Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

Cosmosophy II
GA 208

4 November 1921, Dornach

Lecture VII

Having considered the way human beings relate to the cosmos in the form of the human organization, in levels of life and with regard to the contents of their inner life, let us today consider the life of the mind and spirit This will be in preparation for our subject for the next two days.

Remember how we considered the form of the human organism, relating the human organization to the fixed stars out in the cosmos. To consider the levels of human life, we had to look at our own planetary system. For the phenomena of the inner life we had to change our line of approach and relate the inner nature of human beings to their physical organization, which they owe to the fixed stars and the planetary system. Looking at form and life, we perceived the differences between head organization, chest organization, and metabolism and limbs as a third organization. We found that the inner life of sensory perception and of ideas comes into its own through the head organization, through nerves and senses. We found that the life of feeling comes to expression through the breathing and circulatory organization, and the life of will through the system of metabolism and limbs. For our study of the inner life, account had to be taken of the way the I, astral body, ether body and physical body act together in the human being. We gained a general idea of the way soul and body interact, even at the level of glandular function, and of muscle function being made to serve the will, and found that account had to be taken of the way the soul principle comes to expression in the living body.

To study the life of mind and spirit, we have to consider the alternation between waking and sleeping. As you know, this consists in the first place in life swinging to and fro between day-time waking state and night-time sleep within the 24-hour day. We also know that human beings are awake and asleep in another way, for we are really only fully awake when we form ideas and perceive with the senses. The life of the will and of physical actions is really a life of sleep even when we are awake.

The life of feelings, we know, is a dream life even when we are awake. This, then, is another way in which human beings let life swing to and fro between waking and sleeping. Waking sleep, as we may call it, influences the life of ideas when we bring an act of will to expression and are awake in our doing by being able to form an idea of the action. We do, however remain unconscious of what actually happens when we perform the action, as unconscious as when we are asleep.

The fact that we feel ourselves to be individual beings we really owe to sleep. If we were always awake and given up to the life of ideas, our experience of the world would be limited to a sequence of images. We would have the feeling that we are at rest, as it were, in a fixed location in the universe, and the universe itself would be present in form of images. The I, too, would be no more than a kind of mirrored reflection. We are brought back to ourselves in our wide-awake life of ideas in two ways. Firstly, we pour into this life the continual memory of being in a condition of sleep between going to sleep and waking, a condition in which we do not experience anything. Secondly, we have indefinite recollections of our will intent, that is, of something that is sleep-like by nature, playing into conscious life. This gives us a feeling for the I and the I impulse. In ordinary life we do not have conscious awareness of the I impulse but experience it as a nudge coming from our organization. On the other hand we are aware of it because between going to sleep and waking up we go out into the cosmos with the I, which otherwise does not enter into ordinary consciousness, and astral body, which equally does not come to awareness. It is the dimming-down of consciousness between going to sleep and waking up that comes to conscious awareness.

What is it that puts us to sleep over and over again, pushing our will intent and much of our feeling life into the night-time darkness of the conscious mind? It is the need to develop organic activity in the exercise of the will. In the last lecture we noted that when human beings exercise the will they let their soul principle influence even the life of the muscles. The soul immerses itself in the life of the muscles, as it were, and we become unconscious of it, just as we become unconscious of the soul when it leaves the body and enters into a different state during going to sleep and waking up. We are therefore able to say that it is due to the needs and conditions of the living body that we are consciously aware of our I in ordinary life. It is due to the fact that we have a body which lays claim to the soul when will is to be exercised, and chases the soul down into the unconsciousness of sleep because it wants to balance the energies it develops in will activity. This enables it to mediate full awareness of the I at all times, even though the I exists at an unconscious level.

We are thus able to say that we enter into the living physical body by pouring our spirit, and that means in the first place the soul principle, into it. We shall see in a minute that with the soul principle we actually pour the spirit into the physical body. We feel physically strong when the soul has been poured into the body. We do not feel physically strong, but wide awake, when we have ideas and sensory perceptions.

To have ideas and sensory perceptions means not to live in the body. It is quite wrong to think that we must have imaginative, inspired and intuitive perception to enter into the world of the spirit. People are actually in the world of the spirit when they make sensory perceptions and have ideas. We have seen in these lectures that sensory perceptions depend on dead matter, purely physical apparatus, being embedded in the organism, with only the ether body present in them. In sensory perception we have experiences in the physical apparatus, which does not in itself come to experience . It is the spiritual process in the apparatus that we experience. The content of sensory perception is definitely spiritual by nature. It is merely that when we form ideas we extend the sensory activity to the nerve organization. Nerve activity actually is a process of dying. Organic activity has to be excluded when we want to form ideas. This is why we are definitely in the sphere of the spirit when we have sensory perceptions and ideas.

As we are human, and live between birth and death, our life in this sphere of the spirit is such, however, that we have only images of it. Characteristically, therefore, the things of the spirit first come to conscious awareness in sensory perceptions and ideas, but only in images. We are thus able to say: Sensory perceptions and ideas are experiences of life in the spirit, but only in images (written on the board, see table). When it comes to ideas we are in fact aware that they are abstract by nature and that the images they give are not rich and full. Things turn grey, we might say, when we move back from sensory perception to the life of ideas. That greyness exists only for our conscious life, however, for in reality all ideas developed by human beings contain Imaginations.

I am therefore able to say that ideas contain Imaginations, but these do not come to conscious awareness. The ideas we have in everyday life are a kind of extract of those Imaginations. The imaging process extends back into the body, and a pale reflection of our ideas comes to conscious awareness. Every single time you have an idea you also have an Imagination, but whilst the idea remains in the conscious mind, the Imagination slips down and lives in the general vitality, or vital activity, of your organism.

imaginations
Fig. 21

To draw it (Fig. 21), I would have to put the head here, with the process of sensory perception (red), then comes the activity of forming an idea (blue, green) based on sensory perceptions, and this really shows a Janus24Janus was an ancient Italian deity said to be the protector of doors and gates. He was shown with a face on the front and another on the back of his head. The month January is named after him. face. In front it is the pale idea which comes to conscious awareness; at the back it is the Imagination which does not become conscious. The Imagination goes down into the organism, where it becomes part of general vital activity. It enters into every organ—it lives in the brain, in the heart, in the lungs, in the kidneys, everywhere. It unites with our general vitality.

Remarkably, the result is this: here, where I have drawn in red and blue, we have the spirit in our picture. None of that which extends down into the physical body comes to conscious awareness, but we experience it as our inner life. The spirit, then, is spirit in the forward direction; it is soul at the back, where it faces the organism (green). In the sphere of the soul, however, it immediately begins to go down into half conscious and unconscious spheres, uniting with the living body.

Below this here (pointing to the drawing) lies unconscious soul activity, and the Imagination vanishes into it. Coming from the other side we have the living physical body, but this is immersed in the night of our consciousness, in sleep, and only comes to expression when it sends the will upwards into conscious awareness. The will is the counter thrust; it makes us physically strong and gives us experience of reality. That experience, however, will at most come up as a feeling. We dream of this reality but essentially do not have it in waking consciousness.

As human beings between birth and death the price we pay for existing in the sphere of the spirit is to experience the spirit in the images of our sensory perceptions and of our ideas. We have living experience of reality, but it enters our conscious mind unconsciously, just as the reality of the outside world comes in unconsciously.

We enter into outside reality, but essentially it enters into us at an unconscious level because we know nothing of the states of sleep when we are out there in the outside reality, which spins a web around us, as it were and enters into us all unconscious. There (pointing to the drawing) we live in the reality, but we live in a physical body, or in an outer, physical element. In so far as we live in the element of the spirit we know it only as image. The physical body is however created out of the spirit, and if we develop our faculty of Imagination, we can gain living insight into the imaginative life that lies at the back of it.

Going further back in the sphere of the soul, we can also gain experience of what in ordinary consciousness are our feelings. First of all, conscious experience of feeling is gained. But behind our feeling lies Inspiration. Every single time you have a feeling you also have an Inspiration. But just as your Imaginations slide down into general vitality when you have ideas, so the Inspiration slides down into the physical body when you feel. You need it down there for your breathing activity and rhythmical function. The Inspiration unites with general rhythmical activity.

I can now put it like this: Further back in us we experience our feelings, and by entering more deeply into these we have inner experience, which is at a dream level. In this, however, Inspiration lies hidden (see Fig. 21).

A hidden Inspiration slips into rhythmical movement and activity, into our breathing and the circulation of the blood. If we were to have a look at someone who was thinking and feeling we might say: You have ideas and you think; this is something you know. But from this activity Imaginations are continuously instilled into every part of your body to maintain your vitality. You feel—and Inspirations are continually going down into your breathing and circulation.

Below this lies will activity. Among the activities of life between birth and death, will activity in the first place belongs purely to the living physical body, and it is experienced as such, for muscle activity lays claim to the spirit. So we have experience of it in the body, but at the sleep level, for only the spirit can be experienced in full consciousness. Here, it sleeps. But there is Intuition in there. It is genuine Intuition when human beings do what I spoke of the last time and send their inner activity and therefore also the spiritual experience they have into their muscle activity in form of images and thus become doers, people with will intent. They are then truly intuiting. They go outside their I life, letting the I enter into something entirely different, which is the movement of muscles and bones. Thus we can say: Intuition slips into metabolic and movement activity. The spirit therefore has its life in Imagination, Inspiration and Intuition.

Sensory perceptions,
ideas
Living experience in the spirit, but in images;
Imaginations slip into vitality.
Feelings Inner experience, but dreaming;
Inspiration slips into rhythmical activity.
Will activity Living experience in the physical body,
but sleeping; Intuition slips into metabolic
and movement activity.

You see, we now have the spirit wholly inside the body. We have Intuition in metabolism and in the movement of the limbs, Inspiration in rhythmical activity, and Imagination in general vitality. Only the perception of objects exists at the level of images, activity of the spirit in images. Being mere images they are also able to combine with the images of the outside world.

The last time we tried to see soul and body together in our thoughts. We have seen that the soul principle is active in the head and in the nerves and senses, where a continual dying process occurs, which allows the soul principle to come into its own as the organic principle is destroyed.

We have seen that in glandular activity the soul principle lays claim to the physical, but only to a limited extent, so that the gland then secretes matter. When muscles and bones are actively used, the soul principle is completely laid hold of by the physical. I made it very clear that we do not waffle on about an abstract interrelationship between the living physical body, the soul and the spirit, nor of the physical relating in some way to a “psychoid” element. No, we consider the soul in real terms and perceive the way the physical body takes the soul principle into itself and everywhere makes it part of itself. Now we have also seen that the spiritual principle, which initially exists only in images in us, nevertheless also lives in the living physical body.

Imagination, Inspiration and Intuition are not something we grasp the way we do the wind and the clouds. They are something that is very much present in the activity of the living body, slipping across into it, whilst we are only able to hold on to images of the things of the spirit. We are thus also able to penetrate to the spiritual principle in the human being. We can consider the human being in terms of form, of levels of life, of soul content, and of the spirit coming to revelation.

