelen, die hier im Materialismus lebten, wonach lechzen sie? Nach zerstörerischen Kräften in der physischen Welt lechzen sie! Denn das ist die Abschlagszahlung.
Diese Dinge lassen sich nicht mit bequemen Begriffen abtun. Will man auf diesem Gebiet die Realitäten kennenlernen, dann muß man sich eine Empfindung für dasjenige verschaffen, was in den ägyptischen Mysterien die eherne Notwendigkeit genannt worden ist. So furchtbar es ist, so sehr notwendig war es, daß Zerstörung Platz griff, da sich die durch die Pforte des Todes Gegangenen sehnten nach zerstörerischen Kräften, in denen sie leben können, nachdem sie hier die Abschlagszahlung durch spirituelle Impulse nicht haben erhalten können.
Es wird nicht früher Ordnung aus dem Chaos, bevor die Menschheit sich entschließt, solch ernste Wahrheiten wirklich durch ihre Seele ziehen zu lassen und auch solch ernste Wahrheiten in die Ideen einfließen zu lassen, die heute politisch durch die Welt ziehen. Und wenn diese Wahrheiten pessimistisch klingen und Sie sich denken: Wie weit ist die Menschheit noch weg von all dem, was jetzt als gefordert bedeutet worden ist -, dann haben Sie recht. Aber lassen Sie aus diesem Ihrem berechtigten Pessimismus die innere Aufforderung folgen, die wache Aufforderung, da, wo Sie können, an jeglicher Stelle des Lebens, an die Sie gestellt sind, den Versuch zu machen, Seelen zu erwecken nach der Richtung, nach der die Geisteswissenschaft ihre Impulse senden kann. Man kann es freilich heute noch nicht viel, aber man muß wirklich das ehrliche, aufrichtige Bestreben haben, in der Art, wie es eben der eine oder der andere verstehen kann, aufmerksam zu machen auf dieses Konkrete, das darin besteht, daß die neuere Zeit Sehnsuchten in den Toten hervorgerufen hat, denen jetzt entgegengekommen wird mit dem, was wir Lebenden hier auf dem physischen Plan mit Schaudern erfahren.
Wenn man bedenkt, wie bequem manche es sich machen, die für ihre Mitmenschen in der einen oder in der andern Richtung ausmalen, wie es in der Gegend aussieht, in die der Mensch eintritt, wenn er durch die Pforte des Todes gegangen ist, wenn man die salbungsvollen Kanzelreden verfolgt - und jetzt folgen den Beispielen der Kanzelmenschen sogar schon die Politiker — mit ihren bequemen Vorstellungen über die geistige Welt, dann muß man ja einen lebendigen Begriff bekommen, wie weit die bequeme Eitelei gerade führender Gegenwartsmenschen von der Wirklichkeit entfernt ist. Wenn man die Reden solcher führenden Menschen - die aber in ihrem Leben sich gerade dadurch auszeichnen, daß sie so weit wie möglich vom Führen entfernt sind und daß sie von allen möglichen ihnen unbewußten Kräften geleitet werden, nur nicht gerade von den richtigen -, wenn man diese Reden vergleicht mit dem, was der Gegenwart notwendig ist, dann sieht man, wie ernst, wie unendlich ernst die Zeit ist.
An unsere physische Welt grenzt ja unmittelbar eine andere, eine übersinnliche. Niemals war das Hereinwirken dieser an unsere physische Welt angrenzenden metaphysischen Welt so intensiv wie in dieser Zeit. Nur merken es die Menschen nicht; sie merken es noch nicht einmal, wenn es furchtbar, schauerlich wird, wenn es einem die Seele umdreht. Es gehen heute Worte durch die Welt von so intensiv aufklärendem Charakter, daß eigentlich unzählige Menschen stutzig werden müßten. Sie werden es in der Regel nicht, wenigstens lassen sie sich nichts davon anmerken, daß sie es tun.
Einige Freunde werden sich erinnern, daß ich im Laufe der letzten drei Jahre öfter auf eines aufmerksam gemacht habe, daß, wenn man einmal in der Zukunft - gegenwärtige Kritiker taten das leider nicht, obwohl man es ganz gut könnte - die Geschichte dieses sogenannten Krieges schreibt, man nicht die gleiche Methode wird einschlagen können, durch die jenes Märchen, jene Legende, wie soll man es nennen, zustandegekommen ist, die man gegenwärtig als Geschichte bezeichnet. Zustandegekommen ist dasjenige, was da ist, dadurch, daß gelehrte Herren - so nennt es die Welt - monate-, jahrelang, jahrzehntelang sich in die Bibliotheken gesetzt haben, diplomatische Dokumente studiert haben, um Geschichte zu schreiben. Es wird die Zeit kommen müssen, wo von dieser Geschichte, die auf solche Weise zustandegekommen ist, der größte Teil Makulatur sein wird. Aber man wird die Geschichte der letzten Jahre gar nicht nach derselben Methode schreiben können, wenn man nicht geradezu verrückt ist. Denn diejenigen Dinge, die zu diesem Chaos geführt haben, die werden sich nicht ergeben für jene Menschen, die bisher Geschichte geschrieben haben, sondern für solche Menschen, die eine lebhafte Empfindung dafür haben, was es heißt, wenn einmal ein bedauernswerter Mensch der Gegenwart vor das Gericht gestellt wird und vor die Welt hinschleudern muß das traurige Wort als Zusammenfassung seines Zustandes: Da geschah dies, da geschah das, und in diesem Augenblick verlor ich den Verstand! — Suchomlinow, der bedauernswerte Mensch, hat diese Worte selbst gestanden: Da verlor ich den Verstand.
