Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

Curative Education
GA 317

6 July 1924, Dornach

Lecture XI

We will now go on to consider the children of whom we had not time to speak yesterday.

There was a little girl of ten years old, who was suffering from loss of memory. She is only in the Second Class at school (where the children would be mostly about seven years old.) She has adenoids. The symptom is connected with an excess of etheric powers of growth in the region of the bladder, which condition is then reflected in the head. Thus we have here a case where the physical origin of the trouble is immediately patent. The girl is ten years old—that is to say, she is at the age when, as I have repeatedly pointed out, it is particularly important that the teacher shall have made the right relationship with the child.

The child herself has of course, so to speak, slept through the antecedent facts and processes that have led up to the present moment. The inflamed condition that shows itself in the neighbourhood of the bladder and has its reflection in the upper part of the organism is clear evidence of the fact that the ether body is not properly at home in the organism—the reason being that its co-operation with the astral body is not able to come about as it should. You must never lose sight of the fact that where a process of this kind occurs, which finds expression in the soul organism, then its source and origin has to be sought in the subtler, finer organisation of the body; for the coarser, cruder organisation cannot put us on the right track in our search. An irregularity in the higher organisation of man is, naturally, more easily noticed than in the lower organisation. In this child, owing to a defective astral body, the ether body does not function properly, with the result that what the child receives by way of impressions fails to penetrate into the organisation. What we have to do, therefore, if we are to help such a child, is to strengthen as much as ever possible the impressions we intend her to receive; in all our work with her, we must see to it that strong impressions are brought to bear on the child.

For consider how it is with memory. Memory is dependent on a right and proper organic relation between physical body and ether body; astral body and I have no part in the retention of impressions in memory. As you know very well, dreams make their appearance only when astral body and ego have begun to enter into the physical and ether body, not before. As far as astral body and ego are concerned, everything is forgotten between the times of falling asleep and awakening. The impressions are left lying in the part of the human being that remains in bed. But when, as in the child we are considering, this part is not properly organised, then what is left there of the impression of the day does not succeed in embodying itself into it. Our first task will be therefore to induce strong impressions, in order to bring it about that the higher organisation—I and astral body—shall be roused to an energetic activity within the lower organisation—ether body and physical body.

I do not know whether the experiment has yet been made of testing the little girl's memory for simple folk-melodies? (Frl. Dr. K.: “She finds that easier.”) So the capacity for receiving impressions of this nature is, you see, present. Starting from it, we should now try to work on further. We should, for example, take with the child little poems where a refrain is repeated—say, after every three lines. She will in this way receive a powerful impression of rhythm; and then later on, the moment will come when we can approach her with impressions that are without rhythm. Do not imagine that any substantial success can be looked for under three or four years—that is, not before puberty. Working on these lines, we must first reach the point where rhythmical impressions are able to act upon the child, and then go on to non rhythmical impressions. In this way we shall be able to achieve something in the educational sense. The therapy we have already indicated; the girl should have compresses with Berberis vulgaris 10 per cent, and Curative Eurythmy: L—M:S—U.

Note that an inner perception underlies the giving of these particular sounds in Curative Eurythmy. The formative, moulding influence will enter right into the mobile astral body. Then the M, as I have told you, is the sound that places the whole organism into the out-breathing, and so the astral organisation will there meet the etheric. With S, the aim is to bring the astral body into powerful and living activity—but it must be an activity that is restrained, held in check; and for this purpose the U is added. These are the measures that suggested themselves when we had the child immediately before us; here we are simply recalling them. Compresses of Berberis vulgaris are prescribed because the causes of inflammation require to be neutralised, and can be by this means.

And then we had a sixteen-year-old boy, a kleptomaniac of the very same type as the little fellow who was brought before you a few days ago, and in whom you could see a perfect example of kleptomania. Your boy at Lauenstein will have to be treated on exactly the same lines. You will need however to watch whether the impressions you bring to him link up with this or that. The results of our work with kleptomaniacs can differ quite considerably according to the education the children have already received.E6At Lauenstein, Dr. Steiner said that the pathological symptoms which reveal themselves in this boy are due to some suffering he underwent in his previous incarnation. He had perhaps been alone for a long time—stranded maybe from a shipwreck and forced to spend long and tedious days in solitude. This experience was then transformed and shows itself today as weakness of the ego.

For treatment, the boy should have sugar injections D 6, seven injections in fourteen days. Afterwards he should be sponged with starchy water, this treatment also to be continued for fourteen days. The body will have to change the starch into sugar, and that will provide another means of stimulating the ego.

Dr. Steiner's advice for the education of the boy was as follows: He must keep a diary, recording all that he has done right through the day. That will strengthen his I. He should have stories told him with pedagogical purpose in them, stories in which it turns out that people who steal get the worst of it. The magpie is always thieving, and in consequence the other birds will have nothing to do with it. Then, the boy should be taught some practical job. He should learn how boots are made. “He could make boots for your whole family!” He could also learn gardening. And he should be encouraged to solve all manner of little practical problems. For example, how the door of a train might be so constructed that as soon as someone got on to the step, the door would open (and afterwards close again) automatically—and other things of that kind.

And now we must go on to speak of the child who is so restless and fidgety. A sleepy, backward little boy, who has not learned to speak and is behind-hand with all the education he should have received in the first epoch of life. You can see at once what is lacking; the child has entirely failed to get hold of the principle of imitation, he has never attempted to imitate. This means, in other words, that his I and astral body are incapable of bringing his organs into movement. He is a most lovable little fellow, but it is extraordinarily difficult for him to overcome the longing that he has in his physical body for rest and quiet. The first thing to be done is to give him Tone Eurythmy. That will be the way to help him on. (You will understand, I can do no more here than indicate the ideal.) If the boy does Tone Eurythmy properly, it can come about that he is so stirred and stimulated in his astral body that the rhythm begins to take hold also of the ether body.

Another thing you must do is to let him repeat after you rhythmical sentences, so that he plunges, as it were, right into sound as such. Take, for instance, the line: “Und es woget und woget und brauset und zischt.” [From Schiller's Der Taucher.] You must go through the sentence with the child rather slowly (you will discover for yourselves what is just the right pace), first forwards and then backwards. (For this particular case, I purposely say “woget” instead of “siedet”, since we are here using the line with a therapeutical end in view.) Go on doing this again and again, forwards and backwards. Wherever possible, the same method should also be followed with a sequence of vowels. In this way we can awaken the child, inwardly. Surprise, amazement, begin to rise up in him, as we get him to intone A (ah), then E (eh), I (ee); and then backwards, I, E, A; then again, A, E, I, and so on. The child gradually wakes up, and, despite all difficulties, the principle of imitation will begin at last to work. It will be necessary to take the child by himself, and to see to it that imitation has its place in everything you do with him; always stop after a few moments and get him to intone after you.

And then, in addition, some therapeutical treatment will be needed; and here you will have to ensure that two opposite influences work together. First, you must provide a dispersing influence that works centrifugally and drives the substantiality of the organism to the circumference. Hypophysis always works in this way. For the child we are considering, hypophysis must not however be used just in the way we use it for rickety children in whom we definitely want to induce dispersal. Here we have to call into action at the same time the opposite principle that works centripetally. You will accordingly need to find something which will have, while working together with hypophysis, the tendency to build up the human organism out of substance. Both Carbo Vegetabilis and Carbo Animalis are able to do this. You could therefore use Carbo Animalis, alternating it with the hypophysis. The Carbo Animalis will supply the form principle, and then in the hypophysis cerebri you will have the organising principle that tends to encourage organic growth.

One of the most important things to bear in mind, when you are starting a Home for Curative Education, is the necessity for constant observation. Each single person who is helping in the work must observe everything he or she takes in hand to do with the children. And it should really be so that we accompany—and in that way strengthen—all that we do with a certain inner trust and confidence.

In the case of this child, our worst trouble will be, not with the boy himself—you will soon be able to notice progress in him—but with the parents. The mother is firmly convinced it is for us to do wonders with him, and that quickly. I have heard that she even wants to come with the child. (One of the teachers interposed: “She is only bringing him to us.”) That is better, it is a relief to hear that you will not have the mother there with you. But with a child of this kind, it will, in any case, be imperative to hold your own—even with a certain obstinacy—in face of the demands and expectations of the parents. These demands are perfectly understandable, but sometimes terribly foolish and unwise. The parents of such a child do not, and cannot, know what is right and necessary for him.

Now it will be very good if you can bring such a child even physically also into the alternating conditions that can be induced by means of the A E I, I E A, etc. I will tell you an excellent way of doing this. First, put the child into a bath of moderately warm water, and then, comparatively quickly, give him instead a douche, also of a moderate temperature. You will by this means call to life that which needs to be roused to life and activity. As a matter of fact, wherever an abnormality expresses itself in laziness and inertia, this measure cannot fail to have good effect, so long as we are careful not to overdo it. Do not be anxious if, immediately after a bath treatment of this kind has been begun, the children get rather excited. That will pass. You will see, a reaction will come, and a more balanced condition gradually establish itself.

And now we must pass on to another boy who sees everything in colours. He is the boy, you remember, who never has any money! I can see him there before me as I speak. The fundamental fact about this child is that he is incapable of making the right approach to the external world; he remains rooted in himself. In order to render this phenomenon intelligible, I shall have to explain it for you in plastic terms. The boy cannot make his way out into the external world; consequently his I organisation is perpetually pushing at his astral body from within. This gives rise to an inner clumsiness—better expressed, an inner slovenliness. But along with this, in connection with the continual pressure on the astral body, there develops also a delicate sensitiveness; so that the boy has really something gentle and noble about him. And that goes together with the seeing in colour. He sees colours because he is able to be awake in his astral body.

Now, we cannot begin to do anything in the way of education for this boy until we have a clear perception of a state of affairs that is developing in him all the time in increasing measure—namely, a certain dim hankering after ideals, but at the same time a starting-back, a flinching from the world as from something he cannot get on with. The boy can be taught entirely on the lines of Waldorf School education, but everything will depend in his case on how you yourself feel and behave towards him; you must preserve all the time a natural trust and confidence in him. There is really hardly anything more than this to be said.

Take for example, writing. The boy writes something like this, does he not? Now it will be for you to set to work and take the utmost care and pains that he shall gradually change his handwriting and develop it into a finely formed script. And you will find that while he is doing this, there will be clear signs also of a transformation taking place in his whole inner constitution. When he shows a tendency to boast and talk big, then you must at once, on the basis of the trust he has learned to place in you, contrive some means to make his boasting ridiculous.E7In reference to this boy, Dr. Steiner spoke of a “dwarfed or stunted pituitary body.”

Therapy: Injections of hypophysis (pituitary body) and treatment with arsenic, as indicated in the lecture.

Curative Eurythmy: L, M, S, R.

Note 8.

I was speaking to you yesterday about the albinos, and I came to the point where I said we need to find the cosmic impulse that can have influence in such cases. Let us now first ask our expert on cosmic constellations whether she has noticed anything special in these or other horoscopes that albinos have in common. (To Dr. Vreede) Did you notice that among the outer planets, Uranus and Neptune were particularly prominent? (Dr. Vreede replied: “Yes, there are many such aspects. Apart from that, I should not have anything special to say about them.”) I address my question purposely to you, because you are frequently engaged in the contemplation of horoscopes and have probably often had such things in your mind. Up to now, I have from you only these two that we are considering. We are here treading new ground, and it will be best if we go forward entirely in the spirit of discovery. A great many factors in the case might well claim consideration, but I would like us to give our attention for the moment to the following.