The human form is of course dependent on the fixed stars, but it presents itself to us in visible form. The levels of life are dependent on the planetary sphere. In our ordinary consciousness we cannot see them in physical form. We perceive them in so far as they come to expression in aspects of form. Deep down in us rests the soul principle. We gain access to it by considering the mysterious relationships between the activity of nerves and senses and the soul principle, turning our attention to glandular activity in relation to the life of feeling and everything connected with rhythmical activity. We also saw how the soul principle is connected with the metabolism and limbs. At one extreme of life, however, the spiritual enters into the soul principle; it is only able to take hold of images and pushes Imagination, Inspiration and Intuition down into the physical body. And when the spirit thus pours into the soul, it lives in the soul as the most inward element that human beings possess.

The other extreme does not draw human beings into the particular way in which they have sensory activity from within, ideas and feelings, where human beings go down into the physical, into reality, with their spirit, and where the physical, with the spirit, is tinged with the Inspirations which in turn take in Imaginations that come down. This is something that comes to expression when we contemplate in an inward way a human being who is before us and who is fully at rest. When we study the physiognomy, which shines out when the spirit enters into the living body, sending Inspiration into it, the spirit comes to the surface again, coming out through the impulses given by life and giving the human being first of all the flesh colour of the skin, and whatever else there is by way of physiognomy, showing itself in the noble brow, in the shape of the mouth and chin, the form of the nose, and so on. This spirit, entering into the body as Inspiration, becomes active through the levels of life and thus shows itself in the human being who is at rest.

As soon as people start to walk, to be active, and even if they just blink an eye, we see the Intuition aspect of the spirit which is sent down into the living body. When we look at the way someone walks, and at their gestures, we see the working of that person’s spirit, which, however, enters into the body as Intuition, being present not as spirit but as processes that generate heat, processes of chemical decomposition that occur in the body when a person is active in the world.

When we looked at the form, we had something which the world gives to the human being. Now that we have seen the spirit enter completely into the living body, we find that in activity the human being is in turn giving things to the world. But the price we have to pay for having part in the spirit between birth and death is that we have the spirit not in its reality but in the form of images. We do have the spirit in us as something real when we are between birth and death, but the price we have to pay is that we know this reality only when asleep, albeit in waking sleep. We really should say that life between birth and death means that human beings experience the spirit in the reflected glory of images but have no conscious experience of its reality, which only presents itself through the medium of the living body.

Between birth and death we see the spirit in the living body it has created. It is not really matter which we see, for matter is the outer reflection and not the inner reality of the spirit. We may therefore say that when we see any kind of matter in the world around us or in human beings it always means the the reality is hidden from us and only the surface present itself. There the spirit reveals itself out of the reality of the body and of matter. Fig. 22.

It is different when human beings partake of the spirit. Then the physical aspects, for instance the inner parts of the head—and the outer part, too, if they are not just looking in a mirror, though even then all they have is an image—remain in the background, whilst the spirit is really experienced, though only in its image. In the conscious mind we inwardly see the spirit, but as an image. Sleeping, and also in waking sleep, we perceive the spirit in its activity, but the essential reality of the perception does not come to conscious awareness; it remains outside.

image versus reality
Fig. 22
So if we see a physical surface somewhere we have to say: the spirit is behind it. We cannot enter into the spirit with the conscious mind. In ordinary consciousness we must look for the spirit inwardly, and we experience it only as image. The great change that happens to human beings is this: At death this reality (left) becomes image, and the images we experience (blue, on the right) become reality. Going through the gate of death, human beings begin to experience as their reality the things they only perceived as images before, and the reality which they slept through until then becomes image—an image, however, in which the next life on earth is in preparation, when everything will be the other way round again.

Everything is always completely the other way round.

You see, to consider the human form we have to go a long way, to the great world of the fixed stars. Out in that world lie the impulses responsible for giving the human head, chest and limbs their specific form. Coming closer to the human being we encounter the planetary system, the sphere of the planets, and we find that this creates the levels of life in human beings. Then we have to go right inside the human being to find the soul principle. And when we actually enter into this we find the alternation between waking and sleeping, image and reality. Coming to the human being of mind and spirit we discover the spiritual principle in man.

I am now going to present something to you that many of you may well find to be extraordinarily abstract and indeed most strange. Please take it and think of it as some nuts that you have to crack, for what I intend to develop during these last fifteen minutes may prove important for you when you come to consider the nature of the world one day.

If we really visualize the road we have to travel from the whole universe, the fixed stars, through the planetary system and all the way to inside the human being, something quite specific comes to mind for those who are in a position to have this happen. You see, mathematicians establish the location of a body, or of a point—this is very important for those who work with the theory of relativity today—by thinking of three lines at right angles to one another that intersect in one point.

location of a point
Fig. 23

If they then want to give the location of point A, let us say (Fig. 23), they measure the distance from the three planes defined by the three lines. So if you have those three lines, you can give the location of any point. All it needs is to assume these three axes at right angles to one another, which are called “co-ordinates”. They enable us to define the location of any other point, or line, which after all can only be defined by the points it contains, and so on. (Fig. 23)

Mathematicians are inordinately proud of being able to define any location in this way. They speak of the three coordinates as the x, y and z co-ordinates. Yet for someone who is not just a mathematician but is someone connected with reality, as well as having studied mathematics, a question arises at this point.

Such a person would say: During life between birth and death—our mathematicians today do not work with life between death and rebirth, and everything they work with lies between birth and death—we, as human beings, are really always also in the outer reality, and as human beings we see, or perceive with some other sense, what is in the world outside us. I think you’ll agree that the world looks quite different if I stand in one place or another. When I stand over there—well, there would be a considerable difference due to the fact that when I stand here I look you straight in the eye, and if I were over there I would see you all from the other side. Speaking in terms of reality, then, we can always assess reality only from one particular point of view, for human beings can never completely remove themselves from reality.

In a way modern thinkers are always longing, however, to remove themselves from reality. Physicists want to exclude anything that is subjective. A modern physicist recently asked the question: What exists, really? What has being?—Even in our (German) language, the verb for “to be” (sein) derives from the verb “to see” (sehen), so that if we do not exclude the human being we would have to say, in popular terms: Anything you see, exists.—However, physicists are unable to accept this, and a modern physicist therefore gave the following definition: “Anything that can be measured, exists”. This means the object is not seen in relation to the human being but to an objective measuring rod; the human being is excluded.

Another example of excluding the human being is one I have mentioned on a number of occasions. It is the explanation given for the nebular hypothesis of Laplace. You take a droplet of oil, a playing card on a pin—a sewing pin will also serve—and rotate it, and droplets separate out. But nothing would separate out, and the whole small planetary system would not arise if it were not for the schoolmaster who turned the pin! Yet when people want to explain the universe they leave out the schoolmaster. Otherwise the teacher would have to say: Look, children, there a planetary system is evolving, but I am the one who turns the pin; and out there the great planetary system is evolving, and there is the great God who turns the great pin. The world could not evolve if there were not a god out there, who relatively speaking would be much bigger, as I am the little god to you here.—You see, that is what the teacher should really be saying.

He does not, of course. In modern thinking we have got into the habit of declaring that the point of view does not exist, as it were. It is declared non-existent even in analytical geometry, as I have shown. But then it is difficult to answer the question: Who is it who is looking? Who is really seeing this object here without seeing the x, y and z co-ordinates in perspective? Where is the individual who sees it like this? (Fig. 23) Well, you know, he can’t be in that place, nor in that place, he can’t be in any of those place, for if he were, he’d always see in perspective. But if he were far enough away, over yonder in infinity, he would see the vertical z line in the right way. He’d have to be a devil of a fellow to see this axis of co-ordinates, as it is called, which is shown meeting in a point in Figure 23; for he’d have to be out there in infinity—in that place, that place, and that one, everywhere within infinity. That is the point of view, which has to be everywhere at once, from which to consider all three dimensions as they are at right angles to each other. When we speak of space, and indeed of analytical geometry, the point of view has to be from all points in infinity.

And now let us take the opposite. Let us consider how human beings truly experience themselves inwardly. They feel themselves to be a point at the centre of the universe, and they are really always taking sights. Before them, or rather around them, they have their horizon. Anything at, above or below the horizon is experienced in a way I might describe as follows: They experience along their line of vision—it could also be the line of touch—or somewhere above or below, it might also be over here; in short they increase or decrease the angle, or open it in an upward or downward direction.

line of sight
Fig. 24

Mathematicians do the same thing, but they do so from a specific point of view. In this case they are actually taking the human being into account, though they won’t admit it since it would be disgraceful for a modern thinker to include the human being in one’s approach. So they speak of a point and define a second point somewhere else by determining the deviation from the line of vision. Thus they say: this point here is so far away that there is a possibility—well, I won’t go as far as to introduce you to the cosine, as it is called—of defining it. The point will always be different, however, and so will be its cosine, if the sight is taken from higher up or lower down. And if you really think about it, this is where we find ourselves entirely in the real world. The mathematicians have it; they call it a polar co-ordinate system.

We now arrive at a rather peculiar statement. We are able to say: That’s not a devil of a fellow, for it is always I myself. Wherever I may be, the point at the centre of the co-ordinate system is my point of view. If we are looking at space, which is what we are in fact doing, we are everywhere out there in infinity. We ourselves are that devil of a fellow. But if you consider the centre we have here from everywhere out there in infinity, what lies in between? Between point and infinity lies the circle.

lcircle with a central point
Fig. 25

If you go out to infinity, passing through space, you will find something in there. But if you visualize the point of view that is everywhere in infinity, you are in the region where things are seen from the point of view of the fixed stars. If you move inwards to the centre, you are in the region of the human point of view. Between the two lies the circle, or at least an approximate circle: the movements of the planets. It cannot be any other way. When the human being is mediated to the world through the soul, this has to happen through a circular movement, through spheres. This is simply due to the inner constitution of the universe. We therefore have to find the stars that move in orbits between ourselves and infinity.

You see, in very early times, instinctive clairvoyance established mathematics on the basis of this very real situation: cosmic space with its three dimensions and a point of view everywhere at infinity; the sphere and the centre which is oneself. This was the starting point for the mathematics of old. Today the science has become abstract and deals only in formulae, not reality. But if we consider it in an inner way, as we have been doing, we can still get a feeling for the way in which the science which modern mathematicians are forced to put before their mind’s eye as a system of co-ordinates, or polar co-ordinates, originates in the inner structure of the universe.

You see, if Einstein, or one of his followers, began to talk today, you would almost always find that they base themselves on some form of co-ordinate system and then move on to the theory of relativity. It is not surprising that all things become relative in this case. For as soon as you start to consider reality you have to change, or ought to change, into the devil of a fellow who is everywhere at infinity. And it makes no difference if the distance is a mile, or more, or less, or the diameter of the earth or even the sun—for all things become relative. We have the theory of relativity because the point of view is at infinity and it makes no difference how far things are apart. If you consider all the arbitrary reasons that are given, you find everything becomes relative. That is the true, psychological reason. All you have to do is look into these things.

