The Rudolf Steiner Archive

To the branch:

Most honored Sir!

By the deed of foundation of July 22, 1902, President H.S. Olcott has approved the founding of a German section of the “Theosophical Society”. He also instructed me by a special letter (dated July 22) to take the initiative in founding this section.

It is understandable that I myself, at this moment of foundation, feel compelled to address a few words to the brothers in the branches. This is all the more understandable as I have every reason to say how aware I am that the prospect of the post of Secretary General has given me a very special trust. I am also aware of the great responsibility that this office places on me.

I had to do some serious soul-searching when I was asked to take up the post. Above all, I had to ask myself whether I was allowed to accept such an office, given my short affiliation with the Theosophical Society.

My reasons cannot be misunderstood by the Theosophists to whom I speak. The time when I joined the “Theosophical Society” was for me the end point of many years of inner development. I joined no earlier than when I knew that the spiritual forces I had to serve were present in the “Theosophical Society”. And from that moment on, it was completely clear to me that I should belong to the Theosophical Society. I did not need to say that if the members of the German branches of the “Theosophical Society” consider me worthy, I not only may, but must follow their call. To the Theosophists I say that my personality is no more decisive for my decision in this direction than it will ever be in the future in the conduct of my office. I want to “serve” in the sense that one of our best German Theosophists will express in a forthcoming writing.

For those who have only recently joined the “Theosophical Society”, especially for those who are still doubtful in themselves whether it is the right thing to join our Society, which H. $. Olcott founded in association with H. P. Blavatsky, and at the head of which the former still stands; or whether it is not better, or just as good, to join another so-called “Theosophical Society”; for them I remark the following. The proof that we as the German section of the “Theosophical Society” will achieve what every true Theosophist wants to achieve - more or less consciously - can only be provided by our future work. In this respect, joining us is certainly a matter of trust for many at present. I myself know that there are forces within the “Theosophical Society” to achieve what we are striving for. I have known this since I joined, and my presence at the last annual meeting (July 1902) in London, where I was able to approach the leading personalities, was a new affirmation for me.

Whether we will achieve what we are called to do within the German-speaking population will depend on the trust that will be placed in us, and no less on how our work is received. We ourselves will serve no one other than the spiritual powers that guide us. What we have to give in our “service” cannot be revealed by the day, but only by time.

Just one more word. If the German section of the “Theosophical Society” is to accomplish what it is called upon to do in view of the present spiritual conditions and the “signs of the times” in German-speaking regions, then it needs a Theosophical monthly. It will be my task to establish such a publication. I can only give the assurance here that I see the necessity of such a journal, and ask you all to accept this journal as the organ of the German section of the “Theosophical Society”.

With the highest esteem and fraternal greetings
Dr. Rudolf Steiner
Friedenau-Berlin, Kaiserallee 95

Dear Sir and dear Brother!

President Olcott requests that I send him a detailed statistical report on the situation of the German section immediately. I therefore ask you to report to me as soon as possible on the following:

1. What are the names of the members of your branch?
2. What writings have been published by these members since October 1, 1901?
3. Who are the functionaries of your branch?

In faith
Your most humble
Dr. Rudolf Steiner

Lecture by Rudolf Steiner at the Giordano Bruno League

Dr. Steiner begins by saying that in the current state of German intellectual life, a man who is worldly-wise in the ordinary sense would not speak publicly on such a topic, because there is hardly any other that would be so likely to compromise him, and then continues: “Theosophy is a name often claimed by people who want to explore their destiny in spiritualistic circles. And yet, even though it has a whiff of fraudulence about it, I am fully aware of the topic when discussing its connection to German intellectual life. I much preferred being in my chemical laboratory to being in any spiritualist circle, and I know that one can get one's hands dirty in such circles, but I have also washed my hands and hope that I will be able to give you an understanding of the word theosophy as a serious worldview. It must be clearly stated that a serious world view can only be sought on the basis of modern natural science. I will never deviate from the idea that only in it is salvation to be found. But science still fills hearts and minds with its materialistic philosophy, and even if individual enthusiasts claim that we have long since passed the age of Büchner and so forth, if we

the materialism of the 1850s will continue to conquer the world. Almost all natural scientists of the present day are materialists, even if they deny it.

Natural science has shown us how gradually beings came into existence and perfected themselves until man appeared. But here, according to Haeckel in the 22nd link of his organic ancestral series, it stopped. David Friedrich Strauß praised the fact that natural science has freed us from miracles, from the miracle in the sense in which Linné said in the 18th century: “

How can we restore the harmony that existed for the ancient religions, and even for the early Middle Ages? With St. Augustine, this discord gradually emerged, leading to the two great dualistic currents in the contrast between scholasticism and Galileo and so on. Science was like a son who returns home from abroad and can no longer be understood by his father, and Protestantism is nothing more than the father's declaration that he wants to disinherit the son, and Kantianism is the conclusion, the last phase of this process!

The first great attempt to overcome this dichotomy was made by the German idealist philosophers Fichte, Schelling and Hegel. Three years after Hegel's death, Fichte's son published a book on human self-knowledge. It deals with this as a task that natural science itself has set. I.H. Fichte says something like: When we observe natural beings, we see their eternal laws. But when we regard the human soul itself as a natural process, we are faced with a change in our understanding. The laws of nature lie outside our personality in the natural basis from which we have emerged, but in our soul we do not see finished natural laws; we are natural law ourselves. There nature becomes our own deed, there we are development. We do not merely recognize, we live. We now have the task of creating eternal iron laws, no longer merely recognizing them. I.H. Fichte then suggests: at this point, man not only lives in his knowledge of nature, at this point he realizes and lives the divine, the creative, at this point philosophy passes over into theosophy!

