Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

Spiritual-Scientific Consideration of Social and Pedagogic Questions
GA 192

1 May 1919, Stuttgart

III. Esoteric Prelude to an Exoteric Consideration of the Social Question II

The last time we gathered here I was able to speak to you of the deep foundations underlying the ideas of the Threefold Commonwealth. I was able to carry the lecture far enough for us to see in what sense one may say that we are living at the present time in a definite period of transition. You will not misunderstand that remark, for I have often told you that when I talk of a transition it is not meant in the trivial sense in which people often speak when they talk about living in a period of transition. Naturally as I have often said, every period is a period of transition from what went before to what is to follow. The essential thing is to direct our attention to what is changing. And from that point of view there are more important and less important moments in the great world evolution of mankind. And it is clear that beneath the surface, as it were, of outer events something is happening in our time with respect to enormously important impulses of human evolution. In my last lecture I drew your attention to the fact that one must see into the so-called unconscious, or subconscious, of the human being if one would recognize what is really vitally involved in the transition mankind is undergoing today. Not much in our consciousness today tells us about the evolution of mankind in general, although we are living precisely in that world-age in which a development of the consciousness-soul is normal for the individual. Mankind as a whole, as distinguished from the individual, is in this age passing through a development of inner soul and spiritual forces, and for that reason the development is more in the subconscious. For mankind as a whole we must look for the most important forces of transition in the subconscious; while for the individual, we will find the most important forces today in the tendency to develop complete consciousness. In the individual an instinctive, more naive soul-life is changing more and more to a conscious soul-life; in mankind as a whole, however, an important change is taking place unconsciously, without the individual often being aware of it unless he has deepened his vision by work in spiritual science.

This vital change, this most important happening, is not so easy to describe, for our language has been made fundamentally for the purpose of reproducing outer sense reality in the soul. This makes it difficult for us to describe precisely, or adequately, something that does not belong to sense reality, but to supersense existence. Often one has to make use of comparisons—not abstract ones but such as you are well acquainted with in spiritual science, where one phenomenon of life is placed by the aide of another so that one will throw light on another. If such comparisons are used it must at the same time be made very clear that only flexible thinking, thinking that does not stamp the concepts, the words, into a set shape, in really compatible with the sense of what is presented. If I want to characterize the most important thing that is happening to mankind as a whole at the present moment of world evolution (I have already pointed it out) I must compare it with the experience that an individual has (consciously, however) when he crosses the threshold, as it is called, into the supersense world. You all know from the description I have given of this individual experience in my book Knowledge of the Higher Worlds and Its Attainment that the crossing of the threshold is an event of deepest significance for the human being. On this side of the threshold is the sense world for man's consciousness, and on the other, the supersense world. Truly, on that other side everything is different from things of the sense world here. And man experiences something there that is named by those who went through the same experience in the manner of former ages in the significant words, “passing through the gate of death”. Indeed, he who crosses the threshold has to learn to know death in its reality. He has to become acquainted with death in its meaning for humanity.

Now you know from the description which I have given in Knowledge of the Higher Worlds that in this crossing of the threshold the entire soul being of man goes through a transformation—but only, of course, for those times in which one remains consciously in the supersense world. The constitution of soul that one has here in the sense world, that is suited to life, to work and action, in the sense world: one cannot come into the supersense world with that. Here in the sense world our soul forces are as it were melted together, so that we never have the experience in our sense life of these soul forces being separated. Anyone who did not have a certain amount of willing in his soul at the same time that he was thinking, even though in a latent form, would not be really healthy physically. We are not in a position in our sense life to separate these three soul forces one from another, so that really we never develop a pure isolated thought, or a pure isolated feeling, or a pure isolated willing. In our conceptions, feelings, actions, and will, these three soul forces are still interwoven always, mixed up with one another. But as soon as we cross the threshold into the supersense world—that is, as soon as we get our soul to the stage where we are actually surrounded by supersense beings, by supersense deeds of these beings, just as formerly we were surrounded by a world of sense things and sense happenings—then, my friends, then there takes place in our soul an absolute separation of thinking, feeling, and willing. As you hove been able to gather from the description in Knowledge of the Higher Worlds, a man must have so schooled himself that he is able then to summon sufficient power to hold together with his ego these three elements of the soul life, thinking, feeling, and willing:—otherwise he would split up into three persons.

Yes, my dear friends, one meets with a significant experience of inner activity when one has crossed the threshold; this finding oneself within in the most enhanced activity of the ego, in the highest manifestation of the ego, for the purpose of holding together the separated soul forces, thinking, feeling, and willing. And that accounts for the fear that a faint- hearted man today feels: fear of actual supersense knowledge, fear before the highest kind of inner soul activity. He would like all of his activity to be of such a kind as is aroused by the outer world and has effect in the outer world. Inner activity is not yet natural to him; more and more it must be developed by him for the future. And so, because at first this development is a task, because it is not actually already inherent, man is afraid, man is cautious about entering the supersense world. Unconsciously he is afraid of himself (if I may so express it) in face of the exertion necessary there to hold the separated soul forces together.

I am picturing this inner experience of the individual in order to have some way by which to characterize for you that which is happening in this age inside the soul life—and you know that one can speak of such a thing—of mankind as a whole. That which I have just described as an individual's experience when crossing the threshold into the supersense world is naturally a fully conscious experience for him, much more so then any conscious experience of his ordinary waking day consciousness. It is a heightened consciousness in which one crosses the threshold and in which one perceives in the supersense world the threefold nature of the human soul being. Something similar to that—but now not consciously—the whole of mankind is going through in the present age as a cosmic historical experience. It is not noticed, this unconscious process that is going on in all mankind, unless one in studying consciously in spiritual science. You know our age is the fifth since the great Atlantean catastrophe which made the configuration of our earth surface as it now exists. We are living in the fifth post-Atlantean period; and in this period mankind must go through in its evolution as a whole something similar to what the crossing of the threshold into the supersense world is for an individual. Mankind as a whole, I said, in its cosmic—or we can say if we like terrestrial—evolution, is crossing a threshold on one side of which, or in other words, for the time preceding which, an entirely different kind of world conception and knowledge was necessary for mankind as a whole than is necessary on the other side, or in other words, for the time afterward.

This process going on in the unconscious of all mankind today is what one must discover through spiritual science. It shows also how necessary spiritual science is to mankind today. For the crossing of this threshold must truly not remain in the unconscious. Men must become aware of it, otherwise they will sleep right through, or at least dream right through, an event that is very important for them. And this fifth post-Atlantean period is the very period in which we should be extending consciousness. But we cannot extend our consciousness of the most vital thing that is happening to mankind in any other way then by rising out of mere sense-science into spiritual science.

If you think about this, my dear friends, you will perhaps remember something that has been said again and again in the course of spiritual scientific, lectures which have been held now for such a long time in Stuttgart.

You remember I have had to emphasize this fact again and again: that Spiritual Science, as it is meant here, is not just something as it were to satisfy an individual's subjective thirst for knowledge. Spiritual Science is something that is connected with the taking up in thought, feeling, and will, of the fundamental impulse of mankind for our time. Therefore activity in spiritual science should not be a mere satisfying of an individual's longing for the newest thing, nor a mere satisfying of his desire, for knowledge. Spiritual Science should be the fulfilling of a certain duty that one has toward mankind as a whole, in order that it shall realize what is going on precisely at this moment in the depths of its evolution.

I showed you when I spoke to you last time that certain individuals who have a degree of external cleverness developed by the scientific training of the present day, are definitely aware of a phenomenon that is present in mankind in this epoch and that corresponds to something in the depths of mankind of which they are not aware. I showed you how such individuals as for example Fritz Mauthner, say that first and foremost in man is his sense perception; and that that is the only true reality of which one can speak. He reflects this reality in its highest form by his creation in art of the beautiful and the sublime. But it does not permit him to arrive at any satisfaction. He wants to penetrate things more deeply. If he tries to penetrate into the being of things through his inner self, then—Mauthner says—he does not arrive at a real contact with the true being of the world, but only comes to dreaming—dreaming which may be pleasing because he imagines it is connected with the central forces of the world, but which nevertheless, so far as knowing is concerned, is after all just dreams, just mysticism. Mysticism then is, for these persons, the second stage of man's inner soul-striving. Then they assert that mysticism is, from their point of view, dream knowledge, they are right, because they deny a supersense knowledge. The third stage, for Fritz Mauthner, is man's struggle to attain knowledge by busying himself with natural laws, historical laws, etc.; and he describes all that as docta ignorantia, on the ground that when we think we know something through science we are not merely dreaming, as in mysticism, but sleeping—sleeping as compared with what would be a real contact with the central forces of the world. Thus persons like Fritz Mauthner think that at the most man has a waking sense perception and can ennoble it through art; that he is doomed to dream when he attempts to connect himself with true reality in religion or mysticism through his inner nature; and that he is doomed to sleep when he believes he is connecting himself with things in any way through science and wisdom.

My dear friends, speaking in an absolute sense, that is all a mistake. But speaking relatively of the special soul-condition that mankind has evolved through the 19th century into the 20th century, speaking quite specifically of this mankind and not of mankind in general, it is a truth. With the means that natural scientific knowledge has made great, by which we have come to such a shipwreck of the social older, with those means the only possible soul life is what Fritz Mauthner has described; that is, the three stages—waking, in sense perception; dreaming, in mysticism; and sleeping, in science.

Such a man as Fritz Mauthner feels the crossing of the threshold by mankind as a whole. Whoever has read his Critique of Speech in which he criticizes not only concepts but speech itself -- or the two thick volumes of his Philosophical Dictionary, or even one or two of the articles in it (it is arranged alphabetically)—that person knows the soul condition he gets into as a result of this very work of Mauthner. I suggest especially—you will perhaps only be grateful for my suggestion from one point of view—that you read the article on “Christianity” in this Dictionary of Philosophy—or the article “Res Publican”, or “Goethe's Wisdom”, or “Immortality”. Everywhere you will have the feeling: first one reads a sentence; in the second sentence what one has just read is modified; in the third the modified statement is again modified; in the fourth one gets back to the first; in the fifth the entire thing is picked up again with all the assertions and modifications included. One undergoes a twisting of one's whole intellectual, rational, and soul system, and it is frightful what one experiences after such a reading. It is a frightful inner soul torture. And if one describes the inner soul torture that a man experiences after such reading—man, that is, who has sufficient courage to admit the final outcome of the present day condition of soul (there are many who have not that courage)—then in the exposing criticism that one would make, and such as I have just made, one will not be censuring Fritz Mauthner, for his very article is a confession that he suffers from the same condition of soul himself. For he says: With human knowledge one can come to nothing else than a kind of “spirit dance” in which one does not discover oneself. He mistakes the lack of knowledge that became necessary in the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century for a supposed absolute incapacity for knowledge in all mankind.

What actually is the truth? Something quite different from what Mauthner believes.

In former ages, as you know, in the clairvoyance of Atlantean times, man did not dream in mysticism but had contact through mystic knowledge with reality. Also, he did not merely sleep in wisdom. We realize from what still remains of older wisdom, Plato, for instance—that they knew things to tell mankind. In Aristotle, that is already no longer true. Mankind of former ages did not have just a docta ignorantia; it had a wisdom in which it was connected with the central forces of he world, that are at the same time the central forces of the human being. But these faculties ebbed away. They had to, in order that man might then seek within himself for those strong powers that were previously given him by spiritual beings without any effort on his part. Today we are crossing the threshold, mankind as a whole; and we must develop out of our inner self the power with which to awaken mysticism, which otherwise by its very nature sleeps within us—by our own power to call mysticism from its dreaming to an experience of the spirit; and also by our inner activity, inner force, to raise what is otherwise dead abstract science to actual experience of supersense spiritual reality. Today, my dear friends, this is in our power. We must undertake the necessary training.

And men who are are willing to accept spiritual science will, like Fritz Mauthner, be obliged to experience the tragic soul condition that has been a necessary accompaniment to the evolving of man's inner forces. Men like Mauthner, who do feel such things and yet are not willing to accept spiritual science, will indeed have to despair of all possibility of contact with the central forces of existence which are at the same time the central forces of the human being. Therefore they will have to despair of the possibility of any knowledge of life. My dear friends, if you think earnestly of what I have just said, will you not have to say to yourselves: Man is confronted today in his evolution, through the fact of his unconscious crossing of the threshold, by a mighty test. It is that indeed. For if he will not develop activity of soul, intense activity of soul, then he is condemned to sink into inactivity, passiveness, and thereby into unbelief in existence—at the very least into some degree of uncertainty—when he considers his place in the whole current of world evolution. That is approximately the soul-condition of men of whom Mauthner is a type.

There are many such men in the present day; but Mauthner had sufficient inner courage to acknowledge it in many writings, while others are in the same condition of soul and do not acknowledge it. He finally had sufficient resignation to retire to Southern Bavaria after he had spent his whole life in journalism as a profession; and there he thought out the Critique of Speech, his book of bitter doubt of human knowledge; then afterwards he wrote his Philosophical Dictionary. He has withdrawn, but he still writes all kinds of articles that truly no more than his book tend to lead to a positive, forceful position within human evolution. They always show a kind of despair of the possibility of one's really comprehending existence, because as a matter of fact one cannot comprehend existence through knowledge. He has finally accepted the consequence, he has given in and withdrawn to a profession that to him is equivalent to journalism, and in which one can be a skeptic, a pessimist.