Tomorrow we shall build on the basis we have gained today.

Achtzehnter Vortrag

[ 1 ] Wir haben den Menschen betrachtet in seinem Verhältnisse zum Kosmos in bezug auf die Form der menschlichen Organisation, in bezug auf die Lebensstufen, in bezug auf die Seeleninhalte, und wir wollen heute noch, um gewissermaßen ein anderes Kapitel für die beiden nächsten Tage vorzubereiten, auch die Geisteserlebnisse des Menschen ins Auge fassen.

[ 2 ] Erinnern wir uns, wie wir darangegangen sind, den Menschen in bezug auf die Formung seines Organismus zu betrachten. Wir mußten ja die menschliche Organisation in ein Verhältnis bringen zum Kosmos bis an den Fixsternhimmel. Wir mußten dann, um die menschlichen Lebensstufen ins Auge zu fassen, das planetarische System, in dem der Mensch lebt, vor unsere Seele hinstellen. Und indem wir dann übergingen zu den Seelenerscheinungen, mußten wir gewissermaßen eine Schwenkung machen und den Menschen als seelisches Wesen in ein Verhältnis bringen zu seiner leiblichen Organisation, das heißt zu demjenigen, was er eben durch den Fixsternhimmel und durch das Planetensystem hat. Und wir haben ja durch die Formbetrachtung, durch die Lebensbetrachtung auch jene Gegensätzlichkeit vor unsere Seele hingestellt, welche in der Kopfesorganisation, in der Brustorganisation, in der Stoffwechsel-Gliedmaßenorganisation im Menschen vorhanden ist. Wir haben gesehen, wie das Seelische als Sinneswahrnehmung und Vorstellung gerade durch die Hauptesorganisation sich auslebt, durch die Sinnes-Nervenorganisation, und wir haben dann gesehen, wie das Gefühlsleben durch die Atmungs- und Zirkulationsorganisation zum Ausdrucke kommt, das Willensleben durch das Stoff‚ wechsel-Gliedmaßensystem. Wir mußten aber, um das Seelische zu betrachten, darauf Rücksicht nehmen, wie im Menschen das Ich, der astralische Leib, der Ätherleib und der physische Leib zusammenwirken.

[ 3 ] So daß wir wirklich das letzte Mal einen Überblick bekommen haben von dem Ineinanderweben des Seelischen und des Leiblichen bis in die Drüsentätigkeit, bis in die Inanspruchnahme der Muskeltätigkeit durch den Willen.

[ 4 ] Wenn man nun zum Geistigen im Menschen kommen will, so kann man nicht bloß den Menschen so betrachten, wie das letzte Mal für das Seelische, wo wir Rücksicht zu nehmen hatten auf das Ausleben, auf die Offenbarung dieses Seelischen im Leiblichen, sondern man muß, wenn man das Geistige ins Auge fassen will, auf die Wechselzustände des Menschen sehen, auf das Wachen und Schlafen.

[ 5 ] Wachen und Schlafen, wir wissen es ja, sind uns zunächst als Menschen gegeben in dem Hinundherschwingen des menschlichen Lebens innerhalb von vierundzwanzig Stunden im Tageswachen und eben im Nachtschlafe. Das ist die eine Art, wie der Mensch lebt im Wachen und Schlafen. Wir wissen aber auch, daß der Mensch noch auf andere Art im Wachen und Schlafen vorhanden ist. Wenn der Mensch nämlich vorstellt und sich den Sinneswahrnehmungen hingibt, dann nur ist er ja eigentlich voll wach. Nur das Vorstellungs- und Sinneswahrnehmungsleben ist eigentlich das Wachsein. Dagegen ist das Willensleben und das Tatleben eigentlich ein Schlafensleben auch während des Wachens.

[ 6 ] Das Gefühlsleben ist, wie wir wissen, ein Traumesleben auch während des Wachens. So daß also der Mensch auch in dieser Beziehung sein Leben gewissermaßen hin- und herschwingen läßt zwischen Wachen und Schlafen. Das Schlafen, ich möchte sagen, das wachende Schlafen spielt gewissermaßen in unser wirkliches Wachen, das heißt in das Vorstellungsleben herein, wenn wir einen Willensakt ausdrücken, wenn wir tätig sind, wach sind im Tätigsein dadurch, daß wir unsere eigene Tätigkeit vorstellen können. Was aber in dieser Tätigkeit vor sich geht, das bleibt so unbewußt wie die Zustände während des Schlafes.

[ 7 ] Aber daß der Mensch sich als ein individuelles Wesen fühlt, das verdankt er doch eigentlich dem Schlafe. Wenn der Mensch nur wachend dem Vorstellungsleben hingegeben wäre, so würde er die Welt gewissermaßen nur wie einen Ablauf von Bildern erleben. Er würde sich gewissermaßen ruhend fühlen, wie in einem Punkte des Weltenalls verharrend, und in Bildern würde das Weltenall vorhanden sein. Im Bildweben würde auch das Ich wie eine Art von Spiegelbild von etwas, aber doch eben nur wie ein Bild vorhanden sein. Nur dadurch, daß wir in dieses wache Vorstellungsleben gewissermaßen hineingießen erstens das fortwährende Erinnern daran, daß wir eigentlich Zustände haben, in denen wir nichts erleben, Schlafzustände, die Zeit vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen, das führt uns auf uns selbst zurück. Und auch die unbestimmte Besinnung darauf, was wir wollen, also daß etwas Schlafartiges in unser bewußtes Dasein hineinspielt, das gibt uns unser Ich-Gefühl, unseren Ich-Impuls. Wir erleben ihn im gewöhnlichen Leben nicht vollbewußt, wir erleben ihn gewissermaßen als den aus unserer Organisation kommenden Stoß in das Bewußtsein hinein, diesen Ich-Impuls. Und wir erleben ihn auf der anderen Seite dadurch, daß wir vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen eben mit unserem Ich, das aber sonst ja nicht in das gewöhnliche Bewußtsein hereintritt und mit unserem astralischen Leibe, der ebensowenig in das gewöhnliche Bewußtsein hereintritt, daß wir mit diesen uns in den Kosmos hinausbegeben und daß das gewissermaßen in unser Bewußtsein hereinschlägt, was wir als Verdunkelung dieses Bewußtseins erleben vom Einschlafen bis zum Aufwachen.

[ 8 ] Was ist es denn, was uns immer wiederum in den Schlaf versetzt, was unser Wollen und einen großen Teil unseres Fühlens in Unbewußtheit, gewissermaßen in die Nacht des Bewußtseins hinunterdrückt? Das ist es, daß wir im Wollen organische Tätigkeit entwickeln müssen. Wir haben ja das letzte Mal gesehen, wie der Mensch im Wollen sein Seelisches hineinwirken läßt bis in das Muskelleben. Es taucht gewissermaßen die Seele in das Muskelleben unter. Da wird sie unbewußt, geradeso wie sie unbewußt wird, wenn sie aus dem Leibe herausgeht und in dem Zustand zwischen dem Einschlafen und dem Aufwachen verharrt. Wir können also sagen: Es kommt von den Bedürfnissen, von den Bedingungen des Leiblichen, daß wir uns zunächst im gewöhnlichen Leben unseres Ich bewußt sind, es kommt davon, daß wir einen Leib an uns tragen, der, wenn Wollen ausgeführt werden soll, die Seele für sich in Anspruch nimmt, der, wenn er die Kräfte, die er im Wollen entwickelt, ausgleichen will, die Seele in die Unbewußtheit des Schlafes hinunterjagt, um eben immer voll das Bewußtsein des eigentlich unbewußt vorhandenen Ich vermitteln zu können. So also können wir sagen: Wir tauchen in das Leiblich-Physische unter, indem wir in dieses Leiblich-Physische hineingießen unseren Geist beziehungsweise zunächst unser Seelisches. Aber wir werden gleich sehen, daß wir mit diesem Seelischen eben unseren Geist in das Physisch-Leibliche hineinergießen. Da fühlen wir uns, möchte ich sagen, robust, wenn die Seele in den Leib hinuntergegossen ist. Wir fühlen uns nicht robust, aber wach, wenn wir Vorstellungen und Sinneswahrnehmungen haben.

[ 9 ] Vorstellungen haben und Sinneswahrnehmungen haben, heißt nun aber, nicht im Leibe leben. Es ist durchaus ein Verkennen, wenn man glaubt, erst das imaginative, das inspirierte und das intuitive Erkennen führen den Menschen in die geistige Welt hinein. Nein, der Mensch lebt schon in der geistigen Welt, wenn er Sinneswahrnehmungen hat und wenn er Vorstellungen bildet. Denn wir haben ja gesehen, daß die Sinneswahrnehmungen daran geknüpft sind, daß überhaupt schon tote Materie, rein physische Apparate in unseren Organismus eingelagert sind, die nur vom Ätherleib durchzogen werden; aber sie sind eingelagert. Und indem wir in diesem physischen Apparat erleben, erleben wir die Sinneswahrnehmung. Der physische Apparat wird nicht erlebt; das Geistige, das darinnen vorgeht, wird erlebt. Seinem Wesen nach ist der Inhalt der Sinneswahrnehmung durchaus geistig. Nur, wie wir das letzte Mal gesehen haben, breiten wir im Vorstellen gewissermaßen die Sinnestätigkeit über die Nervenorganisation aus. Die Nerventätigkeit besteht eigentlich in einem Absterben. Es muß die organische Tätigkeit gerade ausgeschaltet werden, wenn wir vorstellen wollen. Daher leben wir, indem wir Sinneswahrnehmungen haben und Vorstellungen haben, durchaus im Geistigen. Aber wir leben als Menschen, die da leben zwischen Geburt und Tod, dieses Leben im Geistigen dadurch, daß wir von ihm, von diesem Leben, nur Bilder haben. Das ist das Eigentümliche, daß uns das Geistige zunächst in den Sinneswahrnehmungen und in den Vorstellungen bewußt wird, aber nur in Bildern. So daß wir sagen können (siehe Darstellung Seite 127): Sinneswahrnehmungen, Vorstellungen sind geistiges Erleben, aber in Bildern. Bei den Vorstellungen sind wir uns ja bewußt, sie tragen als solche einen abstrakten Charakter, sie sind nicht intensiv gesättigte Bilder. Es wird grau, möchte man sagen, wenn man von den Sinneswahrnehmungen zum Vorstellungsleben zurückgeht. Aber nur für unser Bewußtsein wird es grau. In Wirklichkeit enthalten alle Vorstellungen, die der Mensch entwickelt, Imaginationen.

