Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

The Inner Nature of Music and the Experience of Tone
GA 283

7 March 1923, Stuttgart

The Experience of Tone I

What we can discuss in these two days will naturally be fragmentary, and I shall address myself chiefly to the needs of teachers. My subject will neither deal with the aesthetics of music nor is it intended for those who wish their enjoyment of art impaired by being told something that is supposed to add to a comprehension of this enjoyment. I would have to speak differently concerning both the aesthetics of music—as conceived from today's standpoint—and the mere enjoyment of it. Now I wish to create a general foundation, and tomorrow I shall go into a few things that can be of significance in preparing such a general foundation in musical instruction. We can go into more detail another time.

It must be pointed out that all the concepts used in other areas of life fail the moment one is obliged to speak about the musical element. It is hardly possible to discuss the musical element in the concepts to which one is accustomed in ordinary life. The reason is simply that the musical element really does not exist in the physical world. It must first be created in the given physical world. This caused people like Goethe to consider the musical element as a kind of ideal of all forms of art. Hence, Goethe said that music is entirely form and substance and requires no other content save that within its own element. This is also why, in the age when intellectualism valiantly struggled for an understanding of music, the strange distinction was made between the content of music and the subject of an art form. Hanslick in particular made this distinction in his book, The Beautiful in Music, which emerged out of the above struggle.1Edward von Hanslick (1825–1904), music critic and author in Vienna. His book, The Beautiful in Music (trans. Gustav Cohen, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merril, 1957), first appeared in 1954. Naturally, Hanslick ascribes a content to music, though in a one-sided manner, but he denies music a subject. Indeed, music does not have a subject that exists in the outer physical world such as is the case with painting. Even in our age, in which intellectualism wishes to tackle everything, there is a feeling that intellectualism cannot reach the musical element, because it can deal only with something for which there are outer subjects. This explains the strange fact that nowhere in the well-meant instruction of music appreciation does tone physiology (acoustics) have anything to say about the musical element. It is widely admitted that there is a tone physiology only for sounds; there is none for tones. With the means customary today one cannot grasp the element of music. If one does begin to speak about the musical element, it is thus necessary to avoid the ordinary concepts that otherwise we use to grasp our world.

Perhaps the best way to approach what we wish to arrive at in these lectures would be to take present history as our starting point. If we compare our age with former times, we find our age characterized in a specific way in relation to the musical element. One can say that our age occupies a position between two musical feelings [Empfindungen]; one such feeling it already has, the other not yet. The feeling that our age has attained, at least to a considerable degree, is the feeling for the interval of the third. In history we can easily trace how the transition from the feeling for the fifth to the third came about in the world of musical feeling. The feeling for the third is something new. The other feeling that will come about but as yet does not exist in our age is the feeling for the octave. A true feeling for the octave actually has not yet developed in humanity. You will experience the difference that exists in comparison to feelings for tone up to the seventh. While the seventh is still felt in relation to the prime, an entirely different experience arises as soon as the octave appears. One cannot actually distinguish it any longer from the prime; it merges with the prime. In any case, the difference that exists for a fifth or a third is absent for an octave. Of course, we do have a feeling for the octave, but this is not yet the feeling that will be developed in time; in the future the feeling for the octave will be something completely different and will one day be able to deepen the musical experience tremendously. Every time the octave appears in a musical composition, man will have a feeling that I can only describe with the words, “I have found my ‘I’ anew; I am uplifted in my humanity by the feeling for the octave.” The particular words I use here are not important; what is important is the feeling that is evoked.

These things can be understood, understood with feeling, only if one becomes clear that the musical experience at first does not have the relationship to the ear that is normally assumed. The musical experience involves the whole human being, and the ear's function in musical experience is completely different from what is normally assumed. Nothing is more incorrect than the simple statement, “I hear the tone or I hear a melody with my ear.” That is completely wrong ” a tone, a melody, or a harmony actually is experienced with the whole human being. This experience reaches our consciousness through the ear in quite a strange way. As you know, the tones we ordinarily take into consideration have as their medium the air. Even if an instrument other than a wind instrument is used, the element in which tone lives is still in the air. What we experience in tone, however, no longer has anything to do with the air. The ear is the organ that first separates the air element from tone before our experience of tone. In experiencing tone as such, we thus actually feel a resonance, a reflection. The ear really hurls the airborne tone back into the inner being of man in such a way that it separates out the air element; then, in that we hear it, the tone lives in the ether element. It is the ear's task—if I may express it in this way—actually to overcome the tone's resounding in the air and to hurl the pure etheric experience of tone back into our inner being. The ear is a reflecting apparatus for the sensation of tone.

Now we must understand the entire tone experience in man more deeply. I must repeat that all concepts come into confusion in encountering the tone experience. We say so lightly that man is a threefold being: nerve-sense man, rhythmic man, and metabolic-limb man. For all other conditions, this is as true as can be. For the tone experience, however, for the musical experience, it is not quite correct. Musical experience does not actually exist in the same sense as sense experience does for the other senses. The sense experience in relation to musical experience is essentially much more introspective than other experiences, because for musical experience the ear is only a reflecting organ; the ear does not actually bring man into connection with the outer world in the same way as does the eye, for example. The eye brings man into connection with all visible forms of the outer world, even artistic forms. The eye is important to a painter, not merely to someone who looks at nature. The ear is important to the musician only in so far as it is in the position of experiencing, without having a relationship to the outer world such as the eye has, for instance. For the musical element, the ear is of importance merely as a reflecting apparatus. We must actually say that regarding the musical experience, we must view the human being first of all as nerve man, because the ear is not important as a direct sense organ but instead as transmitter to man's inner being. The ear is not a link to the outer world—the perception of instrumental music is a quite complicated process about which we shall speak later—and is of no immediate importance as a sense organ but only as a reflecting organ.

Contributing further, what is important in the musical experience is that which is related to man's limb system, through which the element of music can pass into that of dance. Man's metabolic system, however, is not as important here as it is otherwise. In speaking of the musical experience, therefore, we discover a shifting of man's three-fold organization and find that we must say: nerve man, rhythmic man, limb man (not metabolic-limb man). Some perceptions are ruled out as accompanying factors. They are there because man is a sense being, and his ear also has significance as a sense organ, but not the significance we must ascribe to it in other conditions of the world. The metabolism is also an accompanying factor and does not exist in the same way as elsewhere. Metabolic phenomena appear, but they have no significance. Everything that lives in the limbs as potential for movement, however, has tremendous significance for the musical experience, since dance movements are linked with the musical experience. A great portion of the musical experience consists of one's having to restrain oneself from making movements along with the music. This points out to us that the musical experience is really an experience of the whole human being.

Why is it that man today has an experience of the third? Why is he only on the way to acquiring an experience of the octave? The reason is that in human evolution all musical experience first leads back to the ancient Atlantean time—unless we wish to go back further, which serves no purpose here. The experience of the seventh was the essential musical experience of the ancient Atlantean age. If you could go back into the Atlantean age, you would find that the music of that time, which had little similarity to today's music, was arranged according to continuing sevenths; even the fifth was unknown. This musical experience, which was based on an experience of the seventh through the full range of octaves, always consisted of man feeling completely transported [entrückt]. He felt free of his earthbound existence and transported into another world in this experience of the seventh. At that time he could just as well have said, “I experience music,” as “I feel myself in the spiritual world.” This was the predominant experience of the seventh. Up into the post-Atlantean age, this continued to play a great role, until it began to have an unpleasant effect. As the human being wished to incarnate more deeply into this physical body and take possession of it, the experience of the seventh became faintly painful. Man began to find the experience of the fifth more pleasant, and for a long time a scale composed according to our standards would have consisted of d, e, g, a, b, and again d, and e. There was no f and no c. For the early post-Atlantean epochs, the feeling for f and c is missing; instead, the fifths throughout the tonal range of different octaves were experienced.

In the course of time, the fifths began to be the pleasurable experience. All musical forms, however, in which the third and what we call c today are excluded, were permeated with a measure of this transporting quality. Such music made a person feel as if he were carried into a different element. In the music of the fifths [Quintenmusik], a human being felt lifted out of himself. The transition to the experience of the third actually can be traced back into the fourth post-Atlantean epoch, in which experiences of the fifth still predominated. (To this day, experiences of the fifth are contained in native Chinese music.) This transition to the experience of the third signifies at the same time that man feels music in relation to his own physical organization. For the first time, man feels that he is an earthly being when he plays music. Formerly, when he experienced fifths, he would have been inclined to say, “The angel in my being is beginning to play music. The muse in me speaks.” “I sing” was not the appropriate expression. It became possible to say this only when the experience of the third emerged, making the whole musical feeling an inward experience; the human being then felt that he himself was singing.

In the age when the fifths predominated, it was impossible to color music in a subjective direction. Subjectivity only came into play in that the subjective felt transported, lifted into objectivity. Not until man could experience the third did the subjective element feel that it rested within itself. Man began to relate the feeling for his destiny and ordinary life to the musical element.

Something now began to have meaning that would have had none in the ages of the experience of the fifth, namely major and minor keys. One could not even have spoken then of a major key. Major and minor keys, this strange bond between music and human subjectivity, the actual inner life of feeling—in so far as this life of feeling is bound to the earthly corporeality—come into being only in the course of the fourth post-Atlantean epoch and are related to the experience of the third. The difference between major and minor keys appears; the subjective soul element relates itself to the musical element. Man can color the musical element in various ways. He is in himself, then outside himself; his soul swings back and forth between self-awareness and self-surrender. Only now is the musical element drawn into the human being in a corresponding way. One thus can say that the experience of the third begins during the fourth post-Atlantean epoch and with it the ability to express major and minor moods in music. Basically, we ourselves are still involved in this process. Only an understanding of the whole human being—one that must reach beyond ordinary concepts—can illustrate how we are involved in this process.

