Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

Man and the World of Stars
GA 219

15 December 1922, Dornach

IV. Rhythms of Earthly and Spiritual Life. Love, Memory, the Moral Life

Let us recall what I have been telling you about man's experiences between death and a new birth. The various descriptions have enabled us to realize that this life—above all in its main period, about the middle of the time between death and rebirth—is such that man lives in communion with the Beings referred to in the book Occult Science as the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies. This life of man in communion with those higher Beings is comparable with the life he has here, when in the physical body, in communion with the beings of the three kingdoms of Nature. Basically speaking, everything in his earthly environment belongs to one of the three kingdoms of Nature—to the mineral or the plant or the animal kingdom, or indeed the physical human kingdom, which in this particular connection can be taken as belonging to the animal kingdom.

Man has his senses, and through his sense-impressions he lives in communion with the beings of the three kingdoms of Nature. What unfolds in his life of feeling between birth and death, in so far as it is the outcome of experiences arising from his environment, is also related to these three kingdoms of Nature. The same applies to what comes from the will, namely, human action. Thus between birth and death man is interwoven with what his senses convey to him from the three kingdoms of Nature.

In like manner between death and a new birth, in the time indicated above, man lives within the higher realms, among the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies. This life together with the Beings of the Hierarchies is, in reality, all action, perpetual activity. We have heard how the spirit-seed of the physical body is produced in cooperation with these higher Beings. Here on Earth, when we perceive or connect ourselves with the entities belonging to the three kingdoms of Nature, we feel outside them. But there is a condition between death and a new birth when we find ourselves wholly within the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies; we are entirely given up to them. That is one of the conditions in which we then live.—Let us picture it clearly.—Here on the Earth, when, for example, we pick a flower, the fact is correctly described by saying, ‘I pick the flower.’ But if this way of speaking were applied to our life together with the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies, the facts would not then be correctly expressed. When we do something in connection with these Beings, we must say: the other Being acts in us. Thus we are in a condition which compels us all the time not to call the activity—in which of course we ourselves partake—our own activity, but the activity of the Beings of the Hierarchies in us. We have in very truth a cosmic consciousness. Just as here we feel heart, lungs and so on, to be within us, so do we then feel the world to be within us, but it is the world of the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies. Everything that takes place is the outcome of an activity in which we, too, are involved; but to describe the facts correctly we should have to say: such and such a Being of the Higher Hierarchies is acting in us.

Now the condition thus described is only one of the conditions obtaining between death and a new birth. We could not be men in the true sense if we lived in this one condition only. In the spiritual world between death and rebirth we should no more be able to bear this condition only, than here on Earth we could bear inbreathing without exhaling. The condition I have just described must alternate with another, which consists in our obliterating through our cosmic consciousness all thinking and feeling about the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies, obliterating too all will that works in this way in us from the Beings of the Hierarchies.

Thus we may say that there are times during the life between death and a new birth when we find ourselves filled through and through with the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies and their radiance. We feel them within ourselves. But there is another condition, in which we have first suppressed and then obliterated altogether, this consciousness of the Higher Beings manifesting in us. Then—to use earthly terms—we are ‘out of our body’—the condition is of course entirely spiritual but let us put it in this way: we are out of our body. In this condition we know nothing of the world that lives within us, but we have as it were ‘come to ourselves.’ We no longer live in the other Beings of the Hierarchies but we live wholly in ourselves. Between death and a new birth, we should never have consciousness of ourselves if we lived only in the one condition. Just as here on Earth, inbreathing must alternate with out-breathing, or sleeping with waking life, so between death and a new birth there must be rhythmic alternation between the inner experience of the whole world of the Hierarchies within us, and a condition in which we have come to ourselves.

Now in a certain sense all earthly life is an outcome of what we have experienced in pre-earthly existence between death and a new birth. As you will remember, I have told you how even such faculties in man's earthly life as walking, speaking, and thinking are transformations of certain activities in pre-earthly existence. Today we will turn our attention more specifically to the life of soul.

What we experience in pre-earthly existence in working together with the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies leaves in us a heritage for our earthly life, a faint shadow of this communion with the Hierarchies. If between death and a new birth we had no such community of life with the Beings of the Hierarchies, we could not unfold, here on Earth, the power of love. The power of love we unfold here on Earth is of course only a faint reflection, a shadow of our communion with the Spirit-Beings of the Higher Hierarchies between death and a new birth, but it is a reflection of that communion. That here on the Earth we are able to unfold human love, sympathetic understanding for another human being, is due to the fact that between death and a new birth we are able to live in communion with the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies.

Spiritual-scientific vision enables us to perceive what happens to those who in previous earthly lives acquired little aptitude—we shall presently speak of how it is acquired—for living together during the appropriate period after death with the Beings of the Hierarchies, in certain states entirely given up to them. Such men here on Earth are incapable of unfolding love in which there is real strength, incapable of unfolding that all-embracing love which comes to expression in the power to understand other men. We may say with truth: it is among the Gods, in pre-earthly existence, that we acquire the gift for observing our fellow-man, to perceive how he thinks and how he feels, to understand him with inner sympathy. If we were deprived of this intercourse with the Gods—for so indeed it may be called—we should never be capable of unfolding here on Earth that insight into other human beings which alone makes earthly life a reality. When in this connection I speak of love, and especially of all-embracing human love, you must think of love as having this real and concrete meaning; you must think of it as signifying a genuine, intimate understanding of the other man. If to the all-embracing love of humanity, this understanding of one's fellow-man is added, we have everything that constitutes human morality. For human morality on Earth—if it is not merely expressed in empty phrases or fine talk or in resolutions not afterwards carried out—depends upon the interest one man takes in another, upon the capability to see into the other man. Those who have the gift of understanding other human beings will receive from this understanding the impulses for a social life imbued with true morality.

So we may also say: everything that constitutes moral life in earthly existence has been acquired by man in pre-earthly existence; from his communion with the Gods there has remained in him the urge to unfold, in the soul at any rate, community on Earth as well. And it is the development of a life where the one man together with the other fulfils the tasks and the mission of the Earth—it is this alone that in reality leads to the moral life on Earth. Thus we see that love, and the outcome of love—morality—are in very truth a consequence of what man has experienced spiritually in pre-earthly existence.

Now let us think of the other condition in the life between death and rebirth, when man's consciousness of communion with the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies has been dimmed, when, as in earthly sleep, the impressions from the environment are silenced, when deliberate communion with the higher Beings ceases and man ‘comes to himself.’ This condition too has a consequence, an echo, a heritage, here in earthly life—and this heritage is the faculty of Memory.

The possibility for us to have experiences at a definite moment and then after a lapse of time to draw forth from the depth of our being something that brings pictures of these experiences into our consciousness—this faculty of memory that is so necessary in our earthly life, is a faint reflection, a shadow, of our independent state of life in the spiritual world. Here on Earth we should only be able to live in the passing moment instead of in our whole past life as far back as a few years after birth, if between death and a new birth we were not able to emerge, as it were, from universal life and be entirely alone, alone in ourselves.

While we are asleep here on Earth, our physical and etheric bodies lie in the bed; our astral body and our Ego are outside the physical and the etheric bodies and are then in a position to experience—unconsciously, it is true—the environment of soul and spirit. Man is unconscious between going to sleep and waking. Nevertheless, as I have already said, he does indeed have experiences during sleep, some of which I have also described. But they do not enter the field of consciousness, and in earthly life this is a necessary state of things. What is the reason for it?

If from the time of going to sleep to that of waking we were to experience what we do in fact experience in our Ego and in our astral body, so strongly and intensely as to be able to bring it into consciousness, then every time on waking we should want to impress into the physical and etheric bodies too, what we experienced in sleep; we should want to make our physical and our etheric bodies into something different from what they are. One who has knowledge of what is experienced between going to sleep and waking, must accustom himself to an act of renunciation. He must be able to say to himself: ‘I will refrain from the desire to press what I experience with my Ego and my astral body during sleep into the physical and etheric bodies, for in earthly life these bodies could not stand it.’

It is quite possible to speak in a grotesque way about these things—indeed they can be made to seem almost comical, although what is said is meant very seriously. During sleep man does in fact experience images of the Cosmos. Because of this he is continually being tempted, as an outcome of his sleep, to give himself, for example, a different countenance. If that which does not, in fact, come to his consciousness were to do so, he would always be wanting to change his face, for the face he actually has would be reminding him all the time of former earthly lives, of sins in former earthly lives. In the morning, before waking, there is actually a strong urge in man to do to the physical body something that is like dressing it in clothes. One who has knowledge of this must consciously refrain from giving way to the urge; otherwise he would fall into a completely disorganized condition; he would perpetually be trying to change his whole organism, especially if in one respect or another it happens to be not quite healthy, or something is wrong with it.

