Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

The Mission of the Individual Folk Souls
GA 121

14 June 1910, Oslo

8. The five post-Atlantean Civilizations. Greek and Teutonic Mythology

If we wish to study the development of Germanic-Nordic history and the spiritual impulses embodied therein, we must first of all bear in mind the fundamental character of Teutonic mythology. In the last lecture I pointed out that this Teutonic mythology, despite its many points of similarity with other mythologies, is nevertheless something quite unique. It is true, however, that among the Germanic peoples and tribes of Europe there was a large measure of agreement on fundamental conceptions of mythology so that in the regions far to the South it was possible for a uniform view of mythology to exist and, on the whole, a similar understanding of the kindred relationships between those mythologies. At one time there must have been identical understanding of the unique character of the Teutonic mythology throughout all the countries where this mythology, in one form or another, existed. The common features of Teutonic mythology are very different from the essential characteristic of Greek mythology, to say nothing of the Egyptian. Everything in Teutonic mythology is interrelated and differs widely from the substance of Graeco-Roman mythology. At the present time it is not easy to understand this essential element because—on account of certain intellectual assumptions which are outside the scope of the present lecture—there is a general tendency today to embark on the study of comparative religion. But this is a field in which it is possible to perpetuate the greatest nonsense. What happens as a rule when a person compares the mythologies and religions of various peoples with one another? He compares the superficial aspects of the stories of the gods and attempts to demonstrate that the figure of a particular god which appears in one mythology is also found in a like manner in another mythology, and so on. To anyone who knows the real facts this comparative study of religions shows a most disquieting trend in the anthropological studies of the present day, because it is everywhere the practice to compare externals. The impression created by the comparative studies of religions upon one who knows the facts is comparable to the impression made by someone who declares: “Thirty years ago I made the acquaintance of a man; he wore a uniform consisting of blue trousers, red coat, and some kind of head-gear, and so on.” Then he rapidly adds: “Twenty years ago I became acquainted with a man who wore the same uniform and ten years ago I met another who also wore the same uniform.” Now if the person in question were to believe that, because the men with whom he became acquainted thirty, twenty and ten years ago wore the same uniform, they could therefore be compared with one another in respect of their essential being, he could be greatly mistaken, for a totally different person might be wearing that uniform at those different times. The essential thing is to know what sort of man is concealed behind the uniform. This parallel may seem farfetched, yet in comparative religion it is tantamount to comparing Adonis to Christ. One is merely comparing externals. The apparel and the characteristics of the Beings in the various legends may be very similar or even alike, but the point is to know what is the nature of the divine-spiritual Beings concealed behind them. If completely different Beings are present in Adonis and in Christ, then we are merely comparing externals and the parallel has only superficial value. Nevertheless this comparative method is extremely popular at the present day. Therefore the results of the extensive research in the comparative study of religion with its purely external approach are not of the least consequence. The point is, rather, that one should learn to know to some extent from an understanding of the specific differences of the Folk Spirits the manner in which a particular people arrived at its mythology or other teachings about the gods, or even at its philosophy.

We can scarcely understand the fundamental character of Teutonic mythology unless we review once more the five successive ages of civilization in the post-Atlantean epoch. These five ages of civilization were brought about by migrations from West to East, so that at the end of these migrations the most mature, the most advanced human beings pushed forward into Indian territory and founded there the sacred primeval Indian civilization. The next civilization, and nearer to our own age, was the Persian which was followed by the Egypto-Chaldean-Babylonian, then the Graeco-Latin civilization and finally by our own.

The essential nature of these five civilizations can only be understood if one realizes that in past ages those who participated in them, including also the Angels, the Folk Spirits or Archangels and Time Spirits, were all quite different from one another. Today we propose to devote more attention to the way in which the human beings who participated in these civilizations differed from one another.

The men who, in ancient India for example, founded the ancient Indian civilization—which then found its literary expression in the Vedas and later Indian literature—were totally different from the Graeco-Latin peoples. They were different from the Persian, from the Egypto-Chaldean peoples and most of all from those peoples who were being prepared in Europe for the fifth post-Atlantean civilization. In what respect did they differ? The entire make-up of the members of the ancient Indian peoples was completely different from that of the inhabitants of all the countries lying further West. The peoples of ancient India had reached a high stage of evolution before they developed the ‘I’. In all other aspects of evolution they had made great strides. Behind them lay a very long period of development, but they had lived through it in a kind of dim consciousness. Then the ‘I’ entered in—they awoke to consciousness of the ‘I’. Amongst the Indians this came comparatively late, at a time when the people was already to a certain extent very mature, when the had already undergone what the Teutonic peoples still had to undergo when they had developed their ego. Bear this carefully in mind. The Teutonic peoples had to experience with their fully developed ‘I’ what the inhabitants of ancient India had passed through in a dim state of consciousness, without a developed ego-consciousness.

Now what was the nature of the development which humanity could undergo in the post-Atlantean epoch? In the old Atlantean times human beings were still endowed with a high degree of the old dim clairvoyance with which they saw into the divine spiritual world. They had an insight into the hidden workings of that world. Now imagine yourselves for a moment in old Atlantis before the migrations towards the East had begun. The air was still permeated with water vapour and misty exhalations. The soul of man was different too. He could not yet differentiate between the various external sense perceptions; at that time he found the spiritual content of the world seemingly diffused around him like a spiritual aura. Thus he possessed a certain natural clairvoyance which he had to overcome. This was achieved by the operation of the forces to whose influence human beings were subject when migrating from West to East. In the course of these migrations man underwent many different stages of spiritual development. There were peoples who, during their migration eastward, at first slept through, as it were, the period of emergence from the old clairvoyance and had already reached a higher stage of development when their ego was still in a dim state of consciousness. They went through various stages of development, but their ‘I’ was still in a dull, dreamlike condition. The Indians were the furthest evolved when their ego awoke to full self-consciousness. They were so far advanced that they possessed a rich inner soul-life which no longer showed any traces of that elementary stage in soul development which still persisted for a long period of time in the peoples of Europe. The Indians had already undergone that elementary stage a long time before. They awoke to self-consciousness when they were already endowed with spiritual powers and spiritual capacities which enabled them to penetrate deeply into the spiritual worlds. Whence all the activity and positive influence of the various Angels and Archangels on the human souls had become a matter of complete indifference to the more advanced members of the Indian people in their efforts to emerge from their old twilight conditions of clairvoyance. They had no direct consciousness of the work of the Archangels and Angels and all those spiritual Beings who were active, particularly in the folk spirit. All the work of these higher Beings upon their souls, upon their astral and etheric bodies, was accomplished at a time when they were not yet ego-conscious. They awoke to ego-consciousness when their souls had already reached a very high stage of development. The most advanced among them were able, after a brief development, to read again in the Akashic Record all that had formerly taken place in the evolution of humanity, so that they gazed out into their spiritual environment, into the Cosmos, and could read in the Akashic Record what was taking place in the spiritual world and what they had undergone in a dim twilight state of consciousness. They were unconsciously guided into higher spheres. Before their ego-consciousness had awakened they had acquired spiritual capacities that were much richer than those of the Western peoples. Thus the spiritual world could be directly observed by these men. The most advanced among those who guided the Indian people had risen to such high spiritual levels that, at the time when their ego awoke, they were no longer dependent upon the ego in order to observe how human development sprang forth, so to speak, from the Spirits of Form or Powers, but were more intimately associated with the Beings we call Spirits of Movement or Mights and those above them in the second Hierarchy, the Spirits of Wisdom or Dominions. These Beings were of special interest to them. The spiritual Beings of lower rank were, on the other hand, Beings whose domain they had already shared in former times and who therefore were no longer of particular importance to them. Thus they looked up to what later on they called the sum-total of the Spirits of Movement and of the Spirits of Wisdom, to that which was later characterized by the Greek expressions Dynamis and Kyriotetes. They beheld again these Beings and called them “Mula-prakriti”, the sum-total of the Spirits of Movement, and “Maha-purusha”, the sum-total of the Spirits of Wisdom, that which lives as if in a spiritual unity. They could attain to this vision because those who belonged to this people became ego conscious at such a late stage of development. They had already undergone what the later peoples still had to experience through their ‘I’.

The peoples belonging to the ancient Persian civilization were less highly developed. Their development was such that through their peculiar cognitive capacity, and through the awakening of their ‘I’ at a lower stage of evolution, they looked to the Powers or Spirits of Form. With these they were especially familiar; they could understand them to some extent and they were particularly interested in them. The peoples belonging to the Persian communities awakened to ego-consciousness one stage lower than the Indians, but it was a stage which the peoples of the West still had to reach. Hence the Persians were conversant with the Powers or Spirits of Form, known collectively as the ‘Amshaspands”. They were the radiations which we know as Spirits of Form or Powers and which, from their point of view, the peoples of the Persian civilization were specially fitted to perceive clairvoyantly.

We then come to the Chaldean peoples. They were already aware of the Primal Forces, the directing Time Spirits, the Spirits of Personality. Now the peoples of the Graeco-Latin age also had a certain consciousness of these Primal Forces or Spirits of Personality, but in a different form. In their case there was an additional factor which may help to clarify our understanding. The Greeks were nearer to the Germanic peoples. They became ego-conscious at a higher stage than the Germanic-Nordic peoples. The working of the Angels and the Archangels in the human soul which the Northern peoples still experienced was no longer directly experienced by the Graeco-Latin peoples, though they still had a distinct recollection of it. The difference between the Germanic and Graeco-Latin peoples is that the latter still preserved a memory of the participation of Angels and Archangels in the development of their soul-life. On the whole they had no clear recollection of this stage for they were still in a state of diminished consciousness. But now in clairvoyant memory they recalled this experience quite distinctly. The creation of this whole world, the working of the Angels and Archangels, both normal and abnormal, in the human soul was known to the Greeks. They preserved in their souls vivid memory pictures of what they had experienced. Now memory is much clearer, takes on sharper outlines than the immediate experiences of the present moment. It is no longer so fresh, no longer so youthful; memory or recollection has sharper contours, sharper outlines. Greek mythology is a memory-picture in bold, clear outlines of the influence or positive activity of the Angels and Archangels upon the human soul. If we do not approach Greek mythology in this way, if we simply compare Greek names with other names in the various mythologies, if we do not take into account the influence of special forces, nor understand the Significance of the figures that appear as Apollo and Minerva and so on, then we are making a superficial study of comparative religion; we are only comparing externals. The manner or mode of perception in those days is the important point.

