Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

Cosmosophy II
GA 208

23 October 1921, Dornach

Lecture III

To broaden the subject matter I have been presenting, let us start by looking back to a period of human evolution when the gaining of insight, as we know it today, was entirely different in character. We have spoken of this before, but a new light may be thrown on things that are already familiar because of the things that have been said in recent lectures.

Human perceptiveness has a completely different character today from the way it was in ancient Greek and Roman times. And the knowledge held in the Orient and in Africa before those times was of a completely different kind again than the insights that were so magnificently presented by the Greeks, made more abstract by the Romans and have in our day become more and more materialistic. At about the beginning of the 8th century BC the nature of human understanding became what essentially it still is today, though with modifications. Until now, we have more or less characterized the earlier way that went before it by saying: It was a kind of instinctive perception. Insight lived not in concepts but in images; these were not entirely like the dream images we see, yet they did not have the clear definition when they lived in human souls which they have in the modern world of concepts, but took more the form of images that passed through the conscious mind.

The contents were also different, relating more to the worlds in which human beings had their origin and in which they still lived, having separated only a little from them. During Saturn, Sun and Moon evolution, the human being was still wholly part of the rest of the world. And during earlier stages of Earth evolution, too, the human individual was not yet separate from the general content of the world but felt part of it. When people let go of the intellectual approach, where we use our brain to learn things, and do more or less as is done in certain oriental schools, where breathing processes are used to gain a kind of insight, a situation is created where the clean separation between self and world has disappeared. When people do yoga exercises, which belong to the past but can still be found today, they feel their individual nature to be reduced and subdued, so that they are like a breath in the world.

The nature of perceptiveness was like that in those earlier times, though people were also able to interpret their own inner physical body, in the way I spoke of yesterday, by using their image-based perception. Yesterday we considered how human beings take in the world around them today and retain it in ideas. This becomes an inner life out of which individuals are able to create an image of their world as it has been from birth to the present moment. The organs we have inside us—brain, lungs, liver—are content of the whole world. We can recall something we have experienced from memory and interpret its meaning, so that it lives in us as an idea. And in our internal organs we have the whole world inside us. Ancient wisdom consisted in interpreting the individual organs by relating them to the content of the whole world.

Essentially, the older kind of human understanding which existed until the 9th century BC was such that people gained insight into the content of the world by interpreting the internal physical and etheric nature of the human being. Of course, their view of those internal organs was different from that held by modern anatomists and physiologists. Every individual internal organ related to something in the outside world, yet the organ itself was experienced from inside. Thus the structure of the brain was seen in tremendous images and these in turn were related to the whole sphere of heaven, and people with this ancient way of understanding were able to gain an idea of the whole sphere of heaven, based on indications as to the structure of the brain gained through atavistic perception in images.

Essentially all the ancient wisdom about the world has come from such interpretations of the inner human being. It is not really possible, however, to say that the knowledge and understanding of those times was truly human by nature. True human understanding, which of course is not at all the dry, purely intellectual knowledge people often think it to be, is, after all, unthinkable without intelligence. The wisdom of old, however, was entirely without intelligence produced by human beings, and we cannot really call it “human” understanding. Human beings merely had part in the understanding which other entities had inside them. These were spirits belonging to the hierarchy of the Angels. An Angel would ensoul a human being and the old form of wisdom was really that of the Angel. The human individual merely had part in it by looking into the inner life of the Angel, as it were. This is also why people who had that ancient wisdom were rather vague as to how they got it. They simply said to themselves that it was something which was given to them, for it was the Angel who created insight in them; as they were unable to do this themselves.

Those were not the normal angelic spirits who accompany human beings through several lives on earth. They had luciferic character, for their disposition had remained at the earlier, moon level of development. Thus we are able to say that the ancient wisdom arose when spirits who should have gone through their normal human stage of development on the ancient moon let their soul powers enter into and ensoul human beings, and people would have part in the Angel’s experiences inside them, gaining an extraordinarily sublime insight in this way. The wisdom given to the angelic beings during the moon evolution was at a high level of perfection, but it was not really something which people could put to any real use on earth. People acted more or less out of instinct on earth, we might say they acted like a higher kind of animal. And into this creature shone the sublime wisdom which began to fade away towards the 8th century BC.

This wisdom—definitely luciferic the way it is presented above—really related only to anything that showed the human being to be a citizen of other worlds. With regard to their perceptions, therefore, human beings had not yet really come to earth. They felt themselves to be in higher spheres in their wisdom, and their actions on earth were instinctive.

There followed the development that goes hand in hand with the intellectual or mind soul. Human beings began to let the mind be active in them and evolve concepts. Greek civilization still had the angelic wisdom of earlier times but worked it through with human concepts. Plato’s4Plato (c. 427–c. 347 BC), Athenian philosopher. wisdom makes such an impression on us because he was subjectively evolving concepts and ideas, but the old instinctive wisdom still shone into the process. His writings therefore are a marvellous combination of the highest wisdom and a way of thinking that was human and individual. Considering Plato’s mind and spirit it would be impossible to imagine him writing his philosophical works in a form other than that of dialogues, for the simple reason that he was definitely aware of a wisdom that had only been an indefinite feeling to earlier people. They would say: The wisdom simply exists; it comes to me and radiates into me. Plato found himself in a form of dialogue with the entity that brought wisdom into him. Experiencing this wisdom in dialogue he also preferred to express it through dialogue.

Soon, however, conceptual thinking became more prevalent. Aristotle5Aristotle (384–322 BC), Greek philosopher, scientist and physician. already presented his knowledge in a complex of theories.

As the fourth post-Atlantean age progressed, a civilizatory element gained influence that may be described as follows: People felt that an ancient wisdom had filled human souls in times past. They felt that superhuman entities had come down and brought this wisdom to humanity. But they were also aware that this wisdom was becoming more abstract. They could not longer grasp it; it eluded them.

Roman civilization is characterized by a mind that made everything abstract. The Romans evolved a dry, abstract way of thinking that did not perceive in images and wanted to live only in the forms of the mind. With the Greeks we still feel that the figures of their gods, that is, the elemental principles in the world of nature, had an inner life. The Roman gods were stiff, abstract concepts. Logic gained the upper hand over the imaginative thinking that had still been widespread in ancient Greece. Anything the Romans still had by way of imagination actually came from Greece. The Romans introduced the prosaic, logical thinking that was later to give the Latin language the logical quality that was to govern civilization for ages to come.

One thing continued on, however—in a more living way through Greek culture and a slightly more dead way through Roman culture, into the Christian era and right into the Middle Ages—and that was the tradition of the ancient wisdom. This has persisted more than people are inclined to think today. The world that presented itself to the senses could not be immediately grasped with the mind, but people sought to grasp the traditional element in this way. The result was that an element which before had been luciferic, inwardly enlivening, gained an ahrimanic character that was also outwardly apparent, as a mask. In reality this is a luciferic element which continues by tradition. Romanism continued through the centuries; a strong Germanic element came into it, but the tradition survived and it was essentially luciferic. Its original character was lost because it streamed down into the realm of thought and became formulated in thoughts. We may say that in the Latin language, a luciferic element lives on in an ahrimanic way.

This luciferic element was still very much alive in Greek art. It then became more or less rigid and it is interesting to see how it extended into theology, which had to do with other worlds, yet had no real access to those worlds; all it had was the tradition. A spiritual stream that was essentially luciferic thus brought the ancient perception of other worlds into theology.

The Christian faith also got caught up in the meshes of this theology; it became theology. The language of Rome was made logical, the Christian faith theological. The true life of Christianity was submerged in a luciferic element that bore an ahrimanic mask. The personal and individual element was always there, but it was more instinctive. It was not able to unite fully with the element which came from above. It is particularly interesting to observe this when it was at its most striking, during the Renaissance. There we see a highly developed theology with concepts and ideas of other worlds but no perception. Everything took the form of tradition during the Renaissance. Romanism had preserved the original, ancient wisdom in a theology that had brought it down into the realm of ideas, where it lived on as a luciferic element. Those theologizing elements are still marvellously apparent in Raphael’s wall paintings in Rome, the Disputa, for instance.6Raphael, or Raffaello Santi or Sanzio (1483–1520), Italian painter. Profound wisdom, more or less living on in words, no longer offering perception, but holding true wisdom for those who are able to connect it with perception. We also admire the theology in Dante’s Divine Comedy,7Dante Alighieri (1265–1321), greatest Italian poet. though we know that whilst Dante gained some of the old true perception—thanks to his teacher Brunetto Latini,8Brunette Latini (c. 1210–c. 1295), Florentine statesman, scholar and poet. as I have shown on another occasion9published in How can Mankind Find the Christ Again? (GA 187) Tr. F.E. Dawson, G. Hahn, O. D. Wannamaker. London: Rudolf Steiner Press.—most of the work represents the traditional, theologizing approach with a strong luciferic element in it. We can also see that the entities which brought the ancient wisdom into the theologizing element also brought the essence of Greek art into the art of the Renaissance, a Greek art that originally had soul quality before and had become more rigid, but still came down through tradition. Goethe10Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832), German poet, dramatist, scientist and statesman. was therefore able to perceive the resurrection of Greek art in the art of the Renaissance.

It has to be said that there is a powerful luciferic element in the theology and in the art that have come to us from the past. To be artistic, this art must look for elements that belong to other worlds, and it is not able to descend fully to the human level. Where it does so, it seems to us to have made a sudden leap down to the level of instinct. Looking at Renaissance life, we see that people had ideas of heaven—no vision any more—and were able to bring those ideas to life in their art in a truly marvellous way. Beneath this, however, we see Renaissance life deteriorate to the level of instincts. World history presents magnificent but sometimes also horrific scenes where Pope Alexander VI, for instance, or Leo X, are on the one hand great scholars, having ideas of the most sublime aspects of other worlds, yet on the other hand are unable, as Renaissance people, to let their personal life rise to that level, letting it degenerate to the life of instincts. It is a terrible thing to see those individuals develop a kind of higher animal life on the one hand, and spreading above this a heaven that is luciferic by nature, a heaven presented to human minds in a theology that is truly wonderful and at the same time also entirely luciferic.

With this, we are coming to an age when powers other than those older angelic spirits became involved in human evolution.

Humanity is halfway between the world of the angels and that of the animals. In past ages the human form was quite animal-like, but ensouled with the element I have just described. Without a clue as to the reality of this situation, modern geologists and palaeontologists are turning up ancient human remains that show receding foreheads and animal-like human forms and believe this shows that humans are related to animals. This is quite right if one considers only the outer physical form, but the more animal-like those forms become as we go back in time, the more are they ensouled with original wisdom. If all that modern geologists and palaeontologists are able to say about the remains dug up in some parts of Europe a few years ago is that these were human beings with low skulls, receding foreheads, prominent brows and eye-sockets, anyone who knows the true situation has to say: This human being, who may look animal-like today and to palaeontologists who see only the outer appearance may appear to have evolved from apes, was fully ensouled with an ancient, original wisdom. Another spiritual entity had that wisdom in the human being who merely had a share in it. In the past, therefore, human beings held within them a superhuman principle. They grew increasingly towards this as they evolved out of animal-like forms, finally to become a kind of super-animal which included all the different animal forms. This super-animal offered conditions where an ahrimanic entity that was very different from the usual angelic spirits was able to enter. The human being who combines intellectual thinking with an animal-like organization came to the fore at the time when the wisdom of old was fading and becoming tradition. From the 8th century BC, human evolution took a course, slowly at first, but progressively, where a kind of ahrimanic super-animal nature developed from inside which then also entered the human soul from the other side.

