Central Europe between East and West
GA 174a
18 March 1916, Munich
Translated by Anna Meuss and Johanna Collis
Slightly abridged translation originally published in the 1991 edition of the Golden Blade.
On many occasions when I have spoken of human evolution I have pointed out that during the fifth post-Atlantean epoch, in which we live, the task is to develop the consciousness soul out of the general human potential. During the sixth post-Atlantean epoch the Spirit Self will have to evolve. I have pointed out that if the sixth post-Atlantean epoch is to come into its own in that evolution, a major role will have to be played by specific human faculties that are to be found in the Eastern part of Europe, in the Russian people, though at present these still lie dormant. That evolution will depend on certain qualities that need to be so deeply rooted in the Russian folk soul that the souls of individual members of that nation—unless led astray by their ‘intelligentsia’—are profoundly illumined by these qualities. We should take note of those qualities. The Russian folk soul has something almost feminine about it, a compliance, something that makes it easy to accept what the process of civilisation brings with it.
One aspect of this is that in the course of their evolution the Russian people have always been receptive to Byzantine religious elements with their more oriental flavour, elements that have come to be part of their culture. Until now the Russian folk soul has been neither productive nor inwardly creative, but it has been enormously receptive. That is also why the Russian Orthodox faith cannot really be said to have shown progressive development in the centuries during which this Russian faith with its Byzantine orientation has been alive among the Russian people. When you attend one of the ceremonies of the Russian church—even if only briefly—you can sense the strong oriental aura present in those ceremonies; something of an auric element is tangibly brought right into the present time.
That is one aspect. Another is that the nature of the Russian folk soul is such that individual Russians have little feeling for the thought forms that in Western and Central Europe have become a necessity in order to structure social life and develop it further. One of those necessities has been to make strictly legal thinking part of the social order in Europe. Russians, however, have little understanding for a social life that owes its inner structure to thought forms. They would feel that this interfered with their freedom to live out their destinies both with and through their feelings. They do not wish to be side-tracked by thought forms of any kind that are woven into the outer social structure.
A third element is intimately bound up with what we may call the Russian folk soul. This trait is one of peacefulness and non-aggression in the life of the spirit, a passive nature that is more inclined to yield. Aggressive protagonism of any kind of dogma is alien to Russian folk nature. This, then, is their third trait.
It is of course possible for such character traits to change into their opposites if circumstances arise that make this happen—that is inevitable considering the complexity of human life. Thanks to those who are now leading the people astray, the three traits have almost completely turned into their absolute opposites, something that should not surprise anyone who is working out of the science of the spirit.
We see, therefore—and we’d see very much more if we were able to study in more detail what can only be given in brief outline here—that the East provides material that as it were has to come together with the fruits of a much more active development in the West of Europe, where we find character traits that are practically the opposite. I have shown what the West has been able to achieve for humanity up to our fifth post-Atlantean era because there has been a certain active development. I have also indicated the things that still have to be achieved for humanity and can be achieved if people do not fail to wake up to things such as I mentioned in yesterday’s lecture, when I gave an example of a note that had been struck in the life of the spirit in Germany but had then been allowed to fade away.
The driving forces within the life of the spirit have to be perceived in an unbiased way even where they appear in the most dreadful distortions and as absolute caricatures in outer physical reality. Those who can do this will know that because of a certain fact it will be necessary for the element that is to be found in the life of the spirit in Central Europe to enter into a form of marriage with the element that comes from the natural traits of the Russian people. The fruits that can be generated through the special nature, of the life in the spirit in Central Europe need to work together with the receptivity that is possible thanks to those purely natural charac-teristics of people in the East of Europe.
If you were to take an even closer look at the Central European life of the spirit, and in particular the trait to which I have just drawn attention in my public lecture, you would see that while it is not yet spiritual science as such, it does have something which is the seed of spiritual science. Fichte1Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814), German philosopher. In the introductory lectures in "Die Wissenschaftslehre" (Berlin 1813). spoke of a ‘higher sense’, Goethe2Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832), German poet, dramatist and scientist. Goethe’s essay on the subject was first published in vol. 1 no.2 of "Die Morphologie". It is in vol. 1 of Goethe’s scientific writings edited by Rudolf Steiner. of ‘the power of intuitive judgement’. Schelling,3Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling (1775–1854), German philosopher. Schelling discussed his ‘intellectual intuition’ in a number of works, e.g. his "Transcendental Idealism" (1800) and in the posthumously published "Fernere Darstellungen aus dem System der Philosophie, ch. 2. Philosophie der Mythologie und Philosophie der Offenbarung", two of the works Steiner mentions in this lecture, were edited by Schelling’s son and published in 1856-61. "Cher die Gouheiten von Samothrake" first appeared in 1915. on the other hand, said that the soul had to attain to a higher level of ‘intellectual intuition’ if it was to gain true insight into the secrets of life. To understand this more clearly we have to take note of the great achievements of Schelling’s old age, when he wrote two extremely profound works—"The Philosophy of Mythology" and "The Philosophy of Revelation". These reveal a profound appreciation of Christianity and are far from understood even today. The world is seen in terms of the spirit in works such as "The Gods of Samothrace", where Schelling seeks to penetrate the mysteries of the Samothracian Cabeiri or Kabiri. Nowhere else in recent philosophy does one find such a marked awareness of the fact that the Christian faith is not a collection of dogmatic statements, that such dogma as there is really only has secondary importance and that the heart of the matter is that the Christ event, the mystery of Golgotha, did occur. Nowhere else is this more strongly represented than in Schelling’s "Philosophy of Revelation". All this is capable of further development and must lead to the development that I have frequently outlined, a necessary development that reveals itself when we reflect on the tasks to be achieved specifically in Central Europe during the fifth post-Atlantean epoch.
And now we come to Western Europe. In considering Western Europe the first thing to be clearly understood is that it is riddled with historical occultism passed on by tradition, an occultism that can never arise from the living reality of outer exoteric life and be as alive and organic as the spiritual stream of which Goethe, Schelling, Hegel4Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831), German idealist philosopher. and so on are part. The occultism of the West has little connection with exoteric science. Thus it would be impossible, for example, to find there the kind of relationship between occult science and exoteric science and philosophy that is to be found in German idealist philosophy. One cannot imagine that outwardly utterly English elements such as Bacon’s5Francis, Baron Verulam of Verulam, Viscount of St Albans (1561–1626), English philosopher and statesman. or Spencer’s6Herbert Spencer (1820–1903), English evolutionary philosopher. philosophies, Darwinism with its English flavour or the more recent school of pragmatism7In philosophy, pragmatism represents aversion of empiricism developed mainly in the USA by C. S. Pierce (1839–1914), William James (1842-1910) and John Dewey (1859–1952); according to it, knowledge has meaning and significance only in so far as it is of practical value. could establish the kind of relationship to what lives in the different secret societies of the West as has been the case in German idealism. The stream that lives in those secret societies has to shut itself off from the world and cannot build any real bridge to exoteric worldly science.
On the other hand those Western societies,8See also Rudolf Steiner’s "The Karma of Untruthfulness", vol. 1 (GA 173), tr. J. Collis; lecture given in Dornach on 4th December 1916. and particularly certain secret societies where they have higher degrees, have a traditional historical knowledge that is acquired by every member. They have some perception, I would say, of the European political situation, the main secret of which is the very fact I have just described—that on the one hand the East of Europe is destined, out of the blood, as it were, to be receptive and on the other hand the regions that lie to the west of the East of Europe are destined to evolve something that is to be received by the East. The leaders of those Western secret societies undoubtedly have this knowledge and they certainly speak of it when they present the basic concept of their occult work and influence.
Something quite specific arises in connection with those basic concepts in the West. We can perceive it most easily if we consider these things where they appear most rigid and set in their ways, which is in the British secret societies. People who have been initiated to certain higher degrees—higher degrees of initiation that they then know as history, but into which they are not really initiated in a living way—have the notion that the Anglo-Saxon folk element should give rise to something that can unite with the Russian folk element in a kind of spiritual and cultural marriage. The people who are part of Anglo-Saxon occultism in the way I have just described consider it to be the role of this occultism to take the place of the deepest occult driving forces of Greek and Roman origin. To their way of thinking, civilisation was shaped by elements that arose from Graeco-Roman culture, including occult elements, during the fourth post-Atlantean epoch, and must be replaced by the Anglo-Saxon element during the fifth post-Atlantean epoch. They see this as a positive necessity that has to be brought to realisation. This dogma, that in the fifth post-Atlantean epoch civilisation has to have an Anglo-Saxon physiognomy and bear the mark of Anglo-Saxon culture, also has a will element to it, and anyone who has made this dogma his own also has a certain image of what the future Europe should look like. The image these people have is that any life of the spirit existing in Central Europe absolutely has to be suppressed and prevented from influencing the future of the human race. To their mind it should be ignored as something of no significance.
This dogma is consciously or to some extent unconsciously followed in all Anglo-Saxon secret societies and consequently also in all secret societies that have any connection with the Grand Orient in France,9French Grand Lodge of the Scottish Grand Order of Freemasonry. for example, and all the secret societies of Western Europe. Thus we have the basic dogma—consciously or more or less unconsciously adhered to—that Central European knowledge cannot and indeed must not be allowed to play a role in fifth post-Atlantean civilisation. Things have to be organised in such a way that the fifth post-Atlantean civilisation has an Anglo-Saxon physiognomy. This calls for a kind of marriage between Western and Eastern Europe, leaving out anything that Central Europe may have to offer.
The war that is now being fought in Europe has been discussed for many, many years in those secret societies, and believe me, it was no less terrible in their imagination than it has now become in reality. It is naive to think that this war came unexpectedly and has not been foreseen and indeed talked about by many, many people. It has been discussed a great deal! You’ll find that the subject of the great European war that was to come has been mentioned and discussed everywhere, repeatedly so, particularly in the Anglo-Saxon secret societies.10See lecture referred to in Note 7. Again and again there have been indications that such a major European conflict was inevitable. And then the future Europe is envisaged. They know that the qualities, the blood qualities, I’d say, of the Russian people have something to do with the sixth post-Atlantean civilisation which in Anglo-Saxon terminology is called, somewhat materialistically, the sixth sub-race, and that the Western European and the Russian elements should therefore be brought together. These things have to be seen quite clearly, otherwise we are asleep in the occult movement of the present time.
Let me mention something to you in this connection, something I have never been able to forget. When Mrs Besant visited us in Europe for the first time11Mrs Annie Besant, née Wood (1847—1933), British theosophist born in London of Irish parents, initially a follower of Bradlaugh’s secularism, went over to theosophy in 1889. Following an invitation from Rudolf Steiner she visited Germany in 1904, giving lectures in a number of German cities. a meeting was organised in Hamburg at which she gave a lecture. On that occasion I put the following question to her "We are now intending to start a Central European occult movement; yet surely significant beginnings of a specifically Central European spiritual life showed themselves earlier, at the beginning of the 19th century, that is, at the turn of the century?". Mrs Besant’s answer was—and there was of course little comprehension of what lay behind it all: "At that time something of an abstract, conceptual form of spiritual knowledge did show itself in Germany; but humanity had no use for it and it had to be developed in a purer, higher and true form later on in English spiritual circles". Some people find it distasteful that I cannot and will not forget characteristic statements of this kind, but I can assure you that they will not be forgotten.
During the last third of the 19th century a particular phenomenon arose that holds very special significance for occult development in Europe and indeed also in America. This phenomenon—outwardly presenting itself in the form of an individual human being—had much greater significance than we are generally inclined to believe. It presented itself in the individual known as Helena Petrovna Blavatsky12Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, née Hahn (1831–91), Russian theosophist. The outer fact—but this extraordinary fact has a deep inner spiritual background—is that Helena Petrovna Blavatsky was born as a Russian and had all the qualities of that nation, but out of this developed tremendous spiritual qualities of a mediumistic nature and above all psychic powers of the highest degree.
You need to have an idea as to what the appearance of such a phenomenon signifies in the occult evolution of humanity if you are to fully appreciate what I am going to say next, for instance. Lively activity developed in the Anglo-Saxon or Western secret societies, etc. when it became known that such a unique individual existed, someone who was capable of distilling qualities belonging to the future of human evolution out of a quite specifically Russian background, producing outstanding psychic powers and a quite unique mediumistic talent. Things were astir everywhere. Life burst forth in those Anglo-Saxon secret societies, posing urgent questions. The vital urgency that arose may be described as follows—though it will be necessary to limit ourselves to certain outlines. The people who are the actual guardians of this Anglo-Saxon Western movement said to themselves: It means something that such an individual comes to life at this moment out of the people in the East; this is something to be taken into account we have to decide what our attitude to it should be. The question now arose as to how this phenomenon, which out of tremendous psychic powers was capable of making certain deep secrets known to the world, could be channelled in a direction where the Russian element relating to the future could be united with the Anglo-Saxon element. The aim was then to channel the gifts of Madame Blavatsky so that they flowed into the Anglo-Saxon element. If nothing else, they hoped to use Madame Blavatsky’s psychic powers in such a way that they revealed to the world primarily the occult dogmas that the Western secret societies wanted to present to the world. The aim was to show that a certain science of the future based on occultism had to come. People’s minds, that are so easily led, were to be guided to advance from the fifth to the sixth epoch, but in such a way that initially they would be filled with the drives that originate in Anglo-Saxon occultism and its dogmas. The psychic personality of Madame Blavatsky was to be used to inculcate the historical, traditional articles of faith of Western occultism.
We could say that at first things went the way they were meant to. Madame Blavatsky was certainly starting to familiarise herself with the occult aspects of the spiritual life of Central Europe. We can get a perfectly clear idea of what this means if we take a closer look at this life of the spirit in Central Europe and its occult elements. The spiritual life of Central Europe has always brought occult elements to the surface, and these can actually be perceived in a particular, even if exoteric, form of literature. It was alive in the 15th, 16th, 17th and even 18th century, until the Jesuits came and outwardly—but only outwardly—ruined everything. It certainly was alive at that time. When we speak today of the way in which a deeper quest was evident in a certain purely ideal form at the time of Goethe, Schelling and Fichte, we have to realise that this deeper quest had its roots in Central European occultism, in a Central European occult development.13Elsewhere referred to as Rosicrucianism by Steiner. Initially, then, things went in the right direction, with Helena Petrovna Blavatsky entering into this stream of Central European occult development, so that to begin with the element which, if I may put it like this, rose up into her psychic life through the subterranean channels of this human personality, received into it the occultism that lived in Central Europe during late Medieval times.
But something else had happened to this Central European occultism at an earlier time. Western occultists are of course far from stupid; in fact, when it comes to what may be perceived as outer intelligence they are extraordinarily intelligent. I won’t include Grey14Edward, 1st Viscount Grey of Fallodon (1862–1933), British statesman, Secretary for Foreign Affairs 1905–16. and Asquith15Herbert Henry, 1st Earl of Oxford and Asquith (1852–1928), British Liberal statesman, Home Secretary 1892–95, Chancellor of the Exchequer 1905–08, Premier 1908–16. among the intelligent, though; I do not want it to be thought that I consider the English statesmen of today intelligent. But there certainly have been truly important individuals particularly within the secret societies, people who above all had great intelligence; thanks to that intelligence it happened that practically everything that it was possible to adopt from Central European occultism has indeed been adopted in England and come to life again in that country in a fairly extensive though exoteric literature.
For anyone who knows the real situation it is perfectly clear, on looking at anything by Wynn Westcott16William Wynn Westcott (d. 1919), member of English Grand Order of Freemasonry and author of works on occultism (pen name: Sapere aude). or by English occultists who do have some knowledge, and also when one takes a closer look at the writings of Laurence Oliphant,17Laurence Oliphant (1829–88), English travel writer and mystic. His two most significant works relating to mysticism are "Sympneumata" (1886) and "Scientific Religion" (1888). why this English occult literature was produced: the aim was to present in English, or Western European, garb the ideas evolved in Central Europe, where for the time being they had to give way to a more materialistic development. That is why I have felt saddened beyond hope over and over again on hearing some Germans talk who were never satisfied unless able to point out that all genuine occult endeavour should really be ‘English’ and that we should adopt as much as possible from there. They simply do not realise that occult material originating in Medieval German culture has been taken over to Britain and is now coming back in English garb. One might even do some relevant research work; some startling results would emerge, for example, if one were to translate English occult writings and then look at them side by side with what exists of Medieval German occultist literature, work that has much more depth and seriousness to it. Some of the results of such a comparison would be positively grotesque! One would find that in Central European evolution, highly spiritual elements are merely covered over with a kind of rubble, and that these same elements are now being brought back again in a form heavily imbued with British materialism, without people being aware of the fact that they originally went to Britain from Central Europe.