When we have grasped this, we realize that Greek mythology was built up from conscious memories. The Egyptians and Chaldeans had only a dim recollection of the activity of the Angels and Archangels, but they were able to perceive the world of Primal Forces. It seemed as if they were beginning to lose the memory of Angelic beings. Persian mythology, on the other hand, had completely forgotten the world of the Angels or Archangels, but at the same time men were able to look into the world of the Powers or Spirits of Form. That which is to be found in Greek mythology had been forgotten by the Persians and totally forgotten by the Indians. When they looked into the Akashic Record they perceived again the entire sequence of events of the earlier epochs and created pictures of the earlier events out of their knowledge which however was divine knowledge which they owed to more highly developed spiritual powers. This also helps to explain the great difficulty which the peoples of the East experienced in understanding the spiritual life of the West and that superior attitude which they adopted towards the spiritual life of the West. They arc prepared to accept the materialistic civilization of the West, but the spiritual culture of the West—unless they come to it indirectly through Spiritual Science—remains more or less closed to them. They had already reached a high stage of evolution at a time when Christ Jesus had not yet descended upon Earth. He only incarnated in the fourth post-Atlantean epoch. That is an event which could no longer be grasped with the forces which the Indian people had developed. In order to apprehend the coming of Christ one needed faculties belonging to a less lofty station of the ‘I’—a dwelling of the ‘I’ in more humble forces of the human soul.

The Teutonic peoples not only preserved a memory of the working of the Angels and Archangels into the soul of man, but even at the time when Christ Jesus walked upon Earth were aware that they were still subject to these influences and that they participated in the activity of the Angels and Archangels who were still active in their souls. When they underwent these inner experiences of the soul the Graeco-Latin peoples recalled something which they had gone through in former times. The Germanic peoples responded to these experiences more personally. Their ego had awakened at the stage of existence when the Folk Spirits and those spiritual Beings who were still subject to the Folk Spirits were still active in their souls; hence these peoples were nearest to the events that took place in old Atlantis.

In old Atlantis man beheld the spiritual Powers and spoke of a kind of unity of the Godhead, because he enjoyed direct perception into the old primeval states of human evolution. At that time one could still perceive the dominion of the Spirits of Wisdom and of the Spirits of Movement, a dominion which the Indians of a later epoch perceived again in the Akashic Records. These Germanic peoples of the West had raised themselves one stage above this level of perception, so that they experienced directly the transition from the old perception to the new. They perceived an active weaving of real spiritual powers at a time when the ego was not yet awake. But at the same time they saw the gradual awakening of the ‘I’ and the penetration of man's soul by the Angels and Archangels. They were aware of this direct transition. They preserved a clairvoyant memory of an earlier weaving life, when everything was seen through the dim mists of Atlantis and when, from out of this sea of mist, there emerged what we have come to know as the divine-spiritual Beings immediately above man. The old Gods, however, who were active before the Gods intervened in the life of the human soul, and who could now be seen and with whom men felt themselves to be united, those divine Beings who were active in the very far distant past at the time of old Atlantis, were called the Vanir. After Atlantis men saw the weaving of the Angels and Archangels whom they called the Aesir. They were the Beings who as Angels and Archangels were concerned with the ‘I’ of man which then awoke at an elementary level. These Beings took over the leadership of the Germanic peoples. What the other peoples of the East had “slept through”, namely, the perception of how the soul, the inner life, was gradually developed by means of the various forces which were bestowed upon it by the normal and abnormal Angels and Archangels, this had to be experienced by the peoples of Europe beginning from the lowest stage. They had to be fully conscious in order that these soul-forces might gradually develop.

Thus Nordic man perceived the figures of the Gods, the divine Beings working directly upon his soul; he saw the human soul wresting its way out of the Cosmos. This was direct experience to him. He did not recall in retrospect how the souls of men had been ‘in-formed’ into their bodies; rather did he see all this as an immediate and present happening. He was there with his own ego; he was a conscious witness of it. Even until the eighth, ninth and tenth centuries AD he retained this feeling, this understanding of how the forces of the soul are gradually formed and crystallized into the body. In the first place he beheld the Archangelic Beings who worked in his soul and endowed him with his psychic potentialities, and the greatest of these Archangels was Wotan or Odin.1See Appendix. He saw him at work upon his soul and he saw how he worked into his soul. How did he perceive Wotan or Odin? Who or what was he? In what form did Nordic man learn to love Odin and above all to understand him? He learned to recognize him as one of those Archangels who in the past had decided to renounce their development to higher stages. He came to know Odin as one of the abnormal Archangels, as one of the great figures of renunciation in ancient times, who had assumed the office of Archangel when they took upon themselves the important task of working into the souls of men. Nordic ma experienced the activity of Odin at a time when he was still in the process of giving the gift of language to the incarnating soul of man. The manner in which Odin himself worked upon his peoples in order to endow them with language has survived in a remarkable way. It was described as a Divine Initiation. The means by which Odin acquired the power to give the gift of language to the Teutonic peoples is described as follows: before acquiring this capacity Odin had undergone Initiation by drinking at the spring of Mimir the magic draught of the Gods, that magic draught which once upon a time in the primeval past had been the draught of the Giants. This draught embodied not merely a generalized form of wisdom, but represented the wisdom that lives directly in the spoken sounds of speech. At his Initiation Odin won power over that wisdom which lives in sound. He learned how to make use of it when he underwent a long Initiation which lasted nine days and from which he was then released by Mimir, the ancient bearer of wisdom. Thus Odin became Lord of the power of language. This explains why the later saga traces the language of the bards or skalds back to Odin. Runic lore which in olden times was thought to be much more closely related to language than later literature and letters was also traced back to Odin. Therefore the manner in which the soul, indirectly through the etheric body, and interpenetrating the physical body, acquired the power of speech through the appropriate Archangel is expressed in the wonderful stories about Odin.

Similar Archangels are to be found amongst the companions of Odin: Hönir who gave the power of thought and Lödur who gave that which is intimately connected with race, namely pigmentation and the character of the blood. These two Beings, therefore, are Archangels more in the normal line. In Vili and Ve, on the other hand, we have Archangels of abnormal development. They are Beings who work more in the inner life, in the hidden recesses of the soul as I pointed out in the last lecture. But an ego which is itself at an abnormal stage of evolution when it witnesses the cultivation of the subordinate forces of the human soul, feels itself to be intimately related to an abnormal Archangel. Odin, therefore, is not regarded as an abnormal Archangel, but rather as the kind of Archangel whose renunciation is akin to that of the Western peoples who arc more aware that their inner development had been deferred, whereas the Eastern peoples by-passed certain stages of their psychic development until they awakened to ego-consciousness. Hence there lives especially in the soul of the Teutonic peoples all that is associated with the Archangelic forces of Odin stirring in the primitive depths of the human soul.

When we stated that the Angels are responsible for transmitting to the individual human beings the achievements of the Archangels, so also an ‘I’ which awakens at such an elementary level of soul-life is particularly concerned in seeing that the intentions of the Archangels are communicated to that ego. Hence Germanic-Nordic man has an interest in an Angel-being who is endowed with special power, but who at the same time is closely related to the single human being and his individuality. And that Being is Thor.2See Appendix. We can only recognize Thor when we see in him a Being who could have risen to far higher rank had he followed the normal course of evolution, but who renounced advancement comparatively early and remained at the stage of a Angel in order that, at the time when man awoke to ego-consciousness in the course of his soul's evolution, he could become the guiding Spirit in the spiritual life of the Teutonic peoples. What gives the immediate feeling that Thor is related to the individual human ego is that what was to be transmitted to every individual ‘I’ from the spiritual world could, in fact, be transmitted. If we bear this in mind we shall also understand more clearly the fragmentary information that has come down to us. It is important to have a right understanding of these individual Gods. Germanic-Nordic man perceived and himself experienced this imprinting of the soul in the body. He witnessed the integration of the ego into the body and the birth of ego-consciousness.

Now we know that the ego is incarnated in the pulsation of our blood and that everything within has its counterpart without, that everything microcosmic has its parallel in the macrocosmic. The work of Odin who gave speech and runic wisdom, who worked indirectly through the breathing, has its counterpart in the movement of the wind in the macrocosm. The regular inhalation of the air through our respiratory organs which transform the air into words and speech corresponds to the movements and currents of the wind in the macrocosm outside. Just as we feel within ourselves the power of Odin in the transformation of air into words, so too we must perceive his presence and activity in the ambient winds. But those who still preserved a certain degree of clairvoyance really saw the presence of Odin everywhere in the cosmic element of the air, saw how he formed speech by means of his breath. This Nordic man perceived as a unity. Just as that which lives in us and organizes our speech—that is to say, in the form in which speech existed amongst the Nordic peoples—penetrates into the ego and sets the blood pulsating so too the inner organization of speech in man finds its parallel in the macrocosm in thunder and lightning. The gift of speech precedes the birth of the ego in man. Hence the ‘I’ is everywhere felt to be the son of Odin to whom we owe the gift of speech. Thor plays an active part in the implanting of the individual ego, and in the microcosm the pulsation of the blood corresponds to the thunder and lightning in the macrocosm. Thus, in the macrocosm, the parallel to the pulsation of the blood in man is the thunder and lightning in the sighing winds and the weaving clouds. Germanic-Nordic man sees this clairvoyantly as a unity; he perceives that the soughing of the wind and the flashing of the lightning are intimately related to the breathing. He sees how the air he inhales passes into the blood stream and sets the ‘I’ pulsating. Today this is looked upon as a physical process, but to Germanic-Nordic man it was an astral experience. He felt the kinship of the inner fire of the blood and of outer lightning. He felt the pulse-beat in his blood and knew it to be the pulse-beat of the ‘I’. He was aware of this inner pulsation and knew that it would recur. But he paid no heed to the external physical process. All this was seen clairvoyantly. He felt that it was the deed of Thor which caused the pulse to beat and made the blood return again and again to the same source. He felt the Thor-force in his ‘I’ as the hammer of Thor returning ever and again into his hand; he felt the power of one of the mightiest Angels who had ever been honoured or revered, because he was a mighty Being who was seen to have remained behind at the Angel stage.