This is how the concept of theosophy appears in German intellectual life. We can now perhaps see more clearly that theosophy is nothing other than the ultimate demand of a true monism between knowledge of nature and knowledge of the self. This gives us a perspective for reconciling the contradictions between religion and science. We now know that there is no other divine power that can elevate the worm to man; we know that we ourselves are this divine power.

One may ask: But what is the use of such knowledge? Well, I would reply, what significance does the simple recording of facts have, which is usually called knowledge? Those who I would call cosmic loafers are satisfied with that.

Those who understand the concept of theosophy in this way will also understand Fewerbach, who says that man has created God in his own image. We are quite willing to admit that the concept of God is born of the human heart, and that God, as a symbol of an inner ideal, can develop man beyond man.

In this way we shall gain a divine wisdom that will express the divinity of nature. We are now living in a time that could become an important turning-point in the spiritual development of Europe, as it was for the age in which Copernicus, Giordano Bruno and Galileo lived and founded modern natural science. But the latter has not known how to celebrate its reconciliation with religion. We are faced with this task, we must fulfill it. No matter how inadequate these attempts may be, there are currents in modern intellectual life that are moving in this direction. Religions are not founded as such, and so there are no religious geniuses in the sense that there are scientific and artistic geniuses. But there are personalities who express the content of knowledge of their time as religious feeling. I am well aware of the great defects and errors of the theosophical movement. Duboc has called theosophy a feminine philosophy. We can change that by making it a masculine one in critical Germany.

I know that there can be no salvation outside of science, but we must find new methods of soul research based on natural science in order to do what all the old religious views were able to do: establish a great unity between religious need and science. Theosophy in the sense I have characterized it has nothing to do with the reports of facts of hypnotism and somnambulism that are often lumped together with it; indeed, one could reject these and still be a theosophist, but these appearances of abnormal mental life are not to be rejected at all, and in the scientific interpretation of these facts, undertaken particularly by French and English scholars, I see the first tentative attempts at real soul research.

Dr. Steiner concluded his programmatic lecture with a reference to a painting by the Belgian Wiertz, “Man of the Future”. It shows a giant holding cannons and other attributes of the culture of our time, smiling as he shows them to his wife and children, who have shrunk to the size of pygmies in comparison. It will be our task to ensure that we do not appear so pygmy-like in front of the man of the future.

First, O. Lehmann-Rußbüldt gave a lecture on Dr. Steiner's lecture for orientation purposes, adding that it was his personal wish that not only the 250 to 300 listeners to the lecture would have been present, but also the 2000 to 3000 people who make up the spiritual public life in Germany. Dr. Steiner's call to make theosophy, if it is a female philosophy according to Duboc, into a male one in critical Germany, should be underlined thickly, so that it would take up a whole page in print, because there is certainly no small danger in the theosophical movement. The speaker acknowledged that, despite electricity and precision mechanics, our intellectual culture could be called crude compared to the harmony that existed between science and religion in the great cultures of antiquity, but, he added emphatically, we do not want to despair of ourselves because of that. The obvious superiority of our intelligence, as it manifests itself in the machine age, could be a guarantee that we will deepen and expand what the culture of antiquity only had a presentiment of, albeit in the most magnificent way. To this end, the speaker quoted a passage from Count Gobineau's racial work about the spiritual disposition of the Aryan, which can certainly also be applied to the peoples of the Atlantic world, i.e. Western Europe and North America:

"The Aryan is thus superior to other men mainly to the extent of his intelligence and energy, and thanks to these two abilities, if he succeeds in conquering his passions and his material needs , he is likewise granted the ability to achieve an infinitely higher morality, although in the ordinary course of things one can find as many reprehensible actions in him as in individuals of inferior races.” The speaker concluded by saying that, in his opinion, science would develop from the defamed hypnotism and somnambulism into an expanded and refined psychology, which would mean as much to us for the knowledge of the soul as astronomy and chemistry mean for the knowledge of nature, despite the fact that these sciences have developed from astrology and alchemy.

In the discussion that followed, Nicolai was the first to criticize the fact that it was not explained what Theosophy actually wanted and could do.

Dr. Steiner replied that his lecture had only wanted to emphasize the connection between monism and the world view, which was already moving in modern tracks in the days of Vedanta philosophy in India. The dualism that has been emerging in Christianity since the 4th century consists in the fact that it may well accept the eye and the senses for the knowledge of the world of phenomena, but for the knowledge of our origin and our destination, it does not allow the means of our knowledge either, but refers us to faith, to the revelations of old books and prophets. But monism promises a development of knowledge, just as it has been able to establish a development of species for living beings. In the writings of Vedanta philosophy, there is a conversation in which a disciple asks the teacher: What happens when I die? The teacher replies: The solid and liquid parts of your body will become solid and liquid again, because man is like a stone and an animal; even the expressions of your thoughts and actions dissolve into your surroundings, but what remains is the “development,” the reason for what has formed your personality. — Thus, Vedanta philosophy is already monistic in its core. What lives only in the unconscious in animals, namely the urge to develop their personality, must enter into fullest consciousness in humans and merge with consciousness as an ideal.

Fritz Sänger polemicized against Dr. Steiner. The Theosophists always pretend that they already possessed and still possess the results of modern natural science, but they have never given any examples of such superiority. He feared that a movement of this kind was only too well suited to undermine the results of modern natural science; despite the most careful observation, he had only been able to find the expression of idiocy in spiritualism, but he had to acknowledge the fact of hypnotism.