Consider the human being. We divide him into certain members. In accordance with that memberment which arranges the whole nature and being of man rather from the etheric principle, we divide him, as you know, into physical body, etheric body, sentient body, which last we then bring into relation with sentient soul; after that we have intellectual or mind soul (which the Greeks call soul of force or power), and consciousness or spiritual soul. And then we come to spirit-self, life-spirit and spirit-man. And all these several members reveal themselves to us as forming together a single, relatively independent whole; taken all together, they compose man. But now, the way in which the members are put together to compose man, differs in each single human being. One person will have a little more power and strength in his ether body, and correspondingly less in his physical body; another a little more power in the consciousness soul; and so on. And right in the midst of all these members stands man in his very own individuality, which individuality goes through repeated earth lives and has the task of bringing under control this whole connection of various members, has the task of uniting them, on the principle of freedom, under one individual ordering.

And now let us see how that which comes to man from cosmic realms unites itself with these several members. The influence of the Sun, which works strongly on man as a whole, works strongest of all on the physical body. In connection with the etheric body we find that the strongest influences come from the Moon; in connection with the sentient body it is the influences of Mercury that work with special strength; and in the sentient soul we have the strongest influences of Venus. The strongest influences of Mars serve to help the development of the intellectual or mind soul, and of Jupiter the consciousness or spiritual soul, whilst Saturn brings its influences to bear especially on the spirit self. And the members that have not yet developed in man find their support in Uranus and Neptune—the vagrants, so to speak, among the planets, who attached themselves at a later time to our planetary system. In Uranus and Neptune therefore we shall expect to find planetary influences which, under normal conditions, exert no very strong influence upon the constellation at birth.

Spirit-ManNeptune
Life-SpiritUranus
Spirit-SelfSaturn
Spiritual SoulJupiter
Intellectual SoulMars
Sentient SoulVenus
Sentient BodyMercury
Ether BodyMoon
Physical BodySun

You know of course, from other anthroposophical lectures how strong is the influence of the Moon on man, via the ether body. I need not remind you of how the Moon is connected with the whole principle of heredity, of how it impresses all manner of forces and powers into the model of the physical body, which comes from the parents. Beginning with the earliest embryonic development, this Moon influence determines the whole direction that development shall take in the child.

Now it is possible for a constellation to occur where the impulse from the Moon is sufficiently strong for the human being descending to Earth to receive by way of heredity a disposition to be drawn down into the metabolic organisation. Or again, it can also happen that the Moon influences are to some extent wrested away, turned aside, whilst influences that come from quite another quarter and that refuse to tolerate the Moon influences, namely Uranus and Neptune, attract what should really be in the sphere of the Moon's influence: Other constellations are also possible. But in the case of the children we are considering, the latter is the constellation that we find; and we have here a clear instance of how by looking at what the horoscope shows we can see what is really the matter.

Take first this horoscope (of the elder sister). It will probably have struck you that you find here in this region, Uranus together with Venus and Mars. You will not really need to carry your considerations any further than this triangle. Here then are Mars, Venus and Uranus. Consider first Mars. For this child, who was born in 1909, Mars stands in complete opposition to the Moon. Mars, which has Venus and Uranus in its vicinity, stands—itself—in strong opposition to the Moon. Here is the Moon and here is Mars. And Mars pulls along with it Uranus and Venus.

And now I would ask you to pay careful attention also to the fact that the Moon is at the same time standing before Libra. This means, the Moon has comparatively little support from the Zodiac, it wavers and hesitates, it is even something of a weakling in this hour; and its influence is still further reduced through the fact that Mars (which pulls along with it the Luciferic influence) stands in opposition to it.

Now let us turn to the horoscope of the young child. Again, here are Venus and Uranus and Mars near together, the three of them covering between them no more than this section of the heavens. So you see, once again these three are found near to each other. In the case of the elder girl we saw that they were standing in opposition to the Moon, which was at the time standing in Libra. On this second horoscope, Mars, Venus and Uranus are in close proximity, exactly as before; but when we examine more nearly the position of Mars, we find it is not, as before, in complete opposition to the Moon. It is however very nearly so. Although the younger child does not come in for a complete opposition, there is an approximation to opposition.

But what strikes us as still more remarkable is that when we come to make our observation of the Moon, we discover she is again in Libra—while being at the same time, as we have seen, almost in opposition to Mars, which latter drags Uranus and Venus along with it. We have therefore again a background of Libra. I am not saying that it must have been so; we have, you see, no properly authorised records of the births. On the first horoscope the Moon is in Libra, and here on the second too. (Dr. Vreede said: “It is curious that in both there is also the same constellation between Moon and Neptune.”) That would have to be explained on its own account. Horoscopes require to be interpreted quite individually. It is not a matter for surprise that there is this similarity in the two horoscopes, considering that the girls are sisters. That we find in the elder child a stronger opposition than in the younger (who has been influenced by the elder) is also no cause for astonishment. What is important for us is that we find here a constellation that is perfectly intelligible, a constellation that, when interpreted, shows us the following.

Mars, who is the bearer of iron, makes himself independent of the principle of propagation—independent, that is, of the Moon. He brings away from its true mission that which comes to man through the Venus principle and is connected with love. Mars tears this out of its true path of action, does not allow it to be in connection with generation, nor afterwards with growth; with the result that that which rightly stands in connection with the growth forces and should live in the lower part of the body, presses up into the head organisation. Consequently we find that in the growth process that takes place within the child iron will be lacking, whereas everything that tends to be in conflict with iron, notably sulphur, will be present to excess.

We have therefore here to do with an extraordinarily strong predestination of the will, and our first concern must be to see that we treat the nerves-and-senses organisation of these two children with the utmost care and delicacy. Their nerves-and-senses organisation is, as a whole, slippery and unstable, unable to endure strong impressions; and we must be ready at every moment with the right thing to do, we must sense it in our finger-tips! A fine feeling and tact is needed in all one's dealings with the nerves-and-senses organisation of children of this kind; especially must we avoid straining the eyes in reading and such-like occupations. Try to impart your teaching without requiring the use of the eyes at all—I mean, without any reading. On the other hand, accustom the eyes to colour impressions where the colours shade off gently into one another. For instance, let the colours of the rainbow pass over from one into another, slowly, the child following all the time with her gaze. There you have, you see, measures that will be quite easy to carry out.

If you are also to treat the children therapeutically, there is just one thing I must tell you, and that is, that after puberty the remedies will no longer be very effective. And that can be an important indication for you, since the one child was born in 1909, and the other in I921; the effects of treatment can in their case be thoroughly observed and the difference noted.

What we want to do for a child of this kind is to introduce powerful radiations of iron, letting them stream up from the metabolism-and-limbs organisation. The way to bring this about is to take pyrites in very fine powder form and lay it on a surface that transmits iron radiations only very slightly. A glass surface would fulfil this condition, but naturally you cannot use glass. So you must try using a clean grease-saturated paper; best of all would be a very thin parchment-like paper, but it must be really thin so that it clings to the body. Ordinary paper that is made from linen rags is no good. You must rub resin or something of that sort over the paper and sift the pyrites powder finely on to it. By this means you can bring the iron radiation to enter right into the child. Lay the paper all along the legs and on the shoulder-blades, and then try the application of a “drawing” compress—say, of cochlearia—on the forehead.

If this treatment be applied to the organism at the time when the change of teeth is taking place—a time when particularly powerful streamings and counter-streamings (or radiations) are going on—much can be done towards overcoming the instability.

Such is then the result of our investigations so far. The problem must of course be the subject of further study. Up to now, the world has done nothing with albinos except expose them for show, getting them to tell their tale: “I am rather fat, I have white hair, I can see nothing by day, I can see better at night.” This is the kind of thing that actually goes on with albinos today, and there is on the whole very little knowledge about them; for the scientists of our day do not concern themselves with problems of this nature. But directly we turn our attention to striking facts such as those I have been putting before you here we begin to see how strongly the cosmic influence is working, wherever this complete irregularity is present in the mutual disposition of the members of the human being.

And now I should like you to bring forward any questions you are wanting to ask.

(Question: “That we find ourselves in the situation of having questions to ask has come about through Dr. L. approaching Frau Dr. Wegman on quite other grounds. He was of opinion that the mood of those attending the lectures was not as it should be.”)

It is surely quite unnecessary that we should waste time discussing what is after all a simple matter. Dr. L. came to me and explained that there was a deep feeling among the Lauenstein members of the importance of the task they were undertaking; they felt they were about to embark upon what would prove to be a new mission within the Anthroposophical Movement, and it would surely be good if the karmic connections between those who are engaging in the work could be thoroughly explained and understood. (l. shakes his head.) Well, anyway, let us concentrate our attention on the main point. What L. said amounted to this: The Lauenstein members believe that they have now set out upon a task that is entirely new and of fundamental importance; to which I replied that in that case what they will need before all else will be sincerely and faithfully to learn what is being given in this course. If it should prove that anyone is not satisfied with what is being given in this course of lectures and would rather remain in the realm of abstractions, would rather set to work, for example, to organise a completely new movement, then all I can say is that such an attitude would be no more than the natural result of practices that have been followed only too long among our members. Anyone taking such a path would find himself in danger of megalomania. Nevertheless, in order that the partly justified feelings in the background may have ample opportunity to find expression, I have asked you to put your questions. And so now our best plan will be to ask and consider together quite practical questions.

(S. asks, what connection has the Lauenstein Home with the fact that Trüper [Johannes Trüper, 1855-1921, Founder and for many years Leader of the Youth Sanatorium in Jena.] was the first to undertake the education of backward children.)

What do you mean? That Trüper was the first to concern himself with these children and do something for them? You are attaching too much importance to the work of this man. I do not think that the Educational Homes for backward children which were started in Hanover—very early, comparatively speaking, and not without success—can have been influenced by Trüper. In point of fact, the first step in this direction dates much farther back. But what has been lacking all along is just the very thing that can enable one to look right into the whole being of the child. For we have really no means of discovering the simplest facts without the help of anthroposophical knowledge. And the converse is no less true, that the human beings themselves are constantly affording us new and deeper insight into Anthroposophy.

Consider how it is, for instance, with regard to Goethe's Theory of Metamorphosis. In the form it was able to develop under Goethe himself, who was after all a clever man, it appears to us today, does it not, as an abstract theory? It abounds in statements and premises, but has to be content with showing how the leaf lives in the blossom, how a petal changes into a stamen, etc.—treating, that is, of no more than an elementary metamorphosis. When it goes on to speak of animal and man, all that the theory can do is to adduce—rather shyly—the transformation of the vertebrae into the bones of the skull. In no realm of nature does it get beyond the elementary stage. I myself was amazed and perplexed. Did it never dawn upon Goethe—so I kept asking myself all through the eighties—that the whole brain is a transformation of one single ganglion? Spiritually, I could see that it was so; it had dawned upon him. Then, later on, I made a discovery, which showed that it was only Goethe's discreet reserve which had restrained him all the time from giving expression to the truth he clearly perceived. When I came to Weimar, I found in a little note-book—which was written all in pencil—this note: The brain is a transformed main ganglion. It was not until the nineties of last century that that sentence of Goethe's found its way, through me, into print. Suddenly it was as though a new author made his appearance; Goethe became thenceforward the most fruitful of authors.