The spirit which meets with the luciferic spirit in the human being, as it were, may be said to be another one who sought to deflect human beings from the true path. The luciferic spirits may be said to be spirits of ire in the human soul who do not intend human beings to be glad to be on earth but draw them away from the earth, over and over again, always wanting to draw them up towards the superhuman. They want him to be an angel who does not have anything to do with the lower functions of the physical organism. It angers the luciferic spirits to see people walk the earth on their two feet who are connected to the earth through their lower functions. They want to strip all animal nature away from people. Today, at the present stage of human evolution, for example, they do not want to let individuals come to physical incarnation; they want to keep them up above in the life that passes between death and a new birth.

The ahrimanic spirits, on the other hand, may be called spirits of pain and suffering. They seek to achieve the human form for themselves but are unable to do so. Essentially these ahrimanic spirits suffer terrible pain. It is as if an animal were to feel dimly: You ought to come upright and be a human being—as if it wanted to tear itself apart inwardly. That is the terrible pain experienced by the ahrimanic spirits. It can only be relieved by approaching human beings and taking hold of their minds. This will cool the pain. These spirits therefore get their teeth into the human mind, digging their claws into it, boring themselves into it.11Phrase coined by Steiner Ahrimanic nature involves something that is like painfully letting the human mind enter into you. Ahrimanic spirits want to unite with human beings so that they may come to their senses, as it were.

Thus the human being is the battle ground for luciferic and ahrimanic elements. It would be fair to say that the luciferic element is involved in anything to do with the arts and with abstract theology. The ahrimanic element is like something coming up from the world of matter that has gone through the animal world and painfully seeks to achieve human status, taking hold of the human mind; it is repulsed by the part of the human being that is higher than human nature; again and again it is thrown back, though it wishes to take the human mind for itself. Again and again this element wants to enter into human beings and make them go by the intellect alone, preventing them from developing the higher faculties of Imagination and Inspiration, seeking to keep humanity at their level, so as to ease their own pain.

Everything which has developed during the more recent ahrimanic age by way of materialistic science, a science that comes from the burning pain of material existence that is cooled in the human being, is ahrimanic by nature. We see this materialistic science arise as human beings evolve it. When people give their inner life to this science, Ahriman unites with them through it. Lucifer has a hand above all in the sphere of the arts; Ahriman has a hand in the development of mechanics, technology, anything that seeks to take the human intellect away from people and put it into machine tools and also the machinery of government. This alone has made the developments possible which have arisen mainly from the time of the Renaissance onwards. We might say that luciferic activity came to a kind of dead end during the Renaissance and that ahrimanic activity then took over. We can see how everything since then has gone in the direction of mechanization, and a science divorced from the realm of the spirit.

If the industrial technology and materialistic science which has evolved from Renaissance times and is entirely ahrimanic by nature is allowed to spread without there being any understanding of Christ, it will bind human beings to the earth and prevent them from reaching the Jupiter stage. Yet if we bring understanding of Christ, a new life of the spirit, and Imagination, Inspiration and Intuition to what at present is mere discovery of the physical world, we will redeem ahrimanic nature. This redemption can be presented in images, as I have done in many different ways in my Mystery Plays. Humanity will however be overcome by Ahriman unless understanding of Christ, an understanding that is truly of the spirit and free from all theology, is able to develop. Materialistic science and industrial technology would condemn humanity to earthly death, that is, they would craft a completely different world in which human beings live on as a kind of petrified fossils for the edification of ahrimanic spirits, and this will happen unless spiritual understanding of Christ spreads through the mechanization of our age.

We are thus able to say that Lucifer has a hand in all traditional theology, all art that is stiff and mannered, anything by way of renaissance; Ahriman has a hand in all materialistic science divorced from the realm of the spirit and unable to find the spirit in the world of nature, and in all aspects of human activity that are mechanical and without inwardness. The luciferic angelic spirits who have survived till today on the basis of tradition are only interested in keeping people from actually doing anything at all. They want to keep them confined to the inner life. Human beings have become individuals, but these angelic spirits do not want human actions to flow out into life and activity, into a manifestation of human will impulses. They want to keep people in an introspective frame of mind, to look rather than take action, to be mystics and follow the wrong kind of theosophy. They like people to sit musing all day, pursuing a thread through all kinds of riddles of the world and unwilling to apply the things they have in mind to the real world outside. They want detached observation to lead to a science of the outside world. They are good at creating a science like the one of Father Secchi,12Father Angelo Secchi (1818–1878) Italian astronomer trained as a Jesuit, Professor of Physics, Washington, USA, and from 1849 director of the observatory at the Coliegio Romano. who was an excellent astrophysicist, being able to make observations using the microscope and telescope and record them, and who also had something that did not relate to this at all, a sublime wisdom greater than the wisdom of this earth and of the human mind that had been given to him by luciferic spirits. The luciferic spirits nurture this wisdom and in doing so tear the human soul and spirit away from earth existence. And however great our materialistic science may be, it comes to nothing, for it has no inner reality of the spirit. This is of no interest to the luciferic spirits.

These spirits also want art to be as lifeless and devoid of spirit as possible, so that no spirit may enter into the forms created. They want nothing but the revival of things that existed in the past. They make people hate any kind of new style that may truly arise out of the present day. They want to reproduce the old styles because they come from a time when things could still be taken from unearthly realms.

On the other hand it is ahrimanic nature not to let a style or anything of a spiritual nature develop but rather to create utterly prosaic, purpose-designed buildings, mechanize everything and let it serve industry, letting people attach no value to hand-made arts and crafts and merely produce models which machines can reproduce in endless numbers. In the same way Ahriman can manifest in an infinite number of examples in many human beings through the mystery of numbers.

The human beings of today are caught in the midst of this battle. They need to realize that anthroposophy enables them to find and perceive the spirit and is therefore the true gift of Christ. Holding on to this they can keep the balance between luciferic and ahrimanic elements and thus find their way. They have to fight the ahrimanic spirit, for otherwise they must fall to the luciferic spirit. It is important, however, to be watchful when they give themselves up to the streams of Ahriman, lest they fall into a world that is entirely mechanized. The luciferic spirits want to prevent human beings from taking action; they want to make them mystics, given up to thought, who will gradually cease to take an interest in life on earth and can in this way be made remote from this life. The ahrimanic spirits want to keep human beings very much to life on earth. They want to mechanize everything, that is, take it down to the level of the mineral world. If they succeeded they would reshape the world to suit themselves and prevent it from reaching the Jupiter stage. On the other hand they do not want to deprive people of the opportunity to act; on the contrary, they want them to be as active as possible, except that it should all be routine and according to programme. Ahriman is a real programme enthusiast. It is he who inspires people to have endless statutes. He is really in his element if he finds a committee busily engaged in setting up statutes: Paragraph one, two and three—in the first place this is to be done, in the second place something else, in the third place one member has those particular rights, and in the fourth place another member is to do one thing or another. Of course, the members will never think of respecting those rights and may well refuse to do what it says in the statutes. That is not the point, however. Once the statutes exist, it is a matter of acting in the spirit of Ahriman, always pointing to paragraph number such and such.

Ahriman wants people to be active, but within the system, with everything firmly laid down in paragraphs. People should really find a list of things to be done on their pillow when they wake up in the morning and carry it all out mechanically, thinking only with their legs, as it were and not their heads. Lucifer wants them to use their heads and pour their hearts into their heads; Ahriman seeks to make people think only with their legs, pour everything into the legs.

People are caught up in the battle. I am trying to give you a picture of something which essentially is already part of our culture. We see people whose idea of perfection is to sit on folded legs like a Buddha figure and introspectively rise to sublime levels, not using their legs at all, but their heads swelling as they enter into mysterious depths. In the Western world we see others who hardly know how to get more quickly from one office to another, from business to business on their legs, so that we get the impression that it is really quite unnecessary for them to carry a head on their shoulders, for essentially their heads are not involved in their doings. Those are the two extremes in our time—solitary figures sitting thinking with eyes closed so that they may not even see what they themselves are doing, and others who actually don’t need eyes, for they have strings that pull their legs, and at the other end of those strings are the different paragraphs, with people pulled along as if they were part of a mechanism.

Occasionally we see modern people rebel against the ahrimanic trend and complain of the bureaucracy, which is of course entirely ahrimanic, against standardization in education, and so on. But as a rule all that happens is that they slide even deeper into the situation from which they want to escape.

The only thing to take us out of it all it to direct the whole of our minds and hearts to the search for the spirit, to an understanding that brings true spirituality to our thinking, with the true spirit taking hold of the whole human being and not merely the head. This will overcome the ahrimanic element and in so doing redeem it. We are not saying anything against ahrimanic nature, nor against all the situations where keeping of records and making of statutes and paragraphs have their rightful place. But the spirit must enter into it all.

We cannot really avoid using the ahrimanic skills in the present age—taking shorthand, for instance, and using a typewriter. These are highly ahrimanic elements in our civilization. But we can also bring the spirit into it, and in this way raise such ahrimanic influences as stenography and typewriting into the sphere of the spirit, redeeming Ahriman in the process. It is only possible to do this if we bring the life of the spirit fully to mind. People who live as materialists today, using stenography and typewriters, get deeply caught up in the ahrimanic element. You see, it is not my purpose to preach reaction against these things; the demonic world that has come on us is not to be given a bad name; but the demons themselves need to be redeemed.

This may certainly also show itself in individual instances. Basically we may say that the ahrimanic elements which have entered into our civilization in more recent times really only pursue their ahrimanic skills because they are inclined that way. The things they write in shorthand or on typewriters might just as well stay unwritten. We usually know all about it and there is no need to put it down on paper. The content does not matter, for only the ahrimanic skill has some significance. Yet it will be good to have the things that are coming up in the science of the spirit laid down exactly, for it is necessary to express ourselves in a careful, accurate way. And in this respect the ahrimanic element will be able to serve the realm of the spirit well.

It will be of special importance that the modern science of the spirit enters fully into the different human sciences and advances them from natural sciences devoid of spirit to a truly consistent science of the spirit, with the individual sciences as chapters in a unified science of the spirit. This will deahrimanize them, and if details are handled in the right way we gradually come into the stream that I had to present to you today, developing it out of the polarity between the luciferic and ahrimanic elements.

Please do not think it is irrelevant to go into detail the way I have done today. It is good to enter into this to some extent, using the kind of images I have used today, with today’s luciferic individual sitting on crossed legs, and ahrimanic people who rush from office to office, a finger in every pie, and who really don’t need to use their heads to keep their busy lives going.

You may feel more comfortable if abstract ideas are presented to you rather than concrete images, but the modern, anthroposophical science of the spirit must relate directly to life and indeed call a spade a spade. This, after all, is the only way to develop sound, proper ideas and the right inner attitude.

This is what I wanted to add today. The next time we’ll try and use a different approach to the nature of the human being.