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky initially took in the elements that had been part of Medieval occultism. She was never fully conscious of what was happening to her, for her psychic gifts were largely of a subconscious nature. Yet there was also this tremendous, urgent desire in the West of Europe to subordinate everything that held potential for the future to the Anglo-Saxon element, and in connection with this—I could of course give you all the details, but lean only give an outline here, time being short—Madame Blavatsky was at a certain moment induced to join a particular secret society in Paris.
Madame Blavatsky, on the one hand possessing Russian qualities deepened by occultism and on the other having taken in a considerable volume of genuine knowledge that had originated in Central Europe—Rosicrucian, if you like, or call it what you will—thus joined a secret society in Paris. She was now a member of this society. Her soul was tremendously powerful and presented what lived in it most forcefully; she certainly would not easily accept being regarded as simply a higher kind of medium, which would have suited those secret societies in Paris. Their particular problem was that Madame Blavatsky was able to present all her occult experiences to the world, if she felt so inclined, having taken them into a kind of higher psyche. If the situation had been different they could have said to the world: What we have to say is not merely based on theories; it presents itself via a supra-mediumistic channel, coming forth from a vigorous Russian soul, from the psyche of someone who is psychic to the highest degree. If that had been the intention, Madame Blavatsky would have had to have been a much less self-willed individual. But she certainly would not accept such a thing. In fact she made conditions when she was a member of that secret society in Paris—I’ll not say what these were now, but the time will come when these things should be discussed—and this arose from the powerful Blavatsky urge. She sensed that the people in the West wanted to further Western dominance—in so far as this can be furthered by occultism—and she did not want to have anything to do with this. For it was particularly during that time in Paris, when there were those strange goings-on in the Parisian secret society, that she was tremendously conscious of being a Russian and made conditions relating to her remaining a member—as I said, I am not going to tell you what they were—that could in no way be accepted if the society was to continue to deal with the outside world. She made conditions that would have been liable to turn the whole history of France upside down. As a result she was excluded from the society and the feeling was that this had happened in the nick of time, otherwise she would have come to know too many of the society’s secrets.
Various other things then happened, among them that she had now got a taste, as it were, for being involved in world affairs. She therefore got herself admitted to another society, this time an American one. Here she did not make the same conditions as in Paris, but she acted in such a way that it should have been possible to achieve by the American route what she had previously intended to achieve in Paris by openly making her conditions. Working together with Olcott,18Colonel Henry Steel Olcott (c. 1830–1907), established the Theosophical Society together with Madame Blavatsky in 1875, remaining its President until his death. who was far from satisfied with the situation in America at that time, she had great plans for America, plans apt to make Anglo-Saxon Western occultists feel extremely hot under the collar. Even Dr Faustus would not have felt that hot under the collar, nor even Richard III, as Goethe once put it when speaking out of a certain mood.19It has not been possible to trace this. Apart from this something else had now also happened, something that had not yet happened in Paris, and that was that Madame Blavatsky knew and understood too much of the underlying aims. Something had been done that certainly was not entirely justifiable if one went by the ancient and most sacred rules; yet it was something that had to happen in order to prevent what might have been a great disaster. A meeting of American and European occultists considered future plans and after all kinds of digressions the measures that were taken resulted in what in occult terms is called ‘occult imprisonment’. This meant that certain steps were taken to ensure that the aims of particular individuals, and specifically their occult aims, were imprisoned in a kind of sphere, with the result that the individuals concerned would keep seeing their own aims being directed back at them and would be unable to see beyond the limits of the sphere. Madame Blavatsky was put into such an occult sphere. Things were arranged in such a way that she was physically in Asia during her occult imprisonment.
However, things were also happening on the stage of human evolution. As I’ve said before, this story is not entirely accurate; that is to say, the details are accurate but lack of time makes it necessary to leave out some things that can perhaps be told at another time and that one may indeed wish to tell at another time. What happened was that leading occultists in India were seeking by occult methods to further the political aims of the Indian people, and the method used was to release Madame Blavatsky from her occult imprisonment. Then everything that had initially had a Central European flavour and had then been covered over with everything that Western European occultists had sought to inculcate into her now assumed an Indian flavour. Poor Madame Blavatsky had got herself caught up in a complex occult experience, as it were. The day came when she was out of her occult imprisonment; but all the occult elements in her soul had assumed an Indian quality. Added to this was the largely unconscious influence of Olcott, with the result that those occult elements with their Indian quality were made to serve Anglo-Saxon aims once again. The outcome was that Madame Blavatsky’s former guide was replaced by another, though she called him by the same name, Koot Hoomi. The second guide, however,—this is well known to those who are in the secret—was essentially nothing more than a wretch subservient to the Russians, someone pursuing quite different aims in everything communicated to Madame Blavatsky and her followers from the honest dissemination of occult knowledge; this individual was above all serving major political aims, as a kind of Russian spy, and sought to direct and channel the affair in such a way that the spiritual marriage between the Russian and the Anglo-Saxon element would be brought about from the other end.
Everything that is now such a ghastly corruption in many of the extraordinarily great truths, including those to be found in Madame Blavatsky’ s "Secret Doctrine", has its roots in the things I have touched on here. It should also be noted that the eminently Russian characteristic given to the whole Blavatsky movement by this later Koot Hoomi was afterall not to the taste of some high-ranking English occultists; certain occult groups in particular that were extraordinarily close to the high Anglican Church20C. G. Harrison, author of "The Transcendental Universe". did everything in their power to fight that Russian element. That is quite a story in itself.
Above all it must be clearly understood that Helena Blavatsky was an extraordinarily important psychic individual; all kinds of endeavours and currents were active in her out of the psyche. At that time, and particularly when she first came to prominence, there was a general tendency to pave the way for certain political developments by stunning the populace, as it were, with certain occult teachings. There is a class of occultists who know only too well that there is no better way of making people stupid—forgive me for using such a harsh term—than by presenting occult teachings in a certain way. Unless one has the will to be absolutely truthful, it is possible to lead the people, whom one has thus rendered stupid, in any desired direction. That is the inclination of occultists of the more or less black or grey kind. They often pursue distant political goals, preparing the way with great care and over a long period. It is not for nothing that in certain secret societies, mainly in Britain but also in France, people are, or at least were, taught over and over again what the future destiny of Poland was to be and what their attitudes should be to the various aims of the Polish people and the cultural and spiritual streams in that country. It is not for nothing that members were always taught that Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia and the adjoining Balkan territories should be brought together and how preparations should be made to create certain political undercurrents in order to further those aims. There is tremendous political activity going on in the secret societies, particularly those of Western Europe.
Madame Blavatsky would never lend herself to occult promotion of purely Anglo-Saxon concerns; at the same time, being psychic, she came to be considered dangerous by, for instance, the high-ranking occultists who were particularly close to the high Anglican Church and whose sole and singular aim was the one I have already outlined. The individuals concerned had thought at first that they could work through people with minor talents who had not developed their thinking and therefore generally had little idea of what was really going on. They thought they could achieve particularly good results by guiding the steps of Mr Sinnett21Alfred Percy Sinnett whose main work, "Esoteric Buddhism", was first published in 1883. in a certain direction. In the circumstances I have outlined it is always possible to guide the steps of another person, unless one firmly bases oneself on the principle that in occultism nothing transcends the freedom and dignity of the individual. It is indeed necessary to remind occultists and those who are studying occultism over and over again that they need to keep a close watch on themselves particularly in this respect. Mrs Besant, too, has gradually come into these things without really understanding what is going on, but she also has a strong Anglo-Saxon trait, and that is why all those things could be brought about through her that have been brought about. If you consider the complexities of the stream in which she has been placed you will understand quite a few things, particularly in the case of Mrs Besant. One does of course have to make the effort to gain some insight into these things.
It is most important, my friends, that our true, clear judgement, our ability to have a clear overview over the external situation, is not affected when we enter into occult studies; we have to use sound common sense in our assessment of the external situation and not let our minds be befogged by all kinds of occult teachings. We need a clear head to judge what goes on in life so that we do not get caught up in all kinds of murky occultistic charlatanism and above all in situations where under the influence of certain centres the aim is anything but the utter truth; instead, certain occult teachings are spread abroad just to make it possible to fish in murky waters and thus further specific aims and purposes. Another urgent necessity, also in our movement, is to make a clear distinction between honest seeking for truth, based on realisation of what has to come into the general spiritual development of humanity today, and all the things that are particularly at the present time making themselves felt in the world as occultism—where one should not even admit to taking a real interest in the relevant facts. Clear distinction must be made between sheer superstition that befalls those who ‘know’ -’know-’ in the worst sense of the word—and the spiritual movement that is to remain clear and bright within the stream to which we belong, and no one should ever be left in doubt as to which side we are definitely not on. That is absolutely essential, for otherwise a state of confusion arises that may have disastrous results. In future these things will be made known and discussed more from the materialistic point of view and undoubtedly made use of to harm all occult teaching... [a section of original has been omitted—Editor]
One has to look into the deeper connections that exist if one wants to form an opinion of what is going on in the world. And even if little can be said about these things at the present time, because we are blocked, as it were, and also because some dates are missing—the time will come when the role that those Western European secret societies have played in everything that led to the outbreak of war in Western Europe will be apparent, societies that are able to pull strings—and more than strings—in English ministries, Parisian ministries and so on. It will also be apparent that these Masonic organisations played a major role in Western Europe when the aim was to get Italy to join the ‘Entente’, as it was called. They were extremely busy and also well connected with certain organisations in Eastern Europe.
As to German masons of both lower and higher degree, they were of course members of a world-wide organisation, exchanging ‘fraternal greetings’ and stressing fraternal co-operation with the others; it can be said in their defence that they were too stupid to have any idea of the whole business they were involved in. The most outstanding characteristic of Central European masons is that they were duped right to the last moment, as were others who were not masons and who were in a position where possibly they should not have been duped... [a section of original has been omitted—Editor]
I have tried to give you at least an outline of what may be important to you and at the same time may sharpen awareness of a number of things that inevitably had to happen. It would no doubt also be good to reflect a little on the deeper background to the fact that our Central European spiritual movement dissociated itself from all the rubbish that finally got into the Besant connection and that is now given vent to in such a peculiar way, right down to out and out slander. That, surely, may be said, though let me repeat that it is not my intention to open up old disputes again. Thus one of the things Mrs Besant is now publishing in her English journal is the ridiculous tale that I had had ambitions to be elected president of the whole Theosophical Society so that I might go to India and oust her, Mrs Besant, from her sphere of work; she has said that the real reason for those ambitions of mine was that land the others who are with me were in fact agents of the German government and that our purpose had been nothing less than to use all kinds of occult machinations to put a kind of pan-Germanism in the place of the Anglo-Saxon stream and above all to work from India to oust the British government. These things are now put with even greater acrimony in Mrs Besant’s articles. She knows how to talk rubbish also on other topics, fit enough to go with the Alcyone22The Theosophical Society’s name for Jiddu Krishnamurti (1895–1986), Indian theosophist declared the Messiah by Mrs. Besant in 1925. rubbish. The latest is, however, that Alcyone is to be deprived of the honour of being the future Christ-bearer. Well, others were deposed when the position was given to him, as you know. Changes have always been made as need arose. Certain esoteric groups even thought of making the Russian crown prince the Christ-bearer—young Alexei! The present incumbent would of course have to be deposed. There have been others before, sometimes even more than one at a time. Well, if you don’t allow one party to tell the other—always only hints given, a mysterious business, as you can see—it is possible to have more than one, thing at a time.
You see, however, if these things are taken too lightly we fall to take note of something like the following: In 1909, when the worst of the Leadbeater-Besant brouhaha was developing,23Charles Webster Leadbeater (1847–1934), well-known theosophical writer working with Mrs Besant in the Theosophical Society. The ‘Leadbeater case’ shook the whole of the Society to its foundations and resulted in Leadbeater’s exclusion in 1906, followed by reinstatement in 1909. All this was well known to Rudolf Steiner’s audience; for details see Eugene Levy, "Mrs Annie Besant and the Crisis in the Theosophical Society". the ‘first of the worst things’, a society was formed that was supposed to be international. Mr Keightley,24Bertram Keightley (1860–1949), General Secretary of the Indian Section of the Theosophical Society and at times also of the European Section. a long-time friend of Mrs Besant who used to revise her books for her to remove scientific errors, was then specially involved in plans for this international society that was to be established in opposition to Besant from India. I was asked by letter if I would be prepared to be president of this international society.25See lecture Rudolf Steiner gave in Berlin on 28th March 1916, in "Gegenwärtiges und Vergangenes", GA 167; translation by E. Goddard in manuscript at Rudolf Steiner House Library in London: Things of the present and of the past in the spirit of man; flashlights on the deeper impulses of history (Library code C 42). The offer came from India. 1909 was the year of the Budapest Congress. At the time I told Mrs Besant in front of witnesses that I had been offered the presidency. I did however only say this to a few people then, on the boat, and immediately afterwards told her: "Where the occult movement is concerned the only thing I can be is someone who within the German context represents that which he has to represent, and I shall never in any way hold an occult position outside the German context". And now she dares to say in a journal that I had had ambitions to become president by taking up the Indian offer. I have always spoken of objective untruths with reference to many things that Mrs Besant has said. But when this kind of thing happens, despite the fact that I had expressly told her that I never wished to be anything else in the Theosophical Society than at most the General Secretary of the German Section or something that makes up this Section, then one need no longer speak of objective untruth but may as well say: here we have not an objective untruth on the part of Mrs Besant but—just as in the case of the Jesuit allegation – a deliberate lie. And if people now wish to defend Mrs Besant they will have to take on board that someone who knows the situation tells them that they are defending a deliberate liar. And if you take the Jesuit allegation together with this business and the whole campaign that is now being waged against what we will to do here, waged out of English chauvinism, we may indeed speak of a systematic campaign of lies; that quite definitely exists.
If you think I am putting things too strongly, remember that I never say anything by way of attack and always speak out only when it has become defence. This should be noted especially by the people who keep saying that one needs to be fair to both sides. In our case, fairness has consisted in simply closing one’s eyes to the truth—at least after the event—even in our area. What has to be is that this present time, pregnant with destiny, takes us to the point where things are seen in truth, in their full, honest and true seriousness, and are acted on. For it is true after all, that all the sacrifices now being made, with hundreds upon hundreds dying, will have been for the salvation of humanity if they find souls here on earth who know how to think and feel the right way about the times. Something is preparing in the world of the spirit and if those who are able to understand see it in the right way, then it will turn into powers in future that souls who have understanding and occult feeling then transform into powers that take humanity onwards. If it is not understood, then the events of the present will in spiritual terms take a direction where the very powers that are now available in the world of the spirit as the outcome of hundreds upon hundreds of sacrificial deaths are given into the hands of Ahriman. That is why I have always said:26E.g. in conclusion of many of the lectures Rudolf Steiner gave in Berlin in 1914–15 (see "Destinies of Individuals and of Nations", tr. A.R. Meuss; London: Rudolf Steiner Press).
Out of courage shown in battle,
Out of the blood shed in war,
Out of the grief of those who are left,
Out of the people’s deeds of sacrifice
Fruit of spirit shall be won
If souls with knowledge of the spirit
Turn their mind to realm of spirit.
Fünfter Vortrag
Wir wollen den heutigen Abend mehr zu einer okkult-geschichtlichen Betrachtung verwenden und uns übermorgen zu einer rein menschlichen okkulten Betrachtung wenden. Wenn ich nun heute von einer Frage ausgehen will, gewissermaßen herausgefordert durch verschiedene Notwendigkeiten, die schon vorliegen und die angesichts der Ereignisse der Gegenwart besprochen werden müssen, so soll dies wirklich nicht dazu führen, daß ich Altes aufwärmen möchte, daß ich auf alte Streitigkeiten zurückkommen möchte, sondern es soll dazu dienen, einiges zu sagen, was eben gesagt werden muß. Und deshalb möchte ich von einer Frage ausgehen, die ich nicht unmittelbar beantworten will, sondern die durch verschiedene Betrachtungen, die ich nachher anstellen will, beantwortet werden soll. Ich will von der Frage ausgehen: Warum verleumdet seit dem Kriegsbeginn Mrs. Besant in ihren englischen Journalen unsere deutsche Bewegung in einer so unerhörten Weise Warum hat sie mit diesem ihrem Verleumdungsfeldzug bald nach dem Ausbruch des Krieges begonnen, und warum setzt sie das auch in der Gegenwart wiederum in einer geradezu unglaublichen Weise fort? — Nun, einige Anhaltspunkte zur Beantwortung dieser Fragen werden eben gerade die nachfolgenden Betrachtungen geben können.
