Earthly and Cosmic Man
GA 133
14 May 1912, Berlin
6. The Mission of the Earth. Wonder, Compassion and Conscience. The Christ Impulse.
The question as to the meaning and purpose of existence frequently arises in life and in the sphere of philosophy. Study of Spiritual Science will certainly produce a kind of humility in regard to this question, for although we know that investigation of the spiritual worlds leads thought and perception beyond the material world of sense, we also realise that it is not possible to speak forthwith about the primal origins or the ultimate and highest meaning of life. The retort of superficial thinking here will certainly be: “What, then, do we know, if knowledge of the meaning and purpose of life is beyond our reach? ”
An analogy that is entirely in line with the attitude of Spiritual Science and indicates what is permissible or not permissible in regard to this question, can be put in the following way: Suppose a man wants to journey somewhere—In his home town he can only get information as to how to reach a much less distant place, but he is sent off with the assurance that once there, further help will be available. Although he makes inquiries here and there as he goes along, he cannot know the exact path which will bring him to his final destination; nevertheless he is sure of arriving eventually because he is always able to find his way from place to place.
As students of Spiritual Science, we do not ask about the “ultimate goal” but about the one lying immediately ahead, in other words, about the goal of the Earth. We realise that it would be senseless to inquire about the “ultimate goal” for we have recognised that “evolution” is a reality in the life of man. It must therefore never be forgotten that at the present stage of our existence it is not possible to understand the goals of much later phases of evolution and that a higher vantage-point must be reached if we are to understand the meaning of a far distant goal. And so we ask about the goal lying immediately ahead, realising that by keeping it before us as an ideal and striving with the right means, we shall eventually attain it, thereby reaching a further stage in development. At that stage it will be legitimate to ask about the “next” goal, and so on. Thus if it were ever suggested that Spiritual Science might tend to make a man arrogant because his outlook extends beyond the ordinary world into a spiritual world, in reality his attitude will be one of humility towards these sublime matters about which superficial questions are so often asked.
We inquire, to begin with, about the goal of the Earth. In other words: What is it that man adds, essentially, to the fruits of the preceding periods of Saturn-, Sun-, and Moon-evolution, by developing on the Earth through repeated physical incarnations? We will here recall certain matters which will help us to associate concrete and definite ideas with what may be called the “meaning and purpose of Earth-evolution.” Let me speak, to begin with of the following.
When intellectual thinking, based upon reason, came to birth during the Graeco-Latin epoch—it would actually be true to say, in the sixth century B.C.—a certain thought found frequent utterance, namely, that all philosophy, all deeper contemplation upon the secrets of existence, proceeds from Wonder, Amazement. In other words: As long as the human being can feel no wonder at the phenomena of life around him, so long is his life vapid and thoughtless, and he asks without intelligence about the why and wherefore of existence. “All philosophy begins with wonder” was a much quoted saying during the ancient Graeco-Latin epoch. What, in reality, does it signify in man's life of soul?
It would be difficult today to find anyone in civilised Europe who has never set eyes on a locomotive in motion; not so very long ago, however, there were such persons—although nowadays they would, of course, only be found in very remote districts. If such a person sees a train moving along, he will feel wonder and amazement at the sight of an object going forward without any of the means with which he is acquainted. It is a known fact that many such people, in their astonishment at seeing a locomotive in movement, asked if the horses pulling it along were inside! Why were the people cast into amazement and wonder by what they saw here? It was because they were looking at something which in a certain sense was known, and at the same time unknown to them. They knew that things move forward, but whatever they had seen had always been provided with quite a different means of movement. Now they were looking at something on which they had never set eyes before. And this gave rise to wonder.
If during the Graeco-Latin epoch, men could only become philosophers when they were capable of wonder, they must have been persons who perceived, in everything taking place in the world, something at once known and unknown, in so far as the happenings and phenomena seemed to contain more than appeared on the surface—something unknown to them.
Why had the attitude of the philosophers to be that the primary causes and certain attributes of things in the world lay in a sphere unknown to them? As it will be admitted that philosophers are at least as clever as people who give no thought at all to what goes on around them, it cannot be supposed that philosophers are capable of accepting only what is to be perceived by means of the ordinary senses. Therefore they must find something lacking—or rather, they must surmise the presence of something which sets them wondering—something that is not present in the world of sense. And so, before the days of materialism, the philosophers always sought for the Supersensible in the phenomena presented to the senses. The wonder felt by the philosophers, therefore, is associated with the fact that certain things are not to be comprehended through what presents itself to the eyes of sense. They said to themselves: “What I there perceive does not tally with what I picture it to be; I must therefore conceive that super-sensible forces are present within it.” But in the world of sense the philosophers perceived no super-sensible forces. That alone is enough to make a thinking man realise that a subconscious memory, not reaching into consciousness, has persisted in the human being since times when the soul perceived something more than the actual phenomena of the sense-world. In other words: Remembrance arises of experiences undergone before the descent into sense-existence. It is as though the soul were to say: “I discern things and their effects which can only call forth wonder in me, because they are different from what I have seen before; enlightenment on them can only be found by means of forces which must be drawn from the super-sensible world.” And so all philosophising begins with wonder, because in reality man approaches the phenomena of existence as a being who comes into the world of the senses from a super-sensible world and finds that the things of the sense-world do not tally with what he perceived in the super-sensible world. Wonder arises in him when the form in which the things of sense are made manifest, can only be explained by knowledge he once possessed in a super-sensible world. And so wonder points to the connection of man with the super-sensible world, to something belonging to a sphere he can only enter when he transcends the world in which his physical body encloses him. This is one indication of the fact that here, in this physical world, there is a continual urge within the human being to reach out beyond himself. A man who can only remain shut up in himself, who is not driven by wonder beyond the field of the “I,” of the ordinary Ego, remains one who cannot reach beyond himself, who sees the sun rise and set without a thought and with complete unconcern. This is the kind of existence led by uncivilised peoples.
A second power which releases the human being from the ordinary world, leading him at once away from material perception into super-sensible insight, is Compassion, Fellow-feeling (Of this, too, I have spoken). Those who go heedlessly through the world do not regard compassion as having any great mystery about it; but to the thoughtful, compassion is a great and mysterious secret. When we look at a being only from outside, impressions come from him to our senses and intellect; with the awakening of compassion we pass beyond the sphere of these impressions. We share in what is taking place in his innermost nature, and transcending the sphere of our own “I”, we pass over into his world. In other words: we are set free from ourselves, we break through the barriers of ordinary existence in the physical body and reach over into the other being. Here, already, is the Supersensible—for neither the operations of the senses nor of the reasoning mind can carry us into the sphere of another's soul. The fact that compassion exists in the world bears witness that even in the world of sense we can be set free from, can pass out beyond ourselves and enter into the world of another being. If a man is incapable of compassion, there is a moral defect, a moral lack in him. If at the moment when he should get free from himself and pass over into the other being, feeling, not his own pain or joy but the pain or joy of that other—if at that moment his feelings fade and die away, then something is lacking in his moral life. The human being on Earth, if he is to reach the stature of full and complete manhood, must be able to pass out beyond his own earthly life, he must be able to live in another, not only in himself.
Conscience is a third power whereby the human being transcends what he is in the physical body. In ordinary life he will desire this or that; according to his impulses or needs he will pursue what is pleasing and thrust aside what is displeasing to him. But in many such actions he will be his own critic, in that his conscience, the voice of his conscience sounds a note of correction. Final satisfaction or dissatisfaction with what he has done also depends upon how the voice of conscience has spoken. This in itself is a proof that “conscience” is a power whereby the human being is led out beyond the sphere of his impulses, his likes and dislikes.
Wonder and Amazement, Compassion or Fellow-feeling, Conscience—these are the three powers by means of which the human being, even while in the physical body, transcends his own limitations, for through these powers, influences which cannot find entrance into the human soul by way of the intellect and the senses, ray into physical life.
It is easy to understand that these three powers can only unfold through incarnations in a body of flesh. Man must, as it were, be kept separate by a body of flesh from what pours into his life of soul from another sphere. If a body of flesh did not separate him from the spiritual world and present the outer world to him as a sense-world, he would be incapable of wonder. It is the material body which enables wonder at the things of the world of sense to arise in man, compelling him to seek for the Spirit. Compassion could not unfold if the one human being were not separated from the other, if men were to live an undivided existence in which a single flow of spiritual life pervaded the consciousness of them all, if each soul were not separated from other souls by the impenetrable sheath provided by the physical body. And conscience could not be experienced as a spiritual force sending its voice into man's world of natural urges, passions and desires, if the material body did not hanker after things against which warning must be given by another power. And so the human being must be incarnated in a physical body in order that he may be able to experience wonder, compassion and conscience.
In our time, people concern themselves little with such secrets, although they are profoundly enlightening. But in a past by no means very remote, a great deal of attention was paid to these things:—
Think only of the world of the Greek Gods, the Gods of Homer; think of their actions and activities; try to understand the nature of the impulses working in Achilles, a being who stands there like a last survivor of an earlier generation on Earth. He, too, was born of a divine mother. Read through the Iliad and the Odyssey and ask yourselves whether this being, standing halfway between Gods and men, was ever stirred by anything like “conscience” or “compassion”? Homer builds the whole of the Iliad around the fury of the “wrath” of Achilles—and wrath is a passion. Everything in the Greek legend centres around this; the Iliad tells of what came about as the result of a passion—the wrath of Achilles. Consider all the deeds of Achilles described in the Iliad and see if you can say of a single one that Achilles is here moved by anything like compassion or conscience. Neither is there a single example of the stirring of wonder. The very greatness of Homer lies in his power to depict these things with such sublimity. When Achilles is told of some terrible happening, his behaviour is far from that of a man filled with wonder. And then turn to the Greek Gods themselves: they give vent to all kinds of impulses which are certainly of the nature of egotism when they manifest in a human being enclosed in a physical body. In the Gods they are spiritual impulses. But among the Greek Gods there is no compassion, no suggestion of conscience, nor anything like wonder. Why not? Because Homer and the Greeks knew that these Gods were Beings belonging to a period of evolution preceding that of the Earth—a period when the Beings who were then passing through their “human stage” under the conditions prevailing in existence, had not yet received into the life of soul the powers of wonder, compassion and conscience. It must be constantly remembered that the earlier planetary conditions through which the Earth has passed and in which such Beings as the Greek Gods underwent their human stage, were not there for the purpose of implanting “Wonder,” “Compassion,” and “Conscience” in the life of soul. That is precisely the mission of Earth-evolution! The purpose of Earth-evolution is that there may be implanted into the evolutionary process as a whole, powers which could otherwise never have come into existence: Wonder, Compassion and Conscience.
I have told you how the birth of conscience can clearly be traced to a certain period of Greek culture. In the works of Aeschylus, what we call “conscience” played no part; there were only remembrances of the avenging Furies, and not until we come to the works of Euripedes is there any clear expression of “conscience” as we know it now. The concept of conscience arose only very gradually during the Graeco-Latin epoch. I have told you that the concept of wonder arises for the first time when men begin to philosophise in the world of Graeco-Latin culture. And a remarkable fact in the spiritual evolution of Earth-existence throws far-reaching light upon what we know as compassion, and also, in the true sense, love. In the age of materialism it is exceedingly difficult to maintain in true and right perspective, this concept of compassion or love. Many of you will realise that in our materialistic times this concept is distorted, in that materialism associates the concept of “love” so closely with that of “sexuality”—with which, fundamentally, it has nothing whatever to do. That is a point where the culture of our day abandons both intelligence and sound, healthy reason. Through its materialism, evolution in our time is veering not only towards the unintelligent and illogical but even towards the scandalous, when “love” is dragged into such close association with what is covered by the term “sexuality.” The fact that under certain circumstances the element of sexuality may be associated with love between man and woman is no argument for bringing so closely together the all-embracing nature of love or compassion, and the entirely specific character of sexuality. So far as logic is concerned, to associate the concept of, say, a “railway engine” with that of a man being “run over,” because engines do sometimes run over people, would be just about as intelligent as it is to connect the concept of love so closely with that of sexuality—simply because under certain circumstances there is an outward association. That this happens today is not the outcome of any scientific hypothesis but of the irrational and, to some extent, unhealthy mode of thinking prevailing in our time.
