It is a Necessity of Our Earnest Times to Find Again the Path Leading to the Spirit
GA 203
27 February 1921, The Hague
Translator Unknown
The times in which we live are so earnest that at present it is not in any way appropriate to think of personal matters. Allow me, first of all, to express briefly my heartfelt thanks to your esteemed president for her kind words and then to pass on to what I believe I must tell you, for it is a long time since we saw one another in Holland.
The times in which we live and its conditions are much more earnest than most people of the present are consciously aware of.
Here we can speak of these conditions of our times from those standpoints which result from a long study of the spiritual science of Anthroposophy. We know that we live in an epoch whose characteristic peculiarity began to be evident in the 15th century. It was then that it slowly began to develop its peculiarities. Those who are initiated into the spiritual conditions of human evolution and can therefore have an insight into this course of development, know that the second half of the 19th century indicates a specially low point of human evolution in the modern and particularly in European culture. This low point may be characterised as the rise of a particular inthrust of egoism in all branches of civilised humanity, an egoism of a kind that was never there before. This wave of a special course of development then sent its ramifications into the 20th century, and now these ramifications undoubtedly continue to hold mankind under their spell.
In saying that a wave of egoism came over the whole modern civilisation, I do not speak trivially of what one generally defines as egoism, but I speak of egoism in a special sense, into which we shall penetrate a little in the course of this morning's considerations, and in a way that will be evident to those who are initiated in the true mysteries of more recent human evolution.
We already know the members constituting human nature. We know that the soul-members of human nature have been engaged for a long time in a special process of transformation, in a special course of development. We know that when we go back to very ancient times of human evolution we have to do with a particular forming of man's etheric body, during a very old time of development in India; a particular forming of the astral body then began, and a certain intermediate course of development took place during that epoch of European development which began about the year 747 in the south of Europe and which closed in the first thirty years of the 15th century. That time was the beginning of that epoch of human evolution in which we are still living. In the year 747 before the Mystery of Golgotha, began that phase of human evolution in which the so-called intellectual and understanding soul (Verstandes und Gemütsseele) unfolded. Everything that humanity still prizes to-day as Greek culture; developed through the fact that at that very time the intellectual or understanding soul was in an ascending line of development. However, while the wonderful Greek culture was unfolding, that which we call intellectual or understanding soul was in an ascending line of development. It had not yet reached its climax. For such points are always in a certain way times of probation for the evolution of humanity. For the sake of their development, the Greeks had to pass through what one might call the youthful freshness of the intellectual or understanding soul. The Greek culture, so much admired by posterity, came into being out of this youthful freshness of an intellect that was not yet permeated by egoism, out of this youthful freshness of the human understanding. Of the characteristics pertaining to the intellectual soul, the Latin and Roman culture then took over something that was in a descending line of development and decadent. Those who have a deeper comprehension for that which lived in Roman culture know: There the intellect already reaches its culmination; there the intellect rises to a high point. On that account the Romans developed such abstract ideas; on that account the Romans developed something that did not as yet exist in the whole ancient East, that did not even exist, in the sense known in Europe, in the Greek culture: The Romans developed the ideas of jurisprudence, the juridical concepts.
To-day we consider the world very superficially and we translate our thoughts on “Jus”, on jurisprudence, which, in reality are the outcome only of the Roman intellectual soul, into something which we assume to have already existed in the ancient East, for instance in Hammurabi, and so forth. But that is not the case. The Decalogue, the Ten Commandments as well as the contents of other documents of that time, were, after all, something quite different from that which constitutes our modern juridical concepts. These are something abstract, something that is no longer so close to the human soul. Everything that thus constitutes the development of the intellectual soul reached its climax during a period in the civilisation of Europe which has really been studied very little from an external historical standpoint, although it is extraordinarily important and significant for those who wish to study human evolution in the meaning of spiritual science.
That striking year to which we can draw attention as being specially significant for European development is the year 333 after the Mystery of Golgotha. The year 333 after the Mystery of Golgotha is the middle of the fourth post-Atlantean epoch. It is that point of time when a fluctuating knowledge of the universe lived in Europe simultaneously with a fluctuating knowledge of humanity. These had nothing of the penetrating character of the knowledge of the universe that the Greeks still possessed and no proper comprehension of man's inner world.
We find instead that man sways either towards the longing for an extensive knowledge of the universe, or towards the longing for self-knowledge, knowledge of his own self. The human soul of the European peoples indeed passed through a great deal during the fourth post-Atlantean epoch. Roman life was then entering into its decay; it bequeathed to European humanity nothing but its language; it left behind its more or less fundamental material of culture. The life of humanity thus entered the second half of the fourth post-Atlantean epoch, lasting up to the 15th century, when our present epoch began.
From the preceding epoch, in which most of us in some way passed through one or more earthly lives, we brought over—partly through physical heredity, but particularly through the fact that we ourselves formerly were those incarnated souls—into the fifth post-Atlantean epoch the inheritance of the fourth post-Atlantean epoch, and we took over this inheritance. This inheritance of the fourth post-Atlantean epoch lives in everything that constitutes our present civilisation.
We worked the intellect, the thinking, into our consciousness soul. That means a great deal. At the beginning of the fifth epoch, the consciousness soul enabling man to really permeate, really grasp his ego, first took hold of his thinking, his life of representations and his intellect. Humanity thus became intelligent and clever, but clever within the consciousness soul; within the evolution of humanity, this implies the finest possible elaboration of EGOISM.
We should not only rebuke this epoch of egoism, we should not only fall upon it with criticism, but in spite of the fact that it brings with it so many temptations and leads man into great soul-dangers and even into external danger, we should recognise this age of egoism as the one in which ego-consciousness comes to the fore with special incisiveness.
Man can thus take into himself a real feeling of freedom. This feeling of freedom is something that none of us possessed in our previous incarnations, in the earlier epochs of human evolution. We had to pass through egoism, that presents so many temptations, in order to reach that longing for freedom which is the prerogative of modern humanity. One of the most important things in Anthroposophy is the knowledge that we had to take in something in order to climb over an important stage in human evolution: the stage leading to the DEVELOPMENT OF FREEDOM. For this very reason we should be aware that this crossing over is connected, with many temptations, with many dangers of humanity, both soul-spiritually and bodily. A knowledge going in the direction of Anthroposophy must enable us to take in fully the feeling of freedom, but at the same time to ennoble it, to permeate it again with a spiritual knowledge of the universe, which—in spite of the now existing mature ego-feeling, mature ego-consciousness—induces mankind to solve tasks that are not only egoistic tasks, but tasks pertaining to the whole evolution of humanity, indeed to the evolution of the whole earth, to the evolution of the whole universe.
In this connection we are now facing a great turning point in the whole civilisation of more recent times. The time of probation has indeed come! Great tasks confront mankind. But the recognition of these tasks is extremely difficult and is rendered still more difficult through the fact that we have just passed through the age of the great egoism.
We say that we sleep from the moment of falling asleep to the moment of waking up. That is right. We are then in a state of dulled consciousness. Most of you know sleep only in its negative aspect, that it dulls consciousness. Yet we do not judge the waking state in the same way. The time of being awake, the time from the moment of falling asleep to the moment of waking up, was really quite different in the fourth post-Atlantean epoch. To-day people believe that they are awake in the same way in which, for instance, the people living about the time of the Mystery of Golgotha were awake. That is not the case. Their whole soul-constitution was different. Man was then awake in a different way. He was much more strongly conscious of his body.
You see, modern man really knows very little indeed of his bodily processes. The Greeks, not the Greeks of a later time, but the Greeks of the pre-Socratic and pre-Platonic times, still knew a great deal of the processes of their own body. For example, the really cultured Greek looked up to the sun. From the sun he received the light. He received at the same time a feeling that he was drawing in something etheric, that the light was being led on into his inner being. And when he was thinking, he said: The light, the sun thinks within me. The Greek of pre-Socratic times still felt this in a living way. He did not think so abstractly about thinking as we do to-day. He thought: The sun thinks within me: it allows its light to be drawn in by me. The light that shines upon the things outside, that makes the things outside visible, is active within me, by reflecting itself, as it were, within its own being, so that thoughts spring up in me. For the Greek, the thoughts within him were the light of the sun. At the same time, they were for him that element which lived in the macrocosm thanks to the influence of divine-spiritual beings. At the same time, they were for him that which really raised him to the Divine, above his ordinary dignity as a human being. He felt himself lifted above the earthly, when he thus experienced the sun's light within him as thinking. And when a particularly cultured Greek ate, he indeed considered his food, in which he took in something that he did not receive directly from the sun, but that came from the earth, as a necessity of life, yet at the same time he felt himself changing into the food, that became he himself, as it passed through his mouth, his oesophagus and digestive organs. He felt that he was one with the food, in the same way in which he felt that he was one with the sunlight. While he was digesting, he felt the earth's gravity. He felt, as it were, similar to the serpent, that he did not as yet highly appreciate, but that he still observed rather timidly—the serpent that twists away from the earth and digests in a particularly visible way, after having swallowed its food. That is how the Greek experienced what went on in his body: whether he experienced what was thinking within him as the sun's bright light, or whether he experienced within himself what chained him to the earth; i.e. the taking in of food. Through the intimate way in which his understanding was connected with his body the Greek felt with particular energy that which also lived within him as physical human being. You may also deduce this from the following:
When we paint human beings to-day in the ordinary way, as numerous painters of the present generation have done year after year, decade after decade in painting portraits, we really lie. We look at people outwardly and believe that then we bring forth something of what we experience. It is not true at all that we can experience something in that way! We could experience it only if we were able to conjure up within us the whole way of identifying ourselves feelingly with the whole of Nature as human beings, as it was the case with the Greeks. First of all, we must learn this anew, along an entirely different path than that of the Greeks.
Since the middle of the 15th century, we have acquired in an abstract-theoretical way a soul-constitution that no longer allows us to really penetrate livingly into our body, but that lives instead in concepts that do not stand visibly before us, because we have conquered thinking for the egoity, for the ego. We should realise this. And we should realise that we must once more take in spirituality from an anthroposophical spiritual science, so that the ego may once more be filled with something, and so that that which really lives within us may once more—but now in a different way—enter our life: that which the Greeks experienced in an immediate, elemental way; but that could not continue.
When the Greek walked, he walked as if led by a necessity of Nature, like the lightning flashing through the clouds, or the rolling thunder! He knew nothing whatever of freedom, but he knew man! Indeed, he knew more about man than we think he did. For instance, he knew how to coin words clearly indicating that man still knew something of the connection between the soul-spiritual and the bodily-physical. The Greek words, or those derived from the Greek, indicate even to-day far more than those based on our therapeutic or pathological conceptions, that are no longer able to understand anything. Hypochondria for instance, means cartilaginosity of the abdomen. It is a name that the Greeks found through their full knowledge of the fact that in hypochondric people the activity of the soul-spiritual gives rise to cartilaginous formations in certain parts of the body. These names mean far more than modern men suppose, and more than can in any way be grasped through modern medicine, with its abstract way of thinking, even though it experiments, dissects, etc. We must first take up again everything that is real, that once more enables us to have an insight into the world! It is the task of a spiritual scientific deepening to reach once more real facts, realities.
You see, during the fourth post-Atlantean epoch, in which the human beings passed through what constitutes, as it were, a physical self-knowledge, an insight into the human body, during that time—one might say approximately, during the first third of that time, occurs the greatest event of the earth's evolution: the Mystery of Golgotha.
What is the condition of the time in which the Mystery of Golgotha occurred?—The further we go back, the more we find in ancient times—in the Greek epoch, the Egyptian-Chaldean, the Persian and the ancient Indian epoch—this immediate knowledge of the whole human being. Then, this knowledge of the whole human being disappears. The last remains of that knowledge may be found at the time when the Mystery of Golgotha appeared. Something of that instinctive, ancient knowledge of man still existed at that time. For instance, the personalities described in the Gospels as the Apostles, or the Disciples of the Lord, still possessed something of that old instinctive knowledge, which lived in their souls altogether instinctively, not clearly. Others too possessed such a knowledge. At that time it was to a great extent decadent, but at any rate it still existed. It was dying away, burning out, but enough remained of that ancient knowledge to enable a great number of men of that time to grasp the Mystery of Golgotha accordingly. This is particularly evident when the apostle Paul entered the evolution of the times, the apostle Paul who was initiated by divine powers and to whom the spiritual world became visible.
All this gave rise to conditions of time which still enabled man to understand the Mystery of Golgotha in a certain naive, instinctive way. Many people had already entered a later phase of development. Particularly the cultured Greeks and the cultured Romans had concepts that were already far too abstract in order [to] grasp the Mystery of Golgotha in a really living way. Yet certain people had preserved the last remains of an old clairvoyant knowledge, particularly clairvoyant traditions, and they were still able to grasp that a super-earthly power, the Christ, had connected Himself with an earthly man, Jesus of Nazareth.
The year 333 after the Mystery of Golgotha, was, as it were, the year in which last stragglers of those who were still able to have a real understanding of the Mystery of Golgotha could be found in Europe. But these stragglers could not understand it, for instance, through our anthroposophical spiritual science, for this did not, of course, exist at that time. They grasped it through an old knowledge that had remained from the Gnosis, and such like. A certain spiritual knowledge still existed. An ancient human inheritance lived in the human soul and this enabled man to grasp the Mystery of Golgotha.