But there are pupils of Fritz Mauthner who have not been so resigned. Let us ask, what will become definitely, what will become of these pupils who subscribe wholeheartedly to Mauthner's conception of life? They will never be able to arrive at a living comprehension of reality at any comprehension that can penetrate reality fruitfully. They are unable to adapt themselves to life when they are placed in it. Fritz Mauthner got out of it. They only comprehend the sense life, and they believe that anything that goes on outside of that is only a dream or sleep. Look at one of these pupils of Mauthner—Gustav Landauer, for instance—noble, upright, but altogether useless or the social life of the present day. He is a real pupil of Fritz Mauthner. It is not enough today merely to judge life from the surface. We are confronted with tasks that can only be master- edit we are willing to go down into the foundations of life. We may not seek thought impulses today for a new social order—as do such men as I have described—out of whet the time has already brought. No we must seek even social impulses out of the age that is dawning, out of the impulses that are just arising, the impulses of spiritual knowledge. Otherwise we will not arrive at real social impulses. Then when they are found, they can be comprehended, like all spiritual scientific knowledge by a healthy human understanding. It is in such a sense that I wanted to speak of the Threefold Commonwealth.

Today it is essential that men learn to speak in all things with deepest earnestness, first for true self knowledge, secondly for true world knowledge.

Consider Spiritual Science, as it is meant here, from the most varied points of view. Certainly the need for self knowledge and the need for world knowledge are emphasized by it, just as in abstract mysticism and in much abstract occultism. But they are spoken of in a different way. And in that way I should like to write the very heart of our time: One can never attain real self knowledge without seeking this self knowledge through world knowledge. Brooding within oneself does not bring self knowledge. World knowledge must first discipline one so that one can then come to self knowledge. Also, one cannot attain world knowledge without making the way through one's self. World knowledge is not possible without self knowledge. The two things seem to contradict each other, perhaps, but this contradiction is living and fruitful. No world knowledge without self knowledge, no self knowledge without world knowledge. It is like the swinging of a pendulum back and forth. Man must seek continually in his life the swing of the pendulum from self experience to world experience, from world experience to self experience. That will give the strength of soul, that inner activity of soul, which becomes today, and in the future will become, ever more and more necessary to all mankind. Because it is so very easy today for men to brood within themselves, out of a certain egoism that is natural in this age of the development of the consciousness-soul; for that reason they have fallen in love with abstractions. They themselves cannot really judge correctly how strong their love is, in this age, for mere abstractions. For that reason it is all-important—in order to cross the threshold which I have described in the right way—that we arouse ourselves from a mere abstraction-necessity, a mere thought-necessity, to fact. From mere abstract knowledge to an experiencing of fact. To a thinking within ourselves that is not mere thoughts but that sinks us into the things, that thinks with the things and events of the world. Only then can we wake to the present.

I will give you an example of what I mean. But first I would say that, you should not interpret what I am going to say as if, when I have to characterize this or that world conception, I wanted also to take a stand against them. I only want to characterize, not criticize. What one calls “the natural scientific world conception”, or thinking orientated in the direction of natural science, has evolved in a way that I have characterized for you from most varied points of view. It has finally reached such an outlook as Mauthner's; and it has expressed itself in other variations. I wonder whether you remember a man whom I mentioned here once years ago in another connection: the man who wanted to describe the difficulty of self knowledge in one of his books called An Analysis of Experience. He wants to describe the external difficulty of self knowledge, and for that purpose gives two instances of his having been thoroughly illusioned with respect to knowledge of his own external self. Once, he says, he was walking up the street and suddenly someone was approaching him (the writer was a professor), and he thought to himself, “What a strange looking school master that is coming toward me! The person was very unattractive to him, he says. Then he noticed what actually had occurred: he cam in front of a show window and found he was facing himself in the glass. On another occasion he got into an onmibus. Opposite the door by which he entered was a mirror. He was extremely tired. He sw the image and said to himself:“What a funny looking tramp that is coming in the opposite door!” It took him a long time to realize that it was himself. There is the tale, and you will be able to judge that after all here is a man to be taken seriously: Ernst Mach, who from a natural researcher became a philosopher. He has various pupils. His world conception is not unlike Mauthner's except that he came less to uncertainty, less to skepticism; he simply believes in the play-quality of thought. The ego itself is merely a myth to him, as also to Mauthner, only Mach is content. One must study Ernst Mach, and then become acquainted with his life and his whole personality. I remember when I saw him for the first time, in the Vienna Academy of Science, where he was giving a special lecture on the Economy of Thinking, in the course of which he explained all thinking as merely an arrangement according to the principle of the smallest amount of force. I was greatly enraged at the time by this presentation of the thought process. Afterwards he elaborated the theory and wrote his books, and they had a great influence over many people. One who knows his life knows that he was undoubtedly a very excellent citizen, obedient to the city he served throughout his teaching career, and in his teachings a typical example of the thinking that has evolved in recent times.

I might name another similar thinker. Mach himself did not teach in Zurich, but a pupil of his, Adler—the same Adler who shot the Austrian minister Stürgkle. But there was even a much more abstract thinker in Zurich, and his world conception was very similar to the philosophy of Mach—Richard Avenarius. I shall not recommend that you read his books; You would throw them away after the second page. They are written in unintelligible language. And the most unintelligible thing for you would be, how it happens that so very many people have wormed their way into Avenarius's books and have formed a world conception out of his philosophy.

You see, these are extreme cases to show you the difference between a logic of mere abstract thoughts and a logic of fact. Avenarius was also in his life a good middle-class citizen, an excellent citizen of the state in the best sense of the word. But such people as Ernst Mach, his pupil Adler, in whom it was even more apparent, and Avenarius—let us take just Mach and Avenarius—they feel nothing of that logic of fact within which they stand through their on actions. For, look you, what became of the world-conception of this Ernst Mach, solid Bourgeois teacher? What became of it? It became the political philosophy of the Bolshevists; it is the world-conception that lies at the bottom of Bolshevism. Only it went through other human temperaments, through other human soul conditions. That is the actual consequence! The consequence according to fact-logic, of what Ernst Mach and Avenarius taught. It was not just by external chance that some gifted young Russians studied with Avenarius and then with Adler in Zurich; and that then this philosophy happened to be carried over into Russia. No, there is an inner spiritual connection there. It can only be grasped by one who does not think about things, but who thinks in things; he then knows that no system of abstract logical consequences leads from Avenarius and Mach to Lenin and Trotsky, but only a very living logic leads from one to the other. Those are the things upon which so much depends today. They are only comprehensible to one who has sufficient earnestness to study fro the inside how things become, how things metamorphose. We have come to a time when inner life is complicated: when anyone can believe, just as Mach and Avenarius did, that he is a law-abiding man who lives only “on the heights in spiritual serenity”, and does not for a moment suspect that his teachings are capable of becoming political dynamite when they are passed on to other minds.

The great call to men today is to develop in themselves a sense for the deeper connections of life. Without that sense we can go no further. If we want to arrive at fruitful social, ideas then we must not search, as Mach and Avenarius did, for the dead ruins of old self-annihilated world-conceptions. We must turn to the new structure, the world-conception that can only be found in Spiritual Science and that alone understands how to ask: That kind of social order must come, since from now on man, as he passes through the world, will be ever more and more threefolded in his inner nature—for that is how he is crossing the threshold. The external social order must also be threefold. Then outer and inner fact will correspond. This threefolding, if one will really examine it earnestly through Spiritual Science, is not something invented; it is something, that has been learnt from listening to the actual inner metamorphosis of mankind as it moves from the present into the future.

Among all the necessities confronting the man of the present day, is this one: that he develop the willingness to concern himself with the spiritual world; that he develop first of all the willingness so to observe himself—that he is able to see the spiritual man that is underneath. The materialism of natural science has not been worthless. It has been significant and useful even in the form of Haeckelism. That is all a test that must be undergone. It classes man with the animals, because with respect to practically everything that it considers important, man appears to be nothing more than a highly developed animal. However, as soon as we begin to consider man in his relation to the world with respect to self knowledge, then at once the thing is different. Then facts which before were of no importance become important, and vice versa. From a certain perspective a new light streams upon the whole being of man. We know it is a fact (and the exceptions only teach more bout the fact) that the animal walks about the earth with his backbone parallel to the earth's surface. Man makes himself erect in the very first period of his life; he places his body, or his backbone, at right angles with the earth's surface, and thereby forms a cross with the earth's surface and also a cross with the position of the animal's backbone. That fact expresses clearly man's relation to the outside world. It is different from the animal's relation. Of course you can read in Haeckel: Man has just as many bones and muscles as the higher animals. But there are other things to he compared which in an intuitive, or, better, an imaginative grasp of various relations between them, demonstrate the common form of the cosmos and the earth; and this manner of comprehension of the human form is more important than counting bones and muscles, more important than what comparative morphology has to say about man.

I could say a great deal in this connection that would show you,that where the old world conception which has ripened such thought-habits in man as have plunged him into his present misfortune—that where this thinking and these thought-habits end, now a new world conception must begin which, for instance, will comprehend the human form. Then it will give a spiritual view of the world that will fructify the independent spiritual member of the social organism. And at a still higher stage one will have a living knowledge of that existence which is always around us, the “open secret”, as Goethe called it. From there one will rise to an “awakening” such as I have described in my books, Human Riddles and Soul Riddles; one will rise beyond mere comprehension of the relation of the human form to the cosmos to the stage that is actual participation in the great rhythmic swing of the cosmos.

You know that man consists of these three members: nerve-sense system, rhythmic system, and metabolic system. He stands within his nerve-system in such a way as to be able to comprehend the relation of his form to the cosmos. With respect to his feelings—his rhythmics or breathings or breast-system—he stands with this rhythm within the rhythm of the whole world. We can only just touch upon this rhythm now from one angle—we could naturally do much more, but we have mentioned it often in the course of these years from the most varied points of view. I will only repeat what I have often said.

Look at our breathing. Normally, we take 18,breathe a minute. That makes about 25,920 breaths a day. So that in a day we breathe in and out alternately 25,920 times. That is the average number of breaths that a man takes. Now you know that the Old Testament puts the age of a patriarch at 70 years. Naturally one can grow older or die younger, but that is the average age of man. How many days of life is that? An average of 25,920 days. Now if you count that huge breath that we take when we enter in the morning with our ego and astral body into our etheric and physical bodies, so that in the morning we breathe in our spiritual psychic being, and in the evening we breathe it out again—if we count that as a a breath that is drawn every day, then our life-day which consists on the average of 71 years, draws 25,920 breathe. In other words, that great spirit that breathes when we are born and when we die, breathes in his life-day which includes our whole human life, the same number of inhalations and exhalations as we do in our day of 24 hours. So we are related with our human breath to that breathing of the the product of his breath in our waking and sleeping life. And the sun—which you can at least suspect to have some relation to our life—men observe how its rising moves back in the Zodiac a certain number of degrees every year, in such a way that if spring comes at a certain place in a certain constellation one year, the next year it shifts back a few degrees. So the rising of the sun circles around the whole ellipse in what is called a Platonic world-year, which consists of 25,920 years. A life-day for and death consists of 25,920 life-years. A life-day for us consists of 25,920 breaths; our life between birth and death consists of 25, 920 life-days; a great sun-year consists of 25,920 of our life-years. Thus we are brought to what is breathed in the whole sun-earth-process through a Platonic world-year. There you see into a world rhythm of which is a part within the cosmos.

Without at least the willingness to gain an active knowledge of man's relation to the cosmos you can attain no knowledge of man. You can comprehend nothing more through the natural science of today—however strangely this sounds—than man's life up to birth. After man is born something enters into his lie that natural science can no longer comprehend. Therefore natural science has to stay dallying in the method it especially loves, embryology. That is especially apparent today in the fact that the entire teaching of evolution is only an elaboration of embryology. All the rest is phantasy. As soon as man begins to live on earth the necessity immediately arises of contemplating him in imaginative and inspired knowledge. For that is the only means by which one can perceive what man experiences at death, and what death is. At the highest stage of knowledge, true Intuition, which you find described in Knowledge of the Higher Worlds, one attains to that insight into being which is wonderfully indicated in the German language, for one says when a man dies—with a certain fitness—he verwest. (perishes) If today one could still feel something in words, one would truly feel that verwesen means ins Wesen übergehen, ins Wesen hineingehen, mit dem Wesen eine werden. (To go over into being, to go into being, to become one with being) When the language speaks of verwesen it truly is not talking of vergehen (to pass away) [Translator's Note: Although in English one says “pass away”, the German word vergehen which means that, is apparently never used in connection with death; verwesen is the word in common use.] And that mysterious process the deep knowledge of which will create a natural science of the future, the process that is only completed when the human body apparently perishes or is reduced to ashes, is not a destructing; it is a significant constructive part of the event.

Through this kind of consideration I should like to arouse a feeling for the inner connection that lies between what is the dying world-conception and scientific tendency of the old time, and the Spiritual Science that is still in the seed today, really just emerging, in the sense of what it will be in the future. But now the two things are roughly pushed together, and that is the deep tragedy of modern life which we must overcome by inner human power. What I call—one may perhaps be offended by it—the dying bourgeois conception of the world and of life, is at an end; it has brought about its on ruin. What is emerging today as proletarian longing—although still very far from what it will be—has other human foundations. While the bourgeois world-conception is dying in the ether body, what is evolving out of the proletarian world is springing to in the astral body. An extraordinarily significant symbol of the dying world-conception was the egoism of Max Stirner. You will find it described in my book Riddles of Philosophy. We live in an age when we must always try not to judge the thing that is just arising by its outside. However many mistakes it may be making here and there, we must be able to see that the social movement is evolving today among the proletariat out of man's spiritual outlook as the seed of the future. We must be able to see that mankind is passing over a threshold and has to enter into supersense knowledge. And the key that reveals this tendency to one who has supersense—spiritual—knowledge, is precisely the fact that the proletarian world is behaving itself very materialistically indeed, in this or that leader, this or that political boss, fighting against that which it will be someday. It fights against it. It has accepted the bourgeois way of thinking as a final bequest; but it is called in human evolution to cross the threshold consciously, to work its way out of materialistic delusion to real knowledge of the supersensible.