On the other hand, another telling fact points to the significance inherent in the concept of love and compassion. At a certain point in the evolution of humanity, and among all the peoples, something is made manifest which, while differing in many essentials, is identical in one respect all over the Earth, namely in the adoption of the concept of love, of compassion. It is very remarkable that six or seven centuries before the inpouring of the Christ-Impulse into humanity, founders of religion and systems of thought appeared all over the Earth, among all the peoples. It is of the highest significance that, six centuries before our era, Lao-tse and Confucius should have been living in China, the Buddha in India, the last Zarathustra (not the original Zarathustra) in Persia, and Pythagoras in Greece. How great the difference is between these founders of religion! Only a mind abstracted from reality and incapable of discerning the differences can suggest, as is often mischievously done today, that the teachings of Lao-tse or Confucius do not differ from those of other founders of religions. Yet in one respect there is similarity among them all; they all teach that compassion and love must reign between soul and soul! The point of significance is this: six centuries before our era, consciousness begins to stir that love and compassion are to be received into the stream of human evolution. Thus whether we are thinking of the birth of wonder, of conscience or of love and compassion in the stream of evolution ... all the signs point to the fact that in the Fourth Post-Atlantean epoch of culture, something was imbued into mankind which we may recognise as the “meaning and purpose of Earth-evolution.”
It is so superficial and foolish when people say: “Why was it necessary for man to come down from the worlds of Divine Spirit into the physical world, only to have to reattain them? Why could he not have remained in the higher worlds?” Man could not remain in those worlds because only by coming down into the physical world of Earth-evolution could he receive into himself the forces of wonder, love or compassion, and conscience or moral obligation.
We look at the Fourth Post-Atlantean epoch of culture and perceive, during its course, the dawn of impulses which—in reality only from that time onwards—spread more and more widely among mankind. It is very easy today to emphasise how seldom humanity is ruled by compassion and love, how seldom by conscience. But in pointing to these things, we must also be mindful of the fact that in the Graeco-Latin age, slavery was still an accepted custom, and that even a philosopher as great as Aristotle still regarded the existence of slaves as a necessary principle of human life; we must also remember that since those days, love has so far gained ground that even if today inequalities still persist among men, there is already present in their souls something like a feeling of shame that certain conditions exist. This in itself indicates that the forces which entered at that time into evolution are unfolding within the souls of men. Nobody would dare nowadays—if he is to avoid the tragic fate of Nietzsche—(the “followers” of Nietzsche can be ignored altogether, for in his right mind Nietzsche would have repudiated them)—to stand openly for the introduction of slavery as it was in Greece. Nobody will deny that the greatest of all forces in the human soul is that of love and compassion, and that it must be man's task to make the voice that sounds out of another world into the soul, more and more articulate.
Holding firmly in our minds that the unfolding of the three powers described constitutes the meaning and purpose of Earth-evolution, we turn to the greatest of all Impulses—the Christ-Impulse which poured into evolution during the Fourth Post-Atlantean epoch. Even outer circumstances indicate that this Impulse is given at the very time when the Earth is ready for the development of the three powers of wonder, compassion or love, and conscience, or moral obligation, as intrinsically human qualities. Many studies have given us a picture of how the Christ-Impulse made its way into the evolution of humanity.
I want here to refer to one aspect of the Christ-Impulse. I have told you that certain spiritual, superhuman forces were held back in the spiritual worlds at the beginning of the evolutionary process on the Earth. This Impulse streamed into the Earth at the time of which an indication is given in the Bible, namely, at the time of the Baptism in the Jordan. It was an Impulse, therefore, untouched by the Luciferic forces as it had been kept back until the Fourth Post-Atlantean epoch; in that epoch it streamed into humanity. And now think of this in connection with certain things we have ourselves experienced.—If people are incapable of giving any concrete explanation of how the spiritual world plays into the physical world, it is really out of place for them to come out with crude and unreal ideas like that, for example, of the “Three Logoi.” I have said many times that the word “Logoi” can convey to the ordinary intelligence nothing more than its five letters. When it is alleged in certain quarters outside that here we speak of Christ as the “second Logos,” we do well to realise that misrepresentation and distortion are the order of the day. We ourselves are quoted as the source of statements which have actually originated somewhere else! Our constant endeavour is to deepen, to widen and to gather from every side, knowledge that can shed light on the Christ Idea. Yet outside our field of work, by talking round an abstract concept, people allege that we speak of the Christ as the “Second Logos.” In the Theosophical Society, conscience ought to be too sharp to permit such allegations. So long as sheer misrepresentation of other people's views is possible, the Theosophical Movement cannot be said to have reached any particularly high level, and while this sort of thing goes on, it is futile to boast about freedom of opinion in the Society. This is an empty phrase as long as people allow themselves to spread false ideas of the views held by others. Certainly there must be freedom to spread every shade of opinion—but not freedom to misrepresent the views of others! Spiritual conscience must be sharpened in this respect; otherwise all feeling for truth would in the end be driven out of the Theosophical Movement and then it would not be possible to cultivate the true spiritual Movement within the framework of the “Theosophical Movement.” These things must not be glossed over but taken really seriously. Certainly, there may be fewer publications, if the aim is to print only those things which are founded upon genuine, reliable knowledge. But after all, what harm will be done if there is less printing? What does it matter if less is said, so long as what is said is true and in accordance with reality? It was recently stated in periodicals abroad that the Christ is spoken of by us as the “Second Logos” and that we are said to be cultivating a “narrow” Theosophy, suitable for Germany, but not for any other country; we are said to be cultivating a “narrow” Theosophy, whereas a really “broad” Theosophical Movement is being conducted from a certain centre in Leipzig of which you have heard. When things of this kind are to be read, it can only be concluded that there does not exist in the Theosophical Movement the sharpness of conscience that is the pre-requisite of a spiritual movement. And if we lack this sharpness of conscience, if we do not feel, the most intense responsibility to the holiest truth, we shall make no progress on any other path. These things have had to be said. And within the Theosophical Movement it will above all be necessary to have eyes for the quality of love and compassion.
If we conceive the Christ Impulse to be the down-pouring of that spiritual power which was kept back in the ancient Lemurian time in order to flow into evolution during the Fourth Post-Atlantean epoch at the point marked by the Baptism in the Jordan, reaching its culmination in the Mystery of Golgotha—then it is clear that He Who is known as the “Christ” was not, even at that time, incarnated in the ordinary sense, in a physical human being. We know what complicated processes were connected with the man “Jesus of Nazareth” in order that for three years of his life the Christ Impulse might live within him. We are therefore able to understand that for three years the Christ Impulse lived on the Earth in the three sheaths of a human being, but we realise, too, that even at that time, the Christ Impulse was not “incarnated” on the Earth in the ordinary sense but that He “pervaded” the body of the Being “Jesus of Nazareth.” This must be understood when it is said that it is not possible to speak of a “return” of Christ, but only of an Impulse which was present once, during the time of the events in Palestine beginning with the Baptism in the Jordan, when there remained only the physical body, the ether-body and the astral body of Jesus of Nazareth; within these sheaths the Christ was then present on the very soil of the Earth. From that time Christ has been united with the spiritual atmosphere of the Earth and can there be found by souls who are willing to receive Him. From that time onwards—and only from that time onwards—He has been present in the spiritual atmosphere of the Earth. The great turn given to Earth-evolution lies in the fact that from that time forward there was a power in the Earth which it did not previously contain.
We know that what we actually see in the kingdoms of Nature around us is not reality, but “Maya,” the “Great Illusion”. In the kingdom of the animals we see the individual forms coming into being and passing away; the Group-Soul alone endures. In the plant kingdom, the individual plants appear and disappear, but behind them there is the Earth-Spirit which does not pass away. So it is, too, in the kingdom of the minerals. The Spiritual endures, but the Physical, whether in the animal, plant or mineral kingdom, is transient, impermanent. Even the outer senses discern that the planet Earth is involved in a process of pulverisation and will at some future time disintegrate into dust. We have spoken of how the Earth-body will be cast off by the Spirit of the Earth, as the human body is cast off by the individual human Spirit. What will remain as the highest substance of the Earth when its goal has been reached? The Christ Impulse was present on the Earth, so to say as “spiritual Substance.” That Impulse endures and will be received into men during the course of Earth-evolution. But how does It live on? When the Christ Impulse was upon the Earth for three years, It had no physical body, no ether-body, no astral body of Its own, but was enveloped in the three sheaths of Jesus of Nazareth. When the goal has been reached, the Earth, like man, will be a fully developed being, a meet and fitting vehicle for the Christ Impulse.
But from whence are the three sheaths of the Christ Impulse derived? From forces that can be unfolded only on the Earth. Beginning with the Mystery of Golgotha, whatever has unfolded on the Earth since the Fourth Post-Atlantean period as the power of wonder, whatever comes to life in us as wonder—passes, finally, to the Christ, weaving the Astral Body of the Christ Impulse. Love or Compassion in the souls of men weaves the Ether-Body of the Christ Impulse; and the power of conscience which from the time of the Mystery of Golgotha until the goal of the Earth is attained, lives in and inspires the souls of men, weaves the Physical Body—or what corresponds with the physical body—for the Christ Impulse.1See also: Christ and the Twentieth Century (25.1.12). Published in the volume entitled: Turning Points of Spiritual History.
The true meaning of words from the Gospel can only now be discerned: “Whatsoever ye have done to one of the least of these My Brethren, ye have done it unto Me.” (Matt. 25. 40). The forces streaming from man to man are the units integrating the Ether-Body of Christ: love, or compassion, weaves the Ether-Body of Christ. Thus when the goal of Earth-evolution is attained, He will be enveloped in the threefold vesture woven from the powers that have lived in men—and which, when the limitations of the “ I,” have been transcended, become the sheaths of Christ.
And now think of how men live in communion with Christ. From the time of the Mystery of Golgotha to the attainment of the goal of Earth-evolution, man grows more perfect in that he develops to the stature that is within his reach as a being endowed with the power of the “ I.” But men are united with the Christ Who has come among them, in that they transcend their own “ I ”—and through wonder, build the Astral Body of Christ. Christ does not build His own Astral Body, but in the wonder that arises in their souls, men share in the forming of the Astral Body of Christ. His Ether-Body will be fashioned through the compassion and love flowing from man to man; and His “physical body” through the power of conscience unfolding in human beings. Whatever wrongs are committed in these three realms deprive the Christ of the possibility of full development on the Earth—that is to say, Earth-evolution is left imperfect. Those who go about the Earth with indifference and unconcern, who have no urge to understand what the Earth can reveal to them, deprive the Astral Body of Christ of the possibility of full development; those who live without unfolding compassion and love, hinder the Ether-Body of Christ from full development; and those who lack conscience hinder the development of what corresponds with the Physical Body of Christ ... but this means that the Earth cannot reach the goal of its evolution.
The principle of Egotism has to be overcome in Earth-evolution. The Christ Impulse penetrates more and more deeply into the life and culture of humanity and the conviction that this Impulse has lived its way into mankind, free from every trace of denominationalism—as, for example, in the paintings of Raphael, this conviction will bear its fruit. How Christ may truly be portrayed is a problem still to be solved. Men on Earth will have to be greatly enriched in their life of feeling if, after the many attempts made through the centuries, another is to succeed to some slight extent in expressing what the Christ is as the super-sensible Impulse living on through Earth-evolution. The attempts made hitherto do not even suggest what form such a portrayal of Christ should take. For it would have to express how the enveloping sheaths woven of the forces of wonder, compassion and conscience are gradually made manifest. The countenance of Christ must be so vital and living that it is an expression of the victory won over the sensory, desire-nature in men of Earth—victory achieved through the very forces which have spiritualised the countenance. There must be sublime power in this countenance. The painter or sculptor will have to express in the unusual form of the chin and mouth, the power of conscience unfolded to its highest degree. The mouth must convey the impression that it is not there for the purpose of taking food but to give utterance to whatever moral strength and power of conscience has been cultivated by men through the ages; the very structure of the bones around the teeth in the lower jaw will seem to form themselves into a mouth. All this will have to be expressed in the countenance. The form of the lower part of the face will have to express a power whose outstreaming rays seem to shatter the rest of the way that certain other forces are vanquished. With a mouth like this, it will be impossible to give the Christ Figure a bodily form similar to that possessed by the physical human being today. On the other hand, all the power of compassion will flow out of His eyes—the power that eyes alone can contain—not in order to receive impressions but to bear the very soul into the joys and sufferings of others. His brow will give no suggestion of thought based upon earthly sense-impressions. It will be a brow conspicuously prominent above the eyes, arching over that part of the brain; it will not be a “thinker's” brow which merely works upon material already there. Wonder will be made manifest in this projecting brow which curves gently backwards over the head, expressing wonder and marvel at the mysteries of the world. It will be a head such as is nowhere to be found in physical humanity.