But during life between death and a new birth we experience so consciously that this consciousness leads to the forming and shaping of our next physical body. If this were left to ourselves alone, we should not shape the physical body in accordance with our karma. In reality, however, we form it together with the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies, the Beings who watch over our karma. And so we get the eyes, the nose, and so forth, which in all probability we should not, if it were left to us, have given to ourselves. For there are certain times between death and a new birth when we are intensely egoistic—precisely at those times when the consciousness of our connection with the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies has been dimmed. Our experiences are then so strong and intense that out of the forces they contain the physical body can be formed; and we do in fact form it.

This is an experience of such intensity that it has in it the seed of actual creation. Then, through the very fact that it is much weakened in earthly life, it takes effect partly as earthly love and partly as the faculty of remembrance, as memory.

Here on Earth, the fact that we feel ourselves within an Ego, depends upon memory. If we lived only in the present and had no memories, our Ego would have no inner coherence. In fact, as I have often said, we should not be able to feel ourselves in a strongly marked Ego at all. You can understand how memory as an earthly, shadowlike faculty comes into being. It comes into being through the fact that in pre-earthly existence in the spiritual world, a faculty of tremendous power is present—the faculty whereby in those periods when we ‘come to ourselves’ we prepare our body according to the instructions received from the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies, when, in the other state of existence, we live in union with them.

This faculty is at work, to begin with as a formative force, in our body. In the child, as long as it has no consciousness leading to memory—i.e. in the earliest period of childhood—this stronger creative force still enters into and works with the forces of growth. Then something that is finer, more rarefied, is as it were separated out from these stronger forces—and this is the human faculty of memory.

The fact that here on Earth too, man lives primarily in himself, is again connected with this faculty of memory. Memory is also very much connected with human egoism on the one side and, on the other, with human freedom. Freedom will become a reality in a human being in whose life on Earth there is a true echo of what is experienced in pre-earthly existence as a kind of rhythm: namely, feeling oneself united with the Beings of the Hierarchies, freeing oneself, entering into union again, and so on. Here on Earth the experiences come to expression, not as a rhythm, but as two co-existing human faculties: the faculty of love and the faculty of memory. But a certain heritage from this rhythm in pre-earthly existence can remain with man. If this is so, then in earthly life too, the true relationship will be established in him between memory and love. He will be able on the one side to develop understanding, loving understanding of other men. And on the other side, from his experience of the world together with other human beings, his own re-collective thinking will contribute to his own development, to the strengthening of his own nature.

A true relationship of this kind can remain as a legacy of the rhythm that is an essential in pre-earthly existence. But the true relationship may also be upset. It may, for instance, be that a man is willing to be guided only by what he himself has experienced. This trait is greatly accentuated when a man has little interest in what others experience, little faculty of looking into the hearts and minds of others, when his interest is confined almost entirely to what gradually accumulates in his own store of memories. This again is intimately connected with his Ego, and so egoism is intensified.

Such a man gets ‘out of gear’ with himself, because the true relationship existing between death and rebirth is lacking in him; a certain rhythm is not there. And at the same time, when a man takes interest only in what piles up in his own soul, when he is concerned all the time with himself alone, then he becomes increasingly unfit—if I may put it so—for the experiences between death and a new birth. By being interested only in himself, a man shuts himself off in a certain respect from communion with the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies.

A man in whom love and memory are rightly interrelated evolves the feeling of true human freedom instead of egoistic introspection. For in another respect this feeling of human freedom too is an echo of the emergence from communion with the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies between death and a new birth. The feeling of freedom is the healthy aftermath of that emergence; egoism is the morbid aftermath. And as the life together with the Beings of the Higher Hierarchies between death and a new birth is the basis of man's morality on Earth, so the necessary emergence from life in communion with them is at the same time the basis on Earth for the immorality of men, for their severance from one another, for actions on the part of the one that cut across the actions of the other, and so forth. For this is at the root of all immorality. So you see it is necessary for man to be mindful that what can appear here on the Earth as something injurious, has a definite significance for the higher worlds. On the Earth too it is the case that the air we inhale is healthy, while the air we exhale is unhealthy, capable of begetting illness, for in effect we exhale carbonic acid. So too, that which underlies immorality here on the Earth is something that is necessary for our experience in the spiritual world.

These connections must be studied because, in effect, morality and immorality cannot really be explained in the light of earthly conditions. Anyone who attempts such explanations will inevitably be on the wrong track. For through the fact that man is moral or the reverse, he relates himself, in his life of soul, to a supersensible world. And we may say: By directing men's minds to the study of this relationship to a spiritual world, anthroposophical Spiritual Science has made it possible, for the first time, to acquire a basis for understanding the moral. To a view of the world that will only acknowledge the validity of science dealing with the world of Nature, the moral can only consist in illusions arising from processes of Nature which are supposed to take their course in man as well.

Assume for a moment that the cosmic nebula of Kant and Laplace, with its mechanical forces and mechanical laws, did actually constitute the beginning of Earth-existence; assume that from these whirling nebulae, through the working of neutral laws of Nature, the kingdoms of earthly existence had come into being, and finally Man. If that were so, man's moral impulses would be mere dreams. For everything he calls moral would pass away when, again in accordance with mechanical laws, the Earth had reached her end. No vindication of the reality of the moral life can ever arise from such a world-view if followed honestly to its conclusions. Vindication of the moral can only result when, as in anthroposophical Spiritual Science, those realms of existence are revealed where the moral is as much a reality as the world of Nature is a reality here in the life between birth and death. As plants grow and blossom here, between death and a new birth certain activities unfold when man is among the Gods. These activities are the moral element in its reality, the reality of the moral element. In that realm the moral has reality, whereas on the Earth there is only a reflection of that reality. But man, we must remember, belongs to both worlds. Hence for him, if he can perceive these facts in the light of Spiritual Science, the moral world has reality—but knowledge of this reality can never be derived from physical existence.

Here you have one reason why it is necessary for man to acquire understanding of Spiritual Science. Without Spiritual Science he could not really be honest with his knowledge. He could not honestly ascribe reality to the moral world, because he is not willing to investigate the realm where that reality lies. It is of tremendous importance to understand such a sentence as this in the right way. But there is still another respect in which I want to emphasize how necessary the knowledge attainable through Spiritual Science is to man. Here again we shall have to turn to the realities of another world.

Already when we achieve Imaginative Knowledge—the knowledge that enables us to live in the etheric world instead of in the physical world, so that instead of physical things we perceive the activities (for activities they are) in the ether—already when this is achieved, three-dimensional Space as it is on Earth falls away from our field of experience. To speak of a three-dimensional space has no meaning, for we are then living in Time. Hence from from other standpoints I have spoken of the etheric body as a Time-organism. I have said, for example, that here, in the spatial organism, we have the head and, let us say, the leg; and if we sting or cut our leg the head will feel it. Spatially, in this spatial body, one organ is connected with the others. So in the time-body which consists in processes—processes in which everything lying in the deeper foundations of our human nature between birth and death are involved—every detail is connected with every other.

You will remember that in lectures on Education I have said that if at a certain age in childhood we have learnt to have reverence, this power of reverence is transformed in later years into a power of gentleness and blessing which can be conveyed to other men. On the other hand, those who in childhood were never able to revere in the true way cannot unfold this power to bless in later life. As in the spatial organism the foot or the leg is connected with the head, so youth is connected with old age, and old age with youth. It is only for external physical vision that the world flows in the one direction, from the past into the future. For higher vision there is also the reverse stream, from the future into the past. It is into this stream, as I have described, that we enter after death, journeying backwards.

In the time-organism everything is interconnected. If the spatial organism as a whole is to be in order, you cannot remove essential organs from it. You cannot, for instance, remove any considerable part of your face without ruining the whole organism. Similarly you cannot remove anything belonging to man that takes its course in time. Imagine that in the spatial organism, at the place where your eyes are situated there were some quite different growth—instead of eyes, some kind of tumor. Then you could not see. As the eyes are situated at a definite place in the spatial organism, so in the time-organism—and I now mean not only the time-organism between birth and death but the time-organism in man that reaches beyond all births and deaths—in this time-organism is incorporated everything that exists between birth and death and in this life develops through concepts, ideas, mental pictures, of a spiritual world. And what thus develops are the eyes for beholding supersensible existence. If between birth and death no knowledge of the supersensible world is developed, this will mean blindness in the life in the supersensible world between death and a new birth, just as the absence of eyes means blindness in the spatial organism. Man passes through death even if on Earth he acquires no knowledge of the supersensible world; but he enters then into a world where he sees nothing, where he can only grope his way about.