Die Vorträge, die ich jetzt in der Öffentlichkeit im Zusammenhange mit unserer geistigen Bewegung zu halten habe, müssen ja selbstverständlich so gehalten werden, wie sie für die Öffentlichkeit verständlich sind. Aber im Grunde liegt jedem Satze, der so gesprochen wird, viel, viel Tieferes noch zugrunde: Es ist jeder Satz aus der Notwendigkeit eines gewissen Tatsachenzusammenhanges heraus gesprochen. Und einiges aus diesem Tatsachenzusammenhang will ich eben heute sagen.
Oftmals habe ich ja darauf aufmerksam gemacht, wie wir in einem Zeitalter leben, in dem unbedingt etwas von okkult-geistiger Erkenntnis in die ganze Kulturbewegung einfließen muß. Nun ist die okkulte Strömung, die geisteswissenschaftliche Strömung für die Entwickelung der Menschheit im Grunde genommen eigentlich niemals ganz abgerissen. Aber man muß schon mit einem, nicht gerade Vorurteil, aber mit einer Art Vorempfindung, die sehr verbreitet ist auch in unseren Reihen, brechen, wenn man gewisse Dinge, die man schon wissen soll, in der richtigen Art beurteilen will. Brechen muß man nämlich — es kann schon nicht anders gesagt werden — mit einer gewissen Traumessucht, mit einer gewissen Verschlafenheit, die so leicht sich demjenigen ergibt, der an unsere geisteswissenschaftliche Bewegung herantritt und etwas so recht Molliges haben will für seine Seele, etwas, das ihn so warm durchs Leben trägt, bei dem man zuhört, das man auf sich so wirken läßt, daß es einem dabei warm wird, daß man glauben kann an die höhere Bestimmung der Menschenseele, was ja alles ganz richtig ist, was aber auch durchaus verbunden sein kann mit einem gewissen Einlullen des Gemütes. Das beobachtet man ja nur zu häufig gerade bei denen, die Geisteswissenschaft auf ihre Seele wirken lassen und die nicht zu gleicher Zeit anstreben, gerade durch das, was Geisteswissenschaft sein kann, ein klares, sicheres Urteil über die Begebenheiten des Lebens, über die Verschlingungen der Tatsachen, innerhalb welcher ja jeder einzelne Mensch steht, zu finden.
Nun ist oftmals, wenn die Menschheitsentwickelung erörtert worden ist, darauf aufmerksam gemacht worden, wie unser fünfter nachatlantischer Kulturzeitraum, in dem wir leben, die Aufgabe hat, die Bewußtseinsseele herauszubilden aus den allgemeinen Anlagen der Menschenseele, und wie dann im sechsten nachatlantischen Zeitraum das Geistselbst wird herausgearbeitet werden müssen. Und es ist darauf aufmerksam gemacht worden, wie wesentlich mitwirken müssen gewisse menschheitliche Anlagen, die gerade im Osten Europas, heute noch schlummernd und schlafend, bei dem russischen Volke zu finden sind, wenn in einer entsprechenden Weise gerade in richtiger Art der sechste nachatlantische Kulturzeitraum wirksam werden soll. Und da ist es nötig, daß gewisse Eigenschaften, die in der russischen Volksseele so tief begründet sind, daß wirklich der russische Mensch, wenn er nicht irregeführt werden wird durch seine «Intelligenzija», in seiner Seele tief durchstrahlt ist von diesen Eigenschaften. Auf solche Eigenschaften ist da aufmerksam zu machen. Diese russische Volksseele hat in ihrer ganzen Art etwas, man könnte es fast nennen Weibliches, etwas Anschmiegungsfähiges, etwas, was sich leicht eignet, dasjenige aufzunehmen, was die Kulturentwickelung gebracht hat.
Damit steht ja im Zusammenhang, daß der russische Mensch aufnimmt und im Verlaufe der Entwickelung, die er durchgemacht hat, immer aufgenommen hat das, was aus alten Zeiten als die mehr orientalisch gefärbten, byzantinischen Religionsformen die russische Kultur durchströmt. Wenig innerlich produktiv, wenig innerlich schöpferisch ist die russische Volksseele bisher, aber im eminentesten Sinne aufnahmefähig. Daher kann auch so wenig von einer Fortentwickelung der russisch-orthodoxen Religion in den Jahrhunderten gesprochen werden, in denen diese russisch-byzantinisch orientierte Religion unter den Russen gewirkt hat. Wer eine Zeremonie in der russischen Kirche mitmacht, und wäre es auch nur vorübergehend, der kann empfinden, wie unendlich viel von orientalisch-Aurahaftem diese Zeremonien durchströmt, wie gewissermaßen Aurenhaftes fühlbar hereingetragen wird in die unmittelbare Gegenwart. Das ist das eine.
Ein Zweites: In dieser russischen Volksseele liegt enthalten, daß der einzelne russische Mensch wenig Sinn hat für dasjenige, was in Westund Mitteleuropa für die Durchgliederung des sozialen Lebens und dessen Weiterentwickelung schon einmal notwendig ist an Gedankenformen. Eine Notwendigkeit, die damit angedeutet ist, besteht ja, lag vor zum Beispiel mit der Übernahme des streng juristischen Denkens in die europäische soziale Ordnung. Aber für dieses Durchzogensein des sozialen Lebens mit Gedankenformen hat der russische Mensch wenig Verständnis. Das beirrt ihn in dem, was er das freie gefühlsmäßige Ausleben seines Schicksals nennen möchte. Er möchte nicht durch irgendwelche in die äußere soziale Struktur eingeflochtenen Gedankenformen beirrt sein.
Und ein dritter Zug ist der, welcher Herder so angezogen hat und der schon einmal wirklich innig verbunden ist mit dem, was man russische Volksseele nennen kann. Denn entdeckt wurde dieser Zug nicht in Rußland selber, das heißt, betont begrifflich herausgehoben wurde er nicht in Rußland, sondern ursprünglich von Herder, wie der Slawismus und der Panslawismus überhaupt von Herder außerordentlich viel entlehnt hat; wiederum ein Beweis für die Anschmiegefähigkeit des Russentums. Der dritte Zug ist also der einer gewissen Friedfertigkeit, eines nichtaggressiven Wesens in bezug auf das Geistesleben, eines mehr passiv sich hingebenden Wesens. Das aggressive Eintreten für irgendwelche Dogmen oder dergleichen liegt dem russischen Volkstum fern. Das ist eine dritte Eigenschaft.
Natürlich können solche Eigenschaften durch verschiedene Umstände — gerade das bringt ja die Kompliziertheit des Menschenlebens mit sich — in ihr Gegenteil verkehrt werden, und durch jene Volksverführer, mit denen man es jetzt zu tun hat, sind fast alle diese drei Züge unmittelbar in ihr Gegenteil verkehrt. Dem, der in der Geisteswissenschaft darinsteht, sollte das nicht irgendwie wunderbar erscheinen.
So sieht man aber —- und wir würden es noch viel mehr sehen, wenn wir das jetzt nur in ein paar Strichen Angedeutete ausführlicher studieren könnten —, daß da im Osten Europas ein Material vorhanden ist, das gewissermaßen zusammenfließen muß mit dem, was im Westen Europas aus einer viel aktiveren Entwickelung herauskommt. In dem Westen Europas sind geradezu die entgegengesetzten Charakterzüge zu ergreifen. Es wurde darauf hingewiesen, was da aus einer gewissen aktiven Entwickelung heraus der Menschheit bis in unseren fünften nachatlantischen Zeitraum herein hat gebracht werden können und was ihr weiter gebracht werden muß, wenn solche Dinge nicht verschlafen werden, wie sie zum Beispiel auch gestern wiederum in meinem Vortrag über einen verklungenen Ton des deutschen Geisteslebens gekennzeichnet worden sind.
Für denjenigen, der nun wirklich unbefangen die Entwickelung des geistigen Lebens betrachten kann - unbefangen auch dann, wenn es sich ihm ja zunächst in der äußeren physischen Wirklichkeit, gerade in der Gegenwart, in den furchtbarsten Zerrbildern, in Karikaturen darbietet -—, der die inneren Triebkräfte dieses Geisteslebens betrachten kann, ist es aber doch klar, daß durch eine gewisse Tatsache gerade dasjenige, was im mitteleuropäischen Geistesleben vorhanden ist, eine Art Ehe eingehen muß mit dem, was aus den russischen natürlichen Anlagen herausfließt. Eine Art Zusammenwirken muß stattfinden zwischen dem, was in Mitteleuropa, ich möchte sagen, durch die Eigenart dieses mitteleuropäischen Geisteslebens gezeugt werden kann, und dem, was aufgenommen werden kann durch gewisse rein natürliche Eigenschaften des europäischen Ostens.
Wenn Sie das mitteleuropäische Geistesleben noch genauer studieren würden, namentlich jenen Zug, auf den ich jetzt im öffentlichen Vortrag aufmerksam machte, so würden Sie sehen: Gewiß, in diesem Zug liegt noch nicht Geisteswissenschaft als solche, aber es liegt wirklich etwas darin, das der Keim zur Geisteswissenschaft ist. Fichte spricht, wie ich es oftmals angeführt habe, von einem «höheren Sinn». Goethe spricht von «anschauender Urteilskraft». Schelling spricht davon, daß sich die Seele erheben müsse, wenn sie wirklich in die Geheimnisse des Daseins hineinblicken will, zu dem, was er «intellektuelle Anschauung» nennt. Um die Dinge genauer zu verstehen, muß man auch aufmerksam machen auf etwas, was Schelling im Alter noch geleistet hat in den ungeheuer tiefsinnigen Werken «Philosophie der Mythologie» und «Philosophie der Offenbarung». Ein tiefes Erfassen des Christentums lebt in diesen Werken, die heute noch nicht verstanden werden. Eine geistige Auffassung der Welt lebt in einer Schrift wie zum Beispiel «Die Gottheiten von Samothrake», wo Schelling versucht, in die Mysterien der samothrakischen Kabiren einzudringen. Eigentlich tritt nirgends im neueren Geistesleben so stark das Bewußtsein auf, daß man es im Christentum nicht zu tun habe mit einer Summe von Dogmen, daß das eigentlich Nebensache ist, was als christliche Dogmen gepflegt wird, sondern daß die Hauptsache ist, daß das Christus-Ereignis, das Mysterium von Golgatha stattgefunden hat, nirgends tritt einem das so stark entgegen wie in Schellings «Philosophie der Offenbarung». Das alles ist entwickelungsfähig, das alles muß zu jener Entwickelung führen, die wir so oft vorgezeichnet haben, wenn wir auf das, was im fünften nachatlantischen Zeitraum gerade durch Mitteleuropa geleistet werden muß, denkend hinblicken.
Nun aber Westeuropa! Wenn man Westeuropa betrachtet, muß man vor allen Dingen sich klar darüber sein, daß dieser Westen Europas überall durchsetzt ist von einem historisch, traditionell überlieferten Okkultismus, der sich nirgends in so organischer, in so lebensvoller Weise aus dem ergibt, was auch draußen im exoterischen Leben lebt, wie sich ein wahrer neuzeitlicher Okkultismus ergeben kann aus der Geistesströmung, die durch Goethe, Schelling, Hegel und so weiter fließt. Was im Westen als Okkultismus besteht, das knüpft nur wenig an dasjenige an, was äußere Wissenschaft ist. Es wäre unmöglich, zum Beispiel für England einen ähnlichen Zusammenhang zwischen okkulter Wissenschaft und dem eigentlichen Erkenntnisstreben herauszufinden, wie es bei dem Weltbilde des deutschen Idealismus wirklich der Fall ist. Man kann sich nicht denken, daß dasjenige, was äußerlich echt englisch ist, etwa die Philosophie des Baco von Verulam, des Spencer, der englisch gefärbte Darwinismus oder jetzt wiederum der neuere Pragmatismus, einen ebensolchen Weg hinüber finde zu dem, was da in den verschiedenen okkulten Orden des Westens lebt, wie das bei dem deutschen Idealismus der Fall ist. Was durch diese verschiedenen okkulten Orden durchgeht, das muß sich abschließen, das kann keine rechte Brücke schaffen zu einer äußeren weltlichen Wissenschaft.
Dafür aber besteht in diesen westlichen Ordenszusammenhängen, namentlich in gewissen Hochgradorden, eine Erkenntnis, die historisch überliefert ist, die jeder in sich aufnimmt, es besteht eine gewisse Erkenntnis, ich möchte sagen, jener europäischen Weltenlage, die wirklich ihr Hauptgeheimnis in der eben geschilderten Tatsache hat: daß auf der einen Seite wie aus dem Blut heraus der Osten Europas zur Aufnahme bestimmt ist, daß dasjenige aber, was westlich von diesem Osten Europas liegt, dazu bestimmt ist, etwas zu entwickeln, was von dem Osten aufgenommen werden soll. Diese Erkenntnis liegt ganz bestimmt vor bei den leitenden Persönlichkeiten der westlichen Orden. Da, wo diese leitenden Persönlichkeiten die Grundidee ihres okkulten Wirkens entwickeln, sprechen sie durchaus von diesem Zusammenhange.
Aber es ist mit der Entwickelung solcher Grundideen im Westen etwas ganz Bestimmtes verknüpft. Was damit verknüpft ist, sieht man am besten, wenn man die Dinge verfolgt, wo sie am starrsten und am eingebildetsten geworden sind: innerhalb des britischen Ordenslebens. Es lebt in jedem, der in diesem britischen Ordensleben in gewisse höhere Grade eingeführt wird — gewisse höhere Grade der Einweihung, die er historisch kennt, in die er natürlich nicht wirklich lebendig eingeweiht ist —, eine gewisse Vorstellung, nämlich, daß das Angelsachsentum aus seinem Volkswesen heraus das bringen müsse, was sich mit dem russischen Volkstum verbinden kann zu einer Art von geistiger Kulturehe. Denn ein jeder, der so, wie ich es eben charakterisiert habe, in dem angelsächsischen Okkultismus darinsteht, betrachtet ihn als dasjenige, was ablösen muß die tiefsten okkulten treibenden Kräfte des griechisch-lateinischen Wesens. So denkt man. Da war für die vierte nachatlantische Kulturperiode, die, wie wir ja wissen, im 15. Jahrhundert etwa zu Ende gegangen ist, eben maßgebend dasjenige, was das Griechen- und Römertum, was die griechisch-lateinische Kultur auch an Okkultismus aus sich hervorkommen ließ. Abgelöst aber muß werden in der fünften nachatlantischen Kultur dieses GriechischLateinische durch das Angelsachsentum. Das ist geradezu etwas, was gefordert wird, was also bewirkt werden muß, was sich realisieren muß. Und jeder, der so darinsteht in diesem Dogma, das ja zugleich ein Willensdogma ist: Die fünfte nachatlantische Kultur muß angelsächsische Physiognomie, angelsächsisches Gepräge tragen -, der hat zugleich ein gewisses Bild von der zukünftigen Gestaltung Europas. Er hat das Bild von der zukünftigen Gestaltung Europas, daß dasjenige, was in Mitteleuropa an Geistesleben existiert, vor allen Dingen unterdrückt werden müsse als etwas, was nicht in die Zukunft der Menschheit hinüberfließen darf. Darüber müsse man so hinweggehen als über eine unbedeutende Tatsache.
Ein mehr oder weniger unbewußtes Dogma ist das in allen angelsächsischen, und von da ausgehend auch in allen Orden, die zum Beispiel irgendwie einen Zusammenhang haben mit dem «Grand Orient de France», und in allen westeuropäischen Geheimgesellschaften. Ein Grunddogma, das so mehr oder weniger unbewußt wirkt, ist eben: Dieses mitteleuropäische Wissen kommt nicht in Betracht für die fünfte nachatlantische Kultur, darf nicht in Betracht kommen. Es muß alles so eingerichtet werden, daß die fünfte nachatlantische Kultur angelsächsische Physiognomie trägt. Daher muß eine Art von Ehe zwischen Westeuropa und Osteuropa eben mit Vernachlässigung des mitteleuropäischen Lebens herbeigeführt werden. — In solchen okkulten Orden sprach man seit vielen, vielen Jahren immer von jenem Kriege, in dem wir jetzt leben. Man malte diesen Krieg nicht etwa weniger schrecklich aus, als er sich jetzt vollzogen hat. Es ist nur ein naiver Glaube, daß dieser Krieg so hereingebrochen wäre, ohne daß ihn viele Menschen vorausgesehen hätten, als ob nicht viel geredet worden wäre über diesen Krieg. Es ist viel darüber geredet worden! Und den Satz von dem kommenden großen europäischen Kriege finden Sie überall, auch immer wieder und wiederum gerade in den angelsächsischen Orden, angeführt und besprochen. Immer wieder und wiederum findet sich da der Hinweis, daß ein solcher großer europäischer Konflikt kommen müsse. Und man malt sich die künftige Lage Europas aus. Man weiß, daß mit der sechsten nachatlantischen Kulturperiode, die man, etwas materialistisch gefärbt, im angelsächsischen Sinne die sechste Unterrasse nennt, die genannten Eigenschaften, die Blutseigenschaften, möchte ich sagen, des russischen Volkes etwas zu tun haben und daß daher herbeigeführt werden muß eine Art Zusammenfließen des westeuropäischen Wesens mit dem russischen Wesen. Über diese Dinge muß man durchaus klar denken, man muß sie sich klar vor Augen halten, sonst lebt man schlafend in dem, was okkulte Bewegung der Gegenwart ist.