[ 10 ] So daß ich sagen kann: Die Vorstellungen, sie enthalten durchaus Imaginationen, nur kommen diese Imaginationen nicht zum Bewußtsein. Es ist gewissermaßen eine Art von Auszug aus diesen Imaginationen, die man im gewöhnlichen Leben als Vorstellungen hat. Das Imaginieren geht nach rückwärts in das Leibliche hinein, und das, was uns zum Bewußtsein kommt, ist das zurückgeworfene blasse Bild der Vorstellungen. Jedesmal, wenn Sie eine Vorstellung haben, und immerwährend, wenn Sie Vorstellungen haben, so haben Sie auch Imaginationen. Nur daß die Vorstellungen im Bewußtsein bleiben; die Imaginationen schlüpfen Ihnen hinunter und leben in der allgemeinen Vitalität Ihres Organismus, in der allgemeinen Lebenstätigkeit. Also die Imaginationen schlüpfen in die Vitalität, in die allgemeine Lebenstätigkeit hinein. Wenn ich das schematisch zeichnen sollte (siehe Zeichnung), so müßte ich so zeichnen (Kopf): Wir haben die Sinneswahrnehmung (rot), haben dann die Vorstellungstätigkeit, die wir uns bilden (blau, grün) aus der Sinneswahrnehmung und die eigentlich ein Janusgesicht hat. Nach vorn ist sie eben die blasse Vorstellung, die kommt in unser Bewußtsein; nach rückwärts ist sie Imagination, aber die Imagination kommt nicht ins Bewußtsein. Die Imagination geht in dem Organismus unter und bildet da die allgemeine Lebenstätigkeit. Sie geht in alle Organe hinein, diese Imagination, sie lebt im Gehirn, sie lebt im Herzen, sie lebt in der Lunge, sie lebt in den Nieren, sie lebt überall, sie geht in alle Organe hinein, diese Imagination. Sie vereinigt sich mit der allgemeinen Lebenskraft.

[ 11 ] Dadurch tritt dieses Eigentümliche ein: Wir haben hier, soweit ich rot, blau gezeichnet habe, den Geist im Bild. Wir haben nichts im Bewußtsein von dem, was da hinunterragt in die Leiblichkeit, aber wir erleben es als seelisch. Der Geist ist also gewissermaßen nach vorn Geist; nach rückwärts, nach dem Organismus hinein (grün) ist er Seele. Aber im Seelischen beginnt er gleich unterzutauchen in das Halbbewußte und Unbewußte und vereinigt sich mit dem Leiblichen.

[ 12 ] Unterhalb dessen, was wir hier (siehe Zeichnung) haben, haben wir die unbewußte seelische Tätigkeit. Dahinein verschwindet also die Imagination. Und dann haben wir von der anderen Seite die Leiblichkeit. Aber diese Leiblichkeit ist in die Nacht des Bewußtseins, in den Schlaf hineingetaucht und äußert sich nur, indem sie den Willen heraufschickt bis in das Bewußtsein. Dieser Wille ist eben der Gegenstoß; der macht uns robust, der gibt uns Erleben der Wirklichkeit. Aber dieses Erleben der Wirklichkeit stößt höchstens noch als Gefühl herauf. Da träumen wir von dieser Wirklichkeit; aber im wesentlichen haben wir diese Wirklichkeit nicht im wachen Bewußtsein. So daß wir als Menschen zwischen Geburt und Tod unser Sein im Geistigen dadurch erkaufen, daß wir den Geist im Bilde erleben, im Bilde der Sinneswahrnehmungen, im Bilde der Vorstellungen; daß wir die Wirklichkeit zwar erleben, daß sie aber unbewußt hereinspielt in unser Bewußtsein, wie auch die äußere Wirklichkeit unbewußt hereinspielt.

[ 13 ] Wir tauchen unter in diese äußere Wirklichkeit, aber sie spielt im Grunde genommen - weil wir von den Schlafzuständen, wo wir draußen sind in der äußeren Wirklichkeit, nichts wissen -, sie spielt auch unbewußt herein. Wir werden gewissermaßen von dem Unbewußten umsponnen, von dem Unbewußten durchdrungen. Da leben wir in der Wirklichkeit. Aber wir leben im Leiblichen oder im Äußerlich-Physischen. Indem wir im Geistigen leben, erleben wir den Geist nur als Bild.

[ 14 ] Aber alles Leibliche ist vom Geistigen aufgebaut. Und wenn der Mensch nun seine Imagination ausbildet, so erlebt er schon das imaginative Leben, das da zurückliegt. Er erlebt auch weiter im Seelischen zurückliegend das, was im gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein als Gefühl vorhanden ist. Er erlebt das Gefühl zunächst bewußt. Aber hinter dem Gefühl, da ist die Inspiration.

[ 15 ] Jedesmal, wenn Sie ein Gefühl haben, haben Sie auch eine Inspiration. Aber geradeso wie beim Vorstellen einem die Imaginationen hinunterrutschen in die allgemeine Vitalität, so rutscht einem beim Fühlen die Inspiration hinunter in die Leiblichkeit, denn Sie brauchen sie dort unten. Sie brauchen sie zu der Atmungstätigkeit, zu der rhythmischen Tätigkeit. Da, mit der allgemeinen rhythmischen Tätigkeit verbindet sie sich. Also es rutscht in Ihre Atmungsvorgänge die Inspiration von Ihrem Gefühl ebenso hinein, wie von den Vorstellungen die Imagination in die allgemeine Vitalität hineinrutscht.

[ 16 ] So daß ich sagen darf: Wir erleben weiter nach rückwärts in uns die Gefühle, und dadurch, daß wir in die Gefühle weiter eintauchen, haben wir das seelische Erleben, seelisches Erleben, aber träumend - aber wir haben darinnen eine verborgene Inspiration (siehe Zeichnung Seite 125). Eine verborgene Inspiration schlüpft in die Rhythmusbewegung, Rhythmustätigkeit. In Atmen und Blutzirkulation schlüpft das hinunter. Wenn man nachschauen würde, wenn man einen Menschen vor sich hätte, der denkt und fühlt, so könnte man so sagen: Du hast jetzt Vorstellungen, du denkst ja, das weißt du; aber aus deinem Vorstellen tropfen fortwährend durch deinen ganzen Leib die Imaginationen hinunter und erhalten deine Vitalität. Du fühlst; da tropfen fortwährend die Inspirationen in die Atmung und in die Blutzirkulation hinein.

[ 17 ] Und darunter liegt dann das Wollen. Das Wollen ist zunächst innerhalb der Lebensbetätigung des Menschen zwischen Geburt und Tod rein leiblich-physische Betätigung, ist leiblich-physisch zu erleben, denn der Geist wird in Anspruch genommen von der Muskeltätigkeit leiblich-physisches Erleben, aber schlafend, denn bewußt kann man nur den Geist erleben. Hier schläft er. Da drinnen ist aber Intuition. Es ist wirkliche Intuition, was ich das letzte Mal geschildert habe, wo der Mensch seine Seelentätigkeit und damit auch das Geistige, das er erlebt, in Bildern hinübersendet in seine Muskeltätigkeit, so daß er regsam wird, so daß er ein Handelnder, ein Wollender wird. Da intuitiert er wirklich. Da geht er aus seinem Ich-Leben heraus, läßt dieses Ich also in etwas ganz anderes, nämlich in die eigene Muskel-Knochenbewegung hinein. So daß wir sagen können: Die Intuition schlüpft in die Stoffwechsel- und Bewegungstätigkeit. Der Geist aber lebt eben in Imagination, Inspiration, Intuition.

Sinneswahrnehmungen,
Vorstellungen: Geistiges Erleben, aber in Bildern,
Imaginationen schlüpfen in die Vitalität

Gefühle: Seelisches Erleben, aber träumend,
Inspiration schlüpft in die Rhythmustätigkeit

Wollen: Leiblich-physisches Erleben, aber schlafend,
Intuition schlüpft in die Stoffwechsel- und Bewegungstätigkeit

[ 18 ] Sie sehen, jetzt haben wir den Geist ganz im Leibe drinnen. Die Intuition haben wir im Stoffwechsel und in der Bewegung der Gliedmaßen. Die Inspiration haben wir in der rhythmischen Tätigkeit. Die Imagination haben wir in der allgemeinen Vitalität. Und nur das gegenständliche Erkennen, das haben wir als Bildhaftigkeit, als geistige Wirksamkeit in Bildern. Weil es bloße Bilder sind, können sie sich auch vereinigen mit den Bildern der Außenwelt.

[ 19 ] Wir haben das letzte Mal versucht, das Seelische mit dem Leiblichen zusammenzudenken. Wir haben gesehen, wie dieses Seelische im Kopfe, in der Nerven-Sinnesorganisation sich betätigt, indem dort ein fortwährendes Absterben ist, so daß das Seelische dort als solches sich ausleben kann, denn das Organische wird abgebaut.

[ 20 ] Wir haben dann gesehen, wie in der Drüsentätigkeit das Seelische in Anspruch nimmt das Körperliche, aber eben nur in beschränktem Maße, indem die Drüse dann Stoffe absondert. Aber in der Muskel- und Knochentätigkeit, da wird das Seelische ganz in Anspruch genommen vom Leiblichen. Ich habe ausdrücklich gesagt: Wir schwafeln nicht herum von einer abstrakten Wechselbeziehung zwischen Körper und Leib, und Seele und Geist, reden nicht von irgendeiner Beziehung des Physischen zu einem Psychoid, sondern schauen hinein, indem wir konkret die Seele erfassen, wie dieses Leiblich-Physische mit dem Seelischen überall sich durchsetzt, durchdringt. Und umgekehrt: Jetzt erleben wir es, wie das Geistige, das zunächst im Menschen nur in Bildern vorhanden ist, doch aber in unserem Physisch-Leiblichen drinnen lebt.

[ 21 ] Imagination, Inspiration, Intuition sind nicht irgend etwas, was man wie Wind, Wolken erfaßt, sondern sie sind das, was gerade in unserer Leibestätigkeit vorhanden ist, was da hinüberschlüpft, indem wir nur die Bilder vom Geistigen festhalten können.

[ 22 ] So kann man auch vordringen zu dem, was im Menschen das Geistige ist. Nach der Form, nach den Lebensstufen, nach dem Seeleninhalte, nach den geistigen Äußerungen oder geistigen Offenbarungen kann man den Menschen betrachten.

[ 23 ] Die Form des Menschen, sie ist zwar abhängig von dem ganzen Fixsternhimmel, sie tritt uns aber äußerlich sichtbarlich entgegen. Die Lebensstufen sind abhängig von der Planetensphäre. Sie können wir nicht unmittelbar mit dem gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein erblicken. Diese Lebensstufen erblicken wir, indem sie in den Formverhältnissen sich ausdrücken. Tief im Inneren des Menschen ruht das Seelische. Wir entdecken es, wenn wir die geheimnisvollen Zusammenhänge zwischen des Menschen Nerven-Sinnestätigkeit und dem Seelischen ins Auge fassen, wenn wir die Drüsentätigkeit ins Auge fassen im Verhältnis zum Fühlen und zu alledem, was auf der rhythmischen Tätigkeit beruht. Wir sahen dann, wie zusammenhängt das Seelische mit dem Stoffwechsel-Gliedmaßensystem. Aber dieses Seelische wird durchdrungen an dem einen Pol des Lebens von dem Geistigen, kann aber von ihm nur Bildhaftes erfassen und drängt hinunter die Imagination, Inspiration und Intuition in das Leiblich-Physische. Dann, wenn so der Geist sich in die Seele ergießt, lebt er in der Seele als das Intimste, das der Mensch hat.