Every true representation of the Christ must be a portrayal of the Ideal embodied in Him. When man reaches out towards this highest Ideal and strives through Spiritual Science to represent it in Art, this feeling will arise in greater and greater strength:—If you would portray the Christ, you must not look at what is actually there in the world, but you must let your whole being be quickened and pervaded by all that flows from contemplation of the spiritual evolution of the world, inspired by the three great impulses of Wonder, Compassion and Conscience.
Sechster Vortrag
Sie wissen, daß eine oftmals wiederholte Frage des Lebens und auch der Philosophie die ist nach dem sogenannten Sinn des ganzen Daseins. Nun haben wir uns ja wohl im Laufe der Zeit durch unsere geisteswissenschaftliche Arbeit ein wenig Bescheidenheit gerade in der Beziehung angewöhnt, die hier in Betracht kommt. Wir wissen, daß der Mensch zwar durch die Erforschung der geistigen Welten über die gewöhnliche Sinneswelt hinausschaut oder denkt; aber wir wissen auch, daß wir uns keineswegs anmaßen können, irgendwie gleich zu sprechen von den letzten Ursprüngen oder dem letzten und höchsten Sinn des Lebens. Das oberflächliche Denken wird ja allerdings da einwenden: Was wissen wir dann überhaupt, wenn wir nichts wissen können von dem Sinn des Lebens?
Wir haben schon öfter einen Vergleich gebraucht, der uns hervorgehen kann aus dem Geiste der Geisteswissenschaft und uns sozusagen über das, was bei dieser Frage möglich oder unmöglich ist, aufklären kann. Wir haben gesagt, wenn jemand irgendwo hinreisen wollte und man ihm zunächst an seinem Orte nur sagen könnte, wie er den Weg einzuschlagen habe nach einem viel näheren Orte, ihn aber mit der Gewißheit entlassen würde, daß man ihm an diesem Orte weiterhelfen würde, so könnte er, wenn er auch streckenweise sich durchfragt, zwar nicht wissen, wie der Weg zu dem letzten Ziele ist, aber doch sicher sein, daß er an sein letztes Ziel ankommen wird, weil er immer von Ort zu Ort weiterkommen kann. So fragen wir als Schüler der Geisteswissenschaft nicht nach den «letzten Zielen », sondern nach den nächsten, das heißt nach dem Erdenziel, und wissen, daß es gar keinen rechten Sinn hätte, nach den letzten Zielen zu fragen. Denn wir haben erkannt, daß es sich im Menschenleben um Entwickelung handelt. So daß wir uns klar sein müssen, daß wir im jetzigen Zeitpunkte unserer Entwickelung überhaupt nichts verstehen könnten von den späteren Entwickelungszielen und daß wir uns erst zu einem höheren Standpunkte entwickeln müßten, um ein Verständnis für das zu gewinnen, was mit einem späteren Ziele gemeint ist. Wir fragen also nach dem nächsten Ziele und sind uns klar, daß - indem wir uns gerade dieses nächste Ziel als ein Ideal vorhalten, es erstreben und, wenn wir die rechten Mittel gebrauchen, es auch erreichen werden wir dadurch zu einem weiteren Punkte unserer Entwickelung kommen, so daß wir an diesem Punkte wieder die rechte Frage nach dem nächsten Ziele stellen können und so fort. Während es also scheinen könnte, daß durch Geisteswissenschaft der Mensch unbescheiden gemacht würde, weil er über die gewöhnliche Welt hinaussieht in eine geistige Welt hinein, wird er gegenüber dem, was man oft leichthin an den Fragen über allerhöchste Dinge aufwirft, im Gegenteil gerade über diese allerhöchsten Dinge bescheiden gemacht.
Nach dem Erdenziel zunächst fragen wir uns. Mit andern Worten: Wir fragen uns, was der Mensch durch die Entwickelungsperiode, wo er durch jene physischen Verkörperungen durchgeht, die wir die physischen Verkörperungen im Fleische auf der Erde nennen, vorzugsweise hinzuträgt zu dem, was in den vorhergehenden Entwickelungsperioden gewonnen ist, in der Saturn-, Sonnen- und Mondenzeit? -— Um dies ins Auge zu fassen, wollen wir uns Dinge vor die Seele führen, welche wir von dieser oder jener Seite her schon kennen, die uns heute aber dazu dienen sollen, recht konkrete, recht bestimmte Begriffe mit dem zu verbinden, was man den Sinn der Erdenentwickelung nennen könnte. Da sei zunächst auf etwas aufmerksam gemacht, worauf in anderem Zusammenhange schon hingewiesen ist.
Als in der Zeit, in welcher innerhalb der griechisch-lateinischen Kulturperiode — man könnte fast genau sagen: im 6. Jahrhundert vor unserer Zeitrechnung — das gegenwärtige vernunftgemäße, verstandesgemäße Denken der Menschheit begann, da wurde ein Gedanke oft und oft geäußert: der Gedanke, daß alle Philosophie, alles tiefere Nachdenken über die Geheimnisse des Daseins ausgehe von dem, was man Verwunderung oder Erstaunen nennen kann. Das heißt mit andern Worten: So lange der Mensch über die Dinge, die ihn umgeben, über die Erscheinungen, innerhalb welcher er lebt, keine Verwunderung, kein Erstaunen hegen kann, so lange lebt er gedankenlos hin und fragt nicht in einer vernunft- oder geistgemäßen Art nach dem, «warum» die Dinge so oder so verlaufen. «Von der Verwunderung oder dem Erstaunen geht alles Philosophieren aus.» — Das war ein immer wiederkehrender Spruch in der alten griechisch-lateinischen Kulturperiode. Was bedeutet denn eigentlich für das menschliche Seelenleben dieser Spruch?
Wenn ein Mensch noch niemals eine Lokomotive fahren gesehen hat - es ist ja heute innerhalb der europäischen Kultur schon schwer, einen solchen Menschen aufzufinden, aber es ist noch gar nicht lange her, da konnte man noch solche Menschen finden; jetzt muß man dazu schon nach recht entfernten Gegenden gehen -, so wird er, wenn er eine Eisenbahn fahren sieht, sich verwundern, wird sich namentlich darüber wundern, daß sich da etwas vorwärts bewegt und gar nicht diejenigen Kräfte zum Vorwärtsbewegen hat, die er zu sehen gewohnt ist, wenn ein Vorwärtsbewegen in Betracht kommt. Es ist ja bekannt, daß viele solche Menschen, die erstaunt waren, wenn sie da eine Lokomotive haben fahren gesehen, gefragt haben, ob da die Pferde im Innern wären, welche die Lokomotive vorwärts bewegten? — Warum waren die Leute erstaunt, verwundert über das, was sich ihnen darbot? Sie waren deshalb erstaunt, weil sie etwas gesehen haben, was ihnen in gewissem Sinne bekannt war und doch wieder unbekannt vorkam. Bekannt war ihnen, daß sich etwas vorwärts bewegt. Aber alles, was sich vorwärts bewegt, hatten sie mit ganz anderen Kräften ausgestattet gesehen. Jetzt zeigte sich ihnen ein Vorwärtsbewegen, wie es sich ihnen vorher niemals gezeigt hat. Das ruft die Verwunderung hervor.
Wenn nun die Philosophen der griechisch-lateinischen Kulturzeit erst dadurch Philosophen sein konnten, daß sie sich verwundern konnten, so müßten sie solche Menschen gewesen sein, die alles, was in der Welt vorgeht, zugleich als ein Bekanntes und als ein Unbekanntes empfanden, indem nämlich das, was geschieht, ihnen so dünkte, daß es nicht auf die Art geschehen konnte, wie es geschah, daß etwas gesucht werden müßte in alledem, was da um sie herum vorgeht, was ihnen unbekannt war.
Woher kommt es denn, daß sich sozusagen die Philosophen gegenüber allen Dingen so stellen mußten, als ob sie ihnen gänzlich unbekannt wären in bezug auf gewisse Kräfte oder Ursachen, die in ihnen walten? Da man nun annehmen muß, daß die Philosophen mindestens auch so gescheit sind wie die Leute, die sich gar nicht um ihre Umgebung kümmern, so kann man nicht voraussetzen, daß die Philosophen nur das, was man mit den gewöhnlichen Sinnen wahrnimmt, in den Dingen annehmen können. Sie müssen also etwas anderes in den Dingen vermissen oder ahnen, was sie in Verwunderung setzt: das heißt etwas, was nicht innerhalb der Sinneswelt ist. Daher haben auch die Philosophen zu dem, was in der Sinneswelt ist, immer ein Übersinnliches gesucht, solange es keinen Materialismus gegeben hat. Also darf man sagen, die Verwunderung, das Erstaunen der Philosophen muß sich eigentlich darauf beziehen, daß sie gewisse Dinge nicht mit dem begreifen können, was sie mit den sinnlichen Augen sehen, sondern daß sie sich sagen müssen: Was ich da sehe, das entspricht nicht dem, was ich mir davon vorstelle; ich muß mir übersinnliche Kräfte darin vorstellen. - Aber in der Sinneswelt sehen die Philosophen keine übersinnlichen Kräfte. Das allein würde für einen denkenden Menschen schon hinreichen, sich klarzumachen, daß eine, wenn auch nicht ins Bewußtsein hereinreichende, aber unterbewußte Erinnerung im Menschen ist seit den Zeiten, in denen die Seele etwas anderes gesehen hat als die Sinnesdinge. Das heißt, die Seele erinnert sich an Dinge, die sie durchgemacht hat, bevor sie in das Sinnesdasein eingetreten ist, und sagt sich daher: Ich bin verwundert, daß ich da Dinge sehe, die mich in ihren Wirkungen nur erstaunen und die anders sind als alles, was ich früher gesehen habe, die also erklärt werden müssen mit Kräften, die ich erst heraufholen muß aus der Welt des Übersinnlichen. - Deshalb also beginnt alles Philosophieren mit dem Erstaunen oder der Verwunderung, weil der Mensch in der Tat an die Dinge so herantritt, daß er, bevor er in die Sinneswelt eingetreten ist, aus einer übersinnlichen Welt kommt und nun die Sinnesdinge nicht dem entsprechen, was er in der übersinnlichen Welt wahrgenommen hat. Daher verwundert er sich, verwundert sich, weil die Dinge Wirkungen zeigen, die er nicht aus der übersinnlichen Welt kennt.
So weist uns die Verwunderung oder das Erstaunen auf den Zusammenhang des Menschen mit der übersinnlichen Welt hin als auf etwas, was einer Sphäre angehört, die der Mensch nur betreten kann, wenn er aus seiner Welt, in die er durch den physischen Leib eingeschlossen ist, hinauskommt. Das ist eines, was uns hier auf dieser Welt zeigt, daß der Mensch fortwährend eigentlich den Drang hat, über sich hinauszukommen. Wer nur in sich selber bleiben kann, wen die Verwunderung nicht hinaustreibt aus dem gewöhnlichen Ich, der bleibt ein Mensch, der nicht über sich hinauskommen kann, der die Sonne auf- und untergehen läßt und so weiter, ohne sich sonst um etwas zu kümmern. Das tun die unkultivierten Völker.
