The Younger Generation
GA 217
10 October 1922, Dornach
Lecture VIII
Up to now we have given an outer description of what was experienced by those growing-up about the turn of the nineteenth century, by considering the trend of man's spiritual culture. Today, in order to find the bridge to a true self-knowledge, we will study the human being more from within. When we consider the externals of spiritual evolution, especially in the West, we are led back to the first third of the fifteenth century; in an inward study we find ourselves led back to the fourth post-Christian century. A date indicating some important moment would be the year 333 A.D., yet this date is of course only approximate. It is not a date from which to make calculations, but as pointing approximately to weighty matters affecting a large proportion of European humanity.
Let us look into the soul of a man who before this date lived into the culture of Southern Europe, or in certain districts of Northern Africa. These districts come into prominence when we try to gain an idea of what gave the tone to the cultural life of the time. The souls of these human beings were still so constituted that they were conscious that human thought was not simply a head process, but that it was revealed, either directly to the individual, or, where the human being was not able to receive such revelation directly, through the confidential communication of other human beings. The prevalent feeling among the educated today—and among the uneducated—is that their thoughts are worked out in their own heads—this feeling did not then exist. It was a period of actual transition. In the Middle East outstanding spiritual personalities were concerned with how thoughts came to humanity from spiritual realms. In Southern Europe and in Northern Africa doubts crept in as to whether the human being possessed the faculty of receiving thoughts by revelation. These doubts were only faint at first, there was still an overwhelming feeling: When I have a thought, this thought has been put into me by a God either indirectly or transmitted by way of human heredity, that is, through tradition, not natural heredity. Thought can enter earthly evolution only as revelation.
The first Westerners to feel strong doubts in this direction were those who had come from the Northern peoples and entered the civilization of the South. They were of Germanic and Celtic blood and had moved with the various migrations from the North to the South. These people, had they grown up only out of their own forces, might have reached the point of saying: Thoughts are something we work out for ourselves. This feeling, however, was dulled down by what they found as the Graeco-Latin culture, as the culture of the East. These cultures were extraordinarily intermixed up to the fourth century; every possible trend was working within them. Yet in the migrations southwards it was realized that thoughts can be grasped only by drawing them down into the world of the senses from a super-sensible world.
We have, my dear friends, only an external history, we have no history of feeling, no history of thought, no history of the soul. Hence such things do not come to our notice; we do not notice how the whole disposition of soul changes from one century to another. There was a tremendous swing round in man's inner perception in the fourth century. We find then something that for the very first time caused man to reflect upon the origin of thought; so that what previously had been accepted without question, namely, the fact that thoughts were revealed, gradually came to a point where a theory was needed to prove that they were the result of revelation. But these people were by no means convinced that the human being could create his thought-world out of himself.
Now consider the great difference here between the souls of the present day and the souls of that time. I am speaking of some souls only. What I am describing to you was naturally present in various shades. For one part of humanity matters were as I have described them; for another, there was still an invincibly strong, intense belief that soul-spiritual Beings descending into the human organism communicated thoughts to man. It was, if I may put it, only the “elite” among humanity who at that time grasped thought in such a way that they had to ask: Where do thoughts come from? The others knew very little about thoughts; for them it was quite evident that thoughts were given.
Now take the souls born approximately after the year 333. These souls were no longer able, out of a natural feeling, to give a matter-of-course explanation of the origin of thought. Thus a period followed in which theorists, philosophers and philosophical theologians argued as to the significance of thoughts in the world and there arose the struggle between Nominalism and Realism. The Nominalists were those in the Middle Ages who said: Thoughts live only in the human individuality; they are only a summing-up of what exists outside in the world and within the separate individuals. The Realists still had a vivid recollection of ancient times when men regarded thoughts as having substance, as something substantial that was revealed. They conceived thoughts so that they said: It is not I who think the thought; it is not I who, for instance, sum up all dogs into the general concept dog; but there exists one general thought “dog” and this is revealed out of the spiritual world, just as a color or tone is revealed to the senses. It was a struggle to understand rightly the nature of thought which had, as it were, alighted as an independent possession into the human soul. It is of extraordinary interest to steep oneself, from this point of view, in the spiritual history of the Middle Ages.
As we approach the fifteenth century, we discover with what intensity human beings strove to come to terms with what is revealed through thought in man. Whereas mankind before the year 333 really had the idea: There is a divine weaving streaming around the earth just as in the physical world the atmosphere streams round it; and in this streaming, Beings reveal themselves to man and leave behind in him thoughts. They are, so to speak, the footprints of the divine world surrounding the earth, which are graven into men as thoughts. Whereas those souls who before the year 333 considered that in the thought-world a feeling of their connection with the spiritual world existed, we find the Middle Ages permeated by the tragedy of still seeking to connect thought in some way with the divine-spiritual.
Now why did those souls who, up to the fifteenth century thought about thoughts, if I may put it so—why was it that they strove so vigorously to connect thoughts with what is divine-spiritual in the cosmos? It was because they felt an inner impulse which they were unable to express in clear concepts, but which was present in them as a definite experience of soul. This originated from all the souls who were born to play a leading part, from the fourth to the fourteenth century, being reincarnations from the time before the year 333 from the souls who had argued vehemently as to the real or merely nominal character of concepts, having lived previously at the time of the Mystery of Golgotha.
The Mystery of Golgotha took place in comparative isolation in Western Asia. But that was only the external manifestation of a spiritual event which took place in the physical world. Something happened in the souls who had reached a certain degree of maturity. When we consider those actually fighting over the reality or unreality of thoughts we find personalities in whom were reincarnated souls whose previous incarnation had taken place during the first three Christian centuries. Essentially, however, civilized mankind was made up of souls reincarnated from the time before the Mystery of Golgotha. Out of the real connection between the human soul and the divine spiritual world which expressed itself in the acceptance of thought being received through revelation—out of this experience which souls living in the Middle Ages had in an earlier earth-life many centuries before, arose the impulse to dispute about the reality or unreality of the thought-world.
For what is it that is known as Scholasticism at the beginning of the new era in the thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth centuries? What actually filled the souls of the Scholastics? It is the following—the decisive moment had arrived in the evolution of man; it was not given utterance but was felt by outstanding souls of that time. The Gods had forsaken the sphere of human thought, as if man only had thoughts that were wrung dry.
When we observe the souls who lived from the fifteenth century on into later times, we find them to be those who in their previous incarnation had lived not long after the year 333. Up to the eighth, [or] ninth post-Christian centuries, at least those who were teachers still had the feeling that human thought was a gift of the Gods. And the men who in their previous earth-life had already felt the world of thought to be forsaken by the Gods were those—naturally I am speaking only of a part of humanity—destined to be born again about the turn of the nineteenth century.
When, therefore, we observe not only external destiny, but the inner destiny of the human soul, we must pay no heed to that which wells up out of our childhood from the depths of the soul. We must look to the time in which souls were incarnated who could no longer hear from their teachers that thoughts were Beings permeated, imbued by the divine. There-by the inner feeling arose to flee from thought, that something warmer, more saturated with substance should be found. This arose because already in a previous incarnation the divine character of thought had become subject to the gravest doubts, or had indeed been entirely lost. It was at the turn of the nineteenth century that what shines through with the greatest intensity out of the previous earth-life was experienced as tragedy.
Since the first third of the fifteenth century the receiving of thought from the divine-spiritual world was already lost to man. Because he could no longer receive thoughts out of the divine-spiritual world, they were grasped out of external observation. External observation and the art of making experiments reached such a height just because the taking in of things inwardly was replaced by gleaning them from the external sense world.
In the development of world-history, however, what is solely dependent on external conditions does not immediately become apparent. For even if since the fifteenth century man has lost the faculty of perceiving thought from within as a revelation from the divine-spiritual world, souls were not yet there able to feel the full tragedy of being forsaken by revealed thought. In those who had lived their former life on earth before the sixth or seventh century, particularly before the fourth post-Christian century, there lived the feeling: Yes, we must admit that we receive our thoughts from the external world, but in spite of this our soul tells us that even the thoughts received from the external world are given us by God. We no longer know how thoughts are God-given, but our inner being tells us that this is so.
A truly brilliant spirit who had such a mood of soul was Johannes Kepler. Johannes Kepler was as much a natural scientist of an earlier time as of a later one. He drew his thoughts from external observation, but in his inner experience he had an absolute feeling that spiritual Beings are there when man is receiving his thoughts from Nature. Kepler felt himself to be partly an Initiate, and for him it was a matter of course that he experienced his abstract building up of the universe artistically.
It is extraordinarily valuable, from a scientific point of view, to immerse oneself in the progress human thought has made through such a man as Kepler. But one is more deeply stirred when one steeps oneself in Kepler's life of soul, in that soul-life which in later times did not work with such intensity and inwardness in any other natural scientist, certainly not in any authoritative teacher of mankind at large. For between the fifteenth and the nineteenth centuries the feeling was entirely lost that through thought the human soul is brought into connection with the divine-spiritual.