Vierzehnter Vortrag

[ 1 ] Es wird gut sein, um eine Erweiterung zu bekommen zu den Ausführungen, die in der letzten Zeit hier von mir gemacht worden sind, zunächst einmal zurückzublicken in der Menschheitsentwickelung auf Zeiten, in denen das, was wir heute erkennen nennen, einen ganz anderen Charakter hatte. Wir haben ja von diesem anderen Charakter der menschlichen Erkenntnis in früheren Zeiten schon gesprochen. Allein mit dem, was wir nun in den letzten Vorträgen hier gewonnen haben, werden wir noch manches Licht auf schon Bekanntes werfen können.

[ 2 ] Die menschliche Erkenntnis hat eigentlich einen ganz anderen Charakter angenommen, als sie früher hatte, in der Zeit, als das Griechentum, das Römertum in die Geschichte eingetreten ist. Was dem Griechentum, dem Römertum im Oriente, in Afrika vorangegangen ist an Erkenntnis, war eben ganz anderer Art als das, was dann zunächst in einer großartigen Weise durch die Griechen inauguriert worden ist, was durch die Römer abstrakt gemacht worden ist, und was dann in der neuesten Zeit immer mehr in den Materialismus hineingeführt worden ist. Es ist etwa der Beginn des 8. vorchristlichen Jahrhunderts, in dem die Erkenntnis einen solchen Charakter annimmt, wie er, allerdings mit wesentlichen Modifikationen, auch heute vorhanden ist. Wir konnten bisher die ältere Erkenntnis hauptsächlich in der Weise charakterisieren, daß wir sagten: Es war eine Art instinktiven Schauens. Es war nicht ein Erkenntnisleben in Begriffen, es war ein Erkenntnisleben in Bildern, die zwar nicht vollständig ähnlich sind unseren Traumbildern, weil sie sich ja auf geistige Wirklichkeiten bezogen, die aber doch eben in der Seele lebten nicht mit der Bestimmtheit unserer heutigen Begriffswelt, sondern die mehr in der Form vorübergehender Bilder eben im Bewußtsein vorhanden waren.

[ 3 ] Diese Erkenntnis bezog sich aber nun nicht eigentlich auf das, was heute Inhalt unserer Erkenntnis ist, sondern sie bezog sich mehr auf diejenigen Welten, aus denen sich der Mensch als aus den Urwelten heraus gebildet hat, in denen er noch so enthalten war, daß er sich wenig von ihnen abtrennte. Der Mensch war während der Saturn-, Sonnen- und Mondenentwickelung noch völlig ein Glied der ganzen übrigen Welt. Aber auch während der älteren Erdenentwickelung war die Persönlichkeit noch nicht abgegliedert von dem allgemeinen Weltinhalt. Der Mensch fühlte sich gewissermaßen in dem allgemeinen Welteninhalt drinnen. Sobald der Mensch von seiner eigentlichen intellektuellen Erkenntnis, von der Kopferkenntnis abkommt und es etwa so macht, wie noch gewisse orientalische Schulen, die sich durch Atmungsprozesse eine Art von Erkenntnis zu erringen suchen, da ist es ja auch sogleich so, daß dieses scharfe Sich-Abtrennen von der Welt nicht mehr vorhanden ist. In dem Augenblicke, wo der Mensch heute die antiquierten Jogaübungen, die aber immer noch vorkommen, macht, fühlt er sich sogleich in seiner Persönlichkeit herabgesetzt und herabgedämpft, er fühlt sich selber, ich möchte sagen, wie ein Hauch der Welt.

[ 4 ] Solch einen Charakter hatte eben die Erkenntnis in jener älteren Zeit auch, wo aber der Mensch durch diese bildhafte Erkenntnis durchaus deuten konnte — in dem Sinne, wie ich das gestern auseinandergesetzt habe - sein eigenes physisches Innere. Wir haben ja gestern darauf aufmerksam gemacht, wie der Mensch heute seine Umgebung aufnimmt, wie er sie dann als Vorstellung bewahrt, wie das dann sein Inneres ist, und er aus diesem Inneren heraus gewissermaßen ein Bild seiner Welt zwischen der Geburt und dem jetzigen Augenblicke repräsentieren kann. So repräsentiert dasjenige, was wir als Organe, als Gehirn, Lunge, Leber in uns tragen, den ganzen Weltinhalt. So wie man aus einer Erinnerungsvorstellung einen Vorgang deuten kann, den man erlebt hat, so wie man also als Vorstellung diesen Vorgang in sich trägt, so trägt man in seinen inneren Organen, in Lunge, Herz und so weiter die ganze Welt in sich. Und die alte Weisheit hat darinnen bestanden, daß man diese einzelnen Organe gedeutet hat, daß man sie bezogen hat auf den ganzen Weltinhalt.

[ 5 ] Es war im wesentlichen die ältere, noch bis in das 9. vorchristliche Jahrhundert herein dauernde Erkenntnis eine solche, die aus dem inneren physischen Wesen des Menschen, physisch-ätherischen Wesen des Menschen — man sah natürlich das Innere anders, als es ein heutiger Anatom oder Physiologe sieht — sich den Weltinhalt deutete. Jedes einzelne innere Organ wurde auf etwas in der Außenwelt bezogen, aber es war dieses innere Organ von innen aus erlebt. Man erlebte also den Gehirnbau in mächtigen Bildern, und die Bilder bezog man wieder auf die ganze Himmelssphäre, so daß man in der Tat durch diese alte Erkenntnis aus dem in der atavistischen Imagination angedeuteten Gehirnbau sich eine Vorstellung machte von der ganzen Himmelssphäre. Und was in der alten Weisheit enthalten ist über die Welt, ist im wesentlichen aus solcher Deutung des inneren Menschen entstanden.

[ 6 ] Nun kann man aber eigentlich nicht einmal sagen, daß das, was da als Erkenntnis lebte, eine richtige menschliche Erkenntnis war. Richtige menschliche Erkenntnis, wenn sie auch durchaus nicht sein soll trockener reiner Intellektualismus, als was sie heute vielfach angesehen wird, ist doch nicht denkbar ohne Intelligenz. Jene alte Weisheit war aber durchaus ohne eine vom Menschen zustande gebrachte Intelligenz, so daß man gar nicht sagen kann, diese alte Weisheit war eine eigentliche menschliche Erkenntnis. Der Mensch nahm gewissermaßen nur teil an einer Erkenntnis, die eigentlich andere Wesen in ihm hatten. Und dies waren Wesen, die zur Hierarchie der Angeloi gehörten. Ein solcher Angelos durchseelte den Menschen und der war es eigentlich, der diese alte Erkenntnis hatte. Der Mensch nahm nur daran teil. Er sah gewissermaßen in das Innere dieses Angelos hinein. Daher nahm er teil an dem, was der Angelos erkannte. Daher hatte auch der Besitzer jener alten Weisheit eine sehr unbestimmte Anschauung von dem, wie er zu seinen Erkenntnissen kam. Er sagte sich einfach: Das ist Eingebung, das ist da — weil er selber diese Erkenntnis nicht zustande brachte, weil das Engelwesen in ihm diese Erkenntnis zustande brachte.

[ 7 ] Aber dieses Engelwesen war auch kein solches, wie wir es in diesen verflossenen Tagen jetzt hier von dem normalen Engelwesen, das den Menschen begleitet durch die verschiedenen Erdenleben hindurch, angenommen haben, sondern dieses Engelwesen hatte einen luziferischen Charakter. Es war gewissermaßen mit seinem ganzen Wesen, mit seiner ganzen Gesinnung zurückgeblieben auf einer früheren Stufe der Entwickelung, auf der Stufe der Mondenentwickelung. So daß man sagen kann: Wesenheiten, die während der Mondenentwickelung eigentlich ihre normale Menschheitsstufe hätten durchmachen sollen, luziferische Wesenheiten beseelten oder durchseelten den Menschen für die ältere Weisheit, und der Mensch nahm an dem, was dieses Engelwesen in ihm erlebte, teil. Es war das, was da der Mensch als eine solche Weisheit bekam, eine außerordentlich hohe Erkenntnis. Es war diejenige Erkenntnis, die eben als eine sehr vollendete während der Mondenentwickelung dem Engelwesen zuteil geworden war, aber es war eben keine Erkenntnis, die eigentlich für den Menschen so geeignet war, daß er auf der Erde etwas damit anzufangen wußte. Auf der Erde benahm sich der Mensch mehr oder weniger instinktiv, ich möchte sagen, wie ein höheres Tier benahm er sich. Und dann leuchtete aber in dieses gleichsam noch höhere Tierwesen diese hohe Weisheit herein, diese hohe Weisheit, die abdämmerte, als das 8. vorchristliche Jahrhundert heraufzog.

[ 8 ] Diese Weisheit, die ja in dem angedeuteten Sinne durchaus einen luziferischen Charakter hatte, erstreckte sich eigentlich nur auf alles das, was den Menschen als einen Angehörigen außerirdischer Welten erkennen ließ. Der Mensch hatte sozusagen mit seiner Erkenntnis die Erde noch gar nicht in Wirklichkeit betreten. Er fühlte sich noch innerhalb höherer Sphären mit seiner Weisheit, und auf der Erde hantierte er instinktiv.

[ 9 ] Dann trat immer mehr und mehr dasjenige ein, was eben mit der Verstandes- oder Gemütsseele heraufkommen konnte. Der Mensch begann in sich selber den Verstand rege zu machen. Der Mensch begann Begriffe auszuarbeiten. Die griechische Kultur zeichnete sich dadurch aus, daß sie eigentlich durchaus aus alten Zeiten noch, ich möchte sagen, jene Engelweisheit hatte, aber sie durcharbeitete mit menschlichen Begriffen. Und eine solche Weisheit wie die Weisheit Platos, die macht auf uns eben einen so großen Eindruck aus dem Grunde, weil bei Plato schon vorhanden war das subjektive Erarbeiten der Begriffs- oder Vorstellungswelt, zugleich aber hereinstrahlte in dieses Erarbeiten die alte instinktive Weisheit. Daher die Platonischen Schriften in einer so wunderbaren Weise höchste Weisheit verbinden mit dem, was doch schon im Elemente des Menschlich-Persönlichen lebt. Und man kann sich, wenn man die ganze Seelenverfassung Platos ins Auge faßt, gar nicht denken, daß er in einer anderen Form als in der Dialogform seine Weisheitsbücher abgefaßt haben könnte, aus dem einfachen Grunde, weil er deutlich spürte, was der ältere Mensch unbestimmt empfand. Der ältere Mensch sagte sich: Die Weisheit ist einfach da, sie erfaßt mich, sie strahlt in mich herein. Plato fand sich selbst in einer Art von Wechselgespräch mit dem Wesen, das in ihn herein die Weisheit brachte. Wie im Dialog erlebte er selber die Weisheit, daher er sie auch am liebsten im Dialog zum Ausdruck brachte.

[ 10 ] Dann aber ist rasch dies gekommen, daß sich diese Begriffstätigkeit verstärkt hat. Und bei Aristoteles sehen wir schon durchaus die Erkenntnis uns in Form eines theoretischen Gewebes entgegentreten.