After Köhn had spoken in warm and urgent words in favor of Dr. Steiner, O. Lehmann-Rußbüldt remarked that Mr. Sänger's remarks were typical of the representatives of so-called natural science of all times. Fifteen years ago, Sänger would have declared as nonsense the fact, demonstrated by Krafft-Ebing among others, that a lime-leaf laid on a hypnotized person causes a burn like a glowing piece of iron if the hypnotized person is to regard it as such; just as a hundred years ago the French materialists declared it to be nonsense that meteorites can fall from space onto the earth.

Dr. Steiner then once again vigorously opposed the confusion of Theosophy and spiritualism. If Mr. Sänger had encountered such Theosophists who gave cause for this, then he should stick to them, but he, Dr. Steiner, firmly rejected this. He considers it immoral in the philosophical sense to seek teachings about destiny and human nature through the manifestations of so-called spirits; that would be gross materialism. He also does not place any particular value on the name Theosophy. Above all, he finds the high ethics of Theosophy meaningful in his sense, which, for example, leads to the most serious consequences in education. What a perspective for the mind of the educator when he is aware that he has to unfold a seed of divinity in the child! ^{1Our reporter, Mr. Otto Lehmann-Rußbüldt, the second chairman of the Bruno-Bund, feels the need to add to the report here that he also sees this lecture, alongside so many other significant phenomena in the spiritual life, as a nucleus of a new, noble culture. “Times of great upheaval do not come upon us like a mystical something; if we create them, they are there.” I would welcome the ‘Cheosophical’ movement with a program as formulated by Dr. Steiner. Let us hope that the newly emerging life forces of rejuvenation can create, above all, more lively, poetically inspiring words; what use are all the ‘isms’ to us! In any case, the golden wheat of genuine theosophy has unfortunately been buried under so much chaff of parroting Indian vocabulary that the philosophical hero who can collect it in a new sheaf, that is, under a new name, is highly welcome.}

Report by Richard Bresch, “Der Vâhan,” Volume IV, Nos. 5 and 6, November and December 1902.

After preliminary discussions had already taken place between individual delegates on the evening of October 18, the negotiations began at half past twelve on schedule in the hall of the Theosophical Library and former apartment of Count Brockdorff, who had moved to Meran, [Berlin] Charlottenburg, KaiserFriedrich-Str. 54a. They were introduced by an appropriate address by the chairman, Dr. Steiner. Those who understand the signs of the times cannot fail to see that we are on the threshold of a new intellectual epoch, that a new turning point is in preparation, one that is just as important and significant as those in the times of Augustine or in the 16th century, a change in which Germany in particular is destined to play a very great role; German science has the most important task in the face of materialism, and only hand in hand with it will we be able to work...

The ten lodges included in the section charter were represented as follows:

They initially agreed that, in accordance with the statutes of the European section, the Berlin lodge, with more than 25 members, should have three votes in voting, but all other lodges should only have two votes. It is not the place here to go into detail on the individual paragraphs of the new statutes, since the latter are expected to be published separately soon. It should only be noted here that, in order to ensure that as many lodges as possible are represented on the board, it was decided to elect ten additional members to the board, in addition to the four members living in or near Berlin, in accordance with the statutes of the European section, for a total of fourteen members. Dr. Steiner was elected as Secretary General, Mrs. von Holten as Treasurer, Julius Engel, Miss von Sivers and Mr. Rüdiger (Charlottenburg) as residents of Berlin and its surrounding areas, and in addition Dr. Hübbe-Schleiden, Ludwig Deinhard, Günther Wagner, Bernhard Hubo, Adolf Kolbe (Hamburg), Bruno Berg, Dr. Noll (Kassel), Oppel (Stuttgart), Richard Bresch were elected. All were elected for three years. The accounting year ends on September 30, and it was decided not to request a refund of any dues already paid to London for the current year, so that for the accounting year that has already begun, the dues set at three marks for each member are now to be collected from the branches and delivered to the new treasurer. The general assembly, which apart from extraordinary ones should take place annually, is to meet on October 19. In addition to the lodge delegates, only the general secretary and treasurer have voting rights at the assembly. The journal Dr. Steiner intends to publish under the name Lucifer, the first issue of which will appear around January 1903, is intended to reveal and collect all the threads and guidelines that lead from nature, art, philosophy, science and social life to the spiritual, thus leading to theosophy. This undertaking was welcomed by all as a thoroughly purposeful, equally arduous and meritorious one; a separate section organ should not exist, but the “Vâhan” should also publish the section news.

Written congratulations were received from the Italian section, a telegraphic message from the French section, and verbal congratulations were offered by the Scandinavian section, through a gentleman present from Denmark, and by the British section, through Mrs. Besant. In addition, several telegrams of congratulations were received from individual members.

The negotiations lasted until the next day, because Mrs. Besant's arrival at seven o'clock at the Friedrichstraße station was expected. She had come to Berlin from London especially for this occasion, thereby demonstrating the great importance she and the British Section attach to the formation of the German Section. Her presence during these days in Berlin has significantly increased their importance and we German Theosophists are grateful to her. The train pulled into the station right on time and was greeted by a short but warm welcome from about 25 members.

