Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

DONATE

Reincarnation and Immortality
GA 80a

24 January 1922, Elberfeld

IV. The Nature of Anthroposophy

It is often said today that when man's spiritual life is in a confused, chaotic condition and human souls have lost their courage, their confidence, and their hope for the future, then all kinds of occult and mystical endeavors are likely to spring up. And in circles which are not inclined to make exact distinctions, Anthroposophy is often reckoned among such endeavors. This evening's subject, which concerns the nature of Anthroposophy, is intended to show you how little it is justified to confuse anthroposophical research with much else with which it is often confused today. Anthroposophy starts from that scientific seriousness and conscientious exactitude which have been developed particularly in the natural sciences in the course of recent centuries and especially in the nineteenth century. Anthroposophy, however, seeks to develop what can be achieved within certain limits by natural science, up to what can be called the supersensory worlds, up to the comprehension of those fundamental riddles with which the deepest longings of the human soul are concerned, the longing for the comprehension of the eternal in the human soul and of the relation of this soul to the divine, spiritual foundations of existence.

Although Anthroposophy begins from scientific foundations, it had to develop—since it is concerned with these comprehensive problems which concern all human beings—in such a way that it comes to meet the understanding of the simplest human heart, and the practical needs of human souls and spirits at the present time, when there is so much need for inner steadiness and certainty, for strength in action, and for faith in mankind and its destiny. Anthroposophy had to come to meet varied social and religious endeavors in the way that I will describe this evening, although having itself a thoroughly scientific origin. But Anthroposophy must take more seriously than do many who believe that they are standing on the firm basis of present-day scientific research, the possibilities which this research leaves open. Anthroposophy has to contemplate with particular attentiveness what are regarded by some careful thinkers today as the limits of science.

If we use the methods of scientific research, observation of the sense world, experiment, and thought, which combines the results of observation and experiment, and find in this way the laws of nature as we are accustomed to regard them, we easily come to the conviction that this research has its limits. It cannot reach beyond the world of the senses and its laws, and cannot comprehend more of the human being than that part of it which belongs to this sense world as the human physical, bodily nature. It has to accept that it has limits as far as the real value, dignity, and being of man are concerned, and that it cannot penetrate the real soul and spirit of man. Anthroposophy, if it seeks to be taken seriously, has to take conscientious account of these things. It has to see this danger seriously: one may not arbitrarily extend that thinking which has been acquired in natural science, beyond the sense world. It would be arbitrary to do so because this manner of thought has acquired its strength and its training through the use of the senses and at once becomes empty, vague and unsatisfactory if it attempts by itself to penetrate to regions which are beyond the sense world. You know that there are certain philosophical speculations, through which thought by itself attempts to go from the sense-given data to the supersensory. Such thinking, relying upon itself alone, attempts to make all sorts of logical inferences which lead from the temporal to the eternal. But anyone who in an unprejudiced way makes the attempt to satisfy the needs of his soul for a knowledge of the eternal through such logical inferences will soon be dissatisfied, for he will recognize that this thinking, which can observe the beings and phenomena of nature so confidently, must at once lose its confidence when it leaves the realms accessible to the senses. Hence the conflict of different philosophical systems; each chooses according to its subjective peculiarities the way in which it leads beyond the world of the senses and develops its own theory. No harmonious, satisfactory conception of the world can come about in this way. Anthroposophy has to see clearly how an unprejudiced mind must regard such ways of thought, which rely upon themselves alone. Here it sees one danger which must be overcome if the eternal in man and in the universe is to be truly known.

Thus Anthroposophy recognizes the limits set to our knowledge of nature, and it must recognize on the other hand how some more far-reaching minds look elsewhere for the help in answering the great riddles of existence, which natural science cannot give them. They turn to what is called mysticism or inner contemplation, where the soul seeks to turn and to descend into its own depths, and to discover there what cannot be found by science, or in the ordinary consciousness. But he who takes the search for the eternal as seriously as the anthroposophist must do, has to recognize in these other paths the illusions into which such mystics often fall. Anyone who can observe the life of the human soul without prejudice knows the meaning of the human memory in the whole life of the soul. Memories have their origin in the external perceptions of the senses; here we receive our impressions. We call up again the pictures of such impressions from our memories, often years later, and it may then happen that some external sense impression has been received by our soul, perhaps half unconsciously, without being observed with the necessary attentiveness. It has sunk into the furthest depths of the soul, and it comes up again, intentionally or unintentionally, years later. It may not reappear in its original form, but changed in such a way that it will only be recognized by someone with an exact knowledge of the soul's life. What was originally stirred in the soul by an outer impression has been received by all kinds of feelings and impulses of will, received indeed by the organic, bodily constitution; it may arise in the soul years later, entirely changed. He who has taken hold of it may believe that what is really only a transformed sense impression, which has passed through the most varied metamorphoses and has reappeared during mystical self-immersion, is the revelation of something that is eternal and does not originate from the external world of the senses. Anthroposophy has to see how mystics, who look for their revelations in this way, fall into the most grievous illusions; and it has to recognize that such mysticism is a second danger. It has to overcome the dangers which arise both at the limits of our knowledge of nature and at the limits of our own human soul life.

I had to say this first, in order that it can be seen how conscientiously Anthroposophy is alert to all the sources of error which can arise. For I will now describe the ways Anthroposophy itself adopts in order to reach the spiritual, supersensory worlds. I will have to describe much that is paradoxical, much that today is quite unusual.

It is easy to believe, and many people do believe, that Anthroposophy is nothing but a more or less fantastic attempt to acquire knowledge of worlds with which serious scientific research should have nothing to do. Anthroposophy sees clearly, in what ways knowledge about the spiritual is NOT to be achieved and in this way comes to a starting point for genuine research. Having learned about the ways which can lead to illusions and errors, it reaches a real preliminary answer to this question. It can say: With the ordinary powers of knowledge which we have in everyday life, and which are used by our recognized sciences, it is not possible to go further (because of the limits of our knowledge of nature and of mystical self-immersion) than external nature, and what is received by a man from this external nature into the life of his soul. If we are to reach further, we must call on powers in the soul's life which in our ordinary existence are still asleep, and of which man is ordinarily unconscious. Anthroposophy develops such sleeping powers in the soul in order that, when they are awakened, they can achieve knowledge of realms to which our ordinary powers cannot reach. Serious and exact researchers do indeed already speak today about all sorts of abnormal powers of the human soul, or of the human organism, through which they try to show that man is involved in other relationships than those recognized by ordinary biology or physiology. But Anthroposophy is not concerned with such abnormal powers of the soul either. It uses the normal powers of the human soul life, but develops these further. For this one thing is indeed necessary from the first which I would like to call intellectual modesty.

We must be able to say to ourselves: In early childhood we came into the world in a dreamlike condition, and could only use our own limbs very imperfectly, or were quite unable to orientate ourselves in the world. But through education and through life itself, powers which at first only slept in us developed out of the depths of our human constitution. And now that we possess the powers developed by education and by life we must be able to say to ourselves: Within our souls may sleep other powers also which could be unfolded from some starting point that life provides, just as the powers of the child have been developed up to the present time. That this is indeed the case can only be shown in practice, and this is what anthroposophical research does. First we have to consider the whole life of the human soul, in order that we can develop its powers further, from the condition in which we found them in ordinary life.

To begin with, we are concerned with the human power of thought on the one hand, and with the will on the. other. Between these two, between the thinking which has trained itself through the impressions of the senses, and also through the guidance given to us in life—between this power of thought and the power of will through which we can enter life as active human beings, lies the whole realm of our feelings. For anthroposophical research we shall be principally concerned in developing our powers of thought and will up to a higher level than they possess in ordinary life. For knowledge about the eternal cannot be achieved by outer measures, but only through an intimate education of the powers of the soul themselves. But when the power of thought on one side and the power of the will on the other, are developed further than in ordinary life, then the power of feeling, which is the deepest, most essential part of the human soul, will also be in some way transformed, as we shall see. To begin with, we are concerned with the question: How is the power of thought to be prepared for a higher stage of knowledge than that acquired in ordinary life?

Now in my book, “Knowledge of the Higher Worlds and its Attainment,” and in other books as well, I have described these methods and exercises. Today I will describe the development of the soul's capacities in principle, and must refer you to these books for the details. For an introductory lecture it must be sufficient to point out the fundamental principle, which makes clear the real purpose and essence of the matter.

The power of thought which we have in ordinary life depends upon the external impressions of the senses. These impressions are living ones. Before us stands the world of colors and tones, and from it we receive living impressions. There remain behind in our soul the thoughts formed through these impressions, and we regard these thoughts rightly as shadowy. We know that in ordinary life these thoughts have a lesser degree of intensity for the soul than the impressions of the senses. We know too that the ordinary thoughts connected with sense impressions are in a sense taken more passively by man than are the immediate sense impressions.

Now our first task is to take that very vitality with which the soul experiences the impressions of the senses as a standard for the enhanced and strengthened life of thought which is to be developed in Anthroposophy as an instrument of research. The life of thought is to be enhanced and intensified in the following way. What I have to describe will appear simple, though the science of the spirit as a whole, as it is intended here, is no simpler than research in an observatory, in chemical or physical laboratories, or in a clinic. What I am here describing in principle in a simple way demands in practice, according to a man's capacities, years, months, or weeks. There are many such exercises for the soul. I will choose a few characteristic ones.

First, we must observe how we really stand toward thought in ordinary life. Strange though it sounds, the unprejudiced observer of his own thought should really say: The expression, “I think” is not quite exact. Thought develops in contact with external things; we only become conscious because in a sense we look back on our own physical organism and regard ourselves in a way from outside, that this developing thought is bound to our physical organism. Hence we say, “I think.” For the ordinary consciousness this “I think” is by no means fully justified. Anthroposophical research works in a direction through which it can become fully justified. It takes for example a simple idea or a simple group of ideas, and puts it in the midst of the soul's whole conscious life. The whole conscious life of the soul is concentrated on this one idea or group of ideas. This can be achieved through practice; I have described particular exercises in the books I have mentioned.

These exercises can help one to guide one's attention in such a way that it disregards everything else which otherwise occupies the soul from outside or from within, and by one's own innermost decision, as otherwise happens only with tasks of a mathematical kind, one is exclusively concerned with a simple group of ideas or single idea. But it is best, and should really be so, that an idea of this kind is not taken from one's memory. In memory, all sorts of experiences are engaged in alteration and metamorphoses, as I have already indicated.

Therefore it is good to seek out the ideas upon which attention is to be directed, from a book, or something of the kind, which is quite new to one—like an entirely new sense impression to which the living attention of the soul can be directed, and which has its effects through itself alone. Or one can receive from a person, who has experience in these things, a group of ideas of this kind, in order to have something which is entirely new.

There is no need to fear that in this way another person acquires power over one's soul in an improper manner, for it is not a question of letting this group of ideas have an influence upon one, but of developing the soul's own strength through uttermost attentiveness. The result then is that just as the muscles of an arm can be strengthened by exercise, thinking as a power of the soul can be made stronger and more intensive by being concentrated with the uttermost attentiveness upon a definite group of ideas, and by the repetition of such exercises in a rhythmic sequence. In this way the life of thought itself, without being dependent upon the impressions of the senses, can be made as living and intensive as is otherwise the experience of an external sense impression. Before, we had only pale thoughts, as compared with the living sense impressions; now, through these exercises, which I call meditation or concentration, a thinking is to be developed which gains inner strength until it is just as vivid as are sense impressions.

Here you see at once, that anthroposophical research goes in the opposite direction from that followed in the development of certain pathological conditions. What comes about in visions and hallucinations, through medium-ship, or through suggestion under hypnosis and things of this sort, goes in a diametrically opposite direction from the extension of the normal power of thought in anthroposophical research. If a man develops anything which leads him to hallucinations or visions, through which he becomes susceptible to suggestion, the powers of his soul are diverted in a certain way from the sense impressions and stream down into his physical organism. A man who suffers from hallucinations and visions becomes more dependent upon his physical organism than he is upon external sense impressions.

But the anthroposophical path of knowledge aims at the kind of experience which the soul has with external sense impressions. One who practices meditation and concentration must devote himself by his own individual choice, with the attentiveness he develops by his own decision, to that content which he has placed in the midst of his consciousness. Something comes about in this way which is different in principle from all pathological conditions, which can only be confused with the anthroposophical path through misunderstanding. If a man becomes subject to hallucinations and visions, or if he becomes open to suggestions under hypnosis, his whole personality is submerged in this life of hallucinations and visions. Into this disappears his ordinary consciousness, with its power of healthy human judgment.

The opposite is the case when a kind of higher consciousness is developed through meditation and concentration, carried out in the way I have described. If a man really acquires a power of thought which is enhanced and strengthened in this way, he has indeed higher faculties of soul.

But the ordinary clear-minded human being as he is occupied otherwise in knowledge and the fulfillment of his duties, remains active, side by side with the new, in a sense, second personality. The everyday man stands beside this second personality, who possesses a higher power of knowledge; he stands beside him with the ordinary power of knowledge, actively testing and criticizing. That is a difference in principle, which cannot be emphasized enough, when anthroposophical knowledge is described. And then, when in this way, thinking has been strengthened by meditation and concentration, one becomes able to say at a certain point of development: Now I am really the one who thinks within me; now I have experienced in an increased measure my own I within the world of my thoughts. As I experience myself otherwise in the external life of the senses, I experience myself now in thought itself.

This thinking is transformed, however. It does not appear before the soul's gaze like the ordinary pale thinking which is developed for use in the sense world. It is an abstract thinking no longer; it is experienced as intensively as colors and tones and one feels oneself strongly within it. And at a certain point one knows that one is no longer thinking with the help of the bodily instrument. (For ordinary thought always uses the physical instrument; Anthroposophy acknowledges this completely.) Now thinking has detached itself from the nervous system. This is known through inner experience. One knows when the moment has come in which the soul can live independently in thoughts, which however are no longer abstract, but pictorial.

The soul now really experiences itself for the first time, and at a certain moment, when a man is sufficiently mature, the first result of anthroposophical research appears before the soul's gaze. The entire earthly life appears in a mighty single picture, stretching back from the present moment toward birth. Otherwise this earthly life can be reached by memory, but to begin with it is a subconscious or unconscious stream within the soul. With or without our own decision, a few memory pictures can be raised from time to time from this stream, which goes back into our early childhood; but the stream of memories living in the soul more or less unconsciously is not what is meant by the great picture of our lives described here, through which we have in a single moment the inner being of our human experience before us, insofar as this experience takes place on earth. It is not as if we had particular events before us as they appear in memory; we have what can be contemplated as those impulses, which give us our abilities, that which gives us, from within, our moral powers, and that too which from within guides the powers of our growth and our assimilation. We have before us what I have called in the books I have mentioned the body of formative forces, or if we make use of older names which have always existed for such things, the human etheric body or life body.

This is a second, supersensory organism. It cannot be reached on the paths of ordinary natural science, or on the paths of logical thought alone; one must have developed what I have described as an enhanced power of thought, which is called, in the books I have mentioned, “Imaginative knowledge”—not as something concerned with fantasy, but because this thinking lives in the soul in a pictorial form and is itself knowledge. And so one experiences in addition to the external physical body, with its spatial limits, what I would like to call a time body, which is in constant movement, which can be perceived by the soul all at once, like a mighty picture of our life, and which contains everything that has worked from within upon our form, as far back as we can see in our earthly lives.

This body of formative forces, which is the first element in the higher, supersensory man, cannot be immediately represented in a drawing. Anyone who wished to draw it would have to realize that this is like painting a flash of lightning of which only a single moment can be represented. Anything drawn or painted of the etheric body would be like a flash of lighting, held fast only for a moment of its unceasing movement.

Through this the knowledge has been acquired that man in his inner being does not contain only the result of chemical and physical processes in his physical body; it has been learned in direct perception that man bears within him something akin to the nature of thought, and which can be reached through concentrated and strengthened thought processes. It is the first result of anthroposophical development, that one comes to know in perception this first super-sensory member of man's nature, the body of formative forces, or etheric body.

In order to reach further it is now necessary not only to do exercises of concentration and meditation in the way that has been described. It is necessary to observe that although one can give one's attention to such meditation and concentration by one's own decision with absolute clarity like a mathematician making his calculations, one gradually becomes completely absorbed in the subject of this concentration. It becomes difficult to detach oneself from the object of this uttermost attentiveness. Thus side by side with these exercises in concentration, it is necessary to do others which are entirely different. These have the aim of making possible the dismissal from the soul of all that has been placed before one's consciousness through one's own decision, and upon which one has concentrated. This must be dismissed with exactly the same clarity and conscious choice. By doing for a long time, in rhythmic sequence, such exercises in the rejection of ideas which first have been placed in the center of our consciousness with all our strength, a particular faculty of soul is acquired which has great importance for further research. One becomes able to achieve what I would like to call “an empty consciousness in full wakefulness.”

What is meant by this can become clear when we consider how a man who receives no external impressions, or has impressions that are similar to none at all, because they are monotonous or continually repeated, has his power of attention weakened. Under such conditions a man's consciousness becomes sleepy and dull. To achieve an empty consciousness without regular practice is impossible. It can be done only through practicing first an awareness of strongly intensified thoughts which are then dismissed from consciousness. Our consciousness can then remain so intensive and wakeful that it can retain this wakefulness, even when it has at first no content. This empty consciousness has to be achieved if one wishes to reach beyond the first result of anthroposophical research, the power of perceiving in a single picture the soul's inner being since birth.

If such exercises in the dismissal of ideas have been practiced long enough, and a certain maturity in doing this has been achieved, one will be able to dismiss this whole picture of life, which I have described, after it has been present to the soul. A second stage of higher knowledge is achieved if one can dismiss from consciousness (without letting this consciousness then be filled by external impressions) this life picture, which consists of our entire inner human being as it reveals itself during this earthly life as something constantly mobile forming our body from within. This life picture is our inner, etheric, earthly manhood, our body of formative forces, which is to be dismissed from consciousness.

I have called the first stage by the name “Imaginative knowledge;” it gives us only our subjective inner being in a life picture, as I have described. One must be entirely clear that through this first stage of supersensory knowledge one has only this subjective inner being. Then one will not fall into illusions, and even less into visions or hallucinations. A spiritual researcher in the anthroposophical sense is completely clear about every step of his path of knowledge.

If an empty consciousness is achieved through the dismissal of this life picture, the second state of higher super-sensory knowledge begins. I have called it “Inspiration.” Nothing superstitious or traditional is meant by this, but simply what I myself describe.—A terminology is necessary. When this has happened—when an empty consciousness has arisen through the dismissal of the life picture, the body of formative forces—then there arises in the soul through Inspiration what the soul itself was as a being of pure soul and spirit before birth, or, more precisely, before conception, when it was within a world of soul and spirit. The great moment now comes in such research, where one comes to know in immediate contemplation what is eternal in man's nature.

You see, the one who speaks from anthroposophical points of view cannot point to abstract conceptions which prove through logical inference or in some way that immortality exists. Step by step, he has to show what the soul has to do in intimate inner exercises in order to reach that moment when it can perceive what lives as eternal being within our soul. It can perceive this eternal being in the soul at that moment when the soul united itself through conception with the physical, bodily forces which are derived from parents and grandparents.

You may ask: When through Inspiration something of soul and spirit can be perceived, how does one know that this is the spiritual entity of the soul before conception? I can only explain through a comparison what is experienced directly at this point: Anyone who remembers an earthly event has perhaps a picture of what he experienced ten years ago. The content of this picture tells him that he does not have something before his mind which is directly aroused by an event of the present. He knows that the content of the picture directs him to something which happened ten years earlier. What now is experienced through inspired consciousness shows through its own content that it is something utterly different from what is present in the physical, sensory nature, where the soul is within the body. Time itself is part of the experience, as with the memory of earthly events. The impression itself reveals that we are concerned with the life before birth, with the experience through which the soul passed in a pure world of soul and spirit, before it has entered through the mother's body into the physical, sensory nature, which clothes it during earthly life.

After this stage of inspired knowledge has been achieved, and the question of immortality opens out toward a certain solution in one direction, in the direction of unborn-ness,—through other exercises which again have the character of knowledge, the other direction of the problem of immortality can be pursued. This can only happen through certain exercises of the will. Again, you will find exact details in the books I have mentioned, but here I will describe the matter in principle.