Ein Zweites, das den Menschen loslöst aus der gewöhnlichen Welt, das ihn hier schon aus einer bloß sinnlichen in eine übersinnliche Anschauung bringt, ist das Mitleid oder Mitgefühl. Ich habe das auch schon hervorgehoben. Das Mitleid erscheint dem, der gedankenlos durch die Welt geht, nicht als ein großes Geheimnis oder ein besonderes Mysterium. Dem aber, der denkend durch die Welt geht, erscheint gerade das Mitgefühl als ein Wunder, als ein großes Mystetium. Wenn wir ein Wesen nur von außen anschauen, bietet es unseren Sinnen und unserem Verstande das dar, was von den Eindrücken herrührt, die von ihm kommen. Wenn wir aber Mitgefühl entwickeln, treten wir über die Sphäre der Eindrücke, die das Wesen auf uns macht, hinüber; dann leben wir mit, was in dem geheimsten Allerheiligsten in den Wesen vorgeht, leben uns hinüber von unserer IchSphäre in die Sphäre des andern Wesens. Das heißt, wir kommen von uns los, wir gehen von dem, daß wir für gewöhnlich im physischen Leibe eingeschlossen sind, hinweg und kommen in das hinüber, was das andere Wesen in sich schließt und was in dieser Welt schon ein Übersinnliches ist, denn wir können nicht mit unseren Sinnen oder unserem Verstande in die Seelensphäre des andern Wesens hinüberkommen. Mitgefühl, daß es da ist in der Welt, ist ein Beweis dafür, daß wir schon innerhalb der Sinneswelt von uns loskommen, aus uns heraustreten und in andere Wesen hinübergehen können. Wir wissen, daß es ein sittlicher Defekt, ein sittlicher Mangel des Menschen ist, wenn er nicht Mitgefühl entwickeln kann. Wenn er sozusagen in dem Augenblick, wo er von sich loskommen sollte und in das andere Wesen hinübertreten sollte, um nicht seinen Schmerz, seine Freude, sondern den Schmerz und die Freude des andern Wesens mitzuerleben, wenn er in dem Moment zu fühlen aufhört, gleichsam ohnmächtig wird, dann ist das ein sittlicher Mangel. Der vollständige Erdenmensch muß durch das Mitgefühl mit andern Wesen über sein Erdenleben hinaustreten können, muß mitleben können, was nicht er ist, sondern was ein anderes Wesen ist.
Auf ein Drittes, wodurch der Mensch über das, was er zunächst im physischen Leibe ist, hinauskommt, haben wir auch schon aufmerksam gemacht. Es ist das Gewissen. Im gewöhnlichen Leben wird der Mensch dieses oder jenes begehren, was seinen Trieben oder Bedürfnissen entspricht, wird dem nachgehen, was ihm sympathisch ist, wird das von sich wegstoßen, was ihm antipathisch ist. Wenn der Mensch so handelt, wird er gar manches tun, wovon er sich dann selber eine Kritik abringt, indem sein Gewissen, die Stimme des Gewissens über ihn kommt, ihn sozusagen korrigiert. Von dieser Stimme des Gewissens hängt es auch ab, je nachdem sie so oder so spricht, ob der Mensch letzten Endes zufrieden sein darf mit dem, was er tut, oder nicht damit zufrieden sein darf. Damit aber ist bezeugt, daß der Mensch in dem Gewissen wieder etwas hat, wodurch er über die Sphäre dessen, was er in seinen Trieben und so weiter als sympathisch oder antipathisch empfindet, hinausgeht.
Erstaunen und Verwunderung, Mitleid oder Mitgefühl und das Gewissen sind die drei Dinge, durch welche der Mensch schon im physischen Leben über sich hinausgeht, durch die in dieses physische Leben Dinge hereinleuchten, die nicht auf dem Wege des Verstandes und der Sinne in diese menschliche Seele hereinkommen können.
Nun muß es leicht begreiflich sein, daß alle diese drei Kräfte nur möglich sind, sich nur ausbilden können, wenn der Mensch durch die Inkarnationen im fleischlichen Leibe durchgeht, wenn ihn ein fleischlicher Leib abtrennt sozusagen von dem, was da aus einer andern Sphäre in seine Seelensphäre hereintritt. Würde nicht ein fleischlicher Leib den Menschen von der geistigen Welt abtrennen und ihm die Außenwelt als eine sinnliche Welt darbieten, so würde er nicht erstaunen können. Der sinnliche Leib ist es durchaus, wodurch es kommt, daß der Mensch über die Sinnesdinge erstaunen kann und den Geist zu den Dingen hinzusuchen muß. Wenn der Mensch nicht von den andern abgetrennt wäre, sondern wenn die Menschen als eine gemeinsame Einheit leben würden, so daß sich ein gemeinsames Geistiges durch das Bewußtsein eines jeden hindurchziehen würde, wenn nicht jede Seele in einem physischen Leibe wäre, der sozusagen eine undurchdringliche Hülle für sie aufbaut und sie abtrennt von den andern, so könnten wir auch nicht das entwickeln, was wir Mitgefühl nennen. Und wenn dieser sinnliche Leib des Menschen nicht dazu veranlagt wäre, Dinge zu suchen, die nur von der sinnlichen Welt bedingt sind und durch etwas anderes in ihm korrigiert werden können, so würde nicht das Gewissen als eine geistige Kraft, die hereinspricht in seine Welt der Triebe, Leidenschaften und Begehrungen, empfunden werden können. So muß der Mensch im physischen Leibe verkörpert sein, damit er diese drei Dinge — Erstaunen oder Verwunderung, Mitgefühl und Gewissen — erleben kann.
In unserer Zeit kümmert man sich wenig um solche Geheimnisse, die aber tief bedeutsam die Welt des Daseins aufklären. Aber es ist im Grunde genommen noch nicht so lange her, da haben sich die Menschen sehr wohl um solche Geheimnisse gekümmert. Sie brauchen sich nur eines klarzumachen. Versuchen Sie sich einmal zurechtzufinden zum Beispiel in der Welt der griechischen Götter, jener Götter, von denen Homer erzählt. Versuchen Sie einmal alles das auf Ihre Seele wirken zu lassen, was diese griechischen Götter handelnd vollziehen. Oder versuchen Sie sich klarzumachen, was die Impulse sind bei einem Wesen, das noch wie ein letzter Rest einer früheren Erdengeneration dasteht, bei Achilles, der ja auch von einer göttlichen Mutter abstammt. Gehen Sie durch die Ilias und Odyssee, fragen Sie Homer, ob in diesen zwischen Menschen und Göttern drinnenstehenden Wesen je sich so etwas regte, was man Gewissen oder Mitleid nennen könnte? Denken Sie nur einmal, daß Homer seine ganze Ilias noch darauf aufbaut, daß eigentlich da wütet und wüstet der «Zorn des Achill». Das heißt, eine Leidenschaft, eine eminente Leidenschaft ist es, und Sie müssen alles abziehen, was sonst in der griechischen Sage steht: die Ilias handelt von nichts anderem, als von den Ereignissen, die eingetreten sind durch den Zorn des Achill, das heißt durch eine Leidenschaft. Sehen Sie auf alles, was Achill im Laufe der Darstellung vollbringt und versuchen Sie, ob Sie nur einmal sagen können, bei Achill regt sich so etwas wie Mitleid oder Gewissen. Aber das regt sich auch nicht einmal, was man Erstaunen oder Verwunderung nennen kann. Das ist gerade die Größe des Homer, daß er solche Dinge in einer so bewundernswürdigen Weise darstellt. Verfolgen Sie in der Ilias, welche Miene Achill macht, wenn man ihm erzählt, dieses oder jenes Furchtbare ist geschehen. Er verhält sich ganz anders als ein Mensch, der erstaunt oder verwundert ist. Und nehmen Sie dann die griechischen Götter selber: sie entwickeln alle möglichen Triebe, von denen Sie sagen können, daß sie einen entschieden egoistischen Charakter bei einem Menschen gewinnen, der im physischen Leibe eingeschlossen ist. Bei den Göttern sind sie geistig. Aber bei allem, was da innerhalb der griechischen Götterwelt vorgeführt wird, ist kein Mitleid, kein Gewissen, auch nicht das, was wir Erstaunen nennen können. Warum nicht? Weil Homer und die Griechen wußten: es handelt sich da um Wesen, die den früheren Zeiten angehören, die der Erdenzeit vorangegangen sind, wo die Wesen, die damals ihre Menschheitsentwickelung durchgemacht haben, je nach den planetarischen Zuständen, die vorher waren, noch nicht in ihre Seele Erstaunen, Mitleid und Gewissen aufgenommen haben. Diesen Zug muß man durchaus beachten, daß frühere planetarische Zustände, die unsere Erde durchgemacht hat und wo solche Wesen, wie sie die Griechen in ihren Göttern verehren, ihre Menschheitsstufen durchgemacht haben, durchaus nicht dazu da waren, um Erstaunen, Mitleid und Gewissen in der Scele anzupflanzen. Dazu ist die Erdenentwickelung da. Das ist der Sinn der Erdenentwickelung, daß auf dem Boden der Erdenentwickelung eingepflanzt wird in die Gesamtentwickelung das, was ohne die Erdenentwickelung nicht da sein würde: Erstaunen, Verwunderung, Mitgefühl und Gewissen.
Erinnern Sie sich, wie ich Sie selbst darauf aufmerksam gemacht habe, wie sozusagen das Gewissen nachweislich in einer gewissen Zeit des Griechentums entstanden ist: wie wir noch zeigen können, daß bei Äschylos das, was wir Gewissen nennen, gar keine Rolle spielt, daß bei ihm noch die Erinnerungen an die rächenden Furien vorhanden sind und daß dann erst bei Euripides das klar herausgearbeitet ist, was wir Gewissen nennen. Es entsteht der Begriff des Gewissens erst nach und nach in der griechisch-lateinischen Kulturepoche. Von dem Begriff der Verwunderung oder des Erstaunens habe ich Ihnen heute sagen können, daß er sich erst in der Zeit entwickelt, als man anfängt zu philosophieren im Stile der griechisch-lateinischen Zeit. Und wenn wit eine merkwürdige Tatsache der geistigen Erdenentwickelung betrachten, so wirft diese Tatsache ein weithin bedeutsames Licht auf das, was man Mitleid, Mitgefühl, was man im echten Sinne auch Liebe nennen kann. In unserer heutigen materialistischen Zeit ist es sogar außerordentlich schwierig, gerade über diesen Begriff von Mitgefühl und Liebe die rechte Anschauung zu erhalten. Denn es werden ja viele von Ihnen wissen, wie gerade in unserer heutigen materialistischen Zeit dieser Begriff verschoben, karikiert wird, indem der Materialismus in unserer Zeit den Begriff der Liebe so nahe wie möglich heranrückt an den Begriff der Sexualität, mit dem er gar nichts zu tun hat. Das ist ein Punkt, wo unsere gegenwärtige Geisteskultur sogar nicht nur das Vernünftige verläßt, sondern das verläßt, was irgendwie überhaupt noch zulässig ist bei einem gesunden Denken. Hier kommt bereits die Entwickelung in unserer Zeit durch ihren Materialismus nicht nur in das Unvernünftige und Unlogische, sondern in das Schändliche hinein, wenn so nahe aneinandergerückt werden, was man Liebe nennen kann und was sich unter dem Begriffe der Sexualität verzeichnen läßt. Daß unter gewissen Umständen zu der Liebe zwischen Mann und Weib die Sexualität herantreten kann, begründet nicht, daß man diese beiden Begriffe so nahe als möglich aneinander heranbringt: das Umfassende der Liebe und des Mitgefühles und das ganz Spezifische der Sexualität. Und logisch ist es ebenso gescheit, wenn man den Begriff, sagen wir der Lokomotive und des Menschenüberfahrens, weil manchmal Lokomotiven auch Menschen überfahren, als zwei zusammengehörige Begriffe betrachtet, wie man heute den Begriff der Liebe und den der Sexualität zusammenrückt, weil sich die Dinge unter gewissen Verhältnissen äußerlich beieinander finden. Aber das rührt nicht her von irgendeiner wissenschaftlichen Voraussetzung, sondern von der unsinnigen und sogar teilweise ganz ungesunden Denkweise unserer Zeit.