The next day, Dr. Steiner welcomed Mrs. Besant as she entered the hall during the proceedings and she was given a standing ovation; she attended the proceedings for about half an hour. After the latter had been brought to a satisfactory conclusion thanks to Dr. Steiner's skillful and tactful leadership, she presented the charter of the German Section to him as the General Secretary and, after a break during which the kind and generous hospitality of Fräulein von Sivers also took care of the physical needs of the participants, she gave a speech in front of 50 to 60 people. She explained how the European (now British again) section had previously included the lodges of all European nations, but how cumbersome and complicated its administration had been as a result, a situation that could only be provisional, of course, until one by one the national sections stand on their own two feet and break away from the parent section; this is how the Scandinavian, Dutch, French and Italian sections came into being, and it is a source of particular satisfaction to her that the German Theosophical work is now also being tackled by Germans in the German way. All nations are different and each nation practices Theosophy in its own way, but the nations are like the notes of a harmony, each contributing its part to the great harmony, their combination forming the harmony, realizing the universal brotherhood, so the German Theosophical work is also a necessary part of the global Theosophical movement. The theosophical movement needs the German spirit, needs the cooperation of the German people, in order to be enriched by it. Ms. Besant then explained the difference between the Theosophical Society and other societies (see February “Vâhan”, p. 129), and that the current merger of lodges into a section is comparable to the formation of a vessel made of clay, thus creating a reservoir for divine life from which the latter can flow over humanity. Compared to the religious foundations of earlier times, each with a great teacher who transmitted this divine life, the Theosophical Society represents a significant step forward. It is not a new religion, but strives for the great unity of all religions. However, as the divine life flows into the reservoir and the privilege is received, the responsibility for the members also increases, and harmonious cooperation is an indispensable requirement. If in everyday life, every gain and progress is sought only for one's own personal advantage, then this must now change. It is necessary to purify oneself and to let go of all personal desires and dislikes. Only then does one become a Theosophist, rather than just a member of society. But by considering that although there is one life in all, it manifests itself differently in each, and each person sees the truth only from a different point of view, in a different way. One person may have poetic gifts, another organizational abilities, a third intellectual, oratory or literary talents. The secret of success lies in the cooperation of all, in mutual tolerance, appreciation and support.

Dr. Steiner's lecture on practical karma studies formed the conclusion of the evening, but we must refrain from going into this here.

Many members enjoyed the stimulating company at the vegetarian restaurant opposite the Central Hotel until late in the evening.

On Tuesday, October 21, between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m., Mrs. von Holten invited members to her hospitable, elegant home, and the time flew by in lively conversation when the time came to leave for Charlottenburg via the new elevated railway or underground railway, where, in the already used rooms, Mrs. Besant answered a wide range of questions in front of around 50 members:

Regarding Christian Science, she said that a distinction is made between Christian and mental healers. The former deny all illness, saying that only God possesses reality and everything else is unreal, an illusion. The latter, however, recognize the illness and thus take a more rational approach. They seek to restore harmony (health) by using the right will and thinking to counteract the disharmony caused by wrong thinking. However, there is a danger with all such healings that, although the evil is removed from the lower level, it is instead drawn up into higher ones, from where it would then have to descend again in a different, worse form; physical ailments should therefore only be treated with physical means. Healing through prayer, etc., should actually only be done by those who have vision. They see what is missing and observe the effect of their actions. When the saints perform healings, they act from the vision that the karma of the sick person has taken effect, and they then restore the desired harmony by means of their own life energies.

Furthermore, the question was asked: How does Jesus eating fish with his disciples square with the commandment of pure food? According to the Holy Scripture, Jesus also ate fish after appearing to his disciples. Is the astral body even capable of ingesting food? Answer: The latter suggests that the passage is to be understood symbolically. For the Christian as well as for the sacred scriptures of the East, three interpretations are possible at the same time. The first is that one is dealing with historical or factual information intended to teach morals and ethics to the masses of people; the second is for the more developed, the intellectual, and the third is the deepest, mystical. The more developed person, like the present questioner, finds an inner contradiction in the sayings, which urges him to seek a higher explanation; in the occult sense, fish signify esotericism; so if Jesus ate fish with his disciples, it means that he instructed them in secret knowledge. Incidentally, however, the saint could also enjoy impure food without harm, since he knew how to render the harmful juices harmless or to excrete them, as the legend of St. Sankharacharya proves, to whom one of his disciples had reproached him for eating impure food. The next day they came to a blacksmith's shop, where the teacher took a glowing piece of iron and wanted to give it to the disciple. But when the disciple recoiled, he was taught that he, the teacher, could also enjoy impure food 'without harm, but the disciple could not. - In response to the question, “What karma does one incur who neglects his family in favor of his theosophical work?” The answer was that everyone has to do their duty where their karma has placed them, so that everyone has to take care of their family first and foremost.

Question: Did the martyrs incur their terrible suffering in a past life or not?

Answer: The martyrs usually take on such suffering of their own free will for the good of humanity, thereby benefiting from an opportunity for faster progress that presents itself to them, or creating good karma for the future.

Question: Lazarus is said to have been resurrected four days after Christ's death. Shouldn't the body have begun to decompose after four days, and is resurrection still possible?

Answer: First of all, we have no proof that it would really have happened that way. If decomposition had already occurred, revival to physical life would no longer be possible. The magnetic connection between the astral and physical bodies must still be present, otherwise it would be impossible even for a saint to call someone back to life. However, this connection could still be present weeks after the apparent death.

Question: If this connection can exist for such a long time, can it not often happen that people are buried alive?

Answer: We want to hope and wish that this does not happen so often, but the possibility should not be ruled out. Indeed, changes in the position of the corpses have been observed in graves, and cases of reawakening have been proven. In any case, the short time period prescribed in France before burial is not to be approved.

Question: Is it right to be cremated after death?

Answer: She (Besant) has always held the view that the best form of burial is cremation because it is the quickest and most thorough way to sever any connection with the physical world. Another question concerned the spiritual tidal wave that descends from higher planes every century, which retreats from the physical plane at the end of the century. Mrs. Besant confirmed this information, but the retreat of the tidal wave is no reason to stop the theosophical work afterwards, otherwise the next spiritual tidal wave would have to start all the more deeply.