Man's will does not think; it does not resemble ordinary thought. Ordinary thought is aroused through external impressions, while man's will originates from within his organism. But in ordinary life we experience what this will is, only in a peculiar way. Take the simplest decision of the will, for example, the movement of the arm or hand, which is carried out because of an impulse of will. What of this impulse of will is really present in consciousness? Ordinarily this is not considered. But methodical research must have a firm starting point. At first we have the thought: we intend to raise and move the arm or hand. How this thought then dives down into our organism, how it stimulates the muscles and takes holds of the bones, how will makes itself effective within our organism, is completely unknown to the ordinary consciousness. Only later through an external impression, with which he can connect a thought, is he aware of the arm or hand which has been raised; of what happens between the first thought and the last impression, it must be said by real knowledge of the soul: This is beyond the grasp of our consciousness just as our experience between falling asleep and waking is beyond our consciousness, with the exception of the chaotic dreams borne up out of the waves of sleep.

It can be said: Man is really entirely awake only insofar as his life of ideas and thought is concerned. Through the element of will, a kind of sleep is included in our waking life. Paradoxical as it sounds, it must be said: Between the thought, which aims at an impulse of will, and the executed action there is a transition which is entirely comparable with falling asleep and awaking. The thought falls asleep into the unknown realm of will and awakens again when we observe the executed action.

The more one penetrates into the mysteries of the will (I can only indicate this briefly) the more one realizes that between these two regions I have described, the thought of intention and the thought which takes account of the observed execution of the act, there is really a kind of sleep present in man's waking life. A great alteration in the nature of the will can then be achieved by exercises, by particular exercises of the will.

Of the many exercises for the will mentioned in my books, I will single out a few here.—The will can be exercised, for example, by the direct influence of thought. The capacities of thinking, feeling and willing, which we have to distinguish in abstract thought when we wish to describe anything about the soul, do not lie so far apart in the real life of the soul, but play into one another. Thus the will plays into our thinking, when we connect or distinguish thoughts.

Now one can perform an exercise of the will by thinking backwards by one's own decision, something which ordinarily is thought of forwards, in the sequence of the external facts. For example, one can think a play backwards, from the fifth act to the first, beginning with the last events of the fifth act and ending with the first events of the first act. Or one can feel in thought the last lines of a poem, or of a melody in reverse order.

An exercise which is particularly valuable is at evening to allow the experience of the day to pass in part vividly before the soul, beginning with the last event of evening and progressing toward the morning. Everything must be taken atomistically as possible; one must go so far as to imagine the ascent of a staircase in reverse, as if it were a descent from the top to the lowest step. The more one forms ideas in this way in an unaccustomed sequence which is not dependent on the external facts, the more one liberates the will, which is accustomed to abandon itself passively to the external facts, from these, and also from the physical body.

After doing such exercises, further support can be won through others which I would like to call “exercises in serious self contemplation and self education.” One must be able to judge one's own actions and impulses of will with the same objective detachment as one can judge the actions and impulses of will of another personality. One must become in a sense the objective observer of one's own resolves and actions.

And one must go further: If you observe life, you know how you have changed in the course of the years. Everyone knows how in the course of ten years he has changed in his whole mood and attitude.—But what has been made of us in the course of the years, has been achieved by life, by external reality. These things must be seen objectively; it must be recognized how passively man accepts this external reality.

But now a man can practice self-education actively, in order to find the way into higher worlds. He can take his self-education in hand, by deciding, for example: “You will overcome this habit.” He uses all his powers to overcome a particular habit, or to acquire some new quality. If through one's own training, one achieves what otherwise is attained only through the influence of life, one gradually acquires the detachment of the will from the physical bodily nature. Something now happens which again I can only describe in a paradoxical way.

These things sound paradoxical because present-day thought is unaccustomed to them, but they are absolutely secure results of the anthroposophical path of knowledge which can be followed in the way I am describing, in order to enter higher worlds.

Although it will sound strange, you can make a comparison between an eye in which the vitreous body is obscured, or which has some kind of cataract so that through some opacity it cannot serve for vision, and an eye which is entirely healthy and transparent. The eye, which does not draw attention through its own bodily nature but takes a selfless part in our whole organism, through this very fact serves for our seeing. In ordinary life, our whole physical organism is comparable to a great opaque eye. Through such exercises of the will, our entire organism is made transparent. This is not done in any unhealthy way but in a way that is thoroughly healthy for ordinary life.

Nothing which is abstract or unhealthy for ordinary life should be attempted for the sake of achieving an entry into higher worlds.—It is a spiritualization of the will. We penetrate into the realm lying between the two thoughts—the thought containing the purpose of an action, and the thought of the action after it has been perceived. By making our organism in a sense entirely transparent for the soul, we enter a spiritual world. This is our task!

Just as the eye is not in the organism for its own sake, the whole physical organism is no longer there when these exercises of the will are continued; in a sense it becomes transparent. And just as it is the physical organism which catches up our impulses of will and makes them opaque, put them to sleep, through its instincts and impulses, its emotions and its entire organic processes,—in the same way everything now becomes transparent, as through the transparent, vitreous body of the eye, what is material is transparent in the eye. Through thus forming our entire physical organism into a transparent sense organ, we have now raised to a higher level a power of the soul which many are unwilling to accept as a means of knowledge, as I well know. It should indeed not be regarded as a means of knowledge as it exists in ordinary life. But through its further development it becomes such a means. This is the power of love.

It is the power of love which in ordinary life gives men a value as social beings. Love is the best and noblest power in ordinary life, individually and socially. When it is enhanced, as it can be enhanced through these exercises of the will, and when these exercises of the will make our organism transparent in this way, love develops to a higher level.

We gain the power to pass over into objective spiritual reality and the third stage of knowledge begins, that of true Intuition,—what I have called “Intuitive knowledge.” The word intuition is used also in ordinary life, and I will return to this point. Not in the sense used in ordinary life, but in this developed form as I have explained it, am I using the phrase “Intuitive knowledge” here. This is a knowledge in which man stands within the spiritual after he has made his body in a sense transparent, has transformed it into a sense organ. Through this knowledge something fresh enters the consciousness of the soul; we now learn how man can live within the will which has become independent of the physical body.

Man lives with the thought, which he has strengthened and united with his will, outside his body; and this provides him with the reflection in knowledge of the process of death.

What happens at death in full reality: that the soul and spirit detach themselves from the physical body and, after the human being has passed through the gate of death, continue their own existence in the world of soul and spirit—this is perceived in a picture, in a reflection that is a basis for knowledge, through intuitive perception, when, through an exercise of the will, we have transformed our whole organism into a sense organ. Thus immortality consists of two sides; on the one hand, of Unbornness, and on the other side, of Immortality, in the exact sense,—the fact that the soul is not destroyed by physical death. The eternity of the human soul consists in Unbornness and Immortality. It can be perceived through real anthroposophical research. Thus man comes to know in direct perception his own eternal and immortal being.

But as man comes to know his own being of soul and spirit, he also comes to know the environment in its soul and spirit nature. Through Inspired and Intuitive knowledge he comes to know the world of soul and spirit, in which the human soul lives before conception and after death. It is a world of real spiritual beings. Just as the world which we perceive with our senses lies before us with all its beings, there lies before the soul which is learning to experience itself in its existence as soul and spirit, the world from which we came at conception and through birth, and into which we enter again at death.—And just as our own bodily nature falls away from us, there falls away the sensory, bodily element which related us to other human beings, and we find ourselves in company with other men through our existence in soul and spirit.

Thus immortality, and the period of our existence in the spiritual world, become real results of knowledge. And this world of soul and spirit which always surrounds us, and which cannot be investigated by thought relying on its own resources beyond the laws of nature—this world of soul and spirit which is hidden in the spiritual part of nature, as the colors and tones are hidden in the sensory world—appears before the perception which can be developed in the way that has been described. The whole of nature then becomes something different from which it was in sense perception. It is not as though external nature with its material qualities and substances were to disappear. Before supersensory knowledge all this remains in existence, just as the healthy human being with his sound human understanding remains side by side with the personality which develops as the possessor of higher power of knowledge. To external nature is added a supersensory, spiritual nature, if you will allow me the seeming contradiction.

I will give one example for this spiritual perception within nature: For our ordinary sight and scientific knowledge the sun with its definite outlines exists in cosmic space. Through astronomy and astrophysics we form a definite picture of the form of the sun as something present in physical space and having its effects there. However, the sun becomes something quite different for the kind of research which uses the higher faculties that I have described. Through this it can be learned that the physical body of the sun present in space is only the body for a spiritual reality—and that this spiritual reality fills the whole space accessible to us. What belongs to the nature of the sun fills all the space accessible to us, and passes as a stream of forces through minerals, plants and animals, and through our human organism as well. In a way it is consolidated or concentrated in the external, spatial body of the physical sun, but what belongs to the sun-nature is present everywhere.

Just as we learn about external nature by representing it in abstract thoughts, through which external nature lives on in pictures, in the same way the spiritual foundations of nature live on more deeply in our spiritual human being. If we observe our abstract thoughts within us, we recognize that they are pictures of external, perceptible nature. If we observe the spiritual element in the external world and perceive how what belongs to the sun-nature works on within our being, we really come to know our own organism. For we find what belongs to the sun's nature within our own human constitution, in all those forces which work particularly strongly while we are still growing; these are the forces permeating us in our youth and which have their point of departure particularly in our brain and work in a plastic and constructive way upon our physical organism especially during early childhood. We come to know what is akin to the sun-nature in our own organism. And we come to know our particular organs: heart, lungs, brain, and so on, with a characteristic development of the sun forces in each. We come to know each organ, as far as its constructive, formative forces are concerned by learning about its relationship with the sun-nature.

I do not hesitate to describe these things, which are assured results of anthroposophical research, although they still appear paradoxical and perhaps fantastic to man today.

Just as we come to know the sun-nature, we can come to know all that stands in relation to the moon. We know the physical outlines of the physical moon; but the moon-nature too fills the whole of cosmic space accessible to us, and has its effects in all realms of nature,—has its effects in plant, mineral and animal,—has its effects too in our physical organism. We come to know the moon-like forces in their work within the whole human being. These are the destructive powers, those powers which are particularly active as we grow old. But these destructive forces are always active, in youth as in old age, within the process of assimilation, side by side with the sun forces.

We come to know how the whole cosmos with its forces streams into man. We come to know all that is present in man as varied processes. We understand the connection of the universe with the human being. And as I could describe in principle what the sun-nature and moon-nature are, the same could be done for other forces in the universe as well. A more intimate relationship than that recognized by ordinary science becomes known in this manner between the human being and the spirit in the universe.

In this way I have reached the point where I can describe how Anthroposophy, although it has developed as knowledge of the supersensory in the way I have described, can come to meet practical life and every region of scientific study. First I must point out how man becomes transparent for knowledge in quite another way, when he is understood in his relationship to the universe. Even physical man becomes the sum of many processes; what appeared to us before as the separate organs of heart, lung and brain, is transformed in a way that we never imagined into processes, in their growth and change. We come to know how constructive and destructive forces are contained in every organ in a different way.

As spiritual physiology and biology can be built up, such knowledge proves itself fruitful, particularly in the field of medicine, for pathology and therapy. When the human organism becomes transparent in this way, abnormal constructive forces, processes of rampant growth, can be known for what they are in the human organism. The abnormal destructive forces, processes of inflammation for example, can be understood in their connections too. For example, one comes to know what exists as polar opposite to an abnormal construction, that is, a process of rampant growth, through understanding the cooperation of sun-nature and moon-nature. One comes to know the corresponding remedy in a plant or a mineral. One comes to know how a process of rampant growth in the human organism corresponds to a destructive process in a plant or a mineral, and similar things. In short, one can go on from mere experiment among remedies to clear knowledge of how everything in nature, through the constructive and destructive processes contained within it, and through the other cosmic processes at work in everything, has its effects in the human organism.

When this is worked out in detail, it proves so fruitful that quite a number of physicians have felt themselves called to take up a rational medicine of this kind. Already there exist clinics at Dörnach near Basle and in Stuttgart, led by trained physicians who have taken up in a fruitful way the results of anthroposophical research into the basic spiritual facts which can supplement all that external research into the human body and into remedies can discover.

It must be emphasized that neither in this field, or in any other, does Anthroposophy engage in any unjustified opposition against what is really justified as scientific in the present time. On the contrary, Anthroposophy, when it is rightly understood must build on exact scientific method. Recognized medicine is in no way to be attacked, but only to be developed further.

Another field is that of the arts. Anthroposophy has existed already for two decades. At a particular time, a number of friends of the anthroposophical conception of the world could feel the necessity of building of Anthroposophy its own home. For reasons which I cannot describe in detail here, this home was built near Basle.

How would this home have been built by a different spiritual movement? If something of the kind was necessary in another spiritual movement, an architect would have been chosen who would have erected a building in the Classical, Renaissance, Rococo, Romanesque or Gothic style, or in a mixture of these styles. This would have been an outer frame for what was done inside it.

Anthroposophy cannot act in this way. It does not desire to produce a theory—something only concerned with the intellect, with the head,—and which can be contained in any sort of building. Anthroposophy seeks to work upon the whole human being. Just as it makes use of the whole human being as a sense organ, so everything that comes into the world through it proceeds from the whole, the entire human being. One cannot imagine a nutshell being formed by any other laws than is the nut itself. It is the same when Anthroposophy has to build, paint or carve, in order to provide a surrounding for itself. Everything artistic then must in a sense proceed from the same laws from which proceed the ideas that are spoken from the rostrum, out of the perception of the spiritual world. Hence, an ordinary, existing style was formed. It may still be very imperfect—it is a first attempt, a first beginning.

What has to be attempted can be described in this way: The shape of every wall and column, all sculpture and painting at Dörnach had to manifest the same thing as do the words spoken from the rostrum when Anthroposophy expresses in ideas what can be discovered in higher words through immediate perception. The spoken word is only another form of all that should work in an artistic way as the surrounding; everything really has flowed into artistic form.

What did Goethe say, when he wished once to express his ideas of art in the most intimate way? He said “Art is a manifestation of secret laws of nature, which without it would never be revealed.” And he also said significantly, “The man to whom nature begins to reveal her most intimate mysteries, feels a deep longing for her most worthy interpretress, Art.” One feels this longing most of all when the spirit which works in nature reveals itself in one's soul through supersensory vision. For then one receives no abstract allegories, but a real spiritual formative power, which has a sense for the materials and which can be embodied in particular substances as true art. Anthroposophy thus has a fruitful effect upon the field of art in all its forms.

A third field where it is shown how Anthroposophy provides fertile new impulses for life, is education. This has often been described in detail in lectures and writings in connection with the foundation and rapid growth of the Waldorf School in Stuttgart. It is a question of transforming what Anthroposophy can give into immediate educational skills; it is not a question of imposing anthroposophical ideas upon the children in the school. Through the fact that Anthroposophy provides a real knowledge of man, it gives a spiritual foundation for carrying out in practice the good principles expressed by the great educators of the nineteenth century. In educational practice, a real knowledge of man is needed. When one has come to know the whole of the human being fully, in body, soul and spirit, it is possible to derive from the child's nature itself the curriculum and the aims of education for each year of the child's school life.

Finally, to mention a few other areas, I would like to point out that Anthroposophy can have a fruitful effect upon social life as well, since the knowledge it achieves is concerned with the whole human being. We have seen how the one-sided use of the way of thinking developed in natural science has its definite limits, and cannot reach the true being of man, so that this way of thinking, if it shapes social purposes, is bound to work destructively.

I do not think that today there is sufficient unprejudiced judgment in wide circles capable of realizing the destructive character, for all human culture, of what has become, in the east of Europe, practical reality—and realized illusions at the same time. Those social impulses are derived from taking into account external nature alone. Like a great threat, there hangs over our entire present-day civilization what has begun its destructive course in the east of Europe. [Steiner refers to the spread of Communism resulting from the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, October 1918.—Ed.]

If social impulses are deepened by considering not only in an external way what is instinctive and natural in man and reckoning free actions in a sense as more highly developed instincts, then the true freedom of man in the spirit can be recognized. I have attempted to do this in my “Philosophy of Spiritual Activity” [published at the beginning of the nineties] on the basis of such anthroposophical principles. In this way a sum of social impulses can arise which relate whole human beings to whole human beings, and which can correct and spiritualize what is hanging over human civilization in such a destructive way, as a threatening specter of the future.

These are a few examples which show how Anthroposophy can be fruitful for life. If one considers the ethical and moral life in an unprejudiced way, as I have attempted to consider it and to place it upon a secure basis in The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity, one comes upon the concept of Intuition of pure thinking, through an unconscious moral Intuition of pure thinking, through an unconscious moral Intuition. The true moral impulses which arise from the conscience are moral; their true source through Inspired and Intuitive knowledge as I have described these today from the anthroposophical point of view.

Thus with its knowledge Anthroposophy comes to meet the most intimate and important feelings and impulses of the human soul, above all, religious devotion. It would be utterly misleading if it were said that Anthroposophy sought to institute a new sect or found a new religion. Since Anthroposophy stands upon the basis of knowledge in the way I have described today, it cannot have about it, or desire anything of a sectarian nature. Nor can it institute a new religion. But if the supersensory reveals itself to knowledge, this can only be of benefit for the religions, and the religious needs of mankind.

One would believe that the representatives of religious faiths must feel deep satisfaction if a spiritual stream appears in our time, able to confirm from the side of knowledge what is sought by faith. Fundamentally it is incomprehensible that the official representatives of religious faiths do not see in Anthroposophy a confirmation of religious life, but often regard it as if it were something hostile. If they really grasped the fundamentals of Anthroposophy, and did not regard it superficially, they would see in it the firmest basis for real piety and real religious life.

For when the light of knowledge comes to meet the seeking soul, not only from the world of the senses but from supersensory worlds as well, then faith is not harmed, but strongly supported; and ethically too, the soul acquires powerful sources of goodness. For moral action it receives meaning, security, and purpose for life, since it comes to know itself as a member of a spiritual world as the external body is a member of a physical world. In this knowledge of himself as a member of a spiritual world, man can come to recognize again his true human dignity and a true ethics and morality worthy of his manhood.

I would like to sum up, as in a picture, what I have tried to describe as the nature of Anthroposophy. We have the human being before us; we see the form of his physical body. We only come to know his whole being when we see how his physiognomy is the expression of his soul and spirit. We have in natural science, which is fully recognized in its justified purposes by Anthroposophy, in a sense the knowledge of the external body of the world. In the natural science of the physical we have something that is itself a kind of intellectual body. Just as we have only the whole of man before us when his soul and spirit is revealed through his physical bodily nature, in the same way we have the knowledge of the world in its entirety, only when as if through a kind of wonderful physiognomy, through all that science offers us in its facts, its experiments, its hypotheses, its natural laws—a cosmic knowledge in soul and spirit comes to expression. For that body of knowledge, given in external natural science, Anthroposophy seeks to be the soul and spirit of a real and complete knowledge of man and of the world.

Das Wesen der Anthroposophie

Man hört heute oftmals den Satz aussprechen, dass in trüben, chaotischen Zeiten des Geisteslebens, in denen die Seelen den Mut und die Zuversicht und die Hoffnung verloren haben, dass in solchen Zeiten allerlei okkulte oder mystische Bestrebungen einen bereiten Boden finden. Und man rechnet wohl in Kreisen, in denen man auf Unterscheidungen allzu wenig Gewicht legt, gegenwärtig oftmals unter solche Bestrebungen diejenige, die sich als Anthroposophie bezeichnet. Nun soll gerade die Betrachtung des heutigen Abends, die vom Wesen dieser Anthroposophie handeln soll, Ihnen zeigen, wie wenig zutreffend das Zusammenwerfen der anthroposophischen Forschungsart mit manchem anderen ist, mit dem man sie heute zusammenwirft.

Anthroposophie — meine verehrten Anwesenden — ist durchaus ausgegangen von dem wissenschaftlichen Ernste und der wissenschaftlichen Gewissenhaftigkeit, die sich namentlich auf naturwissenschaftlichem Boden im Verlaufe der letzten drei, vier, fünf Jahrhunderte, insbesondere aber des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts, entwickelt haben. Nur will Anthroposophie dasjenige, was man naturwissenschaftlich innerhalb gewisser Grenzen entwickeln kann, weiterführen bis zur Erfassung der sogenannten übersinnlichen Welten, bis zu der Erfassung derjenigen Daseinsrätsel, welche vor allen Dingen die tiefsten Sehnsuchten der menschlichen Seele selber betreffen, die Sehnsucht nach der Erforschung des Ewigen in der menschlichen Seele und des Zusammenhanges dieser Seele mit den göttlich-geistigen Untergründen des Daseins.