This is the agonizing experience that is the natural corollary of the materialistic age for one who has true insight into Initiation-Science today. He sees how men on Earth lapse into materialism; but he also knows what this lapse means for the spiritual life. He knows that it means eradication of the eyes, that in the existence awaiting them after death, men will only be able to grope their way about. In olden times, when there was instinctive knowledge of the supersensible world, men passed through the gate of death able to see. That old, instinctive supersensible knowledge is now extinct. Today, spiritual knowledge must be consciously acquired—spiritual knowledge, I say, not clairvoyance. As I have always emphasized, clairvoyance too can be attained, but that is not the essential here. The essential thing is that what is discovered through clairvoyant research shall be understood—as it can be understood—by ordinary human reason, healthy human reason. Clairvoyance is needed to investigate these things, but it is not needed for acquiring the faculty of sight in the supersensible world after death. And anyone who declares that ordinary knowledge acquired through healthy human reason does not give him eyes for supersensible existence but that for this he needs clairvoyance—anyone who speaks like this might just as well declare that man cannot think unless his eyes do the thinking. As little as in physical life the eyes need think, as little does knowledge of the supersensible worlds need clairvoyance for the purposes I have indicated today.

Naturally, there would be no supersensible knowledge on Earth if there were no clairvoyance; but even the seer must make intelligible in the ordinary way what he sees in the supersensible. However powerful a man's clairvoyant faculty might be in earthly life, however clear his vision of the spiritual world, if he were too easy-going to bring into the form of logical, intelligible ideas what he sees in the spiritual world, he would still be blinded in the spiritual world after death.

What constitutes the great suffering for one who has insight into modern Initiation-Science is that he must admit: materialism makes men blind when they pass through the gate of death. And here again is something showing that it is of significance for the whole of cosmic existence whether man today inclines to supersensible knowledge or not. The time when it is essential for him to do so has arrived; the very progress of humanity depends upon man acquiring supersensible knowledge.

Vierter Vortrag

Erinnern wir uns an die Auseinandersetzungen, die ich Ihnen für das Erleben des Menschen zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt gegeben habe. Wir haben aus den verschiedenen Darstellungen die Einsicht gewinnen können, daß dieses Leben des Menschen, vor allen Dingen in seiner Hauptzeit, um die Mitte des Zeitraumes zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt verläuft, daß der Mensch dann in Gemeinschaft lebt mit denjenigen Wesenheiten, welche in meiner «Geheimwissenschaft im Umriß» angeführt sind als die Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien. Dieses Leben mit den Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien ist ein solches, wie es hier für den Menschen, der in seinem physischen Leibe wohnt, mit Bezug auf die Wesenheiten der drei Naturreiche ist.

Alles im Grunde genommen, was wir in unserer irdischen Umgebung haben, gehört den drei Naturreichen an: dem mineralischen oder dem pflanzlichen oder dem tierischen Reiche, oder eben dem physischen Menschenreich, das in dieser Beziehung auch zum Tierreich gerechnet werden kann. Der Mensch hat seine Sinne, und durch die Eindrücke seiner Sinne lebt er mit diesen Wesenheiten der drei Naturreiche zusammen. Dasjenige, was sich in seinem Fühlen entwickelt, das bezieht sich zunächst zwischen Geburt und Tod, insofern es durch Erleben mit der Umgebung gewonnen wird, auch auf diese drei Naturreiche; ebenso das, was aus dem Willen kommt, das menschliche Handeln. Der Mensch lebt also zwischen der Geburt und dem Tode eingewoben in dasjenige, was ihm seine Sinne geben aus den drei Naturreichen heraus.

So lebt der Mensch in der angedeuteten Zeit zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt innerhalb, man könnte sagen, der höheren Reiche, innerhalb der Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien. Und dieses Zusammenleben mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien ist eigentlich ein Tun, eine fortwährende Tätigkeit. Wir haben gesehen, daß der Geistkeim des physischen Leibes im Zusammenarbeiten mit diesen Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien zustande kommt. Hier auf der Erde fühlen wir uns, indem wir die Dinge wahrnehmen, oder indem wir unsere Handlungen innerhalb der Dinge der drei Naturreiche verrichten, außerhalb der andern Wesen. Zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt gibt es einen Zustand, durch den wir uns ganz innerhalb dieser Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien befinden. Wir sind an diese Wesen hingegeben. Das ist der eine Zustand, in dem wir sind. Machen wir uns recht klar, wie er ist.

Wenn wir hier auf der Erde, sagen wir, eine Blume pflücken, dann ist der Tatbestand richtig gegeben, wenn wir sagen: Ich pflücke die Blume. — So ausgedrückt, wäre der Tatbestand nicht richtig gegeben für unser Zusammenleben mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien. Wenn wir da etwas tun im Zusammenhange mit diesen Wesen, so müssen wir sagen: Das andere Wesen tut in uns. - Also wir sind in einem Zustande, durch den wir fortwährend gedrängt sind, die Tätigkeit, an der wir beteiligt sind, nicht als unsere Tätigkeit zu bezeichnen, sondern als die Tätigkeit dieser Wesen der höheren Hierarchien in uns. Wir haben ein kosmisches Bewußtsein. Ebenso wie wir hier Lunge, Herz und so weiter in uns fühlen, so fühlen wir dann die Welt in uns, aber die Welt der Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien und alles, was geschieht, geschieht durch eine Tätigkeit, in die auch wir selbst verwoben sind. Aber wenn wir den Tatbestand richtig bezeichnen wollen, so müssen wir sagen: Irgendein Wesen der höheren Hierarchien tut in uns. - Aber das ist nur der eine Zustand, und wir würden nicht in der rechten Weise Menschen sein können, wenn wir nur in diesem einen Zustande lebten. Wir würden diesen Zustand in der geistigen Welt zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt ebensowenig ertragen können, wie wir hier auf Erden das bloße Einatmen ohne das Ausatmen ertragen könnten. Dieser Zustand, den ich eben geschildert habe, muß mit einem andern wechseln. Und dieser andere Zustand besteht darin, daß wir durch unser kosmisches Bewußtsein alles Denken und Fühlen über die Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien auslöschen, daß wir auch allen Willen auslöschen, der in dieser Weise von den Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien in uns wirkt.

Also wir können sagen, es gibt solche Zeiten innerhalb des Lebens zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt, wo wir uns ganz ausgefüllt finden, lichtvoll ausgefüllt mit den Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien, wo wir diese in uns fühlen. Aber es gibt einen andern Zustand, wo wir zuerst herabgedämpft und dann völlig ausgelöscht haben dieses ganze Bewußtsein von den in uns erscheinenden höheren Wesenheiten. Dann sind wir gewissermaßen, wenn wir jetzt irdische Ausdrücke gebrauchen, aus unserem Körper heraus — es ist ja alles geistig, aber sagen wir einmal so -, wir sind dann aus unserem Körper heraus. Wir wissen nichts von der Welt, die in uns lebt, aber wir sind in solchen Zuständen dann zu uns selbst gekommen. Wir leben nicht mehr in den andern Wesen der höheren Hierarchien, wir leben dann in uns selbst. Wir würden niemals zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt ein Bewußtsein von uns selbst bekommen, wenn wir nur in dem einen Zustand leben würden. Ebenso wie wir hier auf der Erde das Einatmen mit dem Ausatmen abwechseln lassen müssen, oder den Schlaf mit dem Wachen, so müssen wir zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt in einem rhythmischen Wechsel sein zwischen dem inneren Erleben von der ganzen Welt der höheren Hierarchien in uns und einem Zustande, in dem wir zu uns selbst gekommen sind.

Nun ist alles irdische Leben in gewissem Sinne eine Folge, eine Konsequenz desjenigen, was wir zwischen dem Tod und einer neuen Geburt im vorirdischen Dasein erlebt haben. Sie erinnern sich, wie ich Ihnen dargestellt habe, daß auch solche Errungenschaften des menschlichen Erdenlebens, wie Gehen, Sprechen, Denken, Umwandlungen sind von gewissen Betätigungen im vorirdischen Dasein. Wollen wir heute mehr auf das Seelische sehen.

Was wir im vorirdischen Dasein im Zusammentun mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien erleben, läßt für unser Erdenleben gewissermaßen in uns eine Erbschaft zurück, einen schwachen Schatten dieses Zusammenlebens mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien. Hätten wir zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt dieses Zusammenleben mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien nicht, wir könnten hier auf der Erde nicht die Kraft der Liebe entfalten. Denn das, was wir hier auf der Erde als die Kraft der Liebe entfalten, ist allerdings nur ein schwacher Abglanz, ein Schatten des Zusammenlebens mit den Geistwesen der höheren Hierarchien zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt, aber es ist doch eben ein Abglanz, ein Schatten von diesem Zusammenleben. Daß wir hier auf Erden Menschenliebe entfalten können, daß wir hier auf Erden Verständnis entfalten können für einen andern Menschen, rührt davon her, daß wir zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt in der Lage sind, mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien zu leben. Und man kann durch geisteswissenschaftliches Anschauen wohl sehen, wie diejenigen Menschen, die sich in früheren Erdenleben nur eine geringe Gabe erworben haben - wir werden gleich nachher darauf zu sprechen kommen, wie man sich diese Gabe erwirbt -, um nach dem Tode in der geeigneten Zeit mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien richtig zusammenzuleben, ganz hingegeben in gewissen Zuständen an diese Wesen der höheren Hierarchien, wie diese Menschen hier auf der Erde nur eine geringe Kraft der Liebe entfalten, namentlich der allgemeinen Menschenliebe, die sich ausdrückt im Verständnis der andern Menschen.