[ 1 ] Dann gewinnt immer mehr und mehr in dem vierten nachatlantischen Zeitraum ein gewisses Kulturelement den größeren Einfluß, das wir so bezeichnen können, daß wir sagen: Es fühlten die Menschen, daß einmal eine alte Weisheit die Seele durchsetzt hatte. Sie fühlten, daß zu ihnen heruntergestiegen waren übermenschliche Wesenheiten und die Weisheit gebracht hatten. Aber sie fühlten auch, wie diese Weisheit sich verabstrahierte. Sie konnten das nicht mehr erfassen; es entströmte ihnen, was ehedem aus geistigen Welten heruntergeflossen ist.

[ 12 ] Dieses Betätigen des menschlichen Verstandes, der dann alles ins Abstrakte hineingestaltete, das finden wir insbesondere im Römertum. Das Römertum entwickelte ja ein trockenes, ein abstraktes Wesen, ein bildfremdes Wesen, ein Wesen, das in den Verstandesformen leben wollte. Während wir durch den Griechen noch immer das Gefühl haben: die Göttergestalten, also das, was als Elementares der Welt, der Natur zugrunde lag, das habe ein inneres Leben, sind die römischen Götter Abstraktionen, haben einen starren, steifen Begriffscharakter. Das logische Wesen nimmt überhand gegenüber dem früheren imaginativen Wesen, das noch in Griechenland so stark ausgebreitet war. Alles, was die Römer noch an Imagination gehabt haben, entstammte ja Griechenland. Die Römer haben das Prosaelement, das Element der Logizität hinzugebracht und haben es dann auch als Romanismus in die späteren Zeiten fortentwickelt, daher dann die lateinische Sprache jenen logischen Charakter angenommen hat, durch den sie so lange Zeit hindurch kulturgestaltend gewirkt hat.

[ 13 ] Aber eines hat sich erhalten, durch das Griechentum noch lebendiger, durch das Römertum etwas toter, aber es hat sich dann fortgepflanzt auch in die nachchristlichen Jahrhunderte bis ins Mittelalter herein, ja sogar bis zu der Morgendämmerung der neueren Zeit: es hat sich fortgepflanzt die Tradition der alten Weisheit. Und mehr als die Menschen heute denken, hat sich die Tradition dieser alten Weisheit fortgepflanzt.

[ 14 ] Man konnte doch nicht das, was sich für die Sinne ringsherum ausbreitete, mit dem Verstande gleich erfassen. Man suchte das Traditionelle mit dem Verstande zu erfassen. Dadurch aber gewann das, was früher ein innerlich belebendes luziferisches Element war, einen sogar äußerlichen ahrimanischen Charakter. Das ist aber die Maske. In Wahrheit ist es ein luziferisches Element, das sich durch Tradition fortpflanzt. Und was wir von der Zeit des römischen Kaisertums an durch die folgenden Jahrhunderte an Romanismus sich fortpflanzen sehen, was dann sehr stark durchtränkt wird vom germanischen Elemente, was sich aber doch bewahrt in der Tradition, das ist ein im wesentlichen luziferisches Element. Das luziferische Element wirkt weiter. Es wird natürlich dadurch, daß es herunterströmt bis in das Gedankenwesen, seines ursprünglichen Charakters entkleidet. Es geht in Gedankenform auf. In der lateinischen Sprache lebt, ich möchte sagen, auf ahrimanische Art ein luziferisches Element weiter.

[ 15 ] In der griechischen Kunst ist dieses Element noch durchaus lebendig. Dann wird es mehr oder weniger starr, und es ist interessant zu verfolgen, wie es sich fortsetzt in die Theologie hinein, die eine Lehre von übersinnlichen Welten ist, aber die übersinnlichen Welten selber doch nicht hat, die übersinnlichen Welten nur der Tradition nach hat. Und so entsteht diejenige Geistesströmung, die im wesentlichen eine Art luziferische ist und die die alte Anschauung des Übersinnlichen ins Theologische herüberführt.

[ 16 ] Das Christentum selber wird in die Maschen dieser Theologie hineingezogen. Das Christentum wird theologisiert. So wie in der römischen Sprache ein Logisieren eintritt, so tritt mit dem Christentum ein Theologisieren ein. Aber das eigentliche lebensvolle Element des Christentums geht da in einem luziferischen Element, das eine ahrimanische Maske trägt, unter. Es wird das lebendige Christentum zu einer theologisierenden Kulturströmung. Darunter ist immer schon das eigentliche persönliche Element wirksam, aber noch auf eine instinktive Weise. Es kann sich noch nicht völlig vereinigen mit dem, was von oben kommt. Und es ist ja insbesondere interessant, dies zu beobachten in seiner eklatanten Phase, in der Phase der Renaissance. Da sehen wir, wie eine hohe T'heologie lebt, die durchaus die Begriffe, die Vorstellungen vom Übersinnlichen hat, aber nicht mehr die Anschauung hat. Traditionell ist im Grunde genommen zur Zeit der Renaissance alles da. Was im Romanismus bewahrt wird in der theologischen Form, das ist uralte Weisheit, aber ins Vorstellungsleben heruntergeholt. Es lebt in den Vorstellungen luziferisch weiter.

[ 17 ] Es ist wunderbar, was heute noch geschaut werden kann an solchen theologisierenden Elementen, wenn man die Raffaelschen Wandbilder in Rom sieht, was da in jenem Bilde, das die Disputa genannt wird, eigentlich lebt an theologisierendem Elemente. Tiefe Weisheit, die mehr oder weniger in Worten weiterlebt, die nicht mehr Anschauungen in sich hegt, die aber für denjenigen, der sie mit den Anschauungen verbinden kann, eben tiefste Weisheit ist.

[ 18 ] Wir bewundern auch die Theologie, die in Dantes «Göttlicher Komödie» lebt, wissen aber zu gleicher Zeit, daß bei Dante zwar gewisse Anschauungen wiederum errungen worden sind durch seinen Lehrer Brunetto Latini — ich habe das einmal auseinandergesetzt -—, daß aber dennoch das weitaus meiste eigentlich traditionelles, theologisierendes Element ist, das einen starken luziferischen Einschlag hat. Und wir sehen auf der anderen Seite, wie jene Wesen, welche so alte Weisheit in. das theologisierende Element hineintragen, wie diese Wesen diejenigen sind, die nun auch das griechische Kunstwesen, nachdem sie es vorher beseelt haben, mehr versteift, aber doch noch durch Tradition so hineintragen in die Renaissancekunst, daß Goethe die griechische Kunst in seinem Geiste wiederum auferstehen sieht, indem er diese griechische Kunst in der Renaissancekunst wiederum erblickte.

[ 19 ] Man muß sagen: Durchaus ein starkes luziferisches Element lebt in der Theologie, lebt in der Kunst, wie sie uns aus alten Zeiten heraufgebracht worden ist, jener Kunst, die vorzugsweise suchen muß, damit sie künstlerisch sein kann, Überirdisches, die nicht vollständig herunterkommen kann bis zum Menschen. Da, wo sie herunterkommt, erscheint sie uns wie mit einem Sprung herunterversetzt in das Instinktive. Denn wir sehen ja das Leben der Renaissance selber so, daß es gewissermaßen in sich hat den Himmel, von dem es Vorstellungen hat, keine Anschauungen mehr, Vorstellungen, die es sogar künstlerisch wunderbar beleben kann; wir sehen aber darunter sich entwickeln ein instinktives Ausarten des Renaissancelebens. Es ist immerhin ein großartiges, aber eigentlich manchmal schreckhaftes Schauspiel der Weltgeschichte, wie so ein Papst Alexander VI. oder auch Leo X., auf der einen Seite gelehrte, durch und durch gelehrte Menschen sind, wie sie das Höchste von übersinnlichen Welten in ihren Vorstellungen tragen, wie sie aber als Renaissancemenschen das, was menschliche Persönlichkeit ist, nicht erheben können bis in diese geistige Höhe, wie das da unten instinktiv ausartet. Und so sehen wir diese Schreckenskerle, die Renaissancemenschen, auf der einen Seite etwas wie ein höheres tierisches Leben entfalten, und darüber sehen wir sich ausbreiten, den luziferischen Charakter tragend, den Himmel, der in einer auf der einen Seite wunderbaren, auf der anderen Seite eben durchaus luziferischen Theologie vorstellungsgemäß an die Menschen herangebracht worden ist.

[ 20 ] Damit aber kommen wir auch schon in jene Zeit hinein, in der dann andere Mächte die Menschheitsentwickelung ergriffen, als es diese älteren, engelhaften Wesenheiten waren.

[ 21 ] Der Mensch steht ja in der Mitte zwischen dem Reich der Angeloi und dem Reich der Tiere. Seine äußere physische Form war in älteren Zeiten sehr tierähnlich, aber sie war doch beseelt von demjenigen, was ich Ihnen eben jetzt geschildert habe. Ohne irgendeine Ahnung von dem, was auf diesem Gebiete wahr ist, stöbern heute die Geologen, die Paläontologen menschliche Reste aus alten Zeiten auf mit zurückfliehender Stirne, tierähnliche Menschengestalten, und glauben, damit den Menschen an das Tier heranzubringen. Der äußeren physischen Gestalt nach ist das durchaus berechtigt, aber zu je tierischeren Formen wir in der’ alten Zeit zurückkommen, um so mehr sind diese tierischen Formen durchseelt von uralter Weisheit. Und wenn man diese tierähnlichen Formen vor ein paar Jahren in gewissen Gegenden Europas ausgrub und nun mit heutiger Geologie und Paläontologie nur zu sagen weiß: Das sind Menschen mit einem niedrigen Schädel, mit zurückfliehender Stirn, mit vortretenden Augenbrauen, Augenhöhlen -— muß man sagen, wenn man die Wahrheit kennt auf diesem Gebiete: Dieser Mensch, der heute vielleicht so tierähnlich aussieht, der dem äußeren Paläontologen wie ein höher entwickelter Affe erscheint, der war aber voll durchseelt von uralter Weisheit, die eben ein anderes Wesen in ihm hatte. Er nahm nur teil daran.

[ 22 ] So kann man sagen: Den Menschen erfüllt in alten Zeiten ein Übermenschliches. Er wächst dem immer mehr und mehr entgegen, indem er sich von tierähnlichen Formen heraufentwickelt, bis er eine Art von Übertier wird, das die verschiedenen tierischen Gestalten zusammenfaßt. In diesem Übertier kann sich nun ein Wesen ganz anderer Art als es die gewöhnlichen Engelwesen sind, einleben, ein ahrimanisches Wesen. Und gerade in derselben Zeit, in der zur Tradition abglimmt das Wesen der uralten Weisheit, in der Zeit wird immer mehr und mehr dieser Mensch mächtig, der nun an seine tierische Organisation heranzieht das Verstandeswesen. Und so sehen wir, wie vom 8. vorchristlichen Jahrhundert ab der Mensch zunächst langsam, dann immer weiter und weiter sich heraufentwickelt, indem aus seinem Inneren heraufsprießt eine Art von Übertierwesen, das ahrimanischer Art ist, und das ihn jetzt auch von der anderen Seite her durchseelt.