Wenn nun auch Anthroposophie durchaus ausgegangen ist von wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen, so musste sie sich, da sie eben mit den umfassenden, alle Menschen interessierenden, großen Daseinsrätseln zu tun hat, so musste sie sich eben so entwickeln, dass sie entgegenkommt dem Verständnis auch des einfachsten Menschengemütes, dass sie entgegenkommt den praktischen Zeitbedürfnissen des menschlichen Seelen- und Geisteslebens, die da suchen inneren Halt für die Seele, Sicherheit für die Seele, Kraft zum Handeln, Glauben an die Menschheit, an die menschliche Bestimmung. Und es musste diese Anthroposophie auch entgegenkommen den verschiedensten sozialen und namentlich den religiösen Bestrebungen in der Art, wie ich heute Abend das noch darstellen will, wenn sie auch selbst eben durchaus — das muss immer wieder betont werden — den wissenschaftlichen Ausgangspunkt hat. Aber man möchte in Bezug auf diesen Ausgangspunkt sagen: Anthroposophie muss ernster, als mancher, der da glaubt, auf dem festen Boden der naturwissenschaftlichen Forschung heute zu stehen, ernster diejenigen Möglichkeiten ins Auge fassen, die gerade bei naturwissenschaftlichem Forschen offenstehen. Und da muss Anthroposophie vor allen Dingen hinschauen auf dasjenige, was recht besonnene naturwissenschaftliche Denker als die Grenze der Naturwissenschaft anerkennen.

Wenn wir uns der Forschungsmethode der Naturwissenschaft bedienen, der Beobachtung der äußeren Sinneswelt, des Experimentes und des Denkens, das die Ergebnisse von Beobachtung und Experiment kombiniert, und so die Naturgesetze [finden], wie wir sie gewohnt sind anzuerkennen, so kommt man eben einfach zu der Anschauung, dass diese naturwissenschaftliche Forschung Grenzen habe, dass sie eigentlich über die Sinneswelt und ihre Gesetze nicht hinauskommen könne, dass sie vom menschlichen Wesen nicht mehr begreifen kann als dasjenige, was als menschlich-physisch-leibliche Natur aus dieser Sinneswelt genommen ist; dass sie sich bescheiden müsse, Grenzen anzuerkennen, gegenüber dem, was des Menschen eigentlichen Wert, sein Wesen, seine Würde ausmacht; bescheiden müsse damit, in das eigentlich Geistig-Seelische des Menschen nicht einzudringen. Gerade solche Dinge muss Anthroposophie, wenn sie selber ernst genommen werden will, durchaus mit der nötigen Gewissenhaftigkeit ins Auge fassen. Sie muss diese eine Klippe klar sehen, dass man nicht bloß aus einer Willkür heraus mit demjenigen Denken, das man an der Naturwissenschaft sich heranerzogen hat, über die Sinnenwelt hinauskommen kann. Nicht aus einer Willkür heraus, sondern weil an der Sinnesbeobachtung dieses Denken selber seine Stärke, seine Erziehung entwickelt und daher sofort ins Leere, ins Unbestimmte, ins Unbefriedigende kommt, wenn es, sich selbst überlassen, in Gebiete eindringen will, die über die Sinnenwelt hinaus liegen.

Sie wissen ja — meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden —, dass es gewisse philosophische Spekulationen gibt, durch welche das sich selbst überlassene Denken hinaus will von dem sinnlich Gegebenen zu dem Übersinnlichen. Es will dieses sich selbst überlassene Denken allerlei logische Schlüsse ziehen vom Zeitlichen nach dem Ewigen hin. Derjenige, der unbefangen seine seelischen Bedürfnisse nach dem Ewigen aber an solchen logischen Schlüssen befriedigen will, der gerät eben ins Unbefriedigende, denn er sieht alsbald: So sicher dieses Denken dann ist, wenn es die Wesenheiten und die Erscheinungen der Natur betrachtet, so unsicher wird dieses sich selbst überlassene Denken, wenn es hinausdringen will über dasjenige, was den Sinnen zugänglich ist. Daher haben wir ja auch den Streit der sogenannten philosophischen Systeme. Der eine, nach seiner subjektiven Eigentümlichkeit, geht in dieser Weise über die Sinnenwelt hinaus und stellt dieses System auf. Der andere stellt jenes System auf. Alles das gibt durchaus keine harmonische Weltanschauung, das gibt eben durchaus etwas Unbefriedigendes. Dasjenige, was ein unbefangenes Gemüt empfinden muss gegenüber solchem sich selbst überlassenen Denken, das muss sich gerade Anthroposophie klar vor Augen führen. Und damit ist ihr gegeben die eine Klippe, an welcher vorbeigekommen werden muss, wenn die Wege eröffnet werden sollen zum Erforschen des Ewigen in der Menschennatur und des Ewigen im Weltall.

Anthroposophie muss durchaus die Grenzen der Naturerkenntnis anerkennen. Und Anthroposophie muss auf der anderen Seite hinsehen, wie heute gewisse tiefere Gemüter sehen diese Grenzen der Naturerkenntnis und nun woanders Hilfe suchen, die ihnen von der Naturwissenschaft für die großen Rätselfragen des Daseins nicht kommen kann. Sie suchen dann Hilfe in sogenannten mystischen Versenkungen. Sie suchen dann Hilfe in dem, was man oftmals die Selbstschau der Seele nennt. Da soll die Seele durch Versenkung in das eigene Innere in die tieferen Schächte hinuntersteigen, soll dann in diesen tieferen Schächten etwas anderes entdecken als dasjenige, was man durch Naturwissenschaft oder im gewöhnlichen Bewusstsein findet. Aber gerade derjenige, der so ernst mit dem Forschen nach dem Ewigen zu Werke geht wie der in der Anthroposophie Stehende, muss auch in diesem anderen Wege die Illusionen sehen, denen sich solche Mystiker oftmals hingeben. Wer unbefangen das menschliche Seelenleben betrachten kann, der weiß nämlich, was menschliche Erinnerung eigentlich im Gesamt-Seelenleben bedeutet. Die Erinnerungen werden angefacht an den äußeren Sinneswahrnehmungen. Da bekommen wir als Menschen unsere Eindrücke. Wir holen dann die Bilder von solchen Eindrücken oftmals nach Jahren wiederum aus dem Gedächtnis hervor. Und da kann es vorkommen, dass irgendein äußerer Sinneseindruck von unserer Seele aufgenommen worden ist, vielleicht halb unbewusst, ohne dass man es mit der nötigen Aufmerksamkeit betrachtet hat. Er ist dann hinuntergesenkt worden in die tiefsten Tiefen des Seelenlebens, und er kommt willkürlich oder unwillkürlich nach Jahren wieder herauf. Und er braucht nicht so heraufzukommen, wie er in die Seele versenkt worden ist, er kann verwandelt heraufkommen, sodass ihn nur der genauere Kenner des Seelenlebens wiedererkennt. Dasjenige, was durch einen äußeren Eindruck in der Seele losgelöst wird, das wird in Empfang genommen von allerlei Empfindungen, von Gefühlen, von Willensimpulsen, ja, es wird innerlich in Empfang genommen von der organischen, von der Leibeskonstitution des Menschen, von der Gesamtverfassung des menschlichen Leibes. Und ganz verwandelt kann es nach Jahren wiederum aus der Seele hervorgeholt werden. Und derjenige, der dann befangen ist, der kann glauben, dass dasjenige, was nur ein umgewandelter Sinneseindruck ist, der die verschiedensten Metamorphosen in der Seele durchgemacht hat, dass das, wenn es durch innere Versenkung heraufgeholt wird, irgendeine Offenbarung eines Ewigen ist, was nicht aus der sinnlichen Außenwelt stamme. Anthroposophie muss gerade sehen, wie Mystiker, die auf solche Art ihre Offenbarungen suchen, zu den herbsten Illusionen kommen, und sie muss in dieser Mystik die zweite Klippe anerkennen. Sie muss an der Klippe der Grenze der Naturerkenntnis und an der Klippe der Grenze des eigenen menschlichen Seelenlebens vorbeikommen.

Ich musste diese Worte vorausschicken — meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden —, aus dem Grunde, damit gesehen werde, wie gewissenhaft Anthroposophie alle Fehlerquellen, die entstehen können, aufsucht. Denn ich werde ja im Folgenden Ihnen die Wege, welche Anthroposophie selber einschlägt, um in die geistigen, die übersinnlichen Welten zu kommen, zu schildern haben, und da werde ich Ihnen manches Paradoxe, heute noch ganz Ungewohnte, zu schildern haben. Man könnte leicht glauben — es glauben das viele —, dass Anthroposophie auch nichts weiter sei als ein mehr oder weniger phantastischer Versuch, erkenntnismäßig in Welten einzudringen, mit denen sich eine ernste Wissenschaft nichts zu tun machen sollte. Anthroposophie weiß, wie man über das Geistig-Übersinnliche nicht forschen kann. Und daher kann sie auch einen Ausgangspunkt gewinnen über die Art und Weise, wie man wirklich forschen kann. Indem sie erkennt, welche Wege zu Illusionen und Irrtümern führen können, dringt sie zu der eigentlichen — ich möchte sagen — zunächst vorahnenden Beantwortung der Frage vor. Sie sagt sich: Mit den gewöhnlichen Erkenntniskräften, wie man sie im alltäglichen Leben, in der anerkannten Wissenschaft hat, mit denen kann man wegen der Grenze der Naturerkenntnis, wegen der Grenze der mystischen Versenkung überhaupt nicht weiter kommen als zu der äußeren Natur und zu demjenigen, was der Mensch aus dieser äußeren Natur in sein Seelenleben hereinbekommt. Will man also über diese äußere Natur hinauskommen, so muss man an Kräfte des Seelenlebens appellieren, die im gewöhnlichen Dasein in der Seele schlummern, die im gewöhnlichen Dasein gar nicht vorhanden sind, oder besser gesagt, deren sich der Mensch nicht bewusst ist. Und solche in der Seele schlummernden Kräfte will Anthroposophie ausbilden, damit diese neu erweckten Erkenntniskräfte dann eindringen in Welten, in welche man mit den gewöhnlichen Erkenntniskräften eben nicht eindringen kann.

Man redet heute schon durchaus von Seiten ernster, wissenschaftlicher Forscher von allerlei abnormen Kräften der menschlichen Seele oder des menschlichen Organismus, durch die bezeugt werden soll, dass der Mensch in noch anderen Zusammenhängen drinnensteht, als die gewöhnliche Biologie oder Physiologie sie zeigen. Mit solchen abnormen Kräften des Seelenlebens aber hat Anthroposophie als solche auch nichts zu tun. Sie wendet sich an die normalen Kräfte des menschlichen Seelenlebens und bildet diese nur weiter fort. Dazu hat man allerdings am Ausgangspunkt eines nötig, ich möchte es nennen: intellektuelle Bescheidenheit. Man muss sich einmal sagen können: Wie war man als Kind, als ganz kleines Kind, da man mit einem traumhaften Seelenleben in die Welt hereingegangen ist, in diesem traumhaften Seelenleben sich nur unvollkommen seiner eigenen Leibesglieder bedienen konnte, unvollkommen oder gar nicht sich in der Welt orientieren konnte. Aber aus den Tiefen der menschlichen Wesenheit konnten herausentwickelt werden durch Erziehung und durch das Leben diejenigen Kräfte, die erst in den Tiefen dieser Menschenorganisation schlummerten. Nun muss man sich im Besitze dieser Seelenkräfte, die die Erziehung, die das Leben herangebildet haben, einmal sagen: In dieser menschlichen Seele könnten noch andere Kräfte schlummern, die geradeso von einem gewissen Ausgangspunkte des Lebens aus weiterentwickelt werden können, wie die kindlichen Seelenkräfte bis zu dem gegenwärtigen Entwicklungspunkt weiter entfaltet worden sind. Dass das der Fall ist, kann allerdings nur die Praxis lehren, und in diese Praxis tritt anthroposophische Forschung ein. Und da handelt es sich darum, dass zunächst hineingesehen werde in das ganze menschliche Seelenleben, um die einzelnen Kräfte dieses Seelenlebens, wie sie einfach im normalen Dasein vorhanden sind, weiterzubilden.

Wir haben es ja - meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden — zunächst zu tun mit der menschlichen Denkkraft, mit der Gedankenbildung auf der einen Seite; wir haben es zu tun mit der Willenskraft auf der anderen Seite. Zwischen beiden, zwischen der Gedankenkraft, die sich entwickelt an den äußeren Eindrücken, oder auch aus den Orientierungen heraus, die uns das Leben geschenkt hat, zwischen dieser Gedankenkraft und der Willenskraft, durch die wir uns hineinstellen als tätige Menschen in das Leben, liegt das Gemüt, liegt die Summe unserer Empfindungen und Gefühle. Es wird sich nun vorzugsweise für die anthroposophische Forschung darum handeln, zu einer höheren Stufe, als das gewöhnliche Leben sie bildet, die Denkkraft und die Willenskraft auszugestalten. Denn nicht durch äußere Maßnahmen kann das Ewige erforscht werden, sondern allein durch intime Ausbildung der Seelenkräfte selbst. Wenn aber die Denkkraft auf der einen Seite, wenn die Willenskraft auf der anderen Seite weiter entfaltet werden, als sie im gewöhnlichen Leben sind, dann wird dasjenige, was das tiefste und innerste, das seelenhafteste Wesen der menschlichen Natur ist, die Gemütskraft, in irgendeiner Weise, wie wir sehen werden, von selber mitgehen. Es kann sich also zunächst um die Frage handeln: Wie ist die Denkkraft zu einer höheren Stufe des Erkennens auszubilden, als das gewöhnliche Leben sie darstellt?

Ich habe nun in meinem Buche «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?» und im zweiten Teil meiner «Geheimwissenschaft» und in anderen Büchern die Wege und Übungen geschildert. Ich will heute zunächst das Prinzipielle der Ausbildung der Seelenfähigkeiten kennzeichnen und muss in Bezug auf die Einzelheiten dann auf die genannten Bücher verweisen. Allein für einen einleitenden Vortrag muss es genügen, eben auf das Prinzipielle, das auf den eigentlichen Sinn, auf das Wesen der Sache deutet, hinzuweisen.

Dasjenige, was wir als Denkkraft im gewöhnlichen Leben haben, lehnt sich ja an äußere Sinneseindrücke an. Die äußeren Sinneseindrücke sind lebendig. Wir stellen uns hin vor die farbige, die tönende Welt. Wir bekommen lebendige Eindrücke. In unserer Seele bleiben zurück die Gedanken, die sich an diesen Eindrücken bilden. Wir nennen sie mit Recht blass. Wir wissen, dass diese Gedanken geringere Intensität im gewöhnlichen Leben haben als die Sinneseindrücke für das Seelenleben. Wir wissen auch, dass die gewöhnlichen Gedanken, die sich an die Sinneseindrücke anschließen, in einer gewissen Weise passiver von den Menschen hingenommen werden, wie die Sinneseindrücke sich in der Seele erregen. Dasjenige, um was es sich zunächst handelt, das ist, dass gerade die Sinneseindrücke mit der Lebendigkeit, in welche sie die Seele versetzen, als ein Vorbild genommen werden für das erhöhte, erkraftete Gedankenleben selbst, das zunächst Anthroposophie ausbilden will zum Behufe ihrer Forschung. Da handelt es sich darum, dass dieses Gedankenleben in der folgenden Weise erhöht, gesteigert, erkraftet werde. Es wird einfach aussehen, was ich zu schildern habe, allein im Ganzen ist Geisteswissenschaft, wie sie hier gemeint ist, nicht einfacher als die Forschungen auf der Sternwarte, oder in chemischen, physikalischen Laboratorien oder auf der Klinik. Dasjenige, was heute in einfacher Weise prinzipiell von mir geschildert wird, erfordert je nach der Anlage, die der Mensch dafür hat, Jahre oder Monate oder Wochen und so weiter.

Es gibt nun viele solcher inneren Seelenübungen. Ich will nur Charakteristisches herausheben. Dasjenige, um was es sich handelt, ist, dass man zunächst aufmerksam werde, wie man im gewöhnlichen Leben eigentlich zum Denken steht. So sonderbar es klingt, derjenige, der unbefangen auf sein eigenes Denken hinsieht, der müsste eigentlich sagen: Der Ausdruck "Ich denke" stimmt nicht ganz. Das Denken entwickelt sich an den äußeren Dingen. Wir werden nur gewahr, weil wir gewissermaßen zurückblicken auf den physischen Organismus, weil wir uns gewissermaßen selbst von außen sehen. Wir werden nur gewahr, dass das Denken, das sich entwickelt, an unseren physischen Organismus gebunden ist, und sprechen daher das Wort "Ich denke». Dieses «Ich denke ist für das gewöhnliche Bewusstsein gar nicht voll berechtigt. Dass es voll berechtigt werde, dazu strebt gerade anthroposophische Forschung. Sie strebt dazu, indem sie zum Beispiel eine einfache Vorstellung oder einen einfachen Vorstellungskomplex in die Mitte des Bewusstseins des ganzen Seelenlebens setzt. Man kann das so tun, dass man das ganze Seelenleben konzentriert auf diese eine Vorstellung oder diesen einen Vorstellungskomplex. Durch Üben ist es zu erreichen. Die einzelnen Übungen habe ich beschrieben in den schon von mir genannten Büchern, die einem helfen können, die Aufmerksamkeit also zu lenken, dass man die Aufmerksamkeit von allem Übrigen, das sonst die Seele von außen und innen beschäftigt, ablenkt und mit voller innerlicher Willkür, wie man sonst nur bei mathematisch-rechnerischen Aufgaben verfährt, hingegeben sein kann mit ganzer Seele einem solchen einfachen Vorstellungskomplex oder einer einfachen Vorstellung.

Nun ist es besonders gut — es soll eigentlich sein —, dass man eine solche Vorstellung nicht etwa aus der Erinnerung heraufholt. In der Erinnerung sind, wie ich schon angedeutet habe in der Einleitung zu diesem Vortrag, allerlei Erlebnisse in Veränderung, in Metamorphose, vorhanden. Wenn man einfach eine solche Vorstellung aus der Erinnerung heraufholt, dann mischt sich alles mögliche aus dem Unterbewusstsein und Unbewussten hinein in die Sache, und man kann niemals sicher sein, dass man nur dasjenige im Bewusstsein habe, worauf man willkürlich, voll besonnen seine Aufmerksamkeit richtet. Und darauf kommt es an. Daher ist es gut, wenn man zum Beispiel dasjenige, auf das man also die Aufmerksamkeit wenden will, irgendwo in einem Buche oder dergleichen sucht, als etwas, was ganz neu ist, wie ein ganz neuer Sinneseindruck, dem man mit Lebendigkeit der Seele hingegeben sein kann, und der einzig und allein durch sich selber wirkt. Oder man lässt sich von demjenigen, der in solchen Dingen erfahren ist, einen solchen Vorstellungskomplex geben, damit man eben etwas hat, was der Seele vollständig neu ist. Man darf nicht fürchten, dass auf diese Weise ein anderer irgendeine suggestive Gewalt über die Seele bekommen könnte. Denn es handelt sich nicht darum, dass irgendein Vorstellungsinhalt auf die Seele wirkt, sondern darum, dass die Seele ihre ureigensten Kräfte in gespanntester Aufmerksamkeit selber entwickelt. Dann stellt sich das Folgende heraus: Wie man den Muskel eines Armes verstärken, erkraften kann, indem man ihn arbeitend gebraucht, so kann man das Denken als seelische Kraft intensivieren, verstärken, erkraften dadurch, dass man es so in gespanntester Aufmerksamkeit konzentriert auf einen bestimmten Vorstellungskomplex, und solche Übungen in rhythmischer Folge immer wiederholt. Dadurch gelangt man allmählich dazu, das Gedankenleben selber, ohne dass es sich an Sinneseindrücke anlehnt, so lebendig, so intensiv zu machen, wie sonst das seelische Erleben in dem äußeren Sinneseindruck lebendig ist. Wie man sonst nur blasse Gedanken hat gegenüber der Lebendigkeit der Sinneseindrücke, so muss man durch diese seelischen Übungen, die ich Meditation, Konzentration nenne, ein solches Denken entwickeln, das innerlich erkraftet ist bis zu der Lebendigkeit des Sinneseindruckes.