These things that we are considering must be studied by observing their spiritual foundations, so that they do not merely become abstract knowledge but, become an inner impulse for our will. Then we will be able to establish our position within this present social order at the right time and in the right way, with full consciousness.

Dritter Vortrag

Das letztemal, als wir uns hier trafen, konnte ich Ihnen sprechen von inneren Gründen für den Gedanken der Dreigliederung des sozialen Organismus. Ich habe die Betrachtungen so weit führen können, daß wir aufmerksam wurden darauf, in welchem Sinne wir in der Gegenwart in einer gewissen Weise in einer Übergangszeit leben. Sie werden ja diese Bemerkung nicht mißverstehen, da ich oftmals gesagt habe: Wenn ich hier von einer Übergangszeit rede, so soll nicht jene Trivialität gemeint sein, die man oftmals im Auge hat, wenn gesagt wird, man lebe in einer Übergangszeit. Denn schließlich ist jede Zeit, so sagte ich oftmals, eine Übergangszeit, nämlich von der vorhergehenden zu der nachfolgenden. Es kommt darauf an, auf dasjenige gerade das Augenmerk zu richten, was übergeht. Und dafür gibt es allerdings bedeutungsvolle und weniger bedeutungsvolle Augenblicke in der großen weltgeschichtlichen Entwickelung der Menschheit. Und es ist für die Betrachtung des Geisteslebens in jenen Tiefen, in denen es der menschlichen Beobachtung zugänglich ist, klar, daß gerade mit Bezug auf wichtigste, allerwichtigste Impulse der Menschheitsentwickelung in unserer Zeit gewissermaßen unter der Schwelle der äußeren Vorgänge Maßgebendes vorgeht. Ich habe Sie letztes Mal schon darauf aufmerksam gemacht, wie man hineinsehen muß in dasjenige, was man oftmals das Unbewußte oder Unterbewußte der menschlichen Natur, der menschlichen Wesenheit nennt, um zu erkennen, was heute gerade für die Menschheit in einem wesentlichen, in einem wichtigen Sinn in einem Übergang begriffen ist. Nicht das eigentlich sagt uns über die Entwickelung der ganzen Menschheit viel, was wir heute in unserem Bewußtsein haben, obwohl wir im Zeitalter der Bewußtseinsseelenentwickelung gerade leben, obwohl es für den einzelnen Menschen in diesem Zeitalter gerade weltgeschichtlich gesetzmäßig ist, daß er seine Bewußtseinsseele entwickelt. Es ist für die ganze Menschheit, zum Unterschied von einzelnen Menschen, dieses Zeitalter so, daß eben die ganze Menschheit mit Bezug auf die inneren Seelen- und Geisteskräfte durch eine Epoche durchgeht, die die Entwickelung mehr im Unterbewußten sich vollziehen läßt. Im Unterbewußten müssen wir für die ganze Menschheit die wesentlichsten Übergangskräfte finden, wie wir für den einzelnen Menschen heute in diesem Zeitalter die wichtigsten Kräfte finden müssen gerade in der Aneignung des vollen Bewußtseins. Für den einzelnen Menschen geht das instinktive, das mehr naive Erleben der Seele immer mehr und mehr in ein bewußtes Erleben der Seele über; für die ganze Menschheit aber vollzieht sich unbewußt ein Wichtiges, ohne daß der einzelne oftmals auf dieses Wichtige hinschaut, wenn er nicht gerade geisteswissenschaftliche Vertiefung anstrebt.

Und dieses Wichtige, dieses Wesentlichste, es ist gar nicht so leicht zu beschreiben. Denn unsere Sprache ist ja im Grunde genommen gemacht für die seelische Wiedergabe der äußeren sinnlichen Wirklichkeit. Diese Sprache macht es uns schwer, ganz präzise, namentlich hinreichend zu schildern, was nicht der sinnlichen Wirklichkeit angehört, was dem übersinnlichen Dasein angehört. Man muß sich da oftmals helfen durch Vergleiche, aber nicht durch abstrakte Vergleiche, sondern durch solche Vergleiche, wie Sie sie gut aus der Geisteswissenschaft her kennen, die immer eine Lebenserscheinung mit der anderen zusammenstellt, damit die eine Lebenserscheinung die andere erörtere. Wenn dann solche Vergleiche gebildet werden, dann muß man sich klar sein, daß nur ein bewegliches Denken, ein Denken, das die Begriffe, die Worte nicht preßt, auf den genauen Sinn des Darzustellenden wirklich kommt. Ich muß nämlich vergleichen, wenn ich das Wichtigste, was in der gesamten Menschheit in der weltgeschichtlichen Gegenwart vor sich geht, charakterisieren will - ich habe das schon neulich angedeutet -, ich muß vergleichen die heutigen Untergründe der geschichtlichen Vorgänge mit der Erfahrung, welche der einzelne Mensch nur dann bewußt durchmachen kann, wenn er, wie man sagt, die Schwelle in die übersinnliche Welt überschreitet. Sie wissen ja alle aus der Darstellung, die ich über dieses individuelle Erlebnis des Menschen gegeben habe in meinem Buche «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?», daß es ein tief in die Menschenwesenheit eingreifendes Ereignis ist, wenn der Mensch jene Schwelle überschreitet, diesseits welcher für das Bewußtsein des Menschen die sinnliche Welt und jenseits welcher die übersinnliche Welt ist. Es wird ja wahrhaftig alles jenseits dieser Schwelle zur übersinnlichen Welt anders, als hier in der sinnlichen Welt die Dinge liegen. Und der Mensch macht da etwas durch - Sie wissen es ja —, was von denjenigen, die es namentlich im Stile älterer Zeitalter durchgemacht haben, mit dem bedeutungsvollen Worte «das Überschreiten der Pforte des Todes» bezeichnet worden ist. Den Tod in seiner Wesenheit muß eben derjenige kennenlernen, der diese Schwelle wirklich überschreiten will. Den Tod in seiner Bedeutung für das gesamte Leben des Menschen muß er erkennen.

Nun wissen Sie aus der Darstellung, die ich diesem Ereignis der Überschreitung der Schwelle in die übersinnliche Welt in «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?» gegeben habe, daß bei diesem Überschreiten die ganze seelische Wesenheit des Menschen eine Umänderung erfährt, allerdings natürlich nur für diejenigen Zeiten, in denen man da bewußt in der übersinnlichen Welt verweilt. Mit der Seelenverfassung, die man hier in der sinnlichen Welt hat, die für das Leben, für das Wirken, für das Handeln in dieser sinnlichen Welt angemessen ist, mit dieser Seelenverfassung läßt sich gar nicht hineinkommen in die übersinnliche Welt. Hier in der sinnlichen Welt sind die Seelenkräfte Denken, Fühlen und Wollen in einem unzertrennlichen Zusammenhang, so daß wir in unserem Sinnesleben gar nicht dazu kommen, diese Seelenkräfte getrennt zu empfinden, zu erleben. Jemand, der nicht zugleich in der Seele ein gewisses Maß von Wollen, wenn auch in innerem latentem Zustande, entwickeln würde, während er denkt, der wäre seelisch eigentlich nicht gesund. Wir sind gar nicht in unserem sinnlichen Leben imstande, diese drei Seelenkräfte voneinander zu trennen, so daß wir mit der Seele eigentlich niemals ein reines, bloßes Denken entwickeln, nie ein bloßes reines Fühlen, nie ein bloßes reines Wollen. Immer sind in unserem Vorstellen Empfinden, Handeln und Wollen, diese drei Seelenkräfte doch miteinander vermischt, miteinander vermengt. Überschreiten wir die Pforte in die übersinnliche Welt, das heißt, bringen wir unsere Seele dahin, daß wir wirklich, so wie wir sonst hier in der Welt von Sinnesdingen, von Sinnesgeschehnissen umgeben sind, jetzt umgeben sind von übersinnlichen Wesenheiten, von übersinnlichen Taten dieser Wesenheiten, dann muß in unserer Seele eine reinliche Trennung eintreten zwischen Denken, Fühlen und Wollen. Der Mensch muß dann, wie Sie ja aus den Darstellungen in «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?» entnehmen können, so geschult sein, daß er die innere Kraft entwickeln kann, mit seinem Ich diese drei Elemente des Seelenlebens zusammenzuhalten: Denken, Fühlen und Wollen; sonst würde er sich zerspalten in drei Persönlichkeiten.

Ja, das ist das bedeutsame innere Aktivitätserlebnis, das wir haben müssen nach dem Überschreiten der Schwelle: dieses Sich-Hineinfinden in höchste Aktivität des Ich, in höchste Betätigung des Ich, um die getrennten Seelenkräfte, Denken, Fühlen und Wollen, zusammenzuhalten. Das ist auch zunächst die Furcht, die der heutige schwachmütige Mensch hat: die Furcht vor wirklich übersinnlichen Erkenntnissen, diese Furcht vor innerer Seelenbetätigung höchsten Stiles. Der Mensch möchte heute eigentlich alle seine Betätigung so verlaufen lassen, daß sie von der Außenwelt hervorgerufen wird und in der Außenwelt erfolgt. Innere Aktivität liegt dem heutigen Menschen noch nicht, muß sich aber gerade für den heutigen Menschen immer mehr und mehr gegen die Zukunft hin entwickeln. Aber weil diese Entwickelung erst eine Aufgabe ist, nicht eigentlich schon vorhanden ist, deshalb hat der Mensch die Scheu, die Furcht, in die übersinnliche Welt einzutreten. Unbewußt fürchtet er sich -— wenn ich diesen Ausdruck formulieren darf — vor dieser Kraftanstrengung, die drei Seelenfähigkeiten, die sich da trennen, zusammenzuhalten. Ich schildere dieses innere individuelle Erlebnis hier, um Ihnen charakterisieren zu können — sonst würde man es gar nicht charakterisieren können -, was im Inneren des seelischen Erlebens — und Sie wissen, wir dürfen von einem solchen reden -, was im Inneren des seelischen Erlebens der gesamten Menschheit im jetzigen Zeitalter vorgeht. Das, was ich eben geschildert habe als individuelles Erlebnis beim Überschreiten der Schwelle in die übersinnliche Welt, das ist natürlich für den, der diese Schwelle überschreitet, ein vollbewußtes Ereignis, viel bewußter als irgendwelche bewußten Erlebnisse des gewöhnlichen wachen Tagesbewußtseins. Ein gesteigertes Bewußtsein ist es, in dem man die Schwelle überschreitet und in dem man die innere Dreigliederung der menschlichen Seelenwesenheit in der übersinnlichen Welt wahrnimmt.

Etwas Ähnliches, aber jetzt naturgemäß von selbst, nicht bewußt, macht im heutigen Zeitalter als ein kosmisches geschichtliches Ereignis die ganze Menschheit durch. Man merkt es nicht, wenn man nicht den unbewußten Vorgang, der sich für die ganze Menschheit abspielt, geisteswissenschaftlich bewußt studiert. Sie wissen, unser Zeitalter ist das fünfte nach der großen atlantischen Katastrophe, durch die ja erst die gegenwärtige Konfiguration unserer Erdoberfläche entstanden ist. Die fünfte nachatlantische Periode ist es, in der wir leben, und in dieser Periode muß in ihrer Gesamtentwickelung die Menschheit durchgehen durch etwas Ähnliches, wie es die Schwelle ist für den einzelnen individuellen Menschen beim Hineinschreiten in die übersinnliche Welt. Die Menschheit als Ganzes, sagte ich, in ihrer kosmischen, oder wir können auch sagen meinetwillen terrestrischen Geschichtsentwickelung, sie schreitet über die Schwelle, diesseits welcher, das heißt in der vorhergehenden Zeit, eine ganz andere Art von Weltanschauung, von Erkenntnis für die Gesamtmenschheit notwendig war, als jenseits der Schwelle, das heißt nachher.

Das ist es, was im Unbewußten der ganzen Menschheit sich heute abspielt, was man bloßlegen muß durch die Geisteswissenschaft, was aber auch beweist, wie notwendig dieser heutigen Menschheit die Geisteswissenschaft ist. Denn dieses Überschreiten der Schwelle darf eigentlich nicht im Unbewußten bleiben. Dieses Überschreiten der Schwelle muß den Menschen bekannt werden, sonst verschlafen oder mindestens verträumen die Menschen dasjenige, was eigentlich als wichtigstes Ereignis mit ihnen vorgeht. Und wir sollen ja gerade in dieser fünften nachatlantischen Epoche das Bewußtsein ausbilden. Wir können mit Bezug auf das Wichtigste, was mit der Menschheit vorgeht, nicht das Bewußtsein anders ausbilden, als dutch Aufsteigen von der bloßen Sinneswissenschaft zur Geisteswissenschaft.