Im Zusammenhange damit möchte ich Sie auf eine Tatsache aufmerksam machen. Ich habe sie nicht vergessen, kann sie auch nicht vergessen. Als Mrs. Besant ihre erste Reise zu uns nach Mitteleuropa machte, da wurde zuerst in Hamburg mit ihr eine Versammlung veranstaltet, wo sie einen Vortrag hielt. Ich stellte damals eine bestimmte Frage an Mrs. Besant: Wenn wir jetzt beginnen wollen mit einer mitteleuropäisch-okkulten Bewegung, wie verhält es sich damit, daß am Ausgangspunkte des 19. Jahrhunderts, an der Wende des 18. zum 19. Jahrhundert, bedeutungsvolle Keime eines besonderen Geisteslebens gerade in Mitteleuropa zu bemerken sind? — Da antwortete Mrs. Besant — selbstverständlich wurde wenig verstanden von dem Zusammenhang, der der Sache zugrunde liegt —: Damals ist eben innerhalb des deutschen Lebens in abstrakter, begrifflicher Form etwas von Geisteserkennen hervorgetreten; aber weil das eben die Menschheit nicht brauchen konnte, mußte es in einer reineren, höheren, in einer wahren Form innerhalb des englischen Geisteslebens später erst richtig entfaltet werden. — Es mag für manche Leute unangenehm sein, daß gerade solche charakteristische Äußerungen von mir nicht vergessen werden. Sie werden schon nicht vergessen werden.
Nun bot sich im letzten Drittel des 19. Jahrhunderts ein besonderes, außerordentlich bedeutsames Phänomen mit Bezug auf die okkulte Entwickelung Europas dar, und sogar hinübergreifend bis nach Amerika. Und dieses Phänomen, das allerdings äußerlich nur als eine Persönlichkeit aufzutreten scheint, hat eine viel größere Bedeutung, als man gewöhnlich anzunehmen geneigt ist. Dieses Phänomen tritt uns nämlich in der Persönlichkeit von Helena Petrowna Blavatsky entgegen. Außerlich liegt ja schon die Tatsache vor — aber diese außerordentliche Tatsache ist nur der Ausdruck für tiefe innere geistige Zusammenhänge -, daß Helena Petrowna Blavatsky hervorgegangen ist aus dem russischen Volkstum, mit allen Eigenschaften dieses russischen Volkstums, aber aus diesem große, medial gestaltete spirituelle Eigenschaften entwickelnd, vor allen Dingen im höchsten Maße psychische Eigenschaften.
Man muß einen Begriff davon haben, was das Auftreten eines solchen Phänomens im okkulten Entwickelungsgang der Menschheit bedeutet, wenn man ein solches Phänomen eben ganz würdigen, wenn man mit Verständnis folgen will dem, was ich jetzt zum Beispiel zu sagen habe. In den angelsächsischen, westlichen Orden, Geheimbünden und so weiter, die sich mit den okkulten Ideen so befaßten, wie ich es jetzt eben charakterisiert habe, entstand ein reges Leben, als bekannt wurde, daß solch eine einzigartige Persönlichkeit da ist, die gerade aus dem charakteristischsten russischen Volkstum heraus Zukunftseigenschaften der Menschheitsentwickelung, in hervorstechenden psychischen Eigenschaften konzentriert, in einer ganz einzigartigen Mediumnität zeigt. Es rührte sich überall. Nach Fragen drängendes Leben entstand in diesen angelsächsisch-westlichen Orden. Was da als ein drängendes Leben entstand, kann man folgendermaßen ausdrücken, wenn man auch natürlich die Dinge dabei etwas in Konturen schieben muß. Die Leute, die da die eigentlichen Wächter dieser angelsächsisch-westlichen Bewegung sind, sagten sich: Das bedeutet etwas, daß gerade aus der östlichen Menschheit heraus ein solches Individuum erwacht in der Gegenwart, das muß berücksichtigt werden, dazu muß man entsprechend Stellung nehmen. — Und es entstand jetzt wirklich die Frage: Wie bringt man dasjenige, was durch starke psychische Eigenschaften gewisse tiefe Geheimnisse der Welt weiterverraten kann, in ein Fahrwasser, so daß sich russisches Zukunftselement verbindet mit angelsächsischem Wesen? — Die Eigenschaften der Blavatsky geradezu in angelsächsisches Wesen hineinzuziehen, das wurde jetzt das Bestreben. Wenigstens wollte man es dahin bringen, daß durch die psychischen Eigenschaften der Blavatsky vor allen Dingen diejenigen okkulten Dogmen der Welt präsentiert würden, welche die westlichen Orden eben der Welt präsentieren wollten. Es sollte gezeigt werden, wie eine gewisse, von Okkultismus durchdrungene Zukunftswissenschaft kommen müsse; das strebte man an. Hinlenken wollte man das Denken der Menschen, das ja so leicht geleitet werden kann, nach dem, was hinführt von der fünften in die sechste Periode hinüber, aber so, daß es zunächst durchsetzt wird von den Trieben, die im angelsächsischen Okkultismus und in seinen Dogmen wurzeln. So sollte diese psychische Persönlichkeit der Blavatsky benützt werden, um in sie hineinzudrängen dasjenige, was historisch überliefert und als Glaubensartikel im westlichen Okkultismus lag.
Zunächst gingen die Dinge so, wie sie, ich möchte sagen, gehen sollten. Blavatsky hub durchaus damit an, sich auch in die okkulten Seiten des mitteleuropäischen Geisteslebens einzuleben. Was das bedeutet, wird uns ganz klar werden, wenn wir dieses mitteleuropäische Geistesleben auch in bezug auf seine Okkultismen noch etwas näher betrachten. Dieses mitteleuropäische Geistesleben hat nämlich immer auch Okkultes an seine Oberfläche gebracht. Dieses Okkulte ist ja sogar in einer gewissen, wenn auch äußerlichen Literatur noch zu erkennen. Es lebte im 15., 16., 17., ja noch im 18. Jahrhundert, bis dann der Jesuitismus gekommen ist und äußerlich — aber auch nur äußerlich - alles verdorben hat. Aber es lebte damals. Und wenn wir heute davon sprechen, wie in einer gewissen rein ideellen Form in der Goethe-, Schelling- und Fichte-Zeit ein tieferes Streben zum Vorschein kam, so muß man sich auch darüber klar sein, daß dieses tiefere Streben wurzelt in mitteleuropäischen Okkultismen, in einer mitteleuropäischen okkulten Entwickelung. In diese Strömung der mitteleuropäisch-okkulten Entwickelung kam zunächst auch wirklich durch einen guten Vorgang Helena Petrowna Blavatsky hinein, so daß zunächst dasjenige, was, ich möchte sagen, durch die unterirdischen Kanäle der menschlichen Persönlichkeit heraufkam in das psychische Leben der Blavatsky, durchtränkt wurde von dem, was da lebte durch das spätere Mittelalter hindurch an Okkultismus innerhalb Mitteleuropas.
Aber es war ja mit diesem mitteleuropäischen Okkultismus früher schon etwas anderes geschehen. Bloß töricht, bloß dumm sind natürlich die westlichen Okkultisten nicht; sie sind sogar mit Bezug auf das, was man so manchmal als äußere Klugheit erkennt, außerordentlich gescheit. Grey und Asquith rechne ich allerdings nicht zu diesen Gescheiten; ich will nicht etwa in das Ansehen kommen, daß ich die jetzigen englischen Staatsmänner zu diesen Klugen rechne. Aber es haben schon, namentlich innerhalb der okkulten Orden, außerordentlich bedeutende Leute gelebt, die vor allen Dingen mit großer Klugheit ausgestattet waren, und mit Hilfe dieser Klugheit ist es dahin gekommen, daß man eigentlich so ziemlich alles, was man äußerlich übernehmen konnte von dem mitteleuropäischen Okkultismus, hinübergenommen hat nach England, so daß das wieder auflebt in England in einer allerdings äußerlichen, exoterischen, aber doch umfangreichen Literatur.
Für denjenigen, der die Dinge kennt, wie sie sind, ist es ganz klar, wenn er irgend etwas nimmt von Wynn-Westcott, oder von denjenigen englischen Okkultisten, die etwas wissen, sogar wenn er intimer verfolgt die Schriften von Laurence Oliphant, worum es sich beim Produzieren dieser englischen okkulten Literatur handelt: daß man sich anschickt, demjenigen, was in Mitteleuropa erzeugt worden ist und was zunächst zurücktreten mußte in Mitteleuropa, weil eine mehr materielle Entwickelung Platz griff, ein englisches, ein westeuropäisches Gewand zu geben. Es ist ja deshalb, ich möchte sagen, so hoffnungslos betrübend, wenn man immer wieder und wiederum sah, wie gewisse Deutsche sich gar nicht genugtun konnten, darauf hinzuweisen, wie «englisch» eigentlich alles wirkliche okkultistische Streben sein müsse, und daß man da soviel wie möglich herübernehmen müsse. Die Leute wissen eben nicht, daß das, was aus mittelalterlichem Deutschtum gekommen ist, nach dort hinübergetragen worden ist und daß sie es jetzt wiederum im englischen Gewande zurücktragen. Man könnte sogar niedliche Forschungen anstellen: Sehr niedliche Forschungen würden sich zum Beispiel ergeben, wenn man englische okkulte Werke übersetzen und dann neben die Übersetzung dasjenige legen würde, was in einer viel gründlicheren, ernsteren Weise als mittelalterliche deutsche okkultistische Literatur vorhanden ist. Wenn man die zwei Dinge zusammenlegen würde, da würden sich groteske Dinge ergeben! Es würde sich nämlich ergeben, daß sehr spirituelle Dinge innerhalb der mitteleuropäischen Entwickelung nur mit einer Art von Schutt zugedeckt sind, und daß die wiederum zurückgetragen werden, von britischem Materialismus durchtränkt, ohne daß man weiß, daß sie zuerst von Mitteleuropa dort hinübergetragen worden sind.
Aber Helena Petrowna Blavatsky hat sich schon zuerst durchdrungen mit dem, was auch in mittelalterlichem Okkultismus gelebt hat. Bei ihr war ja das alles nicht voll im Bewußtsein, was sich mit ihr vollzogen hat, sie war eben in hohem Grade auch eine unterbewußt psychische Natur. Nun aber lebte das Bestreben fort, alles, was zukunftsmächtig ist, in die Unterordnung von westeuropäisch-angelsächsischem Wesen hineinzubringen. Dieser Drang lebte mächtig. Und im Zusammenhange mit diesem Drang — gewiß, ich könnte Ihnen alle einzelnen Vorgänge schildern, aber ich muß skizzieren, weil wir ja nicht so viel Zeit haben - steht, daß in einer bestimmten Zeit zum Beispiel Blavatsky veranlaßt wurde, in einen bestimmten okkulten Orden in Paris einzutreten.
Nun trat also Blavatsky, auf der einen Seite mit den okkultistisch vertieften russischen Eigenschaften, andererseits durchtränkt mit einer ganzen Summe von wirklichem Wissen, das aus Mitteleuropa stammte — sei es nun rosenkreuzerisch, oder wie Sie es nennen wollen -, in eine Pariser Geheimgesellschaft ein. Da war sie nun darin. Vermöge desjenigen, was in ihrer Seele lebte, war sie eine ungeheuer starke Seele, eine Seele, die dasjenige, was in ihr lebte, stark zur Geltung brachte, die nicht etwa so ohne weiteres darauf einging — was man natürlich in jenen okkulten Orden in Paris gerne gemocht hätte —, daß man sie nur so als ein höheres Medium betrachtete. Denn, was den Leuten besonders zu schaffen machte, das war dieses Vermögen, alle ihre okkulten Erlebnisse, wenn sie es für gut fand, der Welt mitzuteilen, da sie dieselben hineingenommen hatte in eine Art höhere Psyche. Man hätte sonst der Welt sagen können: Seht ihr, dasjenige, was wir euch zu sagen haben, das sagen wir euch nicht aus Theorien heraus, sondern das erscheint auf einem übermediumistischen Wege; da drängt es sich aus einer kernhaften, aus einer russischen Natur, aus der Psyche einer Persönlichkeit, die im höchsten Grade eine psychische Persönlichkeit ist, herein. — Hätte man das ausführen wollen, dann hätte natürlich die Blavatsky eine viel weniger eigensinnige Persönlichkeit sein müssen. Das ließ sie sich schon nicht gefallen. Daher auch die Tatsache, daß sie nun in jenem geheimen Orden in Paris Bedingungen stellte, die ich nicht nennen will — es wird auch die Zeit kommen, über diese Dinge zu sprechen —, die aber wiederum hervorgingen aus dem Blavatsky-Drang. Sie fühlte nämlich: Die da drüben im Westen wollen die westliche Herrschaft gefördert haben, soweit sie vom Okkultismus gefördert werden kann — darauf lasse ich mich nicht ein! — Denn gerade dazumal, bei all den merkwürdigen Dingen, die sich in jenem Pariser geheimen Orden abgespielt haben, fühlte sie sich stark als Russin und stellte Bedingungen, die ich, wie gesagt, nicht nennen will, für ihr Verbleiben im Orden, Bedingungen, die auch nicht im entferntesten berücksichtigt werden konnten, wenn dieser Orden noch weiter mit der Außenwelt rechnen wollte. Sie stellte Bedingungen, die gewissermaßen geeignet gewesen wären, die ganze Geschichte von Frankreich rundherum zu kugeln. Daher schloß man sie aus. Man hatte so das Gefühl, man habe sie gerade noch zur rechten Zeit ausgeschlossen, bevor sie zuviel erfahren hat von den Geheimnissen des Ordens.
Dann kamen verschiedene andere Ereignisse, unter anderem auch dieses, daß sie jetzt, ich möchte sagen, Geschmack bekommen hatte an der Teilnahme an den großen Weltereignissen. Und da ließ sie sich denn in einen anderen, jetzt in einen amerikanischen Orden aufnehmen. Da stellte sie nun nicht die Bedingungen wie in dem Pariser Orden, aber sie benahm sich so, daß das eben auf dem amerikanischen Wege hätte erreicht werden können, was sie in Paris durch die offenen Bedingungen hat erreichen wollen. Und in Verbindung mit einem Manne, dem ohnedies die amerikanischen Verhältnisse der damaligen Zeit außerordentlich wenig gefallen haben, in Verbindung mit Olcott, hatte sie große Dinge vor mit Bezug auf das amerikanische Leben, Dinge, welche die westlichen Okkultisten, sofern sie angelsächsisch sind, in eine Seelenstimmung gebracht haben, von der man sagen kann: Den Leuten wurde siedendheiß zumute! — Siedend heiß, so heiß war es nicht Dr. Faust zumute, nicht Richard III., wie Goethe einmal aus einer gewissen Stimmung heraus sagte. Und nun war außerdem noch das eingetreten, was ja in Paris noch nicht eingetreten war — nun, die Blavatsky hat schon zuviel gewußt, zu genau hineingeschaut in dasjenige, was eigentlich da als Absichten bestand! -, es war etwas entstanden, was ganz gewiß, wenn man es mißt an uraltheiligen okkulten Regeln, nicht so ganz zu rechtfertigen ist, was aber geschehen mußte, um großes Unglück, das hätte kommen können, zu verhüten. Die Dinge, die man sich vornahm, wurden gerade damals erwogen in einer Versammlung amerikanischer und europäischer Okkultisten, und nach mancherlei Umwegen ging aus den Maßnahmen, die man ergriffen hatte, das hervor, was man im Okkultismus nennt das Versetzen von jemandem in okkulte Gefangenschaft. Diese okkulte Gefangenschaft besteht darin, daß man durch gewisse Vorgänge bewirkt, daß das Streben eines Menschen, namentlich das okkulte Streben, wie eingeschlossen ist in einer Sphäre, so daß der Betreffende immer nur das eigene Streben zurückgeworfen sieht und aus der Sphäre nicht hinaussieht. In eine solche okkulte Sphäre hinein wurde nun Blavatsky versetzt. ÄAußerlich richtete man die Sache so ein, daß sie während dieser okkulten Gefangenschaft in Asien war.