[ 23 ] Dieses Wesen, das sich im Menschen gewissermaßen mit dem luziferischen Wesen trifft, dieses Wesen ist, ich möchte sagen, das andere, das den Menschen von seiner reinen Bahn abzubringen trachtet. Man könnte sagen, die luziferischen Wesen sind Zorneswesen, die den Menschen beseelen, aber um ihn eigentlich auf der Erde nicht froh werden zu lassen und ihn immer von der Erde wegzuziehen, um ihn gewissermaßen immerfort ins Übermenschliche hinaufzuziehen. Sie möchten ihn viel mehr als einen Engel haben, der nicht in die niederen Funktionen des physischen Organismus verfällt. Die luziferischen Wesen haben einen argen Zorn auf den auf zwei Beinen auf der Erde herumgehenden Menschen, der mit der Erde durch seine niederen Funktionen verbunden ist; alles Tierischen möchten diese Wesenheiten den Menschen entkleiden, und sie möchten ihn zum Beispiel jetzt in dieser Epoche seines Daseins nicht gern wiederum herunterlassen zur physischen Verkörperung, sie möchten ihn oben erhalten in dem Leben, das zwischen Tod und neuer Geburt verfließt. Dagegen möchte man die anderen, die ahrimanischen Wesenheiten, Schmerzenswesen nennen. Denn eigentlich streben sie nach der menschlichen Gestaltung hin, können sie aber für sich nicht erreichen. Es ist ein furchtbarer Schmerz, den im Grunde genommen diese ahrimanischen Wesen durchmachen. Es ist so, wie wenn das Tier in sich dunkel fühlen würde: Du solltest dich aufrichten, du solltest ein Mensch sein — wie wenn es alles in sich zerreißen möchte. Diesen furchtbaren Schmerz, ihn fühlen eigentlich die ahrimanischen Wesen. Und er kann ihnen nur gelindert werden, wenn sie herankommen an den Menschen und den Verstand erfassen. Da kühlt der Verstand diesen Schmerz ab. Daher verbeißen sie sich in den menschlichen Verstand, krallen sich gewissermaßen mit ihrem ganzen Wesen in ihn ein, knochen sich ein. Das ahrimanische Wesen hat so etwas wie das sich schmerzvolle Durchdringen mit dem menschlichen Verstand. Es möchte sich das ahrimanische Wesen mit dem Menschen vereinen, um zu Verstand zu kommen.

[ 24 ] Es ist also der Mensch der Kampfplatz zwischen dem Luziferischen und dem Ahrimanischen. Es ist so, daß man sagen kann: Das Luziferische hat die Hand im Spiele bei allem Künstlerischen, bei allem Abstrakt-Theologischen. Das Ahrimanische, das ist etwas wie aus der materiellen Welt Heraufkommendes, durch das Tierreich Durchgegangenes, das schmerzvoll hinstrebt nach dem Menschen, das den Verstand ergreifen will, das aber zurückgestoßen wird im Menschen von dem übermenschlichen Wesen, das immer zurückprallt, aber sich mitnehmen möchte den Verstand. Es ist etwas, was immer wieder und wieder in den Menschen herein will und den Menschen halten möchte beim bloßen Verstande, ihn nicht hinaufkommen lassen möchte bis zur Imagination, Inspiration, weil es das Menschenwesen zur Linderung seiner Qual bei sich behalten möchte.

[ 25 ] Alles das, was in der Menschheit sich seit der neueren ahrimanischen Zeit gebildet hat, vorzugsweise als materialistische Wissenschaft, als Wissenschaft, die von diesem sich im Menschen abkühlenden Schmerz des materiellen Daseins kommt, das ist ahrimanischer Natur. Und wir sehen die materialistische Wissenschaft heraufkommen. Der Mensch bildet sie aus. Indem der Mensch sie in sich hegt, verbindet sich Ahriman in ihm mit seiner Wissenschaft. Und so wie insbesondere Luzifer seine Hand im Spiele hat bei dem Künstlerischen, so hat Ahriman seine Hand im Spiele bei dem Ausbilden des Mechanischen, Technischen, dessen, was den Verstand wegziehen möchte vom Menschen, was ihn in die Maschine, sei es in das mechanische Werkzeug, sei es in die Maschinerie des Staatswesens hineinziehen möchte. Nur dadurch ist im wesentlichen möglich geworden, was da in der neueren Menschheit lebt, was da heraufgezogen ist insbesondere seit der Renaissancezeit. Man möchte sagen: Während der Renaissancezeit ist das luziferische Wirken in eine Art von Sackgasse gekommen; das ahrimanische Wirken, das hat sich jenseits der Wand dieser Sackgasse dann angesetzt. Und wir sehen das ganze Treiben, welches seit der Renaissancezeit da ist; das Hintreiben nach Mechanismus, nach geistloser Wissenschaft, sehen wir mit dem ahrimanischen Charakter ablaufen.

[ 26 ] Das einzige nun, was möglich ist hineinzubringen in das, was seit der Renaissancezeit heraufgezogen ist, ist die Christus-Auffassung. Was in der neueren Zeit als materialistische Wissenschaft, als industrielle Technik heraufgezogen ist, ist durchaus ahrimanischer Natur, würde, wenn es sich verbreiten könnte ohne Christus-Auffassung, den Menschen an die Erde fesseln. Der Mensch würde nicht hinaufkommen zum Jupiterdasein. Bringen wir aber die Christus- Auffassung, bringen wir ein neues geistiges Leben, bringen wir neuerdings Imagination, Inspiration, Intuition in dasjenige, was nur Erkenntnis der äußeren Welt ist, dann erlösen wir das ahrimanische Wesen. Wie diese Erlösung bildhaft vorgestellt werden kann, ich habe es ja in meinen Mysteriendramen von den mannigfaltigsten Seiten aus dargestellt. Aber es würde ein Überwinden des Menschen durch Ahriman sein, wenn die Christus-Auffassung nicht als eine wirklich durchgeistigte Auffassung, enttheologisiert, sich weiter gestalten könnte. Die materialistische Wissenschaft, der äußere industrielle Mechanismus würden den Menschen dem Erdentod überliefern, das heißt, eine ganz andere Welt zimmern, in der der Mensch mehr oder weniger wie ein Petrifikat fortleben würde zur Erbauung der ahrimanischen Wesenheiten, wenn nicht die Christus-Auffassung das moderne materialistische, das moderne mechanische Wesen wiederum in geistiger Art durchziehen würde.

[ 27 ] Wir können also sagen: Luzifer hat seine Hand im Spiele bei allem traditionell Theologischen, bei allem ins Manierhafte, Steife ausartenden Künstlerischen, bei allem Renaissanceartigen; während Ahriman seine Hand im Spiele hat bei allem, was nur äußerliche geistlose Naturwissenschaft ist, die in der Natur nicht den Geist entdecken kann, und bei allem, was äußerlicher Mechanismus im menschlichen Tun ist. Die luziferischen Engelwesen, die sich aus dem traditionellen Leben durchaus auch jetzt noch gerettet haben bis in die Gegenwart, sie haben alles Interesse daran, den Menschen eigentlich abzuhalten vom Tun. Sie möchten den Menschen wenigstens beim inneren Seelenleben erhalten. Der Mensch ist eine Persönlichkeit geworden. Aber diese Engelwesen möchten den Menschen nicht ausströmen lassen in seinen Taten in das Erlebnis, in die Offenbarung seiner Willensimpulse. Sie möchten ihn in innerlicher Beschaulichkeit erhalten. Sie verführen ihn zur Mystik, sie verführen ihn zur falschen Theosophie. Sie verführen ihn dazu, ein bloß innerliches beschauliches Leben zu führen, zu betrachten, statt zu handeln. Sie machen ihn zu einem Sinnierer, der am liebsten den ganzen Tag sitzen möchte und spinnen möchte über allerlei Welträtselfragen, der aber das, was in seinem Geiste lebt, nicht übertragen möchte in die äußere Wirklichkeit. Sie möchten durch rein äußere Beobachtung entstehen lassen, was äußere Wissenschaft ist. Sie lassen gut entstehen solch eine Wissenschaft wie die des Paters Secch:, der ein ausgezeichneter Astrophysiker war, deshalb, weil er beobachten konnte mit Mikroskop und Teleskop, weil er das verzeichnen konnte, und nur daneben etwas hatte, was damit gar nicht zusammenhing: das, was ihm eingegeben war von luziferischen Wesen als eine hohe überirdisch-übermenschliche Weisheit. Indem die luziferischen Wesen diese übermenschlich-überirdische Weisheit pflegen, entreißen sie das Seelisch-Geistige des Menschen dem Erdendasein. Dann verfällt einfach das, was noch so hohe äußere materialistische Wissenschaft ist; das verfällt, das hat keinen inneren Bestand. Es ist ja nicht von realer Geistigkeit durchzogen. Das interessiert sie nicht weiter.

[ 28 ] Ebenso möchten diese luziferischen Wesenheiten die Kunst möglichst lebenslos, geistlos in dem Sinne haben, daß in die Form nicht Geist einzieht. Sie möchten immer nur Renaissance haben, das, was in alten Zeiten gelebt hat. Sie geben dem Menschen einen Haß ein gegen jede neue Stilform, die aus dem modernen Menschlichen wirklich hervorgehen kann. Sie möchten die alten Stilformen fortpflanzen, weil diese alten Stilformen noch dem Unirdischen, Überirdischen entlehnt sind.

[ 29 ] Das ahrimanische Wesen wiederum möchte es überhaupt nicht zur Vergeistigung, nicht zum Stil kommen lassen, möchte am liebsten nur ganz prosaische Bauten, Nützlichkeitsbauten zum Beispiel aufführen, möchte alles mechanisieren, alles nur in den Dienst des Industriellen stellen, möchte dem Menschen eingeben, nicht zu schätzen noch irgendeine Handarbeit als Kunstgewerbe, sondern möchte nur Modelle liefern, die dann maschinell in unendlichen Exemplaren nachgebildet werden so, wie sich Ahriman selbst in einer unermeßlich großen Zahl von Exemplaren durch das Geheimnis der Zahl in vielen Menschen offenbaren kann.

[ 30 ] Der Mensch steht eigentlich in der Gegenwart ganz in diesem Kampfe drinnen. Nur wenn er sich wirklich besinnt auf das, was ihm die echte Christus-Gabe sein kann: eine der heutigen Zeit angemessene anthroposophische Geist-Erkenntnis und Geistesanschauung, wenn er sich darauf besinnt, findet er den Weg durch Innehalten der Gleichgewichtslage zwischen dem Luziferischen und dem Ahrimanischen. Er muß sozusagen mit dem Ahrimanischen kämpfen, denn er würde ja sonst dem Luziferischen verfallen müssen. Er darf aber nicht, ohne wachsam zu sein, sich den Strömen Ahrimans hingeben, denn dadurch würde er in eine vollständig mechanische Weltenordnung hineinfallen. Die luziferischen Wesen möchten den Menschen von jeglichem Tun abhalten, ihn zum Sinnierer, zum Mystiker machen, der nach und nach nichts mehr übrig hat für das Erdendasein und deshalb auch dem Erdendasein entzogen werden kann. Die ahrimanischen Wesenheiten möchten den Menschen ganz beim Erdendasein erhalten. Daher möchten sie alles mechanisieren, das heißt, hinunterdrücken ins Mineralreich. Sie würden dadurch die Erde in ihrem Sinne umgestalten, sie nicht hinüberkommen lassen zu dem Jupiterdasein. Sie haben allerdings das Bestreben, dem Menschen nicht das Tun zu rauben, ihn vielmehr so stark tun, wirken, handeln zu lassen, als der Mensch nur kann, aber es soll alles schablonenmäßig verlaufen, es soll alles programmmäßig verlaufen. Ahriman ist der große Enthusiast für alles Programmäßige. Er ist der Inspirator für das ewige Statutenmachen. Wenn Ahriman irgendwo in einem Komitee sieht, wie da Statuten gemacht werden, dann ist er in seinem eigentlichen Elemente: Erstens, zweitens, drittens —, erstens soll das geschehen, zweitens soll das geschehen, drittens hat dieses Mitglied diese Rechte, viertens sollte jenes Mitglied das oder jenes tun. Natürlich fällt es dann dem Mitglied nicht ein, diese Rechte zu respektieren, oder das, was dasteht, irgendwie zu tun. Aber darauf kommt es nicht an zunächst. Wenn die Statuten abgefaßt sind, da kommt es darauf an, den ahrimanischen Geist zu pflegen. Man kann dann hinweisen auf Paragraph soundsoviel.