Dagegen ist eine andere Tatsache unendlich geeignet, uns hinzuweisen auf das Bedeutsame im Begriffe der Liebe und des Mitgefühles: nämlich jene merkwürdige Tatsache, daß sich in einem bestimmten Zeitpunkt, man möchte sagen, bis zu allen Völkern hin im Laufe der Menschheitsentwickelung etwas begibt, was in vielem Wesentlichen voneinander verschieden ist, in einem aber über die Erde hin gleich ist: in der Annahme des Liebesbegriffes, des Begriffes des Mitgefühles. Und da ist es wieder merkwürdig, daß fünf, sechs, sieben Jahrhunderte vor dem Eintritt des Christus-Impulses in die Menschheit über die ganze Erde hin Weltanschauungsstifter auftreten. Bei allen Völkern treten sie auf. Höchst bedeutsam ist es, wie man zusammen hat in China sowohl Lao-tse wie Konfuzius sechs Jahrhunderte vor unserer Zeitrechnung, in Indien den Buddha, in Persien den letzten Zarathustra — nicht den ursprünglichen -, in Griechenland Pythagoras. Wie verschieden sind diese Religionsstifter! Nur ein ganz abstrakter Sinn, der nicht auf die Unterschiede sehen kann, kann etwa so, wie das heute, aber nur durch einen Unfug vielfach geschieht, darauf aufmerksam machen, wie Lao-tse oder Konfuzius dasselbe enthalten wie andere Religionsstifter. Das ist nicht der Fall. Aber eines ist bei allen der Fall: sie enthalten alle in ihrer Lehre das Element, daß Mitgefühl oder Liebe regieren muß von Menschenseele zu Menschenseele! Das ist das Bedeutsame, daß da sechs Jahrhunderte vor unserer Zeitrechnung das Bewußtsein davon sich zu regen beginnt, wie jetzt in den fortgehenden Strom der Menschheitsentwickelung Liebe und Mitgefühl aufzunehmen sind.
So möchte man also sagen: Alles weist darauf hin, sowohl das Eintreten von Erstaunen oder Verwunderung, wie der Eintritt des Gewissens, wie auch das Eintreten von Liebe und Mitgefühl in den fortgehenden Strom der Menschheitsentwickelung, daß in der Zeit der vierten nachatlantischen Kulturepoche alle Zeichen geschehen, daß wirklich in die Menschheitsentwickelung das eingefügt werde, was wir nennen können den Sinn der Erdenentwickelung.
Wie unendlich oberflächlich, wie unendlich töricht ist es, wenn die Menschen zum Beispiel sagen: Warum mußte der Mensch erst hinuntersteigen aus den göttlich-geistigen Welten in die physische Welt, da er sich doch erst wieder hinaufentwickeln soll? Warum konnte er nicht droben bleiben? — Er konnte deshalb nicht droben bleiben, weil er die drei Kräfte der Verwunderung oder des Erstaunens, der Liebe oder des Mitgefühls und des Gewissens oder der sittlichen Forderung erst auf der Erde, durch das Heruntersteigen in die physische Erdenentwickelung in sich aufnehmen konnte. So müssen wir uns also sagen: Wir blicken hin auf den vierten nachatlantischen Kulturzeitraum und sehen während desselben in die Menschheit Impulse hereintreten, welche - eigentlich erst von da ab - in der Menschheit immer mehr und mehr überhandnehmen müssen. Es ist ja sehr leicht heute noch darauf hinzuweisen, wie wenig in der Menschheit schon Mitgefühl und Liebe, wie wenig das Gewissen herrscht. Gewiß, auf diese Dinge kann man heute noch hinweisen. Aber man muß, wenn man auf diese Dinge hindeutet, zugleich darauf aufmerksam machen, daß noch im griechisch-lateinischen Zeitalter in der Welt so und so viele anerkannte Sklaven waren, und daß sogar noch ein so großer Philosoph wie Aristoteles das Vorhandensein der Sklaven als in der Menschennatur notwendig begründet angesehen hat, und daß seit jener Zeit sich so weit die Liebe eingelebt hat, daß, wenn auch heute noch Ungleichheiten unter den Menschen bestehen, jetzt schon in den Menschenseelen gegenüber gewissen Dingen so etwas wie Schamgefühl vorhanden ist. Das heißt, gerade die Kräfte, die damals in die Menschheitsentwickelung eingetreten sind, sie entwickeln sich in den Seelen immer mehr und mehr. Heute wird sich keiner mehr getrauen, wenn er nicht etwa in einer einseitigen Weise das tragische Schicksal Nietzsches hat - von den Anhängern Nietzsches kann dabei ganz abgesehen werden, denn Nietzsche würde sie sich bei gesunden Sinnen abgeschüttelt haben -, sich ganz oflen auf den Standpunkt zu stellen, daß heute wieder, wie in Griechenland, die bewußte, ausgesprochene Sklaverei eingeführt würde. Und es wird keinerleugnen, daß das größte Gefühl in der Menschenseele das der Liebe und des Mitgefühles ist und daß es Aufgabe des Menschen sein muß, jene Stimme immer feiner und feiner zu machen, die wie aus einer andern Welt in die Seele hereintönt.
Nachdem wir uns das in die Seele geschrieben haben, daß es gleichsam der Sinn der Erdenentwickelung ist, die drei charakterisierten Kräfte zu entwickeln, blicken wir jetzt auf denjenigen Impuls hin, den wir so oft als den wichtigsten Impuls innerhalb der Erdenentwickelung angeführt haben, der eben in den vierten nachatlantischen Kulturzeitraum hineinfällt, auf den Christus-Impuls. Schon eine äußere Betrachtung zeigt uns, daß er gerade in jenes Zeitalter hineinfällt, in welchem die Erde reif ist, die drei Eigenschaften, die drei Kräfte: Erstaunen oder Verwunderung, Mitleid oder Liebe und Gewissen oder sittliche Forderung zu entwickeln, in welchem diese erst als so recht menschliche Eigenschaften auftreten. Wie haben wir den Christus-Impuls betrachtet?
Wir haben ihn in der Weise betrachtet, daß wir wissen, wie er eigentlich in die Menschheitsentwickelung hereingetreten ist. Ich möchte hier eine Anmerkung machen in bezug auf das, was ich über den Christus-Impuls gesagt habe, was ich gesagt habe über das Zurückbleiben eines Teiles gewisser spiritueller Kräfte wie ein Übermenschliches, als die Menschheit ihre Entwickelung hier auf der Erde anfing durchzumachen, und daß dieser Impuls in der Zeit eingeströmt ist, die wir bezeichnen können als angedeutet in der Bibel durch die Johannestaufe im Jordan. So daß dasjenige eingetreten ist, was nicht die luziferischen Kräfte aufgenommen hat, was gewartet hat bis zum vierten Kulturzeitraum, um sich dann mit der Menschheit zu vereinigen. Halten Sie das zusammen mit dem, was ich oft erwähnt habe: daß eigentlich, wenn man nicht auf diese Art aufmerksam machen kann auf die Dinge, die uns zeigen, wie die geistige Welt in die physische hereinspielt, es eine Unsitte ist, demgegenüber mit den alleräußerst abstrakten Begriffen zu kommen, wie zum Beispiel mit dem von den «drei Logoi». Oft habe ich betont, daß ein gewöhnlicher Mensch sich unter «Logoi» meistens nichts anderes vorstellen kann als nur die fünf Buchstaben. Wenn Sie trotzdem hören können, daß außerhalb unserer Bewegung gesagt wird, bei uns würde die Sache so dargestellt, daß der Christus der «zweite Logos» ist — wobei so vorgegangen wird, als ob das, was außerhalb unserer Bewegung gesagt wird, bei uns gesagt würde -, so können Sie daran ersehen, daß es notwendig ist, wohl ins Auge zu fassen, daß fortwährend heute die Entstellungen dessen, was hier vorgebracht wird, an der Tagesordnung sind. Während wir uns hier bemühen, immer wieder und wieder zu ergründen und zu erweitern und von allen Seiten zusammenzutragen, was den Christus-Begriff vertiefen kann, werden die Sachen außerhalb unseres Arbeitsfeldes so dargestellt, als ob man hier einen abstrakten Begriff hinpfahle und in einer äußerlichen Weise so reden könnte, daß der Christus der «zweite Logos » sei. Aber in der theosophischen Bewegung sollten die Gewissen so geschärft werden, daß man weiß, daß so etwas nicht geschehen dürfte. Solange es noch möglich ist, Dinge zu tun, die einfach die Meinung der andern entstellen, steht die theosophische Bewegung auf keinem besonders hohen sittlichen Niveau, und es nützt nichts zu sagen, daß es schön sei, daß alle möglichen Meinungen in der Theosophischen Gesellschaft vertreten werden können. Das bleibt eine Phrase, solange man sich erlaubt, auf irgendeinem andern Gebiete falsche Meinungen über das zu verbreiten, was irgendwo vertreten wird. Gewiß muß es gestattet sein, alle möglichen Meinungen zu verbreiten, aber nicht falsche Meinungen von den andern. Und notwendig ist es, daß in dieser Beziehung das spirituelle Gewissen geschärft wird, denn sonst wird endlich aus der theosophischen Bewegung alles Wahrheitsgefühl herausgetrieben, und dann werden wir nicht innerhalb der theosophischen Bewegung die notwendige spirituelle Bewegung fortführen können. Wir müssen die Dinge wirklich ernst ansehen und nicht oberflächlich darüber hinweggehen. Wir müssen uns darüber klar sein, daß allerdings weniger wird gedruckt werden können, wenn man nur das drucken will, was man sicher weiß. Aber was schadet es denn, wenn wirklich weniger gedruckt wird? Oder was schadet es, wenn weniger gesprochen wird, wenn nur das Wahre, das Wirkliche, das was ist, gesprochen wird? Man konnte in der letzten Zeit in den ausländischen Zeitschriften lesen, wie bei uns von dem Christus als dem «zweiten Logos» gesprochen wird, konnte lesen, wie hier eine theosophisch-christliche Richtung vertreten wird, die nur für Deutschland - für kein anderes Land — paßt. Man konnte lesen, wie hier eine engherzige Theosophie betrieben wird und wie von Leipzig aus, von einer Ihnen bekannten gewissen Richtung, eine «weitherzige» theosophische Bewegung betrieben wird. Wenn man so etwas liest, muß man sagen: Es ist in der theosophischen Bewegung nicht jene heilige Schärfung des Gewissens vorhanden, die notwendig ist für eine spirituelle Bewegung. Und wenn wir jene heilige Schärfung des Gewissens nicht haben, wenn wir uns nicht streng verpflichtet fühlen zur heiligsten Wahrheit, dann kommen wir auch auf keinem anderen Wege vorwärts!
Das mußte gesagt werden. Und es wird gerade innerhalb der theosophischen Bewegung notwendig sein, den Menschen gegenüber in bezug auf das, was immer als Liebe und Mitgefühl hingestellt wird, ein wenig auf die Finger zu schauen.