Aber nun brachte die Entwickelung der Menschheit gewisse Dinge mit sich. Wie gesagt, es ist natürlich immer nicht ganz genau, was man erzählt, das heißt, es sind schon die Einzelheiten genau, aber man muß, weil man nicht Zeit hat, Dinge überspringen, die vielleicht ein anderes Mal erzählt werden können, und die zu erwähnen ein anderes Mal gewünscht werden kann. Es trat das ein, daß dann führende indische Okkultisten versuchten, dasjenige, was nun wiederum politisch für ihr indisches Volkstum von besonderem Vorteil war, dadurch auf okkulte Weise zu fördern, daß sie die Blavatsky herauszogen aus ihrer okkulten Gefangenschaft. Und alles dasjenige, was sich zunächst mitteleuropäisch gefärbt hatte, was dann überzogen war von all dem, was man in Westeuropa in sie hat hineinbringen wollen, das war jetzt indisch gefärbt, und ein kompliziertes okkultes Erleben spielte sich jetzt sozusagen um die arme Blavatsky ab. Sie war von der okkulten Gefangenschaft eines Tages frei; aber alles dasjenige, was in ihrer Seele saß an Okkultismen, das hatte eine indische Färbung bekommen. Und dazu kam der mehr unbewußte Einfluß Olcotts, der nun doch darauf hinauslief, dem Angelsachsentum diese Okkultismen, die indisch gefärbt waren, auch wiederum dienstbar zu machen. Und so konnte denn das herauskommen, daß an die Stelle der. früheren Führerschaft der Blavatsky ein anderer Führer trat, den sie nun, entsprechend dem früheren, auch weiter mit dem Namen Koot-Hoomi bezeichnete; aber der spätere, zweite Führer der Blavatsky, war im Grunde genommen — wie diejenigen, die in diese Dinge eingeweiht sind, wissen — nichts anderes als ein in russischen Diensten stehender Wicht, eine Persönlichkeit, die ganz andere Ziele verfolgte mit all den Dingen, die sie der Blavatsky und ihren Anhängern überlieferte, als in ehrlicher Weise okkulte Kenntnisse unter den Menschen zu verbreiten; eine Persönlichkeit, die vor allen Dingen große politische Ziele, eine Art von russischer Spionenschaft verfolgte, und die jetzt die Sache so leiten und lenken wollte, daß von der anderen Seite her diese geistige Ehe zwischen dem Russentum und dem Angelsachsentum zustande kommen sollte.
Alles dasjenige, was als so grauenvoll Verderbliches manche außerordentlich großen Wahrheiten, die auch in der «Secret Doctrine» enthalten sind, durchsetzt, das ist auf diese Gründe zurückzuführen, die damit angedeutet werden. Man kann auch bemerken, daß die eminent russische Färbung, die durch diesen späteren Koot-Hoomi in die ganze Blavatsky-Richtung hineingekommen ist, gewissen englischen Hochgrad-Okkultisten doch nicht paßte, und wie namentlich gewisse okkulte Kreise, die in England der Hochkirche außerordentlich nahestehen, alles daran setzten, jene Färbung, die ich eben charakterisiert habe, zu bekämpfen. Das ist eine ausführliche, eine große Geschichte, die sich da abgespielt hat.
Klar muß man sich nur vor allem darüber sein, daß Helena PetrownaBlavatsky eine außerordentlich bedeutungsvolle psychische Persönlichkeit war, in der durch ihre Psyche hindurch die mannigfaltigsten Strebungen und Strömungen gewirkt haben. Man hatte dazumal, namentlich im Anfang des äußeren Auftretens der Blavatsky, nach vielen Richtungen hin die Tendenz, gewisse politische Dinge der Zukunft auf dem Wege vorzubereiten, daß man die Leute gewissermaßen übertäubte mit gewissen Okkultismen. Es wissen ja Okkultisten einer gewissen Sorte nur allzugut, daß man — verzeihen Sie den harten Ausdruck — durch nichts die Welt besser dumm machen kann, als wenn man zunächst in einer gewissen Weise einen Okkultismus lehrt. Wenn dann nicht hinter diesen Lehren des Okkultismus die absolute Tendenz zu ehrlichem Wahrheitssinn steht, kann man die durch den Okkultismus dumm gemachten Leute überallhin führen, wohin man sie bringen will. Das ist eine Tendenz derjenigen Okkultisten, die der mehr oder weniger schwarzen, grauen Sorte angehören. Und solche verfolgen sehr häufig ferne politische Ziele, lange Zeit im voraus sorgsam alles vorbereitend. Nicht umsonst wird — oder wurde wenigstens — in gewissen Geheimgesellschaften, namentlich Britanniens, aber auch Frankreichs, immer wieder gelehrt, welches das zukünftige Schicksal Polens sein wird und wie man sich zu verhalten habe gegenüber den verschiedenen Bestrebungen und Strömungen im polnischen Volk. Nicht umsonst wurde immer gelehrt, wie der Zusammenhang entstehen müsse zwischen Rumänien, Bulgarien, Serbien und den sich angliedernden Territorien der Balkanhalbinsel, und wie man vorbereiten müsse gewisse politische Unterströmungen, damit dasjenige, was man wollte, eben gefördert werden könne. Ungeheuer viel Politik wird gerade in den westeuropäischen Geheimorden gemacht. Ich möchte sagen, große Politik wird da gemacht.
Da Blavatsky sich eigentlich doch nie hat bewegen lassen dazu, nur reines Angelsachsentum okkultistisch zu fördern, so wurde sie, weil sie eine psychische Persönlichkeit war, als gefährlich betrachtet, sagen wir zum Beispiel bei den hohen Okkultisten, die der Hochkirche besonders nahestanden und die ja einzig und allein dasjenige wollten, was ich schon angedeutet habe. Besonders dachte man da zuerst, wirken zu können durch solche Leute, die durch ihre geringen Talente, durch ihr unausgebildetes Denken eigentlich ahnungslos in einer solchen Bewegung darinstehen. Besonders viel glaubte man zu erreichen dadurch, daß man die Wege des Herrn Sinnett in einer gewissen Weise lenkte. Unter den angedeuteten Verhältnissen lassen sich ja die Wege eines Menschen, wie gesagt, leiten und lenken, wenn man nicht auf dem Boden steht, dasjenige als Höchstes anzuerkennen, was der echte Okkultismus als Höchstes anerkennen muß: die unbedingte Wahrung der menschlichen Freiheit und der menschlichen Würde. Aber es muß auch immer wieder dazu ermahnt werden, daß der Okkultist oder derjenige, der sich mit dem Okkultismus bekannt macht, gerade in bezug auf diesen Punkt Wache hält über seine Seele. Und Mrs. Besant ist ja auch ziemlich ahnungslos in die Dinge hineingewachsen, aber bei ihr ist außerdem ein starker angelsächsischer Trieb vorhanden, und so konnten all die Dinge dann auch durch Mrs. Besant wirken, die eben durch sie gewirkt haben. Wenn Sie bedenken, wie kompliziert alles ist in der Strömung, in die sie da hineingestellt worden ist, dann werden Sie manches begreifen gerade an dieser Mrs. Besant. Aber man muß sich schon darauf einlassen, ein wenig Verständnis zu gewinnen für solche Dinge.
Es ist sehr nötig, meine lieben Freunde, daß unser echtes, klares Urteilsvermögen, unser Vermögen, die äußeren Verhältnisse zu überschauen, nicht darunter leidet, daß wir uns auf Okkultismen einlassen, daß wir sozusagen gesunden Menschensinn bewahren in der Beurteilung der äußeren Verhältnisse, uns nicht benebeln lassen durch allerlei Okkultismen. Wir brauchen ein klares Urteil über die Vorgänge des Lebens, das uns befähigt, nicht hereinzufallen auf alle möglichen trüben okkultistischen Scharlatanerien, namentlich auf solche Dinge, bei denen, von gewissen Zentren ausgehend, ganz anderes angestrebt wird als die reine Wahrheit und wo verbreitet werden gewisse Okkultismen, um im Trüben fischen zu können für gewisse Ziele und Zwecke. Und wirklich dringend nötig ist es auch für unsere Bewegung, daß sie eine reine Scheidewand ziehe zwischen ihrem ehrlichen Wahrheitsstreben, das hervorgeht nur aus der Erkenntnis dessen, was in unserer Zeit der allgemeinen Geistesbewegung der Menschheit sich einverleiben muß, und alldem, was sich in vielfach unlauterer Weise gerade jetzt in der Welt geltend macht als Okkultismus, demgegenüber man gar nicht sagen darf, es stehe einem nicht an, sich für die entsprechenden Tatsachen zu interessieren. Man muß schon zwischen dem bloßen Aberglauben, der hereinfällt auf die «Wissenden» — aber im schrecklichsten Sinne «Wissenden» -—, und der Geistesbewegung, die innerhalb unserer Strömung hell bleiben soll, eine Scheidewand ziehen, und man muß immer mehr keinen Zweifel darüber lassen, auf welcher Seite man nicht steht! Das ist durchaus notwendig. Sonst kommt man in einen gewissen Dusel hinein, der die allerschlimmsten Verheerungen anrichten kann. Weil diese Dinge gerade von mehr materialistischer Seite besprochen und bekanntgemacht und ganz gewiß von übelgesinnter Seite mißbraucht werden in der Zukunft, um allem Okkultismus etwas anzuhaben, möchte ich Sie schon hier heute - ich werde es vielleicht morgen sogar öffentlich tun müssen — auf gewisse Dinge aufmerksam machen, die schon geeignet sind, den Leuten über manches die Augen zu öffnen, und die notwendig machen zu betonen, mit was für Dingen, die oftmals als Okkultismus angesehen werden, wir nichts zu tun haben wollen, damit wir gerüstet und gewappnet sind, wenn der Augenblick kommen sollte, wo man mit diesen trüben Dingen dasjenige zusammenwerfen wird, was ehrliches geisteswissenschaftliches Streben ist.
Nehmen Sie eine solche Tatsache — wie gesagt, ich erwähne diese Dinge aus dem Grunde, weil sie heute eben bekannt werden, und weil wir nötig haben, dazu zu sagen, wie wir darüber denken -: In Paris lebt, ganz klar im Zusammenhange mit den Bestrebungen gewisser geheimer Orden, eine Persönlichkeit, die mediale Eigenschaften hat, deren mediale Eigenschaften auf die Menschen wirken, die bewundert wird als ein bedeutungsvolles Medium, die aber eben im Zusammenhange mit okkulten Strömungen der charakterisierten Art steht und, zum Teil bewußt, zum Teil unbewußt, solche okkulten Strömungen durch sich wirken läßt. Diese okkulte Persönlichkeit gibt ein Jahrbuch heraus: In dem Jahrbuch für 1913, das schon 1912 erschienen ist, lesen wir mit Bezug auf Österreich: Derjenige, welcher glaubt zu regieren in der Zukunft, wird nicht regieren, aber ein anderer, junger, wird regieren, von dem man noch nicht glaubt, daß er regieren werde. — Und in dem Jahrbuch, das 1913 für 1914 erscheint, wird diese Behauptung in noch deutlicherer Weise wiederholt.
Diejenigen, die sich gerne beduseln lassen wollen, können ja, wenn sie wollen, die große Prophetengabe dieses Pariser Mediums bewundern, Aber derjenige, der mehr hell ist in seinem Geistesleben, der möchte doch auch solche Fäden ziehen, wie diese, die da sichtbar werden. Wenn man nun ein gewisses Blatt nimmt, das in Paris erscheint und das sich ja vielleicht vergleichen läßt mit der «B. Z. am Mittag» — «Paris Midi» heißt das Blatt -, da ist nun, nicht weit entfernt in der Zeit von jener Behauptung des Almanachs, schon im Jahre 1913 der entschiedene Wunsch ausgedrückt worden, der österreichische Erzherzog Ferdinand möge ermordet werden. — Und in demselben Blatt ist ausgesprochen — in der Zeit, als die dreijährige Dienstzeit in Frankreich verhandelt wurde -, daß, wenn es zu einer Mobilisierung kommen würde, in den ersten Tagen der Mobilisierung Jaures ermordet werden würde! Halten Sie das zusammen mit allen jenen Firlefanzereien, die jetzt gemacht werden, um möglichst einen Schleier zu breiten über die Geheimnisse, die hinter der Ermordung Jaure&s’ stehen, und damit, daß die Persönlichkeit, die jenen Almanach herausgegeben hat, in den ersten Tagen der Mobilisierung, im August 1914, nach Rom gefahren ist, um dort gewisse Kreise zu beeinflussen im antimitteleuropäischen Sinne. Halten Sie alle diese Tatsachen zusammen und versuchen Sie dann ein Urteil zu bilden, ob Sie es hier mit einer Prophetie zu tun haben oder mit etwas wesentlich anderem, was ich Ihnen wohl nicht weiter zu charakterisieren brauche. Aber studieren Sie daran, in wessen Dienst manchmal derjenige steht, der sich beduseln läßt und wenn da oder dort so etwas auftritt, wie in jenem Almanach, das sich später erfüllt, dann einfach von Prophetie spricht! Helles, klares Urteil ist schon notwendig, wenn man bedenkt, was an Unlauterkeit sich an die Rockschöße des Okkultismus hängt.
Und wir können weiter zurückblicken. Diese westeuropäischen Orden haben ihre Abgesandten vom Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts an in Rußland drüben gehabt. Die Leute werden sagen, in Rußland hat man die maurerischen Orden oder dergleichen nicht geduldet. - Um so mehr haben sie im Geheimen geblüht und um so stärkere Früchte haben sie getragen, und derjenige, der einmal die Geschichte der Slawophilen und des Panslawismus studieren wird, der wird die Quellen in jenen russischen Geheimbünden zu suchen haben. Wenn man einen erwischt hat, hat man ihn ja da- oder dorthin geschickt oder füsiliert; aber stattgefunden hat es, daß der Ihnen charakterisierte westeuropäische Okkultismus verbunden wurde mit dem russischen Geistesleben.
Man muß schon hineinsehen in die tieferen Zusammenhänge, die bestehen, wenn man ein Urteil über die Vorgänge der Welt haben will. Und wenn auch jetzt, solange wir gewissermaßen blockiert sind, über die Sache wenig gesprochen werden kann, auch deshalb, weil einige Daten fehlen würden: es wird schon die Zeit kommen, wo man sehen wird, welche Rolle bei der ganzen westeuropäischen Kriegsentfesselung gerade jene westeuropäischen Orden spielen, deren Fäden — und mehr als Fäden! — hineingehen in die englischen Ministerien, in die Pariser Ministerien und so weiter, und wie diese maurerischen Orden eine große Rolle gespielt haben namentlich in Westeuropa, als es sich darum handelte, den Anschluß Italiens an die sogenannte Entente zu bewirken. Die waren sehr, sehr eifrig, und waren wiederum mit gewissen Verbindungen Osteuropas in gutem Zusammenhang. Von den deutschen Maurern der niederen und höheren Grade, die ja in einem internationalen Weltenbunde selbstverständlich mit den anderen immer verbunden waren, «brüderliche Grüße» ausgetauscht haben, brüderliche Zusammenarbeit betont haben, von ihnen kann allerdings zur Entlastung gesagt werden, daß sie zu dumm waren, von der ganzen Geschichte nichts geahnt haben, in die sie eingefügt waren. Das muß man auch zu ihrer Entlastung ganz entschieden hervorheben. Und das ist die bedeutungsvollste Eigenschaft dieses mitteleuropäischen Maurertums, daß es düpiert worden ist bis zum letzten Moment, wie ja manche andere auch, die nicht gerade im Maurertum darin gestanden haben und von denen auch die Möglichkeit vorhanden gewesen wäre, daß sie sich vielleicht nicht hätten düpieren lassen.