[ 24 ] Der andere Pol zieht den Menschen nicht hinein in die Art und Weise, wie der Mensch von innen seine Sinnestätigkeit hat, wie der Mensch sein Vorstellen hat, sein Fühlen, wo der Mensch schon hinuntertaucht mit dem Geist in das Leibliche, in die Wirklichkeit zum Fühlen, wo tingiert ist mit den Inspirationen, die nun ihrerseits von oben wiederum die Imaginationen aufnehmen, das Leibliche mit dem Geistigen. Dieses kommt uns zum Ausdrucke, wenn wir sinnig den Menschen anschauen, der in voller Ruhe vor uns steht. Wenn wir studieren seine Physiognomie, wenn wir studieren, was aus ihm herausleuchtet, indem der Geist untertaucht in die Leiblichkeit, indem er die Inspiration in die Leiblichkeit hineinsendet, kommt dieser Geist wiederum an die Oberfläche, dringt durch die Lebensimpulse nach außen, gibt dem Menschen zunächst das Inkarnat, die Hautfleischfarbe, gibt dem Menschen, was er sonst als Physiognomie hat, erscheint uns in seiner edelgebauten Stirne, erscheint uns in seiner Mund- und Kinnbildung, in seiner Nasenbildung und so weiter. Dieser Geist, der als Inspiration untertaucht, erscheint uns, indem er durch die Lebensstufen wirkt, an dem ruhenden Menschen.

[ 25 ] Sobald der Mensch geht, sobald der Mensch tätig ist, ja wenn der Mensch nur mit den Augen zwinkert, dann ist es das, was der Mensch als Intuition hinübersendet vom Geist in das Leibliche; das ist das, was wir dann sehen. Bei einem Menschen, den wir im Gehen verfolgen, den wir im Gestikulieren verfolgen, bei dem verfolgen wir das Wirken seines Geistes, der aber intuitiv in dem Leib aufgeht, in dem er nicht als Geist anwesend ist, sondern als die Wärmebildungs-, als die chemischen Zersetzungsprozesse, die im Leibe vor sich gehen, wenn der Mensch tätig in der Welt wirksam ist.

[ 26 ] Indem wir die Form betrachtet haben, mußten wir hinweisen auf das, was die Welt dem Menschen gibt. Indem wir jetzt den Geist ganz untertauchen gesehen haben in die Leiblichkeit, finden wir in der Betätigung des Menschen, was der Mensch wiederum an die Welt hinausgibt. Es ist ein vollständiger Kreislauf vorhanden.

[ 27 ] Der Mensch wacht, indem er im Wachen Bilder erlebt, das heißt, er ist des Geistes teilhaftig. Aber er erkauft für das Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod diese Teilhaftigkeit am Geist, indem er den Geist nicht als Wirklichkeit, sondern als Bildhaftigkeit in sich hat. Der Mensch hat aber den Geist auch zwischen Geburt und Tod als Wirklichkeit in sich; aber er erkauft diese Wirklichkeit dadurch, daß er diese Wirklichkeit nur schlafend, sei es wachend schlafend, sei es wirklich schlafend, erlebt. Und man müßte eigentlich sagen: Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod besteht darin, daß der Mensch den Geist in Bildesabglanz erlebt, die Wirklichkeit aber nicht bewußt erlebt; sondern diese Wirklichkeit erscheint ihm nur durch das Medium der Leiblichkeit. Zwischen Geburt und Tod sehen wir den Geist durch seine Leiblichkeit. Wir sehen eigentlich nicht in Wirklichkeit Materie. Die Materie ist der äußere Schein des Geistes. Wir sehen den Geist von außen, indem wir Materie sehen. So daß wir sagen können: Sehen wir Materie, sei es Materie draußen in der Welt, sei es Materie am Menschen, dann ist es eigentlich immer so, daß die Wirklichkeit sich uns verbirgt und die Oberfläche uns erscheint, wo der Geist aus der leiblichen Wirklichkeit, aus der materiellen Wirklichkeit heraus sich offenbart.

[ 28 ] Anders ist es, wenn der Mensch des Geistes teilhaftig wird. Da bleibt ihm sein Leibliches, wie zum Beispiel das Innere seines Hauptes, ja auch das Äußere seines Hauptes, wenn er sich nicht just im Spiegel sieht, aber dann hat er auch nur ein Bild, das bleibt im Hintergrunde. Dagegen erlebt er wirklich den Geist, aber er erlebt den Geist nur im Bild. Im Bewußtsein sehen wir den Geist innerlich, aber im Bilde. Schlafend, auch wachend schlafend, nehmen wir den Geist in seinem Schaffen wahr, aber wir können die Wahrnehmung nicht in ihrer Wesenheit ins Bewußtsein hineinbringen; sie bleibt draußen.

[ 29 ] Deshalb müssen wir schon sagen, wenn wir irgendwo materielle Oberfläche wahrnehmen: dahinter ist der Geist. Wir können nur mit unserem Bewußtsein in diesen Geist nicht hinein. Wenn wir im gewöhnlichen Bewußtsein Geist erleben, müssen wir ihn innerlich erleben, aber wir erleben ihn eben nur im Bilde. Das ist eben der große Umschwung, der sich mit dem Menschen vollzieht: Mit dem Tode wird diese Wirklichkeit hier (auf die Zeichnung Seite 130, links, deutend) Bild, und die Bilder, die wir erleben (rechts, blau), die werden Wirklichkeit. Der Mensch beginnt, indem er durch die Pforte des Todes geht, das, was er vorher nur im Bilde wahrgenommen hat, als seine Wirklichkeit zu erleben, und was er vorher als Wirklichkeit verschlafen hat, das wird jetzt für ihn Bild - Bild, in dem sich allerdings vorbereitet das nächste Erdenleben, wo wiederum eine Umkehr stattfindet. Es ist also immer eine völlige Umkehr.

[ 30 ] Sehen Sie, wenn man des Menschen Formverhältnisse betrachtet, muß man weit hinausgehen, in die ganze Fixsternwelt muß man hinausgehen. Und wenn man in die ganze Fixsternwelt hinausgeht, dann liegen in der Fixsternwelt die Impulse, wie wir gesehen haben, die da bewirken, daß der Mensch gewisse Formen seines Hauptes, gewisse Formen seiner Brust, gewisse Formen seiner Gliedmaßen hat. Wir haben gesehen, wie diese zustande kommen. Wir gehen dann weiter an den Menschen heran: Wir finden das Planetensystem, die Planetensphäre. Und wiederum finden wir, daß diese Planetensphäre im Menschen seine Lebensstufen bildet. Jetzt müssen wir ganz in den Menschen hineingehen. Da finden wir sein Seelisches. Und wenn wir in dieses Seelische noch untertauchen, dann ergeben sich uns die Wechselzustände von Wachen und Schlafen, von Bild und Wirklichkeit. Dann kommen wir an den Geist des Menschen heran. Dann entdecken wir das Geistige des Menschen.

[ 31 ] Ich möchte Ihnen jetzt etwas vor die Seele hinstellen, was für viele von Ihnen vielleicht außerordentlich abstrakt und fremdartig erscheint. Aber ich bitte Sie, nehmen Sie es hin und betrachten Sie es als ein paar Nüsse, die Sie knacken müssen. Denn auch das, was ich heute in dieser rechts letzten Viertelstunde entwickeln will, kann Ihnen einmal wichtig sein für die Weltbetrachtung.

[ 32 ] Wenn wir diesen Weg uns wirklich vorhalten, den man da geht von dem ganzen Weltensystem, von dem Fixsternhimmel herein durch die Planetensphäre in den Menschen, da wird man, wenn man dazu in der Lage ist, an etwas ganz Bestimmtes erinnert. Sehen Sie, die Mathematiker, die bestimmen die Lage eines Körpers oder die Lage eines Punktes — das spielt eine große Rolle heute gerade in der Relativitätstheorie —, indem sie sich drei aufeinander senkrecht stehende Linien denken, die sich in irgendeinem Punkte schneiden. Und wenn sie dann einen Punkt bestimmen wollen, sagen wir hier den Punkt A (siehe Zeichnung), dann messen sie die Entfernung zu den drei Ebenen, die durch die drei Linien bestimmt sind. Wenn sie also diese drei Linien haben, so können sie immer den Punkt bestimmen. Sie müssen nur annehmen diese drei aufeinander senkrecht stehenden Achsen, die man Koordinatenachsen nennt, und sie können ihnen dienen als Anhaltspunkt zur Ortsbestimmung jeglichen anderen Punktes, auch jeglicher Linie, denn die kann wenigstens nur durch ihre Punkte bestimmt werden, die sie enthält und so weiter.

[ 33 ] Die Mathematiker sind nun außerordentlich stolz darauf, daß sie in einer solchen Weise die Ortsbestimmung mathematisch erfaßbar machen können. Sie reden von den drei Koordinaten, von der x-, y- und z-Koordinate. Nun entsteht aber für denjenigen, der nicht bloß Mathematiker, sondern der, indem er sich mit Mathematik beschäftigt hat, auch noch ein Mensch der Wirklichkeit ist, eine bestimmte Frage.

[ 34 ] Er sagt sich: In dem Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod — und unsere jetzigen Mathematiker rechnen ja wahrhaftig nicht mit dem Leben zwischen dem Tod und neuer Geburt, sondern was sie berechnen, das liegt alles zwischen Geburt und Tod -, in dem Leben zwischen Geburt und Tod ist man ja immer eigentlich als Mensch in der äußeren Wirklichkeit mit drinnen, und man sieht als Mensch, oder man nimmt es wahr durch einen anderen Sinn, von irgendeinem Punkte aus das, was in der Außenwelt ist. Man muß also immer beim Menschen von einem Blickpunkte, von einem Augenpunkte sprechen. Nicht wahr, die Welt schaut ganz anders aus, je nachdem ob ich nun hier stehe, oder ob ich da drüben stehe. Wenn ich da drüben stehe — nun, schon dadurch wäre ein beträchtlicher Unterschied, daß ich Ihnen von hier in die Augen schaue; wenn ich da drüben stünde, würde ich Sie alle von der anderen Seite sehen. Also man kann, wenn man konkret, wirklichkeitsgemäß spricht, immer nur von einem bestimmten Blickpunkte aus die Wirklichkeit beurteilen, denn der Mensch kann sich ja nirgends ganz wegnehmen von der Wirklichkeit.