One naturally gets into the habit of speaking in general concepts even in anthroposophy. One thus says that man consists of physical body, etheric body, astral body, and “I.” One has to put it like that to begin with in order to describe the human being in stages, but actually the matter is more complicated than one thinks. When we look at the embryonic development of earthly man, we find that, preceding this descent from the spiritual world to the physical world, the human “I” descends spiritually to the astral and etheric. In penetrating the astral and etheric, the “I” is then able to take hold of the physical embryo, giving rise to the forces of growth and so on. Though physical forces take hold of the human embryo, they in turn have been affected by the descent of the “I” through the astral and etheric into the physical. In the fully developed human being living in the physical world, the “I” works spiritually, through the eye, for example, directly upon the physical, at first bypassing the astral and etheric. Later, from within the human organism, the “I” connects itself again with the astral and etheric. We bring into ourselves the etheric and astral only from within out. We thus can say that the “I” lives in us in a twofold way. First, inasmuch as we have become human beings on earth, the “I” lives in us by having descended into the physical world in the first place. The “I” then builds up from the physical with the inclusion of the astral and etheric. Secondly, when we are adults, the “I” dwells in us by virtue of gaining influence over us through the senses or by taking hold of our astral nature. There it gains influence over our breath to the exclusion of the actual “I” sphere of the head, where the physical body becomes the organ of the “I.” Only in the movements of our limbs—if we move our limbs today—do we still have in us the same activity of nature or the world that we had within us as embryos. Everything else is added. The same activity that worked in you when you were an embryo is active today when you walk or dance. All other activities, especially the activity of the head, came about later as the downward streams of development were eliminated.

Now the musical experience actually penetrates the whole human being. The cause for this is the spiritual element that descended the farthest and took hold of the as yet formless earthly being in, I would like to say, an other-than-human manner. It then laid the foundation for embryonic development and today expresses itself in our movements and gestures. This element that dwells thus in man is at the same time the basis of the lower tones of an octave, namely c, c-sharp, d and d-sharp. Now, disorder comes in—as you can see on the piano—because the matter reaches the etheric. Everything in man's limb system—in other words, his most physical component—is engaged with the lowest tones of each and every octave. Beginning with e, the vibrating of the etheric body plays an essential role. This continues to f, f-sharp, and g. Beyond this point, the vibrations of the astral body enter in. Now we reach a climactic stage. Beginning with c and c-sharp, when we reach the seventh we come to a region where we actually must stand still. The experience comes to a half, and we need a completely new element.

By the beginning form the first tone of the octave, we have begun from the inner “I,” the physical, living, inner “I”—if I may express it in this way—and we have ascended through the etheric and astral bodies to the seventh. We must now pass over to the directly experienced “I,” in that we arrive at the next higher octave. We must say, as it were: man actually lives in us in all seven tones, but we do not know it. He pushes against us in c and c-sharp. Pushing upward from there, in f and f-sharp, he shakes up our etheric and astral bodies. The etheric body vibrates and pushes up to the astral body—the origin of the vibration being below in the etheric body—and we arrive at the astral experience in the tones up to the seventh. We do not know it fully, however, we know it only through feeling. Finally, the feeling for the octave brings us to find our own self on a higher level. The third guides us to our inner being; the octave leads us to have, to feel, our own self once more. You must take all these concepts that I use only as substitutes and in each case resort to feelings. Then you will be able to see how the musical experience really strives to lead man back to what he lost in primeval times. In primeval times, when the experience of the seventh existed—and therefore, in fact, the experience of the entire scale—man felt that he was a unified being standing on earth; at that time when he heard the seventh, he also experienced himself outside his body. He therefore felt himself in the world. Music was for him the possibility of feeling himself in the world. The human being could receive religious instruction by being taught the music of that time. He could readily understand that through music man is not only an earthly being but also a transported being. In the course of time, this experience increasingly intensified. The experience of the fifth arose, and during this time man still felt united with what lived in his breath. He said to himself—though he did not say it, he felt it; in order to express it, we must word it like that—“I breath in, I breath out. During a nightmare I am especially aware of the experience of breath due to the change in my breathing. The musical element, however, does not live in me at all; it lives in inhalation and exhalation.” Man felt always as if he were leaving and returning to himself in the musical experience. The fifth comprised both inhalation and exhalation; the seventh comprised only exhalation. The third enabled man to experience the continuation of the breathing process within. Based on all this, you find a specific explanation for the advancement from the pure singing-with-accompaniment that existed in ancient times of human evolution to independent singing. Originally, singing was always produced along with some outer tone, an outer tone structure. [Tongebilde]. Emancipated singing actually came about later; emancipated instrumental music is connected with that. One can now say that in the musical experience man experienced himself as being at one with the world. He experienced himself neither within nor outside himself. He would have been incapable of hearing an instrument alone; in the very earliest time he could not have heard one isolated tone. It would have appeared to him like a lone ghost wandering around. He could only experience a tone composed of outer, objective elements and inner, subjective ones. Hence, the musical experience was divided into these two, the objective and the subjective.

This whole experience naturally penetrates today into everything musical. On the one hand, music occupies a special position in the world, because, as yet, man cannot find the link to the world in the musical experience. This link to the world will be discovered one day when the experience of the octave comes into being in the manner previously outlined. Then, the musical experience will become for man proof of the existence of god, because he will experience the “I” twice: once as physical, inner “I,” the second time as spiritual, outer “I.” When octaves are employed in the same manner as seventh, fifths, and thirds—today's use of octaves does not approach this yet—it will become a new form of proving the existence of God. That is what the experience of the octave will be. People will say to themselves, “When I first experience my ‘I’ as it is on earth, in the prime, and then experience it a second time the way it is in spirit, then this is inner proof of God's existence.” This is a different kind of proof, however, from that of the ancient Atlantean, which he gained through his experience with the seventh. Then, all music was evidence of God's existence, but it was in no way proof of man's existence. The great spirit took hold of the human being and filled him inwardly the moment he participated in music. The great progress made by humanity in the musical element is that the human being is not just possessed by God but takes hold of his own self as well, that man feels the musical scale as himself, but himself as existing in both worlds. You can imagine the tremendous profundity of which the musical element will be capable in the future. Not only will it offer man what he can experience in our ordinary musical compositions today, which have come a long way indeed, but man will be able to experience how, while listening to a musical composition, he becomes a totally different person. He will feel changed, and yet again he will feel returned to himself. The further cultivation of the musical element consists of this feeling of a widely diverse human potential. We thus can say that f has already joined the five old tones, d, e, g, a, and b, to the greatest possible extent, but not yet the actual c. This must still be explored in its entire significance for human feeling.

All this is extraordinarily important when one is faced with the task of guiding the evolution of the human being regarding the musical element. You see, up to about the age of nine, the child does not yet possess a proper grasp of major and minor moods, though one can approach the child with them. When entering school, the child can experience major and minor moods in preparation for what is to come later, but the child has neither one nor the other. Though it is not readily admitted, the child essentially dwells in moods of fifths. Naturally, one can resort in school to examples already containing thirds, but if one really wishes to reach the child, musical appreciation must be based on the appreciation of the fifths; this is what is important. One does the child a great kindness if one confronts it with major and minor musical moods as well as an appreciation for the whole third-complex sometime after the age of nine, when the child asks important questions of us. One of the most significant questions concerns the urge for living together with the major and minor third. This is something that appears between ages nine and ten and that should be specifically cultivated. As far as is possible within present-day limits of music, it is also necessary to try to promote appreciation of the octave at around age twelve. What must be offered the child in the way of music thus will be adapted once again to the various ages.

It is tremendously important to be clear that music fundamentally lives only inwardly in man, namely, in the etheric body; regarding the lowest tones of the scale, the physical body is naturally taken along too. The physical body, however, must push upward into the etheric body, which in turn pushes upon the astral body. The “I,” finally, can barely be touched.

While we always dwell within our brains with our crude and clumsy concepts regarding the rest of the world, we leave the musical element the instant we develop concepts about it. This is because the unfolding of concepts takes place on a level above that of the musical realm. We must leave music behind when we think, because tone begins to develop shades within itself—prosaic science would say that it exhibits a particular number of vibrations—and is no longer experienced as tone. When tone begins to develop shades within itself, the concept arises that becomes objectified in sound [im laut]. In the sound of speech, the concept really cancels out the tone, in so far as tone is sound, though not in so far as tone harmonizes with the sound, of course. Then, the actual musical experience reaches down only to the etheric body, and there it struggles. Certainly, the physical pushes upward into the lower tones. If, however, we were to go all the way down into the physical, the metabolism would be included in the musical experience, which would then cease to be a pure musical experience. In fact, this is attained in the contra-tones so as to make the musical experience somewhat more piquant, as it were. Music is driven slightly out of its own element in the contra-tones.2Contra-tones are the tones below contra-c: (see diagram)

Diagram 1

The actual musical experience that takes its course completely within—neither in the “I” nor in the physical body but in etheric and astral man—the inward-etheric body, i.e. down to the tones of the great octave.3The great octave refers to the tones between c3 and c2 below middle c. The contra-tones below only serve the purpose of allowing the outer world to beat, as it were, upon the musical element. The contra-tones appear when man strikes outward with the musical element and the outer world rejects it. This is where the musical element leaves the soul element and enters that of matter. When we descend to the contra-tones, our soul reaches down into the element of matter, and we experience how matter strives to become musically ensouled. This is what the position of contra-tones in music basically signifies.