What has remained of the Mystery of Golgotha? Intellectual traditions!—The Gnosis became theology, a mere logical way of grasping the divine. Theo-Logy: a mere logical way of grasping the divine, no longer a contemplation of the divine!
Since the year 333, the capacity of contemplating the Mystery of Golgotha in a direct way became more and more decadent, until the fateful time of the 9th century, when, in the year 869, the Eighth General Oecumenic Council at Constantinople gave out the dogma that man does not consist of body, soul and spirit, but that it is instead a Christian's duty to acknowledge that man consists only of body and soul, and that the soul possesses a few spiritual qualities. At that time, the trichotomy, as it was called, the only possible knowledge of the human being, according to which man consists of body, soul and spirit, was done away with dogmatically, and a dogma was enforced, according to which a Christian who truly believes must acknowledge that man only consists of body and soul.
Modern philosophers frequently state that their philosophy is based on an unprejudiced knowledge, and they speak on the one hand of the body, and on the other of the soul. They speak of the spirit in a very phraseological manner at the most, for they do not know the spirit. They would only know it, if they recognised the spiritual science of Anthroposophy. The “impartial philosophy” that is now being taught to such an extent—what is it, in reality?—It is the result of the dogma pronounced by the Eighth Oecumenic Council in the year 869.
We must see through this. We must be quite clear that when the modern civilisation arose, and even in the second half of the fourth post-Atlantean epoch, it was considered as dangerous to speak of the spirit and to draw attention to it. But at the present time it is necessary that we should draw mankind's attention to the spirit,—the spirit that has been declared to be the devil for a long, long time, within the civilisation of Europe! After the year 333, nothing but traditions remained of the old Christological knowledge—nothing but traditions!
Everything that constitutes art shows us even more clearly that it has remained tradition! Observe, for instance, Cimabue's paintings; there you will see a world that took on a completely different aspect in Giotto's paintings. In Cimabue's paintings lived something that may also be seen in Dante, something that could no longer be experienced by the human beings of a later time! Later on, this living within a spiritual world, that may still be seen in Cimabue, ceased. Later on, it was a hypocrisy to paint a golden background, but for a Cimabue this was quite natural. And now observe a Russian icon; it is not in any way painted after a model, for it is something in which the old traditions are still alive, traditions that come from a clairvoyance still existing at the time of the Mystery of Golgotha and enabling man to understand the Mystery of Golgotha.
Then came the time in which the traditions were maintained by using external instruments of power. And then came the 19th century, in which the ordinary soul-activity that brought forth such significant results in natural science and technology, was also applied to theology. But what became of theology through this? Christ-Jesus, the incarnation of a Being that does not belong to the earthly became “the simple man of Nazareth,” looked upon indeed as the most perfect man, but not as the bearer of a super-earthly Being. Theology became naturalistic. The more our modern theologians look upon Jesus of Nazareth as a human being, the less they feel induced to pursue Christological ideas, and the happier they are! Even in theology they do not wish to rise beyond the description of the man, Jesus of Nazareth, they do not wish to rise to an understanding of Christ as a super-earthly Being that dwelt in the man, Jesus of Nazareth.
To-day, those who have an insight into world-events from a spiritual standpoint, must see many things differently from the way in which they are judged by people who only see them outwardly. Central Europe, that is now passing through such a tragic destiny, was able—among other things which cannot be discussed here—to accept Adolf Harnack as a great scientist; the very man who reached the point of saying that God the Son should not be included in the Gospels! They should be read, he says, in such a way as to find in them only the man, Jesus of Nazareth, and this man's teachings concerning God the Father. Harnack's theology was intended to do away with our feelings of reverence for the spirituality of Christ. The theology which Harnack established in Central Europe really signifies the negation of Christianity, the denial of Christianity; it signifies the setting up of a world-conception clearly stating that we do not wish to have anything to do with the spirituality of Christ. It is significant to observe what has thus swept over modern humanity, with the result that the most distorted views now exist concerning the most important ideas of human life.
To-day we know what sleep is, from the moment of falling asleep to the moment of waking up. Yet we do not, as a rule, observe the other kind of sleep, in which we live from the moment of waking up to the moment of falling asleep, when we walk about in our everyday life, steeped in illusions and dreams in regard to its most important facts. Indeed, in these modern times, we do not only sleep when we lie in our bed at night (this is actually the better kind of sleep), but we are also asleep in the sphere of egoism, when we lock ourselves up in our inner being, unwilling to know our human body and, at the same time, unwilling to progress to a spiritual self-knowledge. We sleep another kind of sleep during the time from falling asleep to waking up.
In order to understand this, we must indeed observe the nature of sleep from the moment of falling asleep to that of waking up. What does then take place with the human being? Why does the modern intellect believe that as far as the human constitution is concerned sleep is the same for modern man as it was for the ancient Greeks?—The Greeks were not awake in the same way as we, and the Egyptians even less so, nor did they sleep as we do. This soul-constitution in particular should be studied for every epoch of time.
When, during sleep, the human soul, that is to say, the ego and the astral body, loosens itself from the physical and etheric bodies that remain lying on the bed—where does the soul, that is the ego and the astral body, really dwell while we are asleep?
Superficial explanations that a cloud may be seen hovering over the physical body (which is quite true, as far as an altogether external form of clairvoyance is concerned), do not suffice. This is not sufficient, for we must observe what takes place inwardly. We must observe what the soul really experiences from the moment of falling asleep to the moment of waking up. In these modern times, the human soul then passes through experiences that are also lived through by the souls that are not as yet incarnated on the earth. Consider the following: Take a case that came to my notice just now, before I began my lecture: A daughter was born to an anthroposophist; one year ago, this little girl lived in the spiritual world as body and soul, and has since then made the endeavour to descend to the physical world. All those decades, that make us so much older than this little newly born girl, during all those years it lived in the spiritual world. And while we were asleep, we lived from the moment of falling asleep to the moment of waking up, in the world in which the little girl dwelt before conception, or birth. That is the world in which we dwell, when we are asleep, and there, the souls that are not yet incarnated pass through many experiences. While we are asleep, we pass with them through the fifth post-Atlantean age and through events resembling their own experiences.
From the moment of waking up to the moment of falling asleep, we live, on the other hand, in a world that we sleep away during our waking life; we live in everything that we inherited from our past earthly existences. We live together with what has remained behind from ancient India, Persia, or Egypt; we live with what we have experienced spiritually here on earth, and this is cramped together egoistically in our inner being. We bring it along with us into our present incarnation. During the day, we live with all these things, and sleep away the present. Indeed, the present contains many things that can only be grasped spiritually. We cramp ourselves egoistically in ideas that come from the past and adhere to them obstinately even in our language, in our speech. Languages contain a great store of ancient crystallized wisdom. Yet we rebel against any kind of influence that may be exercised upon our souls by this ancient store of wisdom. For instance, to-day we use the words “Messer”, knife, or “Schere”, scissors. When we use the word “Schere”, scissors, we do not as a rule think that it comes from a kind of “Scheren”, or shearing, that is announced in every barber's shop! And when we use the word “Messer”, knife, we do not think that it is really based on a moral idea, for it is connected with “Maass”, measure, and “Zumessen”, to mete out, or cut to measure. When a knife was used in ancient times, it was really used to “mete out” a gift for someone. A store of wisdom lies crystallized in the words we use, and this ancient spiritual life that is contained in the words now uttered so thoughtlessly, lives in the depths of our being. Whenever we speak, we really experience the life of ancient epochs.
Spiritually, we pass through ancient epochs of the earth, from the moment of waking up to the moment of falling asleep, but we pass through them in a sleeping condition. And from the moment of falling asleep to the moment of waking up, we pass through events that are connected with the descent of human souls to their life on earth.
You see, these are realities, these are truths. These realities should be well impressed upon us, if we do not only wish to become acquainted with the forces of decay, but also with the forces of growth and progress. It would be so much better if, before going to sleep in the evening, a greater number of people were to do other things than those which they are accustomed to do! Consider what many people generally do, as last thing, before they go to bed! Yet a modern man should say to himself: I wish to enter the world that contains the forces of growth and progress, it is the world in which I can experience those forces that lead the human souls down to the earth, a world in which I can experience those forces spiritually.
From the moment of falling asleep to the moment of waking up we experience the forces pertaining to the future. For that reason, we should have a kind of craving for the teachings that speak of a spiritual world and that enable us to be conscious of the experiences of souls that are in a condition (but consciously) resembling that of souls who are asleep here on earth. The impulses for the progress of civilisation, for the healing of civilisation, must come from that world! The spiritual, political and economic impulses that should unfold as healing powers for our civilisation must come from that world! It is necessary, at the present time, that we should once more acquire the possibility of grasping the Mystery of Golgotha, of grasping it in a spiritual way.
What is the essential, or let us say, one of the essential things (for there are, of course, many essential things in it), in the Mystery of Golgotha?—That a God, a super-earthly Being, took up His abode in the man, Jesus of Nazareth. Beings of His kind have one characteristic quality: they cannot die. All those Beings of the higher Hierarchies, described in my “OCCULT SCIENCE”, the Angels, Archangels, etc. up to the highest Beings, the Cherubim, Seraphim, etc. do not die (read the description of their life's course in my books), they do not die as men die. What did Christ take upon Himself, Christ Who came from the higher Hierarchies?—He died within a human body. You see, here we have significant forces that pass over into the evolution of humanity upon the earth, Christ died in a human body; he passed through the experience of death, an experience unknown to the other gods who are connected with the earth. Up to the year 333, it was still possible to grasp this truth to a certain extent. Now we must learn to grasp it anew! We should grasp anew that a super-earthly Being shared with us the experience of death, thus passing over into the development of the earth. Yet at the same time we should have the great modesty of recognising that the experiences of this Being highly surpass what can be experienced through the soul-constitution of a human being.
The Christ descended from worlds where death is unknown. What Beings serve the Christ?—Among those who serve Him, there is not one who could make the same sacrifice, not one who could have come down to the earth, in order to pass through death. Beings that belong to the hierarchy of the Angeloi, right up to the higher Hierarchies, Beings connected with the evolution of the earth, are Christ's servants. We cannot perceive them, if we do not rise to a super-earthly knowledge of the higher Hierarchies. Through a knowledge of the spiritual worlds we should seek that which leads us to Christ. Spiritual science is needed above all in order to attain a new knowledge of Christ. For Christ is here, upon the earth, and He is surrounded by the world of the higher Hierarchies. Man's great temptation in modern times is the modern natural science with its great triumphs and its admission of purely external forces of Nature. Yet behind all these forces of Nature live the spiritual Beings! The assertions of natural science are certainly right, nevertheless the spiritual Beings that serve Christ live behind the forces of Nature, thinking and directing them. Christ lives in everything that constitutes the development of the earth. Super-earthly Beings serve Him—but these super-earthly Beings can only be recognised through spiritual science. Consequently an extremely important task evolves upon spiritual science: the renewal of Christianity.
All this shows you that to-day we cannot pursue spiritual science merely as a personal concern. To-day spiritual science concerns civilised humanity as a whole. Through an inner necessity, spiritual science was from the very beginning pursued in the circle that afterwards obtained the name of “Anthroposophical Society”, in a different way than in the Theosophical Society. The whole constitution of the Theosophical Society had, from the very outset, a sectarian character, something that reckoned with the egoism of modern times. Anthroposophy therefore had the task of taking into account the consciousness of modern times, that which constitutes the external culture of humanity, and of pouring into it the results of a spiritual manner of contemplation. Little differences and strifes are of no importance whatever in the face of such a task. It was essential for me to maintain the purity of a spiritual movement that reckons with the whole science of modern times. Whether this or that person may or may not accept one or the other truth, is of no importance to me. Even though the whole world may abuse spiritual science and criticize it, I do not consider this as essential, for the essential thing is that the spiritual science that I advance should really harmonize fully, with the modern, scientific mentality, with the moral conscience of modern times. For this reason, I had to publish my “Philosophy of Spiritual Activity” before revealing the truths of Karma. I have often listened with great pain to theosophists who said: If this or that man suffers, if he suffers socially and belongs to a lower class or caste, it is his Karma and he has deserved it. This interpretation of the idea of Karma corresponded to the egoistical requirements of men who lived in the 19th and 20th century. Yet they did not think that we do not only live through our present life on earth, but that we shall also live through a future life. To-day we should not always look back on what we once possessed in past lives on earth, but we should also consider that in future lives on earth we shall be looking back on what we are passing through now—and this will then be an entirely new experience. Freedom fully harmonizes with the idea of Karma ... Everything that appears in the account-book of life is karmically connected.
You see, if I reckon up the debit and credit sides of destiny and strike the balance, I obtain life's balance; but this does not entail that the single items are subjected to the necessity of Nature. Just as the single items of a commercial account book do not depend on diligence, and so forth, and finally enable us to strike a balance, so freedom can very well be connected with the idea of Karma. We should not adopt an easy fatalistic idea when advancing the view of Karma as a fully justified idea. Spiritual science should therefore be in full harmony also with the conscience and the moral attitude of modern humanity. For that reason it was necessary to work more extensively with spiritual science, also during the time in which the catastrophe broke out in regard to everything that has been caused by the egoism of modern humanity, both soul-spiritually and physically.
Would it have been honest and straightforward to continue preaching that spiritual science can help mankind, and yet advance no social ideas at a time when social requirements became as urgent as they are to-day? Would human love not have progressed in the direction of a social knowledge? Shall we content ourselves with declamations on human love? Or should we not rather progress to real social impulses?