Es haben mehr Leute in derselben Zeit den Verstand verloren, nicht er allein. Und was sind das für Augenblicke im Weltenlaufe, die nur angedeutet werden können dadurch, daß Menschen gestehen müssen, sie haben den Verstand verloren, was sind das für Augenblicke im Weltenlaufe? Das sind Augenblicke, wo Ahriman mit seinen Scharen den Zugang findet zum Menschengeschlechte und zum Menschengeschehen. Wenn der Mensch wacht über sein Bewußtsein, wenn dieses Bewußtsein in keiner Weise getrübt und herabgelähmt ist, dann können weder Ahriman noch Luzifer an dieses Bewußtsein heran. Wenn es aber herabgedämpft ist, wenn man nötig hat, für dieses Bewußtsein die Formel zu gebrauchen: Ich habe den Verstand verloren -, da betritt in diesem Moment Ahriman mit seinen Scharen das Weltengeschehen. Da geschehen Dinge, die nicht in diplomatische Dokumente geschrieben werden, in welche - das sei nur in Parenthese angeführt - in den letzten Jahrzehnten in der ganzen Welt wirklich recht wenig Vernünftiges hineingeschrieben worden ist. Aber abgesehen davon, was geschehen ist in unserer Zeit und was zu diesem Chaos geführt hat, das sind ja nicht Menschentaten allein, das sind vor allen Dingen Taten ahrimanischer Wesenheiten, die den Zugang versuchen durch Herabdämpfung des Bewußtseins der Menschen. Ich weiß, daß hier manche sitzen, die genau wissen, daß sie bald, nachdem die jetzige Weltkatastrophe hereingebrochen ist, von mir als Erklärung den Hinweis bekommen haben, daß, wenn man einmal darüber wird reden wollen, was diese Katastrophe herbeigeführt hat, man nicht wird reden dürfen aus Dokumenten heraus, sondern daß man wird nötig haben, diesen Weltenereignissen gegenüber auf solche Tatsachen hinzuweisen, durch die Geistig- Ahrimanisches den Zugang fand zum Menschengeschehen.
Notwendig ist es nur, daß man diese Dinge mit dem gehörigen Ernst nimmt, daß man sich nicht bloß formelhaft abstrakt, sondern wirklich konkret darauf einläßt, diese Dinge als Realitäten zu nehmen. Mögen die Menschen, die von solchen Dingen nichts wissen, heute noch so sehr darüber spotten, daß gesagt wird: Ahriman fand den Zugang zu der Menschheitsentwickelung. -— Wenn sich diese Menschen heute lustig machen über diejenigen, die so sprechen, wird aber die Weltgeschichte hohnlachen denjenigen, die sich heute darüber lustig machen!
Man kann nicht sagen, daß das, was an der Oberfläche schwimmt, Urteile, Vorstellungen und Begriffe, in den letzten Jahren eine besondere Reife zeigt, wahrhaftig nicht! Man wurde nicht einmal verstanden, wenn man da oder dort vor anderthalb Jahren darauf hindeutete, daß etwas kommen könnte, was man sehr wachend beobachten sollte, was man nicht so einfach obenhin nehmen sollte. Wenn man dann das eine oder andere Konkrete anführte, wodurch man die Menschenseelen hinweisen wollte auf das, was da kommen würde: niemals wurde genügend wache Geistigkeit entwickelt, um den Hinweis in der rechten Weise aufzunehmen. Nun ist es da. Und man sieht, es wird nicht als etwas genommen, das in einem gewissen Boden tief, tief Wurzeln schlägt, sondern wie etwas, was man —- nun ja, weil es in so und so viel Zeilen diese und jene Sätze hat - nach so und so viel Zeilen mit so und so viel Sätzen beurteilt, weil eben die Menschheit heute gar nicht darauf aus ist zu sehen, worin solche Sätze wurzeln, sondern weil man die Dinge einfach hinnimmt.