Wenn Sie dies bedenken, dann wird Ihnen vielleicht ins Gedächtnis kommen, was immer wiederum gesagt worden ist im Laufe der jetzt ja schon seit so langer Zeit auch hier in Stuttgart aus dem Gebiete der Geisteswissenschaft heraus gehaltenen Vorträge. Sehen Sie, immer wiederum mußte ich betonen: Geisteswissenschaft —- so wie sie hier gemeint ist — ist nicht bloß etwas, was gewissermaßen subjektive Erkenntnisbedürfnisse des Einzelnen befriedigen soll. Geisteswissenschaft ist etwas, was mit dem Erfassen, dem denkenden, fühlenden, wollenden Erfassen des Grundimpulses der Menschheit in unserer Zeit zusammenhängt. So daß die Beschäftigung mit Geisteswissenschaft eben nicht sein sollte eine bloße Befriedigung von Neugierde oder Wißbegierde des Einzelnen. Sondern Geisteswissenschaft soll sein die Erfüllung einer gewissen Pflicht, die man hat mit Bezug auf die ganze Menschheit, die erkennen soll in der Gegenwart, was in ihren Tiefen, in den Tiefen ihrer Entwickelung gerade in dieser Epoche vorgeht.

Nun, ich habe Ihnen, als ich neulich vor Ihnen sprechen durfte, ja gesagt, wie einzelne Menschen, die eine gewisse äußere, durch die gegenwärtige wissenschaftliche Schulung ausgebildete Klugheit haben, an bestimmten Erscheinungen merken, was wir heute als Menschheit in einer solchen Epoche erleben, der irgend etwas Unbestimmtes in den menschlichen Tiefen entspricht. Ich habe Ihnen angeführt, wie solche Leute, wie zum Beispiel Frifz Mauthner, davon sprechen, daß der Mensch zunächst seine sinnliche Anschauung haben könne, daß aber eigentlich dies die einzige wahre Wirklichkeit sei, von der der Mensch sprechen könne. Aber diese Wirklichkeit, die er höchstens in der Kunst, im Schönen, im Erhabenen gestaltet, diese Wirklichkeit läßt ihn nicht zur Befriedigung kommen. Er will tiefer in das Wesen der Dinge eindringen. Versucht er dies, versucht er durch sein Inneres in das Wesen der Dinge einzudringen, so kommt er nicht zu einem wirklichen Verbundensein mit der wahren Wesenheit der Welt, so sagt Mauthner, sondern nur zu einem Träumen, wenn auch zu einem solchen Träumen, das sich wohl fühlt, weil es sich verbunden ahnt mit den Zentralkräften der Welt, das aber doch eben nur träumend wissen kann in der Mystik. Diese Mystik ist dann die zweite Stufe menschlichen inneren Seelenstrebens für solche Leute. Allein, sie behaupten, und sie haben von ihrem Gesichtspunkte aus recht, weil sie eine übersinnliche Erkenntnis ablehnen: Mystik ist TraumErkennen. Und als dritte Stufe läßt Fritz Mauthner gelten ein Wissen, das man anstrebt, indem man sich aneignet Naturgesetze, die die Welt beherrschen, historische Gesetze oder sonstige. Allein, das alles bezeichnet er im Grunde genommen als Docta ignorantia aus dem Grunde, weil, indem wir glauben, durch Wissenschaft etwas zu erkennen, wir nicht bloß träumen wie in der Mystik, sondern schlafen, schlafen mit Bezug auf dasjenige, was Verbindung wäre mit den eigentlichen Zentralkräften der Welt. So meinen solche Leute wie Fritz Mauthner: Der Mensch kann höchstens wachend sinnlich wahrnehmen und die sinnlichen Wahrnehmungen durch Kunst veredeln. Der Mensch muß träumen, wenn er versucht, sich religiös oder mystisch durch sein Inneres mit der wahren Wirklichkeit zu verbinden. Und der Mensch muß schlafen, wenn er glaubt, durch Wissenschaft, durch Weisheit irgendwie sich mit den Dingen zu verbinden.

Nun, absolut gesprochen, ist so etwas eine Torheit. Relativ gesprochen, für die besondere Seelenverfassung der Menschheit, die sich entwickelt hat durch das neunzehnte Jahrhundert hindurch und in das zwanzigste Jahrhundert herein, ganz besonders für diese Menschheit gesprochen, nicht im allgemeinen gesprochen, ist es eine Wahrheit. Mit den Mitteln, die die naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisse groß gemacht haben, mit den Mitteln, durch die wir in einen solchen Schiffbruch hineingekommen sind mit Bezug auf die soziale Ordnung der Menschheit, mit diesen Mitteln ist nur seelisch so zu leben, dreistufig, wie Fritz Mauthner es schildert: in der Sinnlichkeit wachend, in der Mystik träumend, in der Wissenschaft schlafend. Den Durchgang durch die Schwelle der gesamten Menschheit findet solch ein Mensch wie Fritz Mauthner. Wer solche Werke gelesen hat, wie «Die Kritik der Sprache» von Fritz Mauthner, in der Mauthner Kant zu überkanten trachtet, wo er nicht nur Begriffe, sondern die Sprache selbst kritisiert, und wer namentlich das «Philosophische Wörterbuch», das dicke, zweibändige von Fritz Mauthner wenigstens in bezug auf den einen oder anderen Artikel gelesen hat — es ist ja alphabetisch angeordnet -, der weiß, in welche Seelenverfassung er gerade durch diese Werke von Fritz Mauthner kommt.

Ich rate Ihnen da ganz besonders - in diesem Falle werden Sie mir vielleicht nur von der einen Seite her für meinen Rat dankbar sein -, ich rate Ihnen, den Artikel «Christentum» zum Beispiel in diesem Wörterbuch der Philosophie zu lesen, oder den Artikel «Res publica», oder den Artikel «Goethes Weisheit», oder den Artikel « Unsterblichkeit». Sie werden überall das Gefühl haben: Jetzt lesen Sie einen Satz. Im zweiten Satz wird das, was man gelesen hat, abgeschwächt. Im dritten wird das Abgeschwächte wieder abgeschwächt. Im vierten das erste zurückgenommen. Im fünften Satz dann das Ganze zurückgenommen mit allen Behauptungen und Abschwächungen. Dann kommen Sie in eine Drehung Ihres ganzen Verstandes- und Gemüts und Seelensystems hinein, und es ist etwas Furchtbares, was man nach solcher Lektüre empfindet. Es ist eine furchtbare innere Seelenqual. Und Sie werden, indem Sie diese innere Seelenqual schildern, die ein Mensch empfindet beim Lesen, der nur die letzte Konsequenz der gegenwärtigen Seelenverfassung zu ziehen den Mut hat - im Gegensatz zu vielen, die eben diesen Mut nicht haben -, Sie werden mit einer Kritik, die-Sie so aussprechen, wie ich sie jetzt ausgesprochen habe, nicht etwa Fritz Mauthner verletzen, indem Sie sie ihm selber entgegenhalten, denn er gesteht zu, er hat selber die gleiche Seelenverfassung, wenn er diesen Artikel niederschreibt. Denn er sagt: Man kann mit menschlicher Erkenntnis überhaupt zu nichts anderem kommen als zu einer Art von Geistestanz, in dem man sich nicht ausfindet. Fritz Mauthner verwechselt die im neunzehnten Jahrhundert und im beginnenden zwanzigsten Jahrhundert notwendig gewordene Haltlosigkeit des Erkennens mit einer vermeintlichen absoluten Haltlosigkeit des Erkennens beim Menschen. Was liegt aber in Wirklichkeit vor? Etwas ganz anderes, als Mauthner glaubt.

In älteren Zeiten hat der Mensch, wie Sie wissen, im atlantischen Hellsehen nicht mystisch geträumt, sondern mystisch erkennend sich mit einer Wirklichkeit verbunden. Er hat auch nicht bloß in Weisheit geschlafen. Wir erkennen noch in den Resten ältester Weisheit, wie bei Plato, wie sie Großes der Menschheit zu sagen wußten. Bei Aristoteles hört es schon auf. Die Menschheit hat nicht nur eine Docta ignorantia gehabt, sondern sie hat eine Weisheit gehabt, durch die sie sich verbunden hat mit den Zentralkräften der Welt, die zugleich die Zentralkräfte des menschlichen Wesens selber sind. Aber diese Fähigkeiten fluteten ab. Sie mußten abfluten, damit der Mensch in sich selber die starken Kräfte suchte, das, was ihm früher von außen durch geistige Wesen ohne sein Zutun gegeben war, durch sein Inneres zu suchen. Heute gehen wir über die Schwelle als ganze Menschheit. Beim Übergang über die Schwelle müssen wir entwickeln die Kräfte aus unserem Innern heraus, die Mystik, die sonst durch unsere Natur in uns schläft, zum Wachen zu bringen, das Träumen der Mystik durch unsere eigene Kraft zu einem Erleben im Geistigen aufzurufen, und ebenso dasjenige, was sonst tote, abstrakte Wissenschaft ist, durch innere Aktivität, durch innere Kraft zum wirklichen Erleben des übersinnlich Geistigen aufzurufen. Heute ist das in unsere Kraft gegeben. Daher müssen wir durch ein solches Studium durchgehen, und daher können Menschen, die nicht zur Geisteswissenschaft kommen wollen, wie Fritz Mauthner, nur dasjenige empfinden, was wie eine notwendige Tragik eben zum Hervorrufen der inneren Kräfte dem Menschen notwendig war. Deshalb müssen Menschen wie Mauthner, die solches empfinden, solches erleben, und nicht zur Geisteswissenschaft kommen wollen, eigentlich verzweifeln an der Möglichkeit, sich für irgend etwas im Leben erkennend zu verbinden mit den Zentralkräften des Daseins, die zu gleicher Zeit die Zentralkräfte der menschlichen Wesenheit selber sind.

Wenn Sie das gründlich überdenken, was ich eben gesagt habe, müssen Sie sich da nicht sagen: Der Mensch ist gegenwärtig durch das unbewußte Überschreiten der Schwelle vor eine starke Prüfung in der Menschheitsentwickelung gestellt? Ja, das ist er. Denn wenn er Aktivität der Seele, starke Betätigung der Seele nicht entwickeln will, so ist er dazu verurteilt, in Untätigkeit, in Inaktivität, und dadurch in Unglauben gegenüber dem Dasein zu verfallen, wenigstens in eine Art von Unsicherheit zu verfallen, wenn es sich darum handelt, mit seinem Innern sich hineinzustellen in das ganze Getriebe der Weltentwickelung. So ist ungefähr die Seelenverfassung eines solchen repräsentativen, typischen Menschen wie Fritz Mauthner. Es gibt viele solche in der Gegenwart, nur ist er innerlich tapfer genug gewesen, das in vielen Schriften zu gestehen, während andere in der gleichen Seelenverfassung sind und es nicht gestehen. Er hat auch die Resignation gehabt, sich zuletzt in einer Südecke Bayerns zurückzuziehen, nachdem er sein Leben lang Journalist gewesen war zum Brotverdienen. Und da hat er die «Kritik der Sprache», sein Buch herber Verzweiflung an menschlichem Erkennen, ausgedacht, hat dann dort sein «Philosophisches Wörterbuch» geschrieben. Er hat sich zurückgezogen, er schreibt noch mancherlei Artikel, die wahrhaftig nicht mehr als seine Bücher geeignet sind, in ein positives, tatkräftiges Sich-Hineinstellen des Menschen in die Gesamtentwickelung hineinzuführen. Es ist bei ihm immer eine Art Zweifel an der Möglichkeit, in das Dasein richtig einzugreifen, weil man ja im Grunde genommen das Dasein nicht erkennend erfassen kann. Mauthner hat die Konsequenz gezogen, sich zurückzuziehen in einen für ihn gleichgültigen Beruf, dem Journalismus sich hingegeben, bei dem man schon Skeptiker, am Leben Zweifelnder, sein kann. Aber es gibt auch Schüler von Fritz Mauthner, die haben diese Resignation nicht gehabt.

Und fragen wir uns jetzt einmal etwas ganz Bestimmtes aus inneren Gründen heraus: Was wird aus diesen Schülern, die mit vollem Herzen sich zu der Lebensauffassung Mauthners bekennen, was wird aus diesen Schülern niemals werden können? Niemals werden sie zu einem lebensvollen Erfassen der Wirklichkeit kommen können. Daher kein solches Erfassen der Wirklichkeit, das fruchtbar in diese Wirklichkeit eingreifen kann. Diese Menschen können nicht ins Leben hineinpassen, wenn sie sich hineinstellen. Fritz Mauthner hat sich ja auch hinausgestellt. Diese Leute erfassen ja nur das sinnliche Leben und glauben an das, was darüber hinausgeht, nur wie an einen Traum, an ein Schlafen.

Solch ein Schüler Mauthners, ehrlich, aufrichtig, aber daher für das soziale Leben der Gegenwart so untauglich wie möglich, ist zum Beispiel Gustav Landauer. Das ist ein wirklicher Schüler von Fritz Mauthner. Es genügt heute nicht, das Leben nur von der Oberfläche aus zu beurteilen. Wir stehen heute vor Aufgaben, die nur zu bewältigen sind, wenn wir den guten Willen haben, in die Untergründe des Lebens unterzutauchen. Wir dürfen heute nicht, wie solche Menschen, wie ich sie eben geschildert habe, aus demjenigen heraus, was die Zeit gebracht hat, Gedankenimpulse suchen für eine neue, soziale Ordnung. Nein, wir müssen aus der aufgehenden Zeit, aus den Impulsen, die eben erst im Aufgang sind, aus den Impulsen der geistigen Erkenntnis heraus, auch die sozialen Impulse suchen; sonst kommen wir nicht zu wirklichen sozialen Impulsen. Dann, wenn sie gefunden sind, können sie, wie alle geisteswissenschaftlichen Ergebnisse, vom gesunden Menschenverstand aufgefaßt werden. In einem solchen Sinn möchte ich auch noch auf unsere Dreigliederung hinweisen.