The fact that we can only see Christ's ministering spirits, clearly when we look into the spiritual world, is a result and a fundamental knowledge of spiritual science, a result of what I have told you to-day concerning waking and sleeping, concerning sleeping wakefulness and the awakening from sleep through spiritual science. Spiritual science will also enable us to grasp once more the Mystery of Golgotha, in accordance with a modern mentality. And as a result, spiritual science must not restrict itself to some sectarian group, but if must be brought out into the world in the best possible way, according to our capacities and to our place in life! The centre at Dornach was not intended to be a sectarian centre, but one that renders fruitful every branch of science and life, social life and artistic life. Anthroposophy and its spiritual science must become a concern of the great masses of humanity, although its most important things and that which penetrates into the innermost depths of our heart, awakening our inner forces, are pursued within the narrower circles of our Groups. There, in those Groups, we gather forces, in order to develop a certain higher knowledge, which we must first take in there. It is a knowledge that must be developed, for to-day we live in a time in which mankind really does not know what it is seeking; it sleeps away the most important things of life. Nevertheless it is a time in which mankind seeks after a new knowledge of the spirit! Let us feel this deeply, as pioneers, I might say, of a spiritual renewal—as Anthroposophists.
For that reason I so warmly wish that also the Groups in Holland might pursue an earnest, diligent and untiring study of the knowledge that can be obtained in our movement, from out the spiritual worlds. I warmly wish that our Groups should study diligently. These studies should constitute the point of departure for bringing out Anthroposophy into the world—and each one must do this in his own way—so that mankind's longings may be satisfied through a spiritual contemplation directed towards Anthroposophy. For that reason, let us grasp the nature of the longings of modern man. Let us not think that we become materialistic, when we spiritualize matter! And let us clearly realise that mankind would face a great misfortune, if it fails to obtain the true knowledge that is able to avert that misfortune.
The Eighth Oecumenic Council of the year 869 drove away from human knowledge the contemplation of the spirit. Those who have an entirely materialistic mentality seek to prepare the next stage: they also wish to eliminate the soul and to establish the general dogmatic knowledge that man only consists of the body. Certain devilish initiates are now excogitating means of educating the human being materialistically, of preparing him materialistically as a body; they seek to attain their end not by means of psychic influences, but by means of ingredients and substances taken from Nature. They plan an experimental psychology and seek to adopt principles that are not those of the Waldorf School (for the Waldorf School principles are spiritual protests against modern materialism), and they already undertake all manner of experiments in order to test man's capacities. This is but a preliminary stage of what they really aim at. The child is no longer to be educated psychically, but with the aid of external, material means, so that its capacities may develop in a bodily way. Thus man would gradually become an automaton, unless we bear in mind at the right moment that the path that led to the elimination of the spirit must not be continued in the direction of the elimination of the soul as well. We must instead follow the opposite direction of the Eighth Oecumenic Council; we must once more follow the path enabling us to find the spirit anew, and to cultivate in human life, in every sphere of practical human life, only what we can discover through the spirit.
This is what I wish to implant into your souls, what I wish to implant into your hearts, my dear friends, after our long absence. Cultivate spiritual science first of all as a concern of the heart, in the way in which it should be cultivated individually, so that we may progress. Cultivate what you have thus taken in, and then bring it out to humanity in every sphere of life, bring out what you have thus taken in! You will then gradually find the path enabling you, in the present difficult and earnest time of probation, to do the right thing for humanity, according to your place in life.
Dreizehnter Vortrag
[ 1 ] Die Zeiten, in denen wir leben, sind so ernst, daß es nicht angeht, irgendwie gegenwärtig an persönliche Verhältnisse zu denken. Und so gestatten Sie, daß ich nur mit einigen Worten kurz Ihrer verehrten Vorsitzenden den herzlichsten Dank für ihre lieben Worte ausspreche, und daß ich gleich übergehe zu dem, was ich glaube, Ihnen zu sagen zu haben, nachdem wir uns ja längere Zeit hier in Holland nicht gesehen haben.
[ 2 ] Die Zeitverhältnisse, in denen wir leben, sind viel ernster, als die meisten Menschen der Gegenwart in ihr Bewußtsein aufgenommen haben. Diese Zeitverhältnisse dürfen wir ja hier von denjenigen Gesichtspunkten aus besprechen, die uns ein langjähriges Studium der anthroposophischen Geisteswissenschaft an die Hand gibt. Wir wissen, daß wir in einer Zeitepoche leben, welche in ihrer besonderen Eigenart im 15. Jahrhundert begonnen hat. Damals hat sie langsam ihre Eigentümlichkeiten zu entwickeln begonnen. Und diejenigen, welche als in die geistigen Verhältnisse der Menschheitsentwickelung Eingeweihte diese Entwickelung überschauen können, wissen, daß die zweite Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts einen besonderen Tiefstand der menschlichen Entwickelung bedeutet innerhalb der neuzeitlichen, insbesondere der europäischen Zivilisation. Und dieser Tiefstand, den wir charakterisieren können als das Heraufkommen eines besonderen Einschlages von Egoismus in alle Glieder der zivilisierten Menschheit, eines Egoismus, wie er vorher nicht da war, diese Welle einer besonderen Entwickelung hat dann ihre furchtbaren Ausläufer hereingeschickt in das 20. Jahrhundert, und diese Ausläufer halten gegenwärtig durchaus noch die Menschheit in ihrem Bann.
[ 3 ] Wenn ich sage: Eine Welle von Egoismus ist heraufgezogen in der ganzen modernen Zivilisation -, so spreche ich nicht im trivialen Sinn von dem, was man gewöhnlich Egoismus nennt, sondern ich spreche in dem Sinn von Egoismus, wie wir es im Laufe dieser heutigen Vormittagsbetrachtung noch ein wenig durchschauen wollen, und wie es klar ist demjenigen, der eben in die eigentlichen Geheimnisse der neueren Menschheitsentwickelung eingeweiht ist.
[ 4 ] Wir kennen ja die Glieder der menschlichen Natur. Wir wissen, daß seit langer Zeit die seelischen Glieder der menschlichen Natur in einer besonderen Umgestaltung, in einer besonderen Entwickelung begriffen sind. Wir wissen, daß, wenn wir in uralte Zeiten der Menschheitsentwickelung zurückgehen, wir dann innerhalb einer uralten indischen Entwickelung es zu tun haben mit einer besondern Formung des menschlichen Ätherleibes, daß dann aber beginnt eine besondere Formung des Astralleibes, und daß eine gewisse mittlere Entwickelung stattgefunden hat während jenes Zeitraumes der europäischen Entwickelung, die etwa um das Jahr 747 vor Christus im Süden Europas begonnen hat, und die ihren Abschluß gefunden hat eben im ersten Drittel des 15. Jahrhunderts. Damals hat jene Epoche menschlicher Entwickelung begonnen, in der wir noch heute drinnenstehen. 747 vor dem Mysterium von Golgatha beginnt diejenige Entwickelungsphase der Menschheit, in der namentlich die sogenannte Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele sich entfaltete. Und alles dasjenige, was die Menschheit heute noch schätzt als griechische Kultur, hat sich dadurch entwickelt, daß gerade in dieser Zeit die Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele in ihrer höchsten Entwickelung war. Allerdings, während sich die ganz wunderbare griechische Kultur entwickelte, war das, was wir Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele nennen, in aufsteigender Entwickelung. Es war noch nicht an seinem Höhepunkt angekommen. Denn solche Höhepunkte sind immer für die Menschheitsentwickelung in gewisser Weise auch Prüfungszeiten. Die Griechen hatten zu ihrer Entwickelung die Jugendfrische, könnte man sagen, der Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele durchzumachen. Und aus dieser Jugendfrische eines noch nicht vom Egoismus durchdrungenen Verstandes, aus dieser Jugendfrische des menschlichen Gemütes heraus ist dann die ja auch von der Nachwelt so bewunderte griechische Zivilisation entstanden. Das Lateinertum, das Römertum hat dann schon etwas übernommen von diesem Verstandesseelencharakter, was in absteigender, in dekadenter Entwickelung war. Wer ein tieferes Verständnis hat für dasjenige, was in der Römerkultur lebte, der weiß, daß der Verstand da schon in seine Kulmination kommt. Da geht es mit dem Verstande zu einem Höhepunkte hinauf. Daher haben die Römer so abstrakte Begriffe ausgebildet, haben dasjenige ausgebildet, was es für das ganze alte Morgenland noch nicht gab, was es in dem Sinne, wie wir es in Europa kennen, auch für das Griechentum nicht gegeben hat: die Römer haben die Rechtsbegriffe, die juristischen Begriffe ausgebildet. Man betrachtet heute die Welt außerordentlich äußerlich; und man betrachtet dasjenige, was wir über das Jus, über das Recht denken, was eigentlich erst aus der römischen Verstandesseele herauskommt, als etwas, was auch schon im alten Morgenland, etwa bei Hammurabi und dergleichen vorhanden gewesen wäre. Das ist aber nicht der Fall. Sowohl der Dekalog, die Zehn Gebote, wie auch dasjenige, was in anderen Dokumenten aus jener Zeit vorhanden ist, war im Grunde genommen etwas ganz anderes als dasjenige, was unsere modernen Rechtsbegriffe sind. Die sind etwas Abstraktes, etwas, was der menschlichen Seele nicht mehr ganz nahe ist. Und alles das, was in dieser Weise Verstandesentwickelung ist, hat seinen Höhepunkt erreicht innerhalb der europäischen Zivilisation in einem Zeitalter, das eigentlich äußerlich geschichtlich wenig studiert wird, das aber für den, der die menschliche Entwickelung im geistigen Sinne betrachten will, außerordentlich wichtig und bedeutsam ist.
[ 5 ] Das markante Jahr, auf das man da hinweisen kann als für die europäische Entwickelung in ganz besonderer Weise wichtig, ist das Jahr 333 nach dem Mysterium von Golgatha. 333 nach dem Mysterium von Golgatha ist die Mitte des vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraumes. Es ist derjenige Zeitpunkt, in dem eine fluktuierende Welterkenntnis und eine fluktuierende Menschheitserkenntnis zu gleicher Zeit in Europa lebte. Nichts von einer eindringlichen Welterkenntnis, wie die Griechen sie noch hatten; nichts auch von einem ordentlichen Erfassen des Inneren ist vorhanden, dafür aber ein Schwanken der Menschen bald hin zu der Sehnsucht nach großen Welterkenntnissen, bald hin zu der Sehnsucht nach Eigenerkenntnis, nach Selbsterkenntnis. Die Menschenseele der europäischen Völker hat ja viel durchgemacht gerade in diesem vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraum. Das Römertum schickte sich dazumal an zu seinem Untergang. Es überließ dann nur seine Sprache, es überließ sein gewissermaßen wertvolles Kultur-Hauptmaterial der europäischen Menschheit. Und so lebte dann die Menschheit durch die zweite Hälfte dieses vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraumes bis in das 15. Jahrhundert herein, in dem der unsrige begonnen hat.
[ 6 ] Wir haben von dem vorhergehenden Zeitraum, in dem die meisten Menschen von uns ein oder mehrere Erdenleben durchgemacht haben, in irgendeiner Weise - teilweise durch physische Vererbung, namentlich aber dadurch, daß wir die vorher inkarnierten Seelen waren - in unseren fünften nachatlantischen Zeitraum das Erbe dieses vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraumes hereingetragen und dieses Erbe angetreten. In allem, was heute unsere Zivilisation ist, lebt dieses Erbe des vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraumes.
[ 7 ] Wir haben den Verstand, das Denken in die Bewußtseinsseele hereingearbeitet. Das bedeutet viel. Die Bewußtseinsseele, die den Menschen zur eigentlichen Durchdringung, zum eigentlichen Verständnis seines Ich bringt, hat sich im Beginn dieses fünften Zeitraumes zunächst des Denkens, des Vorstellungslebens, des Intellektes bemächtigt. Die Menschheit ist gescheit, ist klug geworden, aber klug innerhalb der Bewußtseinsseele. Das ist in der Menschheitsentwickelung die Ausarbeitung des Egoismus bis zum feinsten Raffinement. Diese Zeit des Egoismus dürfen wir nicht bloß schelten, wir dürfen uns nicht bloß kritisierend über sie hermachen, sondern wir müssen dieses Zeitalter des Egoismus, trotzdem es so viele Versuchungen bringt, trotzdem es den Menschen in so große seelische und auch äußerliche Gefahren bringt, als dasjenige anerkennen, in dem das Ich-Bewußtsein in seiner besonderen Schärfe auftritt. Dadurch wird es den Menschen möglich, ein richtiges Gefühl der Freiheit in sich aufzunehmen. Dieses Gefühl von der Freiheit, das haben wir in unseren früheren Inkarnationen, in den früheren Epochen der Menschheitsentwickelung alle nicht gehabt. Wir mußten durch den Egoismus, der so viele Versuchungen darbietet, durchgehen, um zu der Sehnsucht nach Freiheit zu kommen, wie sie nur die moderne Menschheit hat. Und das gehört zu den wichtigsten anthroposophischen Erkenntnissen, daß wir wissen: wir mußten etwas aufnehmen, um eine wichtige Etappe der Menschheitsentwickelung zu übersteigen, die Etappe zur Freiheitsentwickelung. Aber wir müssen uns eben gerade deshalb bewußt sein, daß dieses Überschreiten mit vielen Versuchungen, mit vielen Gefahren in seelisch-geistiger und auch in leiblicher Beziehung für die Menschheit verknüpft ist. Und anthroposophisch orientierte Erkenntnis muß uns die Möglichkeit bringen, das Freiheitsgefühl voll aufzunehmen, aber zu gleicher Zeit es zu veredeln, es zu durchdringen wiederum mit einer geistigen Welterkenntnis, welche trotz des reifen vorhandenen Ich-Gefühls, des reifen vorhandenen IchBewußtseins doch die Menschheit dazu bringt, Aufgaben zu lösen, die nicht bloß Aufgaben des Egoismus, sondern Aufgaben der ganzen Menschheitsentwickelung, ja der ganzen Erdenentwickelung, der ganzen Weltentwickelung sind.