Sie sehen hier sogleich — meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden —, dass anthroposophische Forschung durchaus nach der entgegengesetzten Seite hin geht, wie die Entwicklung gewisser pathologischer, krankhafter menschlicher Seelenzustände. Dasjenige, was der Mensch entwickelt in Visionen, Halluzinationen, durch Mediumismus, durch Suggestion und dergleichen in der Hypnose, das geht nach genau der entgegengesetzten Richtung wie dasjenige, was die Fortsetzung der normalen Denkfähigkeit in der anthroposophischen Forschungsmethode ist. Wenn der Mensch irgendetwas entwickelt, was ihn zur Halluzination, zur Vision führt, wobei er suggestiv beeinflussbar wird, so strömen gewissermaßen seine Seelenkräfte von den Sinneseindrücken fort, sie strömen hinunter in den Organismus des Menschen. Der Mensch wird von seinem Organismus mehr abhängig als Halluzinant, als Visionär, als er bei den äußeren Sinneseindrücken ist. Aber gerade die Art des seelischen Erlebens bei dem äußeren Sinneseindruck, die ist das Ideal des anthroposophischen Erkenntnisweges, der entwickelt werden soll. Also der Mensch muss vor allen Dingen, indem er Meditation und Konzentration übt, mit voller innerer Willkür mit willkürlich entwickelter Aufmerksamkeit, dem seelischen Inhalte, den er selbst in die Mitte des Bewusstseins gerückt hat, hingegeben sein. Dadurch kommt etwas zustande, was nun prinzipiell verschieden ist von allen krankhaften Seelenzuständen, mit denen man den anthroposophischen Weg nur missverständlich verwechseln kann. Wenn der Mensch Halluzinant, Visionär wird, wenn er in Hypnose kommt, irgendwie für Suggestionen beeinflussbar wird, so geht seine Gesamtpersönlichkeit unter in dem halluzinatorischen und visionären Leben. Sein gewöhnliches Bewusstsein des gesunden Menschenverstandes verschwindet hinein in das halluzinatorische, das visionäre Erleben.

Das Gegenteil ist der Fall, wenn sich durch Meditation und Konzentration, die so vollführt werden, wie ich es geschildert habe, eine Art höheres Bewusstsein entwickelt. Wenn der Mensch dazu gelangt, nun wirklich ein gesteigertes, ein intensiveres, ein erkraftetes Denken zu haben, dann entwickeln sich höhere Seelenkräfte. Aber der gewöhnliche, besonnene Mensch, wie er sonst im Erkenntnisleben, im Pflichtleben drinnensteht, der bleibt neben der anderen, gewissermaßen zweiten Persönlichkeit voll erhalten. Er steht eben neben der zweiten Persönlichkeit mit dem höheren Erkenntnisvermögen. Er steht neben ihr mit dem gewöhnlichen Erkenntnisvermögen, kontrollierend, kritisierend. Das ist ein prinzipieller Unterschied, der nicht genug hervorgehoben werden kann, wenn von anthroposophischer Erkenntnis gesprochen wird.

Und dann, wenn man auf diesem Wege nun durch Meditation und Konzentration das Denken verstärkt, dann kommt man dazu, an einem gewissen Punkte der Entwicklung sich zu sagen: Jetzt bin ich es wirklich in mir, der das denkt; jetzt habe ich in gesteigertem Maße mein Ich in meiner Gedankenwelt erlebt. Wie ich mich sonst in den äußeren Sinneserlebnissen erlebe, so erlebe ich mich jetzt im bloßen Denken. Dieses Denken bildet sich aber auch um. Es sieht gewissermaßen vor dem Seelenblicke nicht mehr so aus, wie das gewöhnliche, für die Sinneswelt entwickelte, blasse Denken aussieht. Es ist nicht mehr ein abstraktes Denken, es ist ein erlebtes Denken. Es ist intensiv, wie die Farben und die Töne. Und man erlebt sich selber intensiv darinnen. Und ein Punkt tritt ein, wo man weiß: Jetzt denkt man nicht mehr mit Hilfe des leiblichen Werkzeuges. Denn man denkt im gewöhnlichen Denken immer mit Hilfe des leiblichen Werkzeuges, das muss gerade die Anthroposophie zugeben. Jetzt hat sich das Denken losgelöst von dem Nervensystem. Solches weiß man durch innere Erfahrung. Man weiß, wenn der Moment gekommen ist, dass es die Seele in sich selber ist, die unabhängig jetzt in Gedanken lebt, in Gedanken, die aber nicht mehr abstrakte Gedanken sind, die Bildergedanken sind. Indem die Seele sich jetzt erst wirklich seelisch erlebt, jetzt tritt das erste Erlebnis in einem bestimmten Momente, wenn der Mensch reif ist dazu, es tritt das erste Ergebnis anthroposophischer Forschung vor dem Seelenblicke auf, und das ist, dass in einem großen Lebenstableau das ganze bisherige Erdenleben bis gegen die Geburt hin auf einmal vor der Seele steht. Wir haben sonst dieses Erdenleben für die Erinnerung erreichbar, aber zunächst als einen unterbewussten oder unbewussten Strom im Innern der Seele. Willkürlich oder unwillkürlich können einige Erinnerungsbilder ab und zu heraufgeholt werden aus diesem Strom, der bis in unsere frühesten Kindheitsjahre zurückgeht. Aber dasjenige, was also als ein mehr oder weniger unbewusster Erinnerungsstrom in der Seele lebt, das ist es nicht, was hier gemeint ist, wenn von dem Lebenstableau gesprochen wird, durch das wir auf einmal das Innere unseres menschlichen Erlebens vor uns haben, soweit dies Erleben das irdische Erleben zunächst ist. Nicht als ob wir einzelne Ereignisse, wie die Erinnerung sie darbietet, vor uns hätten, sondern wir haben vor uns dasjenige, was man überschauen kann als die Impulse, die uns unsere Fähigkeiten geben, als dasjenige, was von innen heraus unsere moralischen Kräfte uns gibt, was von innen heraus aber auch unsere Wachstumskräfte dirigiert, unsere Ernährung leitet. Wir haben vor uns etwas, was ich genannt habe in den genannten Schriften, den Bildekräfteleib, oder, wenn man sich anlehnt an ältere [Namen], die ja immer von solchen Dingen da gewesen sind, den Ätherleib oder Lebensleib des Menschen.

Das ist eine zweite, eine übersinnliche Organisation. Man kann sie nicht auf dem Wege der gewöhnlichen Naturwissenschaft, auch nicht auf dem Wege des bloßen logischen Denkens erreichen, sondern man muss dasjenige ausgebildet haben, was ich als erkraftetes Denken charakterisiert habe und in den genannten Büchern als imaginative Erkenntnis bezeichnet habe, nicht, weil man es mit Einbildungen zu tun hat, sondern weil dieses Denken bildhaft in der Seele lebt, selber Erkenntnis ist. Und so erlebt man zu dem räumlich-begrenzten, äußeren physischen Leibe dasjenige, was ich einen Zeitleib nennen möchte, einen Leib, der in Bewegung ist, der auf einmal, wie ein gewaltiges Lebenstableau eben vor dem Seelenblicke jetzt geschaut werden kann, der alles enthält, soweit wir zurückschauen können im Erdenleben, was innerlich an uns gestaltet hat. Man kann diesen Bildekräfteleib, der der erste Bestandteil des höheren, des übersinnlichen Menschen ist, nicht unmittelbar zeichnen. Wenn man ihn zeichnen will, muss man sich bewusst sein, dass man so verfährt, wie wenn man etwa den Blitz malte, wo man auch nur einen Augenblick festhalten kann. Das, was man da zeichnen oder malen würde von dem Ätherleib, das wäre wie ein Blitzstrahl, nur einen Augenblick in seiner immerwährenden Beweglichkeit festgehalten.

Damit — meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden — ist man zu der Erkenntnis vorgedrungen, dass der Mensch in seinem Innern nicht nur etwa die Ergebnisse der leiblich, chemischen, physischen Kräfte birgt, sondern durch Anschauung hat man erkennen gelernt, dass der Mensch etwas gerade Gedankenartiges, durch verdichtete, erstarkte, erkraftete Gedanken Erreichbares in seinem Innern trägt. Es ist das erste anthroposophische Ergebnis, dass man dieses erste übersinnliche Glied der Menschennatur, den Bildekräfteleib, den Ätherleib schauend kennenlernt.

Um weiterzugelangen, ist nun nötig, dass man nicht nur die Konzentrations- und Meditationsübungen in der Art, wie es beschrieben ist, macht, sondern dass man beachtet, wie man, trotzdem man in völliger Willkür mit absoluter innerer Besonnenheit, wie ein Mathematiker, der rechnet, sich hingeben kann der Meditation und der Konzentration, wie man doch allmählich auch ganz und gar hingegeben ist demjenigen, auf das man sich konzentriert, und wie man Mühe hat, wiederum herauszukommen aus demjenigen, worauf sich die Seele also mit vollgespanntester Aufmerksamkeit konzentriert hat. Man muss daher parallel mit diesen Übungen der Konzentration ganz andere machen, die alle darauf hinauslaufen, nun wiederum dasjenige, was man durch Willkür in das Bewusstsein hereingerückt hat, worauf man sich konzentriert hat, wiederum aus der Seele zu beseitigen, gewissermaßen ebenso besonnen, ebenso willkürlich fortzuschicken. Indem man lange Zeit und in rhythmischer Folge solche Übungen des Unterdrückens von Vorstellungen, die man erst mit aller Kraft in den Mittelpunkt des Bewusstseins gestellt hat, indem man solche Übungen genügend lange Zeit macht, gelangt man zu einer ganz besonderen Seelenfähigkeit, die nun für das weitere Forschen von größerer Wichtigkeit ist. Man gelangt dazu, dasjenige herzustellen, was ich nennen möchte: leeres Bewusstsein bei völligem Wachen.

Meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden! Es wird klar werden können, was damit gemeint ist, wenn man sich darauf besinnt, wie der Mensch —- wenn er keine äußeren Eindrücke hat, oder wenn er sie hat, sie so sind wie keine, weil sie im Leierton oder immerwährenden Wiederholungen verlaufen, sodass die Aufmerksamkeit durch sie geschwächt wird — es ist bekannt, wie der Mensch dann in ein schlafähnliches, dumpfes Bewusstsein kommt. Leeres Bewusstsein herzustellen ist ohne ein regelrechtes Üben gar nicht möglich. Erst dadurch, dass man erst geübt hat, starke, erkraftete Gedanken im Bewusstsein zu haben und diese zu unterdrücken, bleibt das Bewusstsein so intensiv, so wach, dass es sich dieses Wachsein bewahrt, wenn es zunächst keinen Inhalt hat. [Dieses leere Bewusstsein muss man zunächst herstellen können, wenn man von dem], was das erste Ergebnis der anthroposophischen Forschung ist, das seelische Innere seit der Geburt in einem Tableau zu schauen, weitergehen will.

Hat man namentlich solche Übungen im Unterdrücken von Vorstellungen genügend lange geübt, und hat man darin einen gewissen Zustand der Reife erlangt, dann ist man imstande, dieses Lebenstableau, das ich geschildert habe, nun auch zu unterdrücken, nachdem es sich vor die Seele gestellt hat. Und wenn man in die Lage kommt, dieses Lebenstableau, das heißt unseren gesamten inneren Menschen, wie er sich in diesem Erdenleben innerlich gestaltend in unserem Leibe als ein immerwährendes Bewegliches darstellt, wenn man diesen inneren Menschen, diesen inneren ätherischen Erdenmenschen — möchte ich sagen —, diesen Bildekräfteleib unterdrückt und das Bewusstsein nun nicht mit äußeren Eindrücken anfüllt, sondern zunächst leer lässt, dann tritt die zweite Stufe der höheren Erkenntnis ein. Die erste habe ich das imaginative Erkennen genannt. Es liefert nur das subjektive eigene Innere in einem Lebenstableau, wie ich es geschildert habe. Und nun muss man sich ganz klar sein, dass man durch diese erste Stufe übersinnlicher Erkenntnis eben nur das eigene Innere, das Subjektive, hat. Dann wird man auch nicht einmal zu Illusionen, viel weniger zu Visionen, Halluzinationen kommen. Derjenige, der in anthroposophischem Sinne ein Geistesforscher ist, ist sich eben über jeden Schritt seines Forschungsweges absolut klar. Dann aber, wenn durch Unterdrückung dieses Lebenstableaus leeres Bewusstsein hergestellt wird, dann tritt die zweite Stufe der höheren, der übersinnlichen Erkenntnis ein. Ich habe sie die inspirierte Erkenntnis genannt. Man soll dabei nicht an etwas Abergläubisches oder Traditionelles denken, sondern, weil man ja eine Terminologie braucht, nur an dasjenige, was ich selber schildere. Und dann, wenn dies nun eingetreten ist, wenn nun leeres Bewusstsein entstanden ist durch Unterdrückung des Lebenstableaus, des Bildekräfteleibes, dann tritt durch die Inspiration in der Seele auf dasjenige, was die Seele als rein geistig-seelisches Wesen vor der Geburt oder vor der Konzeption — besser gesagt — in einer wie geistig-seelischen Welt selber war. Und jetzt tritt der große Moment der Forschung ein, wo man durch unmittelbare Anschauung bekannt wird mit dem Ewigen in der Menschennatur.

Sie sehen — meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden —, derjenige, der von anthroposophischen Gesichtspunkten aus spricht, der kann nicht in irgendwelchen abstrakten Begriffen hinweisen darauf, wie man durch logische Schlüsse oder dergleichen beweisen kann die Unsterblichkeit. Er muss Schritt für Schritt angeben, wie es die Seele in intimen inneren Übungen machen muss, um bis zu dem Punkt zu gelangen, wo sie anschauen kann dasjenige, was als Ewiges in unserer Seele lebt, wo sie es anschauen kann, dieses Ewige in der Seele, in der Zeit, wo diese Seele durch die Konzeption sich verbunden hat mit den physisch-leiblichen Kräften, die von den Eltern und Voreltern herrühren. Sie können fragen, wie weiß man, wenn da ein Geistig-Seelisches für die Anschauung durch Inspiration auftritt, dass das das Geistig-Seelische der Seele ist vor der Konzeption.

Nun - meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden —, ich kann dasjenige, was hier in unmittelbarem Erlebnis sich vor die Seele stellt, nur durch einen Vergleich erläutern. Derjenige, der die Erinnerung an ein Erdenerlebnis hat, der hat jetzt ein Bild vielleicht von dem, was er vor zehn Jahren erlebt hat. Er weiß durch den Inhalt dieses Bildes, dass er nicht etwas in der Seele hat, was unmittelbar veranlasst ist durch ein Ereignis der jetzigen Zeit. Er weiß, wie er hingewiesen wird durch den Inhalt des Bildes auf etwas, was vor zehn Jahren war. So ist der Inhalt desjenigen, was man jetzt durch das inspirierte Bewusstsein erlebt, so, dass er etwas ganz anderes enthält als dasjenige, was in der sinnlich-physischen Natur vorhanden ist, wo die Seele im Leibe ist. Man erlebt ebenso wie bei der Erinnerung an die Erdenerlebnisse die Zeit mit. Der Eindruck selbst weist darauf hin, dass man es mit dem Vorgeburtlichen beziehungsweise mit dem Leben vor der Konzeption zu tun hat, mit demjenigen Erleben, das die Seele durchgemacht hat in einer rein geistig-seelischen Welt, bevor sie eingetreten ist durch den mütterlichen Leib in das Physisch-Sinnliche, das sie umkleidet dann im Erdenleben.

Nun — meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden —, dann, nachdem es bis zu dieser Stufe der inspirierten Erkenntnis gekommen ist, und damit die Unsterblichkeitsfrage nach der einen Seite sich eröffnet hat, in Bezug auf eine gewisse Lösung sich eröffnet hat, nämlich nach der Seite des Ungeborenseins, kann nun durch andere Übungen wiederum erkenntnismäßig, die andere Seite der Unsterblichkeitsfrage ins Auge gefasst werden. Und das kann nur geschehen durch gewisse Willensübungen. Genaueres finden Sie wiederum in den genannten beiden Büchern. Ich will aber das Prinzipielle Ihnen hier angeben.

Der Wille des Menschen denkt nicht. Er ist unähnlich dem gewöhnlichen Denken. Das gewöhnliche Denken ist eben innerlich erregt durch die äußeren Eindrücke. Der Wille des Menschen stammt aus dem Innern des Organismus selber, aber wir erleben im gewöhnlichen Leben diesen Willen doch nur auf eine ganz besondere Art. Nehmen Sie den einfachsten Willensentschluss oder Willensimpuls. Nehmen Sie an einfach eine Armbewegung, eine Handbewegung, die auf einen Willensimpuls hin ausgeführt wird. Was haben Sie denn eigentlich in diesem Willensimpuls für das Bewusstsein gegeben? Man überlegt sich das gewöhnlich nicht. Für eine geordnete Forschung muss man einen sicheren Ausgangspunkt haben. Dasjenige, was wir zunächst haben, ist der Gedanke: Wir wollen den Arm, die Hand heben, bewegen. Wie aber dann dieser Gedanke untertaucht in die Organisation, wie er erregt die Muskeln, ergreift die Knochen, wie innerhalb der Organisation sich das entfaltet, was Wille ist, davon weiß im gewöhnlichen Bewusstsein der Mensch nichts. Er sieht erst wiederum durch einen äußeren Eindruck, über den er sich einen Gedanken machen kann, den erhobenen Arm, die erhobene Hand. Was zwischen dem ersten Gedanken, der die Arm- oder Handbewegung intendiert, und dem letzten Eindruck, was dazwischen ist, von dem muss man sagen: Wenn man wirklich innere Seelenerkenntnis übt, das entzieht sich ebenso dem Bewusstsein, wie sich das seelische Erleben entzieht dem Bewusstsein vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen, mit Ausnahme der aus dem Schlafe heraufwogenden, chaotischen Träume.

Man kann sagen: Nur in Bezug auf das Vorstellungsund Denkleben ist der Mensch eigentlich vollständig wach, das Willenselement schließt eine Art Schlafensleben auch im Wachzustand ein. Und so paradox es klingt, es muss ausgesprochen werden: Zwischen dem Gedanken, der einen Willensimpuls zum Ziel hat, und der ausgeführten Handlung ist ein solcher Übergang, der sich durchaus vergleichen lässt mit Einschlafen und Aufwachen. Der Gedanke schläft hinüber in das unbekannte Willensgebiet und wacht wieder auf, indem wir beobachten die ausgeführte Handlung. Je weiter man in die Geheimnisse der Willensentwicklung eindringt — ich kann das nur andeutend erwähnen —, desto mehr kommt man darauf, dass wirklich zwischen diesen zwei angedeuteten Gebieten, dem Gedanken der Absicht und dem Gedanken, der die Beobachtung der Ausführung wiedergibt, dass da wirklich im Wachzustande eine Art Schlaf im Menschen vorhanden ist. Da wird dann eine große Veränderung in Bezug auf den Willen durch Übungen herbeigeführt, durch gewisse Willensübungen.