Unter den Göttern eignen wir uns im vorirdischen Dasein die Gabe an, hinzusehen auf den andern Menschen, aufzumerken, wie er fühlt, wie er denkt, aufzufassen mit innerem Anteil das, was er ist. Und hätten wir nicht - man kann es so nennen - den geschilderten Umgang mit den Göttern, wir würden auf der Erde niemals jenes Hineinschauen in den andern Menschen entfalten können, das allein im Grunde genommen das irdische Leben möglich macht. Sie müssen sogar, wenn ich in diesem Zusammenhange von Liebe und namentlich allgemeiner Menschenliebe spreche, an die Liebe in dieser konkreten Bedeutung denken, wie ich sie eben geschildert habe: in der Bedeutung eines wirklich innigen Verständnisses des andern Menschen. Und wenn man zu der allgemeinen Menschenliebe dieses Verständnis des andern Menschen nimmt, dann hat man zu gleicher Zeit mit dem gegeben alles das, was menschliche Moralität ist. Denn die irdische menschliche Moralität beruht, wenn sie sich nicht in bloßen Phrasen oder schönen Redereien bewegt oder in Vorsätzen, die nicht ausgeführt werden oder dergleichen, auf dem Interesse, das der eine Mensch am andern nimmt, auf der Möglichkeit, in den andern Menschen hinüberzuschauen.

Derjenige Mensch, der Menschenverständnis hat, wird aus diesem Menschenverständnis eben die sozial-moralischen Antriebe empfangen. So daß man auch sagen kann, alles moralische Leben innerhalb des Erdendaseins hat der Mensch errungen im vorirdischen Dasein, so errungen, daß ihm von dem Zusammenleben mit den Göttern der Drang bleibt, ein solches Zusammenleben wenigstens in der Seele auch auf Erden auszugestalten. Und dieses Ausgestalten eines solchen Zusammenlebens, so daß der eine Mensch mit dem andern die Erdenaufgaben, die Erdenmission vollbringt, das führt allein in Wirklichkeit zu dem moralischen Leben auf der Erde. Wir sehen also, daß Liebe und die Wirkung der Liebe, die Moralität, durchaus eine Folge, eine Konsequenz desjenigen sind, was der Mensch im vorirdischen Dasein geistig durchgemacht hat.

Betrachten wir jetzt den andern Zustand, wo der Mensch sein Bewußtsein für das Zusammenleben mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien abgedämpft hat, wo gewissermaßen wie im irdischen Schlafe die Eindrücke aus der Umgebung schweigen, wo dieses willensmäßige Zusammenleben mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien schweigt, wo der Mensch also zu sich selber kommt zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt. Auch dieser Zustand hat eine Konsequenz, einen Nachklang, eine Erbschaft hier im Erdenleben, und das ist die Kraft der Erinnerung, des Gedächtnisses.

Die Möglichkeit, daß wir Erlebnisse haben zu einer bestimmten Zeit und dann nach einiger Zeit aus den Tiefen unseres Menschenwesens etwas heraufholen können, was in unser Bewußtsein herein Bilder von diesen Erlebnissen bringt, also die Kraft des Gedächtnisses, die wir im irdischen Leben so notwendig haben, ist ein schwacher Abglanz, ein Schatten unseres selbständigen Lebens in der geistigen Welt. Wir würden hier auf der Erde nur im Augenblicke leben können, nicht in unserer ganzen irdischen Vergangenheit bis ein paar Jahre nach der Geburt hin, wenn wir nicht auch zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt in die Lage kämen, gewissermaßen aus dem Weltenwesen herauszugehen und ganz mit uns selber zu sein.

Wenn wir hier auf Erden schlafen, da ist unser physischer und unser Ätherleib im Bette. Unser astralischer Leib und unser Ich sind außerhalb dieses physischen und dieses Ätherleibes, sie sind in der Lage, allerdings unbewußt, mitzuerleben, was dann in der geistig-seelischen Umgebung des Menschen ist. Der Mensch ist unbewußt zwischen dem Einschlafen und dem Aufwachen. Daß der Mensch Erlebnisse hat zwischen dem Einschlafen und Aufwachen, habe ich Ihnen geschildert. Ich habe Ihnen auch die einzelnen Erlebnisse geschildert, aber ins Bewußtsein kommen die Erlebnisse nicht herein. Das muß im irdischen Leben so sein. Warum? Würden wir vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen in unserem Ich und in unserem astralischen Leibe das, was wir erleben, so stark erleben, daß wir es zum Bewußtsein bringen könnten, dann würden wir jedesmal, wenn wir aufwachen, das, was wir erlebt haben im Schlafe, auch in den physischen und in den Ätherleib hineindrücken, und wir würden jedesmal unseren physischen und unseren Ätherleib zu einem ganz andern machen wollen. Wer eine Kenntnis hat von dem, was zwischen dem Einschlafen und Aufwachen erlebt wird, der muß sich eine große Entsagung angewöhnen. Der muß sich nämlich sagen können: Ich verzichte darauf, das, was ich zwischen dem Einschlafen und dem Aufwachen mit meinem Ich und mit meinem astralischen Leibe erlebe, in den physischen und in den Ätherleib hineindrücken zu wollen, denn die vertragen das nicht in der Zeit des Erdenlebens.

Man könnte manchmal über diese Dinge grotesk reden; dann sieht es fast komisch aus, aber die Dinge sind sehr ernst gemeint. So erlebt der Mensch tatsächlich, wie ich einmal hier habe schildern können, eigentlich Nachbilder des Kosmos. Dadurch ist er immer versucht, aus dem Schlaf heraus zum Beispiel sich ein anderes Antlitz zu geben. Würde das, was nicht zum Bewußtsein kommt, zum Bewußtsein des Menschen kommen, so würde er fortwährend sein Gesicht ändern wollen, weil ihn dieses Gesicht, das er hat, fortwährend wieder an frühere Erdenleben, an Sünden in früheren Erdenleben erinnert. Es ist im Menschen am Morgen vor dem Aufwachen schon ein starker Drang vorhanden, mit dem physischen Leib so etwas zu machen, wie wenn man ihm Kleider anzieht. Wer Kenntnis davon hat, muß bewußt darauf Verzicht leisten, sonst würde er ganz und gar in Unordnung kommen, er würde fortwährend seinen ganzen Organismus ändern wollen, insbesondere, wenn dieser Organismus nach irgendeiner Richtung nicht ganz gesund ist und dergleichen.

Aber wenn wir in dem Leben zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt sind, da erleben wir so bewußt, daß dieses Bewußtsein dahin führt, unseren nächsten physischen Leib zu gestalten. Wäre uns das ganz selbst überlassen, dann würden wir diesen physischen Leib nicht nach dem Karma gestalten. Aber wir gestalten ihn im Zusammenhange mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien, die über unser Karma wachen. Und so bekommen wir zum Beispiel diejenigen Augen, diejenige Nase und so weiter, die wir uns selber wohl kaum geben würden, denn wir sind in gewissen Augenblicken zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt außerordentlich egoistisch, gerade dann, wenn wir dieses Bewußtsein des Zusammenhanges mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien abgedämpft haben, denn dann erleben wir so stark, daß der physische Leib aus den Kräften dieses Erlebens gestaltet werden kann. Wir gestalten ihn ja auch. Das ist also ein viel intensiveres Erleben, ein Leben, das den Keim des Schaffens in sich hat. Und eben, indem es im Erdenleben ganz abgeschwächt ist, erlebt es sich zum Teil als die irdische Liebe, zum Teil, wie ich dargestellt habe, als die Erinnerung, die Erinnerungsfähigkeit, als das Gedächtnis.

Von diesem Gedächtnis hängt es hier auf Erden ab, daß wir uns so recht in einem Ich fühlen. Würden wir nur in der Gegenwart leben, keine Erinnerungen haben, so würde unser Ich keinen inneren Zusammenhang haben. Wir würden uns überhaupt - ich habe das schon öfter ausgeführt — nicht in einem ausgesprochenen Ich fühlen können. Aber Sie sehen zugleich, diese Erinnerung kommt als irdische schattenhafte Fähigkeit dadurch zustande, daß in der geistigen Welt im vorirdischen Dasein eine mächtige Fähigkeit vorhanden ist: die Fähigkeit, die wir, ich möchte sagen, nach den Anweisungen der Wesenheiten höherer Hierarchien bekommen, wenn wir in dem andern Zustand mit ihnen leben, die Fähigkeit, daß wir nach den Anweisungen dieser Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien dann, wenn wir zu uns selbst kommen, unseren Leib vorbereiten.