[ 8 ] In dieser Beziehung stehen wir heute vor einem großen Wendepunkte in der ganzen neueren Zivilisation. Es ist einmal eine Zeit der Prüfungen da. Vor den Menschen stehen große Aufgaben. Aber das Erkennen dieser Aufgaben ist außerordentlich schwierig, und es ist noch dadurch erschwert, daß wir eben durch das Zeitalter des großen Egoismus durchgegangen sind.
[ 9 ] Wir schlafen vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen. Das ist richtig. Wir sind da in einem Zustand herabgedämpften Bewußtseins. Wohl die meisten von Ihnen kennen den Schlaf durch die negative Art, wie er sich ankündigt, eben dadurch, daß das Bewußtsein herabgedämpft ist. Aber nicht in derselben Weise beurteilen die Menschen die Zeit des Wachseins. Diese Zeit des Wachseins, die Zeit vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen, die war eigentlich anders noch für den vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraum. Die Menschen glauben ja heute, daß sie so wachen, wie auch, sagen wir, um die Zeit des Mysteriums von Golgatha die Menschen gewacht haben. Das ist nicht der Fall. Die ganze Seelenverfassung war eine andere. Die Menschen wachten dazumal anders. Sie hatten ein viel stärkeres Bewußtsein von ihrem Leibe. Sehen Sie, der heutige Mensch weiß ja im Grunde genommen von den leiblichen Vorgängen außerordentlich wenig. Die Griechen, allerdings nicht die Griechen der späteren Zeit, aber die Griechen der vorsokratischen oder vorplatonischen Zeit wußten von den Vorgängen des eigenen Leibes noch außerordentlich viel. Der wirklich gebildete Grieche sah zum Beispiel zur Sonne auf. Er empfing von der Sonne das Licht. Er empfing damit ein Gefühl, daß er etwas Ätherisches einsaugte, daß er selber in seinem Inneren das Licht fortgeleitet erhielte. Und wenn er dachte, dann sagte er: Das Licht, die Sonne denkt in mir. Das war für den Griechen der vorsokratischen Zeit noch ein reales Gefühl. Er dachte nicht so abstrakt über das Denken, wie wir heute abstrakt über das Denken denken. Er dachte: Die Sonne denkt in mir; sie läßt ihr Licht durch mich aufsaugen; das Licht, das da draußen die Dinge bescheint, das da draußen die Dinge sichtbar macht, das wirkt in mir, indem es sich gewissermaßen in sich selber zurückspiegelt so, daß in mir die Gedanken aufkeimen. — Die Gedanken, die in ihm waren, waren dem Griechen Sonnenlicht. Sie waren ihm zu gleicher Zeit dasjenige, was in ihm lebte dank der Wirkung göttlich-geistiger Wesenheiten im Makrokosmos. Sie waren ihm zu gleicher Zeit dasjenige, was ihn eigentlich über seine gewöhnliche Menschenwürde zu dem Göttlichen hinaufhob. Der Mensch empfand sich über das Irdische hinausgehoben, wenn er so das Sonnenlicht in sich als Denken erlebte. - Und wenn der besonders gebildete Grieche aß, so betrachtete er zwar das Essen, womit er dasjenige aufnahm, was nicht die Sonne direkt gibt, sondern was aus der Erde kommt, als eine Lebensnotwendigkeit, aber er fühlte sich zu gleicher Zeit verwandelt in die Speisen, die durch seinen Mund, durch seine Speiseröhre, durch die übrigen Verdauungsorgane er selbst wurden. Er fühlte sich eins mit diesen Speisen, wie er sich eins fühlte mit dem Sonnenlicht. Und er fühlte die Schwere der Erde, indem er verdaute. Er fühlte sich gewissermaßen wie die ja von ihm noch nicht hochgeschätzte, sondern etwas scheu beobachtete Schlange, welche sich der Erde entwindet, welche aber, wenn sie gegessen hat, das Verdauen in einer ganz besonders sichtbaren Weise besorgt. So fühlte der Grieche dasjenige, was in seinem Leibe vorging, sei es dasjenige, was er als das helle Sonnenlicht, das in ihm dachte, empfand, sei es, daß er dasjenige, was ihn an das Irdische kettete, das Speiseaufnehmen, in sich erlebte. Er fühlte durch die innige Verbindung des Verstandes mit dem eigenen Leibe dasjenige, was in ihm auch als physischer Mensch lebte, auf eine besonders energische Art. Das können Sie auch aus folgendem entnehmen.
[ 10 ] Wenn wir heute in der gewöhnlichen Weise Menschen malen, wie es Jahr für Jahr, Jahrzehnt für Jahrzehnt innerhalb der jetzigen Generation zahlreiche Maler gemacht haben, so lügen wir ja eigentlich. Wir sehen die Menschen von außen an und glauben, daß wir da irgend etwas hervorbringen von dem, was wir erleben. Es ist ja gar nicht wahr, daß wir das erleben können. Wir könnten es nur erleben, wenn wir heraufzaubern könnten in uns die Art und Weise, wie sich der Mensch mit der ganzen Natur durchfühlte, so wie es bei den Griechen der Fall war. Dieses müssen wir ja erst wiederum lernen auf einem ganz anderen Wege, als es die Griechen gehabt haben. Wir haben seit der Mitte des 15. Jahrhunderts abstrakt-theoretisch eine solche innere Seelenverfassung erlangt, die uns nicht mehr unseren Leib wirklich durchleben läßt, sondern die in Vorstellungen lebt, welche unanschaulich sind, weil wir das Denken für die Egoität erobert haben, für das Ich. Dessen müssen wir uns bewußt sein. Und wir müssen uns bewußt werden, daß wir wiederum Geistigkeit aufnehmen müssen aus anthroposophisch orientierter Geisteswissenschaft, damit die Egoität mit etwas angefüllt werden könne, damit wiederum dasjenige in unser Leben komme, jetzt auf eine andere Art, was in uns wirklich ist, was die Griechen unmittelbar elementar erlebt haben, was aber nicht hat fortdauern können. Denn schließlich, wenn der Grieche ging, so ging er mit einer Naturnotwendigkeit, ähnlich wie wenn der Blitzstrahl durch die Wolken zuckt, wie wenn der Donner rollt. Er kannte nichts von Freiheit. Er kannte den Menschen. Er wußte sogar mehr über den Menschen, als man heute meint. Er wußte zum Beispiel noch Worte zu geben, die deutlich zeigen, daß der Mensch etwas wußte von dem Zusammenhang zwischen Geistig-Seelischem und Physisch-Leiblichem. Die griechischen Worte, oder diejenigen Worte, die vom Griechen geblieben sind, sind heute noch viel bezeichnender als diejenigen, die aus unserer nichts mehr erkennenden therapeutischen oder pathologischen Anschauung kommen. Hypochondrie zum Beispiel ist Unterleibsknorpeligkeit. Das ist etwas, was die Griechen aus ihrer vollen Erkenntnis, wie die Knorpeligkeit in einem gewissen Teile des Leibes durch das Schaffen des SeelischGeistigen ist bei solchen Menschen, die hypochondrisch sind, als Namen gegeben haben. Diese Namen bedeuten viel mehr, als die heutigen Menschen ahnen, und als irgendwie die heutige Medizin aus ihrem abstrakten Denken heraus gewinnen kann, wenn sie auch experimentiert, seziert und so weiter. All die Dinge, die Realitäten sind, die uns wieder durchschauen lassen die Welt, müssen wir ja erst wiederum aufnehmen. Das aber ist die Aufgabe geisteswissenschaftlicher Vertiefung, daß wir wiederum zu Wirklichkeiten, zu Realitäten kommen.
[ 11 ] In diesen vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraum, in dem die Menschen gewissermaßen das durchmachten, was physische Selbsterkenntnis war, was ein Durchschauen des Menschlich-Leiblichen war, gerade in diese Zest — annähernd ins erste Drittel hinein - fällt das größte Ereignis der Erdenentwickelung, das Mysterium von Golgatha. Wie ist die Zeit beschaffen, in die das Mysterium von Golgatha hineinfällt? Je weiter wir zurückgehen, desto mehr finden wir in den alten Zeiten, in der griechischen Zeit, in der ägyptisch-chaldäischen, in der persischen, in der altindischen Zeit, ein solch unmittelbares Erkennen der ganzen menschlichen Wesenheit. Dieses Erkennen der ganzen menschlichen Wesenheit verschwindet dann. Die letzten Reste davon sind vorhanden in der Zeit, als das Mysterium von Golgatha eintrat. Es war noch etwas von instinktivem, altem Menschheitserkennen da. Zum Beispiel diejenigen Persönlichkeiten, die uns beschrieben werden in den Evangelien als die Apostel oder als die Jünger des Herrn, hatten noch etwas von alten Erkenntnissen, aber durchaus instinktiv, nicht klar in ihren Seelen lebend. Auch andere hatten noch solche Erkenntnisse. Es waren solche Erkenntnisse in jener Zeit vielfach in der Dekadenz, aber sie waren noch da. Sie waren absterbend, verglimmend, aber es war doch noch so viel geblieben für jene Zeiten von den alten Erkenntnissen, daß eine große Anzahl von Menschen noch nach diesen alten Erkenntnissen das Mysterium von Golgatha begreifen konnte; namentlich als hineingestellt wurde in die Zeitentwickelung der durch göttliche Mächte eingeweihte Apostel Paulus, der ja selber ansichtig wurde der geistigen Welt. Durch alles das wurden die Zeitbedingungen geschaffen, aus denen heraus das Mysterium von Golgatha noch in einer gewissen ursprünglichen, instinktiven Weise begriffen werden konnte. Viele Menschen waren schon in einer späteren Entwickelungsphase drinnen. Namentlich die gebildeten Griechen und die gebildeten Römer hatten schon viel zu abstrakte Begriffe, um das Mysterium von Golgatha wirklich zu begreifen. Aber gewisse Menschen hatten sich die letzten Reste alter, hellsichtiger Erkenntnis und namentlich hellsichtiger Traditionen erhalten, und die begriffen noch, daß da wirklich eine außerirdische Macht, der Christus, sich verbunden hat mit einem irdischen Menschen, dem Jesus von Nazareth. Das Jahr 333 war gewissermaßen das Jahr, in dem die letzten Nachzügler derjenigen da waren, die innerhalb Europas das Mysterium von Golgatha wirklich verstanden; aber nicht verstanden etwa mit unserer anthroposophischen Geisteswissenschaft — die war natürlich dazumal noch nicht da -, sondern mit den Resten der alten Erkenntnis, desjenigen, was von der Gnosis zurückgeblieben war und dergleichen. Es war noch eine gewisse Geist-Erkenntnis da. Uraltes, menschliches Erbgut lebte in den menschlichen Seelen. Mit dem konnten sie das Mysterium von Golgatha begreifen.
[ 12 ] Was ist geblieben von diesem Mysterium von Golgatha? Verstandesmäßige Traditionen. Alte Gnosis wurde zur Theologie, zum bloß logischen Begreifen des Göttlichen. 'Theo-Logie; bloßes logisches Begreifen, nicht mehr Anschauen des Göttlichen.
[ 13 ] Und immer mehr und mehr kam seit dem Jahre 333 in die Dekadenz das unmittelbare Anschauen des Mysteriums von Golgatha, bis das verhängnisvolle 9. Jahrhundert eintrat, wo auf dem achten allgemeinen ökumenischen Konzil zu Konstantinopel im Jahre 869 das Dogma erlassen wurde, der Mensch bestünde nicht aus Leib, Seele und Geist, sondern es sei Pflicht des Christen anzuerkennen, daß der Mensch nur aus Leib und Seele bestehe, und die Seele einige geistige Eigenschaften habe. Dazumal wurde die Trichotomie, wie man es nannte — die einzig und allein mögliche Menschenerkenntnis, daß der Mensch aus Leib, Seele und Geist bestehe — dogmatisch abgeschafft, und es wurde befohlen, als rechtgläubig anzuerkennen das Dogma, daß der Mensch nur aus Leib und Seele bestehe. Die modernen Philosophen geben vielfach vor, sie gingen von einer voraussetzungslosen Erkenntnis aus, und sie reden von dem Leib auf der einen Seite, von der Seele auf der anderen Seite. Sie reden vom Geiste höchstens in einer sehr phrasenhaften Weise, denn sie kennen ihn ja nicht. Sie würden ihn erst erkennen, wenn sie anthroposophische Geisteswissenschaft anerkennen würden. Diese «voraussetzungslose Philosophie», die heute vielfach gelehrt wird, was ist sie denn? Sie ist das Ergebnis des Dogma vom achten ökumenischen Konzil im Jahre 869. Und während die großen Philosophen unserer Zeit deklamieren, daß sie voraussetzungslose Wissenschaft treiben, prägen sie eigentlich nichts anderes als in neuere Formen dasjenige, was das achte ökumenische Konzil der Christenheit als Dogma vorgeschrieben hat.