The way in which the spiritual force holds together the physical body is described in the Teutonic mythology where it says that the ‘I’ is that which holds together the soul and body in the formative stage. Germanic-Nordic man sees the weaving of the body and soul from within, and in later years he still understands how, originating in the astral, his inner life becomes integrated, how the inner answers, so to speak, to the outer. He could still respond when he learned from the Initiates that man was built out of the Cosmos. He was able to look back to earlier stages, to what had been told him about the events which reflected the relationship between the Angels and the Archangels, to those earlier stages when man was born out of the macrocosm in physical-spiritual form. He was able to perceive how the individual was built up out of the macrocosm and how he was an integral part of it. He sought in the macrocosm for those occurrences which are reflected in the microcosm. He could distinguish in the human microcosm, the microcosmic North, the cool realm where human thoughts are woven and whence the body is supplied with the twelve cranial nerves. He sees the weaving spirit in what he calls Nebelheim or Niflheim; he sees the twelve rivers which converge to form physically the twelve cranial nerves. He sees how the forces that issue from the microcosmic South, from the human heart, counteract the forces from above. He looks for them outside in the macrocosm and understands when he is told that they are called Muspelheim. Thus, even in the Christian era, it was still possible for him to comprehend the microcosm in terms of the whole macrocosm. And one could go back further still and show him how man gradually originated out of the macrocosm as extract of the whole world. He was able to look back into that time and he could understand that these events have a long ancestry, which he himself still sees as a working of the Angels and Archangels into his soul. He realizes that these events have a long ancestry and the conceptions he thus acquires we encounter in the old Teutonic Genesis, as the origin of mankind out of the entire macrocosm.

From Ginnungagap, the primeval abyss of Teutonic mythology, a new Earth emerges after having passed through the three earlier incarnations of Old Saturn, Old Sun, and Old Moon. The emergent world without form and void comes forth again out of Pralaya where the kingdoms of nature are not yet differentiated and men are still undivided and completely spiritual beings. It was then clear to Nordic man how the later conditions have developed out of this original abyss.

Now it is interesting to see how the events of those times are portrayed in Teutonic mythology in the form of imaginative pictures, events which we in our anthroposophical teachings describe in more sophisticated terms, using concepts in place of images. In Anthroposophy we are given a description of the events which took place when the Sun and Moon were still united, of the separation of the Moon and of the evolutionary transition to the later “Riesenheim”. Everything which existed during the Atlantean epoch is described as a continuation of earlier epochs and as the particular concern of the Teutonic or Germanic people.

Today I only wanted to give an idea of how the Germanic peoples awakened to the ego while still at an elementary stage of evolution and how Nordic man perceived in full consciousness the Folk Soul, the soul of Thor and so on. I wanted to show how, as an ego-being, he was able to respond immediately to the in-weaving of still higher Beings who, however, come from an entirely different realm from those we find among the Eastern peoples.

Tomorrow we shall attempt to explore the lesser-known branches of Teutonic mythology. We shall discover how they are harbingers of that which dwells in the Folk Souls and we shall see what is the nature of our Western Folk Souls.

Achter Vortrag

Wenn man die Entwickelung der germanisch-nordischen Geschichte und die darin geschilderten geistigen Impulse studieren will, dann hat man nötig, den Grundcharakter der germanisch-nordischen Mythologie zunächst ins Auge zu fassen, und es ist schon das letzte Mal darauf aufmerksam gemacht worden, daß diese germanisch-nordische Mythologie, trotz manchem, worin sie Ähnlichkeit hat mit anderen Mythologien und Götterauffassungen, doch etwas ganz Eigentümliches ist. Dabei bleibt doch richtig, daß ein sehr weitgehender Grundkern mythologischer Auffassung sich über alle germanischen Völker und Stämme Europas hin erstreckt, so daß bis weit nach Süden hin eine einheitliche mythologische Auffassung, im Grunde genommen ein gleichartiges Verständnis jener verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen möglich ist. Gerade für das Eigenartige der germanisch-nordischen Mythologie muß durch alle Volksgebiete, in denen in der einen oder anderen Form diese Mythologie ausgebreitet war, einstmals ein gleiches Verständnis vorhanden gewesen sein; denn es unterscheidet sich das, was gemeinsam ist in der Mythologie der germanisch-nordischen Völker, ganz gewaltig schon von dem Wesenskern der griechischen Mythologie, ganz zu schweigen von der ägyptischen, so daß alles, was verwandt ist in der germanischen Mythologie, einander ganz nahe steht und weit entfernt. ist von dem, was das Wesentliche in der griechischen und römischen Mythologie ist. Man kann aber dieses Wesentliche heute nicht sehr leicht verstehen, aus dem Grunde nicht, weil aus Erkenntnisvoraussetzungen — über welche zu sprechen hier zu weit führen würde — heute eine gewisse Sehnsucht, ein gewisser Trieb herrscht, die Religionen der verschiedenen Völker einfach miteinander zu vergleichen. Vergleichende Religionswissenschaft, vergleichende Mythologie, das ist etwas, wofür heute viel Enthusiasmus herrscht. Es ist dies ein Gebiet, auf dem es möglich ist, den allergrößten Unfug zu treiben. Was geschieht denn gewöhnlich, wenn man Mythologien und Religionen einzelner Völker miteinander vergleicht? Man vergleicht die Außerlichkeiten, die in den Göttergeschichten vorliegen, sucht nachzuweisen, daß die eine Göttergestalt in der einen Mythologie vorkommt und in ähnlicher Weise auch in der anderen und dergleichen mehr. Diese Religionsvergleichung ist für denjenigen, der den Tatbestand, der darin vorliegt, wirklich kennt, so ziemlich das Unbehaglichste in unserer gegenwärtigen Wissenschaftsrichtung, deshalb, weil man eigentlich überall nur die Außerlichkeiten vergleicht. Eine solche Religionsvergleichung macht auf den, der den Tatbestand kennt, ungefähr den Eindruck, wie wenn jemand sagte: «Vor dreißig Jahren lernte ich einen Menschen kennen. Der trug eine Uniform, die war so und so beschaffen. Der Mann hatte blaue Hosen, einen roten Rock und diese oder jene Kopfbedeckung und so weiter» und schnell dann fortfährt: «Dann habe ich vor 20 Jahren einen Menschen kennen gelernt, der trug dieselbe Uniform und vor zehn Jahren wieder einen, der trug wieder dieselbe Uniform.» Wenn der Betreffende nun glauben würde, die Menschen, die er da kennen gelernt hat vor dreißig Jahren, zwanzig Jahren und zehn Jahren, weil sie gleiche Uniform trugen, auch ihrer Wesenheit nach miteinander vergleichen zu können, so kann er sich sehr irren; denn es kann ein ganz anderer Mensch, in den verschiedenen Zeiten, in der Uniform drinstecken, und es kommt doch im wesentlichen darauf an, was für ein Mensch in der Uniform steckt. Das Gleichnis ist scheinbar weit hergeholt, und dennnoch kommt es bei der Religionsvergleichung auf dasselbe hinaus, wenn man den Adonis nimmt und ihn mit dem Christus vergleicht. Da vergleicht man nur die äußere Uniform. Kleidung und Eigenschaften der Wesen in den Sagen können sehr ähnlich oder gleich sein, aber es handelt sich darum, was für geistig-göttliche Individualitäten darinnen sind, und wenn das ganz andere Individualitäten sind, die im Adonis und im Christus darinnen stecken, so hat eben diese Vergleichung nur den Wert einer Vergleichung der Uniform. Dennoch ist diese Vergleichung heute ungemein beliebt. Es kommt also auf das vielfach durchaus gar nicht an, was heute die vergleichende Religionswissenschaft mit ihren ganz äußerlichen Methoden auf diesem Gebiete zutage fördern kann. Es kommt vielmehr darauf an, daß man kennen lernt, gewissermaßen aus der Differentiation der Volksgeister heraus, die Art und Weise wie dieses oder jenes Volk, sei es zu seiner Mythologie, sei es zu seiner sonstigen Götterlehre, sei es selbst zu seiner Philosophie, gekommen ist.

Wir können daher den Grundcharakter der germanisch-nordischen Mythologie kaum anders verstehen, als wenn wir noch einmal einen Streifzug machen durch die aufeinanderfolgenden fünf Kulturperioden der nachatlantischen Zeit. Diese fünf Kulturperioden wurden dadurch hervorgerufen, daß von Westen nach Osten Wanderzüge stattgefunden haben, daß sozusagen die allerreifsten, fortgeschrittensten Menschen nach Absolvierung dieser Wanderzüge in das indische Gebiet vorrückten und dann die heilige uralt-indische Kultur begründeten. Weiter herauf, gegen unsere Zeit, wird die persische Kultur begründet, dann die ägyptisch-chaldäisch-babylonische Kultur, dann die griechischlateinische Kultur, auf die endlich die unserige folgt. Diese fünf Kulturen sind in ihren Wesenskernen nur dadurch zu verstehen, daß man weiß, daß die Menschen, die an diesen Kulturen beteiligt sind, und auch die Engelwesen, die Volksseelen oder Erzengel und die Zeitgeister in den verflossenen Zeiten selber alle durchaus voneinander verschieden waren. Heute wollen wir mehr Rücksicht darauf nehmen, wie die Menschen verschieden waren, die an diesen Kulturen teilgenommen haben.

Grundverschieden waren die Menschen, die im alten Indien die uralt-indische Kultur begründeten, die dann ihre literarische Einkleidung in den Veden und in der späteren indischen Literatur gefunden hat, grundverschieden zum Beispiel von den griechisch-lateinischen Völkern, verschieden schon von den persischen, verschieden von den ägyptisch-chaldäischen und am meisten verschieden von den Völkern, welche in Europa vorbereitend heranwachsen zur fünften Kulturperiode der nachatlantischen Zeit. Inwiefern waren sie aber verschieden? Es war die ganze Menschheitsanlage der uralt-indischen Völker absolut verschieden von den Menschen aller weiter nach Westen gelegenen Volksgebiete. Wenn wir uns eine Vorstellung davon bilden wollen, welche Verschiedenheit da bestand, so müssen wir uns sagen: Es waren die Völker des alten Indien sehr weit in der menschlichen Entwickelung fortgeschritten, bevor sie aufnahmen das Ich. Sie hatten in bezug auf alles übrige in der Menschheitsentwickelung große, ungeheuer große Fortschritte gemacht, sie hatten hinter sich eine lange, lange Menschheitsentwickelung. Das hatten sie aber durchgemacht gewissermaßen in einer Art von Dumpfheit. Dann trat das «Ich» ein, das Bewußtsein des Ich. Das trat in verhältnismäßig später Zeit beim indischen Volke ein; zu einer Zeit, als das indische Volk in gewissem Grade schon sehr reif war, als es schon durchgemacht hatte, was die germanisch-nordischen Völker noch durchmachen mußten, während sie schon ihr Ich besaßen. — Fassen Sie das wohl ins Auge! Die germanisch-nordischen Völker mußten mit ihrem vollentwickelten Ich bei dem dabei sein, was die Bewohner des uralten Indiens in einer gewissen Dumpfheit, also ohne mit ihrem Ich dabei zu sein, durchgemacht hatten.