But now consider what a long way it is from the Theory of Metamorphosis as taught by Goethe to the Theory of Metamorphosis as demonstrated in the one-year-old little child who was lying there before you a few days ago—normal in other respects, but metamorphosed into a giant embryo. That was an instance of a metamorphosis of retardation, where the embryonic condition was retained after birth. And you will yourselves come to acquire a true insight into this kind of metamorphosis if you continue to practise again and again the meditation I gave you yesterday, when I told you: Here is a circle, here is a point; there the circle is a point, there the point of a circle, and so (see Figure 3.). Over and over again you must, in meditation, let the circle steal into the point, let the point expand to the circle. As you do this, you will find that something reveals itself to you, namely, how the metabolism-and-limbs organisation comes into being out of the head organisation. Continue with the meditation until, when you say to yourself: The point is a point, the circle is a circle, you are sensible of the head; and when you say to yourself: The point is a circle, the circle is a point—when, that is, you assert the converse—you discover that you are gliding right down into the metabolic system. You will then have before you the developed Theory of Metamorphosis, and you will see quite clearly that it is only through this kind of thinking that we can ever hope to attain insight into the nature of the defects in backward children. And this is what we have been attempting in these lectures.

Search for the impulses that are already there in the place where you are beginning your work; find what impulses are there that can inspire you with enthusiasm and so make for a continuity. Ask yourselves the question: What antecedents are there here which we can link onto?

Now, as you know, a remarkable historical figure is associated with Jena. Once, long ago, the German Abbot Hildebrand, feeling within him—exactly as do the youth of today—great gifts and capacities, moved too, as they also are, by religious and spiritual impulses (but in his case the spiritual was methodically conceived), went to Rome, became Pope Gregory VII, and strongly influenced the direction given from Rome to the course of affairs in European history. We have thus a powerful Roman impulse, spreading its activity out over Europe, mediated through an impulse that derives from the order of Cluny and has been transplanted into the Roman stream. You should study that passage of history. For the remarkable thing is that in his next life on Earth this individuality is drawn to Jena and appears there as Ernst Haeckel. The development is really just the same as happens in the human being when the disintegrating principle inserts itself, dovetails itself, in a regular manner into the upbuilding principle. So you have here in Jena a centre for currents of influence that are in direct and explicit opposition to the current of Roman activity. Jena is the meeting place of opposite streams.

Haeckel made a speech in Jena on his sixtieth birthday. He was speaking on that occasion at the Phylogenetic Institute. Listening to him, one could really have the feeling that the old Hildebrand was standing there before one. The same manner of expression, the very same kind of delivery—speaking slowly, with a good deal of “padding”, weighing the words carefully, like someone who has done quite a lot of speaking and yet never made himself quite master of the art. Another curious thing could be noticed. Abbot Hildebrand, who had of course always very much the air of being a strict Pope—he would stand there before you as the very mouthpiece of the Church—had, at the same time, this trait in his character: he was fond of relating stories that made the rest of the company smile—not overmuch, but with pleasure and enjoyment. And now with Haeckel, it was really quite delightful to watch how he would sometimes at dinner between the courses fall into the mood of telling funny anecdotes out of his own life, and loosening in this way the tongues of the rest of the company. This sixty-year-old man with his childlike smile would lead the others on, and by his whole manner and behaviour bring them right away from the subject in hand. I can still remember how amusing it was to see Oskar Hertwig sitting there in travail with his speech that could not be brought to birth, while Haeckel went on and on with one funny story after another.

You would, I believe, find yourselves well repaid if, now that I have laid for you this esoteric foundation, you were to get hold of this speech that Haeckel made on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. It is not long, but remarkable for being personal and at the same time extraordinarily objective. And then compare with it the speech delivered by Prof. Gärtner, who invariably manifested a disinclination to see in Haeckel a person of any particular historical significance. Indeed, he expressly states in his speech that this time he will leave out of account that Haeckel is the author of the “History of the Creation” and concentrate attention on the vast number of microscope slides that Haeckel has made; for we shall find, he says, that Haeckel has made more slides than all the rest of us put together—a most remarkable fact; actually the rest of us have made so few, that taken all together ours fail to reach the number made by Haeckel alone. A pedant, a regular pedant, this Gärtner! Really quite absurd! In Haeckel's speech you have something so alive, so quick with fresh, new life! Then the scaffold is brought in, and Gärtner comes forward and performs the execution, while the physiologist (a Catholic clerk in holy orders!) looks sadly on.E8The title of this booklet is Lieder zum Commers in Jena am 17 Februar 1894. The verse referred to, from the song 'Zoologischer Jubelgruss' by Edwin Bormann is as follows:

Staunet nicht, O Festkumpane,
Wenn ein Archaeopt'ryx jetzt
Eben an der Rathausfahne
Seinen werthen Schnabel wetzt;
Wer heut' heimwärts sucht die Pfade
Geh' voll Fürsicht Schritt für Schritt,
Dass er auf der Promenade
Nicht'nen Plesiosaurus tritt. :' :

An English equivalent might read:

On your homeward way, good people,
Should you chance to find a sleek
Pterodactyl, on the steeple
Whetting of his noble beak,
Do not be surprised or flustered,
But turn the corner with some care,
For you'll very, very likely
Find a Dinosauros there.

But what a power Haeckel was amid all that company! What a rejuvenating influence he had upon them! Even the young students grew suddenly brilliantly clever, and showed quite remarkable powers of imagination. Look up the little book where all the songs are recorded which were sung that day. You will find a most witty account of how an archaeopteryx sharpened his bill on a church steeple. That book of songs will enable you to form some picture of the fresh young life that suddenly blossomed forth in Jena on that day.

This event too I would commend for your meditation. By entering meditatively into the event, you will come to have an intimate experience of the place occupied by Jena in the spiritual evolution of Europe.

Elfter Vortrag

Nun wollen wir noch die Fälle besprechen, die gestern nicht zur Sprache gekommen sind. Es war noch ein jüngeres Mädchen von zehn Jahren da, das litt an Gedächtnisschwund. Es ist erst in der zweiten Schulklasse. Es hat Wucherungen im Nasenrachenraum; das hängt zusammen mit dem zu starken ätherischen Wuchern in der Blasengegend, das sein Spiegelbild hat im Kopf. Bei dem Mädchen konnte man ja tatsächlich auf den physischen Ursprung der Minderwertigkeit kommen. Das Mädchen ist zehn Jahre alt, ist also in einem Stadium, von dem ich immer angebe, daß es besonders wichtig ist, wie sich der Erzieher zu einem solchen Kinde verhält.

Nun natürlich hat das Mädchen alle Antezedenzien, die zu diesem Zeitpunkte hinführen, ja verschlafen. Die entzündlichen Erscheinungen in der Nähe der Blasengegend, die ihr Spiegelbild im oberen Organismus haben, die zeigen ja ganz deutlich, daß sich der Ätherleib in dem Organismus nicht in richtiger Weise einlebt, weil das Zusammenarbeiten mit dem Astralleib eben nicht ordentlich stattfinden kann. Sie müssen nun natürlich immer ins Auge fassen, daß alles dasjenige, was so vor sich geht, wenn es sich ausdrückt im seelischen Organismus, daß es dann in der feineren Organisation begründet ist, daß also sozusagen die grobe Organisation nicht auf die Spur führen kann. Natürlich kann man leichter etwas in der oberen Organisation bemerken als in der unteren Organisation. Aber wenn man einem solchen Kinde, dessen ÄÄtherleib durch den defekten Astralleib nicht ordentlich funktioniert, so daß nicht hineindringt in die Organisation dasjenige, was es aufnimmt, wenn man einem solchen Kinde beikommen will, so handelt es sich darum, daß man möglichst das, was Eindruck machen soll auf das Kind, verstärkt, daß man mit starken Eindrücken für ein solches Kind arbeitet. Sie müssen das bedenken: das Gedächtnis hängt ja an einer ordentlichen Organisierung von physischem Leib und Ätherleib. Der Astralleib und das Ich nehmen ja nicht mit dasjenige, was von Eindrücken erinnerungsmäßig festgehalten wird. Träume treten ja auch erst auf, wenn eine teilweise Einlagerung des Astralleibes und des Ich in den physischen und Ätherleib stattfindet. Also für das Ich und die astralische Organisation ist ja eigentlich alles vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen vergessen. Es lagert in dem, was im Bette übrigbleibt. Wenn nun das, was da übrigbleibt, nicht ordentlich organisiert ist, so einverleibt es sich nicht die Reste, die Überbleibsel der Eindrücke, und es wird sich in einem solchen Falle darum handeln, daß man zunächst starke Eindrücke hervorruft, um die obere in der unteren Organisation, ich meine das Ich und den Astralleib im Ätherleib und physischen Leib zur tatkräftigen Wirksamkeit zu bringen.

Nun weiß ich nicht, ob es schon versucht worden ist, sein Gedächtnis nach einfachen Volksmelodien zu prüfen?

Dr. Ilse Knauer: Das geht leichter.

So versuche man einmal auf der Grundlage dieser vorhandenen Eindrucksfähigkeit weiterzuarbeiten, von da ausgehend zum Beispiel die Aufmerksamkeit zu lenken auf solche kleinen Gedichte, in denen ein bestimmtes Motiv nach je drei Zeilen immer wiederkehrt, so daß das Kind einen starken Rhythmuseindruck empfängt und damit dann der Zeitpunkt heranrückt, in dem man auch rhythmenlose Eindrücke an das Kind heranbringen kann. Es ist nicht anzunehmen, daß der Zeitpunkt, in dem man etwas erreichen kann in diesem Falle, kürzer sein wird als drei bis vier Jahre, bis zur Geschlechtsreife. Wenn nach diesen Gesichtspunkten gearbeitet wird bis zu diesem Zeitpunkte, namentlich wo rhythmische Eindrücke wirken können, und von da aus das andere erarbeitet wird, kann man erzieherisch etwas erreichen. Die Therapie haben wir schon festgestellt: es sollte Umschläge bekommen mit Berberis vulgaris zehn Prozent und Heileurythmie LMS-U (Tafel 13).

Sie sehen ja: es ist auch da die Anschauung zugrunde liegend, daß das Gestaltende, das sich Anschmiegende in die Beweglichkeit des Astralleibes hineinkommt, dem M entgegenkommt. DasM ist dasjenige, was, wie ich Ihnen gesagt habe, den ganzen Organismus in die Ausatmung hineinlegt, so daß sich dadurch astralische und ätherische Organisation begegnen sollen. Das S ist dazu da, um den Astralleib in eine starke, lebendige Tätigkeit zu versetzen, aber doch so, daß er an sich hält, und dazu ist dann das U. Diese Dinge ergeben sich dann im unmittelbaren Anblicke, wir rufen sie hier wiederum zurück. Daß das Kind Umschläge mit Berberis vulgaris erhält, das beruht darauf, daß wir nötig haben, die entzündlichen Ursachen zu neutralisieren, und das kann auf diese Weise geschehen.

Dann haben wir gehabt einen sechzehnjährigen Jungen, der Kleptomane war, der genau ein Bild des kleptomanen Knaben abgibt, der hier vorgeführt worden ist. Da haben Sie in der Vorführung das allerbeste Beispiel gehabt. Er ist typisch genau so zu behandeln. Man wird nur sehen müssen, ob die Eindrücke, die man ihm gibt, an dieses oder jenes anknüpfen können. Es kann, je nachdem was die Kinder vorher als Erziehung genossen haben, Verschiedenes sein.