Those who do not merely study the course of time in an unimaginative fashion just taking in the content, but are able to experience something in the course of events, have remarkable things revealed to them. I do not wish here to talk of how Goethe's special way of thinking about Nature has become an impossibility for later science. I mean for the external science of the times following his; for science did not realize where the difference lay between external science and that of Goethe. But I do not want to speak about this. You need only look at certain scientific books of the first third of the nineteenth century, those that gave the tone to the later mode of thought; you need only look, for instance, into the physiological works either of Henle or Burdach which absolutely belong to the first third of the nineteenth century, although they may have been written later, and you will note in them all a different style. There is still something of the spirit which wells up directly out of the soul when, let us say, they speak of the embryo or of the structure of the human brain; there is still something of what has since been entirely lost.
In this connection it is significant to bring to mind a personality still actively working during the last third of the nineteenth century. He was already subject to the forces driving out the spirit from science, nevertheless he still retained the spiritual life in his own soul. Just let the anatomy of Hyrtl work upon you; he hardly belonged to the last third, chiefly to the second third of the nineteenth century. These books are written in the style of later anatomists, but one can see that it was difficult for Hyrtl. He writes chapter after chapter, always restraining the impulse to allow his soul to flow into his sentences. Occasionally it peeps up through the style, occasionally even through the content. But there is, one might say, the iron necessity to stop the soul and spirit welling up from the man's inner being whenever natural processes are described. Today we can barely imagine what can be experienced when, let us say, we go back from a contemporary anatomical book to Hyrtl or Burdach. One feels as if charged with a certain amount of warmth in one's scientific feeling on going back to the second third, but particularly to the first third of the nineteenth century. Certainly at that time science was not at its zenith. But that is only of secondary importance and need not be considered further. I am speaking of what was experienced in science. And about that one can say: Through studying the path taken by the scientific soul, we can verify what Spiritual Science reveals to us, namely, that at the end of the nineteenth century more and more souls arose in whom there no longer lived from their previous earth-life the impulse that thought is God-given—I mean that there was no longer even an echo of this. For although the sense for the individual past earth-life had been lost, its echo still lived on long afterwards.
Thus felt those who still had a living warmth within them, who had not become dried up by the prejudice that in science one must be objective—in its usual sense; actually what is striven for by Spiritual Science is the truly objective science, but not in the scientists' meaning of the word. These souls not dried up through striving after objectivity asked: What is there in us still bound up with the divine-spiritual (they did not ask this consciously but subconsciously) from which we were torn in our previous earthly incarnation? Rising to the surface of consciousness was the feeling that man had lost his connection with the divine-spiritual world. On the other hand, it is a feeling that man dare not lose this connection, for without even this faint consciousness there is no life for his soul. Hence an intense yearning aroused, the strong inclination to that undefined longing for the Spirit, and yet the incapacity to reach it.
It is characteristic of the generation growing up about the turn of the nineteenth century and at the beginning of the twentieth that it should ask the older generations: Can we discover the Spiritual in our earthly environment? And the leaders who were asked unconsciously by youth: How can we find the Spiritual in Nature, how can we find it within human life itself?—these leaders condemned as unscientific this bringing the Spirit into the study of Nature and of human life.
Thus in the second half of the nineteenth century a dreadful thing happened—the slogan “Psychology, science of the soul without a soul” arose. I lay no special stress on how certain philosophers said that we need a soul-science without soul. What the philosophers say has no great influence, but it is symptomatic of what figures very widely as feeling and of how one deals with the younger generation. True, only a few philosophers actually said: We need a psychology without soul. But the whole age said: We older people wish to teach you mineralogy, zoology, botany, biology, anthropology, even history, in a way to make it appear to you as if at the most there are experiences of the soul, but not a soul as such. And the whole world, in so far as it is observed scientifically, must be experienced as having no soul. Those who were first to bring with them out of their previous earth-life the tragedy of experiencing soullessness were compelled to ask with the utmost insistence: Where can we look to fill the soul with Spirit? And from what their age considered of greatest value—in other respects rightly so—they gleaned the least information.
Those who in the last third of the nineteenth century wrote that one can gather the nature of their soul-life from their books were, even in the nineteenth century, a vanishing minority. In general the people who wrote these books were not the most brilliant. Among those who do not write books there are distinctly cleverer people than among those who do write them. In the last third of the nineteenth century profounder natures were living in the midst of the superficial ones content with a science bereft of Spirit. And when one looks into these profounder natures, which is possible through Spiritual Science, one finds in the last third of the nineteenth century a wrestling with deep problems. Those who had this inner life were no longer listened to; they no longer found the opportunity to become leaders.
Many people foresaw clearly what the microscope was bringing in its wake in the second half of the nineteenth century. They were to be found among those who, participating in the cultural life, did not really penetrate into it because they felt dissatisfied with a culture devoid of Spirit, and therefore had their thoughts inwardly silenced in face of the growing scientific conceptions, yet asking with deep feeling: How can microcosmic evolution be brought into relation with macrocosmic evolution? This problem became increasingly pressing in their feeling life.
There were also men who, as a result of their education, followed the scientific tradition that continued to become ever emptier and emptier of spirit. They hoped, for instance, for always greater scientific results from the further development of the microscope; they hoped with its help to see smaller and smaller objects. But others of a deeper nature looked with disturbed feelings upon the further development of the microscope, particularly upon the views which followed in its train. The highest hope of one group was, by examining ever smaller and smaller objects, to penetrate into the nature of what is living. But others felt that this whole business would bring the world to naught, that the use of the microscope sucked the soul dry.
I trust you will not think that I am indulging in satire in a mystic, fantastical fashion on the use of the microscope. That would never occur to me. I am naturally fully aware of the services rendered by the microscope, and I would never wish to put a spoke in any scientific wheel. I am simply recounting facts relating to the life of soul.
The number of these solitary spirits steadily decreased. Fortlage, who lived as Professor in Jena at the end of the nineteenth century, was one of them. He spoke somewhat as follows: One can look more and more thoroughly into the microscope and go on discovering ever smaller things, but in this minuteness one loses what is substantially true. If you want to see what is being sought with the aid of the microscope—which, with ever greater perfection, allows one to penetrate further and further into the minute—then turn your gaze out into the infinite space of the universe. From the stars there speaks what you are seeking within the minute. You talk of the secrets of life, and seek for them from what is minute, and ever more minute. But there one loses life, not for reality, but for knowledge. Life is lost in this way. You can find it again when you understand how to read the stars.
Some have said: Life is brought down from the cosmos. But they sought for a material means, possibly in the meteor-showers flying through cosmic space and bringing germs out of other worlds down to the earth. But when one gazes from the earth out into limitless space, it is not limitless at all. For the mechanistic-mathematical way of perception, the firmament was done away with by Giordano Bruno: but for more intimate perception it is again there in the sense that one cannot simply draw a radius from the earth and prolong it into infinity. This radius has in fact an end, and at this end there is everywhere, at the inner periphery, life to be found and not death. From this world-periphery life radiates in from all directions.
I only wish to indicate to you by these examples the nature of those inner problems of experience which confronted the soul at the turn of the nineteenth century. Out of the dullest experience of soul the question really was put: Where can we rediscover the Spiritual?
You see, this question must set the mood if any phase of the youth movement is to find a right content—Where can I find the Spiritual? How does one experience the Spiritual? The really important thing is that side by side with all yearning expectation there shall also be found among the young, single ideals striving towards an inner activity of the soul. I should like to preface what I have to say tomorrow by the following.
In what I have named Anthroposophy, in fact in the foreword to my Philosophy of Spiritual Activity, you will meet with something which you will not be able to comprehend if you only give yourself up to that passive thinking so specially loved today, to that popular god-forsaken thinking of even a previous incarnation. You will only understand if you develop in Freedom the inner impulse to bring activity into your thinking. You will never get on with Spiritual Science if that spark, that lightning, through which activity in thinking is awakened does not flash up. Through this activity we must reconquer the divine nature of thinking.
Anthroposophical literature demands that one shall think actively. Most people are only able to think passively, finding active thinking impossible. But active thinking has no room for sleepy nor for intellectual dreaming. One must keep in step with it and get one's thinking on the move. The moment thinking is set in motion one goes with it. Then what I should like to call modern clairvoyance ceases to be anything miraculous. That this clairvoyance should still appear as something particularly miraculous comes from people not wishing to develop the energy to bring activity into their thinking. It often drives one to despair. One often feels when demanding active thinking of anyone that his mood is illustrated by the following anecdote: Somebody was lying in a ditch without moving hand or foot, not even opening his eyes; he was asked by a passer-by: “Why are you so sad?” The man answered: “Because I don't want to do anything.” The questioner was astonished at this, for the man lying there was doing nothing and had apparently done nothing for a long time. But he wanted to do even more “doing nothings” Then the questioner said: “Well, you certainly are doing nothing,” and got the answer: “I have to revolve with the earth and even that I don't want to do “
This is how people appear who do not wish to bring activity into thinking, into what alone out of man's being can bring the soul back into connection with the divine-spiritual content of the world. Many of you have learnt to despise thinking, because it has met you only in its passive form. This, however, is only head-thinking in which the heart plays no part. But try for once really to think actively and you will see how the heart is then engaged; if one succeeds in developing active thinking the whole human being in a way suited to our present age enters with the greatest intensity into the spiritual world. For through active thinking we are able to bring force into our thinking—the force of a stout heart. If you do not seek the Spirit on the path of thought, which although difficult to tread must be trodden with courage, with the very blood of one's heart, if you do not try on this path to suck in that spiritual life which has flowed through humanity from the very beginning, you will create a movement where the infant would believe himself able to draw nourishment out of himself and not from his mother's breast. You only come to a movement with real content when you find the secret of developing within an activity which enables you to draw again out of cosmic life true spiritual nourishment, true spiritual drink.