Was also in unserem Leibe als Gestaltungskraft wirkt, was noch im Kinde als Gestaltungskraft nachwirkt, solange das Kind kein zum Gedächtnis führendes Bewußtsein hat, wie es in den ersten kindlichen Lebenszeiten der Fall ist, diese stärkere Kraft sehen wit, wie sie noch in die Wachstumskräfte hineingeht. Dann sondert sich gewissermaßen etwas aus diesen stärkeren Kräften aus, was dünner ist, feiner ist, und das ist die menschliche Erinnerungsfähigkeit, das ist das Gedächtnis.

Mit diesem Gedächtnis hängt es wiederum zusammen, daß der Mensch vor allen Dingen auch auf Erden mit sich selbst lebt. Dieses Gedächtnis hängt aber auch sehr stark zusammen mit dem, was auf der einen Seite der menschliche Egoismus und auf der andern Seite die menschliche Freiheit ist. Freiheit wird entstehen bei einem Menschen, der richtig nachlebt, was im vorirdischen Dasein als eine Art Rhythmus erlebt werden muß: Sich-Fühlen mit den Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien, herauskommen aus diesem Sich-Fühlen, dann wieder hineinkommen und so weiter. Hier lebt es sich nebeneinander aus, nicht als ein Rhythmus, sondern als zwei nebeneinander bestehende Fähigkeiten des Menschen: die Fähigkeit zur Liebe, die Fähigkeit des Gedächtnisses. Aber es kann dem Menschen eine gewisse Erbschaft dieses Rhythmus im vorirdischen Dasein bleiben. Dann werden das Gedächtnis und die Liebe zueinander auch im Erdenleben das richtige Verhältnis haben. Der Mensch wird auf der einen Seite Verständnis, liebevolles Verständnis entwickeln können für die andern Menschen, und er wird auch in sein erinnerndes Denken hereinnehmen, was ihm selber zu seiner eigenen Vervollkommnung, zu der eigenen Verfestigung seines Wesens werden kann aus dem Erleben der Welt mit andern Menschen.

Es kann ein solches richtiges Verhältnis zurückbleiben aus dem notwendigen Rhythmus im vorirdischen Dasein, aber es kann auch dieses Verhältnis gestört sein, so daß der Mensch zum Beispiel immerfort sich auf das richtet, was er selber erlebt hat. Das ist ganz besonders dann der Fall, wenn der Mensch wenig Interesse dafür hat, was die Menschen außer ihm erleben, wenn er wenig hinüberschauen kann in die andern Gemüter, wenn er vorzugsweise das Interesse für dasjenige entwickelt, was sich allmählich in seinem eigenen Erinnern, in seinem eigenen Gedächtnis ansammelt, denn das hängt wiederum innig zusammen mit seinem Ich, das verstärkt den Egoismus.

Ein solcher Mensch kommt gewissermaßen dadurch in Unordnung mit sich selber, daß er nicht dieses zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt ganz bestimmt richtige Verhältnis, daß er nämlich nicht einen Rhythmus hat. Und zu gleicher Zeit, wenn der Mensch nur für das Interesse bekommt, was in seinem eigenen Seelenwesen sich aufspeichert, wenn er sich gewissermaßen immer nur mit sich selber beschäftigt, dann speichert sich auf, ich möchte sagen, eine Talentlosigkeit gegenüber dem Erleben zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt. Durch dieses Nur-für-sich-selbst-Interessiertsein verschließt sich der Mensch in einer gewissen Beziehung für das Zusammenleben mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien.

Derjenige aber, der das richtige Verhältnis hat zwischen Liebe und Gedächtnis, entwickelt statt des bloß egoistisch In-sich-Hineinschauens das menschliche Freiheitsgefühl. Denn dieses menschliche Freiheitsgefühl ist in anderer Beziehung auch ein Nachklang des Heraustretens aus dem Zusammenleben mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt. Man möchte sagen: Das Freiheitsgefühl ist das gesunde Nacherleben dieses Heraustretens; der Egoismus ist das kranke Nacherleben dieses Heraustretens. — Und so, wie das Zusammenleben mit den Wesen der höheren Hierarchien zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt die Grundlage der Moralität des Menschen auf Erden ist, so ist das Heraustreten aus diesem Zusammenleben, das notwendig ist, zugleich auf Erden die Grundlage für die Unmoralität der Menschen, für das Auseinandergehen der Menschen, für das Handeln der Menschen so, daß die Handlungen des einen die Handlungen des andern stören und so weiter, denn darauf beruht dennoch alle Unmoralität. Sie sehen, daß der Mensch nötig hat, darauf zu achten, inwiefern irgend etwas, was hier auf der Erde als eine Schädlichkeit auftreten kann, für die höheren Welten eine bestimmte Bedeutung hat. Es ist auch auf Erden so, daß die Einatmungsluft gesund, die Ausatmungsluft ungesund, ja krankmachend ist, denn wir atmen Kohlensäure aus. So ist das, was hier auf Erden die Grundlage der Unmoralität ist, etwas, was notwendig ist für unser Erleben in der geistigen Welt.

Diese Zusammenhänge muß man aus dem Grunde betrachten, weil aus den irdischen Verhältnissen heraus Moralität und Unmoralität eigentlich nicht zu erklären sind. Wer solche Erklärungen versucht, wird immer fehlgehen müssen. Denn dadurch, daß der Mensch moralisch oder unmoralisch ist, setzt er sich schon seelisch in eine Beziehung zu einer Welt, die im Übersinnlichen liegt. Und wir dürfen sagen: Indem anthroposophische Geisteswissenschaft in der angedeuteten Weise des Menschen Sinn hinneigen macht zur Betrachtung dieses Verhältnisses zu einer übersinnlichen Welt, macht sie eigentlich erst möglich, daß man eine Grundlage bekommt, um das Moralische ins Auge zu fassen. Für die Betrachtungsweise der Welt, die nur eine Naturerkenntnis zugeben will, kann das Moralische nur in Scheinbildern, in Illusionen bestehen, die sich aus den Naturvorgängen heraus ergeben, die sich auch im Menschen abspielen sollen.

Nehmen Sie einmal an, es wäre wirklich so, daß am Beginne des Erdendaseins der Kant-Laplacesche Weltnebel mit seinen mechanischen Kräften und mechanischen Gesetzen stände, und nehmen Sie an, aus diesen wirbelnden Nebelmassen hätten sich nach und nach durch gleichgültige, neutrale Naturgesetze die Reiche des irdischen Daseins ergeben, und es wäre zuletzt der Mensch aus alldem heraufgestiegen, dann wären eben seine moralischen Impulse Träume. Denn alles dasjenige, was er moralisch nennt, würde vergehen, wenn die Erde wiederum nach mechanischen Gesetzen am Ende angelangt und im Wärmetod verschwinden würde. Aus einer solchen Anschauung kann niemals eine Rechtfertigung des moralischen Lebens folgen, wenn man ehrlich die letzten Konsequenzen dieser Weltanschauung zugeben will. Eine Rechtfertigung desMoralischen ergibt sich einzig und allein dadurch, daß man, so wie es anthroposophische Geisteswissenschaft tut, diejenigen Gebiete des Daseins aufzeigt, wo das Moralische eine solche Realität hat wie das Natürliche hier in dem Leben zwischen der Geburt und dem Tode. Wie hier Pflanzen wachsen und blühen, so entwickeln sich gewisse Betätigungen, wenn der Mensch zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt unter den Göttern ist. Und diese Betätigungen sind das Moralische in Realität, sind die Wirklichkeit des Moralischen. Dieses Moralische hat da Realität, während auf der Erde nur ein Abglanz von dieser Realität vorhanden ist. Aber der Mensch gehört eben beiden Welten an. Daher hat für ihn, wenn er das tichtig durchschaut im geisteswissenschaftlichen Sinne, die moralische Welt eine ebensolche Realität, nur kann man sie niemals aus dem physischen Dasein heraus erkennen.

Dadurch aber haben Sie die eine Notwendigkeit gegeben, warum es für den Menschen notwendig ist, sich Geisteswissenschaft anzueignen. Der Mensch könnte ohne diese Geisteswissenschaft nicht ehrlich sein mit seinem Wissen, denn er könnte nicht der moralischen Welt Realität zuerkennen, weil er das Gebiet nicht erforschen will, dem die Realität der moralischen Welt angehört. Das ist etwas ungeheuer Bedeutungsvolles, solch einen Satz in der richtigen Weise zu verstehen.