Sie verstehen wahrscheinlich, was ich meine. Sie verstehen, daß ich mit dem, was ich seit anderthalb Jahren immer deutlicher heraufkommen sah, die römische Papstnote meine. Ich habe viel Umschau gehalten, ob ich irgendwo ein Urteil fände, das sich eigentlich anschließen müßte an diese Papstnote, eine Frage, die notwendigerweise in den Menschenseelen aufdämmern müßte. Bedenken wir nur, daß seit dem 16. Jahrhundert —- wir haben ja darüber öfter gesprochen — dasjenige heraufdämmert, was man heute Staat nennt. Gewiß, jene merkwürdigen Menschen, die man heute an manchen Stellen der Welt Historiker nennt, die reden von den Staaten wie von etwas, was, ich weiß nicht wie lange, schon bestanden hat. Doch diese Historiker wissen wenig von der wirklichen Geschichte. Was heute im Staate lebt, ist nicht älter als vier- bis fünfhundert Jahre. Was vorher war, war etwas ganz anderes. Und es ist wichtig, dies zu wissen, dies sich wirklich klarzumachen. Das Sacerdotale, dasjenige, was in Rom lebt, ist wahrhaftig älter als die modernen Staaten und hatte zu seiner Zeit seine gute Berechtigung und hat manches in der Welt gewirkt. Ich habe gesucht, ob man etwa die Frage sich vorlegt: Was bedeutet es denn eigentlich für diese modernen Gebilde, die seit vier bis fünf Jahrhunderten entstanden sind, daß sie nicht die Möglichkeit finden, aus sich heraus zur Ordnung zu kommen, daß sie zu dem alten Sacerdotalen zurückblicken wie zu etwas, über das man so diskutiert, wie da und dort heute diskutiert wird?
Ich möchte wissen, ob jemand, der vor der Frage steht, ob er Schlittschuhlaufen soll, wenn das Eis nur ein Millimeter dick ist, ob sich der die Frage bejaht! Denn diejenigen Begriffe, welche die Menschen heute haben, um so etwas zu beurteilen, wenn Sacerdotales in das moderne Leben heute Impulse hereinwirft, die sind zu dem, um was es sich handelt, wie eine Eisschicht, die ein Millimeter dick ist, zu dem Wasser, das darunter ist. Und was die Menschen heute schreiben und reden, das gleicht dem Schlittschuhläufer auf einer Eisschicht, die nicht dicker als ein Millimeter ist, weil kein Mensch Verständnis sucht für die Dinge, die sich abspielen, weil kein Mensch Verständnis dafür sucht, daß es doch nicht darauf ankommt, ein Dokument in die Hand zu nehmen, um zu verfolgen, was da für Sätze stehen, sondern daß es vor allen Dingen darauf ankommt zu wissen, wie es etwas ganz anderes bedeutet, wenn der eine oder der andere Satz von da- oder von dorther kommt.
Überall liegt heute die Notwendigkeit vor zu ermahnen, ernst zu ermahnen, nach Gründlichkeit zu suchen, zu suchen danach, wie die Dinge zusammenhängen, zu suchen nach den Wirklichkeiten und nicht nach dem äußeren Schein. Was verschlägt es denn, wenn sich wirklich heute einmal ein Mensch das Geständnis macht: Nun ja, da liegen Dinge vor. Ich verstehe sie noch nicht; ich will daher noch nicht dreinreden. - Es ist ja heute gar nicht zu verwundern bei dem unglaublich oberflächlichen Stand der allgemeinen Bildung, daß die Menschen alles verstehen können, über alles ein Urteil haben können. Aber das Geständnis, daß man über so etwas nicht urteilen kann, sondern vielleicht erst sich die Grundlagen schaffen muß, um zu einem Urteil zu kommen, das wird den heutigen Menschen so schwer. Ja, es fällt ihnen kaum ein, daß es nötig ist, sich erst Grundlagen zu einem Urteil zu schaffen.
Unendlich vieles hängt gerade für die nächste Zeit ab von einem wirklichen Verständnis der treibenden Kräfte, hängt ab davon, daß man wisse: Das Chaos wird wahrhaftig nicht kleiner, wenn es lassen Sie uns die Hypothese gebrauchen - dem Sacerdotalen gelingen sollte, eine Scheinordnung auch nur anzugeben. Das Irrtümlichste, dem man sich hingeben kann, das ist, wenn heute jemand sagen würde: Ach, gleichgültig, woher der Friede kommt, wenn er auch von dem Papst kommt! — Das Bedeutungsvolle ist, daß es ja unter Umständen natürlich nicht schaden könnte, wenn ein Friede von dem Papst käme, selbstverständlich nicht; aber es handelt sich dann darum, in welchem Sinne ihn diejenigen auffassen, die mittun.