Heute ist es notwendig, daß in allen Dingen die Menschen lernen, mit tiefster Ehrlichkeit erstens nach wahrhaftiger Selbsterkenntnis, zweitens nach wahrhaftiger Welterkenntnis zu suchen.

Nehmen Sie das, was hier Geisteswissenschaft genannt wird, von den verschiedensten Gesichtspunkten aus durch. Gewiß, auch da wird, wie in mancher abstrakten Mystik und in manchem abstrakten Okkultismus, von Selbsterkenntnis in ihrer Notwendigkeit, von Welterkenntnis in ihrer Notwendigkeit gesprochen, aber anders. So wird gesprochen, wie ich es besonders unserer Zeit ins Herz schreiben möchte: Daß man niemals zur wirklichen Selbsterkenntnis kommen kann, ohne diese Selbsterkenntnis durch Welterkenntnis zu suchen. Hineinbrüten in das Selbst liefert keine Selbsterkenntnis. Welterkenntnis schult erst unser Selbst so, daß dieses Selbst zur Selbsterkenntnis kommen kann. Und wiederum: Niemand kann zu einer Welterkenntnis kommen, ohne daß er den Weg ins eigene Selbst tut. Welterkenntnis ist nicht möglich ohne Selbsterkenntnis. Die beiden Dinge scheinen sich da sogar etwas zu widersprechen, aber dieser Widerspruch ist lebensvoll und fruchtbar: Welterkenntnis nicht ohne Selbsterkenntnis, Selbsterkenntnis nicht ohne Welterkenntnis. Es ist wie das Schlagen eines Pendels, der hin und zurück ausschlagen muß. So muß der Mensch in seinem Leben suchen, stetig suchen den Pendelschlag zwischen Selbsterleben und Welterleben, Welterleben und Selbsterleben. Das aber erst gibt dann Stärkung der Seele, jene innere Aktivität der Seele, die heute und gegen die Zukunft hin der ganzen Menschheit notwendiger und notwendiger werden wird. Deshalb, weil der Mensch aus einem gewissen, im Zeitalter der Bewußtseinsseele natürlichen Egoismus, so sehr leicht in sein Inneres hineinbrütet, deshalb ist die Menschheit verfallen in unserem Zeitalter in die Liebe zur Abstraktion. Sie kann eigentlich gar nicht einmal mehr selber richtig beurteilen, wie stark die Liebe zum bloßen Abstrahieren in unserem Zeitalter ist. Dafür aber auch ist es das Allernotwendigste, daß wir aufsteigen, gerade um die Schwelle, die ich bezeichnet habe, in der richtigen Weise zu überschreiten, daß wir uns bewegen von einer bloßen Abstraktionsnotwendigkeit, einer bloßen Gedankennotwendigkeit, zu einer Tatsache. Von einem bloßen abstrakten Erkennen zu einem Tatsachenerleben. Zu einem Denken in uns nicht im bloßen Gedanken, sondern zu einem Denken, das untertaucht in die Dinge und mit den Dingen und Ereignissen der Welt denkt. Nur dann können wir der Gegenwart gewachsen bleiben. Dafür will ich Ihnen ein Beispiel anführen. Ich bemerke aber von vorneherein, daß Sie nicht das, was ich jetzt sagen werde, so auffassen sollen, wie wenn ich, indem ich die eine oder andere Weltanschauungsrichtung dabei zu charakterisieren habe, auch Stellung nehmen wollte zu dieser einen oder anderen Weltanschauungsrichtung. Ich will nur charakterisieren, nicht richten.

Dasjenige, was man naturwissenschaftliche Weltanschauung, naturwissenschaftlich orientiertes Denken nennt, es hat ja eine Entwickelung genommen, die ich Ihnen von den verschiedensten Gesichtspunkten aus charakterisiert habe. Es ist zuletzt angelangt bei einer solchen Anschauung, wie die von Mauthner ist. Aber auch in anderen Schattierungen hat sie sich ausgedrückt. Ich weiß nicht, ob Sie sich an einen Mann erinnern, von dem ich Ihnen, allerdings in einer anderen Hinsicht und um etwas anderes Ihnen zu charakterisieren, vor Jahren hier einmal gesprochen habe, an jenen Mann, der einmal in einem seiner Bücher, das er «Analyse der Empfindungen» nennt, die Schwierigkeit der Selbsterkenntnis schildern wollte. Er wollte schildern schon die äußere Schwierigkeit der Selbsterkenntnis. Und um diese zu schildern, führte er zwei Beispiele an, wo er in bezug auf Selbsterkennen schon bei seinem Exterieur recht starken Illusionen ausgesetzt war. Einmal, so sagt er, ging er auf der Straße. Plötzlich kommt ihm einer entgegen — der Betreffende war Professor -, er denkt sich: Was für eine Schulmeistergestalt kommt mir denn da entgegen? Sie war ihm ganz unsympathisch, diese Gestalt, so erzählt er selbst. Dann merkte er, was ihm passiert war: er kam vor einen Schaufensterspiegel und kam sich selber in diesem Spiegel entgegen, indem er die Straße entlang ging. Ein andermal stieg er in einen Omnibus ein. Gegenüber der Tür, durch die er einstieg, war ein Spiegel. Er war furchtbar müde. Er sah das Bild und sagte bei sich: Was für ein abgetakelter Kerl steigt denn da zur andern Türe in den Omnibus ein? Erst nach und nach kam er darauf, daß er das selbst war.

Ich habe Ihnen das erzählt, und Sie werden danach schon beurteilen können, daß das immerhin ein ernstzunehmender Mann ist: Ernst Mach, der aus einem Naturforscher Philosoph gewordene Ernst Mach. Nun, er hat wieder verschiedene Schüler. Seine Weltanschauung ist der von Mauthner nicht unähnlich, nur daß Ernst Mach weniger zur Zweifelssucht, zur Haltlosigkeit gekommen ist, sondern einfach an das Spiel der Gedanken glaubt. Das Ich selber ist ihm ein bloßer Mythos, wie auch bei Mauthner, nur ist Mach damit zufrieden. Man muß aber diesen Ernst Mach studieren und dann sein Leben kennenlernen, die ganze Persönlichkeit kennenlernen. Ich erinnere mich selbst, wie ich zuerst Ernst Mach gesehen habe in der Wiener Akademie der Wissenschaften, wo er einen Festvortrag hielt über die Ökonomie des Denkens, wo er alles das, was man denkt, bloß wie eine Anordnung der Gedanken nach dem Prinzip des kleinsten Kraftmaßes erklärte. Ich hatte damals eine große Wut auf diese Darstellung des Denkprozesses. Dann hat er das ausgebaut, hat seine Bücher geschrieben, welche auf viele Leute einen großen Einfluß gewonnen haben. Kennt man sonst sein Leben, dann weiß man: Er war ganz gewiß ein sehr, sehr braver, dem Staate, dem er durch sein Lehrfach diente, sehr gehorsamer Staatsbürger, mit Bezug auf sein Gelehrtentum ein typischer Vertreter des sich in der neueren Zeit heraufentwikkelnden Denkens. Ich könnte Ihnen noch einen ähnlichen Denker nennen. Mach hat selber nicht in Zürich gelehrt, sondern nur ein Schüler von ihm: Friedrich Adler, derselbe Adler, der dann den österreichischen Minister Stürgkh erschossen hat. Aber ein zwar viel abstrakter noch denkender Mann hat in Zürich eine der Machschen Philosophie, der Machschen Weltanschauung sehr ähnliche Weltanschauung vertreten: Richard Avenarius. Ich kann Ihnen nicht raten, die Bücher von Avenarius zu lesen; Sie würden sie nach der zweiten Seite wegwerfen. Sie sind in einer unverständlichen Sprache geschrieben. Es würde für Sie nur das eine Unerklärliche vorliegen: wie es denn kommt, daß sich doch sehr, sehr viele Menschen in die Bücher von Avenarius vertieft haben und sich aus seiner Philosophie heraus heute eine Weltanschauung gebildet haben.

Was ich Ihnen hier bespreche, sind extreme Fälle, die Sie aufmerksam machen können auf den Unterschied einer bloß abstrakten Gedankenlogik und einer Tatsachenlogik. Avenatius war auch seinem Leben nach wahrhaftig ein guter Durchschnittsbürger, ein braver Staatsbürger in bestem Sinne des Wortes. Aber solche Leute wie Ernst Mach, sein Schüler Adler, bei dem es schon mehr sichtbar wurde, und Avenarius — nehmen wir zunächst einmal Mach und Avenarius -, die fühlen nichts von der Tatsachenlogik, in der sie durch ihre eigenen Tatsachen stehen. Denn, sehen Sie, was ist denn geworden aus der Weltanschauung von Ernst Mach und Avenarius, diesen braven, gehorsamen, waschechten Bourgeois-Gelehrten? Was ist daraus geworden? Es ist daraus geworden die Staatsphilosophie der Bolschewisten, die Weltanschauung, die dem Bolschewismus zugrunde liegt. Es ist nur durch andere menschliche Temperamente gegangen, durch andere menschliche Seelenverfassungen gegangen. Tatsachenkonsequenz! Konsequenz nach der Tatsachenlogik desjenigen, was Ernst Mach und Avenarius gelehrt haben.

Das ist nicht nur durch einen äußeren Zufall geschehen, daß gerade durch das Studieren von begabten russischen Studenten bei Avenarius und dann bei Adler in Zürich etwa zufällig hinübergetragen worden ist nach Rußland diese Philosophie, sondern da liegt ein innerer geistiger Zusammenhang vor. Den begreift nur derjenige, der nicht mit Gedanken über die Dinge denkt, sondern der in den Dingen denken kann, der weiß, daß zwar nicht eine abstrakt logische Konsequenzmacherei von Avenarius und Mach zu Lenin und Trotzki führt, daß aber eine sehr tatsächliche Logik führt von dem einen zum anderen. Das sind die Dinge, auf die es heute ankommt. Sie sind heute nur zugänglich dem, der den Ernst dazu hat, das Innere des Werdens zu studieren. Denn wir sind in einer komplizierten Zeit des inneren Lebens angekommen, wo so jemand wie Mach und Avenarius glauben kann, daß er ein Mann der Ordnung ist, daß er ein Mann ist, der nur in geistigen Ordnungshöhen lebt, und nicht ahnt, daß es zu politischem Dynamit werden kann, was er lehrt, wenn seine Gedanken übergehen von ihm in andere Seelen.

Es ergeht heute an die Menschheit der große Ruf, sich einen Sinn anzueignen für die tieferen Zusammenhänge des Lebens. Ohne diesen Sinn kommt man nicht weiter. Wollen wir zu fruchtbaren sozialen Ideen kommen, dann dürfen wir auch nicht wie Richard Avenarius und Ernst Mach die toten Endprodukte der alten, in sich selber sich vernichtenden Weltanschauungen aussuchen, sondern wir müssen uns zuwenden jenem Neuaufbau der Weltanschauungen, der nur in der Geisteswissenschaft gegeben werden kann und der allein in der richtigen Weise zu fragen versteht: Was muß als soziale Ordnung auftreten, wenn der Mensch in der Zukunft, von der Gegenwart an und in der Zukunft immer mehr und mehr so innerlich dreigeteilt — denn er geht über die Schwelle innerlich dreigeteilt - durch die Welt schreitet? Da muß ihm die äußere soziale Ordnung das Spiegelbild sein; da muß die äußere soziale Ordnung dreigeteilt sein. Dann wird Äußeres und Inneres sich in der Zukunft entsprechen. Diese Dreigliederung ist, wenn man sie wirklich mit ernster geistiger Wissenschaft zu betrachten vermag, nicht etwas Ersonnenes; sie ist etwas einfach dem wahren inneren Werdegang der Menschheit, wie er vorschreitet von der Gegenwart zu der Zukunft, Abgelauschtes.