Was ist es denn nun, was man in der nachatlantischen Zeit als Menschheitsentwickelung durchmachen konnte? Wenn man in der alten atlantischen Zeit als Mensch lebte, so war man als solcher Mensch noch mit einem höheren Grade alten, dumpfen Hellsehens behaftet. Man sah durch altes, dumpfes Hellsehen in die göttlich-geistige Welt hinein, man sah die Vorgänge, die sich in dieser Welt abspielen. Versetzen Sie sich nun eine Weile hinüber in das alte atlantische Land, bevor die Züge nach Osten gehen. Die Luft war noch durchsetzt mit Wasser- und Nebeldämpfen. Aber auch die Seele der Menschen war anders. Der Mensch unterschied noch nicht einmal die verschiedenen äußeren Sinneswahrnehmungen voneinander. Es war damals so, daß er wie ein geistiges Aroma, wie eine geistige Aura den geistigen Gehalt der Welt um sich ausgebreitet fand. Ein gewisses Hellsehen war also da vorhanden, und aus diesem Hellsehen mußte man herauskommen. Dies geschah durch die Wirkung der Kräfte, in deren Bereich die Menschen kamen bei den Wanderzügen von Westen nach Osten. Bei diesen Wanderzügen wurden wieder die verschiedensten Seelenentwickelungen durchgemacht. Da gab es Völker, welche, indem sie hinüberwanderten nach dem Osten, zuerst wie verschliefen das Heraustreten aus dem alten Hellsehen und schon auf einer höheren Stufe der Entwickelung waren, als ihr Ich noch immer in Dumpfheit sich befand. Sie machten verschiedene Stufen der Entwickelung durch, und ihr Ich war noch immer ein dumpfes, ein träumerisches. Am weitesten waren die Inder entwickelt, als ihr Ich mit vollem Selbstbewußtsein erwachte. Da waren sie schon so, daß sie ein sehr reiches inneres Seelenleben hatten, das gar nicht mehr diejenigen Zustände besonders in sich zeigte, welche die Völker Europas noch lange erlebten. Diese hatten sie schon durchgemacht. Sie erwachten zum Selbstbewußtsein, als sie bereits mit geistigen Kräften und geistigen Fähigkeiten ausgestattet waren, durch die sie in hohem Grade hineindringen konnten in die geistigen Welten. Daher war den Fortgeschrittenen der indischen Bevölkerung bei ihrem Sichherausarbeiten aus ihren alten dämmerhaften Hellseherzuständen all das Treiben und Tätigsein der verschiedenen Engel- und Erzengelwesen an den menschlichen Seelen im Grunde genommen höchst gleichgültig geworden. Die Arbeit der Erzengel und Engel und derjenigen geistigen Wesenheiten überhaupt, die besonders im Volksgeiste arbeiteten, hatten sie nicht mehr unmittelbar beobachtet. Das war an ihrer Seele, an ihrem Astral- und Ätherleib geleistet worden, als sie sozusagen noch gar nicht dabei waren. Sie erwachten, als ihre Seele mit einem ungeheueren Reifegrade bereits behaftet war; sie erwachten so, daß die Fortgeschrittensten dasjenige, was früher mit der Menschheitsentwickelung geschehen war, durch eine leichte Entwickelung bereits in der Akasha-Chronik wieder lesen konnten, so daß sie hinausblickten in die Umgebung, in die Welt und daß sie dadurch in der Akasha-Chronik lesen konnten, was in der geistigen Welt vorging, was sie durchgemacht hatten in dumpfem, dämmerhaftem Bewußtseinszustande. Sie waren unbewußt in höhere Gebiete geleitet, sie hatten, bevor ihr Ichbewußtsein erwacht war, geistige Fähigkeiten erlangt, die viel reicher waren als die Seelenfähigkeiten der westlichen Völker. So war die geistige Welt für diese Menschen eine unmittelbare Beobachtung. Die Fortgeschrittensten der indischen Volksführung waren so weit, daß sie, als ihr Ich erwachte, tatsächlich nicht einmal mehr darauf angewiesen waren, zu beobachten, wie sozusagen die menschliche Entwickelung heraussprudelte aus den Geistern der Form oder Gewalten, sondern es war ihnen dasjenige vertrauter, was wir Geister der Bewegung, Mächte nennen und dasjenige, was über diesen ist, die Geister der Weisheit. Das interessierte sie ganz besonders. Diejenigen geistigen Wesenheiten, die darunter stehen, waren dagegen solche Wesenheiten, in deren Bereich sie schon früher gewesen, die ihnen daher nicht mehr von so ganz besonderer Wichtigkeit waren. So sahen sie auf zu dem, was sie später nannten die Summe aller Geister der Bewegung und aller Geister der Weisheit; zu dem, was man später mit den griechischen Ausdrücken Dynameis und Kyriotetes bezeichnete. Zu diesen sahen sie auf und sagten zu ihnen: MulaPrakriti, das ist die Summe der Geister der Bewegung, und Maha-Purusha, die gesamte Summe der Geister der Weisheit, was wie in einer geistigen Einheit lebt. Solche Anschauungen konnten sie gewinnen, weil die Angehörigen dieses Volkes in so späten Zuständen der Entwickelung zu ihrem Ich erwachten. Sie hatten schon abgemacht, was die späteren Völker mit ihrem Ich noch mit anschauen mußten.

Weniger weit entwickelt waren die Völker der persischen Kultur. Sie waren so weit durch ihr eigenartiges Erkenntnisvermögen und durch das Erwachen ihres Ich auf einer niedrigeren Stufe, daß sie sich beschäftigen konnten mit den Wesenheiten der Gewalten oder Geister der Form. Mit diesen wurden sie ganz besonders vertraut. Diese durchschauten sie in gewisser Weise, und sie interessierten sich auch vorzugsweise für sie. Eine Stufe tiefer als die Inder, aber doch auf einer Stufe, auf die dann wieder die Völker des Westens sich heraufarbeiten mußten, erwachten die Völker der persischen Gemeinschaften. Daher wurden sie mit den Gewalten oder Geistern der Form bekannt, die sie unter dem Begriffe der «Amshaspands» zusammenfaßten. Das sind die ‚Ausstrahlungen, die wir als die Geister der Form oder Gewalten kennen und die, von ihrem Gesichtspunkte aus, gerade die Völker der persischen Kultur besonders gut beobachten konnten.

Dann kommen wir zu den chaldäischen Völkern. Die hatten schon ein Bewußtsein von dem, was wir als Urkräfte, als führende Zeitgeister kennen. Sie hatten ein Bewußtsein von den Wesenheiten, die als Urkräfte, als Geister der Persönlichkeit erfaßt werden sollen. In einer anderen Weise hatten wiederum die Völker der griechisch-lateinischen Zeit gerade auch von diesen Urkräften oder Geistern der Persönlichkeit ein gewisses Bewußtsein. Aber bei ihnen war noch etwas ganz anderes vorhanden, und das war das, was uns ein Stück weiter in der Erkenntnis führen könnte. Die Griechen standen den germanischen Völkern noch näher. Aber doch erwachte dort das Ich auf einer höheren Stufe als bei den germanisch-nordischen Völkern. Das, was bei den nordischen Völkern noch als Arbeit der Engel und Erzengel durchlebt wurde, das durchlebten die griechisch-lateinischen Völker nicht mehr unmittelbar. Sie hatten aber noch eine deutliche Erinnerung daran. Denken Sie sich also, daß der Unterschied zwischen den germanischen und den griechisch-lateinischen Völkern der ist, daß die griechischlateinischen Völker noch eine Erinnerung daran hatten, wie die Engel und Erzengel an ihrem Seelenleben, das sie in sich entwickelt hatten, teilgenommen haben. Sie hatten dies im Grunde genommen aber nicht allzu deutlich durchgemacht. Sie waren dabei noch in einem dumpfen Bewußtseinszustande. Doch in der Erinnerung trat es ihnen nun ganz besonders vor die Seele. Die Schöpfung dieser ganzen Welt, die Art und Weise, wie die Engel und Erzengel — die abnormen und die normalen — in die menschliche Seele hereinwirken, das kannten die Griechen. Was sie durchgemacht hatten, das hatten sie in einem gewaltigen Erinnerungsbilde in ihrer Seele. Erinnerung ist das, was abgeklärter ist, festere Konturen hat als das, was man erlebt. Es ist nicht mehr so frisch und nicht mehr so jung, aber es hat schärfere Umrisse, schärfere Konturen, was als Gedächtnis, als Erinnerung auftritt. Der Einfluß oder Impuls der Engel- und Erzengelwelt auf die Menschenseele wurde bei den Griechen aus der Erinnerung in festen, scharfen Konturen wachgerufen. Das ist die griechische Mythologie. Wer sie nicht so ansieht, sondern nur die Namen vergleicht mit Namen, die anderswo auftreten, also nicht die besonderen Kräfte ins Auge faßt, nicht die Gestalten auffaßt, die auftreten als Apollo, Minerva und so weiter, der treibt äußere Religionsvergleichung, vergleicht bloß die Uniformen. Die Art und Weise, wie damals angeschaut wurde, ist es, worauf es ankommt.

Nachdem wir dies gesehen haben, werden wir zugeben: Die Griechen formten sich ihre Mythologie heraus aus der Erinnerung. — Die ägyptisch-chaldäische Zeit hatte nur eine dunkle, dumpfe Erinnerung an das Wirken der Engel- und Erzengelwelt, aber einen Ausblick in die Welt der Urkräfte. Es ist bei ihr so, wie wenn sie anfinge, etwas zu vergessen. In der persischen Mythologie oder Götterlehre haben wir dafür ein vollständiges Vergessen der Engel- und Erzengelwelt, aber zugleich einen Ausblick in die Welt der Gewalten oder Geister der Form. Das, was in der griechischen Mythologie liegt, haben die persischen Völker und erst recht die indischen vergessen. Sie schauten die ganzen Vorgänge bereits wieder aus der Akasha-Chronik an und schufen sich die Bilder der früheren Vorgänge aus ihrer Erkenntnis heraus, die aber schon vergöttlichte Erkenntnis mit höher entwickelten Geisteskräften war. Daraus werden Sie aber auch erkennen, daß es gerade jenen Völkern des Ostens ungemein schwer wird, das abendländische Geistesleben zu verstehen. Daher kommt dann jene Zugeknöpftheit der Völker des Ostens gegenüber dem abendländischen Geistesleben. Sie werden gewiß die materielle abendländische Kultur annehmen; aber die geistige Kultur des Abendlandes bleibt ihnen, wenn sie nicht auf dem Umwege der Geisteswissenschaft dazu kommen, mehr oder weniger verschlossen. Sie standen auf einer menschlich hohen Stufe zu der Zeit schon, als auf der Erde noch kein Christus Jesus war. Der kam erst in der vierten nachatlantischen Kulturepoche. Das ist ein Ereignis, das man nicht mehr auffassen konnte mit den Kräften, welche sich aus dem indischen Volkstum heraus entwickelt hatten. Dazu brauchte man noch Kräfte, die verwandt waren mit einem weniger hohen Stand des Ich, mit einem Darinstehen des Ich in untergeordneten Seelenkräften.