All this leads us to say that only a truly irrational understanding—an understanding of the human being beyond the rational—will permit us to grasp the musical element in a feeling way and to acquaint the human being with it.

We shall continue in more detail tomorrow.

Das Tonerlebnis im Menschen I

Es wird natürlich nur etwas sehr Fragmentarisches sein, was wir in diesen zwei Tagen besprechen können, und ich werde im besonderen so sprechen, wie es gerade für den Lehrenden notwendig ist. Dasjenige, was ich sagen möchte, soll weder sein etwas Musikästhetisches, wie man das oftmals nennt, noch soll es etwas sein, was derjenige wünscht, möchte ich sagen, der eine Neigung hat, seinen Kunstgenuß dadurch beeinträchtigen zu lassen, daß man ihm irgend etwas sagt, was zum Verständnis dieses Kunstgenusses beiträgt. Nach beiden Richtungen hin, sowohl nach der Seite der Musikästhetik, wie man sie heute auffaßt, und nach der Seite des bloß Genießenden müßte anders gesprochen werden. Ich will aber heute eine allgemeine Grundlage gewinnen und morgen einiges ausführen, das dann zur Vorbereitung solcher allgemeiner Grundlagen eben in der Pflege des musikalischen Unterrichtes eine Bedeutung haben kann. Ein anderes Mal können diese Dinge dann weiter ausgeführt werden.

In bezug auf das Musikalische muß eigentlich bemerkt werden, daß, sobald man sich gedrungen fühlt, über dasselbe zu sprechen, eigentlich sofort alle sonst im Leben angewendeten Begriffe in die Brüche gehen. Man kann kaum über das Musikalische mit den Begriffen sprechen, die man gewöhnt ist im übrigen Leben anzuwenden. Man kann das aus dem einfachen Grunde nicht, weil das Musikalische eigentlich in der uns gegebenen physischen Welt nicht vorhanden ist. Es muß erst in diese gegebene physische Welt hineingeschaffen werden. Das bewirkte dann, daß Leute wie Goethe das Musikalische als eine Art Ideal alles Künstlerischen empfanden, daß Goethe sagen konnte: Die Musik ist ganz Form und Gehalt und beansprucht nicht irgendeinen sonstigen Inhalt als denjenigen, der ihr innerhalb ihres eigenen Elementes gegeben ist. — Das hat ja auch bewirkt, daß in der Zeit, in welcher der Intellektualismus mit dem Verständnisse der Musik so außerordentlich gerungen hat — aus welchem Ringen dann das Büchlein «Vom Musikalisch-Schönen» von Hanslick hervorgegangen ist -, daß in der Zeit die merkwürdige Unterscheidung gemacht worden ist gerade von Hanslick zwischen dem Inhalte der Musik und dem Gegenstande eines Künstlerischen. Einen Inhalt gibt natürlich auch Hanslick, wenn er auch dies in sehr einseitiger Weise tut, der Musik; aber einen Gegenstand spricht er ihr ab. Einen solchen Gegenstand, wie ihn die Malerei hat, der in der äußeren physischen Welt vorhanden ist, hat ja die Musik nicht. Und das weist schon darauf hin, daß man es auch in unserem Zeitalter, wo der Intellektualismus an alles heran wollte, empfindet: an das Musikalische kann eigentlich der Intellektualismus nicht heran. Denn er kann nur an dasjenige heran, wofür es äußere Gegenstände gibt. Daher auch dieses Eigentümliche, das Sie überall in allerlei gutgemeinten Anleitungen für ein Musikverständnis finden werden, daß eigentlich die Tonphysiologie nichts zu sagen weiß über das Musikalische. Das ist ja ein überall verbreitetes Eingeständnis: Es gibt eine Tonphysiologie nur für Klänge, es gibt keine Tonphysiologie für Töne. Man kann eigentlich mit den heutigen gebräuchlichen Mitteln das Musikalische nicht begreifen. Und daher ist es auch notwendig, daß, wenn man beginnt über das Musikalische zu sprechen, man nicht appelliert an die gewöhnlichen Begriffe, die sonst unsere Welt begreifen.

Man wird vielleicht dem, worauf wir in diesen zwei Tagen kommen wollen, am besten nahekommen, wenn man einen bestimmten, ich möchte sagen gegenwartshistorischen Ausgangspunkt nimmt. Wenn wir unser Zeitalter vergleichen mit früheren Zeitaltern, so finden wir dieses unser Zeitalter in einer ganz bestimmten Weise charakterisiert in bezug auf das Musikalische. Man kann sagen: Dieses unser Zeitalter steht mitten zwischen zwei musikalischen Empfindungen darinnen. Die eine Empfindung hat es schon, die andere hat es noch nicht. Die eine Empfindung, die unser Zeitalter sich wenigstens bis zu einem gewissen hohen Grade errungen hat, ist die Terzenempfindung. Wir können in der Geschichte sehr gut verfolgen, wie der Übergang gefunden worden ist in der musikalischen Empfindungswelt von der Quintenempfindung zu der Terzenempfindung. Die Terzenempfindung ist etwas Neueres. Dagegen gibt es in unserem Zeitalter noch nicht dasjenige, was es auch einmal geben wird: die Oktavempfindung. Eine wirkliche Oktavempfindung ist eigentlich in der Menschheit noch nicht ausgebildet. Sie werden den Unterschied fühlen, der da besteht im Vergleich zum Empfinden der Töne bis zu der Septime. Während die Septime noch in bezug auf die Prim empfunden wird, so tritt dann ein ganz anderes Erleben ein, sobald die Oktave herankommt. Man kann sie eigentlich nicht mehr unterscheiden von der Prim, sie fällt mit der Prim zusammen. Jedenfalls, der Unterschied, der für eine Quinte oder Terz vorhanden ist, ist für eine Oktave nicht da. Gewiß, wir haben doch eine Empfindung dafür. Aber das ist noch nicht die Empfindung, die sich einmal ausbilden wird, und die veranlagt ist. Die Oktavempfindung wird einmal etwas ganz anderes sein. Die Oktavempfindung wird einmal ungeheuer das musikalische Erleben vertiefen können. Das wird so sein, daß bei jedem Geltendmachen des Oktavischen in einem musikalischen Kunstwerk der Mensch geradezu eine Empfindung haben wird, die ich nur so umschreiben kann: Ich habe mein Ich neuerdings gefunden, ich bin in meiner Menschheit durch die Oktavempfindung gehoben. Nicht, was ieh hier mit Worten ausspreche, kommt in Betracht, sondern es kommt dasjenige in Betracht, was empfunden werden kann.

Nun, verstehen, empfindend verstehen kann man diese Dinge eigentlich nur, wenn man sich darüber klar wird, daß das musikalische Erlebnis zunächst nicht jene Beziehung zum Ohr hat, die man gewöhnlich annimmt. Das musikalische Erlebnis betrifft nämlich den ganzen Menschen, und das Ohr hat eine ganz andere Funktion im musikalischen Erlebnis, als man gewöhnlich annimmt. Nichts ist falscher, als einfach zu sagen: Ich höre den Ton, oder ich höre eine Melodie mit dem Ohr. — Das ist ganz falsch. Der Ton oder eine Melodie oder irgendeine Harmonie wird eigentlich mit dem ganzen Menschen erlebt. Und dieses Erlebnis kommt mit dem Ohr auf eine ganz eigentümliche Weise zum Bewußtsein. Nicht wahr, die Töne, mit denen wir gewöhnlich rechnen, die haben ja zu ihrem Medium die Luft. Auch wenn wir irgendein anderes Instrument verwenden als gerade ein Blasinstrument, so ist doch dasjenige, als Element, worin der Ton lebt, die Luft. Aber das, was wir im Ton erleben, hat nämlich gar nichts mehr zu tun mit der Luft. Und die Sache ist diese, daß das Ohr dasjenige Organ ist, welches erst vor einem Tonerlebnis das Luftartige vom Ton absondert, so daß wir den Ton, indem wir ihn erleben als solchen, eigentlich empfangen als Resonanz, als Reflexion. Das Ohr ist eigentlich dasjenige Organ, das uns den in der Luft lebenden Ton ins Innere unseres Menschen zurückwirft, aber so, daß das Luftelement abgesondert ist, und dann der Ton, indem wir ihn hören, im Ätherelemente lebt. Also das Ohr ist eigentlich dazu da, um, wenn ich mich so ausdrücken darf, das Tönen des Tones in der Luft zu überwinden und uns das reine Äthererlebnis des Tones ins Innere zurückzuwerfen. Es ist ein Reflexionsapparat für das Tonempfinden.