Wie oft mußte im Laufe der Zeit hervorgehoben werden, daß man sich einlassen soll auf die Betrachtung solcher Zusammenhänge und daß man namentlich gerade dann, wenn man sich in den Okkultismus einläßt, klares Urteil wird bewahren müssen. Jetzt liegt schon einmal die Notwendigkeit vor, in unserem Kreise auf solche Dinge aufmerksam zu machen. Vieles, was gesagt worden ist, was im Laufe der Jahre so eingeflossen ist, ist nur allzuwenig berücksichtigt worden, man hat allzuwenig auf die Dinge hingehört. Daher gibt es schon manches in unserer Bewegung, was einen gerade in unserer gegenwärtigen Zeit mit Betrübnis erfüllen kann. Unsere mitteleuropäische Bewegung ist wirklich auf einer anderen Basis begründet als andere ähnliche Bewegungen. Denken Sie nur einmal an das eine, daß wir unsere mitteleuropäische Bewegung ja schon vergleichen können mit einem lebendigen Wesen. Sie hat die Eigenschaft eines lebendigen Wesens. Wenn man einen Verein gründet, an den die Leute sich anschließen und aus dem sie wieder austreten, so ist dieser Verein nicht zu vergleichen mit einem lebendigen Wesen. Es ist gewiß vieles falsch von dem, was Weismann gesagt hat über ein lebendiges Wesen, aber das eine ist richtig: daß ein lebendiges Wesen einen Leichnam zurückläßt, wenn es seine Seele zurückzieht. Das trifft genau auf unsere Gesellschaft zu, in anderer Weise als auf andere Gesellschaften. Unsere Gesellschaft hat das Lebendige in sich, daß sie unsere Zyklen an die Mitglieder abgibt, die nun bei den Mitgliedern sind. Wenn eine andere Vereinigung sich auflöst, so gehen die Mitglieder auseinander, da bleibt kein Leichnam zurück. Man kann die schönsten Ideale haben und kann ruhig wieder auseinandergehen. Denken Sie aber, wenn wir auseinandergehen: die ganze Summe der Zyklen bleibt zurück. Das ist der Leichnam! Das ist das Zeugnis dafür, daß wir nicht auf strohernen Prinzipien, auf Programmen, sondern auf etwas Lebendigem begründet sind. Dieses andere wird derjenige, der die Sache betrachten will, schon finden. Und außerdem mußte unsere ganze Bewegung die Form annehmen, die sie angenommen hat. Wie schwer, wie unendlich schwer war es, ich möchte sagen, unser Schiffchen hindurchzusteuern durch all die Klippen, die Sie jetzt ein bißchen erkennen werden, wenn Sie auf all das schauen, was notwendig war, um das, was in Mitteleuropa sich geltend machen mußte, aus Westeuropas Umgarnung, die von Anfang an da war, herauszureißen und zu befreien. Und solchem gegenüber kann es einen schon etwas betrüben, wenn gerade in der heutigen ernsten, schicksaltragenden Zeit vielfach innerhalb unserer Bewegung die Tatsache hervorgetreten ist, daß die persönlichen Streitigkeiten seit dem Kriegsbeginne nicht nur nicht abgenommen haben, sondern in vermehrter Weise wuchern, in furchtbarer Weise eigentlich wuchern. Dieses Hingelenktsein der Seele auf die persönlichen Angelegenheiten gegenüber dem Großen der Bewegung, das ist ja so stark aufgetreten gerade in dieser Zeit. Es hat etwas Betrübliches, meine lieben Freunde, daß in dieser Zeit sich so wenig das Bewußtsein zeigt, daß man doch wahrhaftig nicht wie bei einem gewöhnlichen Verein innerhalb dieser Bewegung darinsteht und daß man nicht wie aus einem gewöhnlichen Verein austritt, wenn einem dies oder jenes nicht paßt! Wir können nicht dagegen geltend machen, so und so viele seien unschuldig an dem, was so geschieht; sondern gerade wenn man auf okkultem Boden steht, müssen die Tatsachen berücksichtigt werden.
Demgegenüber muß schon gesagt werden: Wenn diese Dinge möglich sind und geschehen sind, dann läßt sich in der Form, wie die Gesellschaft besteht, nicht weiterarbeiten in der Gesellschaft! — Es läßt sich nicht weiterarbeiten, wenn nicht das Bewußtsein Platz greift, daß diese Gesellschaft etwas Lebendiges, etwas Wahrhaftiges und kein Verein ist, aus dem man austreten kann, wenn einem etwas nicht paßt. Selbstverständlich kann niemand zurückgehalten werden. Darauf kommt es aber nicht an bei dem, was ich jetzt sage. Wenn das Bewußtsein davon nicht existiert, dann kann man nur sagen, müssen die Dinge, die erreicht werden sollen in unserer Geisteskultur, eben auf andere Weise erreicht werden als durch die Gesellschaft, die dann nur ein Hindernis ist. Dasjenige, was durch unsere Bewegung gehen muß und was alles andere richtig machen wird, das ist das reinste, ehrliche Wahrheitsstreben, aber bloß dieses, bloß das reinste Wahrheitsstreben. Denn zunächst haben wir die Aufgabe, durch dieses reine Wahrheitsstreben ein neues Element in die Geistesentwickelung der Menschheit hineinzubringen. Daher ist es schon notwendig, daß gewisse Dinge zunächst eingesehen werden.
Es ist keine untergeordnete Sache, wenn ich auf so etwas, wie das Folgende, aufmerksam mache. Immer wieder kommt es vor — aber man betrachtet das auch so wie eine untergeordnete Tatsache —, daß der oder jener zu mir kommt und nicht um irgend etwas frägt, was sich auf das seelische Leben oder dergleichen bezieht, sondern etwas, was man den Arzt frägt. Da muß ich immer darauf aufmerksam machen: Man soll sich vertrauensvoll an diejenigen ärztlichen Persönlichkeiten wenden, die innerhalb unserer Gesellschaft da sind. — Das ist notwendig. Selbstverständlich ist es richtig, daß die reinste Arzneikunst und die richtigste Medizin im Zusammenhang mit unserer Bewegung stehen. Aber wenn mir selbst dasjenige Feld ordentlich verbleiben soll, durch das ich wirken soll, dann muß von meiner Person freigehalten werden alles dasjenige, was mit ärztlichen Ratschlägen zusammenhängt. Und schon deshalb ist das notwendig, weil klar werden muß, daß das auch eine Art von Einlullen ist, wenn man sagt: Die offizielle Medizin da draußen, die ist ja nichts, also wendet man etwas anderes an. — Vielmehr kommt es uns darauf an oder soll es uns wenigstens darauf ankommen, daß wir dasjenige, was wir versuchen wollen, nicht unter der Hand, sondern in ehrlicher, offener Weise machen, und daß nicht die Tendenz bei uns herrscht, Gesetze oder äußere Usancen zu umgehen. Vielmehr handelt es sich darum, solche äußeren Zustände herbeizuführen, die es erst möglich machen, daß vernünftiges Gehaben und Gebaren in der Menschheitsentwickelung Platz greift. Es muß jeder wissen, daß er, wenn er nicht durch die offizielle Medizin kuriert werden will, vor allen Dingen das Seine beizutragen hat, daß die Tyrannis der offiziellen Medizin aufhört, und er soll nicht vorher auf allerlei Schleichwegen eine Kuriererei aufsuchen. Selbstverständlich trifft das nicht den einen oder anderen, der gerade seine Tätigkeit auf diesen Zweig wendet; es trifft ihn sogar so, daß das gerade das Richtige ist. Aber es ist notwendig, daß man auch ganz ernst nehme, was ich immer wieder und wieder betone: Man wende sich an unsere ärztlichen Persönlichkeiten, wenn es sich um Arzneikunde handelt. Selbstverständlich findet jeder bei mir einen freundschaftlichen Rat, wenn er den haben will; aber die Richtung, in der prinzipiell dasjenige liegen muß, was uns vonnöten ist, die muß doch heute verstanden werden.
Ich habe versucht, Ihnen einiges wenigstens skizzenhaft zu geben, was Ihnen wichtig sein kann und was auch den Blick schärfen kann für verschiedene Dinge, die notwendigerweise geschehen mußten. Es könnte schon auch gut sein, wenn man ein bißchen darüber nachdenken würde, daß doch ein tieferer Zusammenhang war in jenem rechtzeitigen Loslösen unserer mitteleuropäischen Geistesbewegung von all dem Blech, das sich zuletzt in die Besant-Richtung hineingeschoben hat und das sich jetzt in einer so sonderbaren Weise bis zu den schlimmsten Verleumdungen entlädt. Denn das darf doch noch gesagt werden, obwohl ich, wie gesagt, durchaus nicht alte Streitigkeiten aufwärmen will: Unter den Dingen, die jetzt Mrs. Besant in ihrer englischen Zeitschrift abdruckt, befindet sich zum Beispiel die Lächerlichkeit, daß sie sagt, das Bestreben von mir wäre gewesen, möglichst zum Präsidenten der ganzen Theosophical Society gewählt zu werden, um nach Indien zu kommen und sie, Mrs. Besant, dort zu verdrängen von ihrem Wirkungskreise, und der eigentliche Grund, warum das angestrebt worden wäre von mir, der wäre gewesen, daß ich und die anderen, die zu mir gehören, eigentlich Agenten der deutschen Regierung wären, die nichts geringeres angestrebt hätten, als durch allerlei okkulte Machinationen eine Art Pangermanismus an die Stelle des Angelsachsentums zu setzen und von Indien aus namentlich die englische Regierung aus dem Sattel zu heben! Diese Dinge sind in viel schärferer Form jetzt in Artikeln von Mrs. Besant zu finden. Sie weiß auch auf anderen Gebieten noch solches Blech zu reden, das sich würdig dem Alcyone-Blech an die Seite setzen kann. Allerdings hört man jetzt, daß Alcyone abgesetzt worden sein soll von der Würde, der Christus-Träger zu werden. Na, um Alcyone einzusetzen, hat man andere abgesetzt, nicht wahr! Es war ja immer nach Bedürfnis der eine oder andere eingesetzt worden. Sogar der russische Thronfolger war ja schon in gewissen esoterischen Kreisen mit der Würde bedacht worden, der Christus-Träger zu werden, der junge Alexej! Der vorherige mußte natürlich abgesetzt werden. Aber es waren vorher schon andere, es gab sogar gleichzeitig verschiedene! Nun ja, wenn der eine das dem anderen nicht sagen darf - so immer angedeutet, geheimnisvoll, nicht wahr -, so kann man ja manches auch gleichzeitig haben!
Aber sehen Sie, wenn man diese Dinge allzu leichtfertig hinnimmt, so beachtet man nicht so etwas wie dieses, das ich doch auch erwähnen will: Es war im Jahre 1909, da bildete sich, als der schlimmste Leadbeater-Besant-Rummel losging — also «das erste Schlimmste» -, eine Gesellschaft, die international sein sollte. Ein langjähriger Freund Mrs. Besants, der ihr früher immer die Bücher korrigiert hat auf die wissenschaftlichen Fehler hin, Mr. Keightley, war dazumal namentlich verbunden mit jener internationalen Gesellschaft, die gegen Besant von Indien aus begründet werden sollte. Dazumal wurde mir geschrieben, ob ich nicht die Präsidentschaft dieser internationalen Gesellschaft annehmen wollte. Sie wurde mir angeboten von Indien aus. 1909 war der Kongreß in Budapest. Vor Zeugen sagte ich damals Mrs. Besant, daß mir diese Präsidentschaft angeboten worden war. Ich habe das allerdings nur einigen Menschen gesagt dann auf dem Schiffe, um ihr gleich darauf zu sagen: Aber ich habe im Verhältnis zu der okkulten Bewegung nichts anderes als einer zu sein, der innerhalb des deutschen Volkstums dasjenige zu vertreten hat, was er zu vertreten hat, und außerhalb von diesem Deutschtum werde ich nicht eine okkulte Stellung irgendwie einnehmen. — Und jetzt wagt sie es, in einer Zeitung zu sagen, es wäre von mir angestrebt worden, von Indien aus zur Präsidentschaft zu gelangen! Ich habe immer von objektiven Unwahrheiten gesprochen in bezug auf zahlreiche Dinge, die Mrs. Besant ausgesprochen hat. Aber wenn man so etwas erlebt, daß ich ihr ausdrücklich gesagt habe, ich wolle innerhalb der Theosophischen Gesellschaft niemals etwas anderes sein als höchstens der Generalsekretär der deutschen Sektion oder etwas, was diese umfaßt, dann braucht man nicht mehr von objektiver Unwahrheit zu reden, sondern dann kann man ruhig sagen: Da liegt von seiten Mrs. Besants nicht eine objektive Unwahrheit, sondern ebenso, wie bei der Jesuiten-Beschuldigung, eine bewußte Lüge vor. Und wer heute Mrs. Besant verteidigen will, muß dasjenige mit nehmen, daß einer, der die Verhältnisse kennt, ihm sagt, er verteidige also eine bewußte Lügnerin. Und wenn man zusammennimmt den Jesuiten-Vorwurf und diese Sache und den ganzen Feldzug jetzt, der aus dem englischen Chauvinismus heraus unternommen wird gegen dasjenige, was hier gewollt wird, dann kann man auch reden von systematischem Lügenfeldzug, der durchaus vorhanden ist.
Wer die Worte zu stark findet, der muß bedenken, daß von mir nie etwas gesagt wird, was Angriffe bedeutet, sondern immer erst gesprochen wird, wenn es Abwehr ist. Das sollten namentlich alle diejenigen berücksichtigen, die immer davon sprechen, man müsse gleiches Recht nach beiden Seiten walten lassen. Bei uns hat man gleiches Recht walten lassen, indem man einfach sich die Augen verschlossen hat — wenigstens hernach — gegen dasjenige, was wahr ist, auch auf unserem Gebiete! Es muß schon einmal diese gegenwärtige, schicksaltragende Zeit dazu führen, die Dinge der Wahrheit gemäß in ihrem vollen, wahren, ehrlichen Ernst anzuschauen und danach zu handeln. Denn das ist doch wahr, daß alle diese Opfer, die jetzt gebracht werden in Hunderten und aber Hunderten von Toden, dann zum Heil der Menschheit vollbracht worden sind, wenn sie hier auf der Erde Seelen finden, die über die Zeit in der richtigen Weise zu denken und zu fühlen verstehen! Das, was sich da oben vorbereitet in der geistigen Welt, wenn es richtig angesehen wird von den Verstehenden, wird dann zu Kräften werden in der Zukunft, welche gerade von verständigen, okkultistisch empfindenden Seelen umgewandelt werden zu vorwärtsbewegenden Kräften in der Menschheit. Wenn es nicht verstanden wird, dann wird in geistiger Beziehung das Ereignis der Gegenwart so vorübergehen, daß gerade diejenigen Kräfte, die da oben sind in der geistigen Welt als Ergebnisse der Hunderte und aber Hunderte von Opfertoden, in die Hände des Ahriman geführt werden. In diesem Zusammenhang sagte ich immer:
Aus dem Mut der Kämpfer,
Aus dem Blut der Schlachten,
Aus dem Leid Verlassener,
Aus des Volkes Opfertaten
Wird erwachsen Geistesfrucht —
Lenken Seelen geist-bewußt<
Ihren Sinn ins Geisterreich.
Fifth Lecture
We want to use this evening more for an occult-historical consideration and turn to a purely human occult consideration the day after tomorrow. If I now wish to start from a question, prompted, as it were, by various necessities that already exist and must be discussed in view of current events, this is really not intended to lead me to rehash old issues or return to old disputes, but rather to say a few things that need to be said. And so I would like to start with a question that I do not intend to answer directly, but which will be answered by various considerations that I will make later. I will start with the question: Why, since the beginning of the war, has Mrs. Besant been slandering our German movement in such an outrageous manner in her English journals? Why did she begin this smear campaign soon after the outbreak of the war, and why is she continuing it in such an unbelievable manner even now? Well, the following considerations will provide some clues to answering these questions.
The lectures that I now have to give in public in connection with our spiritual movement must, of course, be given in such a way that they are understandable to the public. But basically, every sentence that is spoken in this way has a much, much deeper meaning: every sentence is spoken out of the necessity of a certain factual context. And I would like to say something about this factual context today.
I have often pointed out that we live in an age in which something of occult spiritual knowledge must necessarily flow into the entire cultural movement. Now, the occult current, the spiritual-scientific current, has never really been completely cut off from the development of humanity. But one must break with a kind of prejudice, or rather a kind of preconception that is very widespread, even in our ranks, if one wants to judge certain things that one should already know in the right way. One must break — there is no other way to say it — with a certain dreaminess, a certain sleepiness that so easily overtakes those who approach our spiritual movement and want something really cozy for their souls, something that carries them warmly through life, something that they listen to and let work on them, something that makes them feel good. approaches our spiritual science movement and wants something really cozy for their soul, something that carries them warmly through life, something they listen to, something they let affect them in such a way that it warms them up, that they can believe in the higher destiny of the human soul, which is all quite right, but which can also be connected with a certain lulling of the mind. This is observed all too often, especially among those who allow spiritual science to work on their souls and who do not at the same time strive, through what spiritual science can be, to find a clear and certain judgment about the events of life, about the intricacies of the facts within which each individual stands.
Now, when the development of humanity has been discussed, attention has often been drawn to how our fifth post-Atlantean cultural period, in which we live, has the task of developing the consciousness soul out of the general dispositions of the human soul, and how then, in the sixth post-Atlantean period, the spirit self will have to be worked out. And attention has been drawn to how essential it is that certain human predispositions, which are still dormant and slumbering in Eastern Europe today, particularly among the Russian people, play a role if the sixth post-Atlantean cultural epoch is to become effective in the right way. And so it is necessary that certain qualities, which are so deeply rooted in the Russian national soul, that the Russian people, if they are not misled by their “intelligentsia,” are truly imbued with these qualities in their souls. Attention must be drawn to such qualities. This Russian national soul has something in its whole nature that one could almost call feminine, something cuddly, something that easily adapts to take in what cultural development has brought.