In den germanisch-nordischen Gebieten war das Hereinarbeiten der Angeloi und Archangeloi in die Menschenseele nicht etwa bloß als Erinnerung vorhanden, sondern so, daß die Menschen, selbst noch zur Zeit als der Christus Jesus auf der Erde wandelte, das noch sehen konnten, daß sie noch darin standen, daß sie die Angelegenheiten der Engelund Erzengelwesen, wie sie noch in ihrer Seele arbeiteten, mitmachten. Die griechisch-lateinischen Völker erinnerten sich bei diesen SeelenErlebnissen an etwas, was sie früher einmal durchgemacht hatten.

Die germanischen Völker lebten darin als in ihren eigenen, unmittelbaren Angelegenheiten. Ihr Ich war erwacht auf der Stufe des Daseins, wo noch hereinarbeiteten in die Seele die Volksgeister und diejenigen geistigen Wesenheiten, die selbst noch unter den Volksgeistern stehen. Daher standen diese Völker am allernächsten dem, was wir als die Vorgänge in der alten Atlantis drüben kennen.

In der alten Atlantis sah man auf zu den geistigen Mächten und sprach von einer Art von Einheitsgottheit, weil man eben hinaufsah in unmittelbarer Wahrnehmung in alte, urferne Entwickelungszustände der Menschheit. Man sah damals gleichsam noch das Walten der Geister der Weisheit und das Walten der Geister der Bewegung, das die späteren Inder wieder aus der Akasha-Chronik heraus beobachteten. Um eine Stufe hatten sich diese Völker des Westens über diesen Standpunkt hinauserhoben, so daß sie in unmittelbarer Gegenwart das Herausdrängen aus der alten Anschauung in die neue hinein erlebten. Sie sahen in ein Weben und Leben von wirklichen geistigen Mächten zu einer Zeit, als das Ich noch nicht erwacht war. Aber sie sahen zugleich, wie das Ich nach und nach erwachte, und wie Engelwesen und Erzengelwesen in die Seele eingriffen. Diesen unmittelbaren Übergang nahmen sie wahr. Sie hatten eine Erinnerung an ein früheres Weben und Leben, als die Anschauung noch so war, daß man gleichsam alles wie in einem Nebelmeer sah, und sie schauten, wie dann aus diesem Nebelmeer für sie das herauskam, was wir als die göttlich-geistigen Gestalten, die unmittelbar über dem Menschen stehen, kennen gelernt haben. Die alten Götter aber, die gewirkt haben, bevor in das menschliche Seelenleben die Götter eingriffen, die man jetzt sah, mit denen man sich verbunden fühlte, diese göttlichen Wesenheiten, die in ferner, ferner Vergangenheit, in der Zeit der alten Atlantis, wirksam waren, nannte man die Wanen. Herausgetreten aus der alten atlantischen Zeit sind dann die Menschen und sahen auf das Weben der Engel und Erzengel; die nannte man die Asen. Das waren diejenigen Wesen, die sich als Engel und Erzengel kümmerten um das Ich der Menschen, das jetzt auf der untersten Stufe erwachte. Vorgesetzt waren sie jenen Völkern. Das, was die anderen Völker des Ostens verschlafen haben, nämlich zu sehen, wie die Seele sich hinaufarbeitet durch die verschiedenen Kräfte, die von den normalen und abnormen Engel- und Erzengelwesen verliehen werden, das mußten die Völker Europas von unten auf beginnend durchmachen; sie mußten ganz dabei sein, damit sich diese Seelenkräfte nach und nach entwickelten.

So waren also die Göttergestalten, welche sich sozusagen vor die Seele des germanisch-nordischen Menschen stellten, die Göttergestalten, die unmittelbar an seiner Seele arbeiteten und dasjenige, was er selbst als das Sichherausringen des Menschlich-Seelischen aus dem Kosmischen beobachtete, unmittelbare Anschauungen; das war etwas, was er unmittelbar erlebte. Er schaute nicht zurück in der Erinnerung auf die Art und Weise, wie die Seelen sich in die Leiber hineingebildet haben, er sieht vielmehr als gegenwärtig, was da geschieht. Es ist seine eigene Entwickelung, und er ist mit seinem Ich dabei. Er hat Verständnis dafür bis ins achte, neunte, zehnte Jahrhundert nach Christus. Er hat sich ein Verständnis dafür bewahrt, wie die Seelenkräfte nach und nach sich bilden, sich hineinkristallisieren in den Leib. Zuerst schaut er auf die Erzengelwesen, welche in seiner Seele arbeiteten, indem sie ihm das gaben, was seine Seelenkräfte werden sollten, und da findet er als den hervorragendsten dieser Erzengel Wotan oder Odin und sieht ihn an seiner Seele arbeiten, sieht, wie er in seine Seele hineinarbeitet. Was sieht er da? Wie nimmt er Wotan oder Odin wahr? Als was erkennt er ihn, und als was lernt er ihn lieben und, vor allen Dingen, als was verstehen? Er lernt ihn erkennen als einen derjenigen Erzengel, die dazu gekommen sind, einmal Verzicht zu leisten auf den Aufstieg zu höheren Stufen. Er lernt Odin als einen der abnormen Erzengel kennen, als einen der großen Verzichter der Vorzeit, die das Erzengeltum übernommen hatten, als sie die wichtige Mission auf sich nahmen, in die Seele des Menschen hineinzuarbeiten. Den Odin in seiner Tätigkeit erlebt der germanisch-nordische Mensch noch in der Zeit, in der er an das Werk herangeht, der Seele die Sprache einzuimpfen. In wunderbarer Weise hat sich erhalten, wie Odin selbst an seinen Völkern arbeitet, um ihnen die Sprache möglich zu machen. Das wird geschildert als eine Götter-Einweihung. Wie Odin dazu kam, sich die Macht zu verschaffen, den Seelen der germanisch-nordischen Völker die Sprache zu verleihen, das wird dadurch geschildert, daß Odin, bevor er diese Fähigkeit erlangt hatte, dasjenige durchmacht, was uns als die Einweihung durch den Göttertrank dargestellt wird, den Göttertrank, der einstmals in urferner Vergangenheit bei den Riesen war. Dieser Trank enthielt nicht bloß eine abstrakte Weisheit, sondern stellt uns die unmittelbar im Laut sich auslebende Weisheit dar. Über die im Laute sich auslebende Weisheit erringt Odin bei seiner Einweihung die Macht; er lernt sie handhaben, als er eine lange Einweihung, eine Einweihung von neun Tagen durchmacht, aus der er dann durch Mimir, den alten Träger der Weisheit, erlöst wird. So wird Odin der Herr der Sprachgewalt. Daher führt die spätere Sage die Sprache der Dichter, die Sprache der Skalden auf Odin zurück. Auf Odin wird auch zurückgeführt die Runenkunde, die in alten Zeiten mit der Sprache viel näher verwandt gedacht wurde als das spätere Schrifttum. Wie also die Seele auf dem Umwege durch den Atherleib und hineinlebend in den physischen Leib durch den entsprechenden Erzengel die Sprache erwirbt, das drückt sich aus in den wunderbaren Geschichten, die über Odin erzählt werden.

Ähnliche Erzengelwesen haben wir in den Genossen des Odin vor uns, in Hönir, welcher die Kraft des Vorstellens verleiht und in Lodur, welcher dasjenige verleiht, was der Rasse noch am nächsten liegt, also Hautfarbe und Blutcharakter. In diesen zwei Wesen haben wir also Erzengelwesen zu sehen, die sozusagen mehr nach der normalen Seite hin liegen. Die abnormen haben wir dann in den Wesen zu erkennen, die als Wili und We auftreten. Das sind Wesenheiten, die mehr noch im Innern, im Intimen der Seele wirken, wie ich es im vergangenen Vortrage klargelegt habe. Aber innig verwandt fühlt sich gerade mit einem abnormen Erzengel ein solches Ich, das selbst auf einer abnormen Entwickelungsstufe steht, wo es schon bei der Heranbildung der untergeordneten Seelenkräfte dabei ist. Ein solches Ich fühlt sich verwandt mit einem abnorm entwickelten Erzengelwesen. Daher wird auch Odin nicht als abnormer Erzengel empfunden, vielmehr als solcher, der in seinem Zurückbleiben verwandt ist mit dem Zurückbleiben der westländischen Seelen, die in mehr bewußter Weise das in ihrem Ich erleben, was beim Durchgang durch jene Gebiete zurückgeblieben ist, wogegen die östlichen Seelen an gewissen Stadien des Seelenlebens vorübergingen, bis sie sich entschlossen, zu erwachen. Daher lebt vor allen Dingen in der Seele der germanisch-nordischen Menschen alles dasjenige, was mit diesen in den elementaren Tiefen des Seelenlebens wühlenden und arbeitenden Erzengelkräften des Odin verbunden ist.

Wenn wir gesagt haben, daß die Engel es sind, welche dasjenige, was die Erzengel bewirken, in die einzelnen Menschen heruntertragen, so hat ein Ich, das auf einer so frühen Elementarstufe des Seelenlebens erwacht, vor allen Dingen ein Interesse daran, daß in jenes Ich gleichsam die Angelegenheiten der Erzengel hineingetragen werden. Daher hat der germanisch-nordische Mensch ein Interesse an einer solchen Engelgestalt, welche von besonderer Macht ist, aber zu gleicher Zeit innig verwandt ist mit dem einzelnen Menschen und seiner Individualität. Das ist Thor. Thor wird nur dadurch erkannt, daß man weiß, daß in ihm gesehen werden muß eine Wesenheit, die zwar sehr vorgerückt sein könnte, wenn sie normal sich weiter entwickelt hätte, die aber verhältnismäßig früh verzichtet hat und auf der Stufe der Engel zurückgeblieben ist, damit sie in der Zeit, da das Ich in der Seelenentwikkelung erwachte, Führer in der Seelenwelt der germanisch-nordischen Gebiete sein konnte. Daß dasjenige, was aus der geistigen Welt in jedes einzelne Ich hineingetragen werden sollte, auch hineingetragen werden konnte, das ist es, was in Thor als verwandt mit dem einzelnen menschlichen Ich so unmittelbar empfunden wird. Wenn wir dies ins Auge fassen, dann werden wir das, was an Einzelheiten überliefert ist, auch besser verstehen. Bei uns handelt es sich ja darum, diese Götterindividualitäten in entsprechender Weise verstehen zu können. Nun aber hat der germanisch-nordische Mensch empfunden, miterlebt dieses Einprägen der Seele in die Leiblichkeit. Er war dabei, als das Ich sich in die Leiblichkeit hineingliederte und von jedem einzelnen Menschen Besitz ergriff.