A question regarding mantras was answered as follows: even the ignorant person who recites a mantra achieves some effect, however small. However, they are far more effective when they are recited competently with conscious will and knowledge. - Mention was also made of the recent claim by a London sectarian clergyman to be the incarnate Jesus, who should be treated with caution; but the fact that Jesus, as he once did to his disciples, can still show himself in the astral to a circle of his followers today, at least the possibility cannot be denied, only the utmost purity of the aspirations of such followers would be an indispensable prerequisite.

Finally, Mrs. Besant also refuted the oft-repeated accusation against the law of karma that it prevents all charity and compassion. Anyone who, on the pretext that suffering is the karma of the person in need of help, fails to take advantage of an opportunity to help a person in need, does not consider that he was chosen by karma as the instrument to provide relief in the emergency. If he fails to do so, he too will be left in the lurch when he encounters a similar emergency. The law of karma, however, will then seek and find another agent to fulfill its purpose, which cannot remain unfulfilled or be broken.

In the evening, Mrs. Besant finally gave the public lecture at the Hotel Prinz Albrecht, which was attended by about 400 people. It was introduced by an address by Dr. Steiner: Many would have been surprised, he said, when he publicly confessed to Theosophy in the Giordano Bruno Federation about 14 days ago. But just as Giordano Bruno, relying on Kepler's discoveries, demanded the recognition of a new worldview, so today Theosophy brings a new worldview and we stand today, just as we did then, at a world-historical turning point. Today, the German Section has been founded and for this reason the most outstanding representative in the Theosophical movement has come here to speak the first words publicly. Mrs. Besant's lecture on Theosophy, its meaning and purpose, was as follows:

In the last 100 years, Mrs. Besant began her public lecture on Theosophy, the world has become smaller for us, because we can see it more easily and more completely, but on the other hand it also seems larger to us when we consider what research has painstakingly brought to light. Countries and peoples have grown closer; we cross the oceans with ease in all directions; what used to take years now takes weeks or months, what used to take days now takes minutes or hours. But not only spatial distances are shrinking, but also temporal ones. While 100 years ago, only a few thousand years of human history could be looked back on, today we are able to look further and further back. The old buildings and other remains of long-gone civilizations are coming to light, lost nations and dead languages are being awakened, so that they come to new life and activity before our eyes. We see them before us in their customs and habits, and written records even tell us about their religious beliefs. Comparing the otherwise so different traditions of the most diverse peoples, we were astonished to find that all the religions of the extinct peoples agreed on the main points, and that they must therefore have a common root. From the bosom of the earth, from graves and ancient ruins, writings are emerging that confirm this. In Mexico, ancient monuments bear witness to a long-vanished civilization that had amazed the first Spanish settlers to arrive there. Around the Mediterranean basin, in Central Asia, Macedonia, among the ancient Etruscans, etc., writings were found in graves that revealed the same thoughts about nature, the human spirit, and its eternal duration . Even among the Chaldeans, Persians and other nations, comparative mythology has found the same terms for certain principles. Nowhere did it find a religious doctrine that was completely different from the others, but everywhere the same doctrines, the same ethics, the same symbols; so the question arose as to the root cause of this striking similarity. Many researchers have indeed tried to explain this similarity by saying that the religions and the first crude concepts of God among savages arose out of fear of the forces of nature and of death, and thus arose everywhere from the same motives and gradually developed and refined with increasing intelligence and culture. The most important thinkers outside the church were those who held this view, among them in particular Huxley. They called it agnosticism, that is, the opinion that we humans cannot know anything about religion and transcendental things and that in this regard everything is merely a matter of faith and feeling. But experience does not agree with this view, for instead of gradually developing and perfecting religions, we find that there are always highly perfect, pure, highly spiritual religions founded from the outset, which only degenerate and materialize over time – in other words, precisely the opposite process. From the ancient scriptures, especially those of the Indians, it can be seen that the concepts of God, the afterlife, eternal justice, etc., become ever more refined and elevated the further back in time we reach, instead of becoming coarser and cruder.¹

In the [Upanishads], for example, which are thought to have been written around 5000 BC, we find the most exalted concepts of God and the human spirit, which even our greatest philosophers lag behind, as Schopenhauer, for example, acknowledged when he said that the [Upanishads] had enlightened his mind and would be his comfort in death. Since religions have not developed from savagery and ignorance, but rather, as far back as history goes, were founded by sages such as Laotse, Zoroaster, Moses, Krishna, Buddha, Jesus, and Mohammed, Theosophy answers the question about the reason for the agreement shown by all religions, even those of the distant past, : There is a brotherhood of divine men who have risen far above the development of ordinary men; this brotherhood sends from time to time a brother, who, be it as a king or as a leader and teacher, protects, supervises, teaches and educates a particular people or a particular race. All these masters have proclaimed the same truths to the world, and history teaches that each new religion is followed by a new era of development. All the main ideas of the old religions reappear in the modern religions. The idea of the further development of one and the same human entity over many lives (reincarnation) was also found among the Hebrews and in early Christianity; later, in the sixth century AD, however, it was declared heresy and only survived in a few sects. But religion does not necessarily have to be based on such a divine teacher, that is, on belief in an authority; it can also be a form of knowledge, a realization. Man is able to separate himself from his bodies and enter the higher planes of consciousness. This has long been scientifically proven. Christianity, Islam, and many mystics up to the present day testify to this possibility. We see evidence e in somnambulism, telepathy, suggestion, hypnotism, in all kinds of clairvoyance [and so on], so that even the most stubborn skeptics can no longer close their minds to these facts. Of course, they try to discredit such manifestations by saying that they only occur in cases of hysteria, nervous disorders, and thus in a pathological state.² occurred.