But that is pre-eminently a problem of the will, a problem of the will experienced through feeling. Infinitely much depends today upon good-will, upon an energetic willing, and no theories can solve what we are seeking today. Courageous, strong will alone can bring the solution.
Let us devote the next few days to the question of how to find this good-will, this strong will.
Achter Vortrag
[ 1 ] Wir haben bisher versucht, von außen zu charakterisieren, was der heranwachsende Mensch um die Wende des neunzehnten, zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts erleben konnte, indem wir den Seelenblick auf die besondere Art, welche die menschliche Geisteskultur angenommen hat, gerichtet haben. Heute wollen wir einmal, um einen Übergang zu einer echten Selbsterkenntnis zu finden, die Menschenwesenheit von innen betrachten.
[ 2 ] So, wie man für eine mehr äußerliche Betrachtung der Geistesentwickelung des Abendlandes auf das erste Drittel des fünfzehnten Jahrhunderts zurückgewiesen wird, so muß man für eine mehr innerliche Betrachtung in das vierte nachchristliche Jahrhundert zurückgehen. Wenn Sie ein Jahr haben wollen, das gewissermaßen einen markanten Punkt andeutet, dann ist es das Jahr 333 unserer Zeitrechnung. Dieses Jahr ist natürlich nur approximativ zu nehmen; es ist nicht rechnungsmäßig gemeint, sondern so, daß es wie ein Näherungspunkt auf wichtige Dinge hinweist, die mit einem recht großen Teile der europäischen Menschheit geschehen sind.
[ 3 ] Versuchen wir einmal, in eine Menschenseele hineinzuschauen, die sich vor diesem Zeitpunkt in jene Kultur hineingelebt hatte, die dazumal im Süden von Europa, vielleicht auch in einzelnen Gegenden des Nordens von Afrika zu finden war. Diese Gegenden kommen ja vorzugsweise in Betracht, wenn man das eigentlich maßgebende Geistesleben der damaligen Zeit ins Auge fassen will. Die Seelen der Menschen, die ich hier meine, hatten damals noch ein durchaus unmittelbares Bewußtsein davon, daß die menschlichen Gedanken nicht etwa im Kopfe ausgearbeitet werden, sondern etwas Geoffenbartes sind, sei es dem einzelnen Menschen, sei es, daß der Mensch, der selber nicht zu solcher Offenbarung imstande war, durch Mitteilung auf Vertrauen hin eine solche Offenbarung von anderen Menschen mittelbar erhalten konnte. Das heute seelisch maßgebende Gefühl bei dem Studierten und bei dem Nichtstudierten, daß Gedanken etwas sind, was man in seinem Kopfe sich selber erarbeitet, hatte man damals nicht. Man stand eigentlich gerade am Übergange. In Vorderasien drüben beschäftigten sich die hervorragendsten geistigen Persönlichkeiten mit der Frage, wie die Gedanken aus einem geistigen Reiche zu den Menschen kämen. Im Süden von Europa, im Norden von Afrika fing man eben an zu zweifeln, daß der Mensch die Fähigkeit habe, die Gedankenoffenbarungen zu empfangen. Es muß aber durchaus festgehalten werden, daß diese Zweifel erst ganz leise vorhanden waren und daß dasGefühl noch überwiegend war: Wenn ich einen Gedanken habe, so hat ein Gott ihn mir eingegeben, mag das auch indirekt sein, mag er mir durch menschliche Vererbung übermittelt sein, durch Tradition, nicht durch natürliche Vererbung. Hereinkommen in die irdische Entwickelung kann der Gedanke nur als ein geoffenbarter.
[ 4 ] Die ersten Teilnehmer am abendländischen Geistesleben, die nach dieser Richtung hin starke Zweifel hatten, waren Menschen, die aus den nördlichen Völkern in die südlichen Kulturen hineingekommen waren. Sie waren aus germanisch-keltischem Blute und vom Norden mit den verschiedenen Völkerwanderungsströmen nach dem Süden gelangt. Sie wären vielleicht aus ihrer eigenen Wesensart heraus schon dazugekommen zu sagen: Gedanken sind etwas, das wir erarbeiten. Dieses Gefühl wurde aber gedämpft durch alles das, was man als griechisch-lateinische, als morgenländische Kultur vorfand. Die Kulturen waren bis in das vierte Jahrhundert hinein in einer ganz außerordentlichen Mischung, alle möglichen Faktoren spielten da hinein. Aber das jedenfalls empfand man beim Wandern nach dem Süden stark, daß man hineinerzogen wurde in die Anschauung: Gedanken können nur dadurch von den Menschen gefaßt werden, daß sie aus einer übersinnlichen Welt in die sinnliche hereingezogen werden.
[ 5 ] Wir haben ja nur eine äußerliche Geschichte, keine Gefühls- und Gedankengeschichte, keine Seelengeschichte. Daher wird man nicht aufmerksam darauf gemacht, wie die Seelenverfassung in den aufeinanderfolgenden Jahrhunderten in der Menschheit eine ganz andere geworden ist. Es ist ungeheuer, wie stark der Umschwung im inneren menschlichen Empfinden gerade im vierten nachchristlichen Jahrhundert war. Es war damals etwas da, was zum allerersten Mal den Menschen über den Ursprung der Gedankenwelt nachdenken ließ, so daß das, was vorher eine Selbstverständlichkeit war - daß die Gedanken geoffenbart waren -, allmählich zu etwas wurde, was einer Theorie bedurfte, um eingesehen zu werden. Aber daß der Mensch aus sich selber heraus die Gedankenwelt erarbeiten könne, war für diese Seelen noch durchaus keine irgendwie überzeugende Tatsache.
[ 6 ] Bedenken Sie, welch großer Unterschied gerade in dieser Beziehung zwischen den Seelen der heutigen Zeit und den damaligen vorhanden ist. Ich spreche immer nur von einer Anzahl von Seelen. Was ich Ihnen schildere, war natürlich in den verschiedensten Nuancen vorhanden. Bei einem Teile der Menschheit war es so, wie ich es Ihnen jetzt schildere; bei einem anderen war ein noch unbesieglich starker, intensiver Glaube vorhanden, daß sich geistig-seelisches Wesen in ihrem Organismus niederlasse und die Gedanken vermittle. Es war gewissermaßen eine Art Elite der Menschheit, welche die Gedanken dazumal so faßte, daß die Frage entstehen konnte: Woher hat man die Gedanken? - Den anderen waren Gedanken etwas ganz selbstverständlich Eingegebenes.
[ 7 ] Nun nehmen Sie diejenigen Seelen, die nach dem Jahre 333 — wie gesagt approximativ — geboren worden sind. Diese Seelen konnten sich über den Ursprung des Gedankens nicht mehr aus einem natürlichen Gefühl heraus einen selbstverständlichen Aufschluß verschaffen. Die folgende Zeit war daher bei den Theoretikern, den Philosophen, den philosophischen Theologen ein Ringen danach, welche Bedeutung in der Welt eigentlich die Gedanken haben. Es kamen die Zeiten, in denen man über den Nominalismus und den Realismus stritt. Nominalisten waren im Mittelalter diejenigen, welche sagten: Die Gedanken leben eigentlich nur in der menschlichen Individualität, sind nur eine Zusammenfassung dessen, was draußen in der Welt und in den einzelnen Individuen vorhanden ist. — Realisten waren diejenigen, welche, ich möchte sagen, noch eine starke Erinnerung hatten an jene alten Zeiten, in denen die Menschen die Gedanken als etwas Substantielles, als substantiell sich Offenbarendes nahmen. Sie nahmen den Gedanken so, daß sie sich sagten: Nicht ich bin es, der den Gedanken denkt, nicht ich bin es, der alle Hunde zusammenfaßt in den allgemeinen Gedanken «Hund», sondern es gibt in Realität einen solchen Gedanken, der sich aus einer geistigen Welt heraus dem Menschen offenbart, wie sich für die Sinne die Farbe oder der Ton offenbart. - Aber es war ein Ringen danach, den Gedanken, der sich gewissermaßen nun wie ein selbständiges Gut in der Menschenseele niedergelassen hatte, in der richtigen Weise zu verstehen. Gerade von diesem Gesichtspunkte aus ist es außerordentlich interessant, sich in die Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters zu vertiefen.