Aus der großen Reihe der in meinen Büchern angegebenen Willensübungen will ich einige hervorheben. Zum Beispiel kann man den Willen üben gerade indem man ihn am Denken heranschult. Im Seelenleben ist es ja so, dass die einzelnen Fähigkeiten, Denken, Fühlen und Wollen, die wir unterscheiden müssen im abstrakten Denken, wenn wir etwas beschreiben wollen von der Seele, in Wirklichkeit nicht so auseinanderliegen, sondern dass die eine Fähigkeit in die andere hineinspielt. So spielt der Wille in das Denken hinein, indem wir Gedanken verbinden und sie wieder trennen und so weiter. Nun kann man eine Willensübung machen, indem man willkürlich dasjenige, was man sonst gewöhnt ist, vorwärts zu denken anhand der äußeren Tatsachen, dass man das rückwärts denkt. Zum Beispiel, dass man denkt ein Drama vom fünften bis zum ersten Akt rückwärts, also die letzten Ereignisse des fünften Aktes zurück bis zu den ersten Ereignissen des ersten Aktes, oder die letzte Seite eines Gedichtes, einer Melodie rückwärts empfindet in Gedanken. Oder auch eine Übung, die besonders vorteilhaft ist, kann diese sein, dass man des Abends die Erlebnisse des Tages im Auszuge recht anschaulich vor der Seele vorüberziehen lässt, aber indem man mit dem letzten Ereignis abends beginnt und gegen den Morgen fortschreitet. Man muss dabei die einzelnen Dinge möglichst atomistisch nehmen. Man muss so weit gehen, dass man das Hinaufgehen einer Treppe als Hinuntergehen vorstellt, rückwärts von der obersten zur untersten Stufe und so weiter. Und je mehr man in einer solchen Weise, in einer ganz ungewohnten, nicht an die Tatsachen sich anschließenden Art sich Vorstellungen bildet, desto mehr reißt man den Willen, der gewohnt ist, passiv sich den äußeren Tatsachen zu überlassen, los von den äußeren Tatsachen und auch von der physischen Leiblichkeit.

Man kann sich dann unterstützen, wenn man solche Übungen gemacht hat, durch andere Übungen, die ich nennen möchte: Übungen ernster Selbstschau und Selbsterziehung. Man muss es seinerzeit dahin bringen können, dass man die eigenen Handlungen, die eigenen Willensimpulse so von außen beurteilt, wie man die Handlungen und Willensimpulse einer anderen Persönlichkeit objektiv beurteilt. Man muss gewissermaßen, in Bezug auf seine Willensentschließungen und Handlungen, sein eigener, objektiver Zuschauer werden können. Ja, man muss noch weiter gehen können. Wenn man das Leben betrachtet — man weiß ja, wie man im Laufe der Jahre ein anderer geworden ist. Jeder weiß, wie er vor zehn Jahren in Bezug auf seine gesamte seelische Stimmung und Seelenverfassung ein anderer geworden ist. Aber dasjenige, was da im Verlaufe der Jahre aus uns gemacht worden ist, das Leben hat es gemacht, die äußere Wirklichkeit. Man muss nur unbefangen diese Dinge anschauen und sehen, wie der Mensch sich passiv dieser äußeren Wirklichkeit hingibt. Der Mensch kann nun, gerade damit er den Weg in die höheren Welten hineinfindet, Selbsterziehung in aktiver Art üben. Er kann gewissermaßen seine Selbsterziehung so in die Hand nehmen, dass er sich vornimmt: Diese Gewohnheit legst du ab. Alle Kräfte verwendet er darauf, eine Gewohnheit abzulegen oder eine andere Eigenschaft sich einzuverleiben. Gelingt einem das durch die eigene Zucht, was einem sonst nur das Leben gibt, dann kommt man allmählich zu dem, was Loslösung des Willens von der physischen Leiblichkeit ist. Und etwas tritt ein, was ich jetzt wiederum — ich möchte sagen — nur paradox charakterisieren kann. Weil ja diese Dinge dem heutigen Denken noch ungewohnt sind, klingen sie paradox. Sie sind aber durchaus sichere Ergebnisse des anthroposophischen Erkenntnisweges, der in der Art, wie ich es heute schildere, behufs Eintretens in die höheren Welten eingeschlagen werden kann.

Vergleichen Sie, meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden — wie gesagt, es wird sonderbar klingen —, ein Auge, dessen Glaskörper getrübt ist, das Star-krank ist, das gewissermaßen durch Undurchsichtigkeit uns zum Sehen nicht dienen kann, vergleichen Sie das mit einem Auge, das völlig gesund und durchsichtig ist. Ich möchte sagen, gerade dadurch, dass dieses Auge sich nicht durch seine eigene physische Leiblichkeit bemerkbar macht, sondern dass es selbstlos in unseren Organismus eingegliedert ist, gerade dadurch dient es uns zum Sehen für das gewöhnliche Leben, nicht auf ungesunde, sondern für dieses gewöhnliche Leben durchaus gesunde Art. Es soll nicht etwas Abstraktes, Ungesundes im gewöhnlichen Leben gesucht werden, wodurch man die höheren Welten erreichen kann. Für das gewöhnliche Leben ist unser ganzer physischer Organismus gewissermaßen ein solches großes undurchsichtiges Auge. Und durch solche Willensübungen wird unser ganzer Organismus durchsichtig gemacht. Der Wille wird vergeistigt.

Wir dringen ein in dasjenige, was zwischen den beiden Gedanken liegt, dem Gedanken, der das Ziel sich setzt einer Handlung, und dem Gedanken der zuletzt beobachteten Handlung. Wir dringen ein, indem wir unseren Organismus gewissermaßen für die Seele voll durchsichtig machen, in eine geistige Welt dadurch. Das ist es. Wie das Auge für sich selber nicht da ist im Organismus, so wird der ganze physische Organismus nicht da sein, wenn diese Willensübungen fortgesetzt werden, er wird gewissermaßen durchsichtig. Und wie der physische Organismus dasjenige ist, was in seinen Instinkten, in seinen Trieben, in seinen Emotionen, seinen ganzen organischen Vorgängen, unsere Willensimpulse auffängt und sie undurchsichtig macht, gewissermaßen in Schlafzustand versenkt, so wird jetzt alles durchsichtig, wie durch den durchsichtigen Glaskörper des Auges alles durchsichtig wird, was eben im Auge Materielles ist.

Und dadurch, dass wir gewissermaßen unseren ganzen physischen Organismus als durchsichtiges Sinnesorgan gestaltet haben, dadurch haben wir jetzt ausgebildet zu einer höheren Stufe hin eine Seelenkraft, die, wie ich weiß, von vielen nicht gern als Erkenntniskraft hingenommen wird. Sie soll auch nicht als Erkenntniskraft gelten, so wie sie im gewöhnlichen Leben ist, aber sie wird eben höher entwickelt, und da wird sie zu einer Erkenntniskraft. Ich meine die Kraft der Liebe. Die Kraft der Liebe, sie ist im gewöhnlichen Leben dasjenige, was uns als Menschen erst als soziale Wesen vor allen Dingen wertvoll macht. Die Liebe ist die beste, die schönste Kraft des alltäglichen Lebens, im Einzelnen und als soziale Liebe. Wenn sie so gesteigert wird, wie sie durch die genannten Willensübungen gesteigert werden kann, wenn diese Willensübungen unseren Organismus in der geschilderten Weise durchsichtig machen, dann wird die Liebe zu einer höheren Stufe entwickelt. Wir entwickeln die Kraft, überzugehen in das objektiv Geistige, und die dritte Erkenntnisstufe tritt ein, diejenige der wahren Intuition, die ich genannt habe: intuitive Erkenntnis. Das Wort Intuition verwendet man auch im gewöhnlichen Leben — ich werde darauf zurückkommen —, aber nicht so, wie im gewöhnlichen Leben, sondern in dieser entwickelten Form, wie ich es auseinandergesetzt habe, gebrauche ich das Wort intuitive Erkenntnis. Das ist eine Erkenntnis, wo der Mensch im Geistigen drinnensteht, nachdem er seinen Leib gewissermaßen durchsichtig gemacht hat, zum Sinnesorgan umgewandelt hat.

Und durch diese Erkenntnis - meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden — tritt nun noch ein anderes ein in das Bewusstsein der Seele: Jetzt erkennen wir, wie der Mensch leben kann in dem frei gewordenen Willen, unabhängig von der Leiblichkeit. Der Mensch lebt gewissermaßen mit den Gedanken, die er erst verstärkt hat, die er mit seinem Willen verbindet, er lebt außerhalb des Leibes. Das aber gibt das Erkenntnisabbild des Todesvorganges. Dasjenige, was im Tode wirklich geschieht, dass sich das Geistig-Seelische loslöst vom physischen Leibe und ein eigenes Dasein [weiter] führt in der geistig-seelischen Welt, nachdem der Mensch durch die Pforte des Todes geschritten ist, das wird im Bilde, im Erkenntnis-Abbild geschaut durch die intuitive Erkenntnis, indem wir erst unseren ganzen Organismus durch Willenskultur zum Sinnesorgan gemacht haben. So setzt sich Unsterblichkeit aus Ungeborenheit und aus der eigentlichen Unsterblichkeit, aus der Tatsache zusammen, dass die Seele im leiblichen Tode nicht untergehen kann. Aus Ungeborensein und Unsterblichkeit setzt sich zusammen die Ewigkeit der Menschenseele. Geschaut werden kann sie durch wirkliche anthroposophische Forschung. Das soll zunächst darauf hinweisen, wie der Mensch sein eigenes Ewiges, sein Unsterbliches durch Anschauung erkennen lernt.

Aber indem der Mensch also sein eigenes, seelischgeistiges Wesen erkennen lernt, lernt er auch die geistig-seelische Umwelt erkennen. Er lernt durch die inspirierte und intuitive Erkenntnis die geistig-seelische Welt kennen, in der die Menschenseele vor der Konzeption und nach [dem] Tode lebt, als eine Welt wirklicher geistiger Wesenheiten. So wie als eine Welt voll sinnlicher Wesenheiten die sinnliche Welt vor uns ausgebreitet liegt, die wir mit den Sinnen wahrnehmen, so liegt vor der Seele, die sich selber erlebt in ihrem geistig-seelischen Dasein, eine geistig-seelische Welt ausgebreitet, aus der wir herausgetreten sind mit der Konzeption und durch die Geburt und in die wir wieder eintreten mit dem Tode, Und so wie unsere eigene Leiblichkeit abfällt von uns, so fällt ab dasjenige, was an Sinnlich-Leiblichem uns verbunden hat mit den anderen Menschen, und wir finden uns mit den anderen Menschen, unserem geistig-seelischen Sein nach, wiederum zusammen. Dadurch wird Unsterblichkeit, wird der Aufenthalt in der geistigen Welt zu einem wirklichen Erkenntnisergebnis.

Aber auch diejenige geistig-seelische Welt, die uns fortwährend umgibt, die nicht durch das sich selbst überlassene Denken erforscht werden kann auf dem Wege der Gesetze der Naturerkenntnis, diese geistig-seelische Welt, die in der geistigen Natur verborgen ist, wie die Farben und die Töne, die in der sinnlichen Welt verborgen sind, auch diese Welt tritt für diejenige Anschauung auf, die auf dem angegebenen Wege entwickelt werden kann. Und da — möchte ich sagen - wird von selbst die ganze Natur noch zu etwas anderem, als sie für die sinnliche Anschauung schon ist. Nicht, als ob die äußere Natur ihren materiellen Eigenschaften und Stoffen nach verschwände. Sie bleibt vor der übersinnlichen Erkenntnis voll vorhanden, wie der gesunde Mensch vorhanden bleibt mit dem gesunden Menschenverstande neben der Persönlichkeit, die mit den höheren Erkenntniskräften entwickelt wird. Aber zu der äußeren Natur entwickelt sich sozusagen eine übersinnliche, eine geistige Natur — lassen Sie mich den Widerspruch gebrauchen. Ich will ein einzelnes Beispiel für dieses Geistschauen innerhalb der Natur angeben. Für die gewöhnliche Anschauung und Wissenschaft steht die Sonne im Weltenraum mit ihren Konturen. Wir konstruieren uns die Gestalt dieser Sonne, insofern sie im physischen Raume vorhanden ist und im physischen Raume wirkt, durch die Astronomie, die Astrophysik. Für diejenige Forschung, die sich der höheren Fähigkeiten bedient, die ich geschildert habe, wird die Sonne noch etwas ganz anderes. Da lernt man erkennen, wie dasjenige, was als physischer Sonnenleib im Raume vorhanden ist, eben nur der Leib ist für ein Geistiges, aber dieses Geistige erfüllt allen uns zugänglichen Raum. Das Sonnenhafte erfüllt den uns zugänglichen Raum, geht als eine Kraftströmung durch Mineralien, Pflanzen, durch Tiere und durch unsere menschliche Organisation. Es ist gleichsam konsolidiert oder konzentriert in diesem äußeren Räumlich-Physischen des Sonnenkörpers, aber das Sonnenhafte ist überall vorhanden.

Und wie wir die äußere Natur kennenlernen, indem wir sie in abstrakten Gedanken wiedergeben, indem die äußere Natur in den Bildern fortlebt, lebt die geistige Grundlage der Natur tiefer in unserer geistigen Menschenwesenheit fort. Verfolgen wir unsere abstrakten Gedanken in unserm Innern. Sie sind Bilder der äußeren sinnlichen Natur. Verfolgen wir dasjenige, was geistig in der Außenwelt ist, schauen wir das Sonnenhafte in unserem eigenen Innern, dann lernen wir erst unsere Organisation kennen. Dann finden wir dieses Sonnenhafte in der eigenen Menschennatur, in all den Kräften, die vorzugsweise stark wirken, während wir im Wachstum sind, die die Kräfte sind, die uns in unserer Jugend durchdringen, die die Kräfte sind, die vorzugsweise von unserem Gehirn ausgehen, die plastisch, namentlich während der ersten Kindheit, an unserem physischen Organismus aufbauend wirken. Wir lernen die Sonnenhaftigkeit in unserem eigenen Organismus kennen, und wir lernen jedes einzelne Organ, Herz, Lunge, Gehirn und so weiter kennen, insofern in ihnen enthalten ist eine besondere Ausgestaltung der Sonnenkräfte. Und wir lernen jedes einzelne Organ kennen in Bezug auf seine aufbauenden Gestaltungskräfte, indem wir seinen Zusammenhang mit dem Sonnenhaften kennenlernen. Und ich schrecke nicht davor zurück, die Dinge, die heute den Menschen noch paradox, vielleicht fantastisch vorkommen, die aber sichere Ergebnisse der anthroposophischen Forschung sind, wenigstens prinzipiell zu schildern.

Ebenso, wie wir das Sonnenhafte kennenlernen, so lernen wir das Mondenhafte kennen. Den physischen Mond lernen wir mit seinen physischen Konturen kennen. Aber das Mondenhafte erfüllt wiederum den ganzen uns zugänglichen Weltenraum, greift ein in alle Reiche der Natur, greift ein in das Pflanzliche, Mineralische, Tierische, greift ein auch in unsere physische Organisation. Wir lernen erkennen im ganzen Menschen das innere Wirken der mondenhaften Kräfte, der abbauenden Kräfte, derjenigen Kräfte, die besonders tätig sind, wenn wir in absteigender, in alternder Entwicklung sind. Aber diese Abbaukräfte sind ja im Ernährungsprozess, ebenso wie die Sonnenkräfte, in der Jugend und im Alter immer tätig; wir lernen das Hereinströmen des ganzen Kosmos in den Menschen kennen. Dadurch aber lernen wir alles dasjenige, was im Menschen vorhanden ist von Prozessen, kennen. Wir lernen den Zusammenhang des Kosmos mit der menschlichen Wesenheit kennen. Und so, wie ich das Prinzipielle für das Sonnenhafte und Mondenhafte darstellen konnte, so kann es auch für anderes im Kosmos dargestellt werden. Ein intimeres Verhältnis, als es die gewöhnliche Wissenschaft und das gewöhnliche Leben kennt, lernt man zwischen dem Menschen und dem Geiste der Natur im Kosmos auf diese Weise kennen.

Damit aber — meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden — bin ich zugleich an dem Punkte, wo ich besprechen darf, wie Anthroposophie nun, trotzdem sie sich als auf die geschilderte Weise entstandene übersinnliche Wissenschaft entwickelt hat, wie sie dem Leben und den einzelnen Wissenschaften, wie sie dem praktischen Leben überhaupt, in allen Gebieten des Daseins entgegenkommen kann. Da muss ich zunächst darauf hinweisen, wie der Mensch in ganz anderem Sinne erkenntnismäßig durchsichtig wird dadurch, dass man ihn also in seinem Verhältnis zum Kosmos durchschaut. Schon der physische Mensch wird eine Summe von Prozessen. Dasjenige, was uns sonst als abgeschlossenes Herz, als abgeschlossene Lunge, als abgeschlossenes Gehirn erscheint, das verwandelt sich in einer Weise, wie man es vorher nicht ahnt, in Prozesse, in ein Werdendes. Man lernt erkennen, wie in jedem Organ auf andere Art die Aufbau- und die Abbaukräfte enthalten sind. Eine geistige Physiologie, eine geistige Biologie kann aufgebaut werden.

Aber vor allen Dingen erweisen sich fruchtbar diese Erkenntnisse auf dem Gebiete der Medizin, für die Pathologie, die Therapie, für die Heilkunde überhaupt. Derjenige, der in dieser Weise den menschlichen Organismus durchschaut, der lernt auch die abnormen aufbauenden Kräfte, das heißt die Wucherungskräfte, die Wucherungsprozesse im menschlichen Organismus kennen. Und er lernt auch die abnormen abbauenden Kräfte, die Entzündungsprozesse und so weiter in ihrem Zusammenhang kennen. Und man lernt erkennen zum Beispiel für einen abnormen Aufbau, das heißt für einen Wucherungsprozess, den entgegengesetzten Prozess, auch durch das Zusammenwirken von Sonnen- und Mondenhaftem. Man lernt erkennen in einer Pflanze, in einem Mineral, das entsprechende Heilmittel. Man lernt erkennen, wie ein Wucherungsprozess im menschlichen Organismus einem Abbauprozess in einer Pflanze, in einem Mineral entspricht, und Ähnliches. Kurz, von dem bloßen Probieren in Bezug auf die Heilmittel kommt man zu einem durchsichtigen Erkennen, wie all dasjenige, was in der Natur ausgebreitet ist, durch die Aufbauprozesse und Abbauprozesse, durch die anderen kosmischen Prozesse, die in allen Wesen wirken, wiederum im menschlichen Organismus weiterwirkt.