[ 31 ] Aber zum Tun dennoch anregen möchte Ahriman, nur soll alles ablaufen in dem schablonenmäßig programmatischen Sinne. Alles soll in Paragraphen gezwängt sein. Der Mensch soll gewissermaßen jeden Morgen auf seiner Bettdecke finden ein Verzeichnis dessen, was er den Tag über zu tun hat, und das soll er mechanisch ausführen, indem er gewissermaßen nur mit den Beinen denkt, nicht mit dem Kopfe. Während Luzifer das Bestreben hat, den Menschen mit dem Kopf denken zu machen und in den Kopf das Herz zu gießen, ist Ahriman bestrebt, den Menschen nur mit den Beinen denken zu machen, alles in die Beine hineinzugießen.

[ 32 ] In diesem Kampfe steht der Mensch schon drinnen; und das, was ich vielleicht in einer mehr bildhaften Form ausspreche, das ist schon im Grunde genommen Inhalt unserer Kultur. Da sehen wir auf der einen Seite diejenigen Menschen, die es als ihr Ideal ansehen, mit untergelegten Beinen wie eine Buddha-Statue sich zum Allerhöchsten sinnierend erheben zu können, in vollständiger Beinlosigkeit, mit einem Aufschwellen des Kopfes in die mystischen Abgründe sich hineinvertiefend. Da sehen wir auf der anderen Seite die abendländischen Menschen, die im Grunde genommen, indem sie gar nicht wissen, wie schnell sie von einem Büro zum anderen, von einem Geschäft zum anderen mit ihren Beinen pendeln müssen, auf uns den Eindruck machen, daß sie eigentlich ganz unnötig auf ihren Schultern auch noch einen Kopf tragen, der ja im Grunde genommen gar nicht dabei ist bei dem, was sie tun. Und es sind das schon die beiden Extreme der Menschheit in der gegenwärtigen Zeit: die einsamen Sinnierer mit zugemachten Augen, damit sie auch das, was sie selber tun, nicht sehen können, und diejenigen, die eigentlich Augen nicht brauchten, weil sie immer an den Beinen etwas haben wie Leinen, Zugleinen, und am Ende der Zugleinen ist Paragraph soundsoviel, und so werden sie wie das Glied eines Mechanismus durch die Welt gezogen.

[ 33 ] Wir sehen zwar, wie sich zuweilen der moderne Mensch gegen den Ahrimanismus aufbäumt, wie er schimpft gegen die Bürokratie, die ja reiner Ahrimanismus ist, wie er gegen die Schablonisierung des Unterrichtes und so weiter sich aufbäumt — aber in der Regel nur, um etwas tiefer noch in das hineinzufallen, aus dem er heraus möchte.

[ 34 ] Heraus aus alldem kann doch nur führen ein Hinlenken der ganzen Gesinnung, der ganzen Seelenverfassung des Menschen zum Geist-Erkennen, zu demjenigen, was wiederum das Vorstellungswesen durchdringt mit realer Geistigkeit, so daß der reale Geist den ganzen Menschen ergreift, nicht bloß den Kopf. Und indem er den ganzen Menschen ergreift, kann er auch das ahrimanische Wesen überwinden, und indem er es überwindet, erlöst er es. Es soll gar nichts gesagt werden gegen das ahrimanische Wesen. Es soll nicht etwa getadelt werden, was sich im Registrieren und im Statutenmachen und im Paragraphenmachen berechtigt auslebt. Aber durchgeistigt soll das alles werden.

[ 35 ] Wir können ja doch kaum anders in der neueren Zeit, als daß wir ahrimanische Künste treiben, daß wir zum Beispiel stenographieren, daß wir mit der Schreibmaschine schreiben. Das alles sind ja Ahrimanisierungen unserer Kultur im höchsten Maße. Aber indem wir Geistigkeit in unsere Kultur hineinbringen, können wir selbst das, was in einer so bedenklichen Weise ahrimanischer Einfluß ist wie das Stenographieren oder das Schreibmaschinenschreiben, in die Sphäre der Geistigkeit heraufheben, so daß wir Ahriman erlösen. Es ist ja ein solches nur durch eine volle Besonnenheit über das Geistesleben möglich. Derjenige, der heute in materialistischer Gesinnung lebt und stenographiert oder gar Schreibmaschine schreibt, der gerät tief hinein in das ahrimanische Element. Sie sehen, es soll nicht einer Reaktion das Wort geredet werden, es soll nicht verpönt werden die Dämonologie, die da heraufgezogen ist; aber die Dämonen selbst sollen erlöst werden.

[ 36 ] Das kann sich auch durchaus im einzelnen zeigen. Im Grunde genommen kann man sagen: Was da an ahrimanischen Elementen Platz gegriffen hat in der neueren Zivilisation, das treibt eigentlich nur aus einer gewissen Vorliebe die ahrimanischen Künste. Denn das, was von dieser ahrimanischen Kultur stenographiert oder schreibmaschinengeschrieben wird, das könnte auch ungeschrieben bleiben. Man weiß in der Regel ohnedies schon, was es enthält. Man braucht es im Grunde genommen gar nicht zu fixieren. Der Inhalt ist gleichgültig. Es ist nur die ahrimanische Kunst, die da in Betracht kommt, von einer gewissen Bedeutung. Aber für dasjenige, was geisteswissenschaftlich heraufkommt, für das wird man brauchen können die genaue Fixierung, weil es notwendig ist, sich in einer exakten, genauen Weise auszusprechen. Und dann wird gerade das Ahrimanische dem Geistigen wesentliche Dienste leisten können. So wird man das im einzelnen übersehen.

[ 37 ] Von ganz besonderer Bedeutung wird aber sein, daß die moderne Geisteswissenschaft die einzelnen menschlichen Wissenschaften durchdringt, daß sie von den geistlosen Naturwissenschaften zu einer wirklichen einheitlichen Geisteswissenschaft kommt, daß die einzelnen Naturwissenschaften, ich möchte sagen, Kapitel sind einer einheitlichen Geisteswissenschaft. Dadurch werden sie entahrimanisiert, und man kommt allmählich durch den richtigen Betrieb der Einzelheiten in diejenige Strömung hinein, die ich heute aus dem luziferisch-ahrimanischen Gegensatze vor Ihnen entwickeln mußte.

[ 38 ] Glauben Sie nicht, daß es gleichgültig ist, in solche Einzelheiten hineinzuweisen, wie ich das heute getan habe. Es ist schon gut, wenn man sich ein wenig bekannt macht durch solche Bilder, wie ich sie gebraucht habe, mit den heute lebenden luziferischen Menschen mit den untergeschlagenen Buddha-Beinen, und den ahrimanischen Menschen, die als «Hansdampf auf allen Straßen» geschäftig von Kontor zu Kontor laufen, und die eigentlich zu dieser Geschäftigkeit ihren Kopf gar nicht brauchten.

[ 39 ] Es ist vielleicht manchmal angenehmer, diese Dinge in Abstraktionen zu hören als in den konkreten Bildern, aber moderne Geisteswissenschaft, anthroposophische Geisteswissenschaft hat die Aufgabe, ins unmittelbare Leben hineinzuweisen, das unmittelbare Leben auch überall beim rechten Namen zu nennen. Nur dadurch kann eigentlich eine völlig gesunde, konkret zutreffende Anschauung und Seelenverfassung heraufkommen.

[ 40 ] Das ist es, was ich heute hinzufügen wollte zu den Betrachtungen der letzten Wochen. Das nächste Mal werden wir wiederum versuchen, von einer anderen Seite an die Betrachtung des Menschen heranzukommen.

Fourteenth Lecture

[ 1 ] To expand on the remarks I have made here recently, it would be good to first look back at human development to times when what we now call knowledge had a completely different character. We have already spoken about this different character of human knowledge in earlier times. But with what we have gained in the last lectures here, we will be able to shed some light on what is already known.

[ 2 ] Human knowledge has actually taken on a completely different character than it had earlier, at the time when Greek and Roman culture entered history. What preceded Greek and Roman civilization in the East and in Africa in terms of knowledge was of a completely different nature than what was then inaugurated in a magnificent way by the Greeks, abstracted by the Romans, and then led more and more into materialism in recent times. It was around the beginning of the 8th century BC that knowledge took on the character that it still has today, albeit with significant modifications. Until now, we have been able to characterize older knowledge mainly by saying that it was a kind of instinctive vision. It was not a life of cognition in concepts, it was a life of cognition in images, which are not completely similar to our dream images, because they referred to spiritual realities, but which nevertheless lived in the soul, not with the certainty of our present world of concepts, but which were present in consciousness more in the form of passing images.

[ 3 ] However, this knowledge did not actually refer to what is the content of our knowledge today, but rather to those worlds from which human beings emerged as they developed out of the primordial worlds, in which they were still so contained that they were hardly separated from them. During the Saturn, Sun, and Moon evolutions, man was still completely a member of the whole rest of the world. But even during the earlier Earth evolution, the personality was not yet separated from the general world content. Human beings felt themselves to be, in a sense, inside the general world content. As soon as human beings depart from their actual intellectual knowledge, from head knowledge, and do something like certain Oriental schools still do, seeking to attain a kind of knowledge through breathing processes, then this sharp separation from the world immediately ceases to exist. At the moment when people today perform the antiquated yoga exercises that still exist, they immediately feel their personality being diminished and suppressed; they feel themselves, I would say, like a breath of the world.

[ 4 ] Such was the nature of knowledge in those earlier times, when human beings were able to interpret their own physical inner being through this pictorial knowledge — in the sense I explained yesterday. Yesterday we drew attention to how human beings today take in their surroundings, how they then preserve them as ideas, how this then becomes their inner life, and how they can, as it were, represent a picture of their world between birth and the present moment from this inner life. Thus, what we carry within us as organs, as brain, lungs, liver, represents the entire content of the world. Just as one can interpret a process one has experienced from a memory image, just as one carries this process within oneself as an image, so one carries the whole world within oneself in one's inner organs, in one's lungs, heart, and so on. And the ancient wisdom consisted in interpreting these individual organs, in relating them to the whole content of the world.