Immer wieder muß man sich klar vor die Seele stellen, wie diese unsere Zeit uns geradezu auffordert, stündlich, minütlich auffordert: Werde wach! - Allein Geisteswissenschaft, anthroposophisch orientierte Geisteswissenschaft, wird heute nur derjenige verstehen, der in der Lage ist zu begreifen, daß die Menschheit vor einem EntwederOder steht: Entweder der Geist wird begriffen oder das Chaos bleibt. Ein überkleistertes Chaos würde nicht besser sein als das heutige blutige. Wenn wir nichts anderes haben in den nächsten Jahren als wieder und wieder Materialismus und vielleicht einen erhöhten Materialismus, wenn es etwa dazu kommen sollte, daß auf der Grundlage dessen, was jetzt in den letzten drei Jahren geworden ist und wovon sich die schlafende Menschheit noch keine Rechenschaft gibt, wenn auf dieser Grundlage ein neues Wettrennen nach materiellen Gütern entstehen sollte, wie es manche herbeisehnen als ein Ergebnis des Friedens, dann würden die Seelen wiederum durch die Todespforte gehen und das Lechzen haben nach Zerstörung hier. Die Zerstörung würde nicht aufhören.
Einzig und allein einen Begriff sich verschaffen, eine Empfindung, einen inneren Impuls sich verschaffen von der Notwendigkeit der Spiritualisierung: dann wird man in dem Maße, in welchem man sich das verschafft, weiiterkommen. Wer die Zeit ein wenig verstehen will und diese Zeit an so ernsten Wahrheiten mißt, wie wir sie schon oft und heute wiederum durch unsere Seelen haben ziehen lassen, der muß doch eine einigermaßen genügende Empfindung erhalten von all dem Furchtbaren, von all dem trostlos Trivialen und Oberflächlichen, was jetzt in der Welt geschrieben und gesagt wird.
Denken Sie sich eine Schar von Kindern, sie zerbrechen ihren Eltern Töpfe, Teller, Gläser, alles. Man sieht sie an und denkt nach, wie da Einhalt gebieten, da die Kinder immer wieder nach der Küche und nach der Speisekammer und überallhin laufen, wo es noch etwas Zerbrechbares gibt. Endlich kommt man darauf, wie man dem Einhalt gebieten kann. Eine Anzahl von Menschen, die da zuschauen, die sogar die Erzieher der Kinder sein wollen, kommen darauf: Sie sorgen dafür, daß alles Zerbrechliche geholt und zerschlagen wird, bis gar nichts mehr da ist. Dann wird nichts mehr zerbrochen, dann ist es mit dem Zerbrechen zu Ende! - Ich weiß nicht, wie viele Menschen es geben wird, die nicht solche Erzieher für Toren halten würden. Da würde man das ja wohl einsehen. Wenn aber weise sich dünkende Menschen durch die Welt tönen: Man muß so lange blutige Kriege führen, bis der Friede da ist, man muß erst alles kaputtmachen, damit über die Erde hin kein Kaputtmachen mehr möglich ist —, dann sieht man das für Weisheit an. So lange morden, als es nur geht, um das Morden abzuschaffen, um das Morden zu bekämpfen, das ist Weisheit!
Für den, der noch ein Fünkchen Logik empfinden kann, ist das nicht mehr Weisheit, als wenn der Erzieher einer Kinderschar sagt: Damit nur ja nichts mehr zerbrochen wird, lasse ich schnell alles noch herbeischaffen, damit das letzte Stück auch noch zerbrochen wird, und dann wird wohl nichts mehr zerbrochen werden. — Warum nennen die Leute das letztere Torheit, das erstere Zukunftspolitik? Weil der Menschen Gedanken heute da aufhören, wo sie gerade am intensivsten werden sollten: wo sich diese Gedanken auf die großen Schicksalsfragen beziehen.
Davon wollen wir dann morgen weiter sprechen und einige ernste, spirituelle Wahrheiten miteinander behandeln.
First Lecture
My dear friends! You will believe me when I say that it is a deep satisfaction for me to be able to spend some time here with you again, in this place where we are able to erect a visible sign of our will, of our striving, of that striving which we wish to approach more and more in the study and practice of spiritual science.
Since this spiritual scientific striving is connected with the innermost, most intimate part of the human being, we will of time to time ask ourselves what the fundamental character of our will actually is. And one might say that in the present, given the circumstances of the times, given these sad circumstances, there is a clear negative answer to the question of the fundamental character of our will, of our striving. For more than three years now, we have been seeing something spreading across the world that does not need to be characterized in detail at this point. For we all feel it, we all sense it, and we can say: What is now sweeping through the world is the expression, the consequence of the opposite of that to which our will and its outward sign, this edifice, are dedicated. If we try again and again to clarify for ourselves what spiritual trend of development we would like to see taken up by humanity, we must say: It is the opposite of the one that has led to the terrible, tragic events of recent years. We must remind ourselves of this again and again when we participate with our whole soul in what is now flooding the world, in what is now raging through the world. We can say to ourselves: These years seem to us as if time has been stretched out elastically, as if what we remember as existing before this world turmoil, as if it were not years, but centuries behind us.