Wenn wir nun den Christus-Impuls so ins Auge fassen, daß wir in ihm das Herabströmen jenes geistigen Impulses sehen, der in der alten lemurischen Zeit zurückgeblieben ist, und der sich mit der Erdenentwickelung vereinigt hat in der vierten nachatlantischen Kulturepoche in dem Zeitpunkt, der durch die Johannestaufe im Jordan bezeichnet wird und der vollendet wird durch das Mysterium von Golgatha, dann haben wir in dem Christus-Impuls, wenn wir ihn so darstellen, etwas, von dem wir immer aussagen, daß das, was wir den Christus nennen, ja auch dazumal nicht in einem gewöhnlichen physischen Menschen verkörpert war. Wir wissen, wie kompliziert jener Jesus von Nazareth gestaltet war, um durch die drei Jahre seines Lebens hindurch den Christus-Impuls aufnehmen zu können. Daher sind wir uns klar, daß durch drei Jahre, umhüllt durch die drei Hüllen eines andern Menschen, der Christus-Impuls auf der Erde gelebt hat, sind uns aber auch klar, daß der Christus-Impuls auch dazumal nicht auf der Erde «verkörpert» war, sondern nur das Fleisch desjenigen durchdrang, ausfüllte, der als der Jesus von Nazareth dastand. Das müssen wir verstehen, wenn gesagt wird, daß von einer Wiederkehr des Christus nicht die Rede sein kann, sondern nur von einem einmaligen Impuls während der Zeit der palästinensischen Ereignisse, als von dem Jesus von Nazareth bei der Johannestaufe nur geblieben waren dessen physischer Leib, Ätherleib und Astralleib, und diese ausgefüllt wurden von dem Christus-Impuls, der in ihnen gleichsam drei Jahre auf der Erde herumgewandelt hat. Seit jener Zeit wissen wir, ist der Christus mit der geistigen Erdenatmosphäre verbunden und kann dort gefunden werden von denen, die ihn aufnehmen wollen. Er ist seit jener Zeit in der geistigen Erdenatmosphäre vorhanden und war vorher nicht da. Das ist der wichtige Einschnitt in der Erdenentwickelung, daß die Erde von dieser Zeit ab etwas enthält, was sie vorher nicht in sich enthalten hat.
Nun wissen wir aber noch, daß wir, wenn wir um uns herumschauen, die verschiedenen Reiche der Natur sehen, daß aber die Art, wie wir dieselben ansehen, nichts Wirkliches ist, sondern daß es die Maja ist, die große Illusion. Schauen wir in das Reich der Tiere, so haben wir die einzelnen Gestalten entstehend und vergehend und sehen als bleibend höchstens die Gruppenseele an. Schauen wir auf die Pflanzen, so sehen wir ebenfalls die einzelnen Pflanzen entstehen und vergehen, aber hinter ihnen sehen wir den Erdengeist, den wir als etwas Bleibendes dargestellt haben. Und ähnlich ist es bei den Mineralien. So sehen wir das Geistige als etwas Bleibendes, aber das Physische - gleichgültig ob beim Tier-, Pflanzen- oder Mineralreich können wir nicht als bleibend ansehen. Ja, wenn wir den Erdenprozeß mit den äußeren Sinnen verfolgen, so sehen wir, wie sich der Erdenplanet nach und nach pulverisiert und sich einst als Erdenstaub auflösen wird. Wir haben es charakterisiert, was sein wird, wenn der Erdenleib von dem Geiste der Erde abgeworfen wird, wie der einzelne Menschenleib von dem Menschengeist abgeworfen wird. Was wird bleiben als höchste Substanz der Erde, wenn die Erde an ihrem Ziele angekommen sein wird? Der Christus-Impuls war auf der Erde da, war gleichsam als geistige Substanz vorhanden. Der bleibt. Der wird von den Menschen während der Erdenentwickelung aufgenommen. Aber wie lebt er weiter? Als er auf der Erde während der drei Jahre wandelte, hatte er nicht physischen Leib, Ätherleib und Astralleib für sich, er hatte die drei Hüllen angenommen von dem Jesus von Nazareth. Aber indem die Erde an ihrem Ziele angelangt sein wird, wird sie, wie die menschliche Wesenheit, eine voll ausgebildete Wesenheit sein, die dem Christus-Impuls entspricht. Aber woher nimmt der Christus-Impuls diese drei Hüllen? Aus dem, was nur aus der Erde genommen werden kann. Was sich in der Menschheitsentwickelung, die mit dem Mysterium von Golgatha begonnen hat, auf der Erde auslebt seit dem vierten nachatlantischen Kulturzeitraum an Erstaunen oder Verwunderung über die Dinge, alles was in uns leben kann als Erstaunen und Verwunderung, das geht endlich an den Christus heran und bildet mit den Astralleib des Christus-Impulses. Und alles, was in den Menschenseelen Platz greift als Liebe und Mitleid, das bildet den ätherischen Leib des Christus-Impulses, und was als Gewissen in den Menschen lebt und sie beseelt, von dem Mysterium von Golgatha bis zum Erdenziele hin, das formt den physischen Leib oder das, was ihm entspricht, für den Christus-Impuls.
So bekommt ein Ausspruch des Evangeliums erst seine wahre Bedeutung: «Was ihr getan habt einem unter diesen meinen geringsten Brüdern, das habt ihr mir getan!» Da haben wir charakterisiert, wie das, was von Mensch zu Mensch geschieht, der Christus als die aufeinanderfolgenden einzelnen Atome seines eigenen Ätherleibes empfindet: was an Liebe und Mitleid entwickelt wird, formt sich ein dem ätherischen Leibe des Christus. So wird er am Ziele der Erdenentwikkelung in dreifacher Weise umhüllt sein von dem, was in den Menschen gelebt hat und was, wenn sie über ihr Ich hinausgekommen sind, die Hülle des Christus geworden sein wird.
Nun merken Sie, wie sich die Menschen mit dem Christus zusarmmenleben.Von dem Mysterium von Golgatha bis zum Ziele der Erdenentwickelung werden die Menschen immer vollkommener und vollkommener werden, indem sie sich hinentwickeln zu dem, was in ihnen bestehen kann, indem sie eine Ich-Wesenheit sind. Aber die Menschen werden verbunden mit der Christus-Wesenheit, die unter sie getreten ist, indem sie fortwährend aus sich herausgehen und durch Verwundetung und Erstaunen den astralischen Leib des Christus begründen. Der Christus baut sich nicht den eigenen astralischen Leib, sondern in dem, was die Menschen in sich finden als Erstaunen oder Verwunderung, werden sie beitragen zu dem astralischen Leib des Christus. Sein ätherischer Leib wird gebaut werden durch Mitgefühl und Liebe, welche von Mensch zu Mensch walten werden, und sein physischer Leib durch das, was als Gewissen sich in den Menschen heranbilden wird. Was der Mensch auf diesen drei Gebieten sündigt, das entzieht zugleich dem Christus auf der Erde die Möglichkeit, sich voll zu entwickeln, das heißt, es läßt die Erdenentwickelung mangelhaft. Die Menschen, die gleichgültig über die Erde gehen, die sich nicht bekanntmachen wollen mit dem, was sich ihnen auf der Erde enthüllen kann, entziehen durch ihre Gleichgültigkeit dem astralischen Leib des Christus die Möglichkeit seiner vollständigen Entwickelung, die Menschen, welche mitleidlos, ohne Liebe zu entfalten dahinleben, verhindern dem Ätherleibe des Christus, daß er sich voll entwickeln kann, und die, welche gewissenlos sind, verhindern dasselbe für seinen physischen Leib; das heißt aber, daß die Erde überhaupt nicht an das Ziel ihrer Entwickelung kommen kann.
So müssen wir das Überwinden des egoistischen Prinzips in der Erdenentwickelung in Betracht ziehen. Daher wird der ChristusImpuls sich immer weiter und weiter in der Menschenkultur einleben, und das, was im letzten Vortrage hier gezeigt worden ist, indem aufmerksam gemacht worden ist, wie zum Beispiel in Raffaels Bildern sich der Christus-Impuls in einer interkonfessionellen Weise in die Menschheit eingelebt hat, das wird seine Fortsetzung erfahren. Ja, auch die äußere bildhafte Darstellung des Christus, wie er äußerlich bildhaft vorgestellt werden soll, ist eine Frage, die erst noch gelöst werden soll. Es werden viele Gefühle durch die Menschenseelen auf der Erde gehen müssen, wenn zu den vielen Versuchen, die im Laufe der Epochen gemacht worden sind, derjenige kommen soll, der einigermaßen zeigen wird, was der Christus ist als der übersinnliche Impuls, der sich in die Erdenentwickelung hineinlebt. Zu einer solchen Christus-Darstellung sind in den bisherigen Versuchen nicht einmal die Ansätze vorhanden. Denn es müßte das hervortreten, was die werdende Äußerlichkeit darstellt des Herum-sich-Gliederns der Impulse des Erstaunens, des Mitgefühles und des Gewissens. Was sich darin ausdrückt, muß sich so ausdrücken, daß das Christus- Antlitz so lebendig wird, daß dasjenige, was den Menschen zum Erdenmenschen macht, das Sinnlich-Begierdenhafte, überwunden wird durch das, was das Antlitz vergeistigt, verspiritualisiert. Es muß höchste Kraft in dem Antlitz sein dadurch, daß alles, was als höchste Entfaltung des Gewissens zu denken ist, sich in dem eigentümlich geformten Kinn und Mund zeigt, wenn er vor einem steht, wenn ihn der Maler oder der Bildhauer formen wird, ein Mund, an dem man fühlen kann, daß er nicht zum Essen da ist, sondern dazu, um auszusprechen, was als Sittlichkeit und Gewissen in der Menschheit jemals gepflegt worden ist, und daß dazu das ganze Knochensystem, sein Zahnsystem und Unterkiefer als Mund geformt ist. Das wird zum Ausdruck kommen in einem solchen Antlitz. Mit dieser Unterform des Gesichtes wird eine solche Kraft verbunden sein, die ausstrahlt, zerstückelt und zerpflückt den ganzen übrigen menschlichen Leib, daß dieser zu einer anderen Gestalt wird, wodurch andere gewisse Kräfte überwunden werden, so daß es unmöglich sein wird, dem Christus, der einen solchen Mund zeigen wird, irgendwie eine Leibesform zu geben, wie sie der heutige physische Mensch hat. Dagegen wird man ihm Augen geben, aus denen alle Gewalt des Mitgefühls sprechen wird, mit der nur Augen Wesen ansehen können — nicht um Eindrücke zu empfangen, sondern um mit der ganzen Seele in ihre Freuden und Leiden überzugehen. Und eine Stirn wird er haben, wo man nicht vermuten kann, daß die Sinneseindrücke der Erde gedacht werden, sondern eine Stirn, die etwas vorn über den Augen vorstehen wird, sich wölben wird über jenem Gehirnteil: aber nicht eine «Denkerstirn », die wieder verarbeitet, was da ist, sondern es wird sich Verwunderung aussprechen aus der Stirn, die über die Augen hervortritt und sanft sich wölbt nach rückwärts über den Kopf, dadurch ausdrückend, was man Verwunderung über die Mysterien der Welt nennen kann. Das wird ein Kopf sein müssen, den der Mensch nicht in der physischen Menschheit antreffen kann.
Jenes Nachbild des Christus müßte eigentlich etwas sein wie das Ideal der Christus-Gestalt. Und das ist das Gefühl, das diesem Ideal zustrebt, wenn man es in der Entwickelung anstreben wird: immer mehr und mehr muß für die Menschheitsentwickelung, insofern sich die Menschheit künstlerisch betätigen wird in der Darstellung des höchsten Ideals durch die spirituelle Wissenschaft, das Gefühl entstehen: Du darfst nicht hinschauen auf etwas, was da ist, wenn du den Christus bilden willst, sondern du mußt in dir kraften und wirken lassen und dich innerlich durchdringen mit alledem, was eine geistige Versenkung in den geistigen Werdegang der Welt durch die drei wichtigen Impulse: Erstaunen, Mitgefühl und Gewissen hindurch, dir geben kann.
Sixth Lecture
You know that a frequently repeated question in life and also in philosophy is that of the so-called meaning of all existence. Now, in the course of time, through our spiritual scientific work, we have acquired a certain modesty, especially in relation to this question. We know that through the exploration of the spiritual worlds, human beings can see or think beyond the ordinary sensory world; but we also know that we cannot presume to speak in any way about the ultimate origins or the ultimate and highest meaning of life. Superficial thinking will certainly object: What do we know at all if we cannot know anything about the meaning of life?