Nun wissen wir, daß das Ich im Blute des physischen Leibes pulsiert, und es entspricht jedem Inneren ein Äußeres, jedem Mikrokosmischen ein Makrokosmisches. Der Arbeit des Sprachen- und Runenweisheit gebenden Odin, der auf einem weiten Umweg durch das Atmen wirkte, entspricht draußen im Makrokosmos die Windesbewegung. Dem regelmäßigen Eindringen der Luft durch unsere Atmungsorgane, welche die Umformung der Luft zu dem Wort, der Sprache bewirken, dem entsprechen draußen im Makrokosmos die Bewegungen, die Strömungen im Winde. Ebenso wahr, wie wir das Walten des Odin in der Umgestaltung der Luft zu den Worten in uns selber empfinden, ebenso wahr müssen wir ihn draußen im Winde walten und wirken sehen. Das aber hat derjenige, der noch die alten germanisch-nordischen Fähigkeiten besaß, zu denen besonders ein gewisser Grad von Hellsichtigkeit gehörte, wirklich gesehen. Der hat überall Odin im Weltenwind walten gesehen, hat ihn gesehen, wie er durch seinen Atem die Sprache formte. Das sah der nordische Mensch als eine Einheit. So wie das, was in uns lebt und die Sprache organisiert — das heißt so, wie bei der nordischen Organisation die Sprache war —, hindurchdringt in das Ich und die Pulsation des Blutes bewirkt, so entspricht dem, was sich da als Sprache hineinorganisiert, draußen im Makrokosmos der Blitz und der Donner. Die Sprache ist eher da, als das Ich geboren ist. Daher wird das Ich überall als der Sohn derjenigen Wesenheit empfunden, welche die Sprache gibt. An der Einprägung in das einzelne Ich ist insbesondere Thor beteiligt, und was dem Vorgange im Makrokosmos entspricht, ist im Mikrokosmos die Pulsation des Blutes. Was also draußen im Makrokosmos der Pulsation des Blutes im Menschen entspricht, das ist dasjenige, was als Blitz und Donner durch die wehenden Winde und webenden Wolken geht. Das aber sieht wiederum der germanisch-nordische Mensch in seinem Hellsehen als eine Einheit, und er sieht das Wehen des Windes, das Zucken des Blitzes draußen in innigem Zusammenhang mit dem Weben der von ihm eingeatmeten Luft. Er sieht, wie sie ins Blut übergeht und da das Ich pulsieren macht. Das wird heute als ein materieller Vorgang angesehen, war aber noch ein astralischer Vorgang bei den germanisch-nordischen Menschen. Der sah die innige Verwandtschaft des Feuers, des Blitzes mit dem, was durch das Blut geht. Er fühlte den Pulsschlag in seinem Blute und wußte: Das ist der Schlag des Ich; wußte: Das, was da schlägt, spüre ich und spüre ich nach einiger Zeit wieder. Aber den äußeren, materiellen Vorgang beachtete er nicht. Das alles war in hellseherische Empfindung gekleidet. Er empfand das, was den Pulsschlag bewirkt und ihn immer wieder an dieselbe Stelle zurückgehen läßt, als Thors Tat. Als das Immer-wiederZurückkehren des Hammers des Thor in die Hand des Thor fühlte er in seinem Ich die Thor-Kraft, die Kraft eines der mächtigsten Engel, die überhaupt jemals verehrt worden sind, weil er eine mächtige Wesenheit war, die angesehen wurde als stehengeblieben auf der Stufe des Engeltums.

Wie die geistige Kraft den physischen Leib zusammenhält, das drückt sich in der germanisch-nordischen Mythologie dadurch aus, daß das Ich dasjenige ist, was bei dem Gesponnen werden des seelisch-leiblichen Wesens dieses zusammenhält. Von innen heraus sieht der germanischnordische Mensch das Weben des leiblich-seelischen Menschen, und er hat in späterer Zeit noch Verständnis dafür, wie aus dem Astralischen sich sein Inneres hineingliedert, wie sozusagen das Innere dem Äußeren antwortet. Er hatte noch Verständnis dafür, wenn ihm von Eingeweihten gesagt wurde, wie die Welt zum Menschen sich formt. Da hatte er Verständnis dafür, zurückzugehen zu den früheren Stadien, zu dem, was ihm erzählt worden ist von den Geschehnissen, die das Verhältnis der Engel und Erzengel darstellen, zu den früheren Stadien, wo der Mensch aus dem Makrokosmos in physisch-geistiger Art herausgeboren worden ist. Er vermochte zu sehen, wie aus dem Makrokosmos der einzelne Mensch herausgebaut wird, wie er im Makrokosmos ruht. Er suchte sich im Makrokosmos diejenigen Vorgänge auf, die sich mikrokosmisch so abspielen, daß von dem menschlichen Norden aus, aus dem kühlen Geistgebiet, die menschlichen Gedanken gewoben werden, und daß von dort aus die menschliche Leiblichkeit mit den zwölf Gehirnnerven des Kopfes versorgt wird. Diesen Vorgang, der mikrokosmisch zu den zwölf Gehirnnerven geworden ist, sieht er. Er sieht den webenden Geist in dem, was er «Nebelheim» oder «Niflheim» nennt; er sieht die zwölf Ströme, die sich zusammenziehen und materiell werden in den zwölf Gehirnnerven des Menschen; er sieht, wie entgegengewirkt dem, was von oben herunterkommt, dasjenige, was aus dem Herzen, aus dem menschlichen Süden kommt; er sucht es im Makrokosmos draußen und versteht es, wenn es ihm als «Muspelheim» genannt wird. So hat er noch in christlichen Jahrhunderten ein Verständnis für das Begreifen des Mikrokosmos aus dem ganzen Makrokosmos heraus, und man kann für ihn noch weiter zurückgehen, indem man den Menschen nach und nach aus dem Makrokosmos, als Extrakt der ganzen Welt, entstehen läßt. Er ist imstande, zurückzublicken in diese Zeit, und kann verstehen, daß diese Vorgänge eine Vergangenheit haben, welche er selber noch sieht als ein Hineinarbeiten der Engel und Erzengel in seine Seele. Er kann einsehen, daß diese Vorgänge eine Vergangenheit haben, und was er sich da als Vorstellungen erwirbt, das ist das, was uns entgegentritt, was erkannt wird als die altgermanisch-nordische Genesis, als die Entstehung der Menschheit aus dem gesamten Makrokosmos heraus.

Da, wo angefangen wird bei dem germanisch-nordischen Chaos, bei dem Ginnungagap, mit dem stehen wir ungefähr da, wo die Erde sich wieder von neuem bildet, nachdem sie die drei früheren Zustände, Saturn-, Sonnen- und Mondzustand, durchgemacht hat, wo die Erde sich also aus dem Pralaya wieder heraushebt, wo die Reiche der Natur sich noch nicht differenziert haben, wo die Menschen noch ganz geistige Wesen sind. Da versteht der nordische Mensch dann, wie sich herausbilden die späteren Zustände.

Und nun ist es interessant zu sehen, wie in der nordisch-germanischen Mythologie in Bildern imaginativer Form die Vorgänge geschildert werden, die sich in jenen Zeiten abgespielt haben, und für die wir in den geisteswissenschaftlichen Lehren nur reifere Ausdrücke, Begriffe statt der früheren Bilder gebrauchen. Es werden geschildert die Vorgänge, die stattfanden, als noch Sonne und Mond verbunden waren. Es wird uns das Hinausgehen des Mondes geschildert und wie dann die Entwickelung übergeht in dasjenige, was später zum «Riesenheim» wird. Es wird uns geschildert alles das, was während der atlantischen Zeit gewesen ist, als Fortsetzung von dem, was früher geschehen war und was eigene Angelegenheiten des germanisch-nordischen Volkes darstellte.

Für heute wollte ich nur einen Begriff davon hervorrufen, wie das nordische Ich erwacht ist, als es noch auf einer niederen Stufe der Entwickelung stand, wie der nordische Mensch hineinsah in die Volksseele, in die Seele des Thor und so weiter. Ich wollte ein Gefühl dafür hervorrufen, wie das Ich dabei war, wie es ein unmittelbares Interesse gewinnen konnte für das Hineinweben auch höherer Wesenheiten, welche aber von einer ganz anderen Seite her kamen als die Wesenheiten, die wir bei den östlichen Völkerschaften finden.

Morgen wollen wir versuchen, den Zugang zu finden zu den entlegeneren Teilen der germanischen Mythologie. Wir werden erkennen, wie diese entlegenen Teile Vorboten sind für das, was in den Volksseelen lebt, und wir werden sehen, welches die Natur gerade dieser unserer westlichen Volksseelen ist.