[ 35 ] Aber im modernen Denken, da hat man so etwas von einer Sehnsucht, sich wegzunehmen aus der Wirklichkeit. Die Physiker wollen alles Subjektive ausschließen. Ein neuerer Physiker hat gesagt: Was ist eigentlich? Was hat ein Sein? — Sogar in der Sprache kommt das Sein vom Sehen, so daß man, wenn man den Menschen einschließt, eigentlich ganz populär sagen müßte: Es ist das, was man sehen kann. Denn der Stamm des Wortes Sein hängt mit Sehen zusammen. — Aber das kann der Physiker nicht gelten lassen, und ein neuerer Physiker hat deshalb schon die Definition gegeben: Dasjenige ist, was sich messen läßt — wobei man es also nicht auf den Menschen bezieht, sondern auf einen objektiven Maßstab, und den Menschen schaltet man aus.

[ 36 ] Ein anderes Beispiel, wo der Mensch ausgeschaltet wird, habe ich ja schon öfter vor Ihre Seele hingestellt. Da wird die Kant-Laplacesche Theorie erklärt: Man nimmt ein Tröpfchen Ol, ein Kartenblatt auf einer Stecknadel, es kann auch eine Nähnadel sein, man dreht, und da sondern sich die Tropfen ab. Aber — es würde sich nichts absondern, und das ganze kleine Planetensystem würde nicht entstehen, wenn der Herr Lehrer nicht drehte! Aber wenn man das Weltsystem erklären will, läßt man wiederum den Herrn Lehrer aus. Sonst müßte der Lehrer sagen: Liebe Kinder, da entsteht ein Planetensystem, aber da bin ich, der da dreht; und da draußen entsteht das große Planetensystem, da ist der große Gott vorhanden, der dreht da die große Stecknadel. Sonst könnte die Welt nicht entstehen, wenn da draußen nicht ein im Verhältnis großer Gott wäre, wie ich der kleine Gott für euch alle hier bin. — So müßte der Lehrer eigentlich sagen, nicht wahr.

[ 37 ] Nun, das sagt er nicht. Man ist gewohnt geworden im modernen Denken, den Blickpunkt gewissermaßen hinwegzudekretieren. Man dekretiert ihn sogar hier in der analytischen Geometrie weg. Aber es ist auch schwer, die Frage zu beantworten: Wo ist eigentlich derjenige, der das anschaut? Wo ist denn der, der das anschaut? Wo steckt denn der? Wer sieht denn wirklich das Ding hier so an, daß er nicht perspektivisch die x-, y-, z-Koordinate sieht? Wo steckt denn der Mensch, der das so sieht? — Ja, wissen Sie, da kann er nicht sein, da überall kann er nicht sein, denn da würde er immer perspektivisch sehen. Nun, wenn er gerade weit genug weg wäre, nämlich da im Unendlichen drüben, da würde er die vertikale Linie richtig sehen; wenn er da drüben im Unendlichen wäre; wenn er da droben im Unendlichen wäre, würde er die z-Linie sehen. Das muß nämlich ein ganz verflixter Kerl sein, der diese sogenannte Koordinatenachse sehen würde, die man für dieses hier (siehe Zeichnung Seite 132) in einem Punkt beschreibt; der muß nämlich in der Unendlichkeit sein, und zwar da, und da, und überall in der Unendlichkeit fort muß er sein. Das ist der Blickpunkt. Der muß überall sein, der da in diesem Raum alle richtigen drei Dimensionen betrachtet, die aufeinander senkrecht stehen. Wenn man vom Raume redet, ja, wenn man von analytischer Geometrie redet, so muß man den Blickpunkt überall ins Unendliche hin verlegen.

[ 38 ] Und jetzt nehmen wir den Gegensatz. Jetzt nehmen wir einmal, wie der Mensch nun wirklich innerlich sich erlebt. Er erlebt sich ja im Mittelpunkt des Weltenalls. Er erlebt sich gewissermaßen als Punkt, und überall mit seinen Wahrnehmungen visiert er eigentlich. Er hat gewissermaßen vor sich oder um sich seinen Horizont. Und was auf dem Horizont oder über dem Horizont und unter dem Horizont ist, das erlebt der Mensch so; wenn ich es Ihnen andeuten will, könnte ich das so andeuten. Ich müßte sagen: Der Mensch erlebt erstens in seiner Visierlinie — es kann auch die Tastlinie sein — oder irgendwo oben, unten, natürlich auch hier herüben; kurz, er macht diesen Winkel größer oder kleiner, oder öffnet ihn nach oben oder nach unten. Das tun auch die Mathematiker; nur da, da gehen sie aus von einem ganz bestimmten Blickpunkte. Da nehmen sie Rücksicht auf den Menschen. Sie geben es aber auch nicht zu, weil das eine Schande wäre für den heutigen Denker, wenn er den Menschen einschließen würde in das Weltenbild. Sie reden daher nur von einem Punkt, bestimmen einen anderen Punkt irgendwo, indem sie die Abweichung von der Visierlinie bestimmen. Indem man also sagt: der Punkt hier, der ist so entfernt, daß hier eine Möglichkeit ist — nun, ich will nicht so weit gehen, das, was man den Kosinus nennt, einzuführen —, daß man eine Möglichkeit hat, den Punkt zu bestimmen. Der aber ist immer anders, also auch sein Kosinus ist immer anders, indem man weiter oben oder unten den Punkt ins Auge faßt. Da steht man eigentlich, wenn man die Sache wirklich betrachtet, in der vollen Wirklichkeit drinnen. Die Mathematiker haben das. Sie nennen das Polarkoordinaten.

[ 39 ] Und jetzt, sehen Sie, jetzt haben wir einen merkwürdigen Satz. Wir können sagen: Da ist nun gar kein verflixter Kerl, denn das ist man selber fortwährend. Wenn man irgendwo ist, hat man den polaren Koordinatenmittelpunkt als Blickpunkt. Wenn man aber den Raum betrachtet, und eine Raumbetrachtung ist ja diese Betrachtung hier, dann ist man überall in der Unendlichkeit draußen. Da ist man der verflixte Kerl. Was ist denn aber, wenn Sie hier den Mittelpunkt betrachten, nun überall in der Unendlichkeit, was ist denn dazwischen drinnen? Was ist dazwischen drinnen? Zwischen dem Punkt und der Unendlichkeit ist nämlich zwischen drinnen der Kreis. Wenn Sie in die Unendlichkeit hinausgehen, also eigentlich den Raum durchmessen, Sie werden etwas darinnen finden. Aber wenn Sie sich den Blickpunkt in der Unendlichkeit überall denken, dann sind Sie in dem Gebiet, das die Fixsternbetrachtung ist. Wenn Sie hereingehen in den Mittelpunkt, da sind Sie in dem Gebiet, wo die menschliche Betrachtung ist. Zwischen drin ist der Kreis, oder kann wenigstens ein annähernder Kreis sein: die Planetenbewegungen. Es kann gar nicht anders sein. Wenn der Mensch durch seine Seele der Welt vermittelt wird, so muß diese Vermittelung durch eine Kreisbewegung, durch Sphären geschehen. Das ist einfach in der inneren Konstitution des Weltenalls begründet. Wir müssen also zwischen uns und der Unendlichkeit die kreisenden Sterne finden.

[ 40 ] Sehen Sie, in sehr alten Zeiten hat ein instinktives Hellsehen die Mathematik aus diesen Verhältnissen herausgeholt, aus den konkreten Verhältnissen heraus: den Weltenraum in drei Dimensionen mit dem Blickpunkte überall in der Unendlichkeit, die Sphäre und den eigenen Mittelpunkt. Davon ist man ausgegangen. Das war alte Mathematik. Heute ist die Mathematik auch abstrakt geworden und handelt eigentlich nur von Formeln, nicht von der Wirklichkeit. Aber wenn man sie innerlich betrachtet, so wie wir das jetzt getan haben, dann kann man noch eine Ahnung bekommen, wie das, was der Mathematiker heute vor sich hinzustellen gezwungen ist, das Koordinatenachsensystem oder die Polarkoordinaten, wie das durchaus in der inneren Struktur des Weltenalls begründet ist.

[ 41 ] Sehen Sie, Sie werden fast immer, wenn der Einstein oder ein Einsteinianer heute zu reden beginnt, finden: den Ausgangspunkt nehmen sie von irgendwelcher Koordinatenkonstruktion, und dann gehen sie über zu der Relativitätstheorie. Man braucht sich nicht darüber zu wundern, daß da alles relativ wird. Denn sobald man den ersten Ansatz macht - und den möchten nämlich die Leute machen -, zu der Wirklichkeit überzugehen, dann muß man sich verwandeln oder müßte sich verwandeln in den verflixten Kerl, der überall in der Unendlichkeit ist. Aber da kommt es schon nicht darauf an, ob es eine Meile oder mehr oder weniger, oder einen Erden- oder Sonnendurchmesser weit oder noch weiter voneinander ist. Daher werden alle Dinge relativ. Daher die Relativitätstheorie, weil der Blickpunkt im Unendlichen liegt, und es darauf nicht ankommt, ob weit oder weniger weit. Da wird dann, wenn man rein schaut auf die willkürlich angeführten Gründe, alles relativ. Das ist eigentlich der wahre Grund, der psychologische Grund. Man muß nur in diese Dinge hineinsehen.

[ 42 ] Nun wollen wir morgen auf den Voraussetzungen, die wir heute gewonnen haben, einiges wiederum aufbauen.

Eighteenth Lecture

[ 1 ] We have considered the human being in his relationship to the cosmos in terms of the form of human organization, in terms of the stages of life, in terms of the contents of the soul, and today, in order to prepare, as it were, another chapter for the next two days, we want to consider the spiritual experiences of the human being.

[ 2 ] Let us recall how we set out to consider the human being in relation to the formation of his organism. We had to relate the human organization to the cosmos, up to the fixed stars. Then, in order to consider the stages of human life, we had to we had to place the planetary system in which human beings live before our souls. And when we then moved on to the soul phenomena, we had to make a kind of shift and relate human beings as soul beings to their physical organization, that is, to what they have through the fixed starry sky and the planetary system. And through the consideration of form, through the consideration of life, we have also placed before our souls the opposites that exist in the head organization, in the chest organization, and in the metabolism-limb organization in the human being. We have seen how the soul, as sensory perception and imagination, lives out its life precisely through the head organization, through the sensory-nervous organization, and we have then seen how the life of feeling finds expression through the respiratory and circulatory organization, and the life of the will through the metabolic-limb system. However, in order to consider the soul, we had to take into account how the ego, the astral body, the etheric body, and the physical body interact in the human being.

[ 3 ] So that last time we really got an overview of the interweaving of the soul and the body, down to the activity of the glands and the use of muscle activity by the will.

[ 4 ] If we now want to come to the spiritual in the human being, we cannot simply look at the human being as we did last time with regard to the soul, where we had to take into account the expression, the revelation of this soul in the physical, but if we want to consider the spiritual, we must look at the changing states of the human being, at waking and sleeping.

[ 5 ] We know that waking and sleeping are given to us as human beings in the oscillation of human life within the twenty-four hours of daily wakefulness and nighttime sleep. This is one way in which human beings live in waking and sleeping. But we also know that human beings exist in other ways while awake and asleep. For when human beings imagine and give themselves over to sensory perceptions, only then are they actually fully awake. Only the life of imagination and sensory perception is actually waking life. In contrast, the life of the will and the life of action are actually a life of sleep, even during waking hours.