[ 8 ] Je mehr wir uns dem fünfzehnten Jahrhundert nähern, desto mehr zeigt sich uns, wie die Menschen intensiv ringen, mit demjenigen zurechtzukommen, was sich durch das Denken in der menschlichen Natur offenbart. Vor dem Jahre 333 hatten die Menschen das Gefühl: Es ist wie ein Weben eines Göttlichen, das die Erde umspült, geradeso, wie im Physischen die Atmosphäre die Erde umspült, und bei diesem Umspülen bleiben im Menschen als Offenbarung Wesenheiten, die Gedanken, zurück. Es sind gewissermaßen die Spuren der die Erde umgebenden göttlichen Welt, die eingegraben werden in den Menschen als Gedanken. - Während bei den Seelen, die vor dem Jahre 333 so dachten, gerade durch die Gedankenwelt eine Empfindung des Zusammenhanges mit der geistigen Welt vorhanden war, sehen wir das Mittelalter von Tragik durchzogen, weil die Menschen versuchten, die Gedanken noch irgendwie an ein Göttlich-Geistiges anzubinden.
[ 9 ] Warum war denn bei jenen Seelen, die bis in das fünfzehnte Jahrhundert hinein, wenn ich so sagen darf, über die Gedanken dachten, ein so reges Streben vorhanden, den Gedanken an ein Göttlich-Geistiges im Weltall anzubinden? Darum, weil diese Seelen alle einen inneren Impuls in sich fühlten, den sie nicht mit klaren Begriffen ausdrücken konnten, der aber als ganz deutliches Seelenerlebnis in ihnen war. Dieser Impuls kam davon her, daß alle Seelen, welche als führende Seelen der Menschheit vom vierten bis ins vierzehnte Jahrhundert geboren worden waren, wiederverkörperte Seelen waren aus der Zeit, die verhältnismäßig mehr oder weniger weit hinter dem Jahre 333 zurücklag, und daß sich lebendig stritten über die Realität oder über das bloß Nominalistische der Begriffe solche, welche Zeitgenossen des Mysteriums von Golgatha gewesen waren.
[ 10 ] Das Mysterium von Golgatha hat sich ja in einer gewissen Einsamkeit in Vorderasien drüben zugetragen; was sich aber in Vorderasien zugetragen hat, ist nur das Äußere eines Ereignisses, das sich allerdings in der physischen Welt als ein geistiges Ereignis abgespielt hat. Da ist etwas vorgegangen in den Seelen, die eine gewisse Reife erlangt hatten. Wenn wir aber die eigentlichen Streiter um die Realität oder Irrealität der Gedanken ins Auge fassen, so sind es Seelen, die wiederverkörpert waren aus den ersten drei nachchristlichen Jahrhunderten. Im wesentlichen bestand aber die damalige zivilisierte Menschheit aus Seelen, die vor dem Mysterium von Golgatha verkörpert gewesen waren. Aus der damals durchaus vorhandenen Verbindung zwischen der Menschenseele und der göttlich-geistigen Welt, die sich dadurch ausdrückte, daß man die Gedanken ganz selbstverständlich als geoffenbarte hinnahm, aus diesem Erlebnis, das die im Mittelalter lebenden Seelen vor vielen Jahrhunderten in einem früheren Erdenleben gehabt hatten, bildete sich der Impuls heraus, um die Realität oder Irrealität der Gedankenwelt zu streiten.
[ 11 ] Was ist es denn, was man gerade an der Schwelle der neueren Zeit im dreizehnten, vierzehnten, fünfzehnten Jahrhundert als die Hochscholastik bezeichnet? Was ist es, was diese Hochscholastiker innerlich beseelte? Es ist die Tatsache, daß ein Entscheidendes in der Menschheitsentwickelung herbeigekommen ist, das nicht ausgesprochen, aber gefühlt wurde von diesen hervorragenden Seelen der eben gekennzeichneten Zeit. Es war ihnen, als ob die Götter das Gebiet der menschlichen Gedankenwelt verlassen hätten, als ob die Menschen nur noch ausgepreßte Gedanken hätten. Und wenn wir in die Seelen, die vom fünfzehnten Jahrhundert an gelebt haben, hineinschauen, so sehen wir, daß es solche waren, die in ihrem früheren Erdenleben nicht lange nach dem Jahre 333 gelebt haben, und bis ins achte, neunte nachchristliche Jahrhundert hatte wenigstens die lehrende Menschheit durchaus noch ein Gefühl dafür, daß der menschliche Gedanke gottgegeben ist. Den Menschen aber, welche in ihrem vorhergegangenen Erdenleben die Gedankenwelt schon ganz als etwas Gottverlassenes fühlten - es ist selbstverständlich wiederum nur ein Teil der Menschheit -, ihnen war es aufbehalten, um die Wende des neunzehnten, zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts geboren zu werden. Wenn wir also nicht bloß auf das äußere Schicksal, sondern auch auf das innere Schicksal der Menschenseele sehen, dann müssen wir absehen von dem, was von unserer Kindheit an aus den Tiefen, aus den Untergründen der menschlichen Seele herauf will. Wir müssen auf die Zeit hinblicken, wo jene Seelen verkörpert waren, die nicht mehr von Lehrern haben hören können, daß die Gedanken gottdurchwallte, gottdurchwirkte Wesenheiten seien. Es entstand dadurch dieses innere Gefühl, als ob man die Gedanken fliehen müsse, als ob man etwas viel Wärmeres, viel Substanzdurchtränkteres haben müsse als die Gedanken. Es entstand dieses Gefühl dadurch, daß einem schon in der vorigen Inkarnation der göttliche Charakter der Gedanken im höchsten Grade zweifelhaft geworden oder ganz verlorengegangen war. Man erlebte als Tragik dasjenige, was so aus dem vorigen Erdenleben in das jetzige hineinleuchtet, am allerstärksten um die Wende des neunzehnten, zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts. Aus der göttlich-geistigen Welt heraus Gedanken zu empfangen, war dem Menschen schon verlorengegangen seit dem ersten Drittel des fünfzehnten Jahrhunderts. Weil man aus der göttlich-geistigen Welt heraus keine Gedanken mehr erhalten konnte, griff man die Gedanken auf aus der äußeren Beobachtung. Diese und die Experimentierkunst erreichten eine solche Größe, weil an die Stelle des inneren Konzipierens das Aufklauben aus der äußeren Sinneswelt trat. Aber im weltgeschichtlichen Werden tritt nicht gleich dasjenige zutage, was nicht von äußeren Umständen abhängig ist. Denn wenn man auch schon seit dem fünfzehnten Jahrhundert die Fähigkeit verloren hatte, Gedanken von innen heraus zu konzipieren, Gedanken aus der göttlich-geistigen Welt geoffenbart zu erhalten, so waren doch diejenigen Seelen noch nicht da, welche die ganze Tragik dieses Verlassenseins von der Gedankenoffenbarung hätten empfinden können. Bei den Seelen, die noch vor dem sechsten, siebenten nachchristlichen Jahrhundert, namentlich vor dem vierten nachchristlichen Jahrhundert ihr voriges Erdenleben zugebracht haben, lebte noch im Gefühl etwas, was sich so aussprechen ließe: Wir müssen zugeben, daß wir die Gedanken von der Außenwelt empfangen; dennoch sagt uns unsere Seele, daß selbst die Gedanken, die wir von der Außenwelt empfangen, gottgegeben sind. Wir wissen nicht mehr, wie man sie als solche erlebt, aber unser Inneres sagt uns, daß sie gottgegeben sind.
[ 12 ] Ein ganz hervorleuchtender Geist mit einer solchen Seelenverfassung war Johannes Kepler. Kepler war ebensosehr Naturforscher der früheren wie der späteren Zeit. Er entnahm die Gedanken der äußeren Beobachtung, hatte aber in seinem inneren Erleben durchaus noch das Gefühl, daß göttliche Wesen dabei sind, wenn der Mensch aus der Natur heraus die Gedanken empfängt. Kepler fühlte sich ja im Grunde genommen wie ein halber Eingeweihter, und wie etwas Selbstverständliches wurde der in Abstraktion von ihm erfaßte Bau des Weltengebäudes von ihm künstlerisch durchempfunden.
[ 13 ] Es ist wissenschaftlich außerordentlich wertvoll, sich in den durch Kepler bewirkten Fortschritt der menschlichen Gedankenwelt zu vertiefen, Menschlich stärker wird man jedoch ergriffen, wenn man sich in Keplers Seelenleben vertieft. Ein solches Seelenleben war eigentlich in der späteren Zeit in dieser Intensität und Innerlichkeit bei keinem Naturforscher mehr vorhanden, vor allem bei keinem maßgebenden Lehrer des größeren Teils der Menschheit. In der Zeit zwischen dem fünfzehnten und dem neunzehnten Jahrhundert ging eben das Gefühl ganz verloren, daß in der menschlichen Seele durch den Gedanken eine Verbindung mit dem Göttlich-Geistigen gegeben ist.