Aber noch in einer andern Beziehung möchte ich Ihnen gerade heute hervorheben, inwiefern das Wissen, das durch die Geisteswissenschaft erworben werden kann, für den Menschen eine Notwendigkeit ist. Auch da werden wir wiederum hinblicken müssen auf die Realitäten einer andern Welt. Schon wenn man nur bis zur imaginativen Erkenntnis aufsteigt, bis zu derjenigen Erkenntnis, die einem also gestattet, statt in der physischen Welt in der Ätherwelt zu leben, so daß man statt der physischen Dinge die Tätigkeiten im Äther wahrnimmt — denn Tätigkeiten sind es —, schon wenn man dazu aufsteigt, entfällt einem der Raum, so wie er auf der Erde hier ist. Der dreidimensionale Raum entfällt einem. Es hat keinen Sinn, von dem dreidimensionalen Raum zu sprechen, denn im wesentlichen leben wir dann in der Zeit. Deshalb habe ich Ihnen auch hier bei andern Betrachtungsweisen den Ätherleib als einen Zeitorganismus dargestellt. So wie wir hier im Raumesorganismus zum Beispiel den Kopf haben und, sagen wir das Bein, und wie Sie es im Kopfe spüren, wenn Sie sich in das Bein stechen oder schneiden, wie also ein Organ mit dem andern räumlich für diesen Raumesleib zusammenhängt, so hängen im Zeitenleibe, der in Geschehen besteht, in Geschehen von alledem, was tiefer zugrunde liegt unserem Menschenwesen zwischen der Geburt und dem Tode, so hängen da alle diese Einzelheiten zusammen.

Erinnern Sie sich, wie ich in Vorträgen zum Beispiel über Pädagogik gesagt habe: Wenn man in einer gewissen Zeit des Kindesalters verehren gelernt hat, verwandelt sich diese Kraft der Verehrung im späteren Alter in eine gewisse segnende Milde, die man für andere Menschen haben kann, während derjenige, der in der Kindheit niemals die Gelegenheit gehabt hat, richtig zu verehren, diese segnende Milde nicht entfalten kann im späteren Alter. - So wie der Fuß oder das Bein mit dem Kopf zusammenhängt im Raumesorganismus, so hängt die Jugend mit dem Alter zusammen, und ich könnte auch sagen, das Alter mit der Jugend. Denn nur für das äußere physische Anschauen verfließt die Welt nach einer Seite, von der Vergangenheit nach der Zukunft. Für das höhere Anschauen gibt es auch den umgekehrten Strom: von der Zukunft in die Vergangenheit. Wir gehen in diesen Strom, wie ich beschrieben habe, ein nach dem Tode, rückwärts wandernd. Es hängt auch in diesem Zeitenorganismus alles zusammen. Ebenso wie Sie aus dem Raumesorganismus gewisse Organe nicht entfernen können, wie sie da sein müssen, damit der ganze Organismus in Ordnung ist, wie Sie zum Beispiel nicht einen großen Teil. Ihres Gesichtes entfernen können, ohne den Organismus zu zerstören, ebensowenig können Sie aus dem, was am Menschen in der Zeit fortfließt, irgend etwas entfernen.

Nun denken Sie, es wäre am Raumesorganismus an der Stelle, wo Sie Ihre Augen haben, ein ganz anderes Wachstum, so daß nicht Augen entständen, sondern irgendwie Geschwülste. Dann könnten Sie nicht sehen. Wie die Augen am Raumesorganismus an einer bestimmten Stelle sind, so ist im Zeitorganismus — und mit dem meine ich jetzt nicht nur den Zeitorganismus zwischen Geburt und Tod, sondern den Zeitorganismus, der über alle Tode und alle Geburten beim Menschen hinausgeht -, eingegliedert dasjenige, was zwischen Geburt und Tod ist und sich in diesem Dasein zwischen Geburt und Tod durch Begriffe, durch Ideen, durch Vorstellungen einer geistigen Welt entwickelt. Und das, was sich da entwickelt, sind die Augen für das übersinnliche Dasein. Wenn Sie hier zwischen der Geburt und dem Tode kein Wissen über die übersinnliche Welt entwickeln, so bedeutet das für das Dasein in der übersinnlichen Welt zwischen dem Tode und einer neuen Geburt ein Geblendetsein, wie das Fehlen der Augen am Raumesorganismus ein Geblendetsein bedeutet. Man geht durch den Tod, auch wenn man hier auf der Erde kein Wissen von der übersinnlichen Welt entwickelt, aber man tritt in eine Welt ein, in der man nichts sieht, sondern in der man sich nur forttasten kann.

Das ist der ungeheure Schmerz, der, ich möchte sagen, als das Gegenbild des materialistischen Zeitalters für denjenigen erscheint, der heute in die Initiationswissenschaft richtig hineinschaut. Er sieht, wie auf der Erde die Menschen in den Materialismus verfallen. Er weiß aber auch, was dieses Verfallen in den Materialismus für das geistige Dasein bedeutet, er weiß, daß das ein Augenausreißen ist, daß es bedeutet, daß die Menschen im Dasein, das ihrer nach dem Tode wartet, nur tasten können. In älteren Zeiten der Menschheitsentwickelung, wo es ein instinktives Wissen von der übersinnlichen Welt gab, traten die Menschen durch die Pforte des Todes, indem sie sehen konnten. Dieses alte instinktive übersinnliche Wissen ist erloschen. Heute muß bewußt geistiges Wissen erworben werden, wohlgemerkt: geistiges Wissen, nicht Hellsehen! Ich habe immer betont: Hellsehen kann auch erworben werden, aber das ist es nicht, worauf es ankommt, sondern das Verstehen desjenigen, was durch die hellseherische Forschung zustande kommt, durch den gewöhnlichen gesunden Menschenverstand, denn es kann dadurch verstanden werden.

Wer behauptet, daß das gewöhnliche Wissen durch den gesunden Menschenverstand ihm nicht das Auge gibt für das übersinnliche Dasein, daß er dazu Hellsehen braucht — Hellsehen braucht man, um die Dinge zu erforschen, aber man braucht es nicht, um sich die Fähigkeit des Sehens in der übersinnlichen Welt nach dem Tode zu erwerben -, wer das behauptet, der mag nur gleich behaupten, man könne nicht denken, wenn nicht die Augen denken. So wenig die Augen hier im physischen Leben zu denken brauchen, so wenig braucht das Wissen von den übersinnlichen Welten für dasjenige, was ich heute angedeutet habe, die Hellsichtigkeit zu haben. Es würde auf der Erde natürlich kein übersinnliches Wissen geben, wenn es nicht eine Hellsichtigkeit gäbe, aber selbst der Hellseher muß in gewöhnliches Begreifen verwandeln, was er im Übersinnlichen schaut. Würde ein Mensch hier auf Erden noch so hellsehend sein, würde er noch so klar in die geistige Welt hineinschauen — wenn er zu bequem wäre, das, was er schaut in der geistigen Welt, in ordentliche, logisch begreifbare Vorstellungen zu verwandeln, er würde dennoch nach dem Tode in der geistigen Welt geblendet sein.

Das, sage ich, ist der große Schmerz für den, der in die Initiationswissenschaft der Gegenwart hineinschaut, daß er sich sagen muß: Der Materialismus macht die Leute blind, wenn sie durch die Pforte des Todes treten. - Und da haben wir wiederum etwas, an dem man sieht, daß es für die Realität, für das ganze Weltendasein eine Bedeutung hat, ob der Mensch sich heute hinneigt zu einem übersinnlichen Wissen oder nicht. Die Zeit, wo er das tun soll, ist eben gekommen. Es liegt im Fortschritt der Menschheit, heute zu übersinnlichem Wissen aufzusteigen.

Fourth Lecture

Let us recall the arguments I have given you for the experience of man between death and a new birth. From the various presentations we have been able to gain the insight that this life of the human being, above all in his main time, takes place around the middle of the period between death and a new birth, that the human being then lives in communion with those entities which are mentioned in my “Secret Science in Outline” as the entities of the higher hierarchies. This life with the beings of the higher hierarchies is such as it is here for the human being who dwells in his physical body with reference to the beings of the three kingdoms of nature.

In essence, everything we have in our earthly environment belongs to the three kingdoms of nature: the mineral or the vegetable or the animal kingdom, or the physical human kingdom, which in this respect can also be counted as part of the animal kingdom. Man has his senses, and through the impressions of his senses he lives together with these entities of the three kingdoms of nature. That which develops in his feelings is initially related to these three kingdoms of nature between birth and death, insofar as it is gained through experience with the environment; likewise that which comes from the will, human action. Between birth and death, therefore, man lives interwoven with that which his senses give him from the three kingdoms of nature.