There will also be many people in the present, as there have been in all times, who in a certain sense are asleep to the events of the times, who are not fully awake to these events. But those who are awake, when they now look back on what has passed through their souls, what made an impression on these souls four or five years ago, will feel as one feels when one allows an old book, an old work of art created centuries ago, to affect one's soul. The events that came upon us before this world turmoil are now receding into the distance, into a distant time.
Of course, anyone who looked at the world with an alert mind in the spiritual-scientific sense before these events arose could see what was actually coming. And many of our friends will remember—I may point this out again and again—many of our friends will remember a, I might say, stereotypical answer to questions that arose again and again after public lectures here and there. One question has come up again and again, as you know; it is this: How can the doctrine of repeated lives on earth be reconciled with the increase in the human population proven by statistics? The human population on earth is growing so rapidly. How can this be reconciled with the fact established by spiritual science that it is always the same souls? And I always had to answer: Outwardly, it seems to be quite correctly established by statistics that the population of the earth is increasing, but one does not consider long enough periods of time, as would be necessary to really take a stand on such a question; one considers far too short periods of time. And then I always said that a time might not be so far off when people would learn with horror that there is also a decrease in population. Since the beginning of the century, this answer has had to be given again and again to such questions.
This is often the case in spiritual science: one cannot answer certain questions clearly and concisely because our contemporaries are not yet ready to accept the truths in the right way. One must hint at some things. If you read the lectures that were given in Vienna not long before the outbreak of this terrible world catastrophe, you will find references to the social carcinoma, the social cancer that is eating away at human development. Such things, and many similar ones, should hint at what lies ahead for human development, and should prompt us to think. For it is this thinking that alone can awaken us in the true sense of the word. And we need an awakened life, and humanity needs it. And if spiritual science wants to fulfill its task, it is necessary above all that it become the stimulus for full awakening. For to know only the things that take place in the sensory world and the laws that the intellect can perceive as existing in the sensory world is, in a higher sense, to sleep. Humanity is only fully awake when it can also develop concepts and ideas about the spiritual world, which is just as much around us as air and water, as the stars, the sun, and the moon. And just as one sleeps when one is completely absorbed in the inner bodily processes at night and has no idea of what is present in the outer physical world around us, so too do we sleep when we are devoted only to the outer sensory world and to the world of the intellect and the laws of the intellect that prevail in the outer sensory world, and have no idea of what is around us as a spiritual world.
It is remarkable that precisely in the last few centuries—and most severely at the turn of the 19th to the 20th century—humanity has insisted so much on its spiritual progress and scientific achievements, and that, in essence, the unconscious, instinctive life has never been so widespread as in this period, that more and more, the instinctive unconscious has taken hold of people against the present. Not seeing what is spiritually around us, not reckoning with this spiritual realm, is ultimately the cause of this terrible world struggle. And one cannot say that humanity has learned enough from what has happened in such a terrible way over the years, which, as I have indicated, seem like centuries to those who have lived through them with their eyes open. Unfortunately, one could even say the opposite.
What is it that strikes us every day, every hour, when we follow what people think today—or rather, what they pretend to think, what they pretend to want to think? What is it that strikes us? What strikes us is that, basically, no one in the world knows what they want, that no one realizes that what one could legitimately want—no matter how it is imagined in the individual minds of individual peoples — would be achieved much better if the terrible, bloody events were left out, that these terrible, bloody events take place and that they are actually unnecessary, unnecessary for what is wanted.
Admittedly, there are mysterious connections at work in these events. But if you take some of what has been said over the years, albeit only hinted at, in our lectures on the spiritual sciences, you will find that even with regard to what has emerged as the most significant aspect of the events of recent years, some things have been indicated quite clearly. If you take only what has been developed within these rooms, especially in recent years, about the character of the Russian people and about the contrast between the Russian people and the peoples of Western and Central Europe, then you will come to realize that you need nothing more than what has been said here to understand the event that has apparently struck so violently in recent times, to understand what what is now commonly called the Russian Revolution, this event that has broken in like a retribution, but an internally completely understandable karmic retribution, whereby this word is to be taken as a technical term and not at all in the moral sense.
Not only the Russian people, but the European people, indeed the whole of humanity, will have to reflect long and hard on the events that are now unfolding in Eastern Europe in a much more mysterious way than one might think. For what has been in preparation for centuries has now come to the surface. And the new that wants to take shape still shows a completely different face today than the one that wants to develop, that wants to emerge. Later generations will still have the opportunity to illustrate the difference between Maya and reality in what will take shape in Eastern Europe in the coming decades. For the present generations do not accept Maya as Maya, but as reality. They accept what is happening now as something that is already what it wants to become. That is not the case. Something completely different wants to come to the surface.