[ 14 ] Das muß man durchschauen. Man muß sich völlig klar sein darüber, daß schon die Hinweisung auf den Geist innerhalb des Entstehens der modernen Zivilisation noch in der zweiten Hälfte des vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraumes als gefährlich angesehen worden ist. Wir stehen heute vor der Verpflichtung, wiederum die Menschheit hinzuweisen auf den Geist, der durch eine lange Zeit der europäischen Zivilisation geradezu für den Teufel erklärt worden ist. Und geblieben sind nach dem Jahre 333 im Grunde genommen nur Traditionen der alten christologischen Erkenntnis. Traditionen!
[ 15 ] Für dasjenige, was künstlerisch ist, sieht man leichter ein, wie es Tradition geblieben ist. Sehen Sie sich zum Beispiel noch an die Bilder von Cimabue, da werden Sie sehen, daß da eine Welt lebte, die sogleich, indem sie bei Giotto auftaucht, eine andere wird. In Cimabue lebt noch etwas, wie es in Dante zum Beispiel auch noch lebte, was die späteren Menschen gar nicht mehr erleben. Aber dieses Drinnenstehen in der geistigen Welt, was bei Cimabue noch vorhanden war, hörte später auf. Später ist es eine Verlogenheit, wenn man einen Goldhintergrund macht. Für Cimabue war das noch eine Selbstverständlichkeit. Und sehen Sie sich die russische Ikone an, das ist nicht irgend etwas, was nach einem Modell gemacht wird, sondern das ist etwas, wo noch alte Traditionen leben; Traditionen von einem Hellsehen, das zur Zeit des Mysteriums von Golgatha noch vorhanden war und der Menschheit das Mysterium von Golgatha verständlich machte. Dann kamen die Zeiten, in denen durch äußere Machtmittel die Traditionen aufrechterhalten wurden. Und dann kam die Zeit des 19. Jahrhunderts, wo die gewöhnliche Seelenregsamkeit, die so große, bedeutsame Früchte in Naturwissenschaft und Technik gebracht hat, auch auf die Theologie angewendet wurde. Was ist aber in der Theologie daraus geworden? Aus dem Christus Jesus, aus der Verkörperung einer außerirdischen Wesenheit wurde «der schlichte Mann aus Nazareth»; zwar der vorzüglichste Mensch, aber eben nicht der Träger einer überirdischen Wesenheit. Naturalismus wurde die Theologie. Je menschlicher die modernen Theologen den Jesus von Nazareth auffassen, je weniger sie Christologie zu treiben veranlaßt sind, desto mehr lieben sie das. Sie möchten sich auch in der Theologie nur erheben bis zu der Beschreibung des Menschen Jesus von Nazareth, nicht bis zum Erfassen des Christus als einer überirdischen Wesenheit, die gewohnt hat in dem Menschen Jesus von Nazareth.
[ 16 ] Wer heute in die Weltenereignisse vom Geiste aus etwas eingeweiht ist, muß manches anders sehen, als die Menschen es nach äußerlichen Beurteilungen sehen. Jenes Mitteleuropa, das solch tragisches Schicksal heute erlebt, hat ja auch unter manchem anderen, was zu besprechen nicht hierher gehört, es ausgehalten, einen Adolf Harnack als einen großen Gelehrten anzusehen; jenen Menschen, der es zuwege gebracht hat, zu sagen, der Sohn gehöre nicht in das Evangelium, sondern nur der Vater, und das Evangelium solle man so verstehen, daß man nur von dem Menschen Jesus von Nazareth spreche und von dem, was dieser Mensch gelehrt habe über den Vatergott. Abgesetzt sollte werden durch die Harnacksche Theologie das Aufblicken zu der Geistigkeit des Christus. Harnacksche "Theologie in Mitteleuropa bedeutete in Wahrheit Abschwören des Christentums, Verleugnen des Christentums, bedeutete das Aufrichten derjenigen Weltanschauung, die ausdrücklich erklärt: Wir wollen nichts mehr wissen von der Geistigkeit des Christus. Das ist das Bedeutsame, welches gekommen ist über die neuere Menschheit, daß über die lebenswichtigsten Begriffe die verkehrtesten Anschauungen da sind.
[ 17 ] Und so weiß die Menschheit heute, was Schlafen ist vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen, aber sie ist gewöhnlich nicht aufmerksam, was das andere Schlafen ist vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen, wenn wir im Alltag herumgehen und über die wichtigsten Dinge uns Illusionen, Träumen hingeben. Die neuere Menschheit schläft nicht nur, wenn sie in der Nacht im Bette liegt — das ist sogar noch das bessere Schlafen -, die neuere Menschheit schläft im Gebiete ihres Egoismus, wenn sie sich einsperrt in ihr Inneres, wenn sie den menschlichen Leib nicht kennenlernt, wenn sie aber auch nicht zu geistiger Selbsterkenntnis vorschreiten will. Es ist eine andere Art des Schlafens als in der Zeit, die zugebracht wird vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen. Um das zu verstehen, müssen wir allerdings einmal hinschauen auf die Natur des Einschlafens und des Schlafens vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen. Was geschieht denn da eigentlich mit dem Menschen? Warum ist es so für die Anschauung des modernen Menschenverstandes, als ob Schlafen in der Seelenverfassung für den jetzigen Menschen dasselbe wäre wie für den alten Griechen? Der Grieche wachte nicht so, der Ägypter erst recht nicht, wie der heutige Mensch wacht, und er schlief auch nicht so. Wir müssen für jedes Zeitalter gerade diese Seelenverfassung im besonderen kennenlernen. Wenn des Menschen Seele, also Ich und Astralleib sich loslösen im Schlafe vom physischen Leib und Ätherleib, die dann im Bette liegen bleiben, wo ist die Seele, also Ich und Astralleib, dann in der Schlafenszeit?
[ 18 ] Mit solch äußeren Beschreibungen, daß da eine Wolke sich äußerlich erhebt über dem physischen Leibe — was ja durchaus für die äußerliche, für die ganz äußerliche Hellsichtigkeit eine Tatsache ist -, ist es aber nicht getan. Man muß auf das Innere sehen. Man muß auf das sehen, was die Seele wirklich zwischen dem Einschlafen und Aufwachen erlebt. Beim heutigen Menschen erlebt die Seele zwischen dem Einschlafen und Aufwachen diejenigen Erlebnisse, welche wiederum durchlebt werden von den noch nicht auf der Erde verkörperten Seelen. Also nehmen wir ein Ereignis, das gerade jetzt, in diesem Augenblick, bevor ich mit dem Vortrage angefangen habe, an mich herangetreten ist: Einem Anthroposophen ist ein Töchterchen geboren worden. Es war vor einem Jahr in der geistigen Welt und hat seit dem Jahr den Versuch gemacht, herunterzusteigen in die physische Welt. Es war also in der geistigen Welt die ganzen früheren Jahrzehnte, die wir schon älter sind als dieses Mädchen, das geboren worden ist. Während wir nun jeweils geschlafen haben, lebten wir tatsächlich vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen auch in der Welt, diedieses Mädchen vor der Empfängnis beziehungsweise vor der Geburt durchlebt hat. Das ist auch unsere Welt. Die noch nicht verkörperten Seelen erleben etwas; mit denen leben wir im fünften nachatlantischen Zeitalter beim Schlafen zusammen und in allen Ereignissen, die ähnlich sind denjenigen, die solche Seelen in der geistigen Welt erleben. — Dagegen leben wir mit demjenigen, was wir beim Wachen verschlafen, vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen, in den Erbschaften des alten irdischen Lebens. Was zurückgeblieben ist vom Indertum, vom Persertum, vom Ägyptertum, was aber auf der Erde erlebt worden ist geistig, mit dem leben wir ganz zusammengekrampft egoistisch in unserem Inneren, weil wir es ja in unsere Inkarnation hereintragen. Mit dem leben wir bei Tage, die Gegenwart verschlafend — denn die hat sehr viele geistig erfaßbare Ereignisse —, aber uns zusammenkrampfend mit den Vorstellungen, die wir von früher haben, die wir sogar in unserer Sprache hartnäckig festhalten, denn die Sprache enthält vielfach für uns kristallisiertes altes Weisheitsgut. Wir opponieren dagegen, dieses alte Weisheitsgut irgendwie auf unsere Seelen wirken zu lassen. Wir reden heute zum Beispiel vom Messer und von der Schere, und wir bedenken meistens nicht, wenn wir das Schneiden der Schere ins Auge fassen, daß da dem Wort das Scheren zugrunde liegt, das Sie hier an jedem Coiffeurladen angeschrieben finden. Und beim Messer, da liegt eine moralische Vorstellung zugrunde; das hängt mit dem Maß zusammen, mit dem Zumessen. Das Messer war dasjenige, womit man dem anderen die Gabe zugeschnitten, zugemessen hatte. Die Dinge, die in den Worten kristallisiert sind, die sind altes Geistesleben. Die Worte gebrauchen wir heute gedankenlos, die Dinge aber ruhen in den Tiefen unseres Wesens. Wenn die Sprache sich aus uns entringt, dann ist es so, daß wir da miterleben alte Erdenzeiten. Vom Aufwachen bis zum Einschlafen erleben wir geistig alte Erdenzeiten, auch schlafend; und vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen erleben wir diejenigen Ereignisse, die zum Herabsteigen der Seelen ins irdische Leben weisen.
[ 19 ] Sehen Sie, das sind Realitäten, das sind Wirklichkeiten. Diese Wirklichkeiten muß sich eine neuere Menschheit wohl einprägen, wenn sie nicht durchaus nur mit den Niedergangskräften sich bekanntmachen will, sondern auch mit den Aufgangskräften. Es wäre viel besser, wenn eine größere Anzahl von Menschen des Abends vor dem Einschlafen etwas anderes machen würde, als was heute die Menschen machen. Denken Sie nur einmal, was das Letzte bei vielen Menschen ist, wenn sie abends schlafen gehen. Für die heutige Menschheit wäre es richtig zu sagen: Ich möchte hineingehen in diejenige Welt, in der Aufgangskräfte sind, in der die Kräfte erlebt werden, welche die Seelen hier in die irdische Welt herunterführen; in der diese Kräfte geistig erlebt werden. Zukunftskräfte erlebt der Mensch heute zwischen Einschlafen und Aufwachen. Und er sollte daher eine gewisse Begierde entwickeln nach denjenigen Lehren, die von der geistigen Welt reden, die ein Bewußtsein darüber entwickeln, was durchlebt wird von den Seelen, wenn sie in einem ähnlichen Zustande sind, aber bewußt, wie die Seelen sonst zwischen Einschlafen und Aufwachen. Da heraus, aus dieser Welt muß kommen dasjenige, was die großen Impulse gibt, um die Zivilisation weiterzubringen, um die Zivilisation wiederum zu heilen. Da heraus müssen die geistigen, die staatlichen und auch die sozial-wirtschaftlichen Impulse kommen, welche als Heilkräfte unserer Zivilisation sich entfalten müssen. Denn in unserer Zeit müssen wir wieder gewinnen die Möglichkeit, das Mysterium von Golgatha spirituell-geistig aufzufassen.