Zu allen anderen Erfordernissen, die an den Menschen der Gegenwart sich richten, gehört eben auch dieses, daß der Mensch den guten Willen entwickelt, sich auf die Betrachtung der geistigen Welt einzulassen. Daß er zunächst einmal den guten Willen entwickelt, sich selber so zu betrachten, daß der Betrachtung anschaulich wird, was geistig diesem Menschen zugrunde liegt. Eine Prüfung, nicht etwas Endgültiges, war der naturwissenschaftliche Materialismus. Deshalb ist er auch so bedeutungsvoll und nützlich, selbst in der Gestalt des Haeckelianismus. Eine Prüfung, durch die durchgegangen werden muß, ist das alles. Da wird der Mensch an die Tierreihe angereiht, weil im Grunde genommen mit Bezug auf alles dasjenige, worauf diese Betrachtung Wert legt, der Mensch doch nur als höherentwickeltes Tier erscheint. Beginnen wir aber, den Menschen mit Bezug auf die Selbsterkenntnis im Zusammenhang mit der Welt zu betrachten, so wird die Sache gleich anders. Da werden Dinge, die sonst als unwichtig gelten, zu wichtigen, und umgekehrt. Da strahlt einfach dadurch, daß man auf einem besonderen Betrachtungs-Standpunkt steht, ein neues Licht auf die ganze Wesenheit des Menschen. Im wesentlichen, wir wissen es, geht das Tier so über die Erde hin, daß es - die Ausnahmen lehren gerade sehr viel für das Wesentliche - sein Rückgrat parallel der Erdoberfläche trägt. Der Mensch richtet sich in der ersten Zeit seines Lebens auf, stellt die Hauptrichtung seines Leibes, das heißt die Richtung seines Rückgrates, senkrecht auf die Erdoberfläche, bildet mit dieser Erdoberfläche im Rückgrat ein Kreuz, bildet auch mit der Richtung des tierischen Rückgrates ein Kreuz. Indem man das ausspricht, spricht man klar aus das Verhältnis des Menschen zur übrigen Welt. Es ist anders beim Tier, es ist anders beim Menschen. Da können Sie immer lesen bei Aaeckel: Der Mensch hat gerade so viele Knochen und Muskeln wie die höheren Tiere. — Aber es gibt noch andere Dinge, die nicht gezählt werden können, die in einem intuitiven, oder besser gesagt imaginativen Erfassen der Gestalt in ihrem Verhältnis zur Gesamtgestaltung des Kosmos und der Erde bestehen, und dieses Erfassen der Gestalt, nicht ein Sprechen über das Wesen des Menschen, das ist wichtiger als das Zählen der Knochen und der Muskeln, wichtiger als das, was die vergleichende Morphologie über den Menschen zu sagen hat.

Von da ausgehend könnte ich Ihnen nun vieles sagen, was Ihnen zeigen würde, daß da, wo aufhören muß die bisherige Weltenbetrachtung, die im Menschen solche Denkgewohnheiten gezeitigt hat, welche den Menschen ins gegenwärtige Unglück hineingeführt haben, daß da, wo dieses Denken und diese Denkgewohnheiten endigen, nunmehr ein Neues beginnen muß, welches zum Beispiel sich anschließt an die Gestalt. Das wird dann eine geistige Betrachtung der Welt geben, das wird befruchten den selbständigen, sozialen Geistesorganismus.

Und eine noch höhere Stufe - diese Stufen werden nicht wie sonst bei unseren Zeitgenossen nur träumend-mystisch aufwachen -, eine noch höhere Stufe wird lebendig erfassen dasjenige Sein, das immer um uns ist, das «offenbare Geheimnis», wie Goethe sagt. Von da wird dann aufgestiegen werden in solchem «Erwachtsein», wie ich es in meinem Buche «Vom Menschenrätsel» und «Von Seelenrätseln» genannt habe, zu dem, was nun nicht nur ein Hineinstellen der Gestalt in den Kosmos ist, sondern was ein Mitschwingen ist mit den großen rhythmischen Schwingungen des Kosmos.

Sie wissen, der Mensch besteht aus diesen drei Gliedern: NervenSinnessystem, rhythmisches System, Stoffwechselsystem. Im NervenSinnessystem steht er so drinnen, daß er dadurch die Gestalt im Verhältnis zum Kosmos erfassen kann. In bezug auf sein Fühlen, das Rhythmus-, das Atmungs- oder Brustsystem, da steht er drinnen mit diesem Rhythmus in dem Rhythmus der ganzen Welt. Diesen Rhythmus können wir ja zunächst — wir könnten natürlich viel mehr haben, weil wir von den verschiedensten Gesichtspunkten aus im Lauf der Jahre vieles erwähnt haben -, diesen Rhythmus können wir zunächst nur an einem Zipfel erfassen. Ich will nur wiederholen schon öfter Gesagtes. Wir sehen hin auf unsere Atmung. Wir haben beim normalen Atmen 18 Atemzüge in der Minute. Das gibt in einem Tag bei 24 Stunden ungefähr 25 920 Atemzüge. So daß wir in einem Tage rhythmisch hintereinander vollziehen das Einatmen und das Ausatmen: ungefähr 25 920 mal. Das ist das kleinste Atmen, das unser individueller Mensch entfaltet. Sie wissen, schon im Alten Testament hat man das Patriarchenalter auf 70 Jahre ungefähr angenommen. Man kann natürlich älter werden, man kann auch jünger sterben, aber das ist so etwa das Durchschnittsalter der Menschen, 70 bis 72 Jahre. Wieviel Lebenstage sind dies? Sehr approximativ gerechnet 25 920 Lebenstage. Wenn Sie nun nehmen jenen großen Atemzug, der mit uns gemacht wird, indem wir am Morgen untertauchen mit unserem Ich und Astralleib in unsern Ätherleib und physischen Leib, so daß wir morgens einatmen unser Geistig-Seelisches und abends wieder ausatmen, wenn Sie das nehmen als einen Atemzug, der jeden Tag vollzogen wird, dann vollzieht unser Lebenstag, der ungefähr 71 Jahre umfaßt, 25 920 Atemzüge. Das heißt, jener große Geist, der da atmet, indem wir geboren werden und sterben, der atmet in seinem Lebenstag, der unser ganzes Menschenleben umfaßt, so oft ein und aus wie wir in 24 Stunden. So sind wir angepaßt mit unserem menschlichen Atmen jenem geistigen Atmen, das der Geist vollzieht, für den das Ein- und Ausatmen ist, was für uns Geborenwerden und Sterben ist. Wir sind das Ergebnis seiner Atemzüge in unserem Wach- und Schlafesleben. Und die Sonne, von der Sie ja wenigstens ahnen können, daß sie eine Beziehung zu unserem Erleben hat: der Mensch beobachtet, wie ihr Aufgang vorrückt im Tierkreisbild um eine bestimmte Anzahl Grade jährlich, so daß, wenn der Frühlingspunkt liegt an einer bestimmten Stelle eines bestimmten Tierkreisbildes, er das nächste Jahr weiter verschoben ist und so weiter. So kreist der Aufgangspunkt der Sonne scheinbar um die ganze Ekliptik herum, in dem, was ein platonisches Weltenjahr genannt wird, und das umfaßt 25 920 Jahre. Ein Lebenstag von uns enthält 25 920 Atemzüge, unser Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod enthält 25 920 Lebenstage, ein großes Sonnenjahr 25 920 unserer Lebensjahre. So fügen wir uns hinein in dasjenige, was geatmet wird im Sonnen-Erden-Prozeß durch ein platonisches Weltenjahr hindurch. Da sehen Sie hinein in einen Weltenrhythmus, durch den der Mensch hineingegliedert wird in den Kosmos.

Ohne wenigstens den guten Willen zu haben, den Menschen in beweglicher Erkenntnis im Zusammenhang zu erkennen mit dem Kosmos, können Sie keine Erkenntnis des Menschen gewinnen. Sie können nichts mehr begreifen mit der heutigen Naturwissenschaft, so sonderbar das klingt, als des Menschen Leben bis zur Geburt. Nachdem der Mensch geboren worden ist, tritt etwas mit seinem Leben ein, das die Naturwissenschaft nicht mehr erfassen kann. Daher muß die Naturwissenschaft bei der Methode, welche besonders beliebt ist, bei der Embryologie stehenbleiben. Das zeigt sich heute besonders darin, daß die ganze Entwickelungslehre heute nur ein Ausbilden ist der Embryologie. Das andere ist alles Phantasie. Beginnt der Mensch auf der Erde zu leben, so tritt die Notwendigkeit ein, in imaginativer, in inspirierter Erkenntnis ihn zu durchschauen. Denn nur mit dieser kann man durchschauen, was der Mensch beim Tode erlebt, und was der Tod ist. Durch die höchste Stufe der Erkenntnis, die Sie beschrieben finden in «Wie erlangt man Erkenntnisse der höheren Welten?» als die Stufe der wahrhaften Intuition, erlangt man jene Einsicht in das Wesen, das wunderbar in der Sprache selbst angedeutet wird, indem man vom Leichnam, und zwar mit einem gewissen Recht, sagt: er verwest. Wenn man heute so etwas noch fühlen könnte bei den Worten, so würde man wahrhaftig fühlen: Verwesen heißt ins Wesen übergehen, ins Wesen hineingehen, mit dem Wesen eins werden. Indem die Sprache von Verwesen redet, redet sie wahrhaftig nicht von Vergehen. Und der geheimnisvolle Prozeß, den eine künftige Naturwissenschaft aus den Tiefen des Erkennens herausholen wird, der erst dann sich vollzieht, wenn der menschliche Leib scheinbar verwest oder verbrennt, der ist nicht ein Vernichten; der ist gerade etwas Bedeutungsvolles im inneren Aufbau des Geschehens.

Ich möchte durch eine solche Betrachtung wie die heutige ein Gefühl davon hervorrufen, wie ein innerer Zusammenhang ist zwischen dem, was ersterbende Weltanschauung und wissenschaftliche Richtung der alten Zeit ist, und der noch im Keime befindlichen, heute eigentlich erst auftauchenden Geisteswissenschaft im Sinne dessen, was werden muß gegen die Zukunft hin. Es stoßen aber hart die beiden Dinge aneinander. Und hier beginnt anschaulich zu werden eine tiefe Tragik des modernen Lebens, die wir durch innere Menschenkraft besiegen müssen. Dasjenige, was ich, mag man mir es noch so übel nehmen, die untergehende bürgerliche Welt- und Lebensauffassung nenne, das ist ein letztes Ende, das bereitet sich selber den Untergang. Dasjenige, was heute noch wahrhaftig sehr weit von dem entfernt ist, was es werden soll, was als proletarische Sehnsucht herauftaucht, das hat andere menschliche Untergründe. Während die bürgerliche Weltanschauung untergeht im Ätherleib, geht aus dem Astralleib auf dasjenige, was sich aus der proletarischen Welt entwickelt. Und ein furchtbar deutlich sprechendes Symbolum der untergehenden Weltanschauung war die Egoistik Max Stirners. Sie finden sie in ihrem Zusammenhange geschildert in meinem Buche «Die Rätsel der Philosophie». Jetzt leben wir in einem Zeitalter, wo wir durchaus versuchen müssen, dasjenige, was aufgeht, nicht nach seiner Außenseite zu beurteilen. Mag es heute da oder dort noch so viel irren, wir müssen dasjenige, was sich heute als soziale Bewegung aus dem Proletariat heraus entwickelt, als das Werden des Zukünftigen anschauen können, gerade vom geistigen Gesichtspunkte des Menschen aus. Wir müssen sehen können: Die Menschheit überschreitet eine Schwelle, sie muß hinein in das übersinnliche Erkennen. Und gerade das ist für den geistig Erkennenden ein scharf sprechendes Mittel, die Richtung zu schauen, daß sich gerade die proletarische Welt in diesen oder jenen Führern, in diesen oder jenen Bonzen, recht sehr materialistisch benimmt und sich wehrt gegen das, was sie einst sein wird. Sie wehrt sich. Sie hat angenommen als letztes Erbstück die bürgerliche Denkungsweise, aber sie ist in der menschlichen Entwickelung dazu berufen, bewußt über die Schwelle zu schreiten, sich herauszuarbeiten aus materialistischem Irrwahn zur wirklichen Erkenntnis des Übersinnlichen. Gerade dasjenige, worauf hier hingewiesen wird, es muß durch Beobachtung eines geistigen Untergrundes so erforscht werden, daß es nicht bloß zu abstraktem Erkennen wird, sondern daß es unserem Willen innerlich Impuls werden kann. Dann werden wir uns zur rechten Zeit in der rechten Weise in diese gegenwärtige soziale Ordnung mit vollem Bewußtsein hineinstellen können.

Third Lecture

The last time we met here, I was able to speak to you about the inner reasons for the idea of the threefold social organism. I was able to take these considerations so far that we became aware of the sense in which we are currently living in a kind of transition period. You will not misunderstand this remark, as I have often said: When I speak here of a transitional period, I do not mean the triviality that is often meant when people say that we are living in a transitional period. For, as I have often said, every period is a transitional period, namely from the previous period to the next. What is important is to focus our attention on what is passing over. And for this there are indeed moments of greater and lesser significance in the great world-historical development of humanity. And it is clear to anyone who observes spiritual life in those depths where it is accessible to human observation that, precisely in relation to the most important, the most crucial impulses of human development in our time, something decisive is taking place beneath the threshold of external events. Last time, I already drew your attention to how we must look into what is often called the unconscious or subconscious of human nature, of the human being, in order to recognize what is currently undergoing a transition for humanity in an essential, important sense. What we have in our consciousness today does not actually tell us much about the development of humanity as a whole, even though we are living in the age of consciousness soul evolution, even though it is a law of world history that the individual human being in this age develops his consciousness soul. Unlike individual human beings, this age is such for the whole of humanity that the whole of humanity, in relation to its inner soul and spirit forces, is passing through an epoch in which development is taking place more in the subconscious. In the subconscious, we must find the most essential transitional forces for the whole of humanity, just as we must find the most important forces for the individual human being today in this age precisely in the acquisition of full consciousness. For the individual human being, the instinctive, more naive experience of the soul is increasingly giving way to a conscious experience of the soul; but for the whole of humanity, something important is taking place unconsciously, without the individual often noticing this importance, unless he or she is striving for spiritual scientific insight.