[ 5 ] Essentially, it was the older understanding, which persisted until the 9th century BC, that interpreted the world from the inner physical being of the human being, the physical-etheric being of the human being — of course, the inner being was seen differently than it is seen by today's anatomists and physiologists. Each individual inner organ was related to something in the outer world, but it was this inner organ that was experienced from within. The structure of the brain was thus experienced in powerful images, and these images were related back to the entire sphere of the heavens, so that through this ancient knowledge, the structure of the brain as suggested in atavistic imagination gave rise to a conception of the entire sphere of the heavens. And what is contained in ancient wisdom about the world has essentially arisen from such an interpretation of the inner human being.

[ 6 ] Now, however, one cannot even say that what lived there as knowledge was true human knowledge. True human knowledge, even if it is by no means to be dry, pure intellectualism, as it is often regarded today, is nevertheless inconceivable without intelligence. But that ancient wisdom was entirely without intelligence brought about by human beings, so that one cannot even say that this ancient wisdom was actual human knowledge. Human beings, in a sense, only participated in a knowledge that actually belonged to other beings within them. And these were beings that belonged to the hierarchy of the Angeloi. Such an Angelos animated human beings, and it was actually he who possessed this ancient knowledge. Human beings only participated in it. They looked, as it were, into the inner being of this Angelos. Therefore, they participated in what the angelos recognized. Therefore, the possessor of that ancient wisdom also had a very vague idea of how they came to their insights. They simply said to themselves: This is inspiration, it is there — because they themselves did not bring about this insight, because the angelic being within them brought about this insight.

[ 7 ] But this angelic being was not like those we have assumed in these past days to be the normal angelic beings that accompany human beings through their various earthly lives. Rather, this angelic being had a Luciferic character. It was, in a sense, with its whole being, with its whole disposition, left behind at an earlier stage of development, at the stage of lunar evolution. So one can say that beings who should have gone through their normal human stage during the lunar evolution, Luciferic beings, animated or permeated human beings with the older wisdom, and human beings participated in what this angelic being experienced within them. This was what human beings received as such wisdom, an extraordinarily high level of knowledge. It was the knowledge that had been granted to the angelic beings as a very complete form during the lunar evolution, but it was not knowledge that was actually suitable for human beings, who did not know what to do with it on Earth. On Earth, human beings behaved more or less instinctively; I would say they behaved like higher animals. And then this high wisdom shone into this higher animal being, so to speak, this high wisdom that faded as the 8th century BC dawned.

[ 8 ] This wisdom, which in the sense indicated had a thoroughly Luciferic character, actually extended only to everything that allowed humans to recognize themselves as members of extraterrestrial worlds. With their knowledge, humans had not yet really entered the Earth, so to speak. He still felt himself to be in higher spheres with his wisdom, and on Earth he acted instinctively.[9] Then more and more of what could arise from the intellectual or emotional soul began to emerge. Man began to activate his intellect within himself.

[ 9 ] Man began to develop concepts. Greek culture was distinguished by the fact that it actually still possessed, I would say, the wisdom of the angels from ancient times, but it worked through it with human concepts. And wisdom such as that of Plato makes such a great impression on us precisely because Plato already possessed the subjective ability to develop the world of concepts and ideas, while at the same time the ancient instinctive wisdom shone through this development. This is why Plato's writings combine in such a wonderful way the highest wisdom with what already lives in the elements of the human personality. And when one considers Plato's entire state of mind, one cannot imagine that he could have written his books of wisdom in any other form than that of dialogue, for the simple reason that he clearly sensed what older people felt in an undefined way. Older people said to themselves: Wisdom is simply there, it grasps me, it shines into me. Plato found himself in a kind of dialogue with the being that brought wisdom into him. As in dialogue, he experienced wisdom himself, which is why he preferred to express it in dialogue.

[ 10 ] But then this conceptual activity quickly intensified. And in Aristotle we already see this knowledge confronting us in the form of a theoretical fabric.

[ 1 ] Then, in the fourth post-Atlantean period, a certain cultural element gains more and more influence, which we can describe by saying: People felt that an ancient wisdom had once permeated the soul. They felt that superhuman beings had descended upon them and brought wisdom. But they also felt how this wisdom became abstract. They could no longer grasp it; what had once flowed down from spiritual worlds now flowed away from them.

[ 12 ] This activity of the human intellect, which then shaped everything into abstractions, is found particularly in Roman culture. Roman culture developed a dry, abstract nature, a nature alien to images, a nature that wanted to live in the forms of the intellect. While the Greeks still gave us the feeling that the figures of the gods, that is, what lay at the foundation of the world and nature as something elemental, had an inner life, the Roman gods are abstractions, have a rigid, stiff conceptual character. The logical nature takes precedence over the earlier imaginative nature that was still so widespread in Greece. Everything the Romans still had in the way of imagination came from Greece. The Romans added the element of prose, the element of logic, and then developed it further into romanticism in later times, which is why the Latin language took on that logical character through which it had such a formative influence on culture for so long.

[ 13 ] But one thing has been preserved, which made Greek culture even more vibrant and Roman culture somewhat more lifeless, but which then spread into the post-Christian centuries, into the Middle Ages, and even to the dawn of modern times: the tradition of ancient wisdom has been passed on. And more than people today think, the tradition of this ancient wisdom has been passed on.

[ 14 ] It was not possible to grasp with the intellect what was spreading around us for the senses. People sought to grasp the traditional with the intellect. But in doing so, what had previously been an inner, life-giving Luciferic element took on an even outer, Ahrimanic character. But that is the mask. In truth, it is a Luciferic element that propagates itself through tradition. And what we see propagating itself from the time of the Roman Empire through the following centuries of Romanism, which then becomes very strongly imbued with the Germanic element, but which nevertheless preserves itself in tradition, is essentially a Luciferic element. The Luciferic element continues to work. Of course, as it flows down into the realm of thought, it is stripped of its original character. It dissolves into thought forms. In the Latin language, I would say that a Luciferic element lives on in an Ahrimanic way.

[ 15 ] This element is still very much alive in Greek art. Then it becomes more or less rigid, and it is interesting to trace how it continues into theology, which is a doctrine of supersensible worlds, but which does not itself have supersensible worlds, only has them according to tradition. And thus arises that spiritual current which is essentially a kind of Luciferic current and which carries the old view of the supersensible over into theology.

[ 16 ] Christianity itself is drawn into the meshes of this theology. Christianity is theologized. Just as logization occurs in the Roman language, so theologization occurs with Christianity. But the actual life-giving element of Christianity is lost in a Luciferic element that wears an Ahrimanic mask. Living Christianity becomes a theologizing cultural current. Underneath, the actual personal element is always at work, but still in an instinctive way. It cannot yet fully unite with what comes from above. And it is particularly interesting to observe this in its most striking phase, the Renaissance. Here we see a high theology that has the concepts and ideas of the supersensible, but no longer has the vision. Traditionally, everything is basically present at the time of the Renaissance. What is preserved in Romanism in theological form is ancient wisdom, but brought down into the realm of imagination. It lives on in the Luciferic realm of ideas.

[ 17 ] It is wonderful what can still be seen today in such theological elements when one looks at Raphael's murals in Rome, what actually lives in theological elements in that painting called the Disputa. Deep wisdom that lives on more or less in words, that no longer harbors any views, but which is precisely the deepest wisdom for those who can connect it with their views.

[ 18 ] We also admire the theology that lives in Dante's Divine Comedy, but at the same time we know that although Dante did indeed acquire certain views from his teacher Brunetto Latini — I have explained this once before —, the vast majority of the traditional, theological element has a strong Luciferic influence. And on the other hand, we see how those beings who carry such ancient wisdom into the theological element are the same beings who, after having previously animated Greek art, now stiffen it, but still carry it into Renaissance art through tradition. the theological element, are now also those who, after having previously animated Greek art, make it more rigid, but nevertheless carry it into Renaissance art through tradition, so that Goethe sees Greek art resurrected in his spirit by seeing this Greek art again in Renaissance art.

[ 19 ] It must be said: there is definitely a strong Luciferic element living in theology, living in art as it has been handed down to us from ancient times, that art which, in order to be artistic, must seek above all the supernatural, which cannot come down completely to the human being. Where it does descend, it appears to us as if it has been suddenly lowered into the instinctive. For we see the life of the Renaissance itself as having, in a sense, heaven within it, of which it has ideas, no longer perceptions, ideas that it can even enliven artistically in a wonderful way; but beneath this we see an instinctive degeneration of Renaissance life developing. It is, after all, a magnificent but sometimes frightening spectacle of world history how a Pope Alexander VI or even Leo X, are, on the one hand, learned, thoroughly educated men, how they carry the highest of supernatural worlds in their ideas, but how, as Renaissance men, they cannot raise what is human personality to this spiritual height, how it instinctively degenerates down below. And so we see these terrifying creatures, the Renaissance men, on the one hand developing something like a higher animal life, and above them we see spreading, bearing the Luciferic character, the heaven that has been brought to people in a theology that is wonderful on the one hand and thoroughly Luciferic on the other.

[ 20 ] But this brings us to the time when other powers took hold of human development, powers other than these older, angelic beings.

[ 21 ] Human beings stand in the middle between the realm of the angeloi and the realm of animals. In earlier times, their outer physical form was very animal-like, but it was nevertheless animated by what I have just described to you. Without any idea of what is true in this realm, geologists and paleontologists today dig up human remains from ancient times with receding foreheads and animal-like human forms, believing that this brings humans closer to animals. In terms of external physical form, this is entirely justified, but the more animal-like forms we find in ancient times, the more these animal forms are imbued with ancient wisdom. And when these animal-like forms were excavated a few years ago in certain parts of Europe and today's geology and paleontology can only say: These are humans with low skulls, receding foreheads, protruding eyebrows, eye sockets — if one knows the truth in this field, one must say: This human being, who today may look so animal-like, who appears to the external paleontologist as a higher-developed ape, was nevertheless imbued with ancient wisdom, which had a different nature within him. He only participated in it.

[ 22 ] So we can say that in ancient times, human beings were filled with something superhuman. They grew more and more toward this as they developed from animal-like forms until they became a kind of super-animal that combined the various animal forms. In this super-animal, a being of a completely different nature than the ordinary angelic beings can now take up residence, an Ahrimanic being. And precisely at the same time when the essence of ancient wisdom is fading into tradition, this human being becomes more and more powerful, drawing the intellectual being closer to his animal organization. And so we see how, from the eighth century BC onwards, human beings first slowly, then more and more rapidly, develop upwards, as a kind of super-animal being of an Ahrimanic nature springs up from within them and now also animates them from the other side.