Nun handelt es sich darum, tiefer zu verstehen, wie das ganze Tonerlebnis im Menschen geartet ist. Es ist so geartet, ich muß es noch einmal sagen, daß eigentlich dem Tonerlebnis gegenüber alle Begriffe in Verwirrung kommen. Nicht wahr, wir reden so hin: Der Mensch ist ein dreigliedriges Wesen, Nerven-Sinnesmensch, rhythmischer Mensch, Gliedmaßen-Stoffwechselmensch. — Ja, das ist für alle übrigen Verhältnisse eigentlich so wahr als irgend möglich. Aber für das Tonerlebnis, für das musikalische Erlebnis ist es nämlich nicht ganz richtig. Für das musikalische Erlebnis ist eigentlich nicht in demselben Sinne das Sinneserlebnis vorhanden wie für die anderen Erlebnisse. Das Sinneserlebnis ist beim musikalischen Erlebnis schon ein wesentlich verinnerlichteres als für die anderen Erlebnisse, weil für das musikalische Erlebnis das Ohr eigentlich nur Reflexionsorgan ist, das Ohr eigentlich nicht in derselben Weise den Menschen mit der Außenwelt in Zusammenhang bringt wie zum Beispiel das Auge. Das Auge bringt den Menschen in Zusammenhang mit der Außenwelt für alle Formen des Sehbaren, auch für die künstlerischen Formen des Sehbaren. Das Auge kommt auch für den Maler in Betracht, nicht bloß für den die Natur Schauenden. Das Ohr kommt für den Musiker nur insofern in Betracht, als es in der Lage ist, zu erleben, ohne mit der Außenwelt in solcher Verbindung zu stehen wie zum Beispiel das Auge. Das Ohr kommt für das Musikalische dadurch in Betracht, daß es lediglich ein Reflexionsapparat ist. So daß wir eigentlich sagen müssen: Für das musikalische Erlebnis müssen wir den Menschen betrachten zunächst als Nervenmenschen. Denn es kommt nicht das Ohr als unmittelbares Sinnesorgan in Betracht, sondern nur als Vermittler nach innen, nicht als Verbinder mit der Außenwelt — das Wahrnehmen der Instrumentalmusik ist ein sehr komplizierter Vorgang, über den werden wir noch zu sprechen haben -, aber als Sinnesorgan kommt das Ohr nicht unmittelbar in Betracht, sondern als Reflexionsorgan.

Und wiederum, wenn wir weitergehen, so kommt für das musikalische Erleben sehr wohl dasjenige in Betracht, was mit den Gliedmaßen des Menschen zusammenhängt, daher auch das Musikalische in das Tanzartige übergehen kann. Aber nicht in derselben Weise wie für die übrige Welt kommt dabei der Stoffwechselmensch in Betracht, so daß wir eigentlich schon die Gliederung des Menschen verschoben haben für den Menschen, wenn wir vom musikalischen Erlebnis sprechen.

Für das musikalische Erleben müssen wir sagen: Nervenmensch, rhythmischer Mensch, Gliedmaßenmensch. Die Sinneswahrnehmungen schalten als Begleiterscheinungen aus. Sie sind da, weil der Mensch Sinneswesen ist, und sein Ohr hat auch als Sinnesorgan eine Bedeutung, aber es hat nicht die Bedeutung, die wir ihm für andere Verhältnisse der Welt zuschreiben müssen. Der Stoffwechsel ist nicht in derselben Weise vorhanden, er ist Begleiterscheinung; es treten Stoffwechselerscheinungen auf, aber sie haben gar keine Bedeutung. Dagegen hat eine Bedeutung alles dasjenige, was als Bewegungsmöglichkeit in den Gliedmaßen lebt. Das hat eine ungeheuer große Bedeutung für das musikalische Erleben, weil wir mit dem musikalischen Erlebnis die Tanzbewegungen verknüpfen. Und ein gutes Stück des musikalischen Erlebens beruht darauf, daß man an sich halten muß, die Bewegungen zurückhalten muß. Das weist Sie aber darauf hin, daß eigentlich das musikalische Erlebnis ein Erlebnis des ganzen Menschen ist.

Nun, worauf beruht es, daß der Mensch in der Gegenwart ein Terzenerlebnis hat? Worauf beruht es, daß er erst auf dem Wege ist, ein eigentliches Oktavenerlebnis zu bekommen? Das beruht darauf, daß alles musikalische Erleben in der Menschenentwickelung eigentlich zunächst uns zurückführt — sagen wir, wenn wir nicht weiter zurückgehen wollen, und das hat ja keinen Zweck; hier kann ich das aussprechen - in die altatlantische Zeit. In der altatlantischen Zeit war das ganz wesentliche musikalische Erlebnis das Septimenerleben. Wenn Sie in die altatlantische Zeit zurückgehen würden, so würden Sie finden, daß man dort - es schaut sehr wenig dem, was heute Musik ist, ähnlich — eigentlich alles abgestimmt hat in fortlaufenden Septimen. Man kannte noch nicht einmal Quinten. Und das Septimenerlebnis bestand eigentlich darin, daß man sich in diesem ganz auf dem Septimenerleben, durch die Oktaven hindurch auf dem Septimenerlebnis aufgebauten Musik-Erleben immer vollständig entrückt fühlte. Der Mensch fühlte sich in diesem Septimenerleben aus seiner Erdengebundenheit heraus. Er fühlte sich sofort in einer anderen Welt. Und der Mensch einer damaligen Zeit hätte ebensogut sagen können: Ich erlebe Musik -, wie er hätte sagen können: Ich fühle mich in der geistigen Welt. -— Das war das präponderierende Septimenerlebnis. Das setzte sich sogar noch in die nachatlantische Zeit herein fort und spielte eine große Rolle, bis es anfing, unsympathisch empfunden zu werden. In demselben Maße, in dem der Mensch in seinen physischen Leib hereinrücken wollte, von seinem physischen Leibe Besitz ergreifen wollte, fing das Septimenerleben an, schmerzhaft empfunden zu werden, leise schmerzhaft empfunden zu werden. Und der Mensch fing an, das größere Wohlgefallen an dem Quintenerlebnis zu bekommen, so daß eigentlich eine Skala, nach unserer Folge aufgebaut, dazumal gewesen wäre, durch lange Zeiten hindurch, in der nachatlantischen Zeit: d, e, g, a, h und wiederum d, e. Kein f und kein c. Also die f-Empfindung und die c-Empfindung müssen wir uns fortdenken, wenn wir in die ersten nachatlantischen Zeiten gehen. Dagegen wurden durch die verschiedenen Oktaven hindurch die Quinten erlebt.

Die Quinten fingen also an, im Laufe der Zeit die angenehme, die wohlgefällige musikalische Empfindung zu werden. Aber alles Musikalische, das mit Ausschluß der Terz und mit Ausschluß dessen, was wir heute c nennen, arbeitet, alles solche musikalische Erleben war mit einem Grad von Entrücktheit durchdrungen. Es war durchaus etwas, das verursachte, daß man das Musikalische wie ein Hineinversetztsein in ein anderes Element empfand. Man fühlte sich noch immer als aus sich herausgehoben in der Quintenmusik, als aus sich herausgehoben fühlte man sich. Und der Übergang zum Terzenerlebnis, das eigentlich zu verfolgen ist bis in den vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraum hinein — da ist das Terzenerleben noch nicht vollständig da, es sind eigentlich Quintenerlebnisse da; die Chinesen haben es heute noch, das Quintenerleben -, dieser Übergang zum Terzenerlebnis bedeutet zu gleicher Zeit dieses, daß der Mensch Musik mit seiner eigenen physischen Organisation in Verbindung fühlt, daß er sozusagen zuerst dadurch, daß er Terzen erleben kann, sich als irdischer Mensch als Musiker fühlt. Vorher, bei dem Quintenerleben, hat er eher gesagt: Der Engel in mir fängt an, Musiker zu werden. Die Muse spricht in mir. — «Ich singe», war nicht der richtige Ausdruck. «Ich singe», dieses zu sagen, dazu ist erst eine Möglichkeit da, wenn das Terzenerlebnis eintritt. Da kann man anfangen, sich selber als den Singenden zu fühlen. Denn das Terzenerlebnis verinnerlicht das ganze musikalische Empfinden. Daher gab es auch in der Quintenzeit durchaus keine Möglichkeit, das Musikalische zu kolorieren nach dem Anteil des Subjektiven. Der Anteil des Subjektiven war, bevor das Terzenerleben herankam, eigentlich immer der, daß das Subjektive sich entrückt fühlte, in die Objektivität hinein sich versetzt fühlte. Erst beim Terzenerlebnis kam es so, daß das Subjektive sich in sich selber ruhen fühlte und der Mensch anfing, seine eigene Schicksalsempfindung, die Schicksalsempfindung des gewöhnlichen Lebens mit dem Musikalischen zu verbinden. Daher beginnt dasjenige einen Sinn zu haben, was in der Quintenzeit überhaupt noch keinen Sinn hatte. Ein Dur und Moll hat in der Quintenzeit überhaupt noch keinen Sinn. Man konnte auch noch nicht von Dur sprechen. Das Dur und Moll, dieses eigentümliche Verbundensein der menschlichen Subjektivität, des eigentlichen inneren Empfindungslebens, soweit dieses Empfindungsleben an die irdische Leiblichkeit gebunden ist, das beginnt erst im Verlaufe des vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraumes und ist an das Terzenerlebnis gebunden. Da tritt der Unterschied hervor zwischen Dur und Moll. Da tritt die Verbindung des Subjektiv-Seelischen mit dem Musikalischen ein. Und der Mensch kann das Musikalische kolorieren, bekommt erst jetzt das Kolorit. Da ist er bald in sich, bald außer sich, die Seele schwingt hin und her zwischen Hingebung und Insich-Sein. Dadurch wird das Musikalische erst an den Menschen in entsprechender Weise herangezogen. So daß man sagen kann: Im Laufe des vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraumes beginnt das Terzenerlebnis, beginnt zu gleicher Zeit die Möglichkeit, Dur- und Mollstimmung im Musikalischen auszudrücken. — Darinnen stehen wir im Grunde genommen jetzt noch immer. Und wie wir darinnenstehen, das kann uns nur veranschaulichen ein Verständnis des ganzen Menschen, welches Verständnis aber auch über die gewöhnlichen Begriffe ganz hinausgehen muß,