Well, I am not saying that it is so, but even if it were the case that only people with extremely fine nerves could leave their bodies, this would not be a testimony against the existence of this fact. Lombroso, an Italian psychiatrist, says that genius and madness live very close to each other. Even if he is right, it is still fortunate for humanity that there are such geniuses who make us happy through their creations. Or do you think that the beef-eating, beer-drinking, muscle-bound average man would be more likely to produce such works of art? Consider our great geniuses, a genius like Beethoven, a sculptor like Michelangelo, a Goethe, a Shakespeare! Where did they get their great ideas? Did they not get them by seeing them in spirit at a higher level? How many messages have been given to us by people who have seen and heard things in a trance or in ecstasy! In this state, the spiritual person leaves his body, slips out of his shell, as it were, and can then rise to a higher level than the physical one, where he sees and has clairvoyance. This ability can also be acquired through practice and a certain training; that which sees or recognizes there is our spiritual essence and since this is an outflow of the one great life that lives in all, it can also not only recognize this unity in all, consider it true in theory, but when man is first can take his consciousness uninterruptedly over into his temporal day-consciousness, he sees, knows and feels this unity, the one life that pulsates in all, and understands his brother, because he feels with him, thinks with him and loves him, not as another, but as a part of his own self. Because he now understands everyone, he also embraces everyone with the same love. We should all learn this knowledge. Theosophy gives us the opportunity to do so; it offers us its treasures.

Once we all have this level of knowledge and understanding, then everyone will also respect the differences of others. Hatred and antagonism, however, as they still prevail today between nations - the Frenchman hates the Englishman, the Englishman the German, the German the Frenchman and so on - are based on the fact that each nation regards its relationship with every other nation through the prism of its self-created thought and feeling, and in the light of eternal reality, all these antagonisms between nations, like individuals, are foolishness and folly; there should only be one competition between them, namely, which nation will earn the greatest merit for the good of the whole. The time will come when everyone recognizes the tone and color that is expressed in every nation and every individual, when everyone grasps the harmony that flows from these tones and colors, rejoices in them, finds in them a complement to own tone and color; this harmony of tones and colors will lead us to that eternal blessed peace, as it will arise from the divine wisdom, theosophy, in the future.

So much for Mrs. Besant's public lecture, which visibly made a deep and lasting impression on the audience, even those who understood little English; there was nothing sensational, theatrical, nothing screaming, intrusive; in short, powerful, powerfully emphasized sentences gave even the non-understanding the impression of the dignified, the momentous. Mrs. Besant spoke with perfect rhetoric, despite the severe fever that she had recently overcome, without a trace of fatigue, without faltering even once, without once correcting a word or changing a phrase she had begun, and the last sentence of her speech came across as freshly as the first. Dr. Steiner took it upon himself to interpret the main ideas of this lecture for the non-English-speaking audience, not literally, but in his own way. However, a reproduction of his remarks would have to repeat too much of the above, which is why it must be omitted here.

So in those memorable days in Berlin, we finally found the long-awaited union, so that the next day I felt solemn and could easily have been persuaded that Berlin had put up the festive flags not for the Empress, but for our Section. After all, the stagnation and faltering of the Theosophical movement in Germany, the splintering into illegitimate offshoots, has now been prevented as far as possible, and we have created a viable organizational basis for fruitful growth, planted a healthy seed in fertile soil. The real work, however, the growth itself, is only just beginning, even if we have all the necessary virtues and abilities among us.

• 1. This is confirmed, among others, by Max Müller in his Essays on the Science of Religion (p. 40ff.), where he says: “Monotheism preceded polytheism, and through the polytheistic fog in the Vedas, the memory of the One Infinite God breaks through.” Furthermore, von Spiegel, one of the first experts on Persian religion, when he expresses himself in his “Eranische Altertumskunde”, vol. II, preface, about the former as follows: “Contrary to my earlier view, I now no longer believe that the Eranian religion emerged from polytheism in such a way that the multiplicity of the Göuer was reduced to a duality and finally arrived at monotheism. It seems more correct to me that a vigorous monotheism preceded dualism.” And the ‘Germania’ of Nov. 5th. also says in an article ‘Original Polytheism’: ”The original religion, it may once have existed, but it must have left some traces, some afterglow, in the oldest religions. These traces must be followed up if one wants to research the developmental history of religion. What do the oldest religions of the Chinese, Egyptians, and Indo-Europeans teach in their written monuments about an original polytheism? Not the slightest thing. On the contrary. The further research advances into the distant past, the more it is able, through the most diverse discoveries, to examine the earliest germs of religion, the more the picture of a primeval humanity that pays homage to the most desolate fetishism and most excessive polytheism proves to be a magnificent humbug.... History has advanced to the most distant times. It knows of peoples who, from the most ancient times to the present, have worshiped many gods in all parts of the world. In these long centuries, it should be possible to find some evidence of a transformation from polytheism to monotheism, even if it is only a very weak beginning. Why are no such facts taught? Quite simply because there are none.
• 2. However, today's doctors are very good at distinguishing between epilepsy and ecstasy; this is shown in a posthumous work by Prof. Kußmaul that appeared in the “Deutsche Revue”. The claim that many of the greatest men in world history, such as the apostle Paul, suffered from epilepsy, is refuted here. In the case of Mohammed, it seems that he suffered from a non-epileptic, catatonic nervous condition. He dictated the suras of the Koran during his seizures, which is not consistent with the nature of epileptic seizures. Kußmaul demands that scientific pathology must place strict demands on the diagnosis of epilepsy. D.R.