[ 23 ] This being, which in a sense meets the Luciferic being in the human being, is, I would say, the other being that seeks to lead the human being away from his pure path. One could say that the Luciferic beings are beings of wrath that animate human beings, but not in order to make them happy on earth, rather to constantly draw them away from the earth, to continually pull them up into the superhuman realm, so to speak. They would much rather have them as angels who do not fall into the lower functions of the physical organism. The Luciferic beings have a terrible anger toward human beings walking around on two legs on Earth, connected to the Earth through their lower functions; these beings want to strip human beings of everything animal, and they do not want to let them descend again into physical embodiment, for example, in this epoch of their existence; they want to keep them up in the life that flows between death and new birth. In contrast, the other beings, the Ahrimanic beings, might be called beings of pain. For they actually strive toward human form, but cannot attain it for themselves. It is a terrible pain that these Ahrimanic beings undergo. It is as if an animal were to feel darkly within itself: You should stand up, you should be a human being — as if it wanted to tear itself apart. This terrible pain is what the Ahrimanic beings actually feel. And it can only be alleviated if they come into contact with human beings and grasp the intellect. The intellect cools this pain. That is why they cling to the human intellect, clawing into it with their whole being, digging themselves in. The Ahrimanic being experiences something like a painful penetration of the human intellect. The Ahrimanic being wants to unite with the human being in order to attain intellect.

[ 24 ] It is therefore the human being who is the battleground between the Luciferic and the Ahrimanic. It is so that one can say: the Luciferic has a hand in everything artistic, in everything abstract and theological. The Ahrimanic is something that arises from the material world, that has passed through the animal kingdom, that strives painfully toward human beings, that wants to seize the intellect, but is repelled in human beings by the superhuman being, which always rebounds but wants to take the intellect with it. It is something that wants to enter human beings again and again and keep them at the level of pure intellect, not allowing them to rise to imagination and inspiration, because it wants to keep human beings with it in order to alleviate its own torment.

[ 25 ] Everything that has formed in humanity since the more recent Ahrimanic era, primarily as materialistic science, as science that comes from this cooling pain of material existence within human beings, is of an Ahrimanic nature. And we see materialistic science rising up. Human beings form it. By cherishing it within themselves, Ahriman connects with them through their science. And just as Lucifer has his hand in the arts, so Ahriman has his hand in the development of the mechanical and technical, in everything that wants to draw the intellect away from human beings and draw them into the machine, whether it be the mechanical tool or the machinery of the state. Only in this way has it essentially become possible for what lives in the newer humanity, what has been drawn up especially since the Renaissance, to come into being. One might say: during the Renaissance, the Luciferic activity came to a kind of dead end; the Ahrimanic activity then set in beyond the wall of this dead end. And we see all the activity that has been going on since the Renaissance; the drive toward mechanism, toward spiritless science, we see unfolding with the Ahrimanic character.

[ 26 ] The only thing that can now be brought into what has arisen since the Renaissance is the Christ concept. What has arisen in recent times as materialistic science and industrial technology is entirely of an Ahrimanic nature and, if it were able to spread without the Christ concept, would bind human beings to the earth. Human beings would not be able to ascend to the Jupiter existence. But if we bring in the Christ concept, if we bring in a new spiritual life, if we bring imagination, inspiration, and intuition into what is only knowledge of the outer world, then we redeem the Ahrimanic being. I have depicted how this redemption can be imagined in my Mystery Dramas from many different angles. But it would be a victory for Ahriman over humanity if the Christ concept could not develop further as a truly spiritualized, de-theologized concept. Materialistic science and the external industrial mechanism would deliver humanity to earthly death, that is, they would construct a completely different world in which humanity would continue to exist more or less as a petrified entity for the edification of the Ahrimanic beings, if the Christ concept did not in turn permeate the modern materialistic, modern mechanical essence in a spiritual way.

[ 27 ] We can therefore say: Lucifer has his hand in everything traditional in theology, in everything artistic that degenerates into mannerism and rigidity, in everything Renaissance-like; while Ahriman has his hand in everything that is merely external, spiritless natural science, which cannot discover the spirit in nature, and in everything that is external mechanism in human activity. The Luciferic angelic beings, who have managed to save themselves from traditional life even to the present day, have every interest in actually preventing human beings from acting. They want to keep human beings at least in their inner soul life. Human beings have become personalities. But these angelic beings do not want to let human beings pour out into their deeds, into experience, into the revelation of their will impulses. They want to keep them in inner contemplation. They seduce them into mysticism, they seduce them into false theosophy. They seduce them into leading a merely inner, contemplative life, into observing instead of acting. They turn them into thinkers who would prefer to sit around all day and ponder all kinds of world enigmas, but who do not want to transfer what lives in their minds into outer reality. They want to create what outer science is through purely outer observation. They allow a science such as that of Father Secchi to arise, who was an excellent astrophysicist because he could observe with a microscope and telescope, because he could record what he saw, and only had something else that was completely unrelated to this: that which was imparted to him by Luciferic beings as a high, super-earthly, superhuman wisdom. By cultivating this superhuman, super-earthly wisdom, the Luciferic beings snatch the soul-spiritual from human beings' earthly existence. Then what is still such a high external materialistic science simply decays; it decays because it has no inner substance. It is not permeated by real spirituality. That does not interest them any further.

[ 28 ] Similarly, these Luciferic beings want art to be as lifeless and spiritless as possible, in the sense that no spirit enters into the form. They always want only the Renaissance, what lived in ancient times. They instill in people a hatred of every new style that can truly emerge from modern humanity. They want to perpetuate the old styles because these old styles are still borrowed from the unearthly, the super-earthly.

[ 29 ] The Ahrimanic being, on the other hand, does not want to allow spiritualization or style to develop at all. It would prefer to build only very prosaic structures, such as functional buildings, and would like to mechanize everything, put everything at the service of industry, and would like to teach people not to value any kind of handicraft as an art, but would like only to supply models that can then be reproduced mechanically in infinite copies, just as Ahriman himself can reveal himself in an immeasurable number of copies through the mystery of numbers in many people.

[ 30 ] Human beings are actually completely caught up in this struggle in the present. Only when they truly reflect on what the genuine gift of Christ can be for them—an anthroposophical spiritual knowledge and spiritual outlook appropriate to the present age—only when they reflect on this will they find the way through by maintaining the balance between the Luciferic and the Ahrimanic. They must, so to speak, fight with the Ahrimanic, because otherwise they would fall prey to the Luciferic. But they must not, without being vigilant, surrender themselves to the currents of Ahriman, because then they would fall into a completely mechanical world order. The Luciferic beings want to prevent human beings from doing anything, to turn them into thinkers and mystics who gradually lose all interest in earthly existence and can therefore be removed from it. The Ahrimanic beings want to keep human beings entirely within earthly existence. That is why they want to mechanize everything, that is, to push it down into the mineral kingdom. In this way, they would transform the earth according to their own will and prevent it from passing over into the Jupiter existence. However, they do not seek to rob human beings of their activity, but rather to enable them to do, work, and act as much as human beings are capable of, but everything must proceed according to a template, according to a program. Ahriman is the great enthusiast for everything programmatic. He is the inspiration behind the eternal creation of statutes. When Ahriman sees statutes being created in a committee somewhere, he is in his element: first, second, third — first this must happen, second that must happen, third this member has these rights, fourth that member should do this or that. Of course, it doesn't occur to the member to respect these rights or to do what is written down. But that's not what matters at first. Once the statutes have been drafted, it is important to cultivate the Ahrimanic spirit. One can then refer to paragraph so-and-so.

[ 31 ] But Ahriman still wants to encourage action, only everything should proceed in a stereotypical, programmatic sense. Everything should be forced into paragraphs. Every morning, people should find a list on their bedspread of what they have to do that day, and they should carry it out mechanically, thinking only with their legs, so to speak, and not with their heads. While Lucifer strives to make people think with their heads and pour the heart into the head, Ahriman strives to make people think only with their legs, to pour everything into the legs.

[ 32 ] Human beings are already caught up in this struggle, and what I am perhaps expressing in a more pictorial form is, in essence, the content of our culture. On the one hand, we see those people who consider it their ideal to be able to rise up to the highest level, like a Buddha statue with their legs crossed, in complete leglessness, with their heads swelling and sinking into mystical abysses. On the other side, we see Western people who, basically, because they have no idea how fast they have to rush from one office to another, from one shop to another, give us the impression that they are actually carrying a head on their shoulders that is completely unnecessary, because it is not really involved in what they are doing. And these are already the two extremes of humanity in the present day: the lonely thinkers with their eyes closed so that they cannot see what they themselves are doing, and those who do not really need eyes because they always have something like leashes or tow ropes attached to their legs, and at the end of the tow ropes is paragraph so-and-so, and so they are pulled through the world like the links of a mechanism.

[ 33 ] We do see how modern man sometimes rebels against Ahrimanism, how he rails against bureaucracy, which is pure Ahrimanism, how he rebels against the standardization of education and so on — but usually only to fall even deeper into what he wants to escape.

[ 34 ] The only way out of all this is to turn the whole attitude, the whole soul state of human beings toward spiritual knowledge, toward that which in turn permeates the realm of ideas with real spirituality, so that the real spirit takes hold of the whole human being, not just the head. And by taking hold of the whole human being, it can also overcome the Ahrimanic being, and by overcoming it, it redeems it. Nothing should be said against the Ahrimanic being. There is no need to condemn what is legitimately expressed in registration, in the making of statutes and paragraphs. But all this must become spiritualized.

[ 35 ] In modern times, we can hardly do otherwise than practice Ahrimanic arts, for example, stenography or typing. All these are Ahrimanic influences on our culture in the highest degree. But by bringing spirituality into our culture, we can raise even things that are so seriously influenced by Ahriman, such as shorthand or typing, into the sphere of spirituality, thereby redeeming Ahriman. This is only possible through complete prudence in our spiritual life. Those who live today with a materialistic attitude and use shorthand or even type on a typewriter fall deeply into the Ahrimanic element. You see, it is not a question of advocating reaction, of condemning the demonology that has arisen; but the demons themselves must be redeemed.

[ 36 ] This can also be seen in detail. Basically, one can say that what has gained a foothold in the newer civilization as Ahrimanic elements actually drives the Ahrimanic arts out of a certain preference. For what is stenographed or typed by this Ahrimanic culture could just as well remain unwritten. As a rule, one already knows what it contains. There is basically no need to record it. The content is irrelevant. It is only the Ahrimanic art that is of any significance here. But for that which emerges from the spiritual sciences, precise recording will be necessary, because it is essential to express oneself in an exact and precise manner. And then it is precisely the Ahrimanic that will be able to render essential services to the spiritual. This is what is overlooked in the details.

[ 37 ] Of particular importance, however, will be that modern spiritual science penetrates the individual human sciences, that it moves from the spiritless natural sciences to a truly unified spiritual science, that the individual natural sciences are, I might say, chapters of a unified spiritual science. In this way they are de-Ahrimanized, and through the correct functioning of the details one gradually enters into that stream which I have had to develop before you today from the Luciferic-Ahrimanic opposition.

[ 38 ] Do not think that it is irrelevant to point out such details as I have done today. It is good to become a little familiar, through images such as I have used, with the Luciferic people living today with their Buddha legs tucked under them, and the Ahrimanic people who run busily from office to office as “Jack-of-all-trades,” and who do not really need their heads for this busyness.

[ 39 ] It is perhaps sometimes more pleasant to hear these things in abstractions than in concrete images, but modern spiritual science, anthroposophical spiritual science, has the task of pointing to immediate life, of calling immediate life by its proper name everywhere. Only in this way can a completely healthy, concretely accurate view and state of mind actually arise.

[ 40 ] That is what I wanted to add today to the reflections of the last few weeks. Next time, we will again try to approach the consideration of the human being from a different angle.