Man gewöhnt sich natürlich an, auch Anthroposophie so zu betreiben, daß sie sich den gewöhnlichen Begriffen fügt, die man hat, und sagt dann: Der Mensch besteht aus physischem Leib, Ätherleib, Astralleib und Ich. - Man muß es ja auch zunächst sagen, weil man den Menschen Etappen geben muß. Aber es ist auch nicht mehr als eine Etappe, wenn man es so sagt, denn die Sache ist viel komplizierter, als man denkt. Die Sache ist nämlich so, wenn wir den Menschen zunächst auffassen — ich meine jetzt den irdischen Menschen -, wie er entsteht nach der Embryonalbildung, so haben wir etwa das Folgende: Wir haben vorausgehend beim Herunterkommen des Menschen aus der geistigen Welt in die physische Welt ein Heruntersteigen vom Ich, geistig, zum Astralischen, zum Ätherischen. Und indem nun das Ich in das Astralische hineingeht, in das Ätherische hineingeht, kann es dann den physischen Menschen im Embryonalischen ergreifen, bildet darin die Wachstumskräfte und so weiter. So daß also, wenn wir den Menschenkeim betrachten, wir das so haben, daß dieser Menschenkeim durch physische Kräfte erfaßt wird, die aber ihrerseits schon beeinflußt sind, weil das Ich heruntergestiegen ist durch das Astralische und durch das Ätherische in das Physische. Wenn wir den fertigen Menschen, der in der physischen Welt lebt, betrachten, so wirkt zum Beispiel durch sein Auge unmittelbar auf das Physische das Ich geistig ein mit Überspringung zunächst — später im Inneren des menschlichen Organismus gliedert es sich wiederum ein — des Astralischen und Ätherischen. Wir bringen erst von innen aus das Astralische und Ätherische entgegen. So daß wir sagen können: Das Ich lebt auf eine zweifache Weise in uns. Zunächst lebt es in uns, indem wir als Menschen auf der Erde geworden sind und das Ich erst heruntergestiegen ist in die physische Welt und uns dann vom Physischen aus aufgebaut hat mit Einschluß des Ätherischen und Astralischen. Dann aber lebt, indem wir erwachsene Menschen sind, das Ich in uns, indem das Ich durch die Sinne auf uns Einfluß gewinnt, oder indem das Ich auf das Astralische einen Einfluß gewinnt, des Astralischen sich bemächtigt und in unserem Atem Einfluß gewinnt mit Ausschluß der eigentlichen Ich-Sphäre, des Kopfes, wo der physische Leib zum Organ des Ich wird. Nur in unseren Gliedmaßenbewegungen, wenn wir unsere Gliedmaßen heute bewegen, haben wir dieselbe Betätigung der Natur oder der Welt in uns, die wir in uns haben, wenn wir Embryonen sind. Das andere alles ist aufgesetzt. Wenn Sie gehen, so wirkt in Ihnen heute noch — oder wenn Sie tanzen - dieselbe Tätigkeit, die wirkte, wie Sie Embryo waren. Alle anderen Tätigkeiten, insbesondere die Kopftätigkeit, sind hinzugekommen, indem immer die abwärtsgehenden Strömungen weggelassen worden sind.

Nun geht tatsächlich das musikalische Erlebnis durch den ganzen Menschen. Und zwar so, daß dasjenige beteiligt ist, was am meisten abwärtsgestiegen ist, was also, ich möchte sagen, auf eine zunächst außermenschliche Weise, bevor der irdische Mensch sich gebildet hat, an den Menschen herangekommen ist, was die Grundlage gebildet hat für die Embryobildung, was heute nur dadurch in uns lebt, daß wir uns bewegen können, auch durch Gesten bewegen können. Dasjenige, was so im Menschen lebt, ist zu gleicher Zeit die Grundlage für die unteren Glieder der Oktave, also: c, cis, d, dis. Jetzt kommt es in Unordnung, wie Sie auch auf dem Klavier sehen können, weil da die Geschichte ins Ätherische hineingeht. Bei den untersten Tönen der Oktave — jeder Oktave — wird zunächst alles dasjenige in Anspruch genommen, was eigentlich im Gliedmaßensystem des Menschen liegt, was also in dem Allerphysischsten des Menschen liegt. Jetzt, bei den Tönen etwa von e an, wirkt im wesentlichen das Vibrieren des ätherischen Leibes mit. Das geht dann wiederum bis f, fis, g. Dann kommen wir hinauf, wo dasjenige mitlebt, was in den Vibrationen des astralischen Leibes wirkt. Und dann spießt sich die Geschichte. Jetzt kommen wir, wenn wir vom c, cis ausgehen, wenn wir hier zu der Septime kommen, in eine Region hinauf, wo wir eigentlich stehenbleiben müssen. Das Erlebnis stockt, und wir haben ein ganz neues Element notwendig.

Wir sind, wenn ich mich so ausdrücken darf, von dem Innen-Ich ausgegangen, von dem physisch lebenden Innen-Ich, indem wir die Oktave begonnen haben. Und wir sind heraufgestiegen durch Ätherleib und astralischen Leib bis zur Septime und müssen jetzt übergehen zu dem direkt zu empfindenden Ich, indem wir zur Oktave heraufkommen. Wir müssen uns ein zweites Mal finden, wenn wir zur Oktave heraufkommen. Wir müssen gewissermaßen sagen: In allen sieben Tönen lebt eigentlich der Mensch in uns, aber wir wissen nichts davon. Er stößt an uns in c, cis, durchschüttelt, weil er von dort aus stößt, unseren ätherischen, unseren astralischen Leib, wenn wir, sagen wir, ein f oder ein fis haben; der Ätherleib vibriert, er stößt nach dem astralischen Leib herauf - der Ursprung ist unten im Ätherleibe -, und kommen wir zu den Tönen bis zur Septime hin, haben wir das Astralerlebnis. Aber so recht wissen wir das nicht. Wir wissen es nur empfindend. Die Oktavempfindung bringt uns das Finden des eigenen Selbstes auf einer höheren Stufe. Die Terz führt uns nach unserem Inneren; die Oktave führt uns dazu, uns selber noch einmal zu haben, noch einmal zu empfinden. — Sie müssen überall die Begriffe, die ich gebrauche, nur als Surrogate betrachten, überall auf die Empfindungen zurückgehen. Dann können Sie sehen, wie eigentlich das musikalische Erlebnis dahin strebt, den Menschen wiederum zu demjenigen zurückzuführen, was er in uralten Zeiten verloren hat. In uralten Zeiten, wo das Septimenerlebnis, also im Grunde genommen das ganze Skalenerleben da war, hat sich der Mensch im musikalischen Erlebnis als einheitliches, auf der Erde stehendes Wesen gefühlt, und dann war er im Septimenerlebnis auch außer sich. Also er hat sich in der Welt gefühlt. Musik war für ihn die Möglichkeit, in der Welt sich zu fühlen. Man konnte den Menschen überhaupt religiös unterrichten, indem man ihm die damalige Musik beibrachte, denn da verstand er gleich, daß man durch die Musik nicht nur irdischer Mensch ist, sondern entrückter Mensch zugleich. Nun verinnerlicht sich das immer mehr und mehr. Es kam das Quintenerlebnis, wodurch der Mensch sich noch mit dem verbunden fühlte, was in seinem Atem lebte. Die Quintenzeit war im wesentlichen die Zeit, wo der Mensch so empfand. Er sagte sich, er sagte es nicht, er empfand es so; wollen wir es aussprechen, müssen wir so sagen: Ich atme ein, ich atme aus. Beim Alpdruck verspüre ich durch die Modifikation des Atmens das Atemerlebnis besonders. Aber das Musikalische lebt gar nicht in mir, es lebt im Ein- und Ausatmen. - Er fühlte sich immer fortgehen in diesem Musik-Erleben und wieder zu sich kommen. Die Quinte war etwas, was Ein- und Ausatmen begriff, die Septime begriff überhaupt nur das Ausatmen. Die Terz versetzt ihn in die Möglichkeit, die Fortsetzung des Atmungsprozesses nach innen zu erleben. Aus allen diesen Gründen finden Sie auch die besondere Erklärung für das Fortschreiten von dem reinen Mit-Begleitung-Singen, wie es in älteren Zeiten der Menschheitsentwickelung war, zu dem selbständigen Singen. Der Mensch hat eigentlich zunächst immer an der Hand irgendeines äußeren Tones, eines äußeren Tongebildes das Singen herangebildet. Das emanzipierte Singen kam eigentlich erst später, womit auf der anderen Seite das emanzipierte Instrumentieren verknüpft ist, die emanzipierte Instrumentalmusik.

Nun kann man sagen: Der Mensch erlebte sich mit der Welt zusammen, indem er musikalisch erlebte. Er erlebte sich weder in sich noch außer sich. — Ein bloßes Instrument hätte er nicht hören können, einen abgesonderten Ton hätte er in der allerältesten Zeit nicht hören können. Es würde ihm so vorgekommen sein, wie wenn ein abgesondertes Gespenst herumgegangen wäre. Er konnte nur einen Ton, der aus äußerem Objektiven und innerem Subjektiven zusammengesetzt war, erleben. So daß also das Musik-Erleben sich nach diesen zwei Seiten trennt, nach dem Objektiven und nach dem Subjektiven.