Eighth Lecture

If one wishes to study the development of Germanic-Nordic history and the spiritual impulses described therein, one must first consider the fundamental character of Germanic-Nordic mythology. It has already been pointed out that, despite certain similarities with other mythologies and conceptions of the gods, this Germanic-Nordic mythology it is nevertheless something quite unique. It remains true, however, that a very extensive core of mythological beliefs extends across all Germanic peoples and tribes of Europe, so that even far to the south, a uniform mythological view, and basically a similar understanding of those family relationships, is possible. Precisely because of the peculiarity of Germanic-Nordic mythology, there must once have been a common understanding throughout all the areas where this mythology was widespread in one form or another; for what is common in the mythology of the Germanic-Nordic peoples differs enormously from the essence of Greek mythology, not to mention Egyptian mythology, so that everything related in Germanic mythology is very close to each other and far removed from what is essential in Greek and Roman mythology. However, it is not easy to understand this essence today, not because of the prerequisites for knowledge — which would take us too far afield to discuss here — but because there is a certain longing, a certain urge to simply compare the religions of different peoples. Comparative religious studies and comparative mythology are subjects that are met with great enthusiasm today. This is an area where it is possible to commit the greatest nonsense. What usually happens when one compares the mythologies and religions of different peoples? One compares the external features of the stories about the gods, seeking to prove that one god figure appears in one mythology and in a similar form in another, and so on. For those who really know the facts, this comparison of religions is pretty much the most uncomfortable thing in our current scientific approach, because you're really just comparing the outward appearances. To someone who knows the facts, this kind of comparison of religions is kind of like someone saying, “Thirty years ago, I met a guy. He wore a uniform that was like this and like that. The man had blue trousers, a red coat, and this or that headgear, and so on,” and then quickly continues: ”Then, twenty years ago, I met a person who wore the same uniform, and ten years ago, another who wore the same uniform again.” If the person in question now believed that the people he met thirty years ago, twenty years ago, and ten years ago could be compared in terms of their essence because they wore the same uniform, he would be very much mistaken; for it may be a completely different person in the uniform at different times, and what essentially matters is what kind of person is in the uniform. The analogy seems far-fetched, and yet it amounts to the same thing in the comparison of religions when one takes Adonis and compares him with Christ. One is only comparing the outer uniform. The clothing and characteristics of the beings in the legends may be very similar or the same, but what matters is what spiritual-divine individualities are within them, and if these are completely different individualities that are within Adonis and Christ, then this comparison has only the value of a comparison of uniforms. Nevertheless, this comparison is extremely popular today. So it is often completely irrelevant what comparative religious studies can bring to light in this field with its entirely external methods. What is much more important is to learn, as it were, from the differentiation of the folk spirits, how this or that people came to its mythology, its other teachings about the gods, or even its philosophy.

We can therefore hardly understand the basic character of Germanic-Nordic mythology other than by taking another brief tour through the five successive cultural periods of the post-Atlantean era. These five cultural periods were brought about by migrations from west to east, whereby the most mature and advanced people, so to speak, advanced into the Indian region after completing these migrations and then founded the sacred ancient Indian culture. Further up, closer to our time, the Persian culture was established, then the Egyptian-Chaldean-Babylonian culture, then the Greek-Latin culture, which is finally followed by our own. These five cultures can only be understood in their essence if one knows that the people who participated in these cultures, as well as the angelic beings, the folk souls or archangels, and the spirits of the times in past ages, were all completely different from one another. Today we want to take more account of how different the people who participated in these cultures were.

The people who founded the ancient Indian culture in ancient India, which then found its literary expression in the Vedas and later Indian literature, were fundamentally different from the Greek-Latin peoples, for example, different from the Persians, different from the Egyptian-Chaldean peoples, and most different from the peoples who were growing in Europe in preparation for the fifth cultural period of the post-Atlantean era. But in what ways were they different? The entire human constitution of the ancient Indian peoples was completely different from that of the peoples living further west. If we want to form an idea of the difference that existed, we must say to ourselves: the peoples of ancient India were very far advanced in human development before they took up the I. They had made great, enormous progress in relation to everything else in human development; they had a long, long human development behind them. But they had gone through this in a kind of dullness, so to speak. Then the “I,” the consciousness of the I, came in. This came relatively late among the Indian people, at a time when the Indian people were already quite mature to a certain degree, when they had already gone through what the Germanic-Nordic peoples still had to go through, while they already possessed their I. — Consider this carefully! The Germanic-Nordic peoples, with their fully developed ego, had to be present at what the inhabitants of ancient India had gone through in a certain dullness, that is, without their ego being present.

What, then, is it that could be experienced in the post-Atlantean era as human evolution? When one lived as a human being in the ancient Atlantean era, one was still endowed with a higher degree of ancient, dull clairvoyance. Through ancient, dull clairvoyance, one saw into the divine-spiritual world; one saw the processes taking place in this world. Now transport yourself for a moment to the ancient Atlantean land before the lines moved eastward. The air was still filled with water vapor and mist. But the souls of the people were also different. Human beings did not even distinguish between the various external sensory perceptions. At that time, they found the spiritual content of the world spreading around them like a spiritual aroma, like a spiritual aura. A certain clairvoyance was therefore present, and it was necessary to emerge from this clairvoyance. This happened through the influence of the forces that people came into contact with during their migrations from west to east. During these migrations, the most diverse soul developments were experienced once again. There were peoples who, in migrating to the East, first seemed to sleep through the emergence from the old clairvoyance and were already at a higher stage of development than their ego, which was still in a state of dullness. They went through various stages of development, and their ego was still dull and dreamy. The Indians were the most developed when their ego awoke with full self-consciousness. They had already reached a stage where they had a very rich inner soul life that no longer showed the conditions that the peoples of Europe still experienced for a long time. They had already gone through this. They awoke to self-consciousness when they were already equipped with spiritual powers and abilities that enabled them to penetrate deeply into the spiritual worlds. Therefore, as the advanced members of the Indian population emerged from their old, dimly perceptive states, they became fundamentally indifferent to all the activity and bustle of the various angelic and archangelic beings around human souls. They no longer directly observed the work of the archangels and angels and of those spiritual beings who worked especially in the folk spirit. This had been accomplished in their souls, in their astral and etheric bodies, when they were, so to speak, not yet present. They awoke when their souls had already attained an enormous degree of maturity; they awoke in such a way that the most advanced among them could already read what had happened earlier in human evolution through a slight development in the Akashic Records, so that they looked out into their surroundings, into the world, and were thus able to read in the Akashic Records what was happening in the spiritual world, what they had gone through in a dull, dim state of consciousness. They had been unconsciously guided into higher realms; before their ego-consciousness had awakened, they had acquired spiritual abilities that were much richer than the soul abilities of the Western peoples. Thus, the spiritual world was an immediate observation for these people. The most advanced among the Indian leaders had progressed so far that when their ego awakened, they were no longer even dependent on observing how human development, so to speak, bubbled up from the spirits of form or forces. Instead, they were more familiar with what we call spirits of movement, powers, and what is above them, the spirits of wisdom. This interested them particularly. The spiritual beings below them, on the other hand, were beings in whose realm they had already been before, and who were therefore no longer of such special importance to them. Thus they looked up to what they later called the sum of all spirits of movement and all spirits of wisdom; to what was later designated by the Greek terms dynameis and kyriotetes. They looked up to these and said to them: MulaPrakriti, that is the sum of the spirits of movement, and Maha-Purusha, the entire sum of the spirits of wisdom, which lives as if in a spiritual unity. They were able to gain such insights because the members of this people awakened to their ego in such late stages of development. They had already decided what later peoples would still have to contemplate with their ego.

Less developed were the peoples of the Persian culture. They were so far along in their peculiar faculty of cognition and in the awakening of their ego at a lower stage that they could occupy themselves with the beings of the forces or spirits of form. They became particularly familiar with these. They saw through them in a certain way and were also particularly interested in them. One step lower than the Indians, but still at a level to which the peoples of the West had to work their way up again, the peoples of the Persian communities awoke. They therefore became acquainted with the forces or spirits of form, which they summarized under the concept of “Amshaspands.” These are the “emanations” that we know as the spirits of form or powers and which, from their point of view, the peoples of the Persian culture were particularly well able to observe.

Then we come to the Chaldean peoples. They already had an awareness of what we know as primal forces, as guiding spirits of the times. They had an awareness of the beings that are to be understood as primal forces, as spirits of personality. In a different way, the peoples of the Greek-Latin period also had a certain awareness of these primal forces or spirits of personality. But they had something else as well, something that could lead us a step further in our understanding. The Greeks were even closer to the Germanic peoples. But there the ego awakened at a higher level than among the Germanic-Nordic peoples. What was still experienced by the Nordic peoples as the work of angels and archangels was no longer experienced directly by the Greco-Latin peoples. However, they still had a clear memory of it. So imagine that the difference between the Germanic and the Greek-Latin peoples is that the Greek-Latin peoples still had a memory of how the angels and archangels participated in the soul life they had developed within themselves. But they had not really gone through this very clearly. They were still in a dull state of consciousness. But now, in their memory, it came back to them very vividly. The Greeks knew about the creation of this whole world, the way in which angels and archangels — both abnormal and normal — work within the human soul. What they had gone through was stored in their souls as a powerful image of memory. Memory is something that is more refined and has firmer contours than what one experiences. It is no longer so fresh and young, but it has sharper outlines and contours, which appear as memory. The influence or impulse of the world of angels and archangels on the human soul was evoked in the Greeks from memory in fixed, sharp contours. That is Greek mythology. Those who do not see it this way, but only compare the names with names that appear elsewhere, that is, who do not grasp the special powers, who do not perceive the figures that appear as Apollo, Minerva, and so on, are engaging in external religious comparison, merely comparing uniforms. The way things were viewed at that time is what matters.

Having seen this, we will admit that the Greeks formed their mythology out of memory. The Egyptian-Chaldean period had only a dark, dim memory of the workings of the angelic and archangelic world, but a glimpse into the world of the primordial forces. It is as if it were beginning to forget something. In Persian mythology or theology, we find a complete forgetting of the world of angels and archangels, but at the same time a glimpse into the world of forces or spirits of form. What lies in Greek mythology has been forgotten by the Persian peoples and even more so by the Indian peoples. They looked back at all the events from the Akashic Records and created images of earlier events from their knowledge, which was, however, already a deified knowledge with more highly developed spiritual powers. From this you will also recognize that it is extremely difficult for the peoples of the East to understand Western spiritual life. This is the reason for the reticence of the peoples of the East toward Western spiritual life. They will certainly adopt the material culture of the West, but the spiritual culture of the West will remain more or less closed to them unless they arrive at it by way of spiritual science. They were already on a high human level at the time when Christ Jesus was not yet on earth. He only came in the fourth post-Atlantean cultural epoch. This is an event that could no longer be grasped with the forces that had developed out of Indian folklore. For this, forces were needed that were related to a less elevated state of the ego, with the ego standing within subordinate soul forces.

In the Germanic-Nordic regions, the working of the angeloi and archangeloi into the human soul was not merely present as a memory, but in such a way that people, even at the time when Christ Jesus was walking on Earth, could still see that they were still standing in it, that they were participating in the affairs of the angelic and archangelic beings as they were still working in their souls. The Greek-Latin peoples remembered something they had once experienced in these soul experiences.

The Germanic peoples lived in them as in their own immediate affairs. Their ego had awakened at the stage of existence where the folk spirits and those spiritual beings who themselves still stand below the folk spirits were still working into the soul. Therefore, these peoples were closest to what we know as the events in ancient Atlantis.