[ 20 ] Sehen Sie, was ist denn das Wesentliche - oder sagen wir ein Wesentliches, denn es gibt ja natürlich unzählig viel Wesentliches - im Mysterium von Golgatha? Ein Gott, eine überirdische Wesenheit ist heruntergestiegen, hat Wohnung genommen im Jesus von Nazareth. Eine Eigenschaft solcher Wesenheiten ist die, daß sie nicht sterben können. Alle diejenigen Wesenheiten, die Sie beschrieben finden in meiner «Geheimwissenschaft im Umriß» als die Wesenheiten der höheren Hierarchien, der Angeloi, Archangeloi und so weiter bis hinauf zu den höchsten, den Seraphinen und Cherubinen und so weiter, sie sterben nicht in demselben Sinn; Sie können das nachlesen, wie ihr Lebensschicksal ist; sie sterben nicht in einer solchen Weise, wie die Menschen sterben. Was hat der Christus, der aus diesen höheren Hierarchien hervorgegangen ist, auf sich genommen? Er stirbt in einem Menschenleibe. Das, sehen Sie, ist sein bedeutungsvollster Übergang zur Wirksamkeit innerhalb der Erdenmenschheit. Er starb in einem Menschenleibe. Er hat dasjenige Erlebnis des Sterbens durchgemacht, das andere Götter, die mit der Erde verbunden sind, nicht durchmachen. Das hat man noch einigermaßen verstanden bis zum Jahre 333, das müssen wir wieder lernen zu verstehen. Wir müssen wieder lernen zu verstehen, daß in der Tat eine außerirdische Wesenheit das Erlebnis des Sterbens mitgemacht hat und dadurch aufgegangen ist in der Erdenentwickelung, mit uns lebt in der Erdenentwickelung. Aber wir müssen die große Bescheidenheit entwickeln, zu erkennen, daß ja diese Wesenheit natürlich weit über dem, was menschliche Seelenverfassung erleben kann, steht. Diese Wesenheit ist herabgestiegen aus Welten, wo nicht gestorben wird. Wer sind die dienenden Wesen für diese Christus-Wesenheit? Es sind nicht alle zu demselben Opfer gekommen; es sind nicht alle auf die Erde herabgestiegen und gestorben. Wesenheiten, angefangen von der Hierarchie der Angeloi bis hinauf in die höheren Hierarchien dienen dem Christus, der sich mit der Erdenentwickelung vereinigt hat. Aber wir entdecken sie nicht, wenn wir uns nicht aufschwingen zur überirdischen Erkenntnis der höheren Hierarchien. Dasjenige, was zu dem Christus führt, muß aus der Erkenntnis geistiger Welten gesucht werden. Wir brauchen zuerst Geisteswissenschaft, damit wir zur Christus-Erkenntnis wiederum kommen können. Denn der Christus ist auf der Erde, aber das, was ihn umgibt, das ist in der Welt der höheren Hierarchien. Und es war die große Versuchung der Menschheit in der neueren Zeit, daß sie die neuere Naturwissenschaft mit ihren großen Triumphen durchmachte, daß sie die Anerkenntnis der bloßen äußeren Naturkräfte in sich aufgenommen hat. Aber hinter all diesen Naturkräften leben die geistigen Wesenheiten. Das ist schon richtig, was die neuere Naturwissenschaft sagt, aber hinter diesen Naturkräften leben lenkend und leitend die geistigen Wesenheiten, die dienen dem Christus. Der Christus ist in alledem, was Erdenentwickelung ist. Überirdische Wesen dienen ihm, aber überirdische Wesen werden nur durch Geisteswissenschaft erkannt. Deshalb hat auch Geisteswissenschaft gegenüber der Erneuerung des Christentums eine unbegrenzt bedeutsame Aufgabe. Sie sehen daraus, daß wir heute diese Geisteswissenschaft nicht so betreiben können, daß wir sie nur als persönliche Angelegenheit betrachten. Diese Geisteswissenschaft ist heute eine Angelegenheit der ganzen zivilisierten Menschheit. Und deshalb war es durchaus eine innere Notwendigkeit, daß von Anfang an innerhalb des Kreises, der dann den Namen «Anthroposophische Gesellschaft» erhalten hat, die Geisteswissenschaft in einer anderen Weise getrieben worden ist, als etwa in der Theosophischen Gesellschaft. Die Theosophische Gesellschaft hatte von Anfang an in ihrer ganzen Konstitution etwas Sektiererisches, etwas was rechnete mit dem Egoismus der neueren Zeit. Der Anthroposophie war die Aufgabe zugefallen, mit dem modernen Bewußtsein zu rechnen; mit demjenigen zu rechnen, was sonst äußere Kultur der Menschheit ist, und da hineinzutragen die Ergebnisse des geistigen Anschauens. Alle kleineren Streitigkeiten und Katzbalgereien kommen demgegenüber gar nicht in Betracht. Das Wesentliche war, daß von mir rein erhalten werden mußte jene geistige Bewegung, die mit der gesamten modernen Wissenschaft rechnet. Dabei kommt es mir nicht darauf an, ob der eine oder der andere dieses oder jenes anerkennt. Möge die ganze Welt heute noch schimpfen, möge die ganze Welt nur in negativer Weise kritisieren, darauf kommt es nicht an, sondern darauf kommt es an, daß in Wirklichkeit dasjenige, was von mir als Geisteswissenschaft vertreten wird, in vollem Einklange steht mit der modernen wissenschaftlichen Gesinnung und dem modernen moralischen Gewissen. — Ich mußte vorangehen lassen die «Philosophie der Freiheit», die Verkündigung des Karma. Ich habe es oftmals mit tiefem Herzeleid in dem Kreise der Theosophen hören müssen, daß sie gesagt haben: Wenn den oder jenen ein Leid trifft, oder wenn der oder jener sozial ein geplagtes Wesen einer niedrigeren Klasse oder Kaste ist, so ist das eben in seinem Karma, das hat er eben so verdient. — Das war eine Ausdeutung der Karmaidee, wie die egoistischen Menschen des 19. oder 20. Jahrhunderts sie brauchten. Diese Menschen bedachten nicht, daß wir ja nicht nur in diesem gegenwärtigen Erdenleben leben, sondern daß wir auch in künftigen leben werden. Und wir haben heute nicht immer zurückzuschauen auf dasjenige, was wir in vergangenen Erdenleben hatten, sondern wir haben auch zu bedenken, daß wir in kommenden Erdenleben auf das als etwas erstes zurückzublicken haben werden, was wir jetzt erleben. Freiheit ist mit der Karmaidee in vollem Einklange, nur daß alles dasjenige, was im Kontobuch des Lebens auftritt, in einem karmischen Zusammenhang steht.
[ 21 ] Wenn ich das Lebensschicksal seinen Aktiva und Passiva nach addiere, und nachher die Differenz bilde, so bekomme ich eine Lebensbilanz, aber deshalb sind die einzelnen Zahlen nicht einer Naturnotwendigkeit unterworfen, ebensowenig wie die einzelnen Zahlen des kaufmännischen Kontobuches vom Fleiße und dergleichen abhängen, und zuletzt sich doch mit Notwendigkeit eine Bilanz ergibt. So ist im Lebenskarma Freiheit absolut vereinbar mit der Karmaidee. Wir dürfen uns nicht der Bequemlichkeit eines Fatalismus hingeben, wenn wir die Karmaidee als etwas voll Berechtigtes hinstellen. Ebenso muß Geisteswissenschaft mit dem modernen Gewissen, mit der moralischen Gesinnung der modernen Menschheit in vollem Einklang stehen. Und deshalb trat auch in der Zeit, in welcher gewissermaßen die Katastrophe eintrat für alles dasjenige, was seelisch, geistig und physisch der Egoismus der modernen Menschheit verschuldet hat, die Notwendigkeitheran, in einem großen Umfange mit Geisteswissenschaft zu wirken.
[ 22 ] Wäre es denn ehrlich und redlich gewesen, immerzu zu predigen, Geisteswissenschaft sei da, um der Menschheit zu helfen, und dann keine sozialen Anschauungen zu haben in den Zeiten, in denen die sozialen Forderungen so dringend geworden sind wie heute? Soll die Menschenliebe nicht fortschreiten zu sozialer Erkenntnis? Sollen wir bloß bei dem phrasenhaften Deklamieren über Menschenliebe bleiben? Sollen wir nicht vielmehr fortschreiten zu realen sozialen Impulsen? Sehen Sie dieses Fortschreiten zu realen sozialen Impulsen als ein Ergebnis, als Grunderkenntnis der Geisteswissenschaft an, als ein Ergebnis desjenigen, was ich Ihnen heute über Wachen und Schlafen, über schlafendes Wachen und das Aufwecken des Schlafens durch die Geisteswissenschaft gesagt habe; sehen Sie es als ein Ergebnis derjenigen Erkenntnis an, die Ihnen sagt: die dienenden Geister des Christus, sie werden uns erst klar, wenn wir in die geistige Welt hinaufschauen, dadurch wird uns auch erst — durch Geisteswissenschaft — das Mysterium von Golgatha in einem der heutigen Menschheit entsprechenden Sinne wiederum klar; — sehen Sie es als ein Ergebnis alles dessen an, daß Geisteswissenschaft heute nicht innerhalb von irgendwelchen sektiererischen Logen oder Zweigen stehenbleiben darf, sondern daß wir sie hinaustragen müssen so gut wir können, jeder nach dem Maße, wie er an seinem Platze steht. In Dornach durfte nicht bloß eine sektiererische Stätte geschaffen werden, sondern es mußte eine solche Stätte geschaffen werden, wo alle Wissenschaften, das ganze tätige Leben, das soziale Leben, das künstlerische Leben befruchtet werden kann. Eine Angelegenheit der breiten Menschheitsmassen muß anthroposophisch orientierte Geisteswissenschaft werden, trotzdem wir ihr wichtigstes, dasjenige, was uns eigentlich dann so recht zu Herzen geht, was uns die Kräfte im Inneren aufleben läßt, eben in dem engeren Kreise unserer Zweige betreiben. Da sollen wir uns die Kräfte sammeln, um eine gewisse höhere Erkenntnis, die wir zuerst aufnehmen in diesen Zweigen, heranbilden zu können. Diese Erkenntnis muß aber herangebildet werden. Denn wir leben heute in einem Zeitalter, in dem die Menschen eigentlich nicht wissen, was sie wollen, weil sie das wichtigste im Leben verschlafen, in dem sie aber alle ein Wiedererkennen des Geistes wollen. Das müssen wir als die Pioniere, möchte ich sagen, der geistigen Erneuerung, als Anthroposophen, in unserem tiefsten Herzen fühlen.
[ 23 ] Deshalb wünsche ich auch so recht von Herzen, daß innerhalb der Zweige auch von Holland lebe ein solch ernstes, fleißiges und emsiges Studieren desjenigen, was aus geistigen Welten an Erkenntnissen gegeben werden kann in unserer Bewegung. Ich wünsche ein recht fleißiges Studieren innerhalb der Zweige. Aber ich wünsche, daß es nicht bleibe bei der Tätigkeit innerhalb der Zweige, daß dasjenige, was in den Zweigen getrieben wird, nur der Ausgangspunkt sein möge eines Heraustretens unter alle Menschen, eines jeden in seiner Weise, damit diejenigen Sehnsuchten, die heute in der ganzen Menschheit leben, gerade durch die anthroposophisch orientierte Geistesanschauung befriedigt werden können. Das ist es auch, warum wir verstehen sollten, worin diese Sehnsuchten der modernen Menschheit bestehen. Glauben wir nicht, materialistisch zu werden, indem wir die Materie durchgeistigen. Seien wir uns klar darüber, daß ein großes Unglück vor der Menschheit steht, wenn man es nicht in der rechten Weise erkennt, um es abzuwenden.
[ 24 ] Das achte ökumenische Konzil im Jahre 869 hat aus der Menschheit das Hinblicken auf den Geist ausgetrieben. Diejenigen, die so recht materialistisch gesinnt sind, möchten die nächste Etappe vorbereiten; sie möchten vorbereiten, auch die Seele abzuschaffen, und es zu einer allgemeinen dogmatischen Erkenntnis des modernen und zukünftigen Lebens machen, daß der Mensch überhaupt nur Leib sei. Und auf Mittel sinnen gewisse teuflische Eingeweihte, wie man — jetzt nicht durch seelische Einflüsse, sondern durch Ingredienzien, durch gewisse Säfte, die man der Natur entnimmt — materialistisch erziehen, materialistisch den Menschen überhaupt zubereiten könne als Leib. Mehr mit anderen Grundsätzen, als denjenigen der Waldorfschule — die spirituelle Proteste sind gegen den modernen Materialismus -, sinnen andere Menschen die experimentelle Psychologie aus, die heute allerlei Experimente macht, um die Fähigkeiten zu prüfen. Das ist nur die Vorstufe desjenigen, was man eigentlich will. Man will nicht mehr mit seelischen Mitteln das Kind erziehen, sondern mit äußerlich materiellen Mitteln, damit die Fähigkeiten in leiblicher Beziehung sich entwickeln. Wir kommen zur Automatisierung des Menschen, wenn wir uns nicht im rechten Zeitpunkt besinnen darauf, daß nicht der Weg gemacht werden darf, zu dem abgeschafften Geiste auch noch die Seele abzuschaffen, sondern daß der Weg umgekehrt gemacht werden muß, wie er seit dem achten ökumenischen Konzil gegangen worden ist; daß der Weg gemacht werden muß, den Geist wiederum zu finden, und das, was von ihm wiederum gefunden werden kann, in der Menschheit, in allen Zweigen des menschlichen, praktischen Lebens zu pflegen.
[ 25 ] Das möchte ich, nachdem wir uns wiederum nach längerer Zeit haben sehen dürfen, in Ihre lieben Seelen, in Ihre Herzen gelegt haben. Pflegen Sie Geisteswissenschaft erstens als eine Herzensangelegenheit, so wie sie der einzelne Mensch pflegen muß heute, um selber vorwärtszukommen. Pflegen Sie dann dasjenige, was Sie selber so in sich aufgenommen haben, indem Sie es in die Menschheit hineintragen auf allen Gebieten des Lebens. Dann werden Sie allmählich den Weg finden, um innerhalb der heutigen schweren, ernsten Prüfungszeit der Menschheit das Rechte, ein jeder an seinem Platze, zu tun.
Thirteenth Lecture
[ 1 ] The times we live in are so serious that it is not appropriate to think about personal circumstances at the moment. So please allow me to express my heartfelt thanks to your esteemed chairwoman for her kind words, and then move straight on to what I believe I have to say to you, now that we have not seen each other here in Holland for such a long time.
[ 2 ] The times in which we live are much more serious than most people today realize. Here we can discuss these times from the perspective gained through many years of studying anthroposophical spiritual science. We know that we are living in an epoch that began in the 15th century with its own particular characteristics. At that time, it slowly began to develop its peculiarities. And those who, as initiates into the spiritual conditions of human evolution, are able to survey this development, know that the second half of the 19th century represents a particular low point in human evolution within modern civilization, especially European civilization. And this low point, which we can characterize as the emergence of a special kind of egoism in all members of civilized humanity, an egoism that did not exist before, this wave of a special development then sent its terrible ramifications into the 20th century, and these ramifications are still holding humanity in their grip today.