We have often used a comparison that arises from the spirit of spiritual science and can, so to speak, enlighten us about what is possible or impossible in this question. We have said that if someone wanted to travel somewhere and was initially told only how to get to a place much closer, but was assured that he would be helped further at that place, then even if he asked for directions along the way, he would not know how to get to his final destination, but he would be sure that he would reach his final destination because he could always get from place to place. As students of spiritual science, we do not ask about the “final destinations,” but about the next ones, that is, about the earthly goal, and we know that it would make no sense at all to ask about the final destinations. For we have recognized that human life is a matter of development. So we must be clear that at the present stage of our development we cannot understand anything at all about later goals of development, and that we must first develop to a higher level in order to gain an understanding of what is meant by a later goal. So we ask about the next goal and are clear that by setting this next goal as an ideal, striving for it, and, if we use the right means, achieving it, we will thereby reach a further point in our development, so that at this point we can again ask the right question about the next goal, and so on. So while it might seem that spiritual science makes people immodest because it allows them to look beyond the ordinary world into a spiritual world, on the contrary, it makes them modest about the very things that are often casually raised in questions about the highest things.
First, we ask ourselves about the goal of life on earth. In other words, we ask ourselves what human beings contribute during the period of development in which they pass through those physical embodiments that we call physical embodiments in the flesh on earth, to what was gained in the previous periods of development, in the Saturn, Sun, and Moon periods? — To grasp this, let us bring to mind things that we already know from this or that source, but which will now serve us to connect quite concrete, quite definite concepts with what might be called the meaning of Earth's evolution. Let us first draw attention to something that has already been mentioned in another connection.
At the time when, within the Greek-Latin cultural period — one could almost say precisely in the 6th century BC — the present rational, intellectual thinking of humanity began, a thought was often expressed: the idea that all philosophy, all deeper reflection on the mysteries of existence, proceeds from what we call wonder or amazement. In other words, as long as human beings are incapable of wonder or amazement at the things that surround them, at the phenomena within which they live, they live thoughtlessly and do not ask themselves in a rational or intellectual way “why” things are the way they are. “All philosophy springs from wonder or amazement.” This was a recurring saying in the ancient Greek and Latin cultural period. What does this saying actually mean for the human soul?
If a person has never seen a locomotive—it is difficult to find such a person in European culture today, but not so long ago when you could still find such people; now you have to go to quite remote areas to find them — when he sees a train running, he will be amazed, and he will be particularly surprised that something is moving forward without any of the forces he is accustomed to seeing when something moves forward. It is well known that many such people, who were astonished when they saw a locomotive running, asked whether there were horses inside that moved the locomotive forward. Why were people astonished, amazed at what they saw? They were astonished because they saw something that was familiar to them in a certain sense and yet seemed unfamiliar. They knew that something was moving forward. But they had always thought that everything that moved forward was powered by completely different forces. Now they saw movement forward in a way they had never seen before. This caused them to be amazed.
If the philosophers of the Greek-Latin cultural era could only be philosophers because they were capable of wonder, then they must have been people who perceived everything that happens in the world as both familiar and unfamiliar, in that what happens seemed to them that it could not happen in the way it did, that something must be sought in all that was going on around them that was unknown to them.
Why is it that philosophers had to approach all things as if they were completely unknown to them in terms of certain forces or causes at work within them? Since we must assume that philosophers are at least as intelligent as people who do not concern themselves with their surroundings, we cannot assume that philosophers can only accept what can be perceived by the ordinary senses. They must therefore miss or sense something else in things that amazes them: that is, something that is not within the sensory world. That is why philosophers have always sought something supernatural in addition to what is in the sensory world, as long as there has been no materialism. So we can say that the wonder, the astonishment of philosophers must actually refer to the fact that they cannot comprehend certain things with what they see with their sensory eyes, but that they must say to themselves: What I see there does not correspond to what I imagine it to be; I must imagine supernatural powers in it. But philosophers see no supernatural powers in the sensory world. That alone would be enough for a thinking person to realize that there is a memory in human beings, albeit not conscious but subconscious, from the time when the soul saw something other than the things of the senses. This means that the soul remembers things it experienced before it entered into sensory existence, and therefore says to itself: I am amazed that I see things whose effects astonish me and which are different from everything I have seen before, things that must therefore be explained by forces that I must first bring up from the supersensible world. That is why all philosophizing begins with astonishment or wonder, because human beings approach things in such a way that, before entering the sensory world, they come from a supersensible world and now find that sensory things do not correspond to what they perceived in the supersensible world. That is why he is astonished, amazed, because things show effects that he does not know from the supersensible world.
Thus, wonder or amazement points us to the connection between human beings and the supersensible world as something that belongs to a sphere which human beings can only enter when they leave the world in which they are enclosed by their physical bodies. This is one thing that shows us here in this world that human beings actually have a constant urge to transcend themselves. Those who can only remain within themselves, those whom wonder does not drive out of their ordinary ego, remain human beings who cannot transcend themselves, who let the sun rise and set and so on, without caring about anything else. This is what uncultured peoples do.
A second thing that detaches human beings from the ordinary world, that already brings them from a merely sensual to a supersensible perception, is compassion or empathy. I have already emphasized this. To those who go through life without thinking, compassion does not appear to be a great secret or a special mystery. But to those who go through life thinking, compassion appears to be a miracle, a great mystery. When we look at a being only from the outside, it presents to our senses and our intellect what comes from the impressions it makes on us. But when we develop compassion, we step beyond the sphere of impressions that the being makes on us; then we live with what is going on in the most secret inner sanctum of beings, we live our way out of our ego sphere into the sphere of the other being. This means that we detach ourselves from ourselves, we move away from the fact that we are usually enclosed in the physical body, and we pass over into what the other being contains within itself and what is already supersensible in this world, for we cannot pass over into the soul sphere of the other being with our senses or our intellect. Compassion, which exists in the world, is proof that we can already detach ourselves from within the sensory world, step out of ourselves, and pass over into other beings. We know that it is a moral defect, a moral deficiency in human beings, if they cannot develop compassion. If, at the moment when he should detach himself and pass over into the other being in order to experience not his own pain and joy but the pain and joy of the other being, if at that moment he ceases to feel, becomes powerless, so to speak, then that is a moral deficiency. The complete earthly human being must be able to transcend his earthly life through compassion for other beings; he must be able to experience what he is not, but what another being is.
We have already drawn attention to a third factor that enables human beings to transcend what they initially are in their physical bodies. This is conscience. In ordinary life, man desires this or that which corresponds to his instincts or needs, pursues what is pleasing to him, and rejects what is unpleasant to him. When man acts in this way, he does many things which he then criticizes himself, because his conscience, the voice of conscience, comes upon him and corrects him, so to speak. It also depends on this voice of conscience, depending on whether it speaks one way or another, whether people can ultimately be satisfied with what they do or not. But this proves that people have something in their conscience that enables them to go beyond the sphere of what they perceive as pleasant or unpleasant in their instincts and so on.
Amazement and wonder, compassion or sympathy, and conscience are the three things through which man already transcends himself in physical life, through which things shine into this physical life that cannot enter the human soul by means of the intellect and the senses.
Now it must be easy to understand that all these three forces are only possible, can only develop, when man passes through incarnations in the physical body, when a physical body separates him, so to speak, from what enters his soul sphere from another sphere. If a physical body did not separate man from the spiritual world and present the external world to him as a sensory world, he would not be able to marvel. It is entirely due to the sensory body that man is able to marvel at sensory things and must seek the spirit in them. If humans were not separated from one another, but if humans lived as a common unity, so that a common spirit would flow through the consciousness of each individual, if each soul were not in a physical body that builds up an impenetrable shell around it, so to speak, and separates it from the others, then we would not be able to develop what we call compassion. And if this sensual body of man were not predisposed to seek things that are conditioned only by the sensual world and can be corrected by something else within him, then conscience could not be perceived as a spiritual force that speaks into his world of instincts, passions, and desires. Thus, human beings must be embodied in the physical body in order to experience these three things—astonishment or wonder, compassion, and conscience.
In our time, little attention is paid to such mysteries, which nevertheless shed profound light on the world of existence. But it is not so long ago that people were very concerned with such mysteries. You only need to realize one thing. Try to find your way, for example, into the world of the Greek gods, the gods of whom Homer tells us. Try to let everything that these Greek gods do have an effect on your soul. Or try to understand what drives a being who stands there like the last remnant of an earlier generation of earthlings, Achilles, who is also descended from a divine mother. Go through the Iliad and the Odyssey and ask Homer whether these beings, who stand between humans and gods, ever felt anything that could be called conscience or compassion. Just think that Homer bases his entire Iliad on the fact that it is actually the “wrath of Achilles” that rages and ravages. That means it is a passion, an eminent passion, and you have to take away everything else that is in Greek mythology: the Iliad is about nothing else but the events that occurred because of the wrath of Achilles, that is, because of a passion. Look at everything Achilles accomplishes in the course of the narrative and try to say whether you can find even one instance of Achilles showing something like compassion or conscience. But not even what one might call astonishment or amazement arises. This is precisely the greatness of Homer, that he depicts such things in such an admirable way. Follow in the Iliad what expression Achilles makes when he is told that this or that terrible thing has happened. He behaves quite differently from a person who is astonished or amazed. And then take the Greek gods themselves: they develop all kinds of instincts that you could say would take on a decidedly selfish character in a human being confined to a physical body. In the gods, they are spiritual. But in everything that is presented in the Greek world of gods, there is no compassion, no conscience, not even what we might call astonishment. Why not? Because Homer and the Greeks knew that these were beings belonging to earlier times, preceding the Earth's time, when the beings who had undergone their human development at that time had not yet taken astonishment, compassion, and conscience into their souls, depending on the planetary conditions that had previously existed. It is important to note that the earlier planetary conditions that our Earth went through, and where beings such as those worshipped by the Greeks in their gods went through their stages of human development, were by no means intended to implant astonishment, compassion, and conscience in the soul. That is what the evolution of the Earth is for. That is the meaning of the evolution of the Earth, that what would not exist without the evolution of the Earth is planted in the overall evolution on the basis of the evolution of the Earth: astonishment, wonder, compassion, and conscience.
Remember how I myself drew your attention to how conscience demonstrably arose at a certain period of Greek civilization: how we can still show that in Aeschylus, what we call conscience plays no role at all, that in him the memories of the avenging Furies are still present, and that it is only in Euripides that what we call conscience is clearly elaborated. The concept of conscience only gradually emerged during the Greek-Latin cultural epoch. Today I was able to tell you that the concept of wonder or amazement only developed during the period when people began to philosophize in the style of the Greek-Latin era. And when we consider a remarkable fact of spiritual evolution on Earth, this fact sheds a far-reaching light on what we call compassion, empathy, and what we can also call love in the true sense. In our present materialistic age, it is extremely difficult to gain a correct view of this concept of compassion and love. For many of you will know how, especially in our present materialistic age, this concept is distorted and caricatured by materialism, which brings the concept of love as close as possible to the concept of sexuality, with which it has nothing to do. This is a point where our present intellectual culture not only abandons reason, but also abandons what is in any way permissible in healthy thinking. Here, the development of our age through its materialism is already entering not only into the unreasonable and illogical, but into the shameful, when what can be called love and what can be classified under the concept of sexuality are brought so close together. The fact that, under certain circumstances, sexuality can approach the love between a man and a woman does not justify bringing these two concepts as close together as possible: the comprehensiveness of love and compassion and the very specificity of sexuality. And it is just as logical to regard the concepts of, say, a locomotive and a person being run over as two related concepts, because locomotives sometimes run people over, as it is today to bring the concepts of love and sexuality closer together because under certain circumstances these things occur together externally. But this does not stem from any scientific premise, but from the nonsensical and even, in some cases, completely unhealthy way of thinking of our time.
In contrast, another fact is infinitely suited to pointing out to us the significance of the concepts of love and compassion: namely, the remarkable fact that at a certain point in time, one might say, something happens to all peoples in the course of human development that is in many essential respects different from one another, but in one respect is the same throughout the world: the acceptance of the concept of love, the concept of compassion. And it is remarkable that five, six, seven centuries before the Christ impulse entered humanity, world-view founders appeared all over the earth. They appeared among all peoples. It is highly significant that Lao Tzu and Confucius appeared together in China six centuries before our era, Buddha in India, the last Zarathustra (not the original one) in Persia, and Pythagoras in Greece. How different these founders of religions are! Only a completely abstract mind, unable to see the differences, can point out, as is often done today, but only through nonsense, that Lao Tzu or Confucius contain the same ideas as other religious founders. That is not the case. But one thing is true of all of them: they all contain in their teachings the element that compassion or love must reign from human soul to human soul! What is significant is that six centuries before our era, the consciousness of this began to stir, just as love and compassion are now being incorporated into the ongoing stream of human development.