And the Western peoples are ill-equipped to understand what wants to come to the surface. Why are they so ill-equipped? As strange as this may seem to you, not to you, but to the average person of today—you are not average people of today because you belong to Anthroposophy—as strange as this may seem to the average person, more, infinitely more than any other time, the present time demands of people precisely what they least want: spiritual scientific understanding. As strange as it may sound to the average person of today, order will not emerge from the chaos of the present until a sufficient number of people are willing to acknowledge spiritual scientific truths. That will be the karma of world history.
Let those people talk who believe that we are now in a war like wars of the past, and that we will soon make peace as peace has been made in the past; let people believe that. These are the people who love the Maya, these are the people who cannot distinguish truth from deception. Let these people themselves perhaps somehow conclude a false peace: order will only emerge from the chaos that now pervades the world when the dawn of a spiritual scientific view takes hold of people. And if you should feel in your heart that Then there will be no order for a long time, it will take a long time—because you may believe that people will not be willing to allow a spiritual-scientific dawn to break—then you will be right. But then you must also believe that there will be no order for a long time out of this chaos, for it will not come until a spiritual-scientific view penetrates human hearts. Everything else will be an illusion, everything else will be apparent calm, beneath which ever new flames will be kindled, for order will only arise out of this chaos when people understand what has given rise to this chaos.
It has arisen from an unspiritual understanding of reality Yes, from an unspiritual understanding of reality. The spiritual world cannot be ignored with impunity. One may believe that one can ignore the spiritual world with impunity, one may believe that one can indulge in concepts and ideas that are merely taken from the sensory world, one may believe that, and that is indeed the general belief of humanity today. But it is not true. No! The most erroneous belief that humanity has ever been able to entertain is that — if I may express myself trivially — spirits allow themselves to be ignored. For my sake, consider it egoism, selfishness on the part of spirits, but in the spiritual world a different terminology applies than here in the sensory-physical world. So, for my sake, consider it as egoism on the part of the spirits, but the spirits take revenge when they are ignored here. It is a law, it is an iron necessity: the spirits take revenge. And among the many characteristics that can be attributed to the present, it is also true that one can say: The revenge of the spirits for having been ignored for so long is the present chaos of humanity.
Remember how often I have said here and elsewhere: there is a mysterious connection between what human consciousness is and the destructive forces of the universe, especially the forces of destruction in the universe. Yes, this mysterious connection between the destructive forces of the universe and consciousness does exist; it exists in such a way that one can serve as a substitute for the other on the one hand, or must serve on the other hand, in the following way.
Let us assume that there had been an age, say in the last twenty or thirty years of the 19th century, in which humanity had strived for spiritual things as it had strived for material knowledge and material deeds in the last two or three decades of the 19th century. Let us assume that at the end of the 19th century, people had strived for spiritual experience, spiritual knowledge, and spiritual deeds. What would that have been? What would it have been if people had sought to recognize the spiritual world and to give the physical world a character and foundation from the spiritual world, a foundation, instead of instinctively chasing after more and more knowledge in the last decades of the 19th century, knowledge that ultimately celebrated its greatest triumphs in the design of murder weapons and that culminated in the enrichment of humanity with purely material goods? What would have happened if humanity had strived to gain spiritual knowledge and spiritual impulses for social action? It would have been a down payment on destructive forces! People would have been more alert instead of sleeping through the last decades of the 19th century. People would have been more alert, and the first decades of the 20th century would not have had to bring destruction if consciousness had been stronger. Spiritual consciousness must be stronger than purely sensual-material consciousness. If spiritual consciousness had been stronger in the last decades of the 19th century, the destructive forces would not have had to intervene in the first decades of the 20th century.
This is most intensely, most poignantly — epistemologically speaking — but, one might say, also most cruelly perceived when one becomes acquainted with some of the dead who have entered the spiritual world, whether in the last decades of the 19th century or in the first decades of the 20th century. Among them were many souls who, here on this earth, amid the hustle and bustle and striving for material things, had no opportunity to awaken their consciousness with spiritual impulses. Many passed through the gate of death without even getting a glimpse of concepts or ideas that hint at spiritual impulses. If these souls had had the opportunity here on earth, before passing through the gate of death, to take spiritual things into their imaginations, into their concepts, they would have carried this with them through the gate of death. This would have been an asset to them, something they need after death. They were unable to have it.
Anyone familiar with the intellectual history, the so-called intellectual history of the last decades of the 19th century and the first decades of the 20th century, knows that people no longer even knew how to use the word spirit correctly: it was applied to everything except what spirit really is. Thus, souls had no opportunity to know the spirit here. They have to take the down payment. Now that they have entered the spiritual world through the gate of death, they are thirsty—yes, what are they thirsty for, these souls who lived here in materialism, what are they thirsty for? They are thirsty for destructive forces in the physical world! For that is the down payment.