[ 3 ] When I say that a wave of egoism has swept over the whole of modern civilization, I am not speaking in the trivial sense of what is commonly called egoism, but in the sense of egoism as we shall try to understand it a little better in the course of this morning's meditation, and as it is clear to those who are initiated into the actual secrets of the more recent development of humanity.
[ 4 ] We are familiar with the members of human nature. We know that for a long time the soul members of human nature have been undergoing a special transformation, a special development. We know that when we go back to the ancient times of human development, we then have to deal with a special formation of the human etheric body within an ancient Indian development, but that then a special formation of the astral body begins, and that a certain middle development took place during that period of European development, which began around 747 BC in southern Europe and came to an end in the first third of the 15th century. At that time, the epoch of human development began in which we still find ourselves today. 747 BC, before the Mystery of Golgotha, marks the beginning of that phase of human development in which the so-called intellectual or emotional soul unfolded. And everything that humanity still values today as Greek culture developed because it was precisely during this period that the intellectual or emotional soul was at its highest stage of development. However, while the wonderful Greek culture was developing, what we call the intellectual or emotional soul was in an ascending phase of development. It had not yet reached its peak. For such peaks are always, in a certain sense, times of trial for human development. The Greeks had to go through the youthful freshness, so to speak, of the intellectual or emotional soul in order to develop. And out of this youthful freshness of an intellect not yet permeated by egoism, out of this youthful freshness of the human mind, arose the Greek civilization so admired by posterity. Latin culture, Roman culture, then took over something of this intellectual soul character, which was in a descending, decadent phase of development. Anyone who has a deeper understanding of what lived in Roman culture knows that the intellect was already reaching its culmination there. The intellect rose to a high point. That is why the Romans developed such abstract concepts, developed something that did not yet exist in the entire ancient Orient, something that did not exist in the sense we know it in Europe, not even in Greek culture: the Romans developed legal concepts, juridical concepts. Today, we view the world in an extremely external way; and we view what we think about jus, about law, which actually comes from the Roman intellectual soul, as something that already existed in the ancient Orient, for example with Hammurabi and the like. But that is not the case. Both the Decalogue, the Ten Commandments, and what is found in other documents from that time were, in essence, something completely different from what our modern legal concepts are. They are something abstract, something that is no longer very close to the human soul. And everything that is intellectual development in this sense reached its peak within European civilization in an age that is actually little studied in terms of external history, but which is extremely important and significant for those who want to consider human development in a spiritual sense.
[ 5 ] The significant year that can be pointed to as particularly important for European development is the year 333 after the Mystery of Golgotha. 333 after the Mystery of Golgotha is the middle of the fourth post-Atlantean epoch. It is the point in time when a fluctuating worldview and a fluctuating view of humanity existed simultaneously in Europe. There was nothing of the penetrating world knowledge that the Greeks still had; there was also nothing of a proper grasp of the inner life, but instead a vacillation of human beings, now toward a longing for great world knowledge, now toward a longing for self-knowledge, for self-awareness. The human soul of the European peoples went through a great deal during this fourth post-Atlantean period. Roman civilization was then preparing for its downfall. It left behind only its language, its valuable cultural heritage, so to speak, to the European people. And so humanity lived through the second half of this fourth post-Atlantean period until the 15th century, when our own period began.
[ 6 ] We have inherited from the previous period, in which most of us went through one or more earthly lives, in some way—partly through physical inheritance, but mainly because we were the souls that had previously incarnated—we carried the legacy of this fourth post-Atlantean period into our fifth post-Atlantean period and took up this legacy. This legacy of the fourth post-Atlantean period lives on in everything that constitutes our civilization today.
[ 7 ] We have incorporated thinking into the consciousness soul. This means a great deal. The consciousness soul, which brings human beings to the actual penetration, to the actual understanding of their ego, first took possession of thinking, of the life of imagination, of the intellect at the beginning of this fifth period. Humanity has become intelligent and clever, but clever within the consciousness soul. In human evolution, this is the development of egoism to its finest refinement. We must not merely condemn this age of egoism, we must not merely criticize it, but we must recognize this age of egoism, despite all the temptations it brings, despite all the great spiritual and external dangers it brings to human beings, as the age in which the consciousness of the self appears in its particular sharpness. This makes it possible for people to develop a true sense of freedom within themselves. None of us had this sense of freedom in our previous incarnations, in earlier epochs of human development. We had to go through egoism, which presents so many temptations, in order to arrive at the longing for freedom that only modern humanity has. And it is one of the most important anthroposophical insights that we know: we had to take something in order to transcend an important stage of human development, the stage of the development of freedom. But precisely for this reason, we must be aware that this transition is associated with many temptations and dangers for humanity, both in a spiritual and physical sense. And anthroposophically oriented knowledge must enable us to fully embrace the feeling of freedom, but at the same time to refine it, to permeate it with a spiritual understanding of the world which, despite the mature sense of self and mature self-consciousness that exist, nevertheless leads humanity to solve tasks that are not merely tasks of egoism, but tasks of the entire development of humanity, indeed of the entire development of the earth, of the entire development of the world.
[ 8 ] In this respect, we are today at a great turning point in the whole of modern civilization. A time of trials is upon us. Great tasks lie before humanity. But recognizing these tasks is extremely difficult, and it is made even more difficult by the fact that we have just passed through an age of great egoism.
[ 9 ] We sleep from the moment we fall asleep until we wake up. That is correct. We are in a state of reduced consciousness. Most of you probably know sleep from the negative way it announces itself, namely through the reduction of consciousness. But people do not judge the time of wakefulness in the same way. This time of wakefulness, the time from waking up to falling asleep, was actually different in the fourth post-Atlantean period. People today believe that they are awake in the same way that people were awake, say, at the time of the Mystery of Golgotha. That is not the case. The whole state of the soul was different. People were awake differently then. They had a much stronger awareness of their bodies. You see, today's human beings know very little about physical processes. The Greeks, not the Greeks of later times, but the Greeks of the pre-Socratic or pre-Platonic period, knew an extraordinary amount about the processes of their own bodies. The truly educated Greek, for example, looked up at the sun. He received light from the sun. This gave him the feeling that he was absorbing something ethereal, that he himself was receiving the light within himself. And when he thought, he said: The light, the sun thinks within me. For the Greeks of the pre-Socratic period, this was still a real feeling. They did not think about thinking in such an abstract way as we do today. They thought: The sun thinks in me; it allows me to absorb its light; the light that shines on things out there, that makes things visible out there, works in me by reflecting itself back into itself, so to speak, in such a way that thoughts spring up in me. The thoughts that were within them were sunlight to the Greeks. At the same time, they were for him what lived within him thanks to the influence of divine spiritual beings in the macrocosm. At the same time, they were for him what actually lifted him above his ordinary human dignity toward the divine. Man felt himself lifted above the earthly when he experienced the sunlight within himself as thinking. And when the particularly educated Greek ate, he regarded the food with which he took in what the sun does not give directly, but what comes from the earth, as a necessity of life, but at the same time he felt transformed into the food that became himself through his mouth, his esophagus, and the rest of his digestive organs. He felt himself to be one with this food, just as he felt himself to be one with the sunlight. And he felt the heaviness of the earth as he digested. He felt himself, in a sense, like the snake, which he did not yet hold in high esteem but observed with some shyness, which writhes out of the earth but which, when it has eaten, carries out digestion in a very visible manner. This is how the Greek felt what was going on inside his body, whether it was what he perceived as the bright sunlight thinking within him, or whether it was what chained him to the earthly realm, the act of eating. Through the intimate connection of the mind with their own bodies, they felt what also lived in them as physical human beings in a particularly energetic way. You can also see this from the following.
[ 10 ] When we paint people today in the usual way, as numerous painters have done year after year, decade after decade within the present generation, we are actually lying. We look at people from the outside and believe that we are producing something from what we experience. But it is not true that we can experience this. We could only experience it if we could conjure up within ourselves the way in which human beings felt their way through the whole of nature, as was the case with the Greeks. We must first learn this again in a completely different way than the Greeks did. Since the middle of the 15th century, we have attained such an abstract, theoretical state of mind that we no longer truly live through our bodies, but live in ideas that are inconceivable because we have conquered thinking for the ego, for the I. We must be aware of this. And we must become aware that we must in turn take in spirituality from anthroposophically oriented spiritual science so that egoity can be filled with something, so that what is really within us, what the Greeks experienced directly and elementarily, but which could not endure, can come into our lives again, now in a different way. For when the Greek departed, he departed with a natural necessity, similar to the flash of lightning through the clouds, similar to the rolling of thunder. He knew nothing of freedom. He knew the human being. He knew even more about the human being than we think today. For example, they still knew words that clearly show that humans knew something about the connection between the spiritual-soul and the physical-bodily. The Greek words, or those words that have remained from the Greeks, are still much more meaningful today than those that come from our therapeutic or pathological view, which no longer recognizes anything. Hypochondria, for example, is cartilage in the lower abdomen. This is something that the Greeks, out of their full understanding of how cartilage in a certain part of the body is created by the soul-spiritual in people who are hypochondriac, gave as a name. These names mean much more than people today suspect, and than modern medicine can somehow gain from its abstract thinking, even if it experiments, dissects, and so on. All the things that are realities, that allow us to see through the world again, we must first take in again. But it is the task of spiritual science to deepen our understanding so that we can come back to realities, to truths.
[ 11 ] In this fourth post-Atlantean period, in which human beings underwent, so to speak, what was physical self-knowledge, what was a seeing through of the human-physical, it is precisely in this third period — approximately in the first third — that the greatest event in the evolution of the earth takes place, the Mystery of Golgotha. What is the nature of the time in which the Mystery of Golgotha occurred? The further back we go, the more we find in ancient times, in Greek times, in Egyptian-Chaldean times, in Persian times, in ancient Indian times, such an immediate recognition of the whole human being. This recognition of the whole human being then disappears. The last remnants of it were still present at the time when the mystery of Golgotha occurred. There was still something of the instinctive, ancient human knowledge. For example, those personalities who are described to us in the Gospels as the apostles or disciples of the Lord still had something of the ancient knowledge, but it was entirely instinctive, not clearly alive in their souls. Others also still had such knowledge. Such knowledge was widespread in those times of decadence, but it was still there. They were dying, fading away, but there was still so much left of the old knowledge for those times that a large number of people were still able to understand the mystery of Golgotha according to this old knowledge; especially when the apostle Paul, who was initiated by divine powers and who himself saw the spiritual world, was placed in the time development. All this created the conditions of the time in which the mystery of Golgotha could still be understood in a certain original, instinctive way. Many people were already in a later phase of development. The educated Greeks and Romans in particular already had concepts that were too abstract to truly comprehend the mystery of Golgotha. But certain people had retained the last remnants of ancient clairvoyant knowledge and, in particular, clairvoyant traditions, and they still understood that an extraterrestrial power, the Christ, had truly connected with an earthly human being, Jesus of Nazareth. The year 333 was, in a sense, the year in which the last stragglers of those who truly understood the mystery of Golgotha within Europe were still alive; but they did not understand it in terms of our anthroposophical spiritual science — which of course did not yet exist at that time — but with the remnants of the old knowledge, of what had remained of Gnosticism and the like. There was still a certain spiritual knowledge. Ancient human heritage lived in human souls. With this, they were able to understand the mystery of Golgotha.
[ 12 ] What remains of this mystery of Golgotha? Intellectual traditions. Ancient Gnosticism became theology, a purely logical understanding of the divine. 'Theo-logy; mere logical understanding, no longer beholding the divine.
[ 13 ] And since the year 333, the direct perception of the mystery of Golgotha fell more and more into decadence until the fateful 9th century arrived, when, at the Eighth Ecumenical Council in Constantinople in 869, the dogma was decreed that man did not consist of body, soul, and spirit, but that it was the duty of Christians to acknowledge that man consisted only of body and soul, and that the soul had some spiritual qualities. At that time, the trichotomy, as it was called—the only possible understanding of man, that man consists of body, soul, and spirit—was dogmatically abolished, and it was commanded to recognize as orthodox the dogma that man consists only of body and soul. Modern philosophers often claim to start from unconditional knowledge, and they talk about the body on the one hand and the soul on the other. They talk about the spirit at most in a very vague way, because they do not know it. They would only recognize it if they acknowledged anthroposophical spiritual science. What is this “unconditional philosophy” that is widely taught today? It is the result of the dogma of the Eighth Ecumenical Council in 869. And while the great philosophers of our time proclaim that they are pursuing science without presuppositions, they are actually doing nothing more than molding into new forms what the Eighth Ecumenical Council of Christianity prescribed as dogma.
[ 14 ] This must be understood. It must be made absolutely clear that even in the second half of the fourth post-Atlantean epoch, any reference to the spirit within the emergence of modern civilization was considered dangerous. Today we are faced with the obligation to point out to humanity once again the spirit that has been declared the devil for a long time in European civilization. And after the year 333, basically only traditions of the old Christological knowledge remained. Traditions!