Nun bleibt das Kind aus Stuttgart, das eigentlich ein zappeliges Kind ist. Es ist ein schläfriges, zurückgebliebenes Kind. Es ist noch nicht alt, es hat nicht sprechen gelernt, es ist in alle dem zurückgeblieben, was gerade in der ersten Lebensepoche heranerzogen werden soll. Es ist also sehr leicht zu begreifen, woran es bei diesem Kinde fehlt: es griff nicht hinein in das Imitationsprinzip, es biß nicht an auf das Imitieren. Das heißt mit andern Worten: es kann seine Organe vom Ich und Astralleib aus nicht in Bewegung bringen. Es ist ein außerordentlich liebenswürdiges Kind, aber es kann die Ruhesehnsucht seines physischen Leibes eigentlich außerordentlich schwer überwinden. Nun wird das Kind so behandelt werden müssen, daß es zunächst einmal Toneurythmie treibt. So wird es vorwärtsgebracht werden können. Ich kann nur das Ideale an der Sache angeben. Wenn es in ordentlicher Weise Toneurythmie treibt, so kann es zunächst dahin kommen, daß es in seinem Astralleib so angeregt wird, daß der Rhythmus dann den Ätherleib ergreift.

Dann handelt es sich darum, daß man das Kind nachsprechen läßt rhythmische Sätze, so daß das Kind wirklich in den Ton hineinfällt: «Und es wallet und woget und brauset und zischt.» Nun handelt es sich darum, daß man so etwas: «Und es wallet...» mit dem Kinde sachgemäß langsam durchnimmt, langsam hin und rückwärts. Ich sage in diesem Falle absichtlich «wallet» statt «siedet», weil es zu therapeutischem Zwecke verwendet wird. Immer so langsam vor- und rückwärts. Und womöglich macht man das jetzt auch bei folgendem Lautzusammenhang. Das Kind ist innerlich aufzuwecken auf diese Weise, daß wir es in die Verwunderung bringen: A intonieren lassen, dann E I, dann zurück IEA-AEI-IEA und so weiter. So weckt man solch ein Kind allmählich auf, und es wird da doch durch das Nachahmungsprinzip wiederholen. Sie müssen nur das Kind einzeln vornehmen und danach trachten, daß in alledem, was Sie durchnehmen, Imitation liegt, immer das Kind in einem kurzen Zeitpunkt nachintonieren lassen.

Dann würde es sich darum handeln, daß man bei diesem Kinde auch therapeutisch vorgeht, und zwar so, daß man zusammenwirken läßt ein Auseinandertreibendes, etwas, was die Substantialität des Organismus in den Umfang treibt, ein Zentrifugales — das ist immer die Hypophyse, aber das Kind ist ja eigentlich nicht so, daß man Hypophyse auf es anwenden muß, wie man sie anwendet, wenn man es zu tun hat mit rachitischen Kindern, bei denen man mit der Hypophyse auf das Auseinandergehen wirken will, sondern es handelt sich darum, daß man auch das gegenteilige Prinzip, das Zentripetale, in Anwendung bringt, was mit der Hypophyse zusammen die Tendenz hat, den menschlichen Organismus aus dem Substantiellen heraus aufzubauen, und das ist entweder Carbo vegetabilis oder Carbo animalis. Es würde sich darum handeln, Carbo animalis anzuwenden und dieses zu alternieren, so daß man das Formprinzip in der Carbo animalis hat, und das andere Mal das Organisationsprinzip, das ins Wachstum schießen läßt, daß man das in der Hypophysis cerebri hat.

Nun natürlich, für den Anfang eines solchen Erziehungsinstitutes ist ja die Hauptsache, daß diejenigen, die daran teilnehmen, alles dasjenige, was sie vornehmen, beobachten. Es handelt sich schon darum, daß man mit einer gewissen inneren Vertrauenskraft die Sache leitet. Sehen Sie, bei diesem Kinde wird das Schlimmste nicht das Kind sein bei dem werden Sie bald Fortschritte bemerken -, aber das Schlimmste sind in einem solchen Fall die Eltern, die Mutter, die ganz gewiß die Meinung hat, daß man schnell Wunder wirken soll. Nun habe ich sogar gehört, daß die Mutter mit will mit dem Kinde,

Zwischenruf: Sie bringt es nur hin.

Nun, das ist schon eine Erleichterung, wenn man die Mutter nicht da Tafel 13 bei hat. Aber jedenfalls muß man in einem solchen Falle mit einer gewissen Zähigkeit sich aufrechterhalten gegen die begreiflichen, aber zuweilen furchtbar unverständigen Forderungen der Eltern, die nicht wissen und auch nicht wissen können, was bei einem solchen Kinde notwendig ist.

Nun, nicht wahr, ist es bei einem solchen Kinde ganz gut, wenn man es auch physisch in jene abwechselnden Lagen bringt, die durch so etwas angedeutet sind wie AEI-IEA und so weiter. Und das können Sie sehr gut dadurch hervorrufen, daß Sie es abwechselnd und verhältnismäßig kurz in mäßig warmes Wasser bringen und dann ihm eine mäßige Dusche geben. Dadurch bringen Sie in Lebendigkeit dasjenige, was in Lebendigkeit kommen soll. Es wird überhaupt, wenn Sie sehen, daß die Abnormität sich in Trägheit auslebt, diese letztere Maßregel immer von einer guten Wirkung sein, nur daß man sie nicht übertreibt. Man darf aber auch keine Angst davor haben, wenn die Kinder unmittelbar, nachdem man begonnen hat mit einer solchen Badekur, etwas aufgeregt werden. Das geht vorüber. Die Reaktion kommt schon, es stellt sich allmählich ins Richtige hinein.

Nun ist noch Kurt H. zu besprechen. Der Kurt H., der sieht alles in Farben. Das ist der Junge, der kein Geld hat-ich habe ihn jetztschon vor mir. Bei diesem Jungen liegt ein Grundphänomen vor, das ist nämlich so: er kann nicht recht an die äußere Welt herankommen, er bleibt in sich stecken. Ich muß Ihnen dieses Phänomen so erklären, daß es ganz plastisch erklärt wird. Er kann nicht hinein in die Außenwelt, dadurch stößt er fortwährend von innen her mit seiner Ich-Organisation an seinen eigenen Astralleib heran und hat eine innere Ungeschicklichkeit dadurch, vielleicht besser gesagt, eine innere Schlampigkeit. Und dieses geht Hand in Hand damit, daß er eine feine Empfindlichkeit entwikkelt bei diesem Anstoßen an seinen Astralleib und daß er dadurch etwas hat von einem feinen Menschen. Das hängt zusammen mit dem Farbensehen. Er sieht sie, weil er wachend in seinem eigenen Astralleib leben kann. Nun ist es so bei ihm, daß er erzogen werden kann nur dadurch, daß man die Dinge, die immer mehr sich ausbilden werden, schaut: eine gewisse leise Sehnsucht nach Idealen, dabei aber wieder ein Zurückzucken, so ein Nicht-Zurechtkommen mit der Welt. Nun wird alles davon abhängen, daß man gerade bei diesem Jungen, der ganz so unterrichtet werden kann, wie die Waldorfschul-Methodik ist, daß man das naturgemäße Vertrauen zu ihm faßt. Es kann eigentlich gerade mit diesem Jungen kaum etwas anderes gemacht werden. Nicht wahr, der Junge hat die Eigentümlichkeit, daß er etwa so schreibt (siehe Tafel 14, links). Nun gehen Sie daran, sorgfältig darauf zu achten, daß der Junge eine fein modellierte Handschrift aus seiner jetzigen herausbekommt, dann werden Sie schon sehen, dann wird er schon in seiner ganzen inneren Konstitution umgewandelt erscheinen. Wenn Renommagebestrebungen auftreten, so versuchen Sie sofort, das aus dem Vertrauen heraus, das er zu Ihnen gewonnen hat, ad absurdum zu führen durch irgend etwas.

Nun sprach ich gestern von den Albinos. Ich führte die Betrachtung so weit, daß ich sagte: Wir müssen nun den kosmischen Impuls finden, der da wirken kann. — Nun, da können wir ja zunächst die Fachpersönlichkeit für solche kosmische Konstellationen einmal fragen, ob ihr bei diesem oder andern Horoskopen etwas Besonderes aufgefallen ist, das diese Albinos gemeinsam hätten.

Zu Dr. Elisabeth Vreede:

Ist Ihnen aufgefallen, daß unter den äußeren Planeten Uranus und Neptun stark hervortreten?

Dr. Elisabeth Vreede: Ja, da sind viele Aspekte. Sonst könnte ich nichts über die Horoskope sagen.

Ich frage absichtlich Sie, weil Sie oftmals nachdenken über Horoskope und eigentlich wahrscheinlich solche Dinge oftmals im Kopfe gehabt haben. Ich habe zunächst von Ihnen nur diese zwei. Da es sich um ein neues Gebiet handelt, ist es das Beste, in dieser Sache ganz heuristisch vorzugehen, Es gibt eine Menge anderer Dinge noch, die in Betracht kommen, aber man hat zunächst zu berücksichtigen das Folgende noch.

Nehmen Sie den Menschen einmal. Wir gliedern ihn ja, indem wir auf diejenige Gliederung schauen, welche mehr vom ätherischen Prinzip aus die ganze Wesenheit organisiert, wir gliedern ihn ja in den physischen Leib, den ätherischen Leib, den Empfindungsleib, den wir in Zusammenhang bringen mit der Empfindungsseele, die Verstandesseele, was die Griechen Krattseele nennen, die Bewußtseinsseele, und hier kommen wir zu Geistselbst, Lebensgeist und Geistesmensch. Nun sehen Sie, wenn man diese Glieder der menschlichen Natur ansieht, so stellen sie sich zunächst heraus als etwas, was in relativer Selbständigkeit betrachtet werden muß und den Menschen zusammensetzt. Aber eigentlich ist die Zusammensetzung bei jedem Menschen eine andere: Der eine hat ein bißchen mehr Kraft im Ätherleib, dafür weniger im physischen Leib, der andere ein bißchen mehr Kraft in der Bewußtseinsseele und so weiter, das hängt zusammen. In alldem steckt dann ja der Mensch mit seiner eigentlichen Individualität drinnen, die durch die wiederholten Erdenleben durchgeht, der diesen ganzen Zusammenhang erst vom Freiheitsprinzip aus in eine individuelle Regulierung bringen muß. Aber dasjenige, was vom Kosmischen herkommt, hängt so am Menschen, daß dem Physischen entspricht die stärkste Sonnenwirkung (siehe Tafel 13), die überhaupt auf die Menschen einen starken Einfluß hat. Dem ätherischen Leibe entsprechen die stärksten Mondwirkungen, dem Empfindungsleib die stärksten Merkurwirkungen, der Empfindungsseele die stärksten Venuswirkungen. Der Verstandesseele entsprechen die stärksten Marswirkungen, der Bewußtseinsseele die Jupiterwirkungen, dem Geistselbst der Saturn. Und das, was heute beim Menschen noch nicht entwickelt ist, das kommt im Uranus und Neptun zur Geltung, das sind ja die Vagabunden, die sich unserem Planetensystem später zugesellt haben, bei ihnen haben wir also die planetarischen Einflüsse zu suchen, die eigentlich unter normalen Verhältnissen auf die Geburtskonstellation nicht einen sehr star ken Einfluß haben.