Wenn man das im Einzelnen darstellt, dann wirkt es ebenso befruchtend, dass es tatsächlich möglich geworden ist, dass eine ganze Anzahl von Ärzten sich angeregt gefühlt hat, eine solche rationelle Medizin wirklich aufzunehmen, wie sie befruchtet werden kann durch anthroposophische Geistesforschung. In Dornach, in der Nähe von Basel, und auch in Stuttgart, befindet sich bereits ein medizinisch-therapeutisches Institut, geleitet von Fachärzten, die aber in die medizinischen Gebiete dasjenige befruchtend aufnehmen, was durch anthroposophische Forschung aus geistigen Untergründen zu demjenigen hinzugefügt werden kann, was äußere Naturforschung über den menschlichen Leib und die Heilmittel zu erkunden in der Lage ist. Das muss vor allen Dingen gesagt werden: Weder auf diesem Gebiete noch auf irgendeinem anderen Gebiete strebt Anthroposophie irgendwie nach einer ungerechtfertigten Opposition gegen die wirklich berechtigte Wissenschaftlichkeit der heutigen Zeit. Im Gegenteil, Anthroposophie, wenn sie richtig verstanden wird, muss gerade aufbauen auf Wissenschaftlichkeit, auf wirklich strenger Wissenschaftlichkeit. Nicht bekämpft werden soll irgendwie dasjenige, was anerkannte Medizin ist, sondern einzig und allein fortgebildet soll es werden. Und dass es fortgebildet werden kann, das wird eben, wie gesagt, in einem verhältnismäßig doch großen Kreise von Ärzten anerkannt. Und wenn dieser Kreis auch nur relativ groß ist, so wird er sich schon erweitern, denn gerade daran werden die weitesten Kreise der Menschen Interesse haben, dass erkannt werden kann, wie vom Geiste heraus neue Heilkräfte, neue Heilmethoden gefunden werden können. Das ist ein Gebiet, wo Anthroposophie befruchtend wirken kann auf das Leben. Ein anderes Gebiet ist das künstlerische. Meine verehrten Anwesenden, Anthroposophie besteht ja schon seit Jahrzehnten. An einem bestimmten Zeitpunkte konnte eine Anzahl von Freunden der anthroposophischen Weltanschauung die Notwendigkeit empfinden, ein eigenes Heim dieser Anthroposophie zu bauen. Durch Verhältnisse, auf die ich nicht weiter eingehen kann, wurde dieses Heim gebaut —- es ist noch nicht ganz fertig — in der Nähe von Basel. Dieses Heim, wie wäre es aus einer anderen geistigen Bewegung heraus gebaut worden? Nun, wenn ein solches notwendig gewesen wäre in einer anderen geistigen Bewegung, so hätte man sich an einen Baumeister gewandt, der hätte aus antikem oder Renaissance- oder Rokoko- oder romanischem oder gotischem Stil heraus oder in einem Gemisch dieser Stilarten einen Bau geschaffen, der eine äußere Umrahmung geworden wäre für dasjenige, was durch Anthroposophie zu treiben ist. So kann Anthroposophie nicht auftreten. Anthroposophie will nicht irgendeine Theorie, nicht irgendetwas, was allein mit dem Intellekt, mit dem menschlichen Kopfe zu tun hat und in jeder Weise eingerahmt werden kann durch irgendeinen Bau. Anthroposophie will auf den ganzen Menschen wirken, wie sie aus dem ganzen Menschen herauskommt. Wie sie gewissermaßen den ganzen Menschen zum Sinnesorgan macht, wie geschildert. So kommt alles, was durch sie in der Welt auftritt, aus dem ganzen, aus dem Vollmenschen heraus. Und wie das Künstlerische, das zu ihr gestaltet werden soll, gestaltet werden muss, ich will es durch einen Vergleich klarmachen. Wenn Sie eine Nussschale haben, sie ist in einer gewissen Weise gefurcht und gerundet. Die Gesetze, nach denen sie gefurcht und gerundet ist, sind dieselben, nach denen der Nusskern gebildert ist. Man kann sich nicht denken, dass nach anderen Gesetzen die Schale gebildet ist als der Kern der Nuss. So ist es, wenn Anthroposophie bauen, malen, bildhauern soll, um sich eine Umrahmung zu schaffen. Da muss gewissermaßen aus denselben Gesetzen heraus alles Künstlerische fließen, aus denen heraus die Ideen fließen, die vom Podium herunter aus dem Schauen der geistigen Welt verkündet werden. Daher wurde nicht ein gewöhnlicher, bestehender Baustil genommen, sondern es wurde ein neuer Baustil gebildet. Er mag noch so unvollkommen als möglich sein, und diejenigen, die ihn tadeln, mögen recht haben. Es ist ein erster Anhub, ein erster Anfang. Aber dasjenige, was angestrebt werden musste, kann ja so charakterisiert werden, dass man sagt: In Dornach musste jede Wandgestaltung, jede Säule, jedes Bildhauerwerk, jede Malerei dasselbe offenbaren, was gesagt wird, wenn in Ideen vom Podium herunter im Dornacher Bau dasjenige, das verkündet wird als Anthroposophie, was in höheren Welten durch unmittelbare Anschauung erkundet werden kann. Das gesprochene Wort ist nur eine andere Form dessen, was künstlerisch als Umrahmung wirken soll. Alles ist wirklich in künstlerische Formen ausgeflossen. Und dabei ist nicht irgendein einziges Symbolum, eine einzige Allegorie, wie manche glauben, in Dornach vorhanden.

Und man kann sehen, trotzdem alles unvollkommen ist, wie das im Anfang ja nötig ist, man kann sagen: Die Goethe’sche Kunstauffassung, die Goethe’sche Kunstempfindung, sie darf heute gesehen werden in einem solchen Wollen, wenn sich dieses Wollen auch noch recht weit vom Gelingen weiß. Denn, was sagt Goethe gerade da, wo er in der intimsten, tiefsten Weise einmal seine Kunstempfindung, seine Kunstanschauung zum Ausdruck bringen wollte? Er sagte: Die Kunst ist eine Manifestation geheimer Naturgesetze, die ohne sie niemals offenbar würden. - Und einen anderen bedeutsamen Ausspruch hat Goethe getan: Wem die Natur ihre intimsten Geheimnisse zu enthüllen beginnt, der empfindet eine tiefe Sehnsucht nach ihrer würdigsten Auslegerin, der Kunst. — Diese Sehnsucht empfindet man aber am meisten dann, wenn man den Geist, der in der Natur wirkt, durch übersinnliches Schauen in seine Seele hinein geoffenbart erhält. Da erhält man nicht symbolische abstrakte Allegorien, sondern wirkliche Geistgestaltung, die auch Materialgefühl hat und die sich als wirklich Künstlerisches den einzelnen Stoffen einverleiben kann. So wirkt befruchtend auf das künstlerische Gebiet in allen Formen dasjenige, was Anthroposophie ist.

Und ein [Drittes], wo es sich zeigt, wie Anthroposophie befruchtende und neugestaltende Impulse für das Leben gibt, ist die Freie Waldorfschule in Stuttgart, die von Emil Molt begründet wurde und von mir geleitet wird. Diese Waldorfschule will eine Schule sein, in der man nicht etwa Anthroposophie als Weltanschauung der Seele des Kindes aufpfropft. Das liegt uns in der Waldorfschule gänzlich fern. Es handelt sich in der Waldorfschule darum, gerade dasjenige, was Anthroposophie geben kann, in unmittelbare Geschicklichkeit, in pädagogisch-didaktische Geschicklichkeit umzusetzen. In der Waldorfschule handelt es sich nicht darum, den Kindern anthroposophische Ideen in der Schule einzuimpfen, was wir dadurch beweisen, dass wir den evangelischen Religionsunterricht von evangelischen, den katholischen Religionsunterricht von katholischen Seelsorgern erteilen lassen, und dass wir nur für die Dissidentenkinder einen eigenen, freien Religionsunterricht geschaffen haben, der aber auch nicht etwa bloß in Religion umgesetzte Anthroposophie sein will.

Allein dadurch, dass Anthroposophie liefert in der Weise, wie ich es geschildert habe, eine wirkliche Erkenntnis des ganzen Menschen, des Vollmenschen nach Leib, Seele und Geist, dadurch, dass Anthroposophie gibt eine wirkliche Menschenerkenntnis, zunächst für das Kind, dadurch liefert sie die geistgemäße Grundlage, um wirklich auszuführen dasjenige, was an großen pädagogischen und didaktischen Maximen durch die großen Pädagogen des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts ja vorhanden ist. Auch da will anthroposophische Forschung nicht in Gegensatz, nicht in Opposition treten zu dem Guten, was schon da ist, allein man braucht für die pädagogischdidaktische Praxis wirkliche Menschenerkenntnis. Und es ist möglich, wenn man den ganzen Menschen nach Leib und Seele und Geist voll erkennt, für jedes Lebensjahr, ja für jeden Lebensmonat des Kindes, aus der kindlichen Natur selber abzulesen den Lehrplan, die Lehrziele. Es ist möglich, alles herauszuholen durch eine wahre, wirkliche Menschenerkenntnis aus dem Menschen selber. Praktisch will Anthroposophie wirken in Pädagogik und Didaktik. Nicht abstrakte, neue Grundsätze — die sind genügend vorhanden — will sie aufstellen, sondern gerade die Erziehungspraxis will sie beeinflussen. Und dass man das kann, dass man wirkliche Lehrpläne und Lehrziele nicht durch abstrakte Grundsätze oder durch Majoritätsbeschlüsse aufstellt, sondern, dass man sie ablesen kann aus der Natur des werdenden Menschen selber für jeden Monat, für jedes Jahr, das kann man schon sehen, nachdem man in der Waldorfschule einige Zeit diese anthroposophische Praxis ausgeübt hat. Also nur in pädagogische, in didaktische Praxis, nicht in die Weltanschauung der Kinder, will dasjenige einfließen, was durch die Waldorfschule gewollt wird.

Und um noch als Letztes zu erwähnen einige andere Gebiete, möchte ich darauf aufmerksam machen, dass Anthroposophie durchaus, indem sie hinweist auf den ganzen Menschen mit ihren Erkenntnissen, auch auf das soziale Leben befruchtend wirken kann. Wir haben ja gesehen, wie die einseitige Anwendung der naturwissenschaftlichen Denkweise doch ihre Grenzen hat und eben an das wahre Wesen des Menschen nicht heran kann, wie diese Anschauungsweise, wenn sie in die sozialen Impulse hineinfließt, zerstörend wirken muss. Ich glaube nicht, dass in weitesten Kreisen schon genug unbefangenes Urteil vorhanden ist, um einzusehen, wie zerstörend im Osten Europas für die gesamte Menschheitskultur dasjenige ist, was eben aus dieser Anschauung des bloßen Natürlichen für das soziale Leben als soziale Impulse praktische Wirklichkeit und zu gleicher Zeit verwirklichte Illusionen geworden sind. Und wie eine große Drohung schwebrt über der ganzen gegenwärtigen Zivilisation dasjenige, was seinen zerstörenden Anfang im Osten Europas genommen hat.

Wird man auch die sozialen Impulse dadurch vertiefen, dass man nicht äußerlich auf das Instinktive, das bloße Natürliche im Menschen sieht, und gewissermaßen die menschliche Freiheitshandlung nur als höhere Instinkte auffasst, wird man die wahre Freiheit des Menschen im Geist erkennen können, wie ich sie versucht habe zu schildern aus solchen anthroposophischen Prinzipien heraus in meiner im Beginn der neunziger Jahre des vorigen Jahrhunderts herausgegebenen «Philosophie der Freiheit», dann wird auch eine Summe von sozialen Impulsen entstehen, die den ganzen Menschen wiederum neben den ganzen Menschen hinstellen und die korrigierend, vergeistigend wirken können auf dasjenige, was heute in so zerstörender Weise, wie ein drohendes Gespenst der Zukunft, über der menschlichen Zivilisation schwebt.

Wie aus Pädagogik heraus und aus dem sozialen Leben heraus gesund gedacht werden kann, das hat sich gezeigt — ich möchte nur diese zwei Beispiele aus vielen anführen. Im Sommer des verflossenen Jahres, wo wir in Stuttgart den ersten anthroposophischen Kongress abhielten. Dr. Caroline von Heydebrand, eine Lehrkraft der Waldorfschule, hat dargelegt, wie die äußere experimentelle Pädagogik, die durchaus nicht bekämpft werden soll in ihrer Berechtigung, die aber doch nur etwas Äußerliches bietet, in der rechten Weise ergänzt werden kann durch dasjenige, was als intimes Verhältnis zwischen Mensch und Mensch, auch zwischen dem Lehrer und dem zu Erziehenden auftritt. Der ausgezeichnete Vortrag liegt als Broschüre gedruckt vor, ebenso auf einem anderen Gebiete der Vortrag von Emil Leinhas. Dieser behandelt von anthroposophischen Gesichtspunkten aus dasjenige, was unvollkommen ist an der heutigen Nationalökonomie, unvollkommen vor allen Dingen insofern, als sie unfruchtbar bleibt für das wirkliche soziale Leben. Anthroposophische Volkswirtschaftslehre, sie wird etwas Praktisches sein, sie wird praktische soziale Motive abgeben können. Insofern ist auch ein günstiges Vorzeichen für die Zukunft die Broschüre von Emil Leinhas: Der Bankrott der Nationalökonomie.

Nun - meine sehr verehrten Anwesenden —, das sind so einzelne Beispiele, an denen sich zeigt, wie Anthroposophie befruchtend für das Leben wirken kann. Man findet ja, wenn man das ethische, das moralische, das sittliche Leben in der unbefangenen Weise betrachtet, wie ich es versucht habe zu betrachten und auf eine sichere Grundlage zu stellen in dem genannten Buche «Die Philosophie der Freiheit», den Begriff der Intuition. Ich konnte zeigen in dieser «Philosophie der Freiheit», wie dasjenige, was im moralischen Gewissen lebt, einfach durch eine unbewusste Intuition des reinen Denkens, durch eine unbewusste moralische Intuition hereingenommen ist aus geistigen Welten. Die wahren, aus dem Gewissen heraufsteigenden moralischen Impulse sind moralische Intuitionen aus der geistigen Welt, die dann in ihrer Wahrheit erst gefunden werden durch die inspirativen und intuitiven Erkenntnisse, wie ich sie heute von anthroposophischen Gesichtspunkten aus geschildert habe.

So kommt denn Anthroposophie mit ihren Erkenntnissen entgegen auch den intimsten, den wichtigsten Empfindungs- und Gefühlsmomenten der menschlichen Seele, vor allem der religiösen Frömmigkeit. Es wäre eine Verleumdung, wenn man die Sache so darstellte, als ob Anthroposophie irgendeine Sekte stiften oder eine neue Religion begründen wollte. Anthroposophie kann, indem sie auf den Grundlagen der Erkenntnis steht, die ich heute geschildert habe, nichts Sektiererisches an sich haben oder wollen. Sie kann auch keine neue Religion stiften. Aber demjenigen, was die Menschen an Religionen und an religiösen Bedürfnissen haben, dem kann nur entgegengekommen werden im günstigen Sinne, wenn auch die Erkenntnis des Übersinnlichen sich erschließt. Und man sollte glauben, dass gerade die Vertreter der Religionsbekenntnisse eine tiefe Befriedigung erfüllen müsste, wenn in unserer Zeit eine Geistesströmung auftritt, welche von der Erkenntnisseite her dasjenige begründet, was der Glaube sucht. Und eigentlich ist es unverständlich, dass nicht eine Befestigung des religiösen Lebens in Anthroposophie gesehen wird bei den offiziellen Vertretern der Religionsbekenntnisse, sondern oftmals etwas Feindliches. Würden sie Anthroposophie in ihren Grundlagen wirklich erkennen, nicht bloß so obenhin anschauen, so würden sie gerade die festeste Stütze für wirkliche Frömmigkeit, für wirkliches religiöses Leben in dieser Anthroposophie sehen können. Denn, wenn der suchenden Seele entgegenkommt aus übersinnlichen Welten, nicht bloß aus der Sinnenwelt, ein Licht der Erkenntnis, dann erhält der Glaube nicht eine ungünstige Beeinflussung, sondern eine starke Stütze, wie im Moralischen die Seele starke Quellen des Gutseins erhält, wie sie zum moralischen Handeln, Lebenshalt, Lebenssicherheit, Lebensziel erhält, indem sie sich wissen lernt als Glied einer geistigen Welt, wie der äußere Leib Glied einer physischen Welt ist. In diesem Wissen als Glied einer geistigen Welt, wird dem Menschen auch wiederum sein wahrer Menschwert, eine wahre menschenwürdige Ethik und menschenwürdige Sittlichkeit aufgehen können.

Und so, darf ich wohl zusammenfassend in ein paar Sätzen charakterisieren, was ich als das Wesen der Anthroposophie darstellen wollte, nur wie in einem Bilde dasjenige zusammenfassen, was ich in dieser Betrachtung, die ja, trotzdem sie schon lang genug ist, nur ungenügend ist und nur als Einleitung betrachtet werden kann zu dem, was ich sagen wollte über das Wesen der Anthroposophie.

Wir haben vor uns den Menschen. Wir haben ihn seiner physischen Leiblichkeit nach vor uns gestaltet. Wir erkennen ihn erst in seiner ganzen Wesenheit, wenn wir sehen, wie seine Physiognomie die Äußerungen seiner Seele ist, wenn seine Bewegungen werden für uns der Ausdruck und die Offenbarungen des Physisch-Natürlichen seiner Körperlichkeit, und wenn wir das SeelischGeistige durchschimmern sehen durch sein PhysischLeibliches. Wir haben in der Naturwissenschaft — die gerade voll anerkannt wird in ihrem berechtigten Streben von Anthroposophie, mit der Anthroposophie in keinen Gegensatz tritt, die sie nur fortbilden will —, wir haben in dieser Naturwissenschaft gewissermaßen die Erkenntnisse des äußeren Weltenleibes. Wir haben selber eine Art Leibliches in der physisch-sinnlichen Naturerkenntnis und in der intellektualistischen Ausdeutung. So, wie wir den ganzen, den Vollmenschen nur vor uns haben, wenn sich durch sein Leiblich-Physisches sein Seelisch-Geistiges offenbart, so haben wir die Naturerkenntnis nur ganz vor uns, wenn sie durch alles, was sie an Tatsachen, an Experimenten, an Offenbarungen, an Naturgesetzen uns bietet — gewissermaßen als in einer wunderbaren Physiognomie —, ein Geistig-Seelisches an Welterkenntnis ausdrückt. Und so möchte Anthroposophie dieses sein: Wie der Mensch sich erst ganz und voll ausspricht, wenn sein Geistig-Seelisches durch sein Leiblich-Physisches spricht, so möchte sein für jeden Erkenntnisleib, der in der äußeren Naturwissenschaft gegeben ist, Anthroposophie die Seele, der Geist der wirklichen, der ganzen, der vollen Menschen- und Welterkenntnis.

The Essence of Anthroposophy

Nowadays, one often hears it said that in dark, chaotic times of spiritual life, when souls have lost their courage, confidence, and hope, all kinds of occult or mystical endeavors find fertile ground. And in circles where too little importance is attached to distinctions, the endeavors that call themselves anthroposophy are often counted among such endeavors. Now, this evening's reflection, which will deal with the nature of this anthroposophy, is intended to show you how inaccurate it is to lump anthroposophical research together with many other things with which it is lumped together today.

Anthroposophy, my dear friends, is based entirely on the scientific seriousness and scientific conscientiousness that have developed in the field of natural science over the last three, four, five centuries, but especially in the nineteenth century. However, anthroposophy seeks to extend what can be developed scientifically within certain limits to the point of grasping the so-called supersensible worlds, to the point of grasping those mysteries of existence that above all concern the deepest longings of the human soul itself, the longing to explore the eternal in the human soul and the connection of this soul with the divine-spiritual foundations of existence.

Although anthroposophy is based on scientific principles, since it deals with the great mysteries of existence that are of interest to all human beings, it had to develop in such a way that it meets the understanding of even the simplest human mind, that it meets the practical needs of the human soul and spiritual life, which seek inner support for the soul, security for the soul, strength to act, faith in humanity, in human destiny. And this anthroposophy also had to accommodate the most diverse social and, in particular, religious aspirations in the way I intend to describe this evening, even though it itself — and this must be emphasized again and again — has a scientific starting point. But with regard to this starting point, one would like to say: anthroposophy must take more seriously than many who believe they stand on the firm ground of scientific research today the possibilities that are open to scientific research. And here anthroposophy must above all look at what very prudent scientific thinkers recognize as the limits of natural science.

If we use the research methods of natural science, the observation of the external sensory world, experimentation, and thinking that combines the results of observation and experimentation, and thus [find] the laws of nature as we are accustomed to recognizing them, we simply come to the conclusion that this natural scientific research has its limits, that it cannot actually go beyond the sensory world and its laws, that it cannot comprehend more of the human being than what is taken from this sensory world as human-physical-bodily nature; that it must be modest enough to recognize its limits in relation to what constitutes the actual value, essence, and dignity of the human being; that it must be modest enough not to penetrate the actual spiritual-soul nature of the human being. If anthroposophy wants to be taken seriously, it must consider precisely these things with the necessary conscientiousness. It must clearly see this one pitfall, that one cannot simply arbitrarily go beyond the sensory world with the thinking that one has acquired from natural science. Not arbitrarily, but because this thinking develops its strength and its education through sensory observation and therefore immediately falls into emptiness, into the indefinite, into the unsatisfactory when, left to its own devices, it wants to penetrate into areas that lie beyond the sensory world.

You know, dear audience, that there are certain philosophical speculations through which thinking, left to its own devices, wants to move beyond the sensory to the supersensory. This thinking, left to its own devices, wants to draw all kinds of logical conclusions from the temporal to the eternal. But those who want to satisfy their spiritual needs for the eternal with such logical conclusions will find themselves dissatisfied, for they will soon see that as certain as this thinking is when it considers the beings and phenomena of nature, it becomes uncertain when it wants to go beyond what is accessible to the senses. This is why we have the dispute between the so-called philosophical systems. One, according to its subjective peculiarity, goes beyond the sensory world in this way and establishes this system. The other establishes that system. All of this does not result in a harmonious worldview, but rather in something unsatisfactory. Anthroposophy must clearly demonstrate what an unbiased mind must feel in the face of such self-reliant thinking. And with that, it is given the one cliff that must be passed if the paths are to be opened to the exploration of the eternal in human nature and the eternal in the universe.