Translated by Marie Steiner for the twenty-seventh Anniversary and Convention of the Theosophical Society

To the President-Founder, TS: received with much pleasure the Charter of 22nd July, 1902, and made all necessary preparations for the formation of the German Section of the TS. At the general meeting of the 19th and 20th of October this Section was formally constituted, and the Executive Committee chosen. The ten lodges forming our section are: Berlin, Charlottenburg, Düsseldorf, Hamburg, Stuttgart, Hannover, Lugano (Switzerland), Munich, Cassel and Leipzig.

The names of the Executive Committee are:

Dr. Rudolf Steiner, General Secretary (ex-officio), and the Mesdames and Messrs. Henriette von Holten, Julius Engel, Bernard Hubo, Richard Bresch, Dr. HübbeSchleiden, Günther Wagner, Ludwig Deinhard, Bruno Berg, Adolf Kolbe, Gustav Rüdiger, Adolf Oppel, Marie von Sivers and Dr. Noll.

The President of the Leipzig Lodge is issuing the Vâhan. A review, which is to be edited by Dr. Rudolf Steiner under the name of Luzifer, is to appear either on the Ist January or the 1st April.

The books printed in the course of last year were: «The Mystic in the awakening of spiritual life in the new times,» Dr. Rudolf Steiner; «Christianity as a mystical fact,» Dr. Rudolf Steiner; «Goethe’s Faust: a picture of his Esoteric Philosophy,» Dr. Rudolf Steiner; «Occult Psychology,» by Ludwig Deinhard; «Is Death an End?» by B. Hubo, and translations of «Thought Power» and «Evolution of Life and Form,» by Mrs. Besant, and «Fragments of a Faith Forgotten,» by G.R.S. Mead.

Our task for the coming year will be the recruiting of members and an increased activity by writings and lectures in the service of Theosophy, as well as an attempt to introduce Theosophy into the various branches of German spiritual life.

The German Section began its activity with the visit of Mrs. Besant, who gave on 20th October a lecture to the members of the T.S., and on the 21st, another to a large public gathering, upon «Theosophy, its meaning and objects.»

The Rules of the German Section were discussed in the General Meeting and adopted.

The head-quarters of the German Section is in Berlin.

Accept my assurance that I shall work in the service of the Theosophical Society in every way to the utmost of my strength.

Rudolf Steiner,
General Secretary.

On February 11, 1903, Mathilde Scholl had written to Rudolf Steiner:

...In connection with our conversation, I would now like to ask the following. On plate XXVI of Leadbeater's book [“Man visible & invisible”] is the aura of one of Buddha's disciples, a disciple who has reached the fourth stage on the path, the stage of an arhat. The aura is concentrically arranged, the color sequence from the center:

1) yellow = intelligence
2) pink = love
3) light blue = devotion
4) green = compassion (sympathy)
5) violet = spirituality

all this surrounded by a rainbow-colored or rather mother-of-pearl-colored halo and permeated by living rays of light emanating from the body of the Arhat. - Leadbeater says that the order of the colors can be used to identify the type of Arhat or Master.

To which species or hierarchy could a being belong whose aura, starting from the center, first shows 1) light blue = devotion and then 2) pink = love. The arrangement is also concentric, just like the aura shown - but no colors other than light blue and pink were visible. [In a dream experience.] However, the physical body appeared only in outline and transparent, not three-dimensional, and in it appeared centers (like the swastika or like wheels) that turned in the fastest motion around themselves and emitted light. The face had the features and expression of Master M.

If you can or may tell me who this being is or how I can find an explanation myself, I would be happy.

Should a merger of the E.S. in Germany be possible at a later date, I would be delighted. Some external things are still of help to me. For example, I would love to have proper instructions for my studies. At the beginning, that is, two and a half years ago, the instruction was given as to which verses I should memorize each evening. But since no further instructions were given, I went through the Bhagavad Gita in this way and then the “Voice of Silence,” which I have now reached at the end of the second book. It would be a help for me not to study without guidance and to know, for example, in the morning during meditation that many are focusing their thoughts on the same thing as me – to know that others are studying the same book as me, and many other things.

Rudolf Steiner replied as follows:

Dearest Miss Scholl!

I should have written to you long ago. However, my obligations regarding “Lucifer” ¹ had a somewhat oppressive effect on everything else. Now it will finally come out in a few days; and then I will hopefully also get down to quite regular work. In any case, I will not wait so long to answer in the future as has unfortunately been the case up to now.

First, let me address your main question. The aura you describe is not clear enough for me to be able to say anything substantial about it. You say nothing about rays emanating from the being described. Now, in a more advanced human being, rays are always present in the causal body. These rays are namely the expression of the active forces that the person inflicts on his advancing karma. It seems that what you describe is not a causal body image. However, I do not want to say that we are not dealing with a highly developed being in your case. But then it could only be the projection of the causal body in mental matter. And in this case, I do not understand the swastikas, which again point to an astral element. I therefore request that you write to me with more details about this matter. I would like us to be clear about this.²

It would be quite nice if the newer members of the E.S. in Germany would in some way join together more closely. We need this in Germany in particular. For the E.S. must become the soul of the Theosophical Society. In Germany it must do so even more so because for a long time to come we can only hope for deeper, inner cooperation among individuals, and larger circles will only join externally. But the individuals will form a more loyal, secure and powerful base. And we need that, because we have come so far astray.

In Weimar, everything went quite well. We now also have a lodge there. The lectures were extremely well attended. I would like to come to Cologne for a variety of reasons, to give a lecture there as well. Please, maybe you can prepare the ground there a little. Much, very much depends on us creating new centers. Up to now almost all German Theosophists have sought a connection with the English mother movement that was much too loose. And only from this, in the most intimate connection with it, must we now work. There was too much of a tendency towards dogmatics in Germany, towards the mere intellectual grasp of doctrines, while there is no real understanding of living spirituality. Only when we awaken this latter, when we open our eyes to the fact that for the progress of the theosophical current it is not enough to learn the dogmas (Hartmann), but to belong spiritually to the central individualities from whom wisdom originates and in whom it has its continuous source: - only then can we move forward. We must make it clear, not through words but through imponderables, that it is a matter of the continuous fertilization of the bearers of the T.S. by central individualities. Only those who work esoterically will fully understand all these things; but for that, they must also stand together in a clearly conscious and forceful way, awakening the others.