Dieses ganze Erleben drängt sich natürlich heute in alles Musikalische herein. Wir haben auf der einen Seite etwas, was der Musik eine ganz besondere Stellung in der Welt gibt, das ist, daß der Mensch im musikalischen Erleben den Anschluß an die Welt noch nicht findet. Er wird einmal kommen, dieser Anschluß an die Welt, er wird kommen, wenn das Oktaverlebnis in der skizzierten Weise eintreten wird. Dann wird nämlich das musikalische Erlebnis für den Menschen der Beweis von dem Dasein Gottes sein, weil er das Ich zweimal erlebt, einmal als physisches Innen-Ich, das zweite Mal als geistiges Außen-Ich. Und indem man ebenso allgemein, wie man eine Septime, eine Quinte, Terzen verwendet, dann Oktaven mitverwendet — die heutige Verwendung ist noch nicht diese -, wird das auftreten als eine neue Art, das Dasein Gottes zu beweisen. Denn das wird das Oktaverlebnis sein. Man wird sich sagen: Wenn ich mein Ich einmal so erlebe, wie es auf der Erde ist, in der Prim, und es dann noch einmal erlebe, wie es im Geiste ist, dann ist das der innere Beweis vom Dasein Gottes. — Aber es ist ein anderer Beweis, als ihn der Atlantier durch sein Septimenerlebnis hatte. Da war alle Musik Beweis für das Dasein Gottes. Aber es war nicht im mindesten ein Beweis für das Dasein des eigenen Menschen. Wenn man musikalisch wurde, hatte einen der große Geist. Im Momente, wo man Musik trieb, war der große Geist in einem. Nun wird man da den großen Fortschritt der Menschheit im Musikalischen erleben, daß man nicht nur gottbesessen ist, sondern sich noch nebenbei hat, und das wird dazu führen, daß der Mensch einfach die Tonleiter als sich selber empfindet, aber sich selber als befindlich in beiden Welten. Sie können sich denken, welcher ungeheuren Vertiefung das Musikalische in der Zukunft noch fähig ist, indem es geradezu den Menschen nicht nur zu dem bringt, was er heute in unseren gewöhnlichen Musikkompositionen erleben kann, die ja gewiß sehr weit gekommen sind, sondern er wird erleben können, daß er während des Anhörens einer Musikkomposition ein ganz anderer Mensch wird. Er wird sich vertauscht fühlen und wiederum sich zurückgegeben fühlen. In diesem Fühlen einer weit auseinanderliegenden menschlichen Möglichkeit liegt die weitere Ausbildung des Musikalischen. So daß man also sagen kann: Zu den alten fünf Tönen d, e, g, a, h, ist eben f schon eigentlich bis zu einem allerhöchsten Grade hinzugekommen, noch nicht aber das eigentliche c. Das muß in seiner ganzen menschlichen Empfindungsbedeutung eigentlich erst hereinkommen.

Das alles aber ist außerordentlich wichtig, wenn man nun der Aufgabe gegenübersteht, die Entwickelung des Menschen in bezug auf das Musikalische zu leiten. Denn sehen Sie, das Kind bis so gegen das neunte Jahr hin hat, wenn man auch mit Dur- und Mollstimmungen an dasselbe herankommen kann, eigentlich noch nicht ein richtiges Auffassen von Dur- und Mollstimmungen. Das Kind, wenn wir es zur Schule hereinbekommen, kann ja zur Vorbereitung eines Späteren eben empfangen Dur- und Mollstimmungen, aber das Kind hat weder das eine noch das andere. Das Kind lebt noch im wesentlichen — so wenig man es gerne zugeben will - in Quintenstimmungen. Und daher wird man natürlich als Schulbeispiele dasjenige nehmen können, was auch schon Terzen hat; aber will man so recht an das Kind herankommen, so muß man das Musikverständnis von dem Quintenverständnis aus fördern. Das ist es, worauf es ankommt, während man dem Kinde eine große Wohltat erweist, wenn man mit Dur- und Mollstimmungen, überhaupt mit dem Verständnis des Terzenzusammenhanges so in jenem Zeitpunkte herankommt, den ich auch sonst bezeichnet habe als nach dem neunten Lebensjahre liegend, wo das Kind wichtige Fragen an uns stellt. Eine der wichtigen Fragen ist das Drängen nach dem Zusammenleben mit der großen und der kleinen Terz. Das ist etwas, was um das neunte und zehnte Lebensjahr auftritt, und was man ganz besonders fördern soll. Soweit wir es können nach unserem gegenwärtigen Musikbestande, ist es notwendig, daß man um das zwölfte Lebensjahr versucht, das Oktavenverständnis zu fördern. So wird den Lebensaltern wiederum angepaßt sein, was von dieser Seite her an das Kind herangebracht werden muß.

Ungeheuer wichtig ist es eben, sich darüber klar zu sein, daß Musik im Grunde genommen nur innerlich im Menschen lebt, im Ätherleibe, wobei dann der physische Leib natürlich mitgenommen wird für die unteren Skalentöne. Aber der muß in den Ätherleib heraufstoßen, und der wiederum an den astralischen Leib. An das Ich kann nur noch getippt werden nach oben.

Während wir mit unseren grobklotzigen Begriffen für die andere Welt immer in unserem Gehirn darin leben, kommen wir aus dem Musikalischen in dem Momente heraus, wo wir Begriffe entfalten. Das Musikalische liegt nämlich in einem solchen Gebiete, daß wir über ihm haben das Begriff-Entfalten. Denken wir, dann müssen wir aus der Musik heraus, weil der Ton anfängt, sich in sich selbst zu schattieren, er kann nicht mehr als Ton empfunden werden. Wenn der Ton anfängt, sich in sich selbst zu schattieren — die philiströse Wissenschaft würde sagen, wenn er eine bestimmte Anzahl Schwingungen hat -, wird er nicht mehr als Ton empfunden. Wenn er anfängt, sich in sich selbst zu schattieren, dann entsteht die Vorstellung, der Begriff, der sich dann verobjektiviert im Laute, der eigentlich den Ton aufhebt, im Laut, im Sprachlaut, der den Ton aufhebt, insoferne er Laut ist, nicht insoferne der Ton mitklingt natürlich. Und dann kommt das eigentliche musikalische Erleben nur hinunter bis zum Ätherleib, da kämpft es nun. Gewiß, das Physische stößt herauf in den unteren Tönen. Aber würden wir ganz in das Physische hinunterkommen, so würde nämlich der Stoffwechsel zum musikalischen Erleben mitgehören, und dann würde das musikalische Erleben aufhören, ein rein musikalisches Erleben zu sein. Das wird, ich möchte sagen, um das musikalische Erleben etwas prickelnder zu machen, in den Kontratönen auch erreicht. In den Kontratönen wird nämlich die Musik etwas aus sich selber herausgetrieben. Das eigentliche musikalische Erleben, das ganz innerlich verläuft, nämlich weder im Ich noch im physischen Leibe, sondern im ätherischen und astralischen Menschen, das eigentliche musikalische Empfinden, das innerlich ganz geschlossene musikalische Empfinden geht eigentlich nur bis zum Ätherleib, und zwar bis zu den großen Tönen. Die Kontratöne sind eigentlich nur dazu da, um gewissermaßen die Außenwelt heranschlagen zu lassen an das Musikalische. Die Kontratöne sind im Grunde genommen da, wo der Mensch nach außen mit dem Musikalischen hinschlägt und die Außenwelt wieder zurückschlägt, Es ist das Hereintreten des Musikalischen aus dem Seelischen in das Stoffliche. Wenn wir in die Kontratöne hinunterkommen, kommen wir mit der Seele in das Stoffliche hinein, und wir erleben noch dieses Sich-Bemühen des Stoffes, nun auch musikalisch beseelt zu werden. Das ist es, was im Grunde genommen die Stellung der Kontratöne in der Musik bedeutet. Alles muß uns dahin führen, uns zu sagen: Nur ein wirklich irrationales, nicht rationales Verständnis des Menschen führt uns dazu, das Musikalische auch irgendwie empfindend erreichen zu können und an den Menschen heranbringen zu können.

Nun wollen wir dann im einzelnen morgen fortfahren.

Sound Experience in Humans I

Of course, what we can discuss in these two days will only be very fragmentary, and I will speak in particular in a way that is necessary for the teacher. What I want to say is neither something aesthetic about music, as it is often called, nor something that someone who has a tendency to let their enjoyment of art be impaired by being told something that contributes to the understanding of this enjoyment of art would want to hear. In both directions, both on the side of music aesthetics as it is understood today and on the side of the mere enjoyer, one would have to speak differently. But today I want to establish a general foundation and tomorrow I will elaborate on a few things that may then be of significance in preparing such general foundations in the cultivation of music education. These things can then be elaborated on further another time.