Geistesmensch ♆ Neptun
Lebensgeist ♅ Uranus
Geistselbst ♄ Saturn
Bewußtseinsseele ♃ Jupiter
Verstandesseele ♂ Mars
Empfindungsseele ♀ Venus
Empfindungsleib ☿ Merkur
Ätherleib ☾ Mond
Physischer Leib ○ Sonne

Nun wissen Sie ja aus andern anthroposophischen Vorträgen, wie stark der Einfluß des Mondes auf dem Umwege durch den menschlichen Ätherleib ist. Er hängt ja zusammen mit dem gesamten Vererbungsprinzip. Er prägt diesem Modell des physischen Leibes von den Eltern aus alle möglichen Kräfte ein. Dieser Mondeinfluß gibt von der frühesten embryonalen Kindheitsentwickelung aus die ganze Richtung eigentlich an.

Nun denken Sie einmal, daß ja beim Menschen eine solche Konstellation da sein kann, daß dieser Impuls vom Monde aus möglichst stark oder wenigstens hinlänglich stark ist, so daß der Mensch etwas mitbekommt auf dem Wege der Vererbung, was ihn gewissermaßen herunterzieht in die Stoffwechselorganisation. Es kann aber auch so sein, daß von den Mondeinflüssen etwas weggerissen wird, daß dasjenige, was nicht will die Mondeinflüsse, was auf der andern Seite liegt, nämlich Uranus und Neptun, daß das heranzieht dasjenige, was eigentlich im Mondbereiche sein soll. Es können auch andere Konstellationen sein. Aber bei diesen Kindern liegt eben diese Konstellation vor, und bei ihnen ist es schon so, daß man an dem, was sich im Horoskop zeigt, sieht, worum es sich handelt.

Nehmen wir das eine Horoskop, dann finden Sie hier — das kann Ihnen aufgefallen sein - Uranus mit Venus und Mars in diesem Bereich. Nicht wahr, Sie brauchen dabei nicht über die Trigonstellung hinauszugehen. Hier finden Sie Mars, Venus und Uranus. Und wenn Sie den Mars nehmen, so steht er hier sogar bei diesem Kinde, das 1909 geboren ist, in vollständiger Opposition zum Monde. Der Mars also, der bei sich hat in der Nähe Venus und Uranus, er steht selber in starker Opposition zum Monde. Hier ist der Mond, da ist der Mars. Der Mars schleppt den Uranus und die Venus in seiner Nähe mit (siehe Tafel 13/14, oben).

Nun mache ich Sie noch auf etwas aufmerksam: Der Mond steht vor der Waage zu gleicher Zeit, hat also durch den Tierkreis einen möglichst geringen Halt, schwankt, ist also selber ein Schwachmatikus in dieser Stunde; sein Einfluß wird ihm aber noch dadurch abgenommen, daß der Mars, der den luziferischen Einfluß mit sich schleppt, mit ihm in Opposition steht.

Jetzt schauen wir uns das Horoskop des jüngeren Kindes an, da haben Sie die Sache so: Sie haben Venus und Uranus und Mars wiederum in einem Gebiete, so daß sie einander nahe liegen, nur diesen Umfang des Himmels umfassen sie. Sie stehen wieder einander nahe. Bei dem einen haben wir gesehen, daß sie in Opposition zum Monde stehen und zugleich, daß der Mond in der Waage steht. Jetzt fassen wir das zweite Horoskop an, da haben wir Mars, Venus, Uranus wiederum in der Nachbarschaft, genau so wie es früher war. Schauen wir nach dem Mars, so finden wir da keine völlige, aber doch schon fast eine Opposition zum Monde. Also das jüngere Kind erreicht nicht eine so völlige Opposition zum Monde, aber es ist eine annähernde Opposition zum Monde da. Aber das Eigentümlichste ist, wenn wir den Mond aufsuchen, so finden wir ihn wiederum in der Waage, fast in Opposition zum Mars, der Uranus und Venus mit sich schleppt. Nun, das ist also wiederum in der Waage. Es muß nicht so sein, aber hier haben Sie auch keine ordentlichen Geburtsdaten. Da ist der Mond in der Waage und hier auch.

Dr. Elisabeth Vreede: Auffällig ist, daß bei beiden dieselbe Konstellation ist zwischen Mond und Neptun.

Das müßte für sich erklärt werden. Horoskope müssen individuell interpretiert werden. Daß hier eine solche Ähnlichkeit herauskommt, ist nicht zu verwundern, das sind ja Geschwister. Daß bei dem älteren Kinde eine stärkere Opposition ist als bei dem jüngeren, das schon beeinflußt ist durch das ältere, ist wiederum nicht verwunderlich. Aber es handelt sich hier darum, daß man eine ganz durchschaubare Konstellation herausbekommt, die, wenn man sie interpretiert, dazu führt: der Mars, der der Träger von Eisen ist, er verselbständigt sich gegenüber dem Fortpflanzungsprinzip, gegenüber dem Mond, bringt vor allen Dingen dasjenige, was dem Menschen schon durch das Venusprinzip zukommt, all das, was zusammenhängt mit der Liebe, das bringt er ab von seiner eigentlichen Aufgabe, reißt es heraus aus der eigentlichen Aufgabe, läßt es nicht in Zusammenhang mit dem, was in der Fortpflanzung ist und dann im Wachstum. Und wir sehen daher dann heraufrücken dasjenige, was im Unterleib leben sollte und im Zusammenhang mit den Wachstumskräften steht, in die Kopforganisation, und finden, daß dadurch im Wachstum drinnen das Eisen fehlen muß, dagegen alles dasjenige, was zusammenhängt mit der Bekämpfung des Eisens, der Sulfur, im Übermaß vorhanden sein muß.

Also man hat es schon zu tun mit einer außerordentlich starken Präponderation des Willens und hat vor allen Dingen darauf zu sehen, daß beim Erziehen die Sinnes-Nervenorganisation, die im ganzen labil ist, möglichst zart behandelt wird. Das beruht eigentlich auf Handgriffen. Man muß bei solchen Kindern die Sinnes-Nervenorganisation ganz zart behandeln, also vor allem versuchen, die Augen nicht für das Lesen und dergleichen anzustrengen, sondern allen Unterricht ohne das Schauen mit den Augen, ohne Lesen zu erteilen. Dagegen die Augen gewöhnen an Farbeindrücke, die schwach voneinander abweichen, namentlich in Übergängen die Regenbogenfarben langsam ineinander übergehen lassen und das Kind durch Blicke folgen lassen. Nun, das wären Maßnahmen, die man ergreifen könnte.

Will man in die Organisation noch therapeutisch eingreifen, dann kann ich bis heute nur dieses sagen, daß nach der Geschlechtsreife die Sachen nicht mehr sehr wirksam sein können. Aber das kann Ihnen einen wichtigen Fingerzeig geben, denn das eine Kind ist 1909, das andere 1921 geboren, und die Wirkungen können hier in ihrer Verschiedenheit gut beobachtet werden. Es wird sich darum handeln, daß man ein solches Kind tatsächlich in starke Eisenstrahlungen von der Stoffwechsel-Gliedmaßenorganisation aus hineinbringt. Diese starke Eisenstrahlung können Sie nur erreichen, wenn Sie Pyrit staubförmig gestalten, diesen Pyrit möglichst aufsickern lassen auf eine Fläche, durch die die Eisenstrahlungen wenig durchgehen, zum Beispiel eine Glasfläche - aber das können Sie nicht verwenden in diesem Falle. So müssen Sie versuchen, ein möglichst fettgetränktes, reines Papier zu verwenden, am besten wäre ein ganz dünnes pergamentartiges Papier, aber es muß dünn sein, daß es sich anschmiegt an den Leib. Das gewöhnliche Leinen-Lumpenpapier ist nicht gut zu verwenden dazu. Darauf müßte man Tannenharz oder so etwas verstreichen und den Staub vom Pyrit darauf sickern lassen. Dadurch wird man das Eisen zur Strahlung nach innen bringen. Das muß man die Beine entlang und auf die Schulterblätter legen und dann versuchen, wiederum einen ziehenden Umschlag, etwa einen Cochleariaumschlag auf die Stirne zu legen. Wenn man es in der Zeit namentlich anwendet auf den Organismus, wo der Zahnwechsel sich vollzieht - wo also ganz starke Strömungen und Gegenströmungen sich vollziehen -, so kann es sein, daß man die Labilität bei einem solchen Kinde durchaus bekämpfen kann.

Das würde eben dasjenige sein, was bei diesen Dingen herauskommt. Aber es muß das Problem selbstverständlich weiter verfolgt werden; denn bis jetzt hat die Welt ja mit Albinos nichts weiter getan, als daß sie in Schaubuden vorgeführt werden, wo sie erklären: Ich bin etwas dick, habe weiße Haare, bei Tag sehe ich nichts, bei Nacht sehe ich besser. - In dieser Form werden die Albinos vorgeführt und man weiß nicht viel, da auf solche Dinge sich die Wissenschaft der Gegenwart nicht einläßt. Sobald man aber darauf kommt, auf solche eklatanten Dinge, wie ich sie angeführt habe, wird schon klar werden, daß der kosmische Einfluß ein sehr starker ist, wenn eine völlige Unregelmäßigkeit in der Zusammenlagerung der Glieder in der menschlichen Organisation auftritt.

Nun bitte ich Sie noch das als Frage zu stellen, was Sie gerne als Frage stellen würden.

Frage: Daß wir in diese Situation gekommen sind, Fragen zu stellen, beruht darauf, daß Dr. Lehrs zu Frau Dr. Wegman ging und namentlich in einer andern Veranlassung fragen wollte. Er hat gefunden, daß die Stimmung der Teilnehmer nicht die richtige sei.

Es ist aber gar nicht nötig, die Zeit damit zu verlieren, daß wir die Sache erörtern, sie liegt viel einfacher. Dr. Lehrs ist zu mir gekommen und hat mir erklärt, daß unter den Lauensteiner Teilnehmern die Stimmung war, sie wollten etwas unternehmen in der anthroposophischen Bewegung, was ein Allererstes darstellt, eine Mission, eine Mission, die erst beginnt, und die damit verbunden sein müßte, daß vor allen Dingen erörtert sein müßten die karmischen Zusammenhänge zwischen denjenigen, die eine solche Sache machen und dergleichen.

Lehrs schüttelt den Kopf.

Nun ja, wollen wir den Hauptwert darauf legen, daß Lehrs sagte: Sie haben die Meinung, daß etwas ganz Grundlegendes beginnen müsse und ich sagte darauf, da wird es sich vor allem darum handeln, daß wirklich gelernt wird, was in diesem Kurs vorkommt. Wenn man nicht zufrieden sein würde mit diesem Kurs und beim Abstrakten stehenbleiben würde, zum Beispiel eine ganz neue Bewegung zu organisieren, dann würde man ja etwas tun, was aus dem, was bei uns längst getrieben worden ist, herauswächst. So würde man vor der Gefahr des Größenwahns stehen. Damit aber die teilweise berechtigten Untergründe recht zur Geltung kommen würden, sagte ich: Sie sollen Fragen stellen. - Das ist doch so, daß Lehrs zu mir kam und sagte, daß dieses grundlegende Neue in der Welt aufsprießen müsse, daß der Lauenstein selber im Mittelpunkt der Welt stehen müsse — das alles hat die Veranlassung dazu gegeben, ist es nicht so? — Na, es ist ja nicht so schlimm. Jetzt ist es am besten, wir stellen konkrete Fragen, und denken über das andere gar nicht nach.