[ 14 ] Wer nicht bloß grobklotzig die Zeitenfolgen studiert, indem er das Inhaltliche aufnimmt, sondern wer etwas empfinden kann an der Zeitenfolge, dem offenbart sich etwas ganz Merkwürdiges. Ich will gar nicht davon sprechen, daß die besondere Art, über die Natur zu denken, die bei Goethe vorhanden war, für die Wissenschaft der folgenden Zeit zunächst eine Unmöglichkeit geworden ist. Ich meine für die äußere Wissenschaft der folgenden Zeit, weil diese Wissenschaft gar nicht wußte, worauf die Differenz zwischen Goethe und ihr selbst beruhte. Aber davon will ich gar nicht sprechen. Sie brauchen nur naturwissenschaftliche Bücher aus dem ersten Drittel des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts in die Hand zu nehmen, die in gewissem Sinne tonangebend geworden sind für die Begründung der späteren Geistesrichtung, wie etwa Henles oder Burdachs physiologische Werke — letzterer gehört durchaus noch dem ersten Drittel des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts an, wenn sein Werk auch etwas später geschrieben ist —, und Sie werden sehen, daß in alledem noch ein anderer Stil herrscht. Es ist noch etwas von Geist da, der unmittelbar aus der Seele quillt, wenn zum Beispiel von Embryonen oder vom Bau des menschlichen Gehirns gesprochen wird. Es ist noch etwas da, was bei den Späteren ganz und gar verlorengegangen ist.
[ 15 ] Hier ist es außerordentlich bedeutsam, an eine Persönlichkeit zu erinnern, die im letzten Drittel des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts noch gewirkt hat, aber bereits dem Austreiben des geistigen Lebens aus der Wissenschaft unterlegen war, in deren Seele aber dennoch dieses Geistesleben vorhanden war — ich meine den Anatomen Hyrtl, der nur noch zum geringsten Teile dem letzten Drittel, hauptsächlich dem zweiten Drittel des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts angehört. Versuchen Sie einmal, Hyrtls Anatomiebücher auf sich wirken zu lassen. Sie sind schon im Stile der späteren Anatomen geschrieben, aber man sieht, daß Hyrtl das schwer wird. Er schreibt Kapitel nach Kapitel und muß sich überall versagen, noch etwas von Seelischem in seine Sätze einfließen zu lassen. Manchmal guckt dieses jedoch aus dem Stile, manchmal sogar aus dem Inhalt der Sätze ein wenig hervor. Aber es ist, wie wenn die eiserne Notwendigkeit bestünde, das aus dem Innern des Menschen aufsteigende Seelisch-Geistige zu tilgen, wenn man über irgendwelches Naturgeschehen schreibt. Man kann sich heute nur schwer vorstellen, was man durchleben kann, wenn man etwa von einem gegenwärtigen Anatomiebuche zurückgreift zu Hyrtl oder Burdach. Man spürt gegenüber dem geringen Grad von Wärme, die im wissenschaftlichen Empfinden des ersten und namentlich des zweiten Drittels des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts entwickelt wird, wie wenn da etwas eingeheizt würde. Gewiß war da die Wissenschaft nicht auf der Höhe. Das ist eine triviale Wahrheit, über die man sich gar nicht weiter auszulassen braucht. Aber ich spreche von dem, was der Mensch an der Wissenschaft erlebt. Und da kann man sagen: An dem inneren Gang, den die Seelen der Wissenschafter nahmen, kann man sehen, was uns Geisteswissenschaft zeigt, nämlich daß am Ende des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts immer mehr Seelen heraufkamen, die eigentlich aus dem früheren Erdenleben den Impuls nicht mehr haben, den Gedanken als ein Göttlich-Geistiges zu empfinden, nicht einmal den Nachklang davon. Die Empfindung für das einzelne vergangene Erdenleben war ja längst verlorengegangen, aber ein Nachklang davon war doch noch lange Zeit vorhanden gewesen.
[ 16 ] So standen die Seelen, die nun wirklich lebendige Wärme in sich hatten, die nicht ausgetrocknet waren durch das Vorurteil, man müsse in der Wissenschaft in dem Sinne objektiv sein, wie die Wissenschaft es zu definieren pflegt — das, was in der Geisteswissenschaft angestrebt wird, ist ja erst recht objektiv, aber nicht in dem Sinne, wie jene es meinen — und fragten: Was in uns ist denn noch verbunden mit dem Göttlich-Geistigen, von dem wir schon in der vorigen Erdeninkarnation abgerissen worden sind? - Sie fragten sich dies selbstverständlich nicht bewußt, sondern unterbewußt. Es war wirklich schon ein Auftauchen der Empfindung in das Bewußtsein, daß der Mensch seinen Zusammenhang mit der göttlich-geistigen Welt verloren hat. Aber auf der andern Seite ist es eben so, daß er ihn nicht verlieren darf, weil er ohne ein Bewußtsein dieses Zusammenhanges, sei es auch noch so dunkel, eigentlich seelisch nicht leben kann. Deshalb entstand so stark die Hinneigung zu jener unbestimmten Sehnsucht nach dem Geiste, und zu gleicher Zeit das Unvermögen, zu diesem Geiste zu kommen.
[ 17 ] Das charakterisiert gerade die heranwachsende Generation von der Wende des neunzehnten zum zwanzigsten Jahrhundert, auch von dem Beginne des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts, daß sie gewissermaßen die Frage an die älteren Generationen stellte: Gibt es denn überhaupt die Möglichkeit, in demjenigen, was einem im Erdendasein als Umgebung entgegentritt, noch ein Geistiges zu entdecken? — Und die Führer, die von der Jugend eigentlich unbewußt gefragt wurden: Wie finden wir in der Natur, wie finden wir im Menschenleben selbst das Geistige? diese Führer lehnten es als unwissenschaftlich ab, in die Betrachtung der Natur und selbst in die Betrachtung des Menschenlebens Geist hineinzubringen.
[ 18 ] In der zweiten Hälfte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts ist ja das Ungeheuerliche geschehen, daß das Schlagwort aufkommen konnte: Psychologie, Seelenkunde ohne Seele. Ich lege keinen großen Wert darauf, daß einzelne Philosophen gesagt haben, man brauche eine Seelenkunde ohne Seele. Was die Philosophen sagen, das wirkt nicht so sehr, aber es ist ein Symptom für dasjenige, was in den weitesten Kreisen als Empfindung figuriert und wonach die Jungen in der Welt behandelt werden. Gewiß haben nur wenige Philosophen ausgesprochen: Wir brauchen eine Psychologie ohne Seele. — Aber das ganze Zeitalter sagt: Wir Älteren wollen euch Mineralogie, Zoologie, Botanik, Biologie, Anthropologie, ja selbst eine Geschichte lehren, die vor euch hintritt, als wenn es höchstens seelische Erlebnisse gäbe, aber nicht eine Menschenseele.-So mußte die ganze Welt, insofern man sie wissenschaftlich betrachtete, eigentlich als seelenlos empfunden werden. Und die Seelen, die als erste aus dem vorigen Erdenleben diese Tragik der Empfindung der Seelenlosigkeit mitbrachten, mußten am stärksten fragen: Wo finden wir wiederum eine Erfüllung der Seele mit dem Geiste? — Bei dem aber, was von dem Zeitalter am meisten geschätzt wurde, in anderer Beziehung mit Recht am meisten geschätzt wurde, fanden sie am allerwenigsten Auskunft.
[ 19 ] Die Menschen, die im letzten Drittel des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts so Bücher geschrieben haben, daß man daraus etwas über ihr Seelenleben entnehmen kann, sind natürlich selbst im neunzehnten Jahrhundert die verschwindende Minorität, und ich kann Ihnen die Versicherung geben: im großen und ganzen sind diejenigen, die Bücher geschrieben haben, nicht gerade die Allergescheitesten. Es gibt unter denen, die keine Bücher geschrieben haben, wesentlich Gescheitere als die sind, die dazu kommen, Bücher zu schreiben. Wenn man aber — was durch geisteswissenschaftliche Methoden möglich ist — in diejenigen hineinschaut, die im letzten Drittel des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts als tiefere Naturen unter den oberflächlichen Naturen, die mit der geistlosen Wissenschaft zufrieden waren, gelebt haben, so findet man ein gewisses Ringen mit tiefen Problemen. Aber die dieses innerliche Leben hatten, wurden sozusagen schon nicht mehr gehört. Sie kamen nicht mehr dazu, mit ihrem Seelenleben irgendwie «führend» zu werden.
[ 20 ] Da waren viele, die herankommen sahen, was das Mikroskop in der zweiten Hälfte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts mehr und mehr mit sich brachte. Es waren solche Seelen gerade unter denen, die am Geistesleben teilnahmen, aber in dieses nicht wirklich eindrangen, weil sie mit dem geistlosen Geistesleben nicht zurechtkamen. Sie verstummten daher selbst gedanklich vor den Anschauungen der Wissenschaft. Sie erlebten aber in einer tiefen Empfindung die Frage: Wie kann man die mikroskopische Entwickelung mit der makrokosmischen Entwickelung in Zusammenhang bringen? — Immer mehr fanden sie sich vor dieses Gefühlsproblem gestellt.