These things cannot be dismissed with convenient terms. If one wants to know the realities in this field, one must acquire a feeling for what has been called the iron necessity in the Egyptian mysteries. As terrible as it is, it was necessary for destruction to take hold, because those who passed through the gate of death longed for destructive forces in which they could live after they had been unable to receive their down payment through spiritual impulses here.
There will be no order out of chaos until humanity decides to truly let such serious truths sink into its soul and also allow such serious truths to flow into the ideas that are sweeping through the world today in the form of politics. And if these truths sound pessimistic and you think to yourself: How far is humanity still from all that has now been demanded? – then you are right. But let your justified pessimism be followed by an inner call, an alert call to try, wherever you can, in every sphere of life in which you find yourself, to awaken souls in the direction in which spiritual science can send its impulses. Of course, not much can be done today, but we must have a sincere, honest desire to draw attention, in whatever way one or the other person can understand, to this concrete fact: that the modern age has awakened longings in the dead, which are now being met with what we, the living, experience here on the physical plane with horror.
When one considers how comfortable some people make themselves by painting a picture for their fellow human beings, in one direction or another, of what the area looks like into which a person enters when they pass through the gate of death, when one follows the unctuous pulpit speeches—and now even politicians are following the example of the pulpit speakers—with their comfortable ideas about the spiritual world, then one must surely gain a vivid impression of how far removed from reality is the comfortable vanity of contemporary leaders. If one compares the speeches of such leading people—who, however, are distinguished in their lives precisely by the fact that they are as far removed from leadership as possible and that they are guided by all kinds of forces of which they are unconscious, only not by the right ones—if one compares these speeches with what is necessary for the present, then one sees how serious, how infinitely serious the times are.
Our physical world is directly bordered by another, a supernatural world. Never before has the influence of this metaphysical world bordering our physical world been as intense as it is today. But people do not notice it; they do not even notice it when it becomes terrible, terrifying, when it turns your soul inside out. Words of such intensely enlightening character are circulating in the world today that countless people should actually be taken aback. As a rule, they are not, or at least they do not show that they are.
Some friends will remember that over the past three years I have often pointed out that when, in the future, the history of this so-called war is written—which, unfortunately, present-day critics have not done, although they could very well have done so—it will not be possible to use the same method that gave rise to this fairy tale, this legend, whatever you want to call it, which is currently referred to as history. What has come about is what is there, because learned gentlemen—as the world calls them—have sat in libraries for months, years, decades, studying diplomatic documents in order to write history. The time will come when most of this history, which has come about in this way, will be waste paper. But it will be impossible to write the history of recent years using the same method, unless one is completely insane. For the things that have led to this chaos will not be revealed to those who have written history up to now, but to those who have a vivid sense of what it means when a regrettable person of the present is brought before the court and must utter the sad words that sum up his condition: This happened, that happened, and at that moment I lost my mind! — Sukhomlinov, the unfortunate man, confessed these words himself: Then I lost my mind.
More people lost their minds at the same time, not just him. And what are these moments in the course of world events that can only be hinted at by people confessing that they have lost their minds? What are these moments in the course of world events? These are moments when Ahriman and his hosts find access to the human race and to human events. When human beings are awake to their consciousness, when this consciousness is in no way clouded or paralyzed, then neither Ahriman nor Lucifer can touch this consciousness. But when it is dampened, when one needs to use the formula for this consciousness: “I have lost my mind,” then at that moment Ahriman enters world events with his hosts. Things happen that cannot be written in diplomatic documents, in which — let me just mention in parentheses — very little that is reasonable has been written in recent decades throughout the world. But apart from what has happened in our time and what has led to this chaos, these are not human deeds alone, but above all the deeds of Ahrimanic beings who are trying to gain access by dulling people's consciousness. I know that there are some sitting here who know very well that soon after the present world catastrophe has broken out, they will receive an explanation from me stating that when the time comes to talk about what brought about this catastrophe, it will not be possible to refer to documents, but that it will be necessary to point to the facts that enabled the spiritual-Ahrimanic forces to gain access to human events.
It is only necessary that these things be taken with the proper seriousness, that one not merely engage with them in a formulaic, abstract way, but really concretely, taking these things as realities. People who know nothing of such things may still mock today, saying: Ahriman found access to human evolution. — But when these people today make fun of those who speak in this way, world history will laugh in derision at those who make fun of them today!
It cannot be said that what floats on the surface—judgments, ideas, and concepts—has shown any particular maturity in recent years, truly not! A year and a half ago, if you pointed out here and there that something was coming that should be watched very closely, that should not be taken lightly, you were not even understood. When you then cited one or two concrete examples to draw people's attention to what was coming, there was never enough alertness of mind to take the hint in the right way. Now it is here. And you can see that it is not being taken as something that is taking deep, deep root in a certain soil, but rather as something that — well, because it has this or that sentence in so many lines — is being judged after so many lines with so many sentences, because humanity today is not at all interested in seeing where such sentences have their roots, but simply accepts things as they are.