Anthroposophy must certainly recognize the limits of knowledge of nature. And on the other hand, anthroposophy must look at how certain deeper minds today see these limits of knowledge of nature and now seek help elsewhere, which cannot come to them from natural science for the great mystery questions of existence. They then seek help in so-called mystical contemplation. They then seek help in what is often called self-contemplation of the soul. Through contemplation of one's own inner being, the soul is supposed to descend into deeper shafts, where it is supposed to discover something other than what can be found through natural science or in ordinary consciousness. But precisely those who are as serious about searching for the eternal as those who adhere to anthroposophy must also see the illusions to which such mystics often succumb in this other way. Anyone who can view human soul life impartially knows what human memory actually means in the overall soul life. Memories are stirred up by external sensory perceptions. That is where we as human beings get our impressions. We then often retrieve the images of such impressions from our memory years later. And it can happen that some external sensory impression has been absorbed by our soul, perhaps half-unconsciously, without us paying the necessary attention to it. It has then been lowered into the deepest depths of the soul life, and it comes back up again arbitrarily or involuntarily after years. And it does not need to come up in the same way that it was sunk into the soul; it can come up transformed, so that only those who are more familiar with the soul life will recognize it. That which is detached in the soul by an external impression is received by all kinds of sensations, feelings, impulses of the will; indeed, it is received internally by the organic, physical constitution of the human being, by the overall constitution of the human body. And after years, it can be brought out of the soul again, completely transformed. And those who are then biased may believe that what is only a transformed sensory impression, which has undergone the most diverse metamorphoses in the soul, is, when brought up through inner contemplation, some kind of revelation of the eternal, which does not originate from the sensory external world. Anthroposophy must recognize how mystics who seek their revelations in this way come to the harshest illusions, and it must acknowledge the second cliff in this mysticism. It must pass the cliff of the limits of knowledge of nature and the cliff of the limits of one's own human soul life.

I had to preface these words — my dear audience — in order to show how conscientiously anthroposophy seeks out all sources of error that may arise. For in what follows, I will have to describe to you the paths that anthroposophy itself takes in order to enter the spiritual, supersensible worlds, and I will have to describe to you many paradoxes that are still quite unfamiliar today. It would be easy to believe — and many do believe — that anthroposophy is nothing more than a more or less fantastical attempt to penetrate worlds with which serious science should have nothing to do. Anthroposophy knows how not to research the spiritual and supersensible. And therefore it can also gain a starting point for how one can really research. By recognizing which paths can lead to illusions and errors, it advances to the actual — I would say — initially anticipatory answer to the question. It says to itself: With the ordinary powers of cognition, as we have them in everyday life, in recognized science, we cannot, because of the limits of natural knowledge, because of the limits of mystical contemplation, go any further than to external nature and to what human beings receive from this external nature into their soul life. So if one wants to go beyond this outer nature, one must appeal to forces of the soul life that lie dormant in the soul in ordinary existence, that are not present at all in ordinary existence, or rather, of which human beings are not aware. Anthroposophy seeks to develop these powers that lie dormant in the soul, so that these newly awakened powers of cognition can then penetrate worlds that cannot be penetrated with ordinary powers of cognition.

Today, serious scientific researchers are already talking about all kinds of abnormal powers of the human soul or the human organism, which are supposed to prove that human beings exist in other contexts than those revealed by ordinary biology or physiology. However, anthroposophy as such has nothing to do with such abnormal forces of the soul life. It addresses the normal forces of the human soul life and merely develops them further. To do this, however, one needs, at the starting point, what I would call intellectual modesty. One must be able to say to oneself: What were you like as a child, as a very small child, when you entered the world with a dreamlike soul life, when you could only imperfectly use your own limbs in this dreamlike soul life, when you could only imperfectly or not at all orient yourself in the world. But from the depths of the human being, through education and through life, those forces could be developed that were initially dormant in the depths of this human organization. Now, in possession of these soul forces that education and life have brought forth, one must say to oneself: other forces may still lie dormant in this human soul, which can be further developed from a certain starting point in life, just as the child's soul forces have been further developed to their present stage of development. However, only practice can teach us that this is the case, and this is where anthroposophical research comes in. And here it is a matter of first looking into the whole of human soul life in order to further develop the individual powers of this soul life as they simply exist in normal existence.

Ladies and gentlemen, we are initially concerned with the human power of thinking, with the formation of thoughts on the one hand; on the other hand, we are concerned with the power of will. Between the two, between the power of thought, which develops from external impressions or from the orientations that life has given us, and the power of will, through which we actively engage in life, lies the mind, the sum of our sensations and feelings. Anthroposophical research will now focus primarily on developing the power of thought and the power of will to a higher level than that which ordinary life provides. For the eternal cannot be explored through external measures, but only through the intimate training of the soul forces themselves. But if the power of thinking on the one hand, and the power of will on the other, are developed further than they are in ordinary life, then what is the deepest and innermost, the most soulful essence of human nature, the power of the mind, will in some way, as we shall see, follow of its own accord. So the first question may be: How can the power of thinking be trained to a higher level of cognition than that which ordinary life represents?

I have now described the ways and exercises in my book “How to Attain Knowledge of Higher Worlds” and in the second part of my “Occult Science” and in other books. Today, I will first outline the principles of training the soul's abilities and then refer to the aforementioned books for details. For an introductory lecture, it must suffice to point out the principles that indicate the actual meaning, the essence of the matter.

What we have as thinking power in ordinary life is based on external sensory impressions. External sensory impressions are alive. We stand before the colorful, sounding world. We receive living impressions. The thoughts that form from these impressions remain in our soul. We rightly call them pale. We know that these thoughts have less intensity in ordinary life than the sensory impressions for the soul life. We also know that the ordinary thoughts that follow the sensory impressions are accepted by people in a more passive way, just as the sensory impressions excite the soul. What is at stake here is that it is precisely the sensory impressions, with the liveliness with which they fill the soul, that are taken as a model for the elevated, energized life of thought itself, which anthroposophy initially seeks to develop for the purposes of its research. The aim is to elevate, intensify, and energize this life of thought in the following way. What I have to describe will seem simple, but on the whole, spiritual science as it is meant here is no simpler than research at the observatory, or in chemical and physical laboratories, or at the clinic. What I am describing today in a simple way requires years or months or weeks, and so on, depending on the aptitude that the individual has for it.

There are many such inner soul exercises. I will only highlight the most characteristic ones. The point is to first become aware of how one actually thinks in everyday life. As strange as it may sound, anyone who looks at their own thinking impartially would have to say that the expression “I think” is not entirely correct. Thinking develops from external things. We only become aware of this because we look back, as it were, on the physical organism, because we see ourselves from the outside, as it were. We only become aware that the thinking that develops is bound to our physical organism, and therefore we say the words “I think.” This “I think” is not entirely justified for ordinary consciousness. Anthroposophical research strives to make it fully justified. It strives to do this, for example, by placing a simple idea or a simple complex of ideas at the center of the consciousness of the entire soul life. This can be done by concentrating the entire soul life on this one idea or this one complex of ideas. It can be achieved through practice. I have described the individual exercises in the books I have already mentioned, which can help you to direct your attention away from everything else that otherwise occupies the soul from outside and inside, and to devote yourself with complete inner arbitrariness, as one otherwise only does with mathematical and computational tasks, with your whole soul to such a simple complex of ideas or a simple idea.

Now it is particularly good — or rather, it should be — not to retrieve such an idea from memory. As I already indicated in the introduction to this lecture, all kinds of experiences are present in memory in a state of change, of metamorphosis. If one simply recalls such an idea from memory, then all kinds of things from the subconscious and unconscious mix into it, and one can never be sure that one has only that in one's consciousness to which one arbitrarily and deliberately directs one's attention. And that is what matters. Therefore, it is good, for example, to look for what you want to focus your attention on somewhere in a book or something similar, as something that is completely new, like a completely new sensory impression, to which you can devote yourself with the liveliness of your soul, and which works solely through itself. Or you can ask someone who is experienced in such matters to give you such a complex of ideas, so that you have something that is completely new to the soul. You must not fear that in this way someone else might gain any suggestive power over the soul. For it is not a matter of any content of ideas acting on the soul, but of the soul itself developing its own powers in the most intense attention. Then the following becomes apparent: just as one can strengthen and invigorate the muscles of an arm by using them in work, so one can intensify, strengthen, and invigorate the power of thought by concentrating it with the utmost attention on a specific complex of ideas and repeating such exercises in rhythmic succession. In this way, one gradually succeeds in making one's own thought life, without relying on sensory impressions, as vivid and intense as the soul's experience in external sensory impressions is otherwise. Whereas one otherwise has only pale thoughts compared to the liveliness of sensory impressions, through these spiritual exercises, which I call meditation and concentration, one must develop a way of thinking that is internally strengthened to the liveliness of sensory impressions.

You can see here at once, my dear audience, that anthroposophical research goes in the opposite direction to the development of certain pathological, diseased human soul states. What human beings develop in visions, hallucinations, through mediumship, through suggestion and the like in hypnosis, goes in exactly the opposite direction to what is the continuation of normal thinking ability in the anthroposophical research method. When a person develops anything that leads them to hallucinations or visions, whereby they become susceptible to suggestion, their soul forces flow away from their sensory impressions, so to speak, and flow down into the human organism. As a hallucinator or visionary, the person becomes more dependent on their organism than they are on external sensory impressions. But it is precisely the nature of the soul experience in external sensory impressions that is the ideal of the anthroposophical path of knowledge that is to be developed. So, above all, by practicing meditation and concentration, with full inner will and arbitrarily developed attention, the human being must be devoted to the soul content that he himself has brought into the center of his consciousness. This brings about something that is fundamentally different from all pathological states of mind, with which the anthroposophical path can only be misunderstood. When a person becomes hallucinatory, visionary, when they enter hypnosis, when they become susceptible to suggestion in some way, their entire personality is submerged in hallucinatory and visionary life. Their ordinary consciousness of common sense disappears into the hallucinatory, visionary experience.

The opposite is the case when a kind of higher consciousness develops through meditation and concentration, performed as I have described. When a person actually achieves a heightened, more intense, and more powerful way of thinking, higher soul forces develop. But the ordinary, level-headed person, as they otherwise are in their life of knowledge and duty, remains fully intact alongside the other, in a sense second, personality. They stand alongside the second personality with the higher faculty of knowledge. They stand alongside it with their ordinary cognitive abilities, controlling and criticizing. This is a fundamental difference that cannot be emphasized enough when speaking of anthroposophical knowledge.

And then, when one strengthens one's thinking in this way through meditation and concentration, one comes to a certain point in one's development where one says to oneself: Now it is really me within myself who is thinking this; now I have experienced my ego to a greater extent in my world of thoughts. Just as I otherwise experience myself in external sensory experiences, I now experience myself in mere thinking. But this thinking is also transformed. In a sense, it no longer looks to the soul's gaze like the ordinary, pale thinking developed for the sensory world. It is no longer abstract thinking, it is experienced thinking. It is intense, like colors and sounds. And one experiences oneself intensely within it. And a point comes when one knows: now one no longer thinks with the help of the physical instrument. For in ordinary thinking, one always thinks with the help of the physical tool; anthroposophy must admit this. Now thinking has detached itself from the nervous system. One knows this through inner experience. One knows when the moment has come that it is the soul within oneself that now lives independently in thoughts, in thoughts that are no longer abstract thoughts, but image-thoughts. Now that the soul is truly experiencing itself spiritually, the first experience occurs at a certain moment when the person is ready for it. The first result of anthroposophical research appears before the soul's gaze, and that is that in a great tableau of life, the entire earthly life up to the moment of birth suddenly appears before the soul. We otherwise have this earthly life accessible to our memory, but initially as a subconscious or unconscious stream within the soul. Arbitrarily or involuntarily, some images of memory can be brought up from time to time from this stream, which goes back to our earliest childhood years. But what lives in the soul as a more or less unconscious stream of memories is not what is meant here when we speak of the life tableau through which we suddenly have before us the inner life of our human experience, insofar as this experience is initially earthly experience. It is not as if we have individual events before us, as presented by memory, but rather we have before us what can be seen as the impulses that give us our abilities, as that which gives us our moral strength from within, but which also directs our growth forces and guides our nutrition from within. We have before us something that I have called in the aforementioned writings the image-forming body, or, if one relies on older [names], which have always been used for such things, the etheric body or life body of the human being.

This is a second, supersensible organization. It cannot be reached by means of ordinary natural science, nor by means of mere logical thinking, but one must have developed what I have characterized as energized thinking and referred to in the aforementioned books as imaginative knowledge, not because it has to do with imagination, but because this thinking lives pictorially in the soul and is itself knowledge. And so, in addition to the spatially limited, outer physical body, one experiences what I would like to call a time body, a body that is in motion, that can be seen at once, like a powerful tableau of life, right before the soul's gaze, containing everything that has shaped us inwardly as far back as we can look in our earthly life. This image-forming body, which is the first component of the higher, supersensible human being, cannot be drawn directly. If one wants to draw it, one must be aware that one is proceeding as if one were painting lightning, which can only be captured for a moment. What one would draw or paint of the etheric body would be like a flash of lightning, captured for just a moment in its everlasting motion.

With this, ladies and gentlemen, we have come to the realization that human beings do not only harbor within themselves the results of physical, chemical, and physiological forces, but through observation we have learned to recognize that human beings carry within themselves something akin to thoughts, something that can be achieved through condensed, strengthened, and empowered thoughts. The first anthroposophical result is that we come to know this first supersensible member of human nature, the formative body, the etheric body, through observation.

In order to progress further, it is now necessary not only to do the concentration and meditation exercises as described, but also to observe how, despite being completely arbitrary with absolute inner composure, like a mathematician who calculates, one can devote oneself to meditation and concentration, how one is nevertheless gradually and completely devoted to that on which one is concentrating, and how one struggles to emerge from that on which the soul has concentrated with the utmost attention. One must therefore do completely different exercises in parallel with these exercises of concentration, all of which boil down to removing from the soul what one has brought into consciousness through arbitrariness, what one has concentrated on, sending it away just as calmly, just as arbitrarily. By doing such exercises of suppressing ideas, which one has first placed at the center of consciousness with all one's strength, for a long time and in rhythmic succession, by doing such exercises for a sufficiently long time, one attains a very special soul capacity, which is now of greater importance for further research. One attains what I would like to call: empty consciousness in a state of complete wakefulness.

My dear friends! What this means will become clear when you consider how human beings—when they have no external impressions, or when they do have them, they are like none at all because they are monotonous or constantly repeated, so that attention is weakened by them—it is well known how human beings then enter into a sleep-like, dull consciousness. It is not possible to create empty consciousness without proper practice. Only by first practicing having strong, powerful thoughts in consciousness and suppressing them does consciousness remain so intense, so awake, that it retains this wakefulness even when it initially has no content. [One must first be able to create this empty consciousness if one wants to go beyond] what is the first result of anthroposophical research, namely to see the inner soul since birth in a tableau.

If one has practiced such exercises in suppressing ideas for a sufficiently long time and has attained a certain state of maturity in this, then one is able to suppress this tableau of life that I have described, even after it has presented itself to the soul. And when one is able to suppress this tableau of life, that is, our entire inner human being, as it presents itself in this earthly life, shaping itself internally in our body as an ever-moving entity, if one suppresses this inner human being, this inner etheric earthly human being — I would like to say — this formative body, and does not fill the consciousness with external impressions, but leaves it empty at first, then the second stage of higher knowledge begins. I have called the first stage imaginative cognition. It provides only one's own subjective inner life in a tableau of life, as I have described it. And now one must be quite clear that through this first stage of supersensible cognition one has only one's own inner life, the subjective. Then one will not even come to illusions, much less to visions or hallucinations. Those who are spiritual researchers in the anthroposophical sense are absolutely clear about every step of their research path. But then, when this life tableau is suppressed and empty consciousness is created, the second stage of higher, supersensible knowledge begins. I have called it inspired knowledge. One should not think of anything superstitious or traditional here, but, because one needs terminology, only of what I myself describe. And then, when this has happened, when empty consciousness has arisen through the suppression of the life tableau, the image-forming body, then inspiration in the soul brings forth that which the soul was as a purely spiritual-soul being before birth or, better said, in a spiritual-soul world itself. And now comes the great moment of research, when one becomes acquainted with the eternal in human nature through direct observation.

You see, my dear friends, anyone who speaks from an anthroposophical point of view cannot point to abstract concepts to prove immortality through logical conclusions or the like. They must explain step by step how the soul must proceed in intimate inner exercises in order to reach the point where it can behold that which lives as the eternal in our soul, where it can behold this eternal in the soul, at the time when this soul has connected itself through conception with the physical-bodily forces that originate from the parents and ancestors. You may ask how one knows, when something spiritual-soul appears for contemplation through inspiration, that it is the spiritual-soul of the soul before conception.

Well, my dear friends, I can only explain what presents itself to the soul here in immediate experience by means of a comparison. Those who have memories of an earthly experience may now have an image of what they experienced ten years ago. They know from the content of this image that they do not have something in their soul that is directly caused by an event of the present time. They know how the content of the image points them to something that happened ten years ago. Thus, the content of what one now experiences through inspired consciousness is such that it contains something completely different from what is present in the sensory-physical nature, where the soul is in the body. Just as with the memory of earthly experiences, one experiences time along with it. The impression itself indicates that one is dealing with the pre-birth or life before conception, with the experience that the soul went through in a purely spiritual-soul world before it entered the physical-sensory world through the maternal body, which then envelops it in earthly life.

Now, my dear friends, after reaching this stage of inspired knowledge, and thus opening up the question of immortality on one side, opening up a certain solution, namely on the side of unbornness, the other side of the question of immortality can now be considered through other exercises of knowledge. And this can only be done through certain exercises of the will. You will find more details in the two books mentioned above. But I will explain the basic principle to you here.

The human will does not think. It is unlike ordinary thinking. Ordinary thinking is internally stimulated by external impressions. The human will originates from within the organism itself, but in ordinary life we experience this will only in a very special way. Take the simplest decision or impulse of the will. Take, for example, a movement of the arm or hand that is carried out in response to an impulse of the will. What did you actually give to consciousness in this impulse of the will? We don't usually think about this. For orderly research, we need to have a reliable starting point. What we have at first is the thought: we want to raise and move our arm or hand. But how this thought then sinks into the organization, how it excites the muscles, seizes the bones, how what is will unfolds within the organization, the human being knows nothing of this in ordinary consciousness. Only through an external impression, about which he can think, does he see the raised arm, the raised hand. What lies between the first thought that intends the movement of the arm or hand and the last impression, what lies in between, must be said: if one truly practices inner soul knowledge, it eludes consciousness just as the soul experience eludes consciousness from falling asleep to waking up, with the exception of the chaotic dreams that surge up from sleep.

It can be said that only in relation to imagination and thought is the human being actually fully awake; the element of will includes a kind of sleeping life even in the waking state. And as paradoxical as it sounds, it must be said: between the thought that has a volitional impulse as its goal and the action performed, there is a transition that can be compared to falling asleep and waking up. The thought sleeps over into the unknown realm of the will and wakes up again when we observe the action that has been carried out. The further one delves into the mysteries of the development of the will — I can only hint at this — the more one comes to realize that between these two suggested realms, the thought of intention and the thought that reflects the observation of the execution, there really is a kind of sleep in human beings while they are awake. A great change in relation to the will is then brought about through exercises, through certain exercises of the will.

From the large series of exercises of the will given in my books, I would like to highlight a few. For example, one can exercise the will precisely by training it in thinking. In the life of the soul, the individual faculties of thinking, feeling, and willing, which we must distinguish in abstract thinking when we want to describe something of the soul, are not really so separate, but rather one faculty plays into the other. Thus, the will plays into thinking by connecting thoughts and separating them again, and so on. Now, one can exercise the will by arbitrarily thinking backwards about what one is otherwise accustomed to thinking forwards about, based on external facts. For example, one might think a drama from the fifth to the first act backwards, that is, the last events of the fifth act back to the first events of the first act, or feel the last page of a poem or a melody backwards in one's thoughts. Another exercise that is particularly beneficial is to let the experiences of the day pass before your mind's eye in the evening, but starting with the last event in the evening and proceeding towards the morning. You must take the individual things as atomistically as possible. One must go so far as to imagine climbing a staircase as descending, backwards from the top step to the bottom step, and so on. And the more one forms images in this way, in a completely unfamiliar manner that does not correspond to the facts, the more one detaches the will, which is accustomed to passively surrendering to external facts, from external facts and also from physical corporeality.