So man lives in the indicated time between death and a new birth within, one could say, the higher kingdoms, within the beings of the higher hierarchies. And this living together with the beings of the higher hierarchies is actually an activity, a continuous activity. We have seen that the spiritual germ of the physical body comes about in cooperation with these beings of the higher hierarchies. Here on earth we feel ourselves by perceiving things, or by carrying out our actions within the things of the three kingdoms of nature, outside the other beings. Between death and a new birth there is a state through which we are completely within these beings of the higher hierarchies. We are devoted to these beings. That is the one state we are in. Let's be quite clear about what it is.

When we pick a flower here on earth, let us say, then the fact is correctly given when we say: I pick the flower. - Expressed in this way, the facts would not be correct for our coexistence with the beings of the higher hierarchies. When we do something in connection with these beings, we must say: The other being does something in us. - So we are in a state in which we are constantly urged to describe the activity in which we are involved not as our activity, but as the activity of these beings of the higher hierarchies within us. We have a cosmic consciousness. Just as we feel lungs, heart and so on within us here, so then we feel the world within us, but the world of the beings of the higher hierarchies and everything that happens, happens through an activity in which we ourselves are also interwoven. But if we want to describe the facts correctly, we must say that some being of the higher hierarchies is doing something in us. - But this is only one state, and we would not be able to be human beings in the right way if we only lived in this one state. We would not be able to endure this state in the spiritual world between death and a new birth any more than we could endure mere inhalation without exhalation here on earth. This state, which I have just described, must alternate with another. And this other state consists in the fact that through our cosmic consciousness we extinguish all thinking and feeling about the beings of the higher hierarchies, that we also extinguish all will that works in us in this way from the beings of the higher hierarchies.

So we can say that there are times in life between death and a new birth when we find ourselves completely filled, light-filled with the beings of the higher hierarchies, when we feel them within us. But there is another state where we have first dampened down and then completely extinguished this whole consciousness of the higher beings appearing in us. Then we are to a certain extent, if we now use earthly expressions, out of our body - it is all spiritual, but let us put it this way - we are then out of our body. We know nothing of the world that lives within us, but in such states we have come to ourselves. We no longer live in the other beings of the higher hierarchies, we then live in ourselves. We would never become conscious of ourselves between death and a new birth if we only lived in one state. Just as here on earth we must alternate between breathing in and breathing out, or between sleep and waking, so between death and a new birth we must alternate rhythmically between the inner experience of the whole world of the higher hierarchies within us and a state in which we have come to ourselves.

Now all earthly life is in a certain sense a result, a consequence of what we have experienced between death and a new birth in the pre-earthly existence. You remember, as I have shown you, that such achievements of human life on earth, such as walking, speaking, thinking, are also transformations of certain activities in the pre-earthly existence. Let us look more at the soul today.

What we experience in the pre-earthly existence in association with the beings of the higher hierarchies leaves a kind of legacy in us for our earthly life, a faint shadow of this coexistence with the beings of the higher hierarchies. If we did not have this coexistence with the beings of the higher hierarchies between death and a new birth, we would not be able to develop the power of love here on earth. For what we develop here on earth as the power of love is only a faint reflection, a shadow of the coexistence with the spirit beings of the higher hierarchies between death and a new birth, but it is nevertheless a reflection, a shadow of this coexistence. The fact that we can develop human love here on earth, that we can develop understanding for another human being here on earth, stems from the fact that we are able to live with the beings of the higher hierarchies between death and a new birth. And through spiritual-scientific observation one can well see how those people who have acquired only a small gift in earlier earthly lives - we will come to this in a moment how one acquires this gift - in order to live together properly with the beings of the higher hierarchies after death in the appropriate time, completely devoted in certain states to these beings of the higher hierarchies, how these people here on earth develop only a small power of love, namely of general human love, which expresses itself in the understanding of other people.

Among the gods we acquire the gift in our pre-earthly existence to look at the other human being, to notice how he feels, how he thinks, to grasp what he is with inner compassion. And if we did not have - you could call it that - the contact with the gods described above, we would never be able to develop on earth that ability to look into the other person, which alone makes earthly life possible. In fact, when I speak of love in this context, and in particular of general human love, you must think of love in the concrete sense I have just described: in the sense of a truly intimate understanding of the other person. And if one takes this understanding of the other person in addition to general human love, then one has at the same time given with it everything that is human morality. For earthly human morality, if it is not based on mere phrases or fine speeches or on intentions that are not carried out or the like, is based on the interest that one person takes in another, on the possibility of looking over into the other person.

A person who has an understanding of man will receive the social and moral impulses from this understanding of man. So that one can also say that all moral life within the earthly existence has been acquired by man in the pre-earthly existence, acquired in such a way that from living together with the gods the urge remains for him to form such a living together at least in the soul also on earth. And this shaping of such a life together, so that one man accomplishes the earthly tasks, the earthly mission with the other, that alone leads in reality to the moral life on earth. So we see that love and the effect of love, morality, are definitely a result, a consequence of what man has gone through spiritually in the pre-earthly existence.

Let us now look at the other state, where man has dampened his consciousness for living together with the beings of the higher hierarchies, where, as it were, as in earthly sleep, the impressions from the surroundings are silent, where this will-like living together with the beings of the higher hierarchies is silent, where man therefore comes to himself between death and a new birth. This state also has a consequence, an echo, an inheritance here in earthly life, and that is the power of remembrance, of memory.

The possibility that we have experiences at a certain time and then after some time can bring up something from the depths of our human being that brings images of these experiences into our consciousness, that is, the power of memory, which we have so necessary in earthly life, is a faint reflection, a shadow of our independent life in the spiritual world. We would only be able to live here on earth in the moment, not in our entire earthly past until a few years after birth, if we were not also in a position between death and a new birth to step out of the world being, so to speak, and be completely with ourselves.

When we sleep here on earth, our physical and etheric bodies are in bed. Our astral body and our ego are outside this physical and etheric body, they are able to experience, albeit unconsciously, what is then in the spiritual-soul environment of the human being. The human being is unconscious between falling asleep and waking up. I have described to you that man has experiences between falling asleep and waking up. I have also described the individual experiences to you, but the experiences do not enter consciousness. That must be the case in earthly life. Why? If we were to experience what we experience in our ego and in our astral body so strongly from the time we fall asleep until we wake up that we could bring it to consciousness, then every time we wake up we would also press what we have experienced in sleep into the physical and etheric body, and we would want to make our physical and etheric body into a completely different one every time. Whoever has a knowledge of what is experienced between falling asleep and waking up must get into the habit of a great renunciation. He must be able to say to himself: I renounce wanting to press into the physical and etheric body what I experience between falling asleep and waking up with my ego and with my astral body, because they cannot tolerate it during the time of life on earth.

One could sometimes speak grotesquely about these things; then it looks almost comical, but the things are meant very seriously. As I once described here, man actually experiences afterimages of the cosmos. As a result, he is always tempted to give himself a different face out of sleep, for example. If that which does not come to consciousness were to come to man's consciousness, he would constantly want to change his face, because the face he has constantly reminds him of earlier earthly lives, of sins in earlier earthly lives. In the morning before waking up, there is already a strong urge to do something with the physical body, like putting clothes on it. Whoever is aware of this must consciously renounce it, otherwise he would become completely disordered, he would constantly want to change his whole organism, especially if this organism is not completely healthy in any direction and the like.

But when we are in the life between death and a new birth, we experience so consciously that this consciousness leads us to form our next physical body. If this were left entirely to us, then we would not shape this physical body according to karma. But we form it in connection with the beings of the higher hierarchies who watch over our karma. And so we get, for example, those eyes, that nose and so on, which we would hardly give ourselves, for we are extraordinarily egoistic in certain moments between death and a new birth, precisely when we have dampened this consciousness of the connection with the beings of the higher hierarchies, for then we experience so strongly that the physical body can be formed from the forces of this experience. We also shape it. This is therefore a much more intense experience, a life that has the seed of creation in it. And precisely because it is completely attenuated in earthly life, it experiences itself partly as earthly love and partly, as I have described, as memory, the ability to remember, as memory.

It depends on this memory here on earth that we really feel ourselves in a self. If we lived only in the present and had no memories, our ego would have no inner coherence. We would not be able to feel ourselves at all - I have already explained this several times - in a distinct ego. But you see at the same time, this memory comes about as an earthly shadowy ability through the fact that a powerful ability is present in the spiritual world in the pre-earthly existence: the ability that we receive, I would like to say, according to the instructions of the beings of higher hierarchies when we live with them in the other state, the ability that we then prepare our body according to the instructions of these beings of the higher hierarchies when we come to ourselves.

What therefore works in our body as a formative power, what still continues to work in the child as a formative power, as long as the child has no consciousness leading to memory, as is the case in the first periods of a child's life, we see this stronger power as it still enters into the forces of growth. Then, to a certain extent, something separates itself from these stronger forces that is thinner, finer, and that is the human ability to remember, that is memory.