[ 6 ] As we know, emotional life is a dream life even during waking hours. So in this respect, too, human beings allow their lives to swing back and forth between waking and sleeping. Sleeping, or rather waking sleep, plays a role in our real waking life, that is, in our life of imagination, when we express an act of will, when we are active, awake in our activity because we can imagine our own activity. But what goes on in this activity remains as unconscious as the states during sleep.

[ 7 ] But the fact that human beings feel themselves to be individual beings is actually due to sleep. If human beings were only awake and devoted to their imaginative life, they would experience the world as a sequence of images. They would feel as if they were at rest, as if they were suspended at a point in the universe, and the universe would exist in images. In the weaving of images, the I would also exist as a kind of mirror image of something, but only as an image. It is only because we pour into this waking life of imagination, first of all, the constant memory that we actually have states in which we experience nothing, states of sleep, the time from falling asleep to waking up, that we are led back to ourselves. And also the vague awareness of what we want, that is, that something sleep-like plays into our conscious existence, gives us our sense of self, our ego impulse. We do not experience it fully consciously in ordinary life; we experience it, as it were, as a jolt into consciousness coming from our organization, this ego impulse. And we experience it on the other hand by the fact that from the moment we fall asleep until we wake up, we go out into the cosmos with our ego, which otherwise does not enter into ordinary consciousness, and with our astral body, which also does not enter into ordinary consciousness, and that this, in a sense, strikes into our consciousness, which we experience as a darkening of this consciousness from falling asleep to waking up.

[ 8 ] What is it that always puts us back to sleep, that pushes our will and a large part of our feelings into unconsciousness, into the night of consciousness, so to speak? It is because we must develop organic activity in our will. Last time, we saw how human beings allow their soul life to influence their muscular life through their will. The soul, so to speak, submerges into the life of the muscles. There it becomes unconscious, just as it becomes unconscious when it leaves the body and remains in the state between falling asleep and waking up. We can therefore say that it is due to the needs and conditions of the physical body that we are initially conscious of our ego in ordinary life. it comes from the fact that we carry a body with us which, when will must be carried out, claims the soul for itself, which, when it wants to balance the forces it develops in the will, drives the soul down into the unconsciousness of sleep in order to be able to always fully mediate the consciousness of the actually unconsciously existing ego. So we can say that we immerse ourselves in the physical body by pouring our spirit, or initially our soul, into this physical body. But we will soon see that it is precisely with this soul that we pour our spirit into the physical body. I would say that we feel robust when the soul is poured into the body. We do not feel robust, but awake, when we have ideas and sensory perceptions.

[ 9 ] But having ideas and sensory perceptions does not mean living in the body. It is a complete misunderstanding to believe that only imaginative, inspired, and intuitive knowledge lead human beings into the spiritual world. No, human beings already live in the spiritual world when they have sensory perceptions and when they form ideas. For we have seen that sensory perceptions are linked to the fact that dead matter, purely physical apparatus, is already stored in our organism, which is only permeated by the etheric body; but it is stored there. And by experiencing this physical apparatus, we experience sensory perception. The physical apparatus is not experienced; what is experienced is the spiritual activity that takes place within it. In its essence, the content of sensory perception is entirely spiritual. However, as we saw last time, in our imagination we spread the sensory activity, as it were, over the nervous system. Nervous activity actually consists in a dying off. Organic activity must be switched off if we want to imagine. Therefore, by having sensory perceptions and ideas, we live entirely in the spiritual realm. But we live as human beings who live between birth and death, living this life in the spiritual realm by having only images of it, of this life. This is what is peculiar about the spiritual: it first becomes conscious to us in sensory perceptions and in ideas, but only in images. So we can say (see illustration on page 127): sensory perceptions and ideas are spiritual experiences, but in images. We are aware that ideas have an abstract character; they are not intensely saturated images. One might say that everything becomes gray when we move from sensory perceptions to the life of ideas. But it only becomes gray for our consciousness. In reality, all the ideas that human beings develop contain imaginations.

[ 10 ] So I can say: ideas definitely contain imaginations, but these imaginations do not come to consciousness. It is, in a sense, a kind of extract from these imaginations that we have as ideas in ordinary life. Imagination goes backwards into the physical, and what comes to our consciousness is the pale image of the ideas that has been thrown back. Every time you have an idea, and constantly, whenever you have ideas, you also have imaginations. It is just that the ideas remain in consciousness; the imaginations slip away and live in the general vitality of your organism, in the general life activity. So the imaginations slip into vitality, into general life activity. If I were to draw this schematically (see drawing), I would have to draw it like this (head): We have sensory perception (red), then we have the activity of imagination, which we form (blue, green) from sensory perception and which actually has a Janus face. At the front, it is the pale idea that comes into our consciousness; behind it is imagination, but imagination does not enter consciousness. Imagination sinks into the organism and forms the general life activity there. It enters all organs, this imagination, it lives in the brain, it lives in the heart, it lives in the lungs, it lives in the kidneys, it lives everywhere, it enters all organs, this imagination. It unites with the general life force.

[ 11 ] This gives rise to something peculiar: where I have drawn red and blue, we have the spirit in the picture. We have no awareness of what extends down into the physical body, but we experience it as spiritual. The spirit is, so to speak, spirit in the foreground; in the background, within the organism (green), it is soul. But in the soul, it immediately begins to submerge into the semi-conscious and unconscious and unites with the physical body.

[ 12 ] Below what we have here (see drawing), we have unconscious soul activity. This is where imagination disappears. And then we have physicality on the other side. But this physicality is immersed in the night of consciousness, in sleep, and expresses itself only by sending the will up into consciousness. This will is precisely the counterforce; it makes us robust, it gives us the experience of reality. But this experience of reality arises at most as a feeling. We dream of this reality, but essentially we do not have this reality in our waking consciousness. Thus, as human beings between birth and death, we purchase our existence in the spiritual realm by experiencing the spirit in images, in the images of sensory perceptions, in the images of ideas; we experience reality, but it plays into our consciousness unconsciously, just as external reality plays into it unconsciously.

[ 13 ] We immerse ourselves in this external reality, but because we know nothing of the states of sleep in which we are outside of external reality, it also plays into our consciousness unconsciously. We are, in a sense, enveloped by the unconscious, permeated by the unconscious. There we live in reality. But we live in the physical or in the external-physical. By living in the spiritual, we experience the spirit only as an image.

[ 14 ] But everything physical is built up from the spiritual. And when a person develops their imagination, they already experience the imaginative life that lies behind them. They also experience, further back in the soul, what is present in ordinary consciousness as feeling. They experience the feeling consciously at first. But behind the feeling is inspiration.

[ 15 ] Every time you have a feeling, you also have inspiration. But just as when you imagine something, the imaginings slide down into your general vitality, so when you feel, inspiration slides down into your physicality, because you need it there. You need it for breathing, for rhythmic activity. There, it connects with the general rhythmic activity. So the inspiration from your feelings slips into your breathing processes in the same way that the imagination slips into your general vitality from your ideas.

[ 16 ] So I can say: We continue to experience feelings within ourselves, and by immersing ourselves further in these feelings, we have soul experience, soul experience, but dreaming — yet within this we have a hidden inspiration (see drawing on page 125). A hidden inspiration slips into the rhythmic movement, rhythmic activity. It slips down into the breathing and blood circulation. If you were to look at a person in front of you who is thinking and feeling, you could say: You now have ideas, you are thinking, you know that; but from your thinking, imaginations are constantly dripping down through your whole body and sustaining your vitality. You feel; there, inspirations are constantly dripping into your breathing and into your blood circulation.

[ 17 ] And beneath that lies the will. The will is initially, within the life activity of the human being between birth and death, a purely physical activity, to be experienced physically, because the spirit is occupied by the muscular activity of physical experience, but it is asleep, because only the spirit can be experienced consciously. Here it sleeps. But inside there is intuition. What I described last time is real intuition, where the human being sends his soul activity and thus also the spiritual that he experiences in images to his muscular activity, so that he becomes active, so that he becomes an actor, a willing being. There he truly intuits. He steps out of his ego-life and lets this ego enter into something completely different, namely into his own muscle and bone movements. So we can say that intuition slips into metabolic and motor activity. But the spirit lives in imagination, inspiration, and intuition.

Sensory perceptions,
Ideas: Spiritual experience, but in images,
Imaginations slip into vitality

Feelings: Emotional experience, but dreaming,
Inspiration slips into rhythmic activity

Will: Physical experience, but sleeping,
intuition slips into metabolic and movement activity

[ 18 ] You see, now we have the mind completely inside the body. We have intuition in our metabolism and in the movement of our limbs. We have inspiration in rhythmic activity. We have imagination in our general vitality. And only objective knowledge do we have as imagery, as spiritual activity in images. Because they are mere images, they can also unite with the images of the external world.

[ 19 ] Last time, we tried to think of the soul and the body together. We saw how the soul works in the head, in the nerve-sense organization, through a continuous dying off, so that the soul can live out its life there as such, because the organic is broken down.

[ 20 ] We then saw how, in glandular activity, the soul makes demands on the physical, but only to a limited extent, in that the gland then secretes substances. But in muscle and bone activity, the soul is completely taken up by the physical. I have expressly said: We do not ramble on about an abstract interrelationship between body and physical body, soul and spirit, we do not talk about some relationship between the physical and a psychoid, but we look inside, by grasping the soul in concrete terms, how this physical body pervades and penetrates the soul everywhere. And vice versa: Now we experience how the spiritual, which at first is only present in images in human beings, nevertheless lives within our physical body.

[ 21 ] Imagination, inspiration, and intuition are not something that can be grasped like wind or clouds, but are what is present in our bodily activity, what slips away when we can only hold on to the images of the spiritual.

[ 22 ] In this way, we can also advance to what is spiritual in human beings. We can view human beings according to their form, their stages of life, the contents of their souls, their spiritual expressions, or their spiritual revelations.

[ 23 ] The form of the human being is dependent on the entire fixed starry sky, but it appears to us externally and visibly. The stages of life are dependent on the planetary sphere. We cannot perceive them directly with our ordinary consciousness. We perceive these stages of life through their expression in the relationships between forms. Deep within the human being lies the soul. We discover it when we consider the mysterious connections between the human nervous and sensory activity and the soul, when we consider the activity of the glands in relation to feeling and to everything that is based on rhythmic activity. We then saw how the soul is connected to the metabolic-limb system. But this soul is permeated at one pole of life by the spirit, which can only grasp images, and pushes down imagination, inspiration, and intuition into the physical body. Then, when the spirit pours into the soul in this way, it lives in the soul as the most intimate thing that human beings have.