You probably understand what I mean. You understand that what I have been seeing emerge more and more clearly over the past year and a half is the Roman papal note. I have looked around a lot to see if I could find anywhere a judgment that would actually have to agree with this papal note, a question that would necessarily have to dawn on people's souls. Let us just consider that since the 16th century — we have spoken about this often — what we now call the state has been dawning. Certainly, those strange people who are called historians in some parts of the world today speak of states as something that has existed for I don't know how long. But these historians know little about real history. What lives in the state today is no more than four or five hundred years old. What came before was something completely different. And it is important to know this, to really understand it. The sacerdotal, that which lives in Rome, is truly older than modern states and had its justification in its time and has had an impact on the world. I have looked to see whether anyone asks the question: What does it actually mean for these modern structures, which have emerged over the last four to five centuries, that they cannot find a way to establish order from within themselves, that they look back to the old sacerdotal system as something that is discussed in the way it is discussed here and there today?
I would like to know whether someone who is faced with the question of whether to go ice skating when the ice is only a millimeter thick would answer yes! For the concepts that people have today to judge such things, when the priestly order throws impulses into modern life, are to what is at stake what a layer of ice one millimeter thick is to the water beneath it. And what people write and say today is like the skater on a layer of ice because no one seeks to understand the things that are happening, because no one seeks to understand that it is not important to pick up a document and follow the sentences written there, but that it is above all important to know how something means something completely different when one sentence comes from here and another from there.
Today, everywhere there is a need to admonish, to admonish seriously, to seek thoroughness, to seek how things are connected, to seek realities and not outward appearances. What does it matter if, for once, a person confesses today: Well, yes, there are things. I don't understand them yet; therefore, I don't want to interfere. It is hardly surprising today, given the incredibly superficial state of general education, that people think they can understand everything and have an opinion about everything. But the admission that one cannot judge such things, but must perhaps first lay the foundations for reaching a judgment, is so difficult for people today. Yes, it hardly occurs to them that it is necessary to first lay the foundations for a judgment.
An infinite amount depends, especially in the near future, on a real understanding of the driving forces, on knowing that chaos will not truly diminish if—let us use this hypothesis—the sacerdotal class succeeds in establishing even a semblance of order. The most erroneous thing one can do today is to say: Oh, it doesn't matter where peace comes from, even if it comes from the Pope! — What is significant is that, under certain circumstances, it could of course do no harm if peace came from the Pope, of course not; but the question is then in what sense those who participate in it understand it.
We must constantly remind ourselves how our times are calling out to us, every hour, every minute: Wake up! Only those who are able to understand that humanity is facing an either/or situation will understand spiritual science, anthroposophically oriented spiritual science: Either the spirit is understood, or chaos will remain. A chaos covered up with whitewash would be no better than the bloody chaos of today. If we have nothing else in the coming years but materialism again and again, and perhaps increased materialism, if it should come to pass that, on the basis of what has happened in the last three years and of which the sleeping humanity is not yet aware, if on this basis a new race for material goods should arise, as some long for as a result of peace, then souls would once again pass through the gates of death and have a thirst for destruction here. The destruction would not stop.
Simply to gain an understanding, a feeling, an inner impulse of the necessity of spiritualization: then, to the extent that one gains this, one will progress. Anyone who wants to understand the times a little and measure them by such serious truths as we have often let pass through our souls, and are letting pass again today, must surely gain a reasonably adequate sense of all the terrible, all the bleakly trivial and superficial things that are now being written and said in the world.
Imagine a crowd of children breaking their parents' pots, plates, glasses, everything. You look at them and think about how to stop them, as the children keep running back to the kitchen and the pantry and everywhere else where there is something breakable. Finally, you come up with a way to stop them. A number of people who are watching, who even want to be the children's educators, come up with an idea: they make sure that everything breakable is taken away and smashed until there is nothing left. Then nothing more will be broken, and the breaking will be over! I don't know how many people there will be who would not consider such educators to be fools. One would think so. But when people who consider themselves wise proclaim throughout the world: “We must wage bloody wars until there is peace; we must first destroy everything so that no more destruction is possible on earth” — then this is regarded as wisdom. To murder as long as possible in order to abolish murder, to fight murder, that is wisdom!
For anyone who can still feel a spark of logic, this is no more wisdom than if a teacher of a group of children says: To make sure that nothing else gets broken, I'll quickly have everything brought here so that the last piece can also be broken, and then nothing else will be broken. Why do people call the latter foolishness and the former future policy? Because people's thoughts today stop where they should be most intense: where these thoughts relate to the great questions of destiny.
We will continue this discussion tomorrow and examine some serious spiritual truths together.