[ 21 ] Dann gab es Menschen, die durch ihre Erziehung mit der geistlos werdenden wissenschaftlichen Tradition mitgingen, die von einer weiteren Ausbildung der Mikroskope immer mehr wissenschaftliche Erfolge erhofften. Aber es gab auch viele tiefer veranlagte Seelen, die der fortschreitenden Ausbildung des Mikroskops und namentlich den Ansichten, welche daraus entstanden, mit unangenehmen Empfindungen gegenüberstanden. Die Hoffnungen der einen gipfelten darin, daß, wenn man immer weiter ins Kleine hineinblicke, man auch das Lebendige immer besser würde schauen können, und andere empfanden dieses ganze Treiben, wie wenn ihnen eigentlich die Welt versinken würde. Ja, es gab durchaus Menschen, die das Mikroskopieren wie ein Ausgesaugtwerden des Seelischen empfanden. Sie werden mir nicht zumuten, in einer mystisch-phantastischen Weise ein Spottlied auf das Mikroskopieren singen zu wollen; das fällt mir gar nicht ein. Ich kenne natürlich die Verdienste des Mikroskops ganz gut und ich denke nicht daran, die Wissenschaft in irgendeinem Punkte zurückschrauben zu wollen. Was ich erzähle, sind aber Tatsachen des Seelenlebens.
[ 22 ] Diese vereinzelten Geister wurden immer seltener. Fortlage war noch einer von ihnen, der als Jenenser Professor gegen Ende des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts gelebt hat. Der sagte ungefähr: Man kann immer gründlicher in das Mikroskop hineinschauen und immer Kleineres entdecken; aber in der Kleinheit verliert sich das substantiell Wahre. Wollt ihr das wirklich schauen, was man finden will, wenn man ins Mikroskop hineinschaut, so richtet euren Blick hinaus in den unendlichen Weltenraum. In Wahrheit spricht dasjenige, was ihr da im Kleinen sucht, von den Sternen zu euch herunter. Ihr sprecht sogar von einem Geheimnis des Lebens und sucht es im Kleinen und Kleinsten. Aber im Kleinsten geht das Leben verloren; nicht für dieRealität zwar, aber für die Erkenntnis. Wiederfinden könnt Ihr es, wenn ihr es in den Sternen zu lesen versteht.
[ 23 ] Einzelne haben zwar gesagt: Das Leben wird aus dem Kosmos her AA abgetragen, aber sie suchten eine materielle Vermittlung, etwa durch Meteormassen, die den Weltenraum durchfliegen und die Keime aus anderen Welten einmal auf dieErde getragen haben. Schaut man jedoch von der Erde in den «unendlichen» Raum hinaus, so ist der Raum gar nicht unendlich. Für die mechanisch-mathematische Betrachtungsweise hat Giordano Bruno das Firmament weggenommen, aber für die innerliche Betrachtung ist es wieder da in dem Sinne, daß man nicht einfach einen Radius ziehen kann von der Erde ins Unendliche und immer weiter. In Wirklichkeit hat der Radius ein Ende, und bis da, wo er ein Ende hat, ist an der inneren Weltenperipherie überall Leben zu finden und nicht Tod. Von dieser Weltenperipherie strahlt von überall her Leben herein.
[ 24 ] Mit solchen Dingen will ich Ihnen nur andeuten, vor welche inneren Empfindungsprobleme sich die Seele um die Wende des neunzehnten zum zwanzigsten Jahrhundert gestellt sah. Es war wirklich so, daß aus der dumpfsten Seelenempfindung heraus die Frage gestellt war: Wo finden wir wiederum ein Geistiges?
[ 25 ] Sehen Sie, das ist es, was Stimmung werden muß, wenn irgendeine Phase desjenigen, was man Jugendbewegung nennt, einen richtigen Inhalt bekommen soll, die Empfindungsfrage: Wo finde ich das Geistige, wie erlebt man das Geistige?-Da handelt es sich wirklich darum, daß neben allem sehnsüchtigen Erwarten sich auch einzelne Ideale in der Jugend finden, die nach innerer Seelenarbeit drängen. Ich möchte dasjenige, was ich Ihnen morgen hierzu zu sagen haben werde, heute durch das Folgende einleiten.
[ 26 ] In dem, was ich anthroposophische Geisteswissenschaft nenne, schon in meinem Vorwort zu der «Philosophie der Freiheit», tritt Ihnen etwas entgegen, was Sie nicht erfassen können, wenn Sie sich nur jenem passiven Denken hingeben, das man heute besonders liebt, jenem gottverlassenen Denken, dem sich die meisten Menschen hingeben, und das schon im vorigen Leben gottverlassen war; sondern Sie können es nur erfassen, wenn Sie in Freiheit den inneren Impuls entwickeln, Aktivität in das Denken hineinzubringen. Sie kommen eben mit demjenigen, was in der Geisteswissenschaft lebt, nicht mit, wenn nicht jener Funke, jener Blitz hineinschlägt, durch den das Denken voller Aktivität wird. Durch diese Aktivität müssen wir uns auch wieder die Göttlichkeit des Denkens erobern.
[ 27 ] Da ist die anthroposophische Literatur und macht Anspruch darauf, daß man aktiv denken soll. Die meisten können nur passiv denken und meinen, aktiv zu denken sei nicht möglich. Es läßt sich dabei weder schlafen noch intellektualistisch träumen. Man muß mit, man muß das Denken in Bewegung setzen; in dem Augenblicke, wo man das tut, kommt man mit. Da hört auf dasjenige, was ich modernes Hellsehen nennen möchte, etwas Wunderbares zu sein. Daß das immer noch als etwas besonders Wunderbares erscheint, kommt daher, daß die Menschen noch nicht die Energie entwickeln wollen, Aktivität in das Denken hineinzutragen. Es ist oft zum Verzweifeln in dieser Beziehung. Man fühlt manchmal, wenn man diese Forderung der Aktivität an das Denken stellt, daß es dem Betreffenden zumute ist wie einem Manne, der im Straßengraben lag, seine Hände und Beine nicht bewegte, nicht einmal seine Augenlider aufmachte, und von einem Vorübergehenden gefragt wurde: Warum sind Sie so traurig? — Er antwortete: Weil ich nichts tun möchte. — Der Fragende war erstaunt darüber, denn der Liegende tat anscheinend schon seit langer Zeit nichts. Aber er wollte noch mehr «nichts tun»! Da sagte der Fragende: Ja, Sie tun ja wirklich nichts! — Darauf bekam er die Antwort: Ich muß ja die Umdrehung der Erde mitmachen, und ich möchte selbst das nicht tun.
[ 28 ] So kommen einem diejenigen vor, die durchaus nicht Aktivität in das Denken hineintragen möchten, die Kraft, die allein aus dem Menschen heraus wiederum einen Zusammenhang bringen kann zwischen der Menschenseele und dem göttlich-geistigen Weltinhalt. Viele von Ihnen haben das Denken verachten gelernt, weil es Ihnen nur als passives Denken entgegengetreten ist. Das gilt aber nur vom Kopfdenken, bei dem das Herz des Menschen nicht dabei ist. Aber versuchen Sie es einmal mit einem aktiven Denken, dann werden Sie sehen, wie dabei das Herz engagiert wird. Am intensivsten kommt der Mensch unserer Epoche in die geistige Welt hinein, wenn es ihm gelingt, das aktive Denken zu entwickeln. Denn durch das aktive Denken kommen wir dazu, in den Gedanken wiederum herzhafte Kräfte zu haben.
[ 29 ] Wenn Sie nicht den Geist auf dem Gedankenwege suchen, der herzhaft gegangen werden muß, obwohl das schwer ist, wenn Sie nicht auf diesem Wege das Geistesleben suchen, das von Urbeginn durch die Menschheit geflossen ist, so sind Sie wie der Säugling, der glaubt, sich aus sich selbst heraus ernähren zu können und nicht aus der Mutterbrust. Nur dann kommen Sie zu einer inhaltsvollen Bewegung, wenn Sie das Geheimnis finden, eine solche Aktivität in Ihrem Inneren zu entwickeln, daß sie Sie saugen läßt aus dem Weltendasein wiederum wirkliche Geistesnahrung, wirklichen geistigen Trank. Das aber ist zunächst ein Willensproblem, ein gefühlsmäßig zu erlebendes Willensproblem. Ungeheuer viel hängt heute ab von dem guten Willen, von dem energischen Willen, und kein Theoretisches wird dasjenige lösen, was wir heute suchen, sondern einzig und allein der mutige Wille, der starke Wille wird die Lösung bringen.
[ 30 ] Wollen wir uns einmal in den nächsten Tagen damit beschäftigen, wie wir den guten Willen, den starken Willen finden.
Eighth Lecture
[ 1 ] So far, we have attempted to characterize from the outside what young people experienced at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries by directing our spiritual gaze to the particular form that human intellectual culture had taken. Today, in order to find a transition to genuine self-knowledge, we want to look at human nature from within.
[ 2 ] Just as a more external view of the spiritual development of the West takes us back to the first third of the fifteenth century, so a more internal view takes us back to the fourth century AD. If you want to pick a year that marks a turning point, then it is the year 333 of our calendar. This year is, of course, only approximate; it is not meant to be exact, but rather to serve as a point of reference for important events that happened to a large part of the European population.