And this important thing, this most essential thing, is not at all easy to describe. For our language is basically designed for the soul-based reproduction of external sensory reality. This language makes it difficult for us to describe precisely, and indeed adequately, what does not belong to sensory reality, what belongs to supersensible existence. We often have to resort to comparisons, but not abstract comparisons, rather comparisons such as you are familiar with from spiritual science, which always juxtaposes one phenomenon of life with another so that one phenomenon can explain the other. When such comparisons are made, it must be clear that only a flexible mind, a mind that does not constrain concepts and words, can truly grasp the precise meaning of what is to be represented. For I must compare, if I want to characterize the most important thing that is happening in the whole of humanity in the present world history—I have already indicated this recently—I must compare the present-day background of historical events with the experience that the individual human being can only consciously go through when he crosses, as they say, the threshold into the supersensible world. You all know from the description I gave of this individual experience of human beings in my book How Does One Reach Knowledge of Higher Worlds? that it is an event that deeply affects human nature when a person crosses that threshold, on this side of which is the sensory world for human consciousness and on the other side of which is the supersensible world. Everything beyond this threshold into the supersensible world is truly different from the way things are here in the sensory world. And human beings go through something there—as you know—which those who have experienced it, especially in earlier times, have described with the meaningful words “passing through the gate of death.” Those who truly want to cross this threshold must learn about death in its essence. They must recognize death in its significance for the entire life of the human being.

Now you know from the description I gave in “How to Know Higher Worlds” of this event of crossing the threshold into the supersensible world that when this threshold is crossed, the entire soul being of the human being undergoes a transformation, though of course only for those periods of time in which one consciously dwells in the supersensible world. With the soul state that one has here in the sensory world, which is appropriate for life, for working, for acting in this sensory world, it is impossible to enter the supersensible world. Here in the sensory world, the soul forces of thinking, feeling, and willing are inseparably connected, so that in our sensory life we are unable to perceive or experience these soul forces separately. Someone who does not develop a certain degree of willing in their soul, even if only in an inner latent state, while they are thinking, would not actually be mentally healthy. In our sensory life, we are not capable of separating these three soul forces from one another, so that we never actually develop pure, mere thinking with our soul, never mere pure feeling, never mere pure willing. In our imagining, feeling, acting, and willing, these three soul forces are always mixed together, blended together. When we pass through the gate into the supersensible world, that is, when we bring our soul to the point where we are truly surrounded by supersensible beings and the supersensible actions of these beings, just as we are otherwise surrounded here in the world by sense things and sense events, then a clear separation must occur in our soul between thinking, feeling, and willing. As you can see from the descriptions in How to Know Higher Worlds, human beings must then be trained to develop the inner strength to hold these three elements of soul life together with their I: thinking, feeling, and willing; otherwise they would split into three personalities.

Yes, that is the significant inner experience of activity that we must have after crossing the threshold: finding ourselves in the highest activity of the ego, in the highest exercise of the ego, in order to hold together the separate soul forces of thinking, feeling, and willing. This is also the initial fear that weak-minded people have today: the fear of truly supersensible knowledge, this fear of inner soul activity of the highest order. Today, people actually want all their activities to be caused by the external world and to take place in the external world. Inner activity is not yet natural to modern human beings, but it must develop more and more toward the future, especially for modern human beings. But because this development is only a task, not something that already exists, people are afraid to enter the supersensible world. Unconsciously, they fear — if I may use this expression — the effort required to hold together the three soul faculties that separate there. I am describing this inner individual experience here in order to characterize — otherwise it would be impossible to characterize — what is going on within the soul experience — and you know that we can speak of such a thing — what is going on within the soul experience of the whole of humanity in the present age. What I have just described as an individual experience when crossing the threshold into the supersensible world is, of course, a fully conscious event for those who cross this threshold, much more conscious than any conscious experiences of ordinary waking consciousness. It is an heightened state of consciousness in which one crosses the threshold and perceives the inner threefold structure of the human soul in the supersensible world.

Something similar, but now naturally occurring of its own accord, not consciously, is happening to the whole of humanity in the present age as a cosmic historical event. One does not notice it unless one studies the unconscious process taking place for the whole of humanity with spiritual scientific awareness. You know that our age is the fifth after the great Atlantean catastrophe, which created the present configuration of the Earth's surface. We are living in the fifth post-Atlantean period, and in this period, humanity must pass through something similar to the threshold that the individual human being encounters when entering the supersensible world. Humanity as a whole, I said, in its cosmic, or we might also say terrestrial, historical development, is crossing the threshold beyond which, that is, in the previous period, a completely different kind of worldview, of knowledge, was necessary for the whole of humanity than beyond the threshold, that is, afterwards.

This is what is happening today in the unconscious of the whole of humanity, what must be revealed through spiritual science, but which also proves how necessary spiritual science is for humanity today. For this crossing of the threshold must not remain in the unconscious. This crossing of the threshold must become known to human beings, otherwise they will sleep through or at least dream away what is actually happening to them as the most important event. And it is precisely in this fifth post-Atlantean epoch that we are to develop consciousness. With regard to the most important thing happening to humanity, we cannot develop consciousness in any other way than by rising from mere sensory science to spiritual science.

If you consider this, you may recall what has been said time and again in the lectures given here in Stuttgart for such a long time now in the field of spiritual science. You see, I have always had to emphasize that spiritual science — as it is meant here — is not merely something that is supposed to satisfy the subjective need for knowledge of the individual. Spiritual science is something that is connected with the comprehension, the thinking, feeling, and willing comprehension of the fundamental impulse of humanity in our time. Thus, the study of spiritual science should not be merely a satisfaction of the curiosity or thirst for knowledge of the individual. Rather, spiritual science should be the fulfillment of a certain duty that one has toward the whole of humanity, which must recognize in the present what is happening in its depths, in the depths of its development, especially in this epoch.

Now, when I had the opportunity to speak to you recently, I told you how individual people who have a certain outer intelligence, trained by present-day scientific education, perceive in certain phenomena what we are experiencing today as humanity in such an epoch, which corresponds to something indefinable in the depths of the human being. I have shown you how such people, such as Fritz Mauthner, for example, speak of the fact that human beings can initially have their sensory perception, but that this is actually the only true reality of which human beings can speak. But this reality, which he can at best shape in art, in beauty, in the sublime, does not satisfy him. He wants to penetrate deeper into the essence of things. If he tries to do this, if he tries to penetrate into the essence of things through his inner being, he does not achieve a real connection with the true essence of the world, says Mauthner, but only a dream, albeit a dream that feels good because it senses a connection with the central forces of the world, but which can only be known through dreaming in mysticism. This mysticism is then the second stage of human inner soul striving for such people. However, they claim, and they are right from their point of view because they reject supernatural knowledge, that mysticism is dream recognition. And as the third stage, Fritz Mauthner accepts a knowledge that is sought by acquiring the natural laws that govern the world, historical laws, or other laws. However, he basically refers to all this as docta ignorantia for the reason that, in believing that we recognize something through science, we are not merely dreaming as in mysticism, but sleeping, sleeping with regard to that which would be connected with the actual central forces of the world. People like Fritz Mauthner believe that humans can at most perceive things sensually while awake and refine their sensory perceptions through art. Humans must dream when they try to connect with true reality through their inner selves in a religious or mystical way. And humans must sleep when they believe that they can somehow connect with things through science or wisdom.

Well, in absolute terms, such a thing is foolishness. Relatively speaking, however, for the particular state of mind of humanity that has developed throughout the nineteenth century and into the twentieth century, especially for this humanity, not in general, it is a truth. With the means that have made scientific knowledge great, with the means by which we have come to such a shipwreck with regard to the social order of humanity, with these means it is only possible to live spiritually in three stages, as Fritz Mauthner describes it: awake in sensuality, dreaming in mysticism, sleeping in science. A person like Fritz Mauthner finds his way through the threshold of all humanity. Anyone who has read works such as Fritz Mauthner's Die Kritik der Sprache (The Critique of Language), in which Mauthner attempts to outdo Kant by criticizing not only concepts but language itself, and anyone who has read at least one or two articles in Fritz Mauthner's thick, two-volume Philosophisches Wörterbuch (Philosophical Dictionary) — which is, after all arranged alphabetically — knows what state of mind he is in when he reads these works by Fritz Mauthner. the thick, two-volume work by Fritz Mauthner, at least in relation to one or two articles—it is arranged alphabetically, after all—knows what state of mind Fritz Mauthner's works put them in.

I advise you in particular—in this case, you may only be grateful to me for my advice from one point of view—I advise you to read the article “Christianity,” for example, in this dictionary of philosophy, or the article “Res publica,” or the article “Goethe's Wisdom,” or the article “Immortality.” You will have the feeling everywhere: Now you are reading a sentence. In the second sentence, what you have read is toned down. In the third, what has been toned down is toned down again. In the fourth, the first is retracted. In the fifth sentence, the whole thing is retracted, with all the assertions and toning down. Then you find yourself in a whirlwind of your entire mind, emotions, and soul, and it is a terrible feeling that one experiences after such reading. It is a terrible inner torment. And by describing this inner torment that a person feels when reading, who has the courage to draw the ultimate conclusion from their current state of mind – in contrast to many who do not have this courage – you will not hurt Fritz Mauthner by expressing it as I have just done, because he admits that he himself is in the same state of mind when he writes this article. For he says: One can only hurt someone who is in the same state of mind as oneself. by holding it up to him, because he admits that he himself is in the same state of mind when he writes this article. For he says: With human knowledge, one can come to nothing else than a kind of mental dance in which one cannot find one's bearings. Fritz Mauthner confuses the instability of knowledge that became necessary in the nineteenth century and at the beginning of the twentieth century with a supposed absolute instability of human knowledge. But what is really going on here? Something completely different from what Mauthner believes.

In ancient times, as you know, humans did not dream mystically in Atlantic clairvoyance, but connected themselves with reality through mystical cognition. Nor did they merely sleep in wisdom. We can still see in the remnants of ancient wisdom, as in Plato, how they knew how to say great things about humanity. With Aristotle, it already comes to an end. Humanity did not merely have a docta ignorantia, but it had a wisdom through which it connected itself with the central forces of the world, which are at the same time the central forces of the human being itself. But these abilities ebbed away. They had to ebb away so that human beings could seek within themselves the strong forces that had previously been given to them from outside by spiritual beings without their involvement. Today, we are crossing the threshold as the whole of humanity. In crossing the threshold, we must develop the forces from within ourselves, bring to life the mysticism that otherwise lies dormant in our nature, and through our own power awaken the dreams of mysticism to a spiritual experience. Likewise, we must awaken what is otherwise dead, abstract science to a real experience of the supersensible spiritual realm through inner activity and inner strength. Today, this is within our power. That is why we must go through such a course of study, and why people who do not want to come to spiritual science, such as Fritz Mauthner, can only perceive what was necessary as a tragic necessity in order to awaken the inner forces in human beings. That is why people like Mauthner, who feel this way and do not want to come to spiritual science, actually despair of the possibility of connecting themselves cognitively with the central forces of existence, which are at the same time the central forces of human nature itself.

If you think carefully about what I have just said, do you not have to say to yourself: Is man currently facing a severe test in human evolution due to his unconscious crossing of the threshold? Yes, he is. For if he does not want to develop soul activity, strong soul activity, he is doomed to fall into inactivity, into inaction, and thereby into disbelief in existence, or at least into a kind of uncertainty when it comes to placing himself with his inner being in the whole machinery of world evolution. Such is approximately the state of mind of a representative, typical person like Fritz Mauthner. There are many such people in the present day, only he was inwardly brave enough to admit it in many writings, while others are in the same state of mind and do not admit it. He also had the resignation to retire to a corner of southern Bavaria after spending his whole life as a journalist to earn a living. And there he conceived his “Critique of Language,” his book of bitter despair about human knowledge, and then wrote his “Philosophical Dictionary.” He has withdrawn, he still writes various articles that are truly no more suitable than his books for leading people into a positive, energetic involvement in the overall development of humanity. He always has a kind of doubt about the possibility of intervening correctly in existence, because, after all, one cannot comprehend existence in its entirety. Mauthner drew the conclusion that he should withdraw into a profession that was indifferent to him, devoting himself to journalism, where one can be a skeptic, a doubter of life. But there are also students of Fritz Mauthner who did not share this resignation.

And now let us ask ourselves something very specific, based on inner reasons: What will become of these students who wholeheartedly profess Mauthner's view of life, what will never become of these students? They will never be able to grasp reality in a meaningful way. Therefore, they will never be able to grasp reality in a way that can fruitfully intervene in this reality. These people cannot fit into life if they try to fit into it. Fritz Mauthner also removed himself from it. These people only grasp sensual life and believe in what lies beyond it only as if it were a dream, as if they were asleep.

One such student of Mauthner, honest and sincere, but therefore as unsuited to contemporary social life as it is possible to be, is Gustav Landauer. He is a true student of Fritz Mauthner. Today, it is not enough to judge life solely from the surface. We are faced today with tasks that can only be accomplished if we have the good will to delve into the depths of life. We must not, like the people I have just described, seek thought impulses for a new social order from what the times have brought. No, we must seek social impulses from the dawning age, from the impulses that are just emerging, from the impulses of spiritual knowledge; otherwise we will not arrive at real social impulses. Then, when they are found, they can be grasped by common sense, like all results of spiritual science. In this sense, I would also like to refer to our threefold social order.

Today it is necessary that in all things people learn, with the deepest honesty, to seek first true self-knowledge and secondly true knowledge of the world.