[ 15 ] It is easier to see how tradition has been preserved in art. Take, for example, the paintings of Cimabue. You will see that a world lived there which, as soon as it appeared in Giotto's work, became another. In Cimabue, something still lives that also lived in Dante, for example, but which later people no longer experience. But this standing within the spiritual world, which was still present in Cimabue, later ceased. Later, it is hypocritical to paint a gold background. For Cimabue, it was still a matter of course. And look at Russian icons; they are not just something made according to a model, but something in which old traditions still live on; traditions of clairvoyance that still existed at the time of the Mystery of Golgotha and made the Mystery of Golgotha understandable to humanity. Then came the times when traditions were upheld by external means of power. And then came the 19th century, when the ordinary soul activity that had brought such great and significant fruits in science and technology was also applied to theology. But what became of this in theology? Christ Jesus, the embodiment of an extraterrestrial being, became “the simple man from Nazareth”; certainly the most excellent human being, but not the bearer of a super-earthly being. Naturalism became theology. The more human modern theologians perceive Jesus of Nazareth, the less they are inclined to engage in Christology, and the more they love it. In theology, too, they want to rise only to the description of the man Jesus of Nazareth, not to the comprehension of Christ as a supernatural being who lived in the man Jesus of Nazareth.
[ 16 ] Anyone who is spiritually initiated into world events today must see many things differently from the way people see them based on external judgments. Central Europe, which is experiencing such a tragic fate today, has also endured, among other things that are not relevant to discuss here, to regard Adolf Harnack as a great scholar; that man who managed to say that the Son does not belong in the Gospel, but only the Father, and that the Gospel should be understood in such a way that one speaks only of the man Jesus of Nazareth and of what this man taught about God the Father. Harnack's theology was intended to remove people's gaze from the spirituality of Christ. Harnack's “theology in Central Europe” meant in reality a renunciation of Christianity, a denial of Christianity, and the establishment of a worldview that explicitly declared: We want nothing more to do with the spirituality of Christ. This is the significant thing that has come upon modern humanity, that the most vital concepts are subject to the most perverted views.
[ 17 ] And so humanity today knows what sleeping is, from falling asleep to waking up, but it is usually not aware of what the other sleep is, from waking up to falling asleep, when we go about our daily lives and indulge in illusions and dreams about the most important things. The modern human being does not only sleep when lying in bed at night—that is actually the better kind of sleep—the modern human being sleeps in the realm of his egoism when he locks himself inside himself, when he does not get to know the human body, but also when he does not want to progress toward spiritual self-knowledge. It is a different kind of sleep than the time spent between falling asleep and waking up. To understand this, however, we must first look at the nature of falling asleep and sleeping from the moment of falling asleep to the moment of waking up. What actually happens to human beings? Why does it seem to modern human understanding that sleeping is the same state of mind for people today as it was for the ancient Greeks? The Greeks did not wake up as we do today, and the Egyptians certainly did not, and they did not sleep in the same way either. We need to understand the particular state of mind of each age. When the human soul, that is, the I and the astral body, detach themselves from the physical body and etheric body during sleep, which then remain in bed, where are the soul, that is, the I and the astral body, during sleep?
[ 18 ] However, such external descriptions, that a cloud rises externally above the physical body — which is indeed a fact for external, for completely external clairvoyance — are not sufficient. One must look at the inner aspect. One must look at what the soul actually experiences between falling asleep and waking up. In modern human beings, the soul experiences between falling asleep and waking up those experiences which are in turn lived through by souls not yet incarnated on Earth. So let us take an event that came to me just now, at this moment, before I began my lecture: an anthroposophist has had a little daughter born. It was a year ago in the spiritual world and has been trying to descend into the physical world since then. So it was in the spiritual world for all the previous decades, which make us older than this girl who has been born. While we were asleep, we actually lived from the moment we fell asleep until we woke up in the world that this girl experienced before conception or before birth. That is also our world. The souls that are not yet embodied experience something; we live with them in the fifth post-Atlantean age while we sleep and in all events that are similar to those that such souls experience in the spiritual world. — In contrast, we live with what we sleep through while awake, from waking up to falling asleep, in the legacies of our old earthly life. What remains of the Indus, Persian, and Egyptian eras, but which has been experienced spiritually on Earth, we live with in a completely cramped, egoistic way within ourselves, because we carry it into our incarnation. We live with this during the day, sleeping through the present — for it has many spiritually comprehensible events — but cramped together with the ideas we have from earlier times, which we even stubbornly hold on to in our language, for language contains much old wisdom that has crystallized for us. We oppose allowing this old wisdom to have any effect on our souls. Today, for example, we talk about knives and scissors, and when we think about the cutting action of scissors, we usually do not consider that the word is based on the word “shear,” which you will find written on every barber shop sign. And in the case of knives, there is a moral concept underlying them; it has to do with measurement, with measuring out. The knife was the tool used to cut and measure out gifts for others. The things that are crystallized in words are ancient spiritual life. We use words today without thinking, but the things they refer to lie deep within our being. When language escapes us, we are witnessing ancient earthly times. From the moment we wake up to the moment we fall asleep, we experience old earthly times spiritually, even while sleeping; and from the moment we fall asleep to the moment we wake up, we experience those events that point to the descent of souls into earthly life.
[ 19 ] You see, these are realities, these are truths. A new humanity must impress these realities upon itself if it does not want to become acquainted only with the forces of decline, but also with the forces of ascent. It would be much better if a larger number of people did something different in the evening before going to sleep than what people do today. Just think about what the last thing is for many people when they go to sleep at night. It would be right for people today to say: I want to enter the world where forces of growth are at work, where the forces that bring souls down into the earthly world can be experienced, where these forces can be experienced spiritually. People today experience future forces between falling asleep and waking up. And they should therefore develop a certain desire for teachings that speak of the spiritual world, that develop an awareness of what souls experience when they are in a similar state, but conscious, as souls are otherwise between falling asleep and waking up. From this world must come that which gives the great impulses to advance civilization, to heal civilization once again. From this must come the spiritual, the state, and also the social and economic impulses which must unfold as the healing forces of our civilization. For in our time we must regain the ability to understand the mystery of Golgotha spiritually and spiritually.
[ 20 ] See, what is the essential thing—or let us say one essential thing, for there are of course countless essential things—in the mystery of Golgotha? A God, a super-earthly being, descended and took up residence in Jesus of Nazareth. One characteristic of such beings is that they cannot die. All those beings that you find described in my “Outline of Secret Science” as the beings of the higher hierarchies, the angeloi, archangeloi, and so on up to the highest, the seraphim and cherubim, and so on, do not die in the same sense; you can read about what their life destiny is; they do not die in the same way that human beings die. What did Christ, who came forth from these higher hierarchies, take upon himself? He died in a human body. You see, this is his most significant transition to activity within the human race on Earth. He died in a human body. He went through the experience of dying, which other gods connected with the Earth do not go through. This was still somewhat understood until the year 333, and we must learn to understand it again. We must learn again to understand that an extraterrestrial being did indeed undergo the experience of dying and thereby entered into earthly evolution, living with us in earthly evolution. But we must develop the great humility to recognize that this being is, of course, far above what human souls can experience. This being descended from worlds where there is no death. Who are the beings who serve this Christ being? Not all of them made the same sacrifice; not all of them descended to Earth and died. Beings ranging from the hierarchy of the angeloi up to the higher hierarchies serve Christ, who has united himself with the evolution of the earth. But we do not discover them unless we raise ourselves to the super-earthly knowledge of the higher hierarchies. That which leads to Christ must be sought in the knowledge of spiritual worlds. We first need spiritual science so that we can come to Christ consciousness again. For Christ is on Earth, but what surrounds him is in the world of the higher hierarchies. And it was the great temptation of humanity in recent times that it went through the new natural science with its great triumphs and accepted the recognition of mere external natural forces. But behind all these natural forces live spiritual beings. What modern natural science says is correct, but behind these natural forces live spiritual beings who serve Christ, guiding and directing them. Christ is in everything that is the evolution of the earth. Supernatural beings serve him, but supernatural beings can only be recognized through spiritual science. That is why spiritual science has an infinitely important task in the renewal of Christianity. You can see from this that we cannot practice spiritual science today by considering it merely a personal matter. Spiritual science today is a matter for the whole of civilized humanity. And that is why it was absolutely necessary from the beginning that spiritual science be pursued in a different way within the circle that later received the name “Anthroposophical Society” than it was, for example, in the Theosophical Society. From the beginning, the Theosophical Society had something sectarian about it, something that reckoned with the egoism of modern times. Anthroposophy had the task of reckoning with modern consciousness, with what otherwise constitutes the outer culture of humanity, and of bringing the results of spiritual perception into it. All minor disputes and squabbles are irrelevant in this context. The essential thing was that I had to keep pure the spiritual movement that reckons with the whole of modern science. It does not matter to me whether one person or another recognizes this or that. Let the whole world still rail today, let the whole world criticize in a negative way, that does not matter. What matters is that what I represent as spiritual science is in full harmony with the modern scientific attitude and the modern moral conscience. — I had to go ahead and publish The Philosophy of Freedom, the proclamation of karma. I have often had to listen with deep sorrow in my heart to theosophists saying that when this or that person suffers, or when this or that person is socially afflicted, belonging to a lower class or caste, it is simply their karma, they deserve it. That was an interpretation of the idea of karma as the selfish people of the 19th or 20th century needed it. These people did not consider that we do not only live in this present earthly life, but that we will also live in future ones. And today we do not always have to look back on what we had in past earthly lives, but we must also consider that in future earthly lives we will have to look back on what we are now experiencing as something that came first. Freedom is in complete harmony with the idea of karma, except that everything that appears in the account book of life is connected in a karmic way.
[ 21 ] If I add up the assets and liabilities of a life's destiny and then calculate the difference, I get a balance sheet of life, but that does not mean that the individual figures are subject to natural necessity, any more than the individual figures in a commercial account book depend on diligence and the like, and ultimately a balance sheet is produced as a matter of necessity. Thus, in the karma of life, freedom is absolutely compatible with the idea of karma. We must not indulge in the convenience of fatalism if we present the idea of karma as something fully justified. Likewise, spiritual science must be in complete harmony with the modern conscience, with the moral attitude of modern humanity. And that is why, at a time when catastrophe struck, so to speak, for everything that the egoism of modern humanity has caused spiritually, mentally, and physically, the necessity arose to work on a large scale with spiritual science.
[ 22 ] Would it have been honest and sincere to preach constantly that spiritual science is there to help humanity, and then have no social views at a time when social demands have become as urgent as they are today? Shouldn't love for humanity progress to social awareness? Should we just stick to rhetorical declarations about love for humanity? Should we not rather progress to real social impulses? Do you see this progression to real social impulses as a result, as a fundamental insight of spiritual science, as a result of what I have told you today about waking and sleeping, about sleeping waking and the awakening of sleep through spiritual science; do you see it as a result of the insight that tells you: the serving spirits of Christ only become clear to us when we look up into the spiritual world, and it is only then — through spiritual science — that the mystery of Golgotha becomes clear to us again in a sense appropriate to humanity today; — see it as a result of all this, that spiritual science today must not remain within any sectarian lodges or branches, but that we must carry it out as best we can, each according to his or her abilities. In Dornach, it was not enough to create a sectarian center; rather, a place had to be created where all sciences, all active life, social life, and artistic life could be enriched. Anthroposophically oriented spiritual science must become a matter for the broad masses of humanity, even though we pursue its most important aspect, that which really touches our hearts, that which revives our inner forces, in the narrower circle of our branches. There we must gather our forces in order to develop a certain higher knowledge, which we first take up in these branches. But this knowledge must be cultivated. For we live in an age in which people do not really know what they want because they are missing out on the most important thing in life, yet they all want to rediscover the spirit. As pioneers, I would say, of spiritual renewal, as anthroposophists, we must feel this in the depths of our hearts.
[ 23 ] That is why I also wish with all my heart that within the branches, including those in Holland, there will be serious, diligent, and industrious study of what insights can be gained from the spiritual worlds in our movement. I wish for diligent study within the branches. But I hope that it will not remain merely an activity within the branches, that what is done in the branches will only be the starting point for a movement among all people, each in their own way, so that the longings that exist in all of humanity today can be satisfied precisely through the anthroposophically oriented spiritual view. That is also why we should understand what these longings of modern humanity consist of. Let us not believe that we are becoming materialistic by spiritualizing matter. Let us be clear that a great misfortune lies ahead for humanity if we do not recognize it in the right way in order to avert it.
[ 24 ] The Eighth Ecumenical Council in 869 drove the gaze toward the spirit out of humanity. Those who are truly materialistic want to prepare the next stage; they want to prepare the way for abolishing the soul as well, and making it a general dogmatic belief of modern and future life that man is nothing but a body. And certain devilish initiates are devising means, not through spiritual influences, but through ingredients, through certain juices extracted from nature, by which they believe they can educate people in a materialistic way, prepare them as bodies for materialistic life. Based on principles other than those of the Waldorf School — whose spiritual protests are directed against modern materialism — other people are devising experimental psychology, which today conducts all kinds of experiments to test abilities. This is only the preliminary stage of what is actually wanted. People no longer want to educate children by spiritual means, but by external material means, so that their abilities develop in a physical relationship. We will end up with the automation of human beings if we do not realize in time that we must not go down the path of abolishing the soul as well as the spirit, but that the path must be reversed, as it has been since the Eighth Ecumenical Council; that the path must be taken to find the spirit again and to cultivate what can be found in it again in humanity, in all branches of human practical life.
[ 25 ] This is what I would like to place in your dear souls, in your hearts, after we have been able to see each other again after a long time. First of all, cultivate spiritual science as a matter of the heart, as each individual must do today in order to advance. Then cultivate what you have taken into yourselves by carrying it into humanity in all areas of life. Then you will gradually find the way to do what is right, each in their own place, within the difficult and serious time of trial that humanity is currently experiencing.