It is again connected with this memory that man lives with himself above all on earth. But this memory is also very strongly connected with what is human egoism on the one hand and human freedom on the other. Freedom will arise in a person who correctly lives up to what must be experienced as a kind of rhythm in pre-earthly existence: Feeling oneself with the beings of the higher hierarchies, coming out of this feeling, then coming in again and so on. Here it lives itself out side by side, not as a rhythm, but as two coexisting human abilities: the ability to love and the ability to remember. But man can retain a certain inheritance of this rhythm in his pre-earthly existence. Then memory and love will also have the right relationship to each other in earthly life. On the one hand, man will be able to develop understanding, loving understanding for other people, and he will also take into his reminiscent thinking what can become his own perfection, his own consolidation of his being from experiencing the world with other people.

Such a correct relationship can remain from the necessary rhythm in the pre-earthly existence, but this relationship can also be disturbed, so that the human being, for example, constantly focuses on what he has experienced himself. This is particularly the case when a person has little interest in what people other than himself are experiencing, when he can see little into the minds of others, when he prefers to develop an interest in that which gradually accumulates in his own memory, in his own memory, for this in turn is intimately connected with his ego, which reinforces egoism.

Such a person gets into disorder with himself, so to speak, because he does not have this very definite correct relationship between death and a new birth, namely that he does not have a rhythm. And at the same time, if a person is only interested in what is stored up in his own soul being, if he is, so to speak, only ever concerned with himself, then he stores up, I would like to say, a lack of talent in relation to the experience between death and a new birth. By being only interested in himself, man closes himself off in a certain respect to living together with the beings of the higher hierarchies.

However, the one who has the right relationship between love and memory develops the human feeling of freedom instead of the merely egoistic introspection. For this human feeling of freedom is in another respect also a reverberation of stepping out of coexistence with the beings of the higher hierarchies between death and a new birth. One might say: the feeling of freedom is the healthy after-experience of this stepping out; egoism is the sick after-experience of this stepping out. - And just as the coexistence with the beings of the higher hierarchies between death and a new birth is the basis of man's morality on earth, so the stepping out of this coexistence, which is necessary, is at the same time the basis on earth for the immorality of men, for the separation of men, for the actions of men in such a way that the actions of one disturb the actions of the other and so on, for all immorality is nevertheless based on this. You see that man has to pay attention to the extent to which something that can occur here on earth as a harmfulness has a certain meaning for the higher worlds. It is also the case on earth that the air we breathe in is healthy, while the air we breathe out is unhealthy, even pathogenic, because we breathe out carbonic acid. Thus, what is the basis of immorality here on earth is something that is necessary for our experience in the spiritual world.

These connections have to be considered for the reason that morality and immorality cannot really be explained from earthly conditions. Whoever attempts such explanations will always go wrong. For by being moral or immoral, man already places himself psychically in a relationship to a world that lies in the supersensible. And we may say that it is only when anthroposophical spiritual science, in the manner indicated, inclines man's mind to the contemplation of this relationship to a supersensible world that it actually makes it possible to gain a basis for considering the moral. For the way of looking at the world, which only wants to admit a knowledge of nature, the moral can only exist in illusory images, in illusions, which arise from the natural processes that are also supposed to take place in man.

Suppose it were really the case that at the beginning of earthly existence there stood the Kant-Laplacean world fog with its mechanical forces and mechanical laws, and suppose that from these swirling masses of fog the realms of earthly existence had gradually emerged through indifferent, neutral natural laws, and that finally man had risen out of all this, then his moral impulses would be dreams. For all that which he calls moral would pass away if the earth were again to reach the end according to mechanical laws and disappear in heat death. A justification of moral life can never follow from such a view, if one honestly wants to admit the ultimate consequences of this world view. A justification of the moral results solely from the fact that one points out, as anthroposophical spiritual science does, those areas of existence where the moral has such a reality as the natural here in the life between birth and death. Just as plants grow and blossom here, so certain activities develop when the human being is among the gods between death and a new birth. And these activities are the moral in reality, are the reality of the moral. This moral has reality there, while on earth there is only a reflection of this reality. But man belongs to both worlds. Therefore, if he understands this correctly in the spiritual-scientific sense, the moral world has just such a reality for him, only it can never be recognized out of physical existence.

But you have thereby given the one necessity why it is necessary for man to acquire spiritual science. Without this spiritual science man could not be honest with his knowledge, for he could not recognize the reality of the moral world, because he does not want to explore the area to which the reality of the moral world belongs. This is something tremendously significant, to understand such a sentence in the right way.

But there is another aspect I would like to emphasize to you today, namely the extent to which the knowledge that can be acquired through spiritual science is a necessity for man. Here, too, we will have to look at the realities of another world. Even if one only ascends to imaginative knowledge, to that knowledge which thus allows one to live in the etheric world instead of the physical world, so that one perceives the activities in the ether instead of the physical things - for they are activities - even if one ascends to this, space as it is here on earth no longer applies to one. Three-dimensional space disappears. There is no point in talking about three-dimensional space, because we are essentially living in time. That is why I have described the etheric body as a time organism in other ways of looking at it. Just as we have here in the spatial organism, for example, the head and, let us say, the leg, and just as you feel it in the head when you prick or cut your leg, just as one organ is spatially connected with the other for this spatial body, so all these details are connected in the temporal body, which consists in events, in events of everything that lies deeper at the basis of our human being between birth and death.

Remember what I have said in lectures on pedagogy, for example: If one has learned to venerate in a certain period of childhood, this power of veneration is transformed in later life into a certain blessing mildness that one can have for other people, whereas the person who has never had the opportunity to venerate properly in childhood cannot develop this blessing mildness in later life. - Just as the foot or the leg is connected with the head in the spatial organism, so youth is connected with age, and I could also say that age is connected with youth. For only for the outer physical perception does the world flow to one side, from the past to the future. For the higher vision there is also the reverse flow: from the future to the past. We enter this stream, as I have described, after death, wandering backwards. Everything is also connected in this organism of time. Just as you cannot remove certain organs from the space organism, as they have to be there for the whole organism to be in order, just as you cannot, for example, remove a large part of your face without removing the whole organism. You cannot remove a large part of your face without destroying the organism, just as you cannot remove anything from what flows away in time in the human being.

Now you think that there would be a completely different growth in the space organism at the place where you have your eyes, so that not eyes would arise, but somehow tumors. Then you would not be able to see. Just as the eyes are in a certain place on the space organism, so in the time organism - and by that I mean not only the time organism between birth and death, but the time organism that goes beyond all deaths and all births in man - is incorporated that which is between birth and death and develops in this existence between birth and death through concepts, through ideas, through conceptions of a spiritual world. And what develops there are the eyes for the supersensible existence. If you do not develop any knowledge of the supersensible world between birth and death, this means that your existence in the supersensible world between death and a new birth is blinded, just as the lack of eyes in the spatial organism means that you are blinded. One passes through death, even if one does not develop any knowledge of the supersensible world here on earth, but one enters a world in which one sees nothing, but in which one can only feel one's way along.

This is the tremendous pain which, I would like to say, appears as the antithesis of the materialistic age for those who today really look into initiation science. He sees how people on earth are falling into materialism. But he also knows what this lapse into materialism means for spiritual existence, he knows that it is a tearing out of the eyes, that it means that people can only grope in the existence that awaits them after death. In older times of human development, when there was an instinctive knowledge of the supersensible world, people passed through the gate of death by being able to see. This old instinctive supersensible knowledge has been extinguished. Today, spiritual knowledge must be consciously acquired, mind you: spiritual knowledge, not clairvoyance! I have always emphasized: clairvoyance can also be acquired, but that is not what matters, but the understanding of what comes about through clairvoyant research, through ordinary common sense, because it can be understood through it.

Whoever claims that ordinary knowledge through common sense does not give him the eye for the supersensible existence, that he needs clairvoyance for this - clairvoyance is needed to investigate things, but it is not needed to acquire the ability to see in the supersensible world after death - whoever claims this may only immediately claim that one cannot think if the eyes do not think. As little as the eyes need to think here in physical life, so little does the knowledge of the supersensible worlds need clairvoyance for that which I have indicated today. There would of course be no supersensible knowledge on earth if there were not clairvoyance, but even the clairvoyant must transform into ordinary comprehension what he sees in the supersensible. No matter how clairvoyant a man might be here on earth, no matter how clearly he might see into the spiritual world - if he were too comfortable to transform what he sees in the spiritual world into ordinary, logically comprehensible ideas, he would still be blinded in the spiritual world after death.

This, I say, is the great pain for those who look into the initiatory science of the present, that they must say to themselves: Materialism blinds people when they pass through the gate of death. - And here again we have something from which we can see that it has a significance for reality, for the whole existence of the world, whether man today leans towards supersensible knowledge or not. The time has just come when he should do so. It is in the progress of mankind to ascend to supersensible knowledge today.