Albrecht Strobschein stellt eine Frage, wie das Lauensteiner Institut zusammenhängt mit der Tatsache, daß Trüper als erster die Erziehung minderwertiger Kinder inauguriert habe?

Was meinen Sie, daß dieser Mann sich mit diesen Kindern zuerst be schäftigt hat? Dasjenige, was da angedeutet wird, das darf nicht auf die Spitze getrieben werden. Das, um was es sich handeln kann bei der Erziehung minderwertiger Kinder: ich glaube nicht, daß die schon verhältnismäßig sehr früh mit gewissem Erfolge aufgetretenen Erziehungsinstitute für minderwertige Kinder in Hannover von diesem Manne beeinflußt gewesen sein können. Die Aufnahme der Erziehung minderwertiger Kinder datiert viel weiter zurück. Dasjenige, was immer gefehlt hat, das ist gerade dasjenige, was möglich macht, in die ganze Wesenheit solcher Kinder hineinzuschauen. Man kommt ja nicht auf die einfachsten Dinge, meine lieben Freunde, wenn man das Anthroposophische bei der Betrachtung nicht hat. Auf der andern Seite liefert gerade der Mensch die allertiefsten Einblicke in die Anthroposophie als solche.

Bedenken Sie doch nur einmal, wenn man heute die Goethesche Metamorphosenlehre ansieht, wie sie durch Goethe hat werden können, der ein gescheiter Mensch war. Sie ist ja eine völlige Abstraktion, wie etwas, das überall Ansätze hat, das aber überall schon dabei stehenbleiben muß, zu zeigen, wie das Blatt in der Blüte lebt, wie sich ein Blütenblatt umwandelt in ein Staubblatt, also eine ganz elementare Metamorphose ins Auge faßt, beim Tier und Menschen dabei stehenbleibt, die Umwandelung der Wirbelknochen in Schädelknochen scheu anzuführen, Überall ist man über das Elementare nicht hinausgegangen. Ich selber war erschüttert, ich sagte mir: Ist denn nicht Goethe aufgegangen — daran krankte ich in den achtziger Jahren -, daß das ganze Gehirn die Umwandelung eines einzigen Gehirnganglions ist? Geistig konnte ich schauen, daß es ihm aufgegangen war. Dann aber fiel mir erst auf seine Zurückhaltung, das auszusagen, was ihm aufgegangen war. Als ich nach Weimar kam, fand ich in einem mit Bleistift geschriebenen Notizbüchlein die Notiz: Das Gehirn ist ein transformiertes Hauptganglion. — Das ist erst in den neunziger Jahren durch meine Bemühungen gedruckt worden. In den neunziger Jahren ist ja plötzlich ein ganz neuer Schriftsteller aufgetreten: Goethe wurde sozusagen der fruchtbarste Schriftsteller am Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts.

Denken Sie nur, welch weiter Weg von der Goetheschen Metamorphosenlehre hin ist zu jener Metamorphosenlehre, die dadurch eintritt, daß Sie hier ein einjähriges normales Kind zu dem metamorphosisch umgebildet finden, was da vor einigen Tagen als Riesenembryo vor Ihnen gelegen hat. Das ist die retardierende Metamorphose, das Zurückhalten des Embryonalzustandes.

Aber das erlangen Sie als Einsicht, meine lieben Freunde, wenn Sie gerade diese Meditation immer wieder und wieder machen, die ich Ihnen gestern gegeben habe, indem ich Ihnen sagte: Hier ist ein Kreis, hier ist ein Punkt, da ist der Kreis Punkt, da ist der Punkt Kreis und so weiter (siehe Tafel 14). Lassen Sie immer wieder und wiederum in Ihrer Meditation den Punkt in den Kreis hineinschlüpfen, den Punkt zum Kreise sich ausdehnen, und spüren Sie dabei das Entstehen der Gliedmaßen-Stoffwechselorganisation aus der Kopforganisation. Bringen Sie es bis dahin, daß Sie den Kopf empfinden, wenn Sie sich sagen: Der Punkt ist Punkt, der Kreis ist Kreis. — Spüren Sie, daß Sie vom Kopf heruntergleiten zum Stoffwechselsystem, wenn Sie sich sagen: Der Punkt ist Kreis, der Kreis ist Punkt —, das Umgekehrte. Dann werden Sie die ausgebildete Metamorphosenlehre darinnen haben und Sie werden sich sagen können: Durch diese ganze Art des Denkens, die hervorruft die Anthroposophie, wird es erst möglich, in die Minderwertigkeit der Kinder eine Anschauung hineinzubringen. Das haben wir in diesen Vorträgen versucht.

Nun ist, wenn man wirken will, nicht gut, sich das Karma so vorzustellen, das man sagt: Da ist ein Engel, der hat den Strohschein hingestellt, der andere Engel hat den Pickert hingesetzt, ein anderer Engel hat den Löffler hingesetzt. Dann hat ein Engel noch die etwas widerspenstige Dr. Knauer hingesetzt, ein besonders gütiger Engel hat dann noch das Fräulein Becker hineingebracht, wir fühlen uns von fünf Engeln so zusammengesetzt. — Das ist, wenn man wirken will, gar nicht die richtige Auffassung von Karma, in die man eintreten soll. Sondern die richtige Auffassung ist diese, daß man eben aufsucht die Enthusiasmusimpulse, die auf das fortwirkende Karma hinzielen. Da können Sie die Frage stellen: Welche Antezedenzien sind in Jena da, die wir aufgreifen können, an die wir uns anschließen können? - Denn natürlich, wenn man in ein möbliertes Haus einzieht, so wird man nicht die Möbel alle herausschmeißen, sondern man wird in manchen Fällen, wenn es geht - und hier geht es - sich fragen: Wie benutzt man dasjenige, was schon drin ist? - Und so kann es auch nur sein, daß Sie sich fragen: Wie benutzt man dasjenige, was schon drin ist?

Nun wissen Sie, daß in Jena die Merkwürdigkeit vorliegt, daß aus ganz ähnlichen Jugendveranlagungen heraus, aus religiös-spirituellen Tendenzen — aber das Spirituelle methodisch vorstellenden Lebenstendenzen - sich einmal der deutsche Abt Hildebrand wandte nach Rom und der Papst Gregor der Siebente wurde, daß er von Rom aus einen starken Einfluß nach der Richtung hin nahm, von der aus alles organisiert wurde. Wir haben da einen starken römischen Impuls, der sich von Rom nach Europa ergießt, durch den ins Römische umgesetzten Cluniazenser-Impuls. Das studieren Sie einmal. Das Merkwürdige ist dies, daß diese selbe Individualität im darauffolgenden Leben getrieben wird nach Jena und als Ernst Haeckel wieder erscheint. Das ist gerade so, als wenn im Menschen selber die Abbauprinzipien in regulärer Weise eingreifen in die Aufbauprinzipien. Dadurch haben Sie in diesem Jena eine Strahlung, die entgegenläuft ganz klar der römischen Strömung. Den Begegnungspunkt haben Sie da (siehe Tafel 14, unten).

Und als Ernst Haeckel bei seinem sechzigsten Geburtstag in Jena gesprochen hat, zunächst im Zoologischen Institut, konnte man den Eindruck haben, daß der alte Hildebrand aufgestanden ist. Er hatte ganz dieselbe Sprechweise, er redete ganz wie dieser: mit leise umflorter Stimme, die Worte immer so wägend wie jemand, der, trotzdem er viel gesprochen hat, doch noch immer des Sprechens nicht ganz mächtig ist. Und das Kuriose ist: der Abt Hildebrand, der ja nur die Miene des strengen Papstes hatte — er zeigte einfach das Organ der Kirche -, er hatte die Eigentümlichkeit, daß er gern Dinge erzählte, bei denen die andern nicht so stark, aber doch recht wohlgefällig lächelten. Es war nun wunderschön, wie Haeckel in die Stimmung verfiel beim Diner, gerade die Schnurren aus seinem Leben zu erzählen zwischen den einzelnen Gängen, die den andern die Zunge lösten und sie zum Lächeln brachten. Es ist so, daß er dazumal durch sein ganzes Verhalten als Sechzigjähriger kindlich lächelnd, herausfordernd, die andern alle aus dem Konzept brachte. Ich erinnere mich noch, wie drollig es war, als Oscar Hertwig seine Rede nun in hochschwangerem Zustande trug und sie nicht gebären konnte, während Haeckel noch immer Schnurren erzählte.

Ja, das ist nun so, daß ich meine, daß Sie aus diesem, was ich für eine gewisse esoterische Unterlage gegeben habe, noch etwas Besonderes dadurch erreichen könnten, daß Sie sich die Rede beschaffen würden, die Haeckel gehalten hat im Zoologischen Institut bei seinem sechzigsten Geburtstag. Sie war nicht lang, aber sie war persönlich und hat etwas außerordentlich Objektives. Und dann stellen Sie dagegen die Rede, die der Professor Gärtner gehalten hat, der durchaus die Tendenz hatte, Haeckel nicht als etwas, was in der Weltgeschichte irgend etwas bedeutet, gelten zu lassen, der ausdrücklich sagte, das ist etwas, was wir außer acht lassen, der immer mit Wohlbehagen nur sprach nicht von Haeckel als vom Schöpfer der «Natürlichen Schöpfungsgeschichte», sondern der ausdrücklich sagte: Das ist etwas, was wir außer acht lassen können, aber wir wollen hervorheben, wieviel Vorträge der Kollege Haeckel gehalten hat, daß er mehr Vorträge gehalten hat, als alle andern zusammen, was sich sonderbar ausnimmt, daß die andern Kollegen so wenig Vorträge gehalten haben, daß dasjenige, was Haeckel gemacht hat, nicht zusammen gekriegt würde von der ganzen Jenaer Medizinisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft! -— Er war ein philiströser Knopf. Es war urkomisch, diese Rede da einschlagen zu hören von diesem Mann. Wenn Sie Haeckels Rede nehmen, so haben Sie so etwas frisch Lebendiges, dann kommt hereingetragen das Schafott, dann kommt der Kollege Gärtner und köpft. Und der Physiologe, der ein katholischer Kleriker war, schaut betrübt zu, denn teilnehmen mußten sie alle. Aber da drin den Haeckel zu sehen, wie er verjugendlichend wirkte! Es war auch die Studentenschaft an diesem Tage geistreich geworden. Man sah sehr viele, und die Studenten waren merkwürdig imaginativ. Verschaffen Sie sich doch nur einmal ein Büchelchen, wo all die Lieder drinnen stehen, die alle gesungen worden sind im Laufe dieses Tages, wie da vorkommt in kauziger Weise, wie ein Archäopteryx an einer Kirchturmspitze seinen Schnabel wetzt — und stellen Sie sich dabei vor all das jugendfrische Leben. Das ist wieder zur Meditation zu empfehlen, dann stehen Sie darin in dem, wie Jena dasteht in der europäischen Geistesentwickelung. - Nun werde ich, damit die Sache einen Abschluß hat, morgen um neun Uhr den letzten Vortrag vor Ihnen halten.

