Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

Search results 1251 through 1260 of 1667

˂ 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 ... 167 ˃
73. Anthoposophy Has Something to Add to Modern Science: Can a method of gaining insight into spheres beyond the sense-perceptible world be given a scientific basis? 08 Oct 1918, Zürich
Tr. Anna R. Meuss

Rudolf Steiner
I would therefore like to begin this course of lectures by attempting to present the scientific foundations—at least in general terms—for the higher insights sought in this anthroposophy. I am afraid I have to ask your forgiveness especially for today’s lecture which will of necessity be less popular than the three that are to follow.
Misunderstanding arises above all because investigators and thinkers committed to natural science, and people who imagine they are creating a philosophy based on natural science for themselves in a popular way, tend to think that anthroposophy is in opposition to natural science. I will try and show that the science of the spirit which is meant here is not only not in opposition to natural science but rather pursues the aims of natural science itself, right to its ultimate consequences, taking the spirit of the method of proving things that is used in natural science further than people do in natural science itself.
173c. The Karma of Untruthfulness II: Lecture XXV 30 Jan 1917, Dornach
Tr. Johanna Collis

Rudolf Steiner
Supposing we were to approach those who have undergone a scientific education, with the intention of introducing them to Anthroposophy: lawyers, doctors, philologists—not to mention theologians—when they have finished their academic education and reached a certain stage in life at which it is necessary for them, in accordance with life's demands, to make use of what they have absorbed, not to say, have learnt.
That is why scientifically-educated people are the most inclined to reject Anthroposophy, although it would only be a small step for a modern scientist to build a bridge. But he does not want to do so.
306. The Child's Changing Consciousness and Waldorf Education: Lecture IV 18 Apr 1923, Dornach
Tr. Roland Everett

Rudolf Steiner
Thus we neither wish nor intend to teach our students to become anthroposophists. We have chosen anthroposophy to be the foundation simply because we believe that a true method of teaching can flow from it.
Nevertheless, anthroposophical methods have proven to be very fertile ground for just these free religion lessons, in which we do not teach anthroposophy, but in which we build up and form according to the methods already characterized. Many objections have been raised against these free religion lessons, not least because so many children have changed over from the denominational to the free religion lessons.
336. The Big Questions of our Time and Anthroposophical Spiritual Knowledge: The Great Questions of the Time and the Anthroposophical Knowledge of the Spirit 18 Nov 1920, Freiburg

Rudolf Steiner
It was founded not so much in order that the spirit of some abstract worldview might bring a new religious belief into this school, so that children might be educated in anthroposophy, as it were. Not at all. But something else is the case. Those who take up anthroposophy as a living reality in their soul life develop from it the practical tools of education and teaching; they develop a pedagogical art that is no longer connected with what led us into the catastrophe, but with what is longed for as the spirit of the future.
336. The Big Questions of our Time and Anthroposophical Spiritual Knowledge: Independent Spiritual Life in the Threefold Social Organism 27 Jun 1921, Dornach

Rudolf Steiner
But this Waldorf School was not misused to instill dogmatic anthroposophy into children in a school of world view. The founding of the Waldorf School was quite the opposite of this.
And therefore, no matter how much individual members of the youth movement may say, “We do not want the abstract, we want the emotional,” they will still have to realize: What spiritual science in anthroposophy wants to be is precisely not something abstract, it is the full human being, it is what comes out of the whole human being, it is what expresses itself as art and as religion and as science, and it is the point at which the whole, full human being can come to his inner realization.
68d. The Nature of Man in the Light of Spiritual Science: The Mystery of the Human Temperaments 19 Jan 1909, Karlsruhe
Tr. Frances E. Dawson

Rudolf Steiner
Spiritual science, or as we call it more recently, Anthroposophy, will have a special task precisely regarding this individual enigma—man. Not only must it give us information about what man is in general, but it must be, as you know, a knowledge which flows directly into our daily life, into all our sensibilities and feelings.
When in life a person stands before us, we must always, in the sense of this spiritual science, or Anthroposophy, take into consideration that what we perceive outwardly of the person is only one part, only one member, of the human being.
Thus by means of such true life wisdom we create social foundations, and that means at each moment to solve a riddle. Anthroposophy works not by means of preaching, exhortation, harping on morals, but by creating a social basis on which one man is able to understand another.
283. The Inner Nature of Music and the Experience of Tone: Lecture V 30 Sep 1920, Dornach
Tr. Maria St. Goar

Rudolf Steiner
One naturally gets into the habit of speaking in general concepts even in anthroposophy. One thus says that man consists of physical body, etheric body, astral body, and “I.” One has to put it like that to begin with in order to describe the human being in stages, but actually the matter is more complicated than one thinks.
346. Lectures to Priests The Apocalypse: Lecture XIII 17 Sep 1924, Dornach
Tr. Unknown

Rudolf Steiner
When I tried to interpret the Apocalypse in Nuremberg in 1908 it was an entirely different time in the entire Anthroposophical movement. The main thing then was to interpret Anthroposophy by means of the Apocalypse, as it were. One can interpret a great deal through the Apocalypse, and the events in the world which it was important to mention at that time could already be seen in the Apocalypse.
326. The Origins of Natural Science: Lecture VII 02 Jan 1923, Dornach
Tr. Maria St. Goar, Norman MacBeth

Rudolf Steiner
It was because we lost the power to experience inwardly something that is spoken of in Anthroposophy today and that in former times was perceived by a sort of instinctive clairvoyance. Scientific perception has lost the ability to see into man and grasp how he is composed of different elements.
167. Things in Past and Present in the Spirit of Man: Shedding Light on the Deeper Impulses of History. Blavatsky 28 Mar 1916, Berlin
Tr. E. H. Goddard

Rudolf Steiner
On the one side you have the Berlin-Bagdad Railway and an the other side Anthroposophy. I was trying to work for the Pan-Germanic tendency, to separate India from England. In 1909 in Budapest, Mrs.

Results 1251 through 1260 of 1667

˂ 1 ... 124 125 126 127 128 ... 167 ˃