[ 3 ] Let us try to look into the soul of a person who, before this time, had lived in the culture that existed at that time in southern Europe, and perhaps also in certain regions of North Africa. These regions are particularly relevant if we want to understand the spiritual life that was actually decisive at that time. The souls of the people I am referring to here still had a very direct awareness that human thoughts are not worked out in the head, but are something revealed, either to the individual human being or, if the human being himself was not capable of such revelation, indirectly to him through communication based on trust from other human beings. The feeling that prevails today among educated and uneducated people alike, that thoughts are something we work out for ourselves in our heads, did not exist at that time. We were actually at a transition point. In the Near East, the most outstanding intellectual personalities were preoccupied with the question of how thoughts came to human beings from a spiritual realm. In southern Europe and northern Africa, people were just beginning to doubt that human beings had the ability to receive revelations of thoughts. It must be emphasized, however, that these doubts were only very faint at first and that the prevailing feeling was still: When I have a thought, God has given it to me, whether indirectly, through human inheritance, through tradition, or not through natural inheritance. Thoughts can only enter earthly development as revelations.
[ 4 ] The first participants in Western intellectual life who had strong doubts in this direction were people who had come from the northern peoples into the southern cultures. They were of Germanic-Celtic blood and had come from the north to the south with the various waves of migration. Perhaps their own nature would have led them to say that thoughts are something we work out. However, this feeling was dampened by everything they encountered in Greek-Latin, or Eastern, culture. Until the fourth century, cultures were an extraordinary mixture, with all kinds of factors playing a role. But in any case, when migrating south, people strongly felt that they were being drawn into the view that thoughts can only be grasped by humans when they are drawn from a supersensible world into the sensible world.
[ 5 ] We only have an external history, not a history of feelings and thoughts, not a history of the soul. Therefore, we are not made aware of how the state of the soul has changed completely over the centuries. It is tremendous how strong the change in inner human feeling was in the fourth century after Christ. At that time, something arose that caused people to think about the origin of the world of thoughts for the very first time, so that what had previously been taken for granted—that thoughts were revealed—gradually became something that required a theory in order to be understood. But the fact that human beings could develop the world of thoughts out of themselves was by no means a convincing fact for these souls.
[ 6 ] Consider what a great difference there is in this respect between the souls of today and those of that time. I am only speaking of a number of souls. What I am describing to you was, of course, present in various nuances. For some of humanity, it was as I am describing to you now; for others, there was still an invincible, intense belief that a spiritual-soul being settled in their organism and conveyed thoughts. It was, in a sense, a kind of elite of humanity who conceived of thoughts in such a way that the question arose: Where do thoughts come from? For the others, thoughts were something completely self-evident, something that was simply given to them.
[ 7 ] Now take those souls who were born after the year 333 — as I said, approximately. These souls could no longer obtain self-evident information about the origin of thought from a natural feeling. The following period was therefore a struggle among theorists, philosophers, and philosophical theologians to determine what meaning thoughts actually have in the world. There came a time when people argued about nominalism and realism. In the Middle Ages, nominalists were those who said: Thoughts actually live only in human individuality; they are only a summary of what exists outside in the world and in individual individuals. Realists were those who, I would say, still had a strong memory of those ancient times when people took thoughts as something substantial, as something that revealed itself substantially. They took thoughts in such a way that they said to themselves: It is not I who thinks the thought, it is not I who summarises all dogs in the general thought “dog”, but there is in reality such a thought which reveals itself to man from a spiritual world, just as colour or sound reveals itself to the senses. But there was a struggle to understand in the right way the thought that had now, as it were, settled in the human soul as an independent entity. It is precisely from this point of view that it is extremely interesting to delve into the intellectual history of the Middle Ages.
[ 8 ] The closer we get to the fifteenth century, the more we see how intensely people struggled to come to terms with what was revealed through thinking in human nature. Before the year 333, people had the feeling that it was like a divine weaving enveloping the earth, just as the atmosphere envelops the earth in the physical world, and that this envelopment left behind in human beings, as a revelation, beings, or thoughts. These are, in a sense, traces of the divine world surrounding the earth, which are engraved in human beings as thoughts. While the souls who thought this way before the year 333 had a sense of connection with the spiritual world precisely through the world of thoughts, we see the Middle Ages as tragic because people tried to somehow connect their thoughts to something divine and spiritual.
[ 9 ] Why was there such a lively striving among those souls who, until well into the fifteenth century, if I may say so, thought about thoughts, to connect their thoughts with something divine and spiritual in the universe? Because these souls all felt an inner impulse within themselves that they could not express in clear terms, but which was a very distinct soul experience within them. This impulse came from the fact that all souls who had been born as leading souls of humanity from the fourth to the fourteenth century were reincarnated souls from a time that lay relatively more or less far behind the year 333, and that those who had been contemporaries of the Mystery of Golgotha were engaged in a lively dispute about the reality or mere nominalism of the concepts.
[ 10 ] The Mystery of Golgotha took place in a certain solitude in the Near East; but what happened in the Near East is only the outer aspect of an event that actually took place in the physical world as a spiritual event. Something happened in the souls that had attained a certain maturity. But if we consider the actual contenders for the reality or unreality of thoughts, we find that they are souls that had been reincarnated from the first three post-Christian centuries. Essentially, however, the civilized humanity of that time consisted of souls that had been incarnated before the Mystery of Golgotha. From the connection that existed at that time between the human soul and the divine-spiritual world, which was expressed in the fact that thoughts were accepted as revealed as a matter of course, from this experience that the souls living in the Middle Ages had had many centuries earlier in a previous earthly life, the impulse arose to argue about the reality or unreality of the world of thoughts.
[ 11 ] What is it that we refer to as high scholasticism at the threshold of the modern era in the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth centuries? What was it that inspired these high scholastics? It was the fact that a decisive moment in human evolution had arrived, which was not expressed but felt by these outstanding souls of the period just described. It was as if the gods had left the realm of human thought, as if human beings had nothing left but thoughts that had been squeezed out of them. And when we look into the souls who lived from the fifteenth century onwards, we see that they were people who, in their previous earthly lives, had not lived long after the year 333, and until the eighth or ninth century AD, at least the teaching classes still had a feeling that human thought was God-given. But those people who in their previous earthly lives already felt the world of thoughts to be something completely abandoned by God—and of course this is only a part of humanity—were destined to be born at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. So if we look not only at the outer destiny but also at the inner destiny of the human soul, we must disregard what has been rising up from the depths, from the foundations of the human soul since our childhood. We must look back to the time when those souls were incarnated who could no longer hear from teachers that thoughts are beings permeated and interwoven with God. This gave rise to an inner feeling as if one had to flee from thoughts, as if one had to have something much warmer, much more imbued with substance than thoughts. This feeling arose because, already in the previous incarnation, the divine character of thoughts had become highly doubtful or had been lost altogether. What shines through from the previous earthly life into the present one was experienced as tragic, most strongly at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Receiving thoughts from the divine-spiritual world had already been lost to human beings since the first third of the fifteenth century. Because it was no longer possible to receive thoughts from the divine-spiritual world, people began to pick up thoughts from external observation. This and the art of experimentation reached such heights because inner conception was replaced by gleaning from the external sensory world. But in world history, that which is not dependent on external circumstances does not immediately come to light. For even though people had lost the ability to conceive thoughts from within, to receive thoughts revealed from the divine-spiritual world, since the fifteenth century, there were still no souls who could feel the full tragedy of this abandonment of the revelation of thoughts. In the souls who had lived their previous earthly lives before the sixth or seventh century AD, especially before the fourth century AD, there was still a feeling that could be expressed as follows: We must admit that we receive thoughts from the outside world; nevertheless, our soul tells us that even the thoughts we receive from the outside world are God-given. We no longer know how to experience them as such, but our inner being tells us that they are God-given."
[ 12 ] Johannes Kepler was a brilliant mind with such a state of mind. Kepler was as much a natural scientist of earlier times as he was of later times. He drew his thoughts from external observation, but in his inner experience he still had the feeling that divine beings are present when man receives thoughts from nature. Kepler basically felt like a half-initiate, and the structure of the world, which he grasped in abstraction, became something he felt artistically as a matter of course.
[ 13 ] It is scientifically extremely valuable to delve into the progress of human thought brought about by Kepler, but one is more deeply moved when one delves into Kepler's inner life. Such an inner life was actually no longer present in this intensity and inwardness in any natural scientist of later times, especially not in any authoritative teacher of the greater part of humanity. In the period between the fifteenth and nineteenth centuries, the feeling that there is a connection between the human soul and the divine spirit through thought was completely lost.
[ 14 ] Those who do not merely study the succession of times in a crude manner, absorbing the content, but who can feel something in the succession of times, will discover something very remarkable. I do not even want to mention that the special way of thinking about nature that existed in Goethe's time initially became impossible for the science of the following period. I mean for the external science of the following period, because this science did not know what the difference between Goethe and itself was based on. But I don't want to talk about that at all. You only need to pick up scientific books from the first third of the nineteenth century that in a certain sense became influential for the establishment of the later intellectual trend, such as Henle's or Burdach's physiological works — the latter definitely belongs to the first third of the nineteenth century, even if his work was written somewhat later — and you will see that a different style still prevails in all of them. There is still something of the spirit that springs directly from the soul when, for example, embryos or the structure of the human brain are discussed. There is still something there that has been completely lost in later works.