This is related to the fact that the Russian people have always absorbed, in the course of their development, what has flowed through Russian culture from ancient times in the form of more oriental, Byzantine religious forms. The Russian national soul has been little productive or creative in the inner sense, but it is eminently receptive. This is why there has been so little development of the Russian Orthodox religion during the centuries in which this Russian-Byzantine-oriented religion has been influential among Russians. Anyone who participates in a ceremony in the Russian Church, even if only temporarily, can sense how infinitely much of an oriental aura pervades these ceremonies, how something aura-like is brought into the immediate present in a tangible way. That is one thing.
Secondly, it is inherent in the Russian national character that the individual Russian has little sense of the forms of thought that are necessary in Western and Central Europe for the structuring and further development of social life. Such a necessity did exist, for example, with the adoption of strict legal thinking in the European social order. But the Russian people have little understanding of this permeation of social life with forms of thought. It confuses them in what they would like to call the free emotional expression of their destiny. They do not want to be confused by any forms of thought woven into the external social structure.
And a third trait is the one that so attracted Herder and which is already deeply connected with what can be called the Russian national soul. This trait was not discovered in Russia itself, that is, it was not emphasized conceptually in Russia, but was originally discovered by Herder, just as Slavism and Pan-Slavism borrowed so much from Herder; this is further proof of the adaptability of Russianness. The third trait is therefore a certain peacefulness, a non-aggressive nature in relation to intellectual life, a more passive, devoted nature. Aggressive advocacy of dogmas or the like is foreign to the Russian people. That is a third characteristic.
Of course, such characteristics can be turned into their opposites by various circumstances—that is precisely what makes human life so complicated—and through the demagogues we are now dealing with, almost all of these three traits have been turned into their opposites. This should not seem surprising to anyone who is familiar with spiritual science.
Thus we see — and we would see it even more clearly if we could study in greater detail what has been outlined here in just a few strokes — that there is material available in Eastern Europe that must, so to speak, flow together with what is emerging in Western Europe from a much more active development. In Western Europe, the opposite characteristics are to be found. It has been pointed out what a certain active development has brought to humanity up to our fifth post-Atlantean period and what must be brought to it further if such things are not overlooked, as was again pointed out yesterday in my lecture on the fading tone of German spiritual life.
For those who can now truly view the development of spiritual life with an open mind — open even when it initially presents itself in the outer physical reality, especially in the present, in the most terrible distortions and caricatures — who can see the inner driving forces of this spiritual life, it is clear that through a certain fact, precisely that which is present in Central European spiritual life must enter into a kind of marriage with that which flows from the Russian natural dispositions. A kind of interaction must take place between what can be produced in Central Europe, I would say, through the peculiarity of this Central European spiritual life, and what can be absorbed through certain purely natural characteristics of the European East.
If you were to study Central European intellectual life more closely, particularly the trait I have just pointed out in this public lecture, you would see that, although spiritual science as such is not yet present in this trait, there is indeed something in it that is the seed of spiritual science. Fichte speaks, as I have often quoted, of a “higher meaning.” Goethe speaks of “intuitive judgment.” Schelling says that the soul must rise, if it truly wants to look into the mysteries of existence, to what he calls “intellectual intuition.” In order to understand things more precisely, one must also draw attention to something that Schelling achieved in his later years in the immensely profound works Philosophy of Mythology and Philosophy of Revelation. A deep understanding of Christianity lives in these works, which are still not understood today. A spiritual conception of the world lives in a work such as Die Gottheiten von Samothrake (The Deities of Samothrace), in which Schelling attempts to penetrate the mysteries of the Samothracian Cabiri. Nowhere in modern intellectual life is the awareness so strong that Christianity is not a collection of dogmas, that what is actually secondary is what is cultivated as Christian dogma, but that the main thing is that the Christ event, the mystery of Golgotha, took place. Nowhere does this strike one as strongly as in Schelling's Philosophy of Revelation. All of this is capable of development, all of this must lead to the development that we have so often outlined when we look thoughtfully at what must be accomplished in Central Europe during the fifth post-Atlantean epoch.
But now to Western Europe! When we look at Western Europe, we must first of all be clear that this West of Europe is permeated everywhere by a historically and traditionally handed-down occultism, which nowhere else emerges in such an organic, life-filled way from what also lives outside in exoteric life, as true modern occultism can emerge from the spiritual current flowing through Goethe, Schelling, Hegel, and so on. What exists in the West as occultism has little connection with what is external science. It would be impossible, for example, to find in England a similar connection between occult science and the actual pursuit of knowledge as is really the case in the worldview of German idealism. It is inconceivable that what is outwardly genuinely English, such as the philosophy of Bacon of Verulam, Spencer, Darwinism with its English coloring, or now, once again, the newer pragmatism, could find its way over to what lives in the various occult orders of the West in the same way as it did in German idealism. What passes through these various occult orders must come to a conclusion; it cannot build a proper bridge to an external, worldly science.
However, in these Western orders, especially in certain high-ranking orders, there is a historically transmitted insight that everyone absorbs within themselves. There is a certain insight, I would say, into the European world situation, whose main secret really lies in the fact just described: that on the one hand, as if out of its very blood, Eastern Europe is destined to receive, but that what lies to the west of Eastern Europe is destined to develop something that is to be received by the East. This insight is definitely present among the leading personalities of the Western orders. Where these leading personalities develop the basic idea of their occult work, they speak quite openly of this connection.
But there is something very specific connected with the development of such fundamental ideas in the West. What is connected with this can best be seen when one follows things where they have become most rigid and conceited: within British monastic life. There lives in everyone who is initiated into certain higher degrees of this British monastic life — certain higher degrees of initiation, which he knows historically, but into which he is not really initiated in a living way — a certain idea, namely, that Anglo-Saxonism must bring forth from its national character that which can be combined with Russian national character to form a kind of spiritual cultural marriage. For everyone who, as I have just characterized, is involved in Anglo-Saxon occultism, regards it as that which must replace the deepest occult driving forces of the Greek-Latin nature. That is how people think. For the fourth post-Atlantean cultural period, which, as we know, came to an end around the 15th century, what was decisive was precisely what Greek and Roman culture, what Greek-Latin culture brought forth in terms of occultism. But in the fifth post-Atlantean culture, this Greek-Latin element must be replaced by Anglo-Saxon culture. This is something that is demanded, something that must be brought about, something that must be realized. And everyone who stands by this dogma, which is at the same time a dogma of will—that the fifth post-Atlantean culture must bear an Anglo-Saxon physiognomy, an Anglo-Saxon character—has at the same time a certain image of the future shape of Europe. They have a picture of the future shape of Europe in which the spiritual life that exists in Central Europe must above all be suppressed as something that must not be allowed to flow into the future of humanity. It must be ignored as an insignificant fact.
This is a more or less unconscious dogma in all Anglo-Saxon orders and, from there, in all orders that have some connection with the “Grand Orient de France,” for example, and in all Western European secret societies. A basic dogma that operates more or less unconsciously is precisely this: This Central European knowledge is not relevant for the fifth post-Atlantic culture, must not be taken into consideration. Everything must be arranged in such a way that the fifth post-Atlantic culture bears an Anglo-Saxon physiognomy. Therefore, a kind of marriage between Western Europe and Eastern Europe must be brought about, with the neglect of Central European life. — In such occult orders, people have been talking for many, many years about the war in which we now live. They did not paint this war as any less terrible than it has turned out to be. It is only a naive belief that this war broke out without many people having foreseen it, as if there had not been much talk about this war. There has been much talk about it! And you find the statement about the coming great European war everywhere, again and again, especially in the Anglo-Saxon orders, quoted and discussed. Again and again, there is the hint that such a great European conflict must come. And people paint pictures of the future situation in Europe. It is known that with the sixth post-Atlantic cultural period, which, in a somewhat materialistic sense, is called the sixth subrace in the Anglo-Saxon sense, the aforementioned characteristics, the blood characteristics, I would say, of the Russian people have something to do with this, and that therefore a kind of convergence of the Western European essence with the Russian essence must be brought about. One must think clearly about these things, one must keep them clearly in mind, otherwise one lives asleep in what is the occult movement of the present.
In connection with this, I would like to draw your attention to a fact. I have not forgotten it, nor can I forget it. When Mrs. Besant made her first trip to us in Central Europe, a meeting was first held with her in Hamburg, where she gave a lecture. At that time, I asked Mrs. Besant a specific question: If we now want to start a Central European occult movement, what about the fact that at the beginning of the 19th century, at the turn of the 18th to the 19th century, significant seeds of a special spiritual life were noticeable precisely in Central Europe? Mrs. Besant replied — naturally, little was understood of the underlying connection —: At that time, something emerged from spiritual knowledge in an abstract, conceptual form within German life; but because humanity had no use for it, it had to be developed later in a purer, higher, truer form within English spiritual life. — It may be unpleasant for some people that such characteristic statements of mine are not forgotten. They will not be forgotten.
Now, in the last third of the 19th century, a special, extraordinarily significant phenomenon presented itself in relation to the occult development of Europe, and even extended to America. And this phenomenon, which outwardly appears to be merely a personality, has a much greater significance than one is usually inclined to assume. This phenomenon confronts us in the personality of Helena Petrovna Blavatsky. Outwardly, the fact already exists—but this extraordinary fact is only the expression of deep inner spiritual connections—that Helena Petrovna Blavatsky emerged from Russian folklore, with all the characteristics of this Russian folklore, but developing from this great, mediumistic spiritual qualities, above all psychic qualities to the highest degree.
One must have some idea of what the appearance of such a phenomenon means in the occult development of humanity if one wants to appreciate such a phenomenon fully, if one wants to follow with understanding what I am about to say, for example. In the Anglo-Saxon, Western orders, secret societies, and so on, which were concerned with occult ideas, as I have just characterized, a lively activity arose when it became known that there was such a unique personality who, coming directly from the most characteristic Russian folk tradition, was revealing future characteristics of human evolution concentrated in outstanding psychic qualities and in a completely unique mediumship. There was movement everywhere. A life eager for questions arose in these Anglo-Saxon-Western orders. What emerged as a pressing life can be expressed as follows, even if one must naturally simplify things somewhat. The people who are the actual guardians of this Anglo-Saxon-Western movement said to themselves: This means something, that such an individual is awakening in the present from the Eastern humanity; this must be taken into account, and one must take a corresponding position. And now the question really arose: How can we bring something that can reveal certain deep secrets of the world through strong psychic qualities into a channel so that the Russian element of the future can connect with the Anglo-Saxon essence? The aim now was to draw Blavatsky's qualities into the Anglo-Saxon essence. At the very least, the aim was to use Blavatsky's psychic qualities to present to the world those occult dogmas that the Western orders wanted to present to the world. The aim was to show how a certain future science, imbued with occultism, must come about. They wanted to steer people's thinking, which is so easily guided, toward what leads from the fifth to the sixth period, but in such a way that it is initially permeated by the impulses rooted in Anglo-Saxon occultism and its dogmas. Thus, Blavatsky's psychic personality was to be used to push into her what had been handed down historically and lay as articles of faith in Western occultism.
At first, things went as they should, I would say. Blavatsky certainly began to familiarize herself with the occult aspects of Central European spiritual life. What this means will become quite clear to us when we take a closer look at this Central European spiritual life in relation to its occultism. This Central European spiritual life has always brought the occult to the surface. This occultism can even still be recognized in a certain, albeit superficial, literature. It lived on in the 15th, 16th, 17th, and even in the 18th century, until Jesuitism came along and corrupted everything outwardly — but only outwardly. But it did live at that time. And when we speak today of how a deeper striving came to the fore in a certain purely ideal form in the Goethe, Schelling, and Fichte periods, we must also be clear that this deeper striving has its roots in Central European occultism, in a Central European occult development. Helena Petrovna Blavatsky initially entered this stream of Central European occult development through a positive process, so that what I would call the occultism that lived through the later Middle Ages in Central Europe was initially saturated by what came up through the underground channels of the human personality into Blavatsky's psychic life. what had lived through the later Middle Ages in occultism within Central Europe.
But something else had already happened earlier with this Central European occultism. Western occultists are not, of course, merely foolish or stupid; they are even extraordinarily clever in relation to what is sometimes recognized as outward intelligence. However, I do not count Grey and Asquith among these clever people; I do not want to be thought of as counting the current English statesmen among the clever. But there have been extremely important people, especially within the occult orders, who were endowed above all with great intelligence, and with the help of this intelligence it has come about that practically everything that could be adopted externally from Central European occultism has been transferred to England, so that it is reviving there in a literature that is admittedly external and exoteric, but nevertheless extensive.
For those who know things as they are, it is quite clear, when they take anything from Wynn-Westcott or from those English occultists who know something, even if they follow the writings of Laurence Oliphant more closely, what the production of this English occult literature is all about: that they are setting out to give an English, a Western European guise to what was produced in Central Europe and what initially had to recede in Central Europe because a more material development took hold. That is why, I would say, it is so hopelessly saddening to see time and again how certain Germans cannot get enough of pointing out how “English” all real occult endeavors must be, and that as much as possible must be adopted from there. People simply do not know that what came from medieval German culture was carried over there and that they are now bringing it back in an English guise. One could even conduct some amusing research: very amusing research would result, for example, if one were to translate English occult works and then place them alongside the translation of what exists in a much more thorough and serious form in medieval German occult literature. If you put the two together, you would get some grotesque results! It would turn out that very spiritual things within Central European development are covered with a kind of rubble, and that these are being carried back, saturated with British materialism, without anyone knowing that they were first carried over there from Central Europe.
But Helena Petrovna Blavatsky had already immersed herself in what was also alive in medieval occultism. She was not fully conscious of what was happening to her; she was also, to a high degree, a subconsciously psychic nature. But now the desire to bring everything that was powerful for the future into subordination to the Western European-Anglo-Saxon nature lived on. This urge was powerful. And in connection with this urge—I could describe all the individual events to you, but I must sketch them out because we do not have much time—it came about that at a certain time, for example, Blavatsky was induced to join a certain occult order in Paris.
So Blavatsky, with her occult-influenced Russian characteristics on the one hand and imbued with a wealth of real knowledge from Central Europe on the other — whether Rosicrucian or whatever you want to call it — joined a secret society in Paris. There she was now. By virtue of what lived in her soul, she was an immensely strong soul, a soul that strongly brought to bear what lived within her, that did not simply go along with what those occult orders in Paris would have liked, namely that she be regarded only as a higher medium. For what particularly bothered people was this ability to communicate all her occult experiences to the world when she saw fit, since she had taken them into a kind of higher psyche. Otherwise, one could have said to the world: Look, what we have to tell you is not based on theories, but appears through a mediumistic channel; it emerges from a core, from a Russian nature, from the psyche of a personality that is psychic in the highest degree. If one had wanted to carry this out, Blavatsky would of course have had to be a much less headstrong personality. She would not have tolerated that. Hence the fact that she now set conditions in that secret order in Paris, which I do not wish to mention — the time will come to talk about these things — but which again arose from Blavatsky's urge. For she felt that those over there in the West wanted to promote Western domination as far as it could be promoted by occultism — and she would not go along with that! For at that very time, with all the strange things that were happening in that secret order in Paris, she felt strongly Russian and set conditions, which, as I said, I do not wish to mention, for her to remain in the order, conditions that could not be taken into account in the slightest if this order still wanted to have anything to do with the outside world. She set conditions that would have been capable, in a sense, of turning the whole history of France upside down. That is why she was expelled. One had the feeling that she had been expelled just in time, before she learned too much about the secrets of the order.
Then various other events occurred, including the fact that she had now, I would say, acquired a taste for participating in major world events. And so she allowed herself to be accepted into another order, this time an American one. She did not impose the same conditions as in the Paris order, but she behaved in such a way that what she had wanted to achieve in Paris through her open conditions could have been achieved in the American way. And in connection with a man who, in any case, did not like the American conditions of the time very much, in connection with Olcott, she had great plans for American life, plans that put Western occultists, at least those of Anglo-Saxon origin, in a state of mind that can be described as boiling hot! — Boiling hot, it was not so hot for Dr. Faust, not for Richard III, as Goethe once said out of a certain mood. And now, in addition, what had not yet happened in Paris had happened — well, Blavatsky already knew too much, had looked too closely into what was actually intended there! Something had come into being which, if measured by ancient sacred occult rules, was certainly not entirely justifiable, but which had to happen in order to prevent great misfortune that might have come. The things that were planned were being considered at that very time in a meeting of American and European occultists, and after many detours, the measures that had been taken resulted in what is known in occultism as placing someone in occult captivity. This occult imprisonment consists in causing, through certain processes, a person's striving, especially their occult striving, to be enclosed in a sphere so that the person concerned always sees only their own striving reflected back to them and cannot see out of the sphere. Blavatsky was now placed in such an occult sphere. Outwardly, things were arranged so that she was in Asia during this occult imprisonment.