Eleventh Lecture

Now let us discuss the cases that were not mentioned yesterday. There was also a younger girl, aged ten, who suffered from memory loss. She is only in the second grade. She has growths in her nasopharyngeal cavity; this is related to excessive etheric growth in the bladder area, which is reflected in her head. In this girl's case, it was indeed possible to identify the physical origin of her inferiority. The girl is ten years old, which is a stage of life that I always emphasize as being particularly important in terms of how educators behave toward such children.

Now, of course, the girl has slept through all the antecedents that lead up to this point. The inflammatory symptoms near the bladder area, which are mirrored in the upper organism, clearly show that the etheric body is not integrating properly into the organism because it cannot work together with the astral body in the right way. Of course, you must always bear in mind that everything that happens when it expresses itself in the soul organism is rooted in the finer organization, so that the gross organization, so to speak, cannot lead you to the source. Naturally, it is easier to notice something in the upper organization than in the lower organization. But if you want to help such a child, whose etheric body does not function properly due to the defective astral body, so that what it takes in does not penetrate into the organization, then it is a matter of strengthening as much as possible what is supposed to make an impression on the child, of working with strong impressions for such a child. You must bear in mind that memory depends on the proper organization of the physical body and etheric body. The astral body and the ego do not take in what is retained in memory from impressions. Dreams only occur when the astral body and the ego are partially stored in the physical and etheric bodies. So for the ego and the astral organization, everything from falling asleep to waking up is actually forgotten. It is stored in what remains in bed. If what remains there is not properly organized, it does not incorporate the remnants, the leftovers of the impressions, and in such a case it will be necessary to first evoke strong impressions in order to bring the upper organization, that is, the I and the astral body in the etheric body and physical body, into active effectiveness.

Now, I don't know if anyone has already tried testing his memory with simple folk melodies?

Dr. Ilse Knauer: That's easier.

So try to continue working on the basis of this existing receptivity, starting from there, for example, directing attention to short poems in which a certain motif recurs every three lines, so that the child receives a strong rhythmic impression and then the time approaches when you can also introduce the child to impressions without rhythm. It is unlikely that the time it takes to achieve something in this case will be less than three to four years, until sexual maturity. If we work according to these principles up to this point, namely where rhythmic impressions can have an effect, and build on this to develop other aspects, we can achieve something in terms of education. We have already determined the therapy: the child should receive compresses with 10% Berberis vulgaris and curative eurythmy LMS-U (Table 13).

As you can see, the underlying view here is that the formative, the clinging, enters into the mobility of the astral body and meets the M. The M is what, as I have told you, places the whole organism into exhalation, so that the astral and etheric organizations should meet. The S is there to set the astral body in motion with a strong, lively activity, but in such a way that it remains intact, and that is what the U is for. These things then become apparent at first glance; we recall them here again. The fact that the child receives compresses with Berberis vulgaris is based on the fact that we need to neutralize the inflammatory causes, and this can be done in this way.

Then we had a sixteen-year-old boy who was a kleptomaniac, who is exactly like the kleptomaniac boy who was presented here. You saw the very best example of this in the presentation. He is to be treated in exactly the same way. We will just have to see whether the impressions we give him can be linked to this or that. It may vary, depending on what the children have previously received in terms of education.

Now there remains the child from Stuttgart, who is actually a fidgety child. He is a sleepy, retarded child. He is not yet old, he has not learned to speak, he is retarded in everything that should be taught in the first stage of life. So it is very easy to understand what this child is lacking: it did not grasp the principle of imitation, it did not take to imitation. In other words, it cannot set its organs in motion from its ego and astral body. It is an extremely lovable child, but it finds it extremely difficult to overcome its physical body's longing for rest. Now the child will have to be treated in such a way that it first of all does eurythmy. In this way it will be able to progress. I can only indicate the ideal in this matter. If it does eurythmy in the proper way, it can first of all come to the point where it is so stimulated in its astral body that the rhythm then takes hold of the etheric body.

Then it is a matter of having the child repeat rhythmic sentences so that the child really falls into the sound: “And it billows and surges and roars and hisses.” Now it is a matter of going through something like this: “And it billows...” with the child at an appropriate slow pace, slowly back and forth. In this case, I deliberately say “surges” instead of “boils” because it is used for therapeutic purposes. Always slowly back and forth. And if possible, do the same with the following sound sequence. The child must be awakened internally in such a way that we bring it into a state of wonder: Let them intonate A, then E I, then back IEA-AEI-IEA and so on. This is how you gradually awaken such a child, and they will repeat it through the principle of imitation. You just have to take the child individually and strive to ensure that there is imitation in everything you go through, always letting the child intonate again after a short time.

Then it would be a matter of taking a therapeutic approach with this child, namely by allowing a dispersing force to interact, something that drives the substantiality of the organism into the periphery, a centrifugal force — this is always the pituitary gland, but the child is not actually in such a state that the pituitary gland needs to be applied to it in the way it is applied when dealing with rachitic children, in whom one wants to use the pituitary gland to counteract the dispersal, but rather that one also applies the opposite principle, the centripetal, which, together with the pituitary gland, has the tendency to build up the human organism from the substantial, and that is either Carbo vegetabilis or Carbo animalis. It would be a matter of applying Carbo animalis and alternating it, so that one has the form principle in Carbo animalis, and the other time the organizational principle, which causes growth, so that one has that in the pituitary gland.

Now, of course, for the beginning of such an educational institution, the main thing is that those who participate in it observe everything they do. It is a matter of leading the matter with a certain inner confidence. You see, in this child's case, the worst thing will not be the child—you will soon notice progress there—but the worst thing in such a case is the parents, the mother, who is quite certain that miracles should be performed quickly. Now I have even heard that the mother wants to go with the child,

Interjection: She's just bringing it along.

Well, it's a relief not to have the mother there. But in any case, in such a case, one must maintain a certain tenacity against the understandable but sometimes terribly unreasonable demands of parents who do not know and cannot know what is necessary for such a child.

Well, isn't it quite good for such a child to be physically placed in those alternating positions indicated by something like AEI-IEA and so on. And you can achieve this very well by placing the child alternately and relatively briefly in moderately warm water and then giving them a moderate shower. In this way, you bring to life what should come to life. If you see that the abnormality is manifesting itself in sluggishness, this latter measure will always have a good effect, provided that it is not exaggerated. However, you should not be afraid if the children become a little excited immediately after you have started such a bathing cure. This will pass. The reaction will come, and things will gradually fall into place.

Now we must discuss Kurt H. Kurt H., who sees everything in colors. He is the boy who has no money—I can see him standing before me now. This boy has a fundamental problem, which is that he cannot really connect with the outside world; he remains stuck inside himself. I must explain this phenomenon to you in a way that is very vivid. He cannot enter the outside world, so he constantly collides with his own astral body from within with his ego organization and has an inner clumsiness, or perhaps better said, an inner sloppiness. And this goes hand in hand with the fact that he develops a fine sensitivity when colliding with his astral body and that he thereby has something of a refined human being about him. This is connected with his ability to see colors. He sees them because he can live awake in his own astral body. Now, in his case, he can only be educated by looking at the things that will increasingly develop: a certain quiet longing for ideals, but at the same time a shrinking back, a kind of inability to cope with the world. Now everything will depend on whether, especially with this boy, who can be taught entirely according to the Waldorf school method, one can develop a natural trust in him. There is really little else that can be done with this boy. You see, the boy has the peculiarity of writing something like this (see plate 14, left). Now you must take care to ensure that the boy develops a finely modeled handwriting from his current one, and then you will see that his entire inner constitution will appear transformed. If he attempts to rename things, immediately try to reduce this to absurdity through something, based on the trust he has gained in you.

Yesterday I spoke about albinos. I took the observation so far as to say: We must now find the cosmic impulse that can have an effect here. — Well, we can start by asking the expert on such cosmic constellations whether they have noticed anything special in this or other horoscopes that these albinos have in common.

To Dr. Elisabeth Vreede:

Have you noticed that Uranus and Neptune stand out strongly among the outer planets?

Dr. Elisabeth Vreede: Yes, there are many aspects. Otherwise, I couldn't say anything about the horoscopes.

I am deliberately asking you because you often think about horoscopes and have probably often had such things in mind. For now, I only have these two from you. Since this is a new field, it is best to proceed heuristically in this matter. There are a lot of other things to consider, but first we must take the following into account.

Take human beings, for example. We divide them by looking at the structure that organizes the whole being more from the etheric principle, We divide them into the physical body, the etheric body, the sentient body, which we associate with the sentient soul, the intellectual soul, what the Greeks call the Kratt soul, the conscious soul, and here we come to the spirit self, the life spirit, and the spirit human. Now, when we look at these members of human nature, they initially appear to be something that must be regarded as relatively independent and that make up the human being. But actually, the composition is different for each person: one has a little more strength in the etheric body, but less in the physical body; another has a little more strength in the consciousness soul, and so on; it all hangs together. In all this, then, is the human being with his or her actual individuality, which passes through repeated earthly lives and must first bring this whole connection into individual regulation based on the principle of freedom. But that which comes from the cosmic realm is so attached to the human being that the strongest solar influence (see Plate 13), which has a powerful effect on human beings, corresponds to the physical body. The strongest lunar influences correspond to the etheric body, the strongest mercurial influences to the sentient body, and the strongest Venusian influences to the sentient soul. The strongest Martian influences correspond to the intellectual soul, the Jupiterian influences to the consciousness soul, and Saturn to the spirit self. And that which is not yet developed in humans today comes to the fore in Uranus and Neptune, which are the vagabonds that joined our planetary system later. It is in them that we must seek the planetary influences that, under normal circumstances, do not have a very strong influence on the birth constellation.

Spirit man ♆ Neptune
Life spirit ♅ Uranus
Spirit self ♄ Saturn
Consciousness soul ♃ Jupiter
Intellectual soul ♂ Mars
Sentient Soul ♀ Venus
Sentient Body ☿ Mercury
Etheric Body ☾ Moon
Physical Body ○ Sun

Now you know from other anthroposophical lectures how strong the influence of the moon is through the human etheric body. It is connected with the entire principle of heredity. It imprints all kinds of forces on this model of the physical body from the parents. This influence of the moon actually determines the entire direction from the earliest embryonic childhood development.

Now consider that there may be a constellation in humans such that this impulse from the moon is as strong as possible, or at least sufficiently strong, so that humans inherit something that, in a sense, pulls them down into the metabolic organization. But it may also be that something is torn away from the moon's influences, that what does not want the moon's influences, what lies on the other side, namely Uranus and Neptune, draws in what should actually be in the moon's sphere. There may also be other constellations. But these children have this constellation, and in their case, you can see from what is shown in the horoscope what it is all about.

If we take this horoscope, you will find here—as you may have noticed—Uranus with Venus and Mars in this area. You don't need to go beyond the trine position. Here you will find Mars, Venus, and Uranus. And if you take Mars, it is even in complete opposition to the moon in this child, who was born in 1909. Mars, which has Venus and Uranus near it, is itself in strong opposition to the Moon. Here is the Moon, there is Mars. Mars drags Uranus and Venus along with it (see plate 13/14, above).

Now I would like to draw your attention to something else: the Moon is in front of Libra at the same time, so it has as little hold as possible on the zodiac, fluctuates, and is therefore itself weak at this hour; but its influence is further diminished by the fact that Mars, which carries the Luciferic influence with it, is in opposition to it.