It was deeply satisfying for me to be able to spend a few hours with you in Düsseldorf. It is the kind of satisfaction we feel when we see others on the road where the mile markers always point forward. For the Theosophist, there is only one gate through which one should pass only once, and which one should not enter a second time, to go back.

In Germany, we have only four or five very secure personalities. And that is why we have to work intensively. If we do that, we will find the ways and means to move forward. If we do not find these ways and means in Germany, then we would be neglecting something now that cannot be remedied so quickly.

My next exoteric task is to spread the teaching as much as I can. I hope, my dearest and most esteemed Miss Scholl, that you are settling in well in Cologne and are able to work there for our cause and to your satisfaction. How are the people in your care?

Hoping to hear from you soon, I remain sincerely yours

Rudolf Steiner

• 1. The journal founded and edited by R. Steiner. See GA 34.
• 2. In response, Mathilde Scholl wrote the following on May 7, 1903: “...Thank you very much for answering my question. The vision I described to you did indeed radiate light, and this light seemed to bubble up from the swastikas located on the head and upper body. In fact, only the head and upper body were visible, and only in outline. The being did not appear corporeal, but seemed to be only a luminous apparition. But the impression was so strong that I believed in the dream that I threw myself at the feet of this being and lost consciousness. Upon awakening, everything was vividly before my eyes and I felt the inner emotion for a long time afterwards. At first I did not look for an explanation at all. It was only through Leadbeater's book that I understood how it is possible to see such an arrangement of colors. But I would like to know who this being was, because even if it seemed to have the features of Master M., it may just as well have been based on my individual mood as on reality.” [The answer to this question is not known.]

Theorem: Light seen through dark, appears yellow. Dark seen through light, appears blue. At the boundary between light and dark, colors appear.

1. If you look at a black circle on a white field through a convex-cut glass, the circle enlarges, and around it you see a yellow border.

Also when the dark spreads into the light, yellow appears.

2. If you magnify a white circle on a dark field through a convex ground glass, you see a blue edge (Figure 2)

3. If you look at a white circle on a black field through a concave-cut glass, you see a reduced circle surrounded by a yellow rim.

4. If you look at a black circle on a white background through a concave cut glass, you see it surrounded by a blue border, because as the white spreads into the dark, blue appears.

White and black are the two poles of light. Yellow and blue are the two poles of color. Green is the mixture of yellow and blue. (Gray is the mixture of white and black.) All other colors are shades.

Color is created by light and dark interacting at their boundaries without mixing. When they mix, white-gray or a hazy color is created.

If one looks at a black circle through a prism, the shape elongates and becomes an ellipse. Two edges are formed, one yellow and one blue; where it is narrow, the yellow edge is formed, where it is wide, the blue edge. In the other case the analogous event happens.

A white stripe, viewed through the prism, is shifted so that on one side light is passed over dark, on the other dark is passed over light; thus in the first case a blue edge stripe is formed, in the second a yellow one is formed.

If I take a wider prism, a red stripe joins the yellow one, and a violet one joins the blue one on the outside.

If the prism is still wider, orange still emerges in between on one side and indigo on the other.

If the prism is of a width such that the two poles of color mix, the result is green.

All colors seen in such a way through a prism are subjective.

Now let's move on to objective colors—in a darkroom.

By letting the rays of light pass through a prism, we deflect the white circle formed on the screen, draw it out, and it acquires colored edges.

What was seen subjectively earlier emerges precisely in objective colors on the screen.

When the Sun's rays are refracted by a prism and caught on an opposite wall, the circle of the Sun's disk is stretched in length, yielding at its edges all the colors of the solar spectrum from red to violet. This spectrum exerts a threefold effect: as heat, light and chemical effect. And it does so in such a way that red emits the most heat, which gradually decreases towards yellow. In the middle between yellow and green is the light band (the part with the strongest light effect). The blue shades, with purple being the strongest, produce chemical effects.

If rays pass through a glass sphere containing an alum solution, the spot of light obtained at the other end will probably shine, but will not give off heat, because the alum solution has absorbed it and let the light through.

Iodine dissolved in carbon disulfide would make the light spot appear as a dark spot, but one that contains heat and can ignite substances. Thus, this solution would have retained the light and given off the heat. This proves that matter is an entity endowed with determinate properties and freely attracts and repels.

A prism with rock salt solution or made of rock salt would show that the strongest heat emission still goes beyond the red, thus providing evidence that there are still other rays that we cannot perceive with our eyes. These invisible warmth rays are the infrared ones. Beyond the purple, the chemical effects still reveal invisible ultraviolet rays.

So a spectrum would be composed of these three different fields of forces. From one side, the warmth line, which decreases toward the center; and from there, the rise of the chemical force line, which is strongest in the ultraviolet. Into the center of both projects the line of light.

The eye perceives colors because it is constructed to produce colors. If the eye perceives a red object on a white background and now looks away, the same object will appear as the illusion of green on a white background. The eye that has seen red demands green. Yellow demands indigo, yellow-green demands violet. These colors that demand to be complemented are called complementary colors. They are colors that together make white—they demand each other.

An eye that cannot produce blue colors would see the forest as yellow, and violet would appear red to it.

Every color demands its counterpart, and complementary colors exert an aesthetic effect.