In ancient Atlantis, people looked up to spiritual powers and spoke of a kind of unified deity, because they looked up in direct perception to ancient, primeval states of human development. At that time, people still saw, as it were, the working of the spirits of wisdom and the working of the spirits of movement, which the later Indians observed again from the Akashic Chronicle. The peoples of the West had risen one step above this point of view, so that they experienced the emergence from the old view into the new in their immediate presence. They saw the weaving and life of real spiritual powers at a time when the ego had not yet awakened. But at the same time they saw how the ego gradually awakened and how angelic beings and archangelic beings intervened in the soul. They perceived this immediate transition. They had a memory of an earlier weaving and living when the view was still such that one saw everything as if in a sea of mist, and they saw how then, out of this sea of mist, emerged for them what we have come to know as the divine-spiritual forms that stand immediately above human beings. But the ancient gods who had worked before the gods we now saw and felt connected to intervened in human soul life, these divine beings who were active in the distant, distant past, in the time of ancient Atlantis, were called the Vanir. Then humans emerged from the ancient Atlantean era and looked upon the weaving of the angels and archangels; these were called the Aesir. These were the beings who, as angels and archangels, cared for the human ego, which was now awakening on the lowest level. They were superior to those peoples. What the other peoples of the East had slept through, namely seeing how the soul works its way up through the various forces bestowed by normal and abnormal angelic and archangelic beings, the peoples of Europe had to go through from the bottom up; they had to be fully involved so that these soul forces could gradually develop.

Thus, the god-figures that stood, so to speak, before the soul of the Germanic-Nordic human being, the god-figures that worked directly on his soul and what he himself observed as the struggle of the human soul out of the cosmic, were direct perceptions; this was something he experienced directly. They did not look back in memory to see how souls had formed themselves into bodies; rather, they saw what was happening as if it were happening in the present. It was their own development, and they were involved in it with their egos. They understood this up until the eighth, ninth, and tenth centuries AD. He has retained an understanding of how the soul forces gradually form and crystallize into the body. First, he looks at the archangel beings who worked in his soul by giving him what his soul forces were to become, and there he finds Wotan or Odin as the most outstanding of these archangels and sees him working on his soul, sees how he works into his soul. What does he see there? How does he perceive Wotan or Odin? How does he recognize him, and how does he learn to love him and, above all, understand him? He learns to recognize him as one of those archangels who came to renounce their ascent to higher levels. He gets to know Odin as one of the abnormal archangels, one of the great renunciants of ancient times who took on the archangelhood when they undertook the important mission of working into the soul of man. The Germanic-Nordic man still experiences Odin in his activity at the time when he approaches the work of instilling language into the soul. How Odin himself works on his peoples to make language possible for them has been wonderfully preserved. This is described as a divine initiation. How Odin came to acquire the power to give language to the souls of the Germanic-Nordic peoples is described by the fact that, before he attained this ability, Odin underwent what is presented to us as the initiation through the drink of the gods, the drink of the gods that once belonged to the giants in the distant past. This drink contained not only abstract wisdom, but also represents wisdom that is directly expressed in sound. Through the wisdom expressed in sound, Odin gains power during his initiation; he learns to wield it when he undergoes a long initiation, an initiation lasting nine days, from which he is then redeemed by Mimir, the ancient bearer of wisdom. Thus Odin becomes the lord of eloquence. Hence, later legends trace the language of poets, the language of the skalds, back to Odin. The knowledge of runes, which in ancient times was thought to be much more closely related to language than later writing, is also traced back to Odin. How the soul acquires language through the corresponding archangel on its detour through the etheric body and into the physical body is expressed in the wonderful stories told about Odin.

We have similar archangel beings in Odin's companions, in Hönir, who bestows the power of imagination, and in Lodur, who bestows what is closest to the race, namely skin color and blood character. In these two beings, we therefore see archangel beings who are, so to speak, closer to the normal side. We then recognize the abnormal ones in the beings who appear as Wili and We. These are beings who work even more within, in the intimacy of the soul, as I explained in the previous lecture. But such an ego, which itself stands at an abnormal stage of development, where it is already involved in the formation of the subordinate soul forces, feels closely related to an abnormal archangel. Such an ego feels related to an abnormally developed archangel being. That is why Odin is not perceived as an abnormal archangel, but rather as one who, in his backwardness, is related to the backwardness of the Western souls, who experience in a more conscious way in their ego what was left behind during their passage through those regions, whereas the Eastern souls passed through certain stages of soul life until they decided to awaken. Therefore, above all, everything connected with the archangelic forces of Odin, which are stirring and working in the elemental depths of the soul life, lives in the soul of the Germanic-Nordic people.

When we say that it is the angels who carry down into individual human beings what the archangels bring about, then an ego that awakens at such an early elemental stage of soul life is primarily interested in having the affairs of the archangels carried into that ego, as it were. Therefore, the Germanic-Nordic human being has an interest in such an angelic figure who is of special power but at the same time intimately related to the individual human being and his individuality. That is Thor. Thor can only be recognized by knowing that he must be seen as a being who, although he could have been very advanced if he had developed normally, renounced this relatively early and remained at the stage of the angels so that he could be a guide in the soul world of the Germanic-Nordic regions at the time when the ego awakened in soul development. That what was to be carried into each individual ego from the spiritual world could also be carried in is what is so immediately felt in Thor as related to the individual human ego. If we take this into account, we will also better understand the details that have been handed down. For us, it is a matter of being able to understand these god-individualities in the appropriate way. Now, however, the Germanic-Nordic human being felt and experienced this imprinting of the soul into the physical body. He was present when the ego integrated itself into the physical body and took possession of each individual human being.

Now we know that the I pulsates in the blood of the physical body, and that every inner aspect corresponds to an outer aspect, every microcosmic aspect to a macrocosmic aspect. The work of Odin, who imparted the wisdom of language and runes and worked through the breath in a long roundabout way, corresponds to the movement of the wind outside in the macrocosm. The regular penetration of air through our respiratory organs, which causes the transformation of air into words and language, corresponds to the movements and currents in the wind outside in the macrocosm. Just as we feel Odin's influence in the transformation of air into words within ourselves, so must we see him influencing and working outside in the wind. But those who still possessed the ancient Germanic-Nordic abilities, which included a certain degree of clairvoyance, really saw this. They saw Odin ruling everywhere in the world wind, they saw him forming language through his breath. The Norse man saw this as a unity. Just as that which lives within us and organizes language—that is, as language was in the Norse organization—penetrates the I and causes the pulsation of the blood, so what organizes itself as language corresponds to lightning and thunder outside in the macrocosm. Language is there before the I is born. Therefore, the ego is perceived everywhere as the son of the entity that gives language. Thor is particularly involved in imprinting this on the individual ego, and what corresponds to the process in the macrocosm is the pulsation of the blood in the microcosm. What corresponds to the pulsation of the blood in humans in the macrocosm is what passes through the blowing winds and weaving clouds as lightning and thunder. The Germanic-Nordic person, however, sees this as a unity in their clairvoyance, and they see the blowing of the wind and the flashing of lightning outside as intimately connected with the weaving of the air they breathe in. They see how it passes into the blood and causes the I to pulsate there. Today this is regarded as a material process, but for the Germanic-Nordic people it was still an astral process. They saw the intimate relationship between fire, lightning, and what passes through the blood. They felt the pulse beating in their blood and knew: this is the beating of the I; they knew: what beats there, I feel, and after a while I feel it again. But they did not pay attention to the external, material process. All this was clothed in clairvoyant perception. He perceived what causes the pulse to beat and makes it return to the same place again and again as the deed of Thor. As the hammer of Thor returned again and again to Thor's hand, he felt in his ego the power of Thor, the power of one of the most powerful angels ever worshipped, because he was a powerful being who was regarded as having remained at the level of angelhood.

The way spiritual power holds the physical body together is expressed in Germanic-Norse mythology by the fact that the ego is what holds the soul-body together when it is spun. From within, the Germanic-Nordic human being sees the weaving of the physical-soul human being, and in later times he still has an understanding of how the astral is integrated into his inner being, how the inner responds to the outer, so to speak. He still had an understanding when initiates told him how the world is formed for human beings. They were able to understand how to go back to earlier stages, to what they had been told about the events that represent the relationship between angels and archangels, to earlier stages when humans were born out of the macrocosm in a physical-spiritual way. They were able to see how the individual human being is built out of the macrocosm, how they rest in the macrocosm. He sought out those processes in the macrocosm that take place microcosmically in such a way that human thoughts are woven from the human north, from the cool realm of the spirit, and that from there the human body is supplied with the twelve cranial nerves of the head. He sees this process, which has become microcosmic in the twelve brain nerves. He sees the weaving spirit in what he calls “Nebelheim” or “Niflheim.” ; he sees the twelve streams that converge and become material in the twelve brain nerves of the human being; he sees how, counteracting what comes down from above, there is that which comes from the heart, from the human south; he seeks it in the macrocosm outside and understands it when it is called “Muspelheim.” Thus, even in Christian centuries, he still has an understanding of the microcosm from the whole macrocosm, and one can go back even further for him by gradually allowing the human being to emerge from the macrocosm as an extract of the whole world. He is able to look back to this time and understand that these processes have a past, which he himself still sees as the work of angels and archangels in his soul. He can see that these processes have a past, and what he acquires as ideas is what confronts us, what is recognized as the ancient Germanic-Nordic Genesis, as the emergence of humanity from the entire macrocosm.

Where it begins with the Germanic-Nordic chaos, with the Ginnungagap, that is roughly where we stand, where the earth is forming anew after passing through the three previous states, Saturn, Sun, and Moon, where the earth is rising out of the Pralaya, where the realms of nature have not yet differentiated, where human beings are still entirely spiritual beings. The Nordic human being then understands how the later states develop.

And now it is interesting to see how, in Nordic-Germanic mythology, the events that took place in those times are described in imaginative images, for which we use only more mature expressions and concepts instead of the earlier images in spiritual scientific teachings. The events that took place when the sun and moon were still connected are described. We are told about the departure of the moon and how development then transitions into what later becomes the “home of the giants.” We are told about everything that happened during the Atlantean era as a continuation of what had happened earlier and which represented the specific affairs of the Germanic-Nordic people.

For today, I only wanted to give you an idea of how the Nordic ego awakened when it was still at a lower stage of development, how the Nordic human being looked into the soul of the people, into the soul of Thor, and so on. I wanted to evoke a feeling of how the ego was in the process of gaining a direct interest in the interweaving of higher beings, who, however, came from a completely different side than the beings we find among the Eastern peoples.

Tomorrow we will try to find access to the more remote parts of Germanic mythology. We will recognize how these remote parts are harbingers of what lives in the souls of the people, and we will see what the nature of our Western souls is.