Once you have done such exercises, you can support yourself with other exercises that I would like to mention: exercises in serious self-observation and self-education. You must eventually be able to judge your own actions and impulses of will from the outside, just as you would objectively judge the actions and impulses of will of another personality. In a sense, one must be able to become one's own objective observer with regard to one's decisions and actions. Yes, one must be able to go even further. When one looks at life, one knows how one has changed over the years. Everyone knows how they have changed over the last ten years in terms of their overall mood and state of mind. But what has been made of us over the years has been done by life, by external reality. One must simply look at these things impartially and see how human beings passively surrender to this external reality. Human beings can now actively practice self-education in order to find their way into the higher worlds. In a sense, they can take their self-education into their own hands by resolving to give up a certain habit. They devote all their energies to giving up a habit or acquiring a new quality. If they succeed in doing this through their own discipline, something that otherwise only life can give them, then they gradually achieve what is the detachment of the will from physical corporeality. And something happens that I can only describe as paradoxical. Because these things are still unfamiliar to today's thinking, they sound paradoxical. But they are definitely reliable results of the anthroposophical path of knowledge, which, as I describe it today, can be taken in order to enter the higher worlds.

Compare, dear audience — as I said, it will sound strange — an eye whose vitreous body is clouded, which is affected by cataracts, which, in a sense, cannot serve us for seeing because of its opacity, compare that with an eye that is completely healthy and transparent. I would like to say that it is precisely because this eye does not make itself felt through its own physicality, but is selflessly integrated into our organism, that it serves us to see for ordinary life, not in an unhealthy way, but in a way that is perfectly healthy for this ordinary life. We should not seek something abstract and unhealthy in ordinary life through which we can reach the higher worlds. For ordinary life, our entire physical organism is, in a sense, such a large opaque eye. And through such exercises of will, our entire organism is made transparent. The will is spiritualized.

We penetrate into what lies between the two thoughts, the thought that sets the goal of an action and the thought of the last observed action. We penetrate into a spiritual world by making our organism completely transparent for the soul, so to speak. That is it. Just as the eye is not there for itself in the organism, so the whole physical organism will not be there if these exercises of will are continued; it will become transparent, so to speak. And just as the physical organism is that which, in its instincts, its drives, its emotions, its entire organic processes, catches our impulses of will and makes them opaque, plunging them, as it were, into a state of sleep, so now everything becomes transparent, just as through the transparent glass body of the eye everything that is material in the eye becomes transparent.

And by shaping our entire physical organism, as it were, into a transparent sense organ, we have now developed to a higher level a soul force which, as I know, many people do not readily accept as a cognitive faculty. It should not be regarded as a power of cognition as it is in ordinary life, but it is developed to a higher level, and there it becomes a power of cognition. I mean the power of love. The power of love is what makes us, as human beings, valuable above all else as social beings in ordinary life. Love is the best, the most beautiful power in everyday life, both individually and as social love. When it is heightened in the way it can be through the will exercises mentioned, when these will exercises make our organism transparent in the manner described, then love is developed to a higher level. We develop the power to pass over into the objective spiritual, and the third stage of knowledge enters, that of true intuition, which I have called intuitive knowledge. The word intuition is also used in ordinary life — I will come back to this — but not as in ordinary life; rather, I use the word intuitive knowledge in this developed form, as I have explained. This is a kind of knowledge in which the human being stands within the spiritual realm, having made their body transparent, so to speak, and transformed it into a sensory organ.

And through this knowledge, my dear friends, something else now enters the consciousness of the soul: we now recognize how human beings can live in their liberated will, independent of their physicality. Human beings live, as it were, with the thoughts they have first strengthened and connected with their will; they live outside the body. But this gives the cognitive image of the process of death. What really happens in death, that the spiritual-soul detaches itself from the physical body and continues its own existence in the spiritual-soul world after the human being has passed through the gate of death, is seen in the image, in the image of knowledge, through intuitive knowledge, in that we have first made our whole organism into a sense organ through the cultivation of the will. Thus, immortality consists of unbornness and actual immortality, of the fact that the soul cannot perish in physical death. The eternity of the human soul is composed of unbornness and immortality. It can be seen through genuine anthroposophical research. This should first point out how human beings learn to recognize their own eternity, their immortality, through contemplation.

But as human beings learn to recognize their own soul-spiritual nature, they also learn to recognize their spiritual-soul environment. Through inspired and intuitive knowledge, they come to know the spiritual-soul world in which the human soul lives before conception and after death as a world of real spiritual beings. Just as the sensory world lies spread out before us as a world full of sensory beings that we perceive with our senses, so too does a spiritual-soul world lie spread out before the soul that experiences itself in its spiritual-soul existence, a world from which we emerged at conception and through birth, and into which we re-enter at death. And just as our own physicality falls away from us, so too does that which connected us to other people in the sensual-physical realm, and we find ourselves reunited with other people, our spiritual-soul being. Through this, immortality, the stay in the spiritual world, becomes a real result of knowledge.

But even the spiritual-soul world that constantly surrounds us, which cannot be explored by thinking left to its own devices through the laws of natural science, this spiritual -spiritual world, which is hidden in spiritual nature, like the colors and sounds that are hidden in the sensory world, this world also appears to the perception that can be developed in the manner indicated. And there — I would like to say — the whole of nature automatically becomes something other than what it already is for sensory perception. Not as if outer nature were to disappear in terms of its material properties and substances. It remains fully present before supersensible knowledge, just as the healthy human being remains present with his or her common sense alongside the personality that is developed with the higher powers of knowledge. But alongside outer nature, a supersensible, spiritual nature develops, so to speak — allow me to use the contradiction. I want to give a single example of this spiritual vision within nature. For ordinary perception and science, the sun stands in space with its contours. We construct the shape of this sun, insofar as it is present in physical space and acts in physical space, through astronomy and astrophysics. For research that makes use of the higher abilities I have described, the sun becomes something quite different. We learn to recognize that what is present in space as the physical body of the sun is only the body for a spiritual being, but this spiritual being fills all the space accessible to us. The sun-like fills the space accessible to us, flowing as a force through minerals, plants, animals, and our human organization. It is, as it were, consolidated or concentrated in this outer spatial-physical aspect of the sun's body, but the sun-like is present everywhere.

And as we get to know outer nature by reproducing it in abstract thoughts, by allowing outer nature to live on in images, the spiritual basis of nature lives on more deeply in our spiritual human nature. Let us pursue our abstract thoughts within ourselves. They are images of external sensory nature. Let us pursue that which is spiritual in the external world, let us see the solar nature within ourselves, then we will first learn about our own organization. Then we find this sun-like quality in our own human nature, in all the forces that have a particularly strong effect while we are growing, the forces that permeate us in our youth, the forces that emanate primarily from our brain, which have a formative effect on our physical organism, especially during early childhood. We get to know the sun-like nature in our own organism, and we get to know each individual organ, heart, lungs, brain, and so on, insofar as they contain a special configuration of the sun's forces. And we get to know each individual organ in relation to its constructive forces by getting to know its connection with the sun-like nature. And I do not shy away from describing, at least in principle, things that still seem paradoxical, perhaps fantastic, to people today, but which are reliable results of anthroposophical research.

Just as we get to know the sun-like, we also get to know the moon-like. We get to know the physical moon with its physical contours. But the lunar aspect in turn fills the entire space accessible to us, intervenes in all realms of nature, intervenes in the plant, mineral, and animal worlds, and also intervenes in our physical organization. We learn to recognize in the whole human being the inner workings of the lunar forces, the destructive forces, those forces that are particularly active when we are in a descending, aging development. But these destructive forces are always active in the process of nutrition, just like the solar forces, in youth and in old age; we learn to recognize the influx of the whole cosmos into the human being. Through this, however, we learn about all the processes that are present in the human being. We learn about the connection between the cosmos and the human being. And just as I was able to describe the principles of the sun and the moon, so too can other aspects of the cosmos be described. In this way, we learn about a more intimate relationship between the human being and the spirit of nature in the cosmos than is known in ordinary science and ordinary life.

But with that, my dear friends, I have reached the point where I can discuss how anthroposophy, despite having developed as a supersensible science in the manner described, can meet life and the individual sciences, indeed practical life in general, in all areas of existence. First of all, I must point out how human beings become transparent in a completely different sense of knowledge when we see through them in their relationship to the cosmos. Even the physical human being becomes a sum of processes. What otherwise appears to us as a closed heart, a closed lung, a closed brain, is transformed in a way that we could not have imagined before, into processes, into something that is becoming. We learn to recognize how the forces of building and breaking down are contained in every organ in a different way. A spiritual physiology, a spiritual biology can be constructed.

But above all, these insights prove fruitful in the field of medicine, for pathology, therapy, and healing in general. Those who understand the human organism in this way also learn about the abnormal building forces, that is, the forces of proliferation, the processes of proliferation in the human organism. And they also learn about the abnormal destructive forces, the inflammatory processes, and so on in their context. And one learns to recognize, for example, for an abnormal build-up, that is, for a proliferative process, the opposite process, also through the interaction of the solar and lunar forces. One learns to recognize the corresponding remedy in a plant or a mineral. One learns to recognize how a growth process in the human organism corresponds to a destructive process in a plant, in a mineral, and so on. In short, from merely trying out remedies, one comes to a clear understanding of how everything that is spread out in nature continues to work in the human organism through the processes of growth and decay, through the other cosmic processes that work in all beings.

When one presents this in detail, it is equally inspiring that it has actually become possible for a whole number of doctors to feel inspired to really take up such rational medicine as can be inspired by anthroposophical spiritual research. In Dornach, near Basel, and also in Stuttgart, there is already a medical-therapeutic institute, run by specialist doctors who, however, take up in a fruitful way in the medical fields what can be added through anthroposophical research from spiritual sources to what external natural science is able to explore about the human body and remedies. This must be said above all: neither in this field nor in any other field does anthroposophy in any way strive for unjustified opposition to the truly justified scientific approach of the present day. On the contrary, anthroposophy, when properly understood, must be based precisely on scientific principles, on truly rigorous scientific principles. It is not a question of combating what is recognized as medicine, but solely of further developing it. And the fact that it can be further developed is recognized, as I said, by a relatively large circle of doctors. And even if this circle is only relatively large, it will expand, because the widest circles of people will be interested in recognizing how new healing powers and new healing methods can be found through the spirit. This is an area where anthroposophy can have a fruitful effect on life. Another area is the artistic. My dear friends, anthroposophy has been around for decades. At a certain point in time, a number of friends of the anthroposophical worldview felt the need to build a home for anthroposophy. Due to circumstances that I cannot go into further, this home was built — it is not yet completely finished — near Basel. How would this home have been built if it had been built out of a different spiritual movement? Well, if such a thing had been necessary in another spiritual movement, they would have turned to an architect who would have created a building in the antique, Renaissance, Rococo, Romanesque, or Gothic style, or in a mixture of these styles, which would have become an outer framework for what is to be achieved through anthroposophy. Anthroposophy cannot appear in this way. Anthroposophy does not want just any theory, not just anything that has to do with the intellect, with the human head, and can be framed in every way by some kind of building. Anthroposophy wants to have an effect on the whole human being, just as it comes out of the whole human being. It makes the whole human being, as it were, into a sense organ, as described. Thus, everything that comes into being in the world through it comes from the whole, from the complete human being. And how the artistic, which is to be shaped for it, must be shaped, I want to make clear by means of a comparison. If you have a nutshell, it is grooved and rounded in a certain way. The laws according to which it is furrowed and rounded are the same as those according to which the nut kernel is formed. One cannot imagine that the shell is formed according to different laws than the kernel of the nut. So it is when anthroposophy is to build, paint, sculpt, in order to create a framework for itself. In a sense, everything artistic must flow from the same laws from which the ideas flow that are proclaimed from the podium from the vision of the spiritual world. Therefore, no ordinary, existing architectural style was taken, but a new architectural style was created. It may be as imperfect as possible, and those who criticize it may be right. It is a first attempt, a first beginning. But what had to be strived for can be characterized by saying that in Dornach, every wall design, every column, every sculpture, every painting had to reveal the same thing that is said when, in ideas proclaimed from the podium in the Dornach building, that which is proclaimed as anthroposophy, which can be explored in higher worlds through direct observation. The spoken word is only another form of what is intended to have an artistic effect as a frame. Everything has really flowed into artistic forms. And in doing so, there is not just one symbol, one allegory, as some believe, present in Dornach.

And one can see, even though everything is imperfect, as is necessary in the beginning, one can say: Goethe's conception of art, Goethe's perception of art, can be seen today in such a desire, even if this desire is still far from being realized. For what does Goethe say precisely when he wanted to express his perception of art, his view of art, in the most intimate and profound way? He said: Art is a manifestation of secret laws of nature that would never be revealed without it. Goethe made another significant statement: Those to whom nature begins to reveal its most intimate secrets feel a deep longing for its most worthy interpreter, art. But this longing is felt most strongly when the spirit that works in nature is revealed in one's soul through supersensible vision. One does not receive symbolic abstract allegories, but real spiritual creations that also have a sense of materiality and can be incorporated into the individual materials as truly artistic works. Thus, anthroposophy has a fertilizing effect on the artistic field in all its forms.

And a [third] place where anthroposophy provides fruitful and transformative impulses for life is the Free Waldorf School in Stuttgart, which was founded by Emil Molt and is directed by me. This Waldorf school aims to be a school where anthroposophy is not grafted onto the soul of the child as a worldview. That is completely foreign to us at the Waldorf School. The Waldorf School is concerned with translating precisely what anthroposophy can offer into immediate skill, into pedagogical and didactic skill. In Waldorf schools, it is not a matter of instilling anthroposophical ideas in children at school, which we prove by having Protestant religious instruction taught by Protestant pastors and Catholic religious instruction by Catholic pastors, and that we have only created our own free religious instruction for dissident children, which, however, is not intended to be anthroposophy translated into religion.

Simply by providing, in the way I have described, a real understanding of the whole human being, the complete human being in body, soul, and spirit, by providing a real understanding of the human being, initially for the child, it provides the spiritual basis for truly implementing the great pedagogical and didactic maxims of the great educators of the nineteenth century. Here, too, anthroposophical research does not seek to contradict or oppose what is already good, but rather to provide a true understanding of human beings for use in educational and didactic practice. And when we fully understand the whole human being in body, soul, and spirit, it becomes possible to read the curriculum and teaching objectives from the child's own nature for each year of life, indeed for each month of the child's life. It is possible to draw everything out of the human being themselves through a true, real knowledge of the human being. Anthroposophy wants to have a practical effect in education and teaching. It does not want to establish abstract, new principles — there are enough of those already — but rather to influence educational practice itself. And that this is possible, that real curricula and teaching goals are not established through abstract principles or majority decisions, but that they can be read from the nature of the developing human being itself for each month, for each year, can already be seen after practicing this anthroposophical approach in Waldorf schools for some time. So it is only in educational and didactic practice, not in the worldview of the children, that what is intended by the Waldorf school is to be incorporated.

And finally, to mention a few other areas, I would like to point out that anthroposophy, by referring to the whole human being with its insights, can also have a fruitful effect on social life. We have seen how the one-sided application of the scientific way of thinking has its limits and cannot approach the true nature of the human being, how this view, when it flows into social impulses, must have a destructive effect. I do not believe that there is yet enough impartial judgment in the wider circles to recognize how destructive it is for the whole of human culture in Eastern Europe that what has become practical reality and at the same time realized illusions for social life as social impulses has arisen precisely from this view of the purely natural. And what began destructively in Eastern Europe now hangs over the whole of present-day civilization like a great threat.

If social impulses are also deepened by not looking outwardly at the instinctive, the merely natural in human beings, and, in a sense, understanding human freedom only as higher instincts, will it be possible to recognize the true freedom of human beings in the spirit, as I have attempted to describe it on the basis of such anthroposophical principles in my “Philosophy of Freedom,” published at the beginning of the 1890s? then a sum of social impulses will also arise that can place the whole human being alongside the whole human being and have a corrective, spiritualizing effect on what today hovers over human civilization in such a destructive way, like a threatening specter of the future.

How healthy thinking can arise from education and social life has been demonstrated — I would like to cite just two examples from among many. Last summer, when we held the first anthroposophical congress in Stuttgart. Dr. Caroline von Heydebrand, a teacher at the Waldorf School, explained how external experimental pedagogy, which should by no means be opposed in its justification, but which nevertheless offers only something external, can be complemented in the right way by what arises as an intimate relationship between human beings, including between the teacher and the student. This excellent lecture is available in print as a brochure, as is a lecture by Emil Leinhas on another subject. This lecture deals with what is imperfect in today's national economy from an anthroposophical point of view, imperfect above all in that it remains fruitless for real social life. Anthroposophical economics will be something practical; it will be able to provide practical social motives. In this respect, Emil Leinhas' brochure, The Bankruptcy of National Economics, is also a favorable sign for the future.

Now, ladies and gentlemen, these are just a few examples that show how anthroposophy can have a fruitful effect on life. If one considers ethical, moral, and ethical life in the unbiased way that I have tried to do, and to establish it on a secure foundation in the book Philosophy of Freedom, one finds the concept of intuition. In this Philosophy of Freedom, I was able to show how that which lives in the moral conscience is simply taken in from spiritual worlds through an unconscious intuition of pure thinking, through an unconscious moral intuition. The true moral impulses that arise from the conscience are moral intuitions from the spiritual world, which are then found in their truth through the inspirational and intuitive insights that I have described today from an anthroposophical point of view.

Anthroposophy, with its insights, thus also addresses the most intimate, the most important moments of feeling and emotion in the human soul, especially religious piety. It would be slanderous to portray anthroposophy as if it wanted to found some kind of sect or establish a new religion. Based on the foundations of knowledge that I have described today, anthroposophy cannot and does not want to be sectarian. Nor can it found a new religion. But what people have in terms of religions and religious needs can only be accommodated in a favorable sense if knowledge of the supersensible is also made accessible. And one should believe that it is precisely the representatives of religious denominations who should feel a deep satisfaction when, in our time, a spiritual movement arises which, from the point of view of knowledge, establishes what faith seeks. And it is actually incomprehensible that the official representatives of religious denominations do not see anchoring of religious life in anthroposophy, but often something hostile. If they really recognized the fundamentals of anthroposophy, rather than just glancing at it superficially, they would be able to see in it the strongest support for true piety, for true religious life. For when a light of knowledge comes to the seeking soul from supersensible worlds, not merely from the sensory world, faith does not receive an unfavorable influence, but rather a strong support, just as in morality the soul receives strong sources of goodness, just as it receives moral action, a way of life, security in life, and purpose in life by learning to know itself as a member of a spiritual world, just as the outer body is a member of a physical world. In this knowledge as a member of a spiritual world, human beings will in turn be able to discover their true human value, a true human ethics, and human morality.

And so, I may summarize in a few sentences what I wanted to present as the essence of anthroposophy, summarizing in a picture what I have said in this reflection, which, although it is already long enough, is still insufficient and can only be regarded as an introduction to what I wanted to say about the essence of anthroposophy.

We have the human being before us. We have shaped him before us according to his physical body. We only recognize him in his entire being when we see how his physiognomy is the expression of his soul, when his movements become for us the expression and revelation of the physical-natural of his physicality, and when we see the soul-spiritual shining through his physical-bodily nature. In natural science — which is fully recognized in its justified striving by anthroposophy, with which it is not in conflict, but which it only seeks to further develop — we have, in a sense, the knowledge of the outer world body. We ourselves have a kind of physicality in our physical-sensory knowledge of nature and in our intellectual interpretation. Just as we only have the whole, complete human being before us when his soul and spirit are revealed through his physical body, so we only have the knowledge of nature before us in its entirety when it expresses, through all that it offers us in facts, experiments, revelations, and natural laws — in a sense as in a wonderful physiognomy — expresses a spiritual-soul aspect of world knowledge. And so anthroposophy would like to be this: just as the human being only expresses himself completely and fully when his spiritual and soul aspects speak through his physical aspects, so anthroposophy would like to be the soul, the spirit of real, whole, complete knowledge of the human being and the world for every body of knowledge given in the external natural sciences.