Consider what is called spiritual science here from the most diverse points of view. Certainly, as in some abstract mysticism and in some abstract occultism, there is also talk of self-knowledge in its necessity and of world knowledge in its necessity, but in a different way. It is said, as I would like to impress upon our age in particular, that one can never attain true self-knowledge without seeking this self-knowledge through knowledge of the world. Brooding over the self does not yield self-knowledge. Knowledge of the world first trains our self so that this self can attain self-knowledge. And again: no one can come to knowledge of the world without first finding their way into their own self. Knowledge of the world is not possible without self-knowledge. The two things even seem to contradict each other somewhat, but this contradiction is full of life and fruitful: knowledge of the world is not possible without self-knowledge, and self-knowledge is not possible without knowledge of the world. It is like the swinging of a pendulum, which must swing back and forth. So must man search in his life, constantly searching for the pendulum swing between self-experience and world experience, world experience and self-experience. But this alone gives strength to the soul, that inner activity of the soul which is becoming more and more necessary for the whole of humanity today and in the future. Because human beings, out of a certain egoism that is natural in the age of the consciousness soul, brood so easily within themselves, humanity in our age has fallen into a love of abstraction. It can no longer even judge for itself how strong the love of mere abstraction is in our age. But that is also why it is absolutely necessary that we rise up, precisely in order to cross the threshold I have described in the right way, that we move from a mere necessity of abstraction, a mere necessity of thought, to a fact. From mere abstract knowledge to an experience of facts. From thinking within ourselves, not in mere thoughts, but to a way of thinking that immerses itself in things and thinks with the things and events of the world. Only then can we remain equal to the present. Let me give you an example of this. However, I would like to point out from the outset that you should not interpret what I am about to say as if, in characterizing one or another worldview, I also wanted to take a position on that worldview. I only want to characterize, not judge.

What is called a scientific worldview, scientific thinking, has undergone a development that I have characterized for you from various points of view. It has ultimately arrived at a view such as that of Mauthner. But it has also expressed itself in other shades. I don't know if you remember a man I told you about here years ago, albeit in a different context and to characterize something else, a man who once wanted to describe the difficulty of self-knowledge in one of his books, which he called “Analysis of Sensations.” He wanted to describe the external difficulty of self-knowledge. And to illustrate this, he gave two examples where he was subject to quite strong illusions regarding self-knowledge even in relation to his outward appearance. Once, he says, he was walking down the street. Suddenly, someone came towards him—the person in question was a professor—and he thought to himself: What kind of schoolmaster figure is coming towards me? He found this figure completely unsympathetic, as he himself recounts. Then he realized what had happened: he had come to a shop window and saw himself walking down the street in the reflection. Another time, he got on a bus. Opposite the door through which he had entered was a mirror. He was terribly tired. He saw the image and said to himself: What kind of worn-out guy is getting on the bus at the other door? Only gradually did he realize that it was himself.

I have told you this, and you will be able to judge for yourself that this is, after all, a man to be taken seriously: Ernst Mach, the natural scientist who became a philosopher. Well, he has various students again. His worldview is not unlike that of Mauthner, except that Ernst Mach has not become so prone to doubt and uncertainty, but simply believes in the play of thoughts. The self is a mere myth to him, as it is to Mauthner, but Mach is satisfied with that. However, one must study Ernst Mach and then get to know his life, get to know his whole personality. I remember myself how I first saw Ernst Mach at the Vienna Academy of Sciences, where he gave a commemorative lecture on the economy of thought, in which he explained everything that one thinks as merely an arrangement of thoughts according to the principle of least effort. At the time, I was very angry about this representation of the thought process. Then he expanded on this and wrote his books, which had a great influence on many people. If you know anything about his life, you know that he was certainly a very, very good citizen, very obedient to the state he served through his teaching, and, in terms of his scholarship, a typical representative of the thinking that was developing in modern times. I could name another similar thinker. Mach himself did not teach in Zurich, but one of his students did: Friedrich Adler, the same Adler who later shot the Austrian minister Stürgkh. But a much more abstract and thoughtful man in Zurich espoused a worldview very similar to Mach's philosophy, to Mach's worldview: Richard Avenarius. I cannot advise you to read Avenarius' books; you would throw them away after the second page. They are written in an incomprehensible language. The only thing that would remain inexplicable to you is how it came about that so many people immersed themselves in Avenarius' books and formed a worldview based on his philosophy.

What I am discussing here are extreme cases that can draw your attention to the difference between a merely abstract logic of thought and a logic of facts. Avenarius was also, in his life, truly a good average citizen, a good citizen in the best sense of the word. But people like Ernst Mach, his student Adler, in whom it was already more apparent, and Avenarius—let's take Mach and Avenarius first—they feel nothing of the factual logic in which they stand through their own facts. For, you see, what has become of the worldview of Ernst Mach and Avenarius, these good, obedient, genuine bourgeois scholars? What has become of it? It has become the state philosophy of the Bolsheviks, the worldview that underlies Bolshevism. It has only passed through other human temperaments, through other human dispositions. Consistency with facts! Consistency with the factual logic of what Ernst Mach and Avenarius taught.

It is not just by chance that this philosophy was carried over to Russia, for example, through the studies of gifted Russian students with Avenarius and then with Adler in Zurich, but there is an inner spiritual connection. This can only be understood by those who do not think about things with their minds, but who can think within things, who know that it is not an abstract logical chain of consequences that leads from Avenarius and Mach to Lenin and Trotsky, but that a very real logic leads from one to the other. These are the things that matter today. They are accessible only to those who are serious about studying the inner workings of becoming. For we have arrived at a complicated time in our inner lives, where someone like Mach and Avenarius can believe that he is a man of order, that he is a man who lives only in spiritual heights of order, and does not suspect that what he teaches can become political dynamite when his thoughts pass from him to other souls.

Today, humanity is being called upon to find meaning in the deeper connections of life. Without this meaning, we cannot move forward. If we want to arrive at fruitful social ideas, then we must not, like Richard Avenarius and Ernst Mach, choose the dead end products of old worldviews that are self-destructive, but we must turn to that rebuilding of worldviews that can only be found in spiritual science and that alone knows how to ask the right questions: What must emerge as social order if human beings in the future, starting from the present and continuing into the future, increasingly proceed through the world in this inner threefold state — for they cross the threshold in an inner threefold state? The outer social order must be a reflection of this; the outer social order must also be threefold. Then the outer and the inner will correspond in the future. This threefold division, if one is able to consider it seriously with spiritual science, is not something contrived; it is something simply gleaned from the true inner development of humanity as it progresses from the present to the future.

Among all the other requirements placed on people today is that they develop the good will to engage in contemplation of the spiritual world. That they first develop the good will to contemplate themselves in such a way that what lies spiritually at the foundation of this human being becomes clear to them. Scientific materialism was a test, not something definitive. That is why it is so significant and useful, even in the form of Haeckelianism. It is all a test that must be passed. In it, human beings are placed in the animal chain because, when it comes down to it, in relation to everything that this view values, human beings appear to be nothing more than highly developed animals. But if we begin to consider man in relation to self-knowledge in connection with the world, the matter immediately takes on a different character. Things that are otherwise considered unimportant become important, and vice versa. Simply by standing on a particular point of view, a new light shines on the whole essence of man. Essentially, as we know, animals move across the earth in such a way that—and exceptions teach us a great deal about the essential nature of things—their spine runs parallel to the earth's surface. In the early stages of life, humans stand upright, aligning the main axis of their body, i.e., the direction of their spine, perpendicular to the surface of the earth, forming a cross with the surface of the earth in their spine and also forming a cross with the direction of the animal spine. By stating this, we clearly express the relationship of humans to the rest of the world. It is different with animals; it is different with humans. You can always read in Aaeckel: Human beings have just as many bones and muscles as higher animals. — But there are other things that cannot be counted, that exist in an intuitive, or rather imaginative, grasp of the form in its relationship to the overall design of the cosmos and the earth, and this grasp of form, not talking about the essence of man, is more important than counting bones and muscles, more important than what comparative morphology has to say about man.

Starting from there, I could now tell you many things that would show you that where the previous view of the world, which has produced such habits of thinking in human beings that have led them into their present misfortune, must come to an end, there, where this thinking and these habits of thinking end, something new must now begin, something that follows on from form, for example. This will then give rise to a spiritual view of the world, which will fertilize the independent, social spiritual organism.

And an even higher stage—these stages will not, as is usually the case with our contemporaries, only awaken in dreams and mysticism—an even higher stage will vividly grasp the being that is always around us, the “open secret,” as Goethe says. From there, we will ascend in such “awakening,” as I have called it in my books The Riddle of Man and The Riddle of the Soul, to what is now not merely a placing of the form into the cosmos, but a resonating with the great rhythmic vibrations of the cosmos.

You know that the human being consists of these three members: the nerve-sense system, the rhythmic system, and the metabolic system. In the nerve-sense system, he stands in such a way that he can grasp the form in relation to the cosmos. In relation to his feeling, the rhythmic, respiratory, or chest system, he stands within this rhythm in the rhythm of the whole world. We can initially grasp this rhythm — we could of course have much more, because we have mentioned many things from various points of view over the years — we can initially grasp this rhythm only at one corner. I just want to repeat what I have said many times before. We look at our breathing. When we breathe normally, we take 18 breaths per minute. That makes approximately 25,920 breaths in a 24-hour day. So in one day, we rhythmically inhale and exhale approximately 25,920 times. This is the smallest breath that our individual human being takes. You know, even in the Old Testament, the age of the patriarchs was assumed to be around 70 years. Of course, one can live longer, one can also die younger, but that is roughly the average age of human beings, 70 to 72 years. How many days of life are that? Very roughly calculated, 25,920 days of life. If you now take that great breath that is taken with us when we immerse ourselves in the morning with our ego and astral body into our etheric body and physical body, so that we breathe in our spiritual-soul life in the morning and breathe it out again in the evening, if you take that as one breath that is taken every day, then our day of life, which lasts approximately 71 years, consists of 25,920 breaths. This means that the great spirit that breathes when we are born and die breathes in its day, which encompasses our entire human life, as often as we breathe in and out in 24 hours. Thus, we are adapted with our human breathing to the spiritual breathing that the spirit performs, for which breathing in and out is what being born and dying is for us. We are the result of its breaths in our waking and sleeping lives. And the sun, which you can at least guess has a relationship to our experience: humans observe how its rising advances in the zodiac by a certain number of degrees each year, so that when the vernal equinox is at a certain point in a certain zodiac sign, it is shifted further the next year, and so on. Thus, the point where the sun rises appears to circle around the entire ecliptic in what is called a Platonic world year, which comprises 25,920 years. One day of our life contains 25,920 breaths, our life between birth and death contains 25,920 days, and one great solar year contains 25,920 of our years of life. In this way, we fit into what is breathed in the sun-earth process through a Platonic world year. Here you see a world rhythm through which human beings are integrated into the cosmos.

Without at least having the good will to recognize human beings in flexible knowledge in connection with the cosmos, you cannot gain any knowledge of human beings. You can no longer understand anything with today's natural science, strange as it may sound, such as human life up to birth. After human beings are born, something enters their lives that natural science can no longer grasp. Therefore, natural science must stop at embryology, which is a particularly popular method. This is particularly evident today in the fact that the entire theory of evolution is merely a development of embryology. Everything else is fantasy. When human beings begin to live on earth, it becomes necessary to understand them through imaginative, inspired knowledge. For only with this knowledge can one understand what human beings experience at death and what death is. Through the highest stage of knowledge, which you will find described in How to Know Higher Worlds as the stage of true intuition, one gains insight into the essence that is wonderfully hinted at in language itself when one says, with a certain degree of accuracy, that a corpse decays. If one could still feel this today when hearing these words, one would truly feel that decay means passing into being, entering into being, becoming one with being. When language speaks of decay, it does not truly speak of passing away. And the mysterious process that a future natural science will bring to light from the depths of knowledge, which only takes place when the human body appears to decay or burn, is not destruction; it is precisely something meaningful in the inner structure of the event.

Through a consideration such as today's, I would like to evoke a feeling of the inner connection between the dying worldview and scientific direction of olden times and the spiritual science that is still in its infancy, only now emerging, in the sense of what must become in the future. But these two things clash violently. And here a deep tragedy of modern life begins to become apparent, which we must overcome through inner human strength. What I call, however much one may resent me for it, the declining bourgeois worldview and conception of life, is a final end that is preparing its own downfall. What is still very far removed from what it is to become, what is emerging as proletarian longing, has other human foundations. While the bourgeois worldview is sinking into the etheric body, it is passing from the astral body into that which is developing from the proletarian world. And a terribly clear symbol of the dying worldview was the egoism of Max Stirner. You will find it described in context in my book “The Riddles of Philosophy.” We now live in an age in which we must try not to judge what is emerging by its outward appearance. No matter how much error there may be here and there today, we must be able to see what is developing today as a social movement out of the proletariat as the becoming of the future, precisely from the spiritual point of view of the human being. We must be able to see that humanity is crossing a threshold; it must enter into supersensible knowledge. And this is precisely what gives the spiritually discerning person a clear indication of the direction in which the proletarian world is heading, namely that it is behaving in a very materialistic way in this or that leader, in this or that bigwig, and is resisting what it will one day become. It is resisting. It has accepted the bourgeois way of thinking as its last inheritance, but in human development it is called upon to consciously cross the threshold, to work its way out of materialistic delusion to the real knowledge of the supersensible. Precisely what is pointed out here must be explored through observation of a spiritual undercurrent in such a way that it does not merely become abstract knowledge, but can become an inner impulse for our will. Then, at the right time, we will be able to place ourselves in the present social order in the right way and with full consciousness.