With regard to music, it must be noted that as soon as one feels compelled to talk about it, all the concepts otherwise used in life immediately break down. It is almost impossible to talk about music using the concepts we are accustomed to using in other areas of life. This is simply because music does not actually exist in the physical world we inhabit. It must first be created in this given physical world. This then caused people like Goethe to perceive music as a kind of ideal of all art, so that Goethe could say: Music is entirely form and content and does not claim any other content than that which is given to it within its own element. This also led to the strange distinction being made by Hanslick between the content of music and the object of art during the period in which intellectualism struggled so extraordinarily with the understanding of music—a struggle that resulted in Hanslick's little book On the Beautiful in Music. Hanslick also gives music content, of course, albeit in a very one-sided way, but he denies it an object. Music does not have an object like that of painting, which exists in the external physical world. And this already indicates that even in our age, when intellectualism wanted to approach everything, we feel that intellectualism cannot actually approach music. For it can only approach that for which there are external objects. Hence this peculiarity that you will find everywhere in all kinds of well-meaning guides to understanding music, that sound physiology actually has nothing to say about music. This is a widely accepted admission: there is a sound physiology only for sounds, there is no sound physiology for tones. It is actually impossible to understand music using the means commonly available today. And that is why, when we begin to talk about music, we must not appeal to the usual concepts that otherwise help us understand our world.

Perhaps the best way to approach what we want to achieve in these two days is to take a specific, I would say contemporary historical starting point. If we compare our age with earlier ages, we find that our age is characterized in a very specific way in relation to music. One could say that our age stands midway between two musical sensibilities. One sensibility already exists, the other does not yet. The sensibility that our age has attained, at least to a certain high degree, is the sensibility of thirds. We can trace very well in history how the transition from the perception of fifths to the perception of thirds took place in the world of musical perception. The perception of thirds is something newer. On the other hand, what will one day exist does not yet exist in our age: the perception of octaves. A real sense of the octave has not yet been developed in humanity. You will feel the difference that exists in comparison to the perception of tones up to the seventh. While the seventh is still perceived in relation to the prime, a completely different experience occurs as soon as the octave approaches. It can no longer be distinguished from the prime; it coincides with the prime. In any case, the difference that exists for a fifth or a third does not exist for an octave. Certainly, we do have a feeling for it. But that is not yet the feeling that will one day develop and that is predisposed. The octave feeling will one day be something completely different. The octave feeling will one day be able to deepen the musical experience enormously. It will be such that every time the octave is asserted in a musical work of art, people will have a feeling that I can only describe as follows: I have recently found my self, I am elevated in my humanity by the sense of the octave. It is not what I am expressing here in words that is important, but what can be felt.

Well, one can only understand these things, understand them with feeling, if one realizes that the musical experience does not initially have the relationship to the ear that one usually assumes. The musical experience affects the whole human being, and the ear has a completely different function in the musical experience than is usually assumed. Nothing is more wrong than simply saying: I hear the sound, or I hear a melody with my ear. — That is completely wrong. The sound or a melody or any harmony is actually experienced with the whole person. And this experience comes to consciousness in a very peculiar way with the ear. Isn't it true that the sounds we usually reckon with have air as their medium? Even if we use any instrument other than a wind instrument, the element in which the sound lives is still air. But what we experience in sound has nothing to do with air. The thing is that the ear is the organ that separates the airy aspect from the sound before we experience it, so that when we experience the sound as such, we actually receive it as resonance, as reflection. The ear is actually the organ that reflects the sound living in the air back into our inner being, but in such a way that the air element is separated, and then the sound, when we hear it, lives in the ether element. So the ear is actually there, if I may express it this way, to overcome the sounding of the sound in the air and throw back to us the pure etheric experience of the sound. It is a reflection apparatus for the perception of sound.

Now it is a matter of understanding more deeply how the whole experience of sound is constituted in the human being. It is such that, I must say it again, all concepts become confused when it comes to the experience of sound. Isn't it true that we say: Man is a threefold being, a nerve-sense being, a rhythmic being, a limb-metabolism being. — Yes, this is actually as true as possible for all other circumstances. But for the experience of sound, for the musical experience, it is not entirely correct. For the musical experience, the sensory experience is not actually present in the same sense as for other experiences. The sensory experience in the musical experience is already much more internalized than in other experiences, because in the musical experience, the ear is actually only an organ of reflection; the ear does not actually connect the human being with the outside world in the same way as, for example, the eye. The eye connects the human being with the outside world for all forms of the visible, including the artistic forms of the visible. The eye is also relevant for the painter, not just for those who observe nature. The ear is only relevant for the musician insofar as it is able to experience without being connected to the outside world in the same way as, for example, the eye. The ear is relevant for music in that it is merely a reflexive apparatus. So we must actually say: For the musical experience, we must first consider humans as nervous beings. For it is not the ear that is relevant as a direct sensory organ, but only as a mediator to the inner world, not as a connector to the outside world — the perception of instrumental music is a very complicated process, which we will discuss later — but as a sensory organ, the ear is not directly relevant, but rather as an organ of reflection.

And again, if we go further, what is connected with the limbs of the human being does come into consideration for the musical experience, which is why the musical can also merge into the dance-like. But not in the same way as for the rest of the world does the metabolic human being come into consideration, so that we have actually already shifted the structure of the human being for the human being when we speak of the musical experience.

For the musical experience, we must say: nervous human being, rhythmic human being, limb human being. Sensory perceptions are switched off as accompanying phenomena. They are there because the human being is a sensory being, and his ear also has significance as a sensory organ, but it does not have the significance that we must attribute to it in other circumstances of the world. Metabolism is not present in the same way; it is an accompanying phenomenon. Metabolic phenomena occur, but they have no significance whatsoever. On the other hand, everything that lives as the possibility of movement in the limbs has significance. This has enormous significance for the musical experience, because we associate dance movements with the musical experience. And a good part of the musical experience is based on the fact that one must restrain oneself, must hold back the movements. But this points out to you that the musical experience is actually an experience of the whole human being.

Now, what is the basis for the fact that human beings today have a third experience? What is the basis for the fact that they are only on the way to having a true octave experience? It is based on the fact that all musical experience in human development actually takes us back — let's say, if we don't want to go further back, and there's no point in doing so — here I can say this — to the ancient Atlantean era. In the ancient Atlantean era, the most essential musical experience was the experience of the seventh. If you were to go back to the ancient Atlantean era, you would find that there — it bears very little resemblance to what music is today — everything was actually tuned in consecutive sevenths. They didn't even know fifths yet. And the experience of the seventh actually consisted in the fact that, in this musical experience built entirely on the experience of the seventh, through the octaves, one always felt completely transported. In this experience of the seventh, people felt themselves lifted out of their earthly bondage. They immediately felt themselves in another world. And people at that time could just as well have said, “I experience music,” as they could have said, “I feel myself in the spiritual world.” That was the predominant experience of the seventh. This continued even into the post-Atlantean period and played a major role until it began to be perceived as unpleasant. To the same extent that human beings wanted to move into their physical bodies, to take possession of their physical bodies, the seventh experience began to be felt as painful, quietly painful. And human beings began to take greater pleasure in the experience of the fifth, so that in fact there would have been a scale, built up according to our sequence, at that time, throughout long periods of time, in the post-Atlantean period: D, E, G, A, B, and again D, E. No F and no C. So we must think away the F sensation and the C sensation when we go back to the early post-Atlantean times. On the other hand, the fifths were experienced throughout the various octaves.

Over time, the fifths began to become the pleasant, agreeable musical sensation. But all music that works without the third and without what we today call c, all such musical experiences were imbued with a degree of rapture. It was definitely something that caused people to experience music as if they were transported into another element. One still felt lifted out of oneself in the music of fifths; one felt lifted out of oneself. And the transition to the experience of thirds, which can actually be traced back to the fourth post-Atlantean period—there, the experience of thirds is not yet fully present; what is actually present are experiences of fifths; the Chinese still have it today, the experience of fifths — this transition to the experience of thirds means at the same time that human beings feel music in connection with their own physical organization, that they first feel themselves as earthly human beings as musicians, so to speak, through their ability to experience thirds. Before, with the experience of fifths, they tended to say: The angel in me is beginning to become a musician. The muse speaks in me. “I sing” was not the right expression. To say “I sing” is only possible when the experience of thirds occurs. Then one can begin to feel oneself as the singer. For the experience of thirds internalizes the whole musical feeling. Therefore, during the time of the fifth, there was absolutely no possibility of coloring the musical according to the subjective element. Before the experience of the third came along, the subjective element was actually always that the subjective felt detached, felt transported into objectivity. It was only with the experience of the third that the subjective felt at peace within itself and man began to connect his own sense of destiny, the sense of destiny of ordinary life, with music. Therefore, that which had no meaning at all in the age of the fifth begins to have meaning. A major and minor have no meaning at all in the age of the fifth. One could not yet speak of major. Major and minor, this peculiar connection between human subjectivity, the actual inner life of feeling, insofar as this life of feeling is bound to earthly physicality, only begins in the course of the fourth post-Atlantean epoch and is linked to the experience of the third. This is where the difference between major and minor becomes apparent. This is when the connection between the subjective soul and music occurs. And human beings can color music; only now do they acquire color. They are sometimes within themselves, sometimes outside themselves; the soul swings back and forth between devotion and introspection. This is what draws music to human beings in a corresponding way. So that one can say: In the course of the fourth post-Atlantean epoch, the experience of the third begins, and at the same time the possibility of expressing major and minor moods in music. — We are still basically in this stage today. And how we are in this stage can only be illustrated by an understanding of the whole human being, but this understanding must go far beyond the usual concepts.