But now the development of humanity brought certain things with it. As I said, what is told is of course not always entirely accurate; that is to say, the details are accurate, but because there is not enough time, things have to be omitted that could perhaps be told another time and that it might be desirable to mention another time. It then happened that leading Indian occultists attempted to promote what was now again of particular political advantage to their Indian people by occult means, namely by rescuing Blavatsky from her occult captivity. And everything that had initially had a Central European flavor, which was then overlaid with everything that people in Western Europe wanted to bring into it, now had an Indian flavor, and a complicated occult experience now played out, so to speak, around poor Blavatsky. One day she was freed from her occult captivity, but everything in her soul that was occult had taken on an Indian coloring. Added to this was the more unconscious influence of Olcott, which ultimately led to these Indian-colored occult elements being made subservient to Anglo-Saxon culture. And so it came about that the former leadership of Blavatsky was replaced by another leader, whom she now, in keeping with the former, also continued to call Koot-Hoomi; but the later, second leader of Blavatsky was, in essence — as those who are initiated into these things know — nothing more than a pipsqueak in Russian service, a personality who pursued completely different goals with all the things he handed down to Blavatsky and her followers than to spread occult knowledge among people in an honest way; a personality who, above all, pursued great political goals, a kind of Russian espionage, and who now wanted to direct and guide the matter in such a way that, from the other side, this spiritual marriage between Russian and Anglo-Saxon culture should come about.
Everything that is so horribly corrupting in some of the extraordinarily great truths contained in The Secret Doctrine can be traced back to these reasons, which are indicated here. It can also be noted that the eminently Russian coloring that came into the whole Blavatsky movement through this later Koot-Hoomi did not suit certain high-ranking English occultists, and how certain occult circles, which are extremely close to the High Church in England, did everything in their power to combat the coloring I have just characterized. . That is a long and complicated story that has unfolded.
It must be clear above all that Helena Petrovna Blavatsky was an extraordinarily significant psychic personality, through whose psyche the most diverse aspirations and currents worked. At that time, especially at the beginning of Blavatsky's public appearance, there was a tendency in many directions to prepare certain political things for the future by, so to speak, dulling people's senses with certain occultisms. Occultists of a certain kind know only too well that — forgive the harsh expression — there is nothing better for making the world stupid than first teaching occultism in a certain way. If these occult teachings are not backed by an absolute tendency toward an honest sense of truth, then the people who have been made stupid by occultism can be led anywhere one wants to take them. This is a tendency of those occultists who belong to the more or less black, gray variety. And such people very often pursue distant political goals, carefully preparing everything long in advance. It is not for nothing that certain secret societies, particularly in Britain but also in France, have repeatedly taught — or at least used to teach — what the future fate of Poland will be and how to behave towards the various aspirations and currents within the Polish people. It is not without reason that it has always been taught how the connection between Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia, and the adjoining territories of the Balkan Peninsula must be established, and how certain political undercurrents must be prepared so that what one wants can be promoted. An enormous amount of politics is being done in the secret orders of Western Europe. I would say that great politics is being done there.
Since Blavatsky never allowed herself to be swayed into promoting pure Anglo-Saxon occultism, she was considered dangerous because she was a psychic personality, for example by the high-ranking occultists who were particularly close to the High Church and who wanted only what I have already indicated. At first, they thought they could have an effect through people who, due to their limited talents and uneducated thinking, were actually clueless in such a movement. They believed they could achieve a great deal by steering Mr. Sinnett's path in a certain way. Under the circumstances I have described, it is possible to guide and steer a person's path if one does not stand on the ground that recognizes as supreme what true occultism must recognize as supreme: the unconditional preservation of human freedom and human dignity. But it must also be repeatedly emphasized that the occultist, or anyone who becomes acquainted with occultism, must keep a watchful eye over his soul, especially with regard to this point. And Mrs. Besant grew into these things quite unsuspectingly, but she also has a strong Anglo-Saxon instinct, and so all these things were able to work through Mrs. Besant, which is precisely what happened. If you consider how complicated everything is in the current situation in which she has been placed, you will understand many things about Mrs. Besant. But one must be willing to gain a little understanding for such things.
It is very necessary, my dear friends, that our genuine, clear judgment, our ability to see through external circumstances, does not suffer from our involvement in occultism, that we preserve, so to speak, a healthy human sense in our assessment of external circumstances, and do not allow ourselves to be clouded by all kinds of occultism. We need a clear judgment about the processes of life that enables us not to fall for all kinds of murky occult charlatanry, especially those things that originate from certain centers and strive for something completely different from the pure truth, and where certain occult practices are spread in order to fish in troubled waters for certain goals and purposes. And it is also urgently necessary for our movement to draw a clear line between its honest striving for truth, which arises solely from the recognition of what must be incorporated into our time of general spiritual movement of humanity, and everything that is currently asserting itself in many dishonest ways in the world as occultism, in relation to which one cannot say that it is not one's business to take an interest in the relevant facts. to be interested in the corresponding facts. One must draw a clear line between mere superstition, which falls prey to the “knowers” — but “knowers” in the most terrible sense — and the spiritual movement that must remain clear within our current, and one must leave no doubt whatsoever about which side one is on! This is absolutely necessary. Otherwise, one falls into a certain daze that can cause the worst devastation. Because these things are discussed and publicized from a more materialistic point of view and will certainly be misused in the future by ill-intentioned people to discredit all occultism, I would like to draw your attention here today — I may even have to do so publicly tomorrow — to certain things which are already capable of opening people's eyes to many things and which make it necessary to emphasize that we want nothing to do with things that are often regarded as occultism, so that we are equipped and armed when the moment comes when these murky things will be thrown together with what is honest spiritual scientific striving.
Take such a fact — as I said, I mention these things because they are becoming known today and because we need to say what we think about them: In Paris, clearly in connection with the efforts of certain secret orders, there lives a personality who has mediumistic abilities that affect people, who is admired as a significant medium, but who is connected with occult currents of the kind I have described and who, partly consciously, partly unconsciously, allows such occult currents to work through her. This occult personality publishes a yearbook: In the yearbook for 1913, which was already published in 1912, we read with reference to Austria: He who believes he will rule in the future will not rule, but another, younger man will rule, whom no one yet believes will rule. — And in the yearbook published in 1913 for 1914, this assertion is repeated in even clearer terms.
Those who like to be deluded can, if they wish, admire the great prophetic gift of this Parisian medium. But those who are more clear-minded will want to pull the strings that are becoming visible here. If we take a certain newspaper published in Paris, which can perhaps be compared to the “B. Z. am Mittag” — the newspaper is called “Paris Midi” —, we find that not long after the almanac made its claim, in 1913, the definite wish was expressed that the Austrian Archduke Ferdinand should be assassinated. And in the same newspaper, at the time when the three-year term of service in France was being negotiated, it was stated that if mobilization were to occur, Jaurès would be assassinated in the first days of mobilization! Consider this together with all the nonsense that is now being made in order to spread a veil over the secrets behind the assassination of Jaurès and with the fact that the person who published that almanac traveled to Rome in the first days of mobilization in August 1914 to influence certain circles there in an anti-Central European sense. Keep all these facts together and then try to form an opinion as to whether you are dealing here with a prophecy or with something else entirely, which I need not characterize further. But study who sometimes serves those who allow themselves to be beguiled, and when something like this occurs here or there, as in that almanac, which later comes true, then simply speak of prophecy! A clear judgment is necessary when one considers the dishonesty that clings to the coattails of occultism.
And we can look further back. These Western European orders have had their emissaries in Russia since the beginning of the 19th century. People will say that Masonic orders and the like were not tolerated in Russia. All the more so did they flourish in secret and bear all the more fruit, and anyone who studies the history of the Slavophiles and Pan-Slavism will have to look for the sources in those Russian secret societies. If one was caught, he was sent here or there or shot; but what happened was that the Western European occultism you described became connected with Russian intellectual life.
One must look into the deeper connections that exist if one wants to have an opinion about world events. And even if little can be said about the matter at present, as long as we are, so to speak, blocked, and also because some data is missing, the time will come when we will see what role in the whole outbreak of war in Western Europe was played by precisely those Western European orders whose threads — and more than threads! go into the English ministries, the Paris ministries, and so on, and how these Masonic orders played a major role, especially in Western Europe, when it came to bringing Italy into the so-called Entente. They were very, very zealous, and in turn had good connections with certain circles in Eastern Europe. The German Freemasons of the lower and higher degrees, who were of course always connected with the others in an international world confederation, exchanged “brotherly greetings” and emphasized brotherly cooperation. In their defense, it can be said that they were too stupid to have any idea of the whole story in which they were involved. This must be emphasized quite emphatically in their defense. And this is the most significant characteristic of this Central European Masonry, that it was duped until the very last moment, as were many others who were not directly involved in Masonry and who might have had the opportunity not to allow themselves to be duped.
How often has it had to be emphasized over time that one should engage in the consideration of such connections and that, especially when engaging in occultism, one must maintain clear judgment. Now it is necessary to draw attention to such things within our circle. Much of what has been said, what has been incorporated over the years, has been given too little consideration; too little attention has been paid to these things. Therefore, there are already some things in our movement that can fill us with sadness, especially in our present time. Our Central European movement is truly founded on a different basis than other similar movements. Just think of the fact that we can already compare our Central European movement to a living being. It has the characteristics of a living being. When you found an association that people join and leave again, this association cannot be compared to a living being. Much of what Weismann said about a living being is certainly wrong, but one thing is right: that a living being leaves behind a corpse when it withdraws its soul. This applies precisely to our society, in a different way than to other societies. Our society has the living element in that it passes on its cycles to its members, who are now with the members. When another association dissolves, the members go their separate ways, leaving no corpse behind. One can have the most beautiful ideals and still go their separate ways. But think about it: when we go our separate ways, the sum total of the cycles remains behind. That is the corpse! That is the proof that we are not based on straw principles or programs, but on something alive. Those who want to look at the matter will find this other thing. And besides, our entire movement had to take the form that it has taken. How difficult, how infinitely difficult it was, I would say, to steer our little ship through all the cliffs that you will now begin to recognize when you look at all that was necessary to tear out and liberate what had to assert itself in Central Europe from the entanglements of Western Europe that had been there from the beginning. And in the face of this, it can be somewhat disheartening when, especially in these serious, fateful times, it has become apparent in many quarters within our movement that personal disputes have not only not diminished since the beginning of the war, but have proliferated, proliferated in a terrible way. This fixation of the soul on personal matters as opposed to the greatness of the movement has been particularly strong in this period. It is sad, my dear friends, that at this time there is so little awareness that one is not really standing within this movement as in an ordinary association, and that one does not leave an ordinary association if one does not like this or that! We cannot argue that so many are innocent of what is happening; but precisely when one stands on occult ground, the facts must be taken into account.
On the other hand, it must be said that if these things are possible and have happened, then it is impossible to continue working in society in its present form! — It is impossible to continue working unless the awareness takes hold that this society is something living, something true, and not a club that one can leave if one does not like something. Of course, no one can be held back. But that is not the point of what I am saying now. If this awareness does not exist, then one can only say that the things that are to be achieved in our intellectual culture must be achieved in a different way than through society, which is then only an obstacle. What must pass through our movement and what will make everything else right is the purest, most honest striving for truth, but only this, only the purest striving for truth. For we have the task, first of all, of bringing a new element into the spiritual development of humanity through this pure striving for truth. It is therefore necessary that certain things be understood first.
It is no minor matter when I draw attention to something like the following. It happens again and again — but people regard it as a minor fact — that someone comes to me and does not ask about anything relating to the soul life or the like, but something that one would ask a doctor. I always have to point out that people should turn with confidence to the medical professionals who are available within our society. That is necessary. Of course, it is right that the purest art of healing and the most appropriate medicine are connected with our movement. But if I am to retain the field in which I am to work, then everything connected with medical advice must be kept away from me. This is necessary because it must be clear that it is a kind of lulling to say: Official medicine out there is worthless, so we use something else. — Rather, it is important to us, or at least it should be important to us, that we do what we want to try not secretly, but in an honest and open manner, and that we do not tend to circumvent laws or external customs. Rather, it is a matter of bringing about external conditions that make it possible for reasonable behavior and conduct to take hold in human development. Everyone must know that if they do not want to be cured by official medicine, they must above all contribute to ending the tyranny of official medicine, and they should not first seek out all kinds of secret cures. Of course, this does not apply to one or the other who happens to be working in this field; in fact, it is precisely the right thing for them to do. But it is necessary to take very seriously what I emphasize again and again: turn to our medical personalities when it comes to medicine. Of course, everyone will find friendly advice from me if they want it; but the direction in which what we need must lie in principle must be understood today.
I have tried to give you at least a rough outline of what may be important to you and what may also sharpen your awareness of various things that had to happen. It might also be good to think a little about the fact that there was a deeper connection between the timely detachment of our Central European spiritual movement from all the tinsel that ultimately pushed its way into the Besant direction and is now discharging itself in such a strange way, even to the point of the worst slander. For this must still be said, although, as I have said, I do not wish to rehash old disputes: Among the things that Mrs. Besant now prints in her English magazine is, for example, the ridiculous claim that my aim was to be elected president of the entire Theosophical Society in order to come to India and oust her, Mrs. Besant, from her sphere of influence, and that the real reason why I would have sought this was that I and the others who belong to me were actually agents of the German government, who sought nothing less than to replace Anglo-Saxonism with a kind of Pan-Germanism through all kinds of occult machinations and, from India, to unseat the English government in particular! These things can now be found in much sharper form in articles by Mrs. Besant. She also knows how to talk such nonsense in other areas, which is worthy of Alcyone's nonsense. However, one now hears that Alcyone is said to have been deposed from the dignity of becoming the Christ bearer. Well, in order to install Alcyone, others have been deposed, haven't they! It was always the case that one or the other was installed according to need. Even the Russian heir to the throne had already been considered in certain esoteric circles for the dignity of becoming the Christ bearer, the young Alexei! The previous one had to be deposed, of course. But there had been others before, there were even several at the same time! Well, if one is not allowed to tell the other—as is always implied, mysteriously, isn't it?—then one can have several things at the same time!
But you see, if one accepts these things too lightly, one overlooks something like this, which I would also like to mention: It was in 1909, when the worst Leadbeater-Besant hype began — that is, “the first worst” — that a society was formed that was supposed to be international. A long-time friend of Mrs. Besant, who used to correct her books for scientific errors, Mr. Keightley, was at that time associated with the international society that was to be founded against Besant from India. At that time, I was asked whether I would accept the presidency of this international society. It was offered to me from India. In 1909, the congress was held in Budapest. In front of witnesses, I told Mrs. Besant at the time that I had been offered this presidency. However, I only told a few people on the ship, and then immediately told her: But I have no connection with the occult movement other than to represent within German culture what it has to represent, and outside of this German culture I will not take up any occult position whatsoever. — And now she dares to say in a newspaper that I sought to attain the presidency from India! I have always spoken of objective untruths in relation to numerous things that Mrs. Besant has said. But when one experiences something like this, that I expressly told her that I never wanted to be anything else within the Theosophical Society than at most the general secretary of the German section or something that encompasses this, then one no longer needs to speak of objective untruth, but can calmly say: There is not an objective untruth on Mrs. Besant's part, but, just as in the Jesuit accusation, a deliberate lie. And anyone who wants to defend Mrs. Besant today must accept that someone who knows the circumstances is telling him that he is defending a deliberate liar. And if one takes together the Jesuit accusation and this matter and the whole campaign now being waged out of English chauvinism against what is wanted here, then one can also speak of a systematic campaign of lies, which is definitely taking place.
Those who find these words too strong must bear in mind that I never say anything that constitutes an attack, but always speak only in defense. This should be taken into account especially by those who always talk about the need to apply the same standards to both sides. We have applied equal rights by simply closing our eyes—at least afterwards—to what is true, even in our own domain! This fateful time must lead us to look at things in their full, true, honest seriousness and to act accordingly. For it is true that all these sacrifices, which are now being made in hundreds and hundreds of deaths, will have been accomplished for the good of humanity if they find souls here on earth who understand how to think and feel in the right way about this time! What is being prepared up there in the spiritual world, when viewed correctly by those who understand, will then become forces in the future, which will be transformed by intelligent, occult-sensitive souls into forces that will move humanity forward. If this is not understood, then in a spiritual sense the events of the present will pass in such a way that precisely those forces that are up there in the spiritual world as the result of hundreds and hundreds of sacrificial deaths will be led into the hands of Ahriman. In this connection I have always said:
From the courage of the fighters,
From the blood of battles,
From the suffering of the forsaken,
From the sacrifices of the people
The fruits of the spirit will grow —
Souls guided by spiritual consciousness<
Will turn their minds to the spiritual realm.