Donate books to help fund our work. Learn more→

The Rudolf Steiner Archive

a project of Steiner Online Library, a public charity

Search results 1121 through 1130 of 1683

˂ 1 ... 111 112 113 114 115 ... 169 ˃
122. Preliminary Lecture Before the Genesis Lecture Cycle 16 Aug 1910, Munich

Rudolf Steiner
And let me remind you once more that the presentation of 'The Children of Lucifer', which we were able to stage last year and which we were so happy to repeat these days, had to be awaited patiently by us for seven years. The work of seven years in the field of anthroposophy had to precede this presentation. Last year I recalled how I had given a lecture at the founding of our German Section in Berlin that was linked to the drama 'The Children of Lucifer', and how at that time it was an ideal floating before my soul, to be allowed to present this drama on the stage.
Above all, let us remember the man who, when it comes to doing something in the spirit of anthroposophy in our ranks, is always there with all his heart and all his skills, let us remember our dear friend Arenson, who supported us both last year and this year with his beautiful musical skills and who made it possible for us to transition from “The Children of Lucifer” as well as from what we tried yesterday, in the appropriate places, in a dignified manner into something that can only be felt from the world of sound.
213. Human Questions and World Answers: Thirteenth Lecture 22 Jul 1922, Dornach

Rudolf Steiner
Even if this ancient knowledge was not the fully conscious knowledge that we are striving for today through anthroposophy, for example, there was still a kind of dream-like but clairvoyant knowledge in those ancient times, at least up to the Mystery of Golgotha.
We have about as much of the greatest portrayals of the mystery of Golgotha as posterity would have of anthroposophy if it only read the writings of Kal/ly. I think one would not get a very adequate picture. You always have to bear in mind how these first four centuries worked to eradicate precisely the most intense insights that were still available when one looked out into the cosmos and knew that the Christ came to earth from a spiritual cosmos.
338. How Can We Work for the Impulse of the Threefold Social Order?: First Lecture 12 Feb 1921, Stuttgart

Rudolf Steiner
You see, it is of course right to defend oneself against the attacks that are now coming from all sides against anthroposophy and also against the threefold social order. But defense alone is not enough. We must be fully aware of that.
You will never be able to deal with him. Because what emanates from anthroposophy, what emanates from the threefold social order, he does not understand even in a subordinate clause.
338. The Social Future: Appendices
Tr. Harry Collison

Bernhard Behrens
This most important statement shows how Anthroposophy solves the crucial problem of modern physiology and psychology, that is to say, it explains the relation between body and soul.
338. Earthly and Cosmic Man: Foreword
Tr. Dorothy S. Osmond

Marie Steiner
Thirty years ago, on the 20th October, 1902, in Berlin, Rudolf Steiner gave his first lecture on Anthroposophy, and on the 21st translated into German the theosophical lecture delivered by Annie Besant who at that time had not come under the sway of the unhealthy influences to which she afterwards fell victim.
338. The Riddles of the Soul: Appendix. Dessoir's Response to Steiner's Essay on Him

Max Dessoir
It is his response to Rudolf Steiner's essay and provides a classic study of the tactics necessary to someone who is careless about the truth: ...In the chapter on anthroposophy, to be sure, I have made no changes, because Herr Dr. Steiner, in his recently published book Riddles of the Soul, zeros in on my word choice; so everything better remain as it was.
25. Cosmology, Religion and Philosophy: On Experiencing the Will-part of the Soul 15 Sep 1922, Dornach
Tr. Unknown

Rudolf Steiner
From this point of view this is quite intelligible, because according to it one has not the least idea how much more is a complete knowledge of the human being than mere knowledge of the human body. We can genuinely say that Anthroposophy is aware of the objections of its opponents and knows how to appreciate them. But just for this reason we also know how difficult it is to convince these opponents.
123. The Gospel of St. Matthew (1946): The upward development of man 12 Sep 1910, Bern
Tr. Unknown

Rudolf Steiner
To people who think in accordance with Anthroposophy it should be clear from the beginning that there are two possibilities; the upward evolution of men to spiritual heights, and the descent from above of divine, spiritual beings into human bodies or human souls.
We must realize also that it is exactly here that Anthroposophy ma so easily go wrong. For even our movement is by no means free from playing with all kinds of Symbolism drawn from the world of the stars.
It is not a matter of preaching the tenets of Anthroposophy, but that we place them in a setting of living feeling—that we do not merely talk of tolerance and remain intolerant because we have a prejudice in favour of one religious system or another.
123. The Festivals and Their Meaning I: Christmas: Christmas at a Time of Grievous Destiny 21 Dec 1916, Basel
Tr. Dorothy S. Osmond

Rudolf Steiner
The accusation is, of course, made by people whose ignorance of the Gnosis is on a par with their ignorance of Anthroposophy. There is no question of reviving the Gnosis, but of recognising it as something great and mighty, something that endeavoured, in the time now lying nineteen hundred years behind us, to give an answer to the question: Who is the Christ?
The Mystery-truths are not the childish trifles presented by certain mystic sects to-day; the Mystery-truths are great and potent impulses in the evolution of mankind. Present-day Anthroposophy can no more revert to the Gnosis than mankind can revert to what the ancient Mysteries of the North, for example, signified for human evolution.
69c. Christ in the 20th Century 06 May 1912, Cologne
Tr. Unknown

Rudolf Steiner
In Gnosticism, a form of thought to which anthroposophy by no means advises returning but simply studies as a phenomenon of past history, we find many different shadings of certain lofty concepts, all centering in an attempt to grasp the Christ idea.
But let me say at once that it was not possible for Aristotle as a man of his time to do other than picture the soul as an unchanging entity doomed to gaze forever at its earthly deeds. Modern spiritual science, anthroposophy, recognizes, of course, that the soul can do more after death than just look back as though in memory-pictures on its previous earth-life.

Results 1121 through 1130 of 1683

˂ 1 ... 111 112 113 114 115 ... 169 ˃