Of course, one becomes accustomed to practicing anthroposophy in such a way that it conforms to the usual concepts one has, and then one says: The human being consists of a physical body, an etheric body, an astral body, and an ego. — One must say this at first, because one must give the human being stages. But it is no more than a stage when you put it that way, because the matter is much more complicated than you think. The fact is that when we first consider the human being — I mean the earthly human being — as it arises after embryonic formation, we have something like the following: When human beings descend from the spiritual world into the physical world, we have a descent from the I, spiritually, to the astral, to the etheric. And as the I enters the astral, enters the etheric, it can then take hold of the physical human being in the embryonic state, forming the forces of growth and so on. So when we look at the human germ, we see that it is grasped by physical forces, which are themselves already influenced because the ego has descended through the astral and etheric into the physical. When we look at the finished human being living in the physical world, the ego, for example, acts spiritually on the physical through the eye, initially bypassing the astral and etheric, and later integrating itself within the human organism. We first encounter the astral and etheric from within. So we can say that the ego lives in us in two ways. First, it lives in us because we have become human beings on earth and the ego has first descended into the physical world and then built us up from the physical, including the etheric and astral. But then, as adult human beings, the I lives within us by influencing us through the senses, or by influencing the astral, taking possession of the astral and influencing our breath, excluding the actual sphere of the I, the head, where the physical body becomes the organ of the I. Only in our limb movements, when we move our limbs today, do we have the same activity of nature or the world within us that we have within us when we are embryos. Everything else is superimposed. When you walk, or when you dance, the same activity that was at work when you were an embryo is still at work in you today. All other activities, especially those of the head, have been added by omitting the downward currents.

Now the musical experience actually passes through the whole human being. And in such a way that what has descended most deeply is involved, that is, I would say, in a way that was initially non-human, before the earthly human being was formed, which approached the human being, which formed the basis for the formation of the embryo, which lives in us today only because we can move, can also move through gestures. That which lives in human beings in this way is at the same time the basis for the lower members of the octave, that is: C, C sharp, D, D sharp. Now it becomes disordered, as you can also see on the piano, because there the story enters into the etheric. In the lowest tones of the octave — of every octave — everything that actually lies in the limb system of the human being, that is, in the most physical part of the human being, is initially called upon. Now, in the tones from E onwards, the vibration of the etheric body essentially comes into play. This then continues up to F, F sharp, G. Then we ascend to where that which works in the vibrations of the astral body comes into play. And then the story comes to a head. Now, starting from C, C sharp, when we reach the seventh here, we ascend into a region where we actually have to pause. The experience comes to a standstill, and we need a whole new element.

We started, if I may say so, from the inner self, from the physically living inner self, when we began the octave. And we have ascended through the etheric body and astral body to the seventh, and now we must pass over to the directly perceptible self as we ascend to the octave. We must find ourselves a second time when we ascend to the octave. We must say, in a sense: in all seven tones, the human being actually lives within us, but we know nothing about it. It strikes us in C, C sharp, shakes us, because it strikes from there, our etheric body, our astral body, when we have, say, an F or an F sharp; the etheric body vibrates, it pushes up toward the astral body—the origin is down in the etheric body—and when we come to the tones up to the seventh, we have the astral experience. But we don't really know that. We only know it by feeling. The octave feeling brings us to the discovery of our own self on a higher level. The third leads us to our inner self; the octave leads us to have ourselves again, to feel again. — You must regard the terms I use everywhere as mere surrogates, and always go back to the feelings. Then you can see how the musical experience actually strives to lead human beings back to what they lost in ancient times. In ancient times, when the experience of the seventh, that is, basically the whole experience of the scale, was there, man felt himself to be a unified being standing on the earth in his musical experience, and then he was also beside himself in the experience of the seventh. So he felt himself to be in the world. Music was for him the possibility of feeling himself in the world. It was possible to teach people about religion by teaching them the music of that time, because then they immediately understood that through music they were not only earthly human beings, but also transcendent human beings. Now this is becoming more and more internalized. The experience of the fifth came, through which people still felt connected to what lived in their breath. The age of the fifth was essentially the time when people felt this way. They said to themselves, they did not say it, they felt it; if we want to express it, we must say: I breathe in, I breathe out. When I have nightmares, I feel the experience of breathing particularly strongly through the modification of my breathing. But music does not live in me at all, it lives in breathing in and out. He always felt himself departing in this musical experience and coming back to himself. The fifth was something that encompassed inhaling and exhaling, the seventh encompassed only exhaling. The third enabled him to experience the continuation of the breathing process inwardly. For all these reasons, you will also find the special explanation for the progression from pure singing along with accompaniment, as it was in earlier times of human development, to independent singing. Human beings actually always developed singing initially with the help of some external tone, some external sound pattern. Emancipated singing actually came later, which is linked to emancipated instrumentation, emancipated instrumental music.

Now one can say: Man experienced himself together with the world through musical experience. He experienced himself neither within nor outside himself. — They would not have been able to hear a mere instrument, nor would they have been able to hear a separate tone in the earliest times. It would have seemed to them as if a separate ghost were wandering around. They could only experience a tone that was composed of external objective and internal subjective elements. So the experience of music is divided into these two sides, the objective and the subjective.

This whole experience naturally intrudes into everything musical today. On the one hand, we have something that gives music a very special position in the world, namely that human beings do not yet find a connection to the world in their musical experience. This connection to the world will come one day, it will come when the octave experience occurs in the manner outlined. Then the musical experience will be proof of God's existence for human beings, because they will experience the I twice, once as the physical inner I, and the second time as the spiritual outer I. And by using octaves in the same general way as one uses a seventh, a fifth, or thirds — which is not yet the case today — this will appear as a new way of proving the existence of God. For that will be the octave experience. One will say to oneself: if I experience my self once as it is on earth, in the prime, and then experience it again as it is in the spirit, then that is the inner proof of God's existence. — But it is a different proof than that which the Atlanteans had through their experience of the seventh. There, all music was proof of God's existence. But it was not in the least a proof of the existence of one's own human being. When one became musical, one was possessed by the great spirit. The moment you played music, the great spirit was in you. Now you will experience the great progress of humanity in music, that you are not only possessed by God, but also have yourself, and this will lead to people simply perceiving the scale as themselves, but themselves as being in both worlds. You can imagine the tremendous depth that music will be capable of in the future, in that it will not only bring people to what they can experience today in our ordinary musical compositions, which have certainly come a long way, but they will also be able to experience that while listening to a musical composition, they become completely different people. They will feel transformed and then feel themselves returning. The further development of music lies in this feeling of a far-reaching human possibility. So one can say that to the old five tones D, E, G, A, B, F has actually been added to the highest degree, but not yet the actual C. That must first come in with its full human emotional significance.

All this is extremely important when faced with the task of guiding human development in relation to music. For you see, even though the child can be approached with major and minor keys up to about the age of nine, it does not yet have a proper understanding of major and minor keys. When we bring the child into school, it can receive major and minor keys in preparation for later, but the child has neither one nor the other. The child still lives essentially — as little as we would like to admit it — in fifths. And so, of course, we can use examples in school that already have thirds; but if we really want to reach the child, we must promote musical understanding based on an understanding of fifths. This is what matters, while it is a great benefit to the child if one approaches it with major and minor modes, and indeed with an understanding of the relationship between thirds, at the point in time that I have otherwise described as lying after the age of nine, when the child asks us important questions. One of the important questions is the urge to understand the relationship between the major and minor thirds. This is something that occurs around the age of nine or ten, and it should be encouraged in particular. As far as we can with our current musical repertoire, it is necessary to try to promote an understanding of octaves around the age of twelve. In this way, what needs to be brought to the child from this perspective will again be adapted to their age.

It is extremely important to be aware that music basically only lives within the human being, in the etheric body, whereby the physical body is naturally carried along for the lower tones of the scale. But it must rise up into the etheric body, and that in turn into the astral body. The ego can only be touched upwards.

While we always live in our brains with our crude concepts of the other world, we emerge from the musical realm the moment we develop concepts. The musical realm lies in such a realm that we have concept development above it. When we think, we have to leave music behind, because the sound begins to shade itself; it can no longer be perceived as sound. When the sound begins to shade itself — philistine science would say when it has a certain number of vibrations — it is no longer perceived as sound. When it begins to shade itself, then the idea arises, the concept, which then objectifies itself in the sound, which actually cancels out the tone, in the sound, in the speech sound, which cancels out the tone insofar as it is sound, not insofar as the tone naturally resonates with it. And then the actual musical experience only comes down to the etheric body, where it now struggles. Certainly, the physical pushes up into the lower tones. But if we were to descend completely into the physical, then metabolism would become part of the musical experience, and then the musical experience would cease to be a purely musical experience. This is also achieved in the counter-tones, I would say, in order to make the musical experience a little more exciting. In the counter-tones, the music is driven out of itself, so to speak. The actual musical experience, which takes place entirely within, neither in the ego nor in the physical body, but in the etheric and astral human being, the actual musical feeling, the inner, completely closed musical feeling, actually only goes as far as the etheric body, and that is to the high tones. The counter-tones are actually only there to allow the outside world to strike the musical, so to speak. The counter-tones are basically there where the human being strikes outwards with the musical and the outside world strikes back. It is the entry of the musical from the soul into the material. When we descend into the counter-tones, we enter the material world with our soul, and we experience the striving of the material to become musically animated. That is what the position of counter-tones in music basically means. Everything must lead us to say: only a truly irrational, non-rational understanding of human beings enables us to somehow reach the musical in a feeling way and bring it to human beings.

Now let us continue in detail tomorrow.