[ 24 ] The other pole does not draw man into the way in which man has his sensory activity from within, the way in which man has his imagination, his feeling, where man already descends with his spirit into the physical, into reality in order to feel, where it is tinged with the inspirations which in turn take up the imaginations from above, the physical with the spiritual. This becomes clear to us when we look meaningfully at a person standing before us in complete calm. When we study their physiognomy, when we study what shines out of them as the spirit descends into the physical body, sending inspiration into the physical body, this spirit comes to the surface again, penetrates outward through the life impulses, and gives the human being first of all the incarnate, the skin color, gives the human being what he otherwise has as physiognomy, appears to us in his nobly built forehead, appears to us in the formation of his mouth and chin, in the formation of his nose, and so on. This spirit, which submerges as inspiration, appears to us as it works through the stages of life in the resting human being.

[ 25 ] As soon as a person walks, as soon as a person is active, indeed, when a person merely blinks their eyes, then it is what the person sends over as intuition from the spirit into the physical body; that is what we then see. When we follow a person walking, when we follow them gesturing, we follow the workings of their spirit, which, however, intuitively merges into the body, where it is not present as spirit, but as the processes of heat generation and chemical decomposition that take place in the body when the person is active in the world.

[ 26 ] Having considered the form, we had to point out what the world gives to the human being. Now that we have seen the spirit completely submerged in physicality, we find in the activity of the human being what the human being in turn gives back to the world. A complete cycle exists.

[ 27 ] Human beings wake up by experiencing images while awake, that is, they participate in the spirit. But they pay for this participation in the spirit between birth and death by having the spirit within themselves not as reality but as imagery. However, humans also have the spirit within them as reality between birth and death; but they pay for this reality by experiencing it only while asleep, whether awake or truly asleep. And one would actually have to say: Life between birth and death consists in the fact that human beings experience the spirit in pictorial reflections, but do not consciously experience reality; rather, this reality appears to them only through the medium of physicality. Between birth and death, we see the spirit through its physicality. We do not actually see matter in reality. Matter is the outer appearance of the spirit. We see the spirit from outside by seeing matter. So we can say: When we see matter, whether it is matter outside in the world or matter in human beings, then it is actually always the case that reality is hidden from us and the surface appears to us, where the spirit reveals itself from physical reality, from material reality.

[ 28 ] It is different when a person participates in the spirit. His physical body remains, such as the inside of his head, and even the outside of his head, unless he looks at himself in a mirror, but then he only has an image, which remains in the background. In contrast, he truly experiences the spirit, but he experiences the spirit only in images. In consciousness, we see the spirit internally, but in images. When we are asleep, even when we are awake but asleep, we perceive the spirit in its activity, but we cannot bring this perception into our consciousness in its essence; it remains outside.

[ 29 ] That is why we must say, when we perceive a material surface somewhere: behind it is the spirit. We cannot enter this spirit with our consciousness alone. When we experience spirit in ordinary consciousness, we must experience it inwardly, but we experience it only in images. This is precisely the great transformation that takes place with human beings: with death, this reality here (pointing to the drawing on page 130, left) becomes an image, and the images we experience (right, blue) become reality. By passing through the gate of death, the human being begins to experience as reality what he previously perceived only in images, and what he previously slept through as reality now becomes an image for him — an image in which, however, the next earthly life is being prepared, where another reversal takes place. So it is always a complete reversal.

[ 30 ] You see, when you look at the proportions of human beings, you have to go far out, you have to go out into the whole world of fixed stars. And when you go out into the whole world of fixed stars, then, as we have seen, the impulses lie in the world of fixed stars that cause human beings to have certain forms of their head, certain forms of their chest, certain forms of their limbs. We have seen how these come about. We then go further toward human beings: we find the planetary system, the planetary sphere. And again we find that this planetary sphere forms the stages of life in the human being. Now we must go completely into the human being. There we find his soul. And when we dive even deeper into this soul, we discover the alternating states of waking and sleeping, of image and reality. Then we come to the spirit of the human being. Then we discover the spiritual in the human being.

[ 31 ] I would now like to present something to your soul that may seem extremely abstract and strange to many of you. But I ask you to accept it and consider it as a few nuts that you have to crack. For what I want to develop today in this last quarter of an hour may one day be important for your view of the world.

[ 32 ] If we really consider this path that we are taking, from the entire world system, from the fixed starry sky through the planetary sphere into the human being, then, if we are able to do so, we are reminded of something very specific. You see, mathematicians determine the position of a body or the position of a point — which plays a major role today, especially in the theory of relativity — by imagining three lines perpendicular to each other that intersect at some point. And if they then want to determine a point, let's say point A here (see drawing), they measure the distance to the three planes determined by the three lines. So once they have these three lines, they can always determine the point. They just have to assume these three perpendicular axes, which are called coordinate axes, and they can use them as a reference point for determining the location of any other point, or any line, because that can at least be determined by the points it contains, and so on.

[ 33 ] Mathematicians are now extremely proud that they can make location mathematically comprehensible in this way. They talk about the three coordinates, the x, y, and z coordinates. But now a certain question arises for those who are not merely mathematicians, but who, having studied mathematics, are also human beings living in reality.

[ 34 ] They say to themselves: In the life between birth and death — and our present-day mathematicians certainly do not reckon with the life between death and rebirth, but what they calculate lies entirely between birth and death — in the life between birth and death, one is always actually present as a human being in external reality, and as a human being, one sees, or perceives through another sense, from some point, what is in the external world. So when speaking of human beings, one must always speak of a viewpoint, of a point of view. Isn't it true that the world looks completely different depending on whether I am standing here or over there? If I am standing over there — well, just that alone would make a considerable difference, because I am looking at you from here; if I were standing over there, I would see you all from the other side. So, if you speak concretely and realistically, you can only ever judge reality from a certain point of view, because human beings cannot completely remove themselves from reality.

[ 35 ] But in modern thinking, there is a kind of longing to remove oneself from reality. Physicists want to exclude everything subjective. A recent physicist said: What actually is? What has existence? — Even in language, existence comes from seeing, so that if you include human beings, you would actually have to say, quite popularly: It is what you can see. For the root of the word “being” is related to “seeing.” — But physicists cannot accept this, and a recent physicist has therefore already given the definition: That which can be measured is what is — whereby one does not refer to humans, but to an objective standard, and humans are excluded.

[ 36 ] I have often presented you with another example where humans are excluded. The Kant-Laplace theory is explained: you take a drop of oil, a piece of card on a pin, it could also be a sewing needle, you turn it, and the drops separate. But — nothing would separate, and the whole little planetary system would not come into being if the teacher did not turn it! But if you want to explain the world system, you leave out the teacher again. Otherwise, the teacher would have to say: “Dear children, there is a planetary system, but I am the one who is turning it; and out there is the great planetary system, where the great God is turning the big pin.” Otherwise, the world could not come into being if there were not a relatively large God out there, just as I am the little God for all of you here. — That is what the teacher would actually have to say, wouldn't he?

[ 37 ] Well, he doesn't say that. In modern thinking, we have become accustomed to decreeing the point of view away, as it were. We even decree it away here in analytical geometry. But it is also difficult to answer the question: Where is the person who is looking at this? Where is the person who is looking at this? Where is he? Who is really looking at this thing in such a way that he does not see the x, y, and z coordinates in perspective? Where is the person who sees it this way? — Yes, you know, he can't be there, he can't be anywhere there, because then he would always see things in perspective. Well, if he were far enough away, namely over there in infinity, then he would see the vertical line correctly; if he were over there in infinity; if he were up there in infinity, he would see the z-line. He would have to be a very clever fellow to see this so-called coordinate axis, which is described here (see drawing on page 132) as a point; he would have to be in infinity, there and there and everywhere in infinity. That is the viewpoint. He must be everywhere, observing all three correct dimensions in this space, which are perpendicular to each other. When one speaks of space, yes, when one speaks of analytical geometry, one must shift the viewpoint everywhere into infinity.

[ 38 ] And now let us take the opposite. Let us take, for example, how human beings actually experience themselves internally. They experience themselves at the center of the universe. They experience themselves, so to speak, as a point, and they actually perceive everything around them. They have, so to speak, their horizon in front of them or around them. And what is on the horizon or above the horizon and below the horizon is what the human being experiences; if I wanted to indicate this to you, I could do so as follows. I would have to say: The human being experiences first of all in his line of sight — it can also be the line of touch — or somewhere above, below, and of course also over here; in short, they make this angle larger or smaller, or open it upwards or downwards. Mathematicians do the same thing; only there, they start from a very specific point of view. They take the human being into account. But they don't admit it, because it would be a disgrace for today's thinkers to include the human being in their world view. They therefore only talk about one point, determine another point somewhere else by determining the deviation from the line of sight. So by saying: the point here is so far away that there is a possibility — well, I don't want to go so far as to introduce what is called the cosine — that one has a possibility of determining the point. But that is always different, so its cosine is also always different, depending on whether one looks at the point further up or further down. If one really looks at it, one is actually standing in the full reality. Mathematicians have this. They call it polar coordinates.

[ 39 ] And now, you see, we have a strange proposition. We can say: There is no damn fellow, because that is what you are yourself, all the time. When you are somewhere, you have the polar coordinate center as your point of view. But if you look at space, and this is what we are doing here, then you are everywhere in infinity. There you are, the damn fellow. But what if you look at the center here, now everywhere in infinity, what is in between? What is in between? Between the point and infinity is the circle. If you go out into infinity, that is, if you actually measure the space, you will find something inside. But if you imagine the viewpoint everywhere in infinity, then you are in the area that is the observation of fixed stars. If you go into the center, you are in the area where human observation is. Between them is the circle, or at least an approximate circle: the movements of the planets. It cannot be otherwise. If human beings are mediated to the world through their souls, then this mediation must take place through a circular movement, through spheres. This is simply based on the inner constitution of the universe. We must therefore find the circling stars between ourselves and infinity.

[ 40 ] You see, in very ancient times, an instinctive clairvoyance extracted mathematics from these relationships, from concrete relationships: the world space in three dimensions with viewpoints everywhere in infinity, the sphere and its own center. That was the starting point. That was ancient mathematics. Today, mathematics has also become abstract and is really only concerned with formulas, not reality. But if you look at it internally, as we have just done, then you can still get an idea of how what mathematicians are forced to present today, the coordinate axis system or polar coordinates, is thoroughly grounded in the inner structure of the universe.

[ 41 ] You see, almost every time Einstein or an Einsteinian starts talking today, you will find that they take their starting point from some kind of coordinate construction and then move on to the theory of relativity. It is not surprising that everything becomes relative. For as soon as one makes the first attempt—and that is what people want to do—to move over to reality, one must transform oneself or would have to transform oneself into the confounded fellow who is everywhere in infinity. But it doesn't matter whether it's a mile or more or less, or the diameter of the Earth or the Sun, or even further apart. That's why all things become relative. That's why we have the theory of relativity, because the point of view lies in infinity, and it doesn't matter whether it's far or less far. If you look closely at the arbitrarily cited reasons, everything becomes relative. That is actually the real reason, the psychological reason. You just have to look into these things.

[ 42 ] Tomorrow, we want to build on the foundations we have laid today.