Now let's look at the horoscope of the younger child, where you have Venus, Uranus, and Mars again in one area, so that they are close to each other, encompassing only this part of the sky. They are close to each other again. In the first case, we saw that they are in opposition to the Moon and, at the same time, that the Moon is in Libra. Now let's look at the second horoscope, where we again have Mars, Venus, and Uranus in close proximity, just as before. If we look at Mars, we find that it is not in complete opposition to the Moon, but almost. So the younger child does not achieve complete opposition to the Moon, but there is an approximate opposition to the Moon. But the most peculiar thing is that when we look for the Moon, we find it again in Libra, almost in opposition to Mars, which is accompanied by Uranus and Venus. So, this is again in Libra. It does not have to be this way, but here you also do not have proper birth data. The Moon is in Libra here as well.

Dr. Elisabeth Vreede: It is striking that both have the same constellation between the Moon and Neptune.

That would have to be explained separately. Horoscopes must be interpreted individually. It is not surprising that such a similarity emerges here, as they are siblings. It is also not surprising that the older child has a stronger opposition than the younger one, who is already influenced by the older one. But the point here is that we have a very transparent constellation which, when interpreted, leads to the following conclusion: Mars, the bearer of iron, becomes independent of the principle of procreation, of the moon, and above all brings that which already belongs to man through the principle of Venus, everything that is connected with love. He takes this away from its actual task, tears it out of its actual task, and does not allow it to be connected with what is in procreation and then in growth. And so we see what should live in the lower abdomen and is connected with the forces of growth moving up into the head organization, and we find that as a result, iron must be lacking in growth, while everything connected with the fight against iron, sulfur, must be present in excess.

So we are dealing with an extraordinarily strong preponderance of the will, and above all we must ensure that the sensory-nervous system, which is unstable as a whole, is treated as gently as possible during education. This is actually based on manual techniques. With such children, the sensory-nervous system must be treated very gently, so above all, one must try not to strain the eyes for reading and the like, but to teach without looking with the eyes, without reading. On the other hand, the eyes should be accustomed to color impressions that differ slightly from one another, namely by allowing the colors of the rainbow to slowly merge into one another in transitions and letting the child follow them with their gaze. Well, those would be measures that could be taken.

If one wants to intervene therapeutically in the organization, then I can only say to this day that after puberty, these things can no longer be very effective. But that can give you an important clue, because one child was born in 1909 and the other in 1921, and the effects can be clearly observed here in their diversity. The aim will be to actually expose such a child to strong iron radiation from the metabolic-limb organization. You can only achieve this strong iron radiation if you turn pyrite into dust and allow this pyrite to seep as much as possible onto a surface through which the iron radiation can pass with little difficulty, for example a glass surface – but you cannot use that in this case. So you must try to use pure paper that is as greasy as possible, preferably very thin parchment-like paper, but it must be thin enough to cling to the body. Ordinary linen rag paper is not suitable for this purpose. You would have to spread fir resin or something similar on it and let the dust from the pyrite seep onto it. This will bring the iron to the inside for radiation. You have to place it along the legs and on the shoulder blades and then try to put a pulling poultice, such as a cochlearia poultice, on the forehead. If you apply it specifically to the organism during the period when the teeth are changing – when there are very strong currents and countercurrents – it may be possible to combat the instability in such a child.

That would be the outcome of these things. But of course the problem must be pursued further, because until now the world has done nothing with albinos except put them on display in show booths, where they explain: I am a little fat, I have white hair, I cannot see anything during the day, but I see better at night. Albinos are presented in this way, and not much is known about them because contemporary science does not concern itself with such matters. However, as soon as one considers such striking things as I have mentioned, it becomes clear that the cosmic influence is very strong when a complete irregularity occurs in the arrangement of the limbs in the human organism.

Now I ask you to ask whatever question you would like to ask.

Question: The reason we have come to this situation of asking questions is that Dr. Lehrs went to Dr. Wegman and wanted to ask questions on another occasion. He found that the mood of the participants was not right.

However, there is no need to waste time discussing the matter; it is much simpler than that. Dr. Lehrs came to me and explained that the mood among the Lauenstein participants was that they wanted to undertake something in the anthroposophical movement that was a first, a mission, a mission that was just beginning, and that this would require, above all, a discussion of the karmic connections between those who do such things and the like.

Lehrs shakes his head.

Well, let's focus on the main point that Lehrs said: They believe that something very fundamental must begin, and I replied that the main thing will be to really learn what is taught in this course. If one were not satisfied with this course and were to remain at the abstract level, for example, organizing a completely new movement, then one would be doing something that grows out of what we have long been doing. One would thus face the danger of megalomania. But in order for the partially justified underlying motives to come into their own, I said: You should ask questions. It's true that Lehrs came to me and said that this fundamental new thing had to sprout in the world, that Lauenstein itself had to be at the center of the world—all of that gave rise to this, didn't it? Well, it's not so bad. Now it's best that we ask concrete questions and don't think about the other stuff at all.

Albrecht Strobschein asks how the Lauenstein Institute is connected to the fact that Trüper was the first to inaugurate the education of inferior children?

What do you mean, that this man was the first to deal with these children? What is being implied here must not be taken to extremes. What the education of inferior children may involve: I do not believe that the educational institutions for inferior children in Hanover, which appeared relatively early on with some success, could have been influenced by this man. The acceptance of the education of inferior children dates back much further. What has always been missing is precisely what makes it possible to see into the whole essence of such children. You don't come up with the simplest things, my dear friends, if you don't have anthroposophy in your view. On the other hand, it is precisely the human being who provides the deepest insights into anthroposophy as such.

Just consider, when we look at Goethe's theory of metamorphosis today, how it could have come about through Goethe, who was an intelligent person. It is, of course, a complete abstraction, like something that has beginnings everywhere but must stop everywhere, showing how the leaf lives in the flower, how a petal transforms into a stamen, thus contemplating a very elementary metamorphosis, stopping at animals and humans, timidly mentioning the transformation of the vertebrae into skull bones, Everywhere, people have not gone beyond the elementary. I myself was shaken, I said to myself: Did Goethe not realize—this was what troubled me in the 1980s—that the entire brain is the transformation of a single brain ganglion? Intellectually, I could see that he had realized this. But then I noticed his reluctance to say what he had realized. When I came to Weimar, I found a note written in pencil in a little notebook: The brain is a transformed main ganglion. — This was only printed in the 1990s through my efforts. In the 1990s, a whole new writer suddenly appeared: Goethe became, so to speak, the most prolific writer at the end of the 19th century.

Just think how far we have come from Goethe's theory of metamorphosis to the theory of metamorphosis that occurs when you find a one-year-old normal child metamorphosed into what was lying in front of you a few days ago as a giant embryo. This is retarded metamorphosis, the retention of the embryonic state.

But you will gain this insight, my dear friends, if you repeat again and again the meditation I gave you yesterday, when I said to you: Here is a circle, here is a point, there is the circle point, there is the point circle, and so on (see plate 14). In your meditation, let the point slip into the circle again and again, let the point expand into a circle, and feel the emergence of the limb-metabolic organization from the head organization. Bring it to the point where you feel the head when you say to yourself: The point is a point, the circle is a circle. Feel yourself sliding down from the head to the metabolic system when you say to yourself: The point is a circle, the circle is a point — the reverse. Then you will have the developed teaching of metamorphosis within you and you will be able to say to yourself: It is only through this whole way of thinking, which brings forth anthroposophy, that it becomes possible to bring a vision into the inferiority of children. We have attempted to do this in these lectures.

Now, if you want to be effective, it is not good to imagine karma in such a way that you say: There is an angel who has placed the straw cake, another angel has placed the pickert, and another angel has placed the spoon. Then another angel placed the somewhat rebellious Dr. Knauer, and a particularly kind angel brought in Miss Becker. We feel that we have been put together by five angels. If you want to be effective, this is not the right view of karma to adopt. The correct view is that one should seek out the impulses of enthusiasm that are aimed at continuing karma. You may ask: What antecedents are there in Jena that we can take up, that we can connect with? For, of course, when you move into a furnished house, you don't throw out all the furniture, but in some cases, if possible — and here it is possible — you ask yourself: How can I use what is already there? And so it can only be that you ask yourself: How can I use what is already there?

Now you know that there is a peculiarity in Jena, that out of very similar youthful dispositions, out of religious-spiritual tendencies — but life tendencies that methodically represent the spiritual — the German abbot Hildebrand once turned to Rome and became Pope Gregory VII, exerting a strong influence from Rome in the direction from which everything was organized. We have a strong Roman impulse here, which flows from Rome to Europe through the Cluniac impulse translated into Roman terms. Study that sometime. The remarkable thing is that this same individuality is driven to Jena in the following life and reappears as Ernst Haeckel. It is as if the principles of destruction intervene in the principles of construction in a regular manner within the human being himself. As a result, you have a radiance in Jena that clearly runs counter to the Roman current. You have the meeting point there (see plate 14, below).

And when Ernst Haeckel spoke in Jena on his sixtieth birthday, first at the Zoological Institute, one could have the impression that old Hildebrand had risen. He had exactly the same way of speaking, he spoke just like him: with a softly veiled voice, always weighing his words like someone who, despite having spoken a lot, is still not quite fluent in speech. And the curious thing is: Abbot Hildebrand, who only had the stern expression of the pope—he simply represented the voice of the church—had the peculiarity of liking to tell stories that made others smile not so strongly, but quite pleasantly. It was wonderful how Haeckel got into the mood at dinner, telling anecdotes from his life between courses, which loosened the tongues of the others and made them smile. The fact is that at that time, his whole demeanor as a sixty-year-old, smiling childishly and provocatively, threw everyone else off balance. I still remember how funny it was when Oscar Hertwig gave her speech while heavily pregnant and unable to give birth, while Haeckel continued to tell anecdotes.

Yes, I believe that you could achieve something special from this, which I have given as a kind of esoteric basis, by obtaining the speech that Haeckel gave at the Zoological Institute on his sixtieth birthday. It was not long, but it was personal and has something extraordinarily objective about it. And then you contrast it with the speech given by Professor Gärtner, who had a definite tendency not to regard Haeckel as someone who meant anything in world history, who explicitly said that this was something we should disregard, who always spoke with pleasure not of Haeckel as the creator of the “Natural History of Creation,” but who explicitly said: This is something we can disregard, but we want to emphasize how many lectures our colleague Haeckel has given, that he has given more lectures than all the others combined, which seems strange, that the other colleagues have given so few lectures that what Haeckel has done could not be matched by the entire Jena Medical and Natural Science Society! — He was a philistine. It was hilarious to hear this speech from this man. If you take Haeckel's speech, you have something fresh and lively, then the scaffold is brought in, then colleague Gärtner comes and beheads him. And the physiologist, who was a Catholic cleric, looks on sadly, because they all had to participate. But to see Haeckel in there, looking so youthful! The student body had also become witty that day. There were many of them, and the students were remarkably imaginative. Just get yourself a little book containing all the songs that were sung during the course of that day, as they appear in a quaint way, like an archaeopteryx sharpening its beak on a church spire—and imagine all that youthful, fresh life. This is again recommended for meditation, then you will understand how Jena stands in the development of European intellectual life. Now, in order to bring this matter to a conclusion, I will give the last lecture to you tomorrow at nine o'clock.