[ 15 ] Here it is extremely important to recall a personality who was still active in the last third of the nineteenth century, but who had already succumbed to the expulsion of intellectual life from science, yet in whose soul this intellectual life was still present — I mean the anatomist Hyrtl, who belongs only to a very small extent to the last third, and mainly to the second third of the nineteenth century. Try to let Hyrtl's anatomy books sink in. They are already written in the style of later anatomists, but you can see that Hyrtl finds this difficult. He writes chapter after chapter and has to deny himself everywhere the opportunity to let anything spiritual flow into his sentences. Sometimes, however, this peeps out a little from the style, sometimes even from the content of the sentences. But it is as if there were an iron necessity to erase the spiritual and emotional that rises from within man when writing about any natural phenomenon. Today, it is difficult to imagine what one might experience when returning from a contemporary anatomy book to Hyrtl or Burdach. One senses, in contrast to the low degree of warmth developed in the scientific sensibility of the first and especially the second third of the nineteenth century, as if something were being heated up. Certainly, science was not at its best then. That is a trivial truth that needs no further elaboration. But I am talking about what people experience in science. And here we can say that the inner journey taken by the souls of scientists shows us what spiritual science reveals, namely that at the end of the nineteenth century more and more souls were emerging who no longer had the impulse from their previous earthly lives to perceive thought as something divine and spiritual, not even an echo of it. The feeling for the individual past life on earth had long since been lost, but an echo of it had remained for a long time.
[ 16 ] Thus stood the souls who now had real living warmth within them, who had not been dried up by the prejudice that one must be objective in science in the sense that science defines it — for what is sought in spiritual science is indeed objective, but not in the sense that they mean it — and they asked: What in us is still connected with the divine-spiritual from which we were torn in our previous incarnation on earth? Of course, they did not ask themselves this consciously, but subconsciously. It was really already an emergence of the feeling into consciousness that human beings have lost their connection with the divine-spiritual world. But on the other hand, it is just as true that he must not lose it, because without an awareness of this connection, however dim, he cannot actually live spiritually. This is why there arose such a strong inclination toward that indefinable longing for the spirit, and at the same time the inability to attain this spirit.
[ 17 ] This is precisely what characterizes the generation growing up at the turn of the nineteenth to the twentieth century, and also at the beginning of the twentieth century, in that they asked the older generations, as it were: Is it even possible to discover anything spiritual in the environment that confronts us in our earthly existence? — And the leaders, who were actually asked this question unconsciously by the youth: How do we find the spiritual in nature, how do we find it in human life itself? These leaders rejected it as unscientific to bring spirit into the contemplation of nature and even into the contemplation of human life.
[ 18 ] In the second half of the nineteenth century, something monstrous happened: the slogan arose: psychology, soul science without the soul. I do not attach much importance to the fact that individual philosophers have said that we need a psychology without a soul. What philosophers say does not have much effect, but it is a symptom of what is felt in the widest circles and of how young people are treated in the world. Certainly, only a few philosophers have said outright: We need a psychology without a soul. But the whole age says: We older people want to teach you mineralogy, zoology, botany, biology, anthropology, even a history that stands before you as if there were at most spiritual experiences, but not a human soul. Thus, the whole world, insofar as it was viewed scientifically, had to be perceived as soulless. And the souls who were the first to bring this tragedy of feeling soulless from their previous earthly lives had to ask most urgently: Where can we find fulfillment of the soul with the spirit? — But in what was most valued by the age, and rightly so in other respects, they found the least answer.
[ 19 ] The people who wrote books in the last third of the nineteenth century in such a way that one can learn something about their inner lives are, of course, a vanishing minority even in the nineteenth century, and I can assure you that, on the whole, those who wrote books are not exactly the most intelligent. There are people who have not written books who are much smarter than those who do. But if you look—as you can with methods from the humanities—at those who lived in the last third of the nineteenth century as deeper natures among the superficial natures who were satisfied with mindless science, you find a certain struggle with deep problems. But those who had this inner life were, so to speak, no longer heard. They no longer had the opportunity to become “leaders” in their spiritual life in any way.
[ 20 ] There were many who saw what the microscope was increasingly bringing with it in the second half of the nineteenth century. Such souls were found among those who participated in intellectual life but did not really penetrate it because they could not cope with the spiritless intellectual life. They therefore fell silent, even in their thoughts, when confronted with the views of science. However, they experienced a deep feeling of questioning: How can microscopic development be related to macrocosmic development? More and more people found themselves faced with this emotional problem.
[ 21 ] Then there were people who, through their education, went along with the spiritless scientific tradition and hoped for more and more scientific successes from the further development of microscopes. But there were also many deeply sensitive souls who viewed the progressive development of the microscope, and especially the views that arose from it, with unpleasant feelings. The hopes of some culminated in the belief that if one looked further and further into the small, one would also be able to see living things better and better, while others felt that all this activity was as if the world were actually sinking. Yes, there were definitely people who felt that microscopy was like having their souls sucked out. You will not expect me to sing a mocking song about microscopy in a mystical and fantastical way; that would not occur to me. Of course, I am well aware of the merits of the microscope, and I have no intention of wanting to scale back science in any way. What I am describing, however, are facts of the soul's life.
[ 22 ] These isolated spirits became increasingly rare. Fortlage was one of the last of them, a professor in Jena who lived at the end of the nineteenth century. He said something like this: You can always look deeper into the microscope and discover smaller and smaller things, but in smallness the substantial truth is lost. If you really want to see what you are looking for when you look into the microscope, turn your gaze out into the infinite space of the universe. In truth, what you are looking for in the small things speaks to you from the stars. You even speak of a mystery of life and seek it in the small and smallest things. But in the smallest things, life is lost; not for reality, but for knowledge. You can find it again if you know how to read it in the stars.
[ 23 ] Individuals have said: Life is carried away from the cosmos, but they sought a material medium, such as meteor masses flying through space and once carrying germs from other worlds to Earth. However, if one looks out from Earth into “infinite” space, space is not infinite at all. Giordano Bruno removed the firmament from the mechanical-mathematical view, but for inner contemplation it is there again in the sense that one cannot simply draw a radius from the Earth into infinity and beyond. In reality, the radius has an end, and up to where it ends, life can be found everywhere on the inner periphery of the world, not death. From this periphery of the world, life radiates in from all directions.p>
[ 24 ] With such things, I only want to hint at the inner problems of perception that the soul faced at the turn of the nineteenth to the twentieth century. It was really the case that out of the dullest soul feeling the question was asked: Where can we find something spiritual again?
[ 25 ] You see, this is what must become the mood if any phase of what is called the youth movement is to have real content, the question of feeling: Where can I find the spiritual, how can I experience the spiritual? It is really a matter of individual ideals emerging in young people alongside all their longing expectations, ideals that urge them to engage in inner soul work. I would like to introduce what I have to say on this subject tomorrow with the following remarks today.
[ 26 ] In what I call anthroposophical spiritual science, already in my preface to The Philosophy of Freedom, you encounter something that you cannot grasp if you give yourself over to the passive thinking that is so popular today, that godless thinking to which most people give themselves over and which was already godless in the previous life; You can only grasp it if you freely develop the inner impulse to bring activity into your thinking. You cannot keep up with what lives in spiritual science unless that spark, that flash strikes you, filling your thinking with activity. Through this activity, we must also recapture the divinity of thinking.
[ 27 ] There is the anthroposophical literature, which demands that we think actively. Most people can only think passively and believe that active thinking is not possible. It is not a matter of sleeping or intellectual dreaming. You have to go along with it, you have to set your thinking in motion; the moment you do that, you come along with it. Then what I would call modern clairvoyance ceases to be something wonderful. The fact that it still seems particularly wonderful is because people are not yet willing to develop the energy to bring activity into their thinking. It is often exasperating in this respect. When one makes this demand for activity in thinking, one sometimes feels that the person concerned feels like a man lying in a ditch, not moving his hands or legs, not even opening his eyelids, and being asked by a passer-by: Why are you so sad? He replied, “Because I don't want to do anything.” The questioner was astonished, because the man lying there had apparently been doing nothing for a long time. But he wanted to “do nothing” even more! So the questioner said, “Yes, you really are doing nothing!” To which he replied, “I have to go along with the rotation of the earth, and I don't even want to do that.”
[ 28 ] This is how those appear who do not want to bring any activity into their thinking, the power that alone can bring about a connection between the human soul and the divine-spiritual content of the world. Many of you have learned to despise thinking because it has only ever appeared to you as passive thinking. But this only applies to intellectual thinking, which does not involve the human heart. Try active thinking, and you will see how it engages the heart. People of our age enter the spiritual world most intensely when they succeed in developing active thinking. For it is through active thinking that we come to have heartfelt forces in our thoughts.
[ 29 ] If you do not seek the spirit through the path of thought, which must be followed wholeheartedly, even though it is difficult, if you do not seek the spiritual life that has flowed through humanity since the beginning, you are like an infant who believes it can feed itself and does not need its mother's breast. Only then will you come to a meaningful movement, when you find the secret of developing such an activity within yourself that it allows you to suck real spiritual nourishment, real spiritual drink, out of the world's existence. But this is first and foremost a problem of will, a problem of will that must be experienced emotionally. An enormous amount depends today on good will, on energetic will, and nothing theoretical will solve what we are looking for today; only courageous will, strong will, will bring the solution.
[ 30 ] Let us spend the next few days thinking about how we can find good will, strong will.