So one might say: Everything points to the fact that, with the advent of astonishment or wonder, the emergence of conscience, and the emergence of love and compassion in the ongoing stream of human development, all signs are present in the fourth post-Atlantean cultural epoch that what we may call the meaning of Earth's development is truly being incorporated into human development.
How infinitely superficial, how infinitely foolish it is when people say, for example: Why did human beings first have to descend from the divine-spiritual worlds into the physical world, since they are supposed to evolve back up again? Why could he not remain above? — He could not remain above because he could only absorb the three forces of wonder or astonishment, love or compassion, and conscience or moral demand on earth, through his descent into physical earth evolution. So we must say to ourselves: We look at the fourth post-Atlantean cultural period and see impulses entering humanity during this period which — actually only from then on — must increasingly gain the upper hand in humanity. It is very easy today to point out how little compassion and love there already is in humanity, how little conscience prevails. Certainly, one can still point to these things today. But when pointing these things out, one must at the same time draw attention to the fact that even in the Greek-Latin age there were so many recognized slaves in the world, and that even a philosopher as great as Aristotle regarded the existence of slaves as necessary in human nature, and that since that time love has become so widespread that, even if inequalities among people still exist today, there is now already something like a sense of shame in people's souls toward certain things. This means that the very forces that entered into human development at that time are developing more and more in people's souls. Today, no one would dare, unless he had suffered the tragic fate of Nietzsche in some one-sided way — and we can leave aside Nietzsche's followers, for Nietzsche would have shaken them off if he had been in his right mind — to take the position that conscious, explicit slavery would be reintroduced today, as it was in Greece. And no one will deny that the greatest feeling in the human soul is that of love and compassion, and that it must be the task of human beings to make that voice, which sounds as if it comes from another world, ever finer and finer.
Having written this in our souls, that it is, as it were, the meaning of the Earth's development to develop the three forces characterized above, we now look at the impulse that we have so often cited as the most important impulse within the Earth's development, which falls precisely into the fourth post-Atlantean cultural period, the Christ impulse. Even an external observation shows us that it falls precisely into that age in which the earth is ripe to develop the three qualities, the three forces: astonishment or wonder, compassion or love, and conscience or moral demand, in which these first appear as truly human qualities. How have we viewed the Christ impulse?
We have considered it in such a way that we know how it actually entered into human evolution. I would like to make a comment here regarding what I have said about the Christ impulse, what I have said about the lagging behind of a part of certain spiritual forces as something superhuman when humanity began its development here on earth, and that this impulse flowed in during the period we can describe as indicated in the Bible by the baptism of John in the Jordan. So that what did not take up the Luciferic forces waited until the fourth cultural period to unite with humanity. Keep this in mind together with what I have often mentioned: that actually, if one cannot draw attention in this way to the things that show us how the spiritual world plays into the physical world, it is a bad habit to respond with extremely abstract concepts, such as that of the “three Logoi.” I have often emphasized that an ordinary person can usually imagine nothing else under “logoi” than just the five letters. If you nevertheless hear people outside our movement saying that we present the matter as if Christ were the “second Logos” — proceeding as if what is said outside our movement were said by us — then you can see that it is necessary to realize that distortions of what is presented here are constantly the order of the day. While we are striving here to explore and expand again and again and to gather from all sides what can deepen the concept of Christ, outside our field of work things are presented as if we were hammering home an abstract concept and speaking in an external way that Christ is the “second Logos.” But in the theosophical movement, consciences should be sharpened so that people know that such a thing should not happen. As long as it is still possible to do things that simply distort the opinions of others, the theosophical movement is not on a particularly high moral level, and it is useless to say that it is nice that all kinds of opinions can be represented in the Theosophical Society. That remains a phrase as long as one allows oneself to spread false opinions in any other field about what is represented elsewhere. Certainly, it must be permissible to spread all kinds of opinions, but not false opinions about others. And it is necessary that spiritual conscience be sharpened in this regard, for otherwise all sense of truth will eventually be driven out of the Theosophical Movement, and then we will not be able to continue the necessary spiritual movement within the Theosophical Movement. We must look at things seriously and not gloss over them superficially. We must be clear that less will be printed if we only want to print what we know for certain. But what harm is there in printing less? Or what harm is there in speaking less, if only the truth, the reality, what is, is spoken? Recently, one could read in foreign magazines how Christ is spoken of here as the “second Logos,” how a theosophical-Christian direction is represented here that is only suitable for Germany — for no other country. One could read how a narrow-minded theosophy is being practiced here and how, from Leipzig, from a certain direction known to you, a “broad-minded” theosophical movement is being carried out. When one reads such things, one must say: The theosophical movement lacks that sacred sharpening of conscience that is necessary for a spiritual movement. And if we do not have that sacred sharpening of conscience, if we do not feel strictly committed to the most sacred truth, then we will not make any progress in any other way!
That had to be said. And it will be necessary, especially within the theosophical movement, to keep a close eye on people with regard to what is always presented as love and compassion.
If we now consider the Christ impulse in such a way that we see in it the descent of that spiritual impulse which remained behind in the ancient Lemurian epoch and which united with the Earth's evolution in the fourth post-Atlantean cultural epoch at the time marked by the baptism of John in the Jordan and completed by the mystery of Golgotha, then we have in the Christ impulse, when we present it in this way, something of which we always say that what we call Christ was not embodied in an ordinary physical human being even then. We know how complex the Jesus of Nazareth was in order to be able to take in the Christ impulse during the three years of his life. Therefore, we are clear that the Christ impulse lived on earth for three years, enveloped by the three shells of another human being, but we are also clear that the Christ impulse was not “embodied” on earth at that time, but only permeated and filled the flesh of the one who stood there as Jesus of Nazareth. We must understand this when it is said that there can be no question of a return of Christ, but only of a unique impulse during the time of the events in Palestine, when all that remained of Jesus of Nazareth at the baptism of John was his physical body, etheric body, and astral body, and these were filled with the Christ impulse, which wandered on earth for three years, as it were. Since that time, we know that Christ is connected to the spiritual atmosphere of the earth and can be found there by those who want to receive him. He has been present in the spiritual atmosphere of the earth since that time and was not there before. This is the important turning point in the evolution of the earth, that from this time onward, the earth contains something that it did not contain before.
But we also know that when we look around us, we see the different realms of nature, but that the way we see them is not real, but rather Maya, the great illusion. When we look into the animal kingdom, we see individual forms coming into being and passing away, and at most we see the group soul as something permanent. If we look at plants, we also see individual plants coming into being and passing away, but behind them we see the earth spirit, which we have described as something permanent. And it is similar with minerals. Thus we see the spiritual as something permanent, but we cannot regard the physical—whether in the animal, plant, or mineral kingdom—as permanent. Yes, if we follow the earth process with our outer senses, we see how the earth planet gradually pulverizes and will one day dissolve into earth dust. We have characterized what will happen when the earth body is cast off by the spirit of the earth, just as the individual human body is cast off by the human spirit. What will remain as the highest substance of the earth when the earth has reached its goal? The Christ impulse was present on earth, existing as a spiritual substance, so to speak. That remains. It is taken up by human beings during the earth's evolution. But how does it live on? When he walked on earth during the three years, he did not have a physical body, etheric body, and astral body for himself; he had taken on the three sheaths of Jesus of Nazareth. But when the earth reaches its goal, it will be, like the human being, a fully developed being corresponding to the Christ impulse. But where does the Christ impulse take these three sheaths from? From what can only be taken from the earth. What has been living out on earth since the fourth post-Atlantean cultural period in the human evolution that began with the Mystery of Golgotha, in the form of astonishment or wonder at things, everything that can live within us as astonishment and wonder, finally approaches Christ and forms the astral body of the Christ impulse. And everything that takes hold in human souls as love and compassion forms the etheric body of the Christ impulse, and what lives in human beings as conscience and animates them, from the mystery of Golgotha to the goal of the earth, forms the physical body or what corresponds to it for the Christ impulse.
Thus a saying from the Gospel takes on its true meaning: “Whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me!” Here we have characterized how what happens from person to person is perceived by Christ as the successive individual atoms of his own etheric body: what is developed in love and compassion forms the etheric body of Christ. Thus, at the goal of earthly evolution, he will be enveloped in threefold form by what has lived in human beings and what, when they have transcended their egos, will have become the envelope of Christ.
Now notice how human beings live together with Christ. From the mystery of Golgotha to the goal of Earth's development, human beings will become more and more perfect by evolving toward what can exist within them, by being an I-being. But human beings become connected with the Christ being who has come among them by continually going out of themselves and, through wounding and wonder, forming the astral body of Christ. Christ does not build his own astral body, but in what human beings find within themselves as astonishment or wonder, they will contribute to the astral body of Christ. His etheric body will be built through compassion and love, which will prevail from human being to human being, and his physical body through what will develop in human beings as conscience. Whatever sins humans commit in these three areas simultaneously deprive Christ on Earth of the opportunity to develop fully, that is, they leave Earth's development incomplete. People who walk the Earth indifferently, who do not want to acquaint themselves with what can be revealed to them on Earth, deprive the astral body of Christ of the opportunity for its complete development through their indifference. People live their lives without compassion or love prevent the etheric body of Christ from developing fully, and those who are unscrupulous do the same to his physical body; this means, however, that the earth cannot reach the goal of its development at all.
Thus we must consider the overcoming of the egoistic principle in the development of the earth. Therefore, the Christ impulse will continue to take root in human culture, and what was shown in the last lecture, by pointing out how, for example, in Raphael's paintings the Christ impulse has taken root in humanity in an interdenominational way, will continue. Yes, even the external pictorial representation of Christ, how he should be presented externally in pictures, is a question that still needs to be resolved. Many feelings will have to pass through the souls of human beings on earth if, among the many attempts that have been made in the course of the epochs, there is to be one that will show to some extent what Christ is as the supersensible impulse that lives into the earth's evolution. In the attempts made so far, there are not even the beginnings of such a representation of Christ. For what must emerge is what represents the developing outward form of the structuring of the impulses of wonder, compassion, and conscience. What is expressed in this must be expressed in such a way that the Christ face becomes so alive that what makes human beings earthly human beings, the sensual and desire-driven, is overcome by what spiritualizes and spiritualizes the face. There must be supreme power in the face, in that everything that can be thought of as the highest development of conscience is revealed in the peculiarly shaped chin and mouth when he stands before you, when the painter or sculptor is shaping him, a mouth in which one can feel that it is not there for eating, but for expressing what has ever been cultivated in humanity as morality and conscience, and that the entire bone structure, the dental system and the lower jaw are formed as a mouth for this purpose. This will be expressed in such a face. This subform of the face will be associated with such a force that it will radiate, dismember, and tear apart the entire rest of the human body, transforming it into a different form, thereby overcoming other certain forces, so that it will be impossible to give the Christ, who will display such a mouth, a physical form like that of today's physical human beings. On the other hand, he will be given eyes that express all the power of compassion with which only eyes can look at beings—not to receive impressions, but to enter with the whole soul into their joys and sufferings. And he will have a forehead where one cannot suspect that the sensory impressions of the earth are being thought, but a forehead that will protrude slightly above the eyes will curve over that part of the brain: but not a “thinker's forehead” that reworks what is there, but rather, wonder will be expressed from the forehead that protrudes above the eyes and curves gently backward over the head, expressing what can be called wonder at the mysteries of the world. This will have to be a head that human beings cannot encounter in physical humanity.
That image of Christ should actually be something like the ideal of the Christ figure. And that is the feeling that strives toward this ideal when one strives for it in development: more and more, for the development of humanity, insofar as humanity will be artistically active in the representation of the highest ideal through spiritual science, the feeling must arise: You must not look at something that is there if you want to form Christ, but you must let it work and take effect within you and permeate yourself inwardly with everything that a spiritual immersion in the spiritual development of the world through the three important impulses—amazingness